The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry © 2013 BY QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO, INC. PRINTING OF THIS DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO PERSONAL USE ONLY. NO PART MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE PUBLISHER. 217 Open Flap Debridement in Combination with Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft for the Prevention of Postsurgical Gingival Recession: A Case Series Ramesh Sundersing Chavan, BDS, MDS1 The therapeutic objective of peri- Manohar Laxman Bhongade, MSc, BDS, MDS2 odontal flap surgery is to provide Ishan Ramakant Tiwari, BDS, MDS1 accessibility to the underlying Priyanka Jaiswal, BDS, MDS1 root surface to reduce the pocket depth,1 arrest further breakdown, and prevent additional attach- Open flap debridement with flap repositioning may result in significant gingival ment loss. Open flap debridement recession. Patients with chronic periodontitis were treated with open flap 2 debridement followed by placement of an acellular dermal matrix allograft (OFD) is a common procedure for (ADMA) underneath the flap to minimize the occurrence of postsurgical gingival the treatment of deep periodontal recession. Ten patients (total, 60 teeth) with periodontal pockets in the anterior pockets associated with horizontal dentition underwent open flap debridement combined with ADMA. Probing bone loss. This procedure is indi- pocket depth, relative attachment level, and relative gingival margin level were cated when pocket elimination is recorded at baseline and 6 months postsurgery. The mean probing pocket undesirable because of esthetic depth at baseline and 6 months was 4.4 and 1.7 mm, respectively (P < .05); the mean relative attachment level at baseline and 6 months was 12.9 and 10.7 mm, considerations, particularly in the respectively (P < .05); and the mean relative gingival margin level at baseline and anterior dentition. However, sur- 6 months was 8.4 and 9.0 mm, respectively. ADMA underneath the flap when gical debridement with flap repo- combined with open flap debridement effectively minimizes postsurgical sitioning may result in significant gingival recession. (Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33:217–221. gingival recession.2–4 Becker et al1 doi: 10.11607/prd.0416) reported greater gingival recession in sites with deeper periodontal pockets, and prevention of gingi- val recession should be considered one of the goals of flap debride- ment surgery. In a case series study, Hirsch et 1 Senior Lecturer, Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Sharad Pawar Dental al5 reported that OFD combined College and Hospital, Deemed University, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. with a subepithelial connective tis- 2Professor and Head, Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Deemed University, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. sue graft (SCTG) for the treatment of suprabony pockets was found to Correspondence to: Dr Ramesh S. Chavan, Department of Periodontics and Implantology, be an effective procedure to pre- Sharad Pawar Dental College, Deemed University, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, 442001, vent postsurgical gingival reces- Maharashtra, India; fax: 00 91 7152 287701; email: [email protected] sion. The SCTG offers a dual blood ©2013 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.. supply, improved esthetics, and Volume 33, Number 2, 2013 © 2013 BY QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO, INC. PRINTING OF THIS DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO PERSONAL USE ONLY. NO PART MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE PUBLISHER. 218 Fig 1 Preoperative clinical view. Fig 2 Preoperative measurement using the Florida Disk Probe. excellent predictability, but this for the treatment of multiple gin- keratinized gingiva (Fig 1). Exclu- procedure utilizes a second surgi- gival recessions has been docu- sion criteria consisted of patients cal site with associated morbid- mented and provides comparable who would not comply with peri- ity.6 Therefore, multiple sites may results between ADMA and SCTG. odontal maintenance, smoking, be required, and the patient may To the best of the authors’ knowl- grade II tooth mobility, malocclu- have to undergo multiple surger- edge, no study has reported the sion in the anterior quadrant, histo- ies in the area to acquire sufficient ability of ADMA implanted be- ry of periodontal surgical treatment, graft tissue.7 In an effort to avoid neath the flap during OFD for the and pregnant or lactating women. the multiple surgical sites required treatment of a suprabony pocket for harvesting a connective tis- to minimize postsurgical gingival sue graft from the palate, acellular recession. This study aimed to do so. Clinical measurements dermal matrix allograft (ADMA) has become increasingly popular The full-mouth plaque score was as- as a substitute for connective tis- Method and materials sessed using the Turesky-Gilmore- sue grafts.8 In a controlled clinical Glickman modification of the study, Harris9 compared the use Ten patients (5 men, 5 women) be- Plaque Index,11 and gingival in- of ADMA and SCTG underneath tween the ages of 31 and 42 years flammation was assessed using the a coronally positioned flap and (mean age, 33.90 ± 3.44 years) with Papillary Bleeding Index12 on the reported equal predictability with chronic periodontitis were select- day of surgery and 6 months post- comparable root coverage in the ed. All patients were systemically operatively. The probing pocket treatment of gingival recession. healthy but possessed the follow- depth (PPD), relative attachment Multiple clinical studies have also ing: presence of a residual probing level (RAL), and relative gingival documented predictable and es- pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 5 mm and at- margin level (RGML) were record- thetic outcomes with ADMA in the tachment loss ≥ 5 mm around more ed for assessment of results. These treatment of multiple gingival re- than one surface of each tooth in measurements were recorded us- cession defects. Recent histologic the anterior dentition, radiographic ing a Florida Disk Probe (Florida evidence of new attachment10 fol- evidence of horizontal bone loss, Probe Corp) (Fig 2). The tip of the lowing root coverage procedures and presence of at least 2 mm of Florida Disk Probe was placed at The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry © 2013 BY QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO, INC. PRINTING OF THIS DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO PERSONAL USE ONLY. NO PART MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE PUBLISHER. 219 Fig 3 Flap reflection and debridement after crevicular incisions Fig 4 Placement of ADMA underneath the flap. were performed. the base of the pocket with the esthesia, a conventional approach in the treated area. All patients base of the disk resting at the oc- with a periodontal access flap was were placed on 0.2% chlorhexidine clusal level; the foot pedal was initiated using intrasulcular inci- gluconate mouthrinse (10 mL twice pressed, and the measurement sions on the buccal and lingual as- daily for 1 minute) for 6 weeks. The was recorded as the RAL consider- pects. One tooth mesial and distal periodontal pack and sutures were ing the occlusal level as a fixed ref- to the experimental site were in- removed 8 to 10 days after surgery. erence point. Again, the probe was cluded in the flap. A full-thickness Patients were instructed to clean placed at the gingival margin and flap was reflected, granulation tis- the treated site with a cotton pellet the foot pedal was pressed, and sue was removed, and the roots saturated with 0.2% chlorhexidine the distance from the occlusal level were planed using curettes (Fig 3). gluconate for an additional 3 to to the gingival margin was consid- ADMA was hydrated in ster- 5 weeks in the apicocoronal direc- ered the RGML. PPD was calculat- ile saline for 15 minutes. After flap tion and later using a soft tooth- ed by subtracting the RGML from reflection, debridement, and root brush and the Charter method of the RAL. All measurements were surface management, the graft was brushing. The postoperative clini- recorded at four sites per tooth: trimmed to the shape and size de- cal view can be seen in Fig 6. mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual. signed to cover the exposed root For later calculations, the mean of surface and extended 2 to 3 mm on the four sites was taken into con- the bone surface (Fig 4). The flap Statistical analysis sideration. All probing measure- was then positioned coronally to ments were recorded at baseline completely cover the ADMA. The Statistical analysis was performed and 6 months postoperatively. flap was stabilized with simple inter- using the Student paired t test with rupted 4-0 Vicryl sutures (4-0 non- the help of Statistical Package for absorbable surgical suture; Mersilk, Social Sciences software (SPSS ver- Surgical procedure Johnson & Johnson) (Fig 5), and sion 14.0, IBM). a periodontal pack was placed. The surgical protocol emphasized Amoxicillin (500 mg tds) was pre- complete asepsis and infection scribed for 5 days. Patients were control. After induction of local an- instructed not to brush the teeth Volume 33, Number 2, 2013 © 2013 BY QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO, INC. PRINTING OF THIS DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO PERSONAL USE ONLY. NO PART MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE PUBLISHER. 220 Fig 5 Coronally advanced flap sutured into place. Fig 6 Postoperative clinical view. 14 12.9 Baseline 12 6 mo 10.7 10 9.0 8.4 8 6 Mean (mm) 4.4 4 2 1.7 0 PPD RAL RGML Fig 7 Postoperative measurement using the Florida Disk Probe. Fig 8 Comparison of clinical parameters at baseline and 6 months. Results At 6 months, the mean RGML Although no reports are available increased from 8.4 ± 1.21 mm at with use of ADMA underneath the At 6 months, the mean PPD de- baseline to 9.0 ± 1.03 mm, with flap during OFD for elimination creased from 4.4 ± 0.59 mm at base- a mean change of 0.6 ± 0.67 mm of suprabony pockets to prevent line to 1.7 ± 0.37 mm (Fig 7).
Recommended publications
  • A Mini Review on Non-Augmentative Surgical Therapy of Peri-Implantitis—What Is Known and What Are the Future Challenges?
    MINI REVIEW published: 20 April 2021 doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2021.659361 A Mini Review on Non-augmentative Surgical Therapy of Peri-Implantitis—What Is Known and What Are the Future Challenges? Kristina Bertl 1,2* and Andreas Stavropoulos 1,3,4 1 Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden, 2 Division of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 3 Division of Regenerative Dental Medicine and Periodontology, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, 4 Division of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Non-augmentative surgical therapy of peri-implantitis is indicated for cases with primarily horizontal bone loss or wide defects with limited potential for bone regeneration and/or re-osseointegration. This treatment approach includes a variety of different techniques (e.g., open flap debridement, resection of peri-implant mucosa, apically positioned flaps, bone re-contouring, implantoplasty, etc.) and various relevant aspects should be considered during treatment planning. The present mini review provides an overview on what is known for the following components of non-augmentative surgical treatment of Edited by: Priscila Casado, peri-implantitis and on potential future research challenges: (1) decontamination of the Fluminense Federal University, Brazil implant surface, (2) need of implantoplasty, (3) prescription of antibiotics,
    [Show full text]
  • Periodontal Surgery in Furcation-Involved Maxillary Molars Revisited—An Introduction of Guidelines for Comprehensive Treatment
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RERO DOC Digital Library Clin Oral Invest (2011) 15:9–20 DOI 10.1007/s00784-010-0431-9 REVIEW Periodontal surgery in furcation-involved maxillary molars revisited—an introduction of guidelines for comprehensive treatment Clemens Walter & Roland Weiger & Nicola Ursula Zitzmann Received: 1 November 2009 /Accepted: 1 June 2010 /Published online: 23 June 2010 # Springer-Verlag 2010 Abstract Maxillary molars with interradicular loss of overview, including what constitutes accurate diagnosis and periodontal tissue have an increased risk of additional what indications there are for the different surgical attachment loss with an impaired long-term prognosis. periodontal treatment options. Since accurate clinical analysis of furcation involvement is not feasible due to limited access, morphological variations Keywords Furcation involvement . Furcation surgery. and measurement errors, additional diagnostics, e.g., with Diagnosis . Decision making . 3D imaging cone-beam computed tomography, may be required. Surgi- cal treatment options have graduated from a less invasive Abbreviations and acronyms approach, i.e., keeping as much periodontal attachment as FI Furcation involvement possible, to a more invasive approach: (1) open flap PPD Probing pocket depth debridement with/without gingivectomy or apically reposi- PAL Probing attachment level tioned flap and/or tunnelling; (2) root separation; (3) Sc&Rp Scaling and root planning amputation/trisection of a root (with/without root separation RCT Root canal treatment or tunnel preparation); (4) amputation/trisection of two SPT Supportive periodontal treatment roots; and (5) extraction of the entire tooth. Tunnelling is FDP Fixed dental prosthesis indicated when the degree of root separation allows for RDP Removable dental prosthesis opening of the interradicular region.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Download
    wjpls, 2018, Vol. 4, Issue 8, 182-184 Case Report ISSN 2454-2229 Gavali et al. World Journal of Pharmaceutical World Journaland Life of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Life Sciences WJPLS www.wjpls.org SJIF Impact Factor: 5.088 THE MODIFIED WIDMAN FLAP TECHNIQUE: A CASE REPORT Dr. Neelam Gavali*1, Dr. Pramod Waghmare2, Dr. Vishakha Patil3, Dr. Nilima Landge4 1Post Graduate Student, Department of Periodontology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital- Pune. 2Professor, Department of Periodontology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital- Pune. 3Professor, Department of Periodontology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital- Pune. 4Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital- Pune. *Corresponding Author: Dr. Neelam Gavali Post Graduate Student, Department of Periodontology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital- Pune. Article Received on 24/05/2018 Article Revised on 14/06/2018 Article Accepted on 05/07/2018 ABSTRACT The Modified Widman flap (MWF), one of the most common and conservative surgical approaches that aims to eliminate the inflamed gingival tissue and also provide access for root debridement. It is classified with the “access flap operations” because the goal of the flap reflection is primarily to provide improved visual access to the periodontally involved tissues. The modified widman flap surgery is not aimed at surgical eradication of pocket walls, including bony walls. It is aimed at maximum healing in areas of previous periodontal pockets with minimum loss of periodontal tissues during and after the surgery.[6] KEYWORDS: Modified widman flap, Gingival enlargement.
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Management of Peri-Implantitis
    Current Oral Health Reports (2020) 7:283–303 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-020-00278-y PERI-IMPLANTITIS (I DARBY, SECTION EDITOR) Surgical Management of Peri-implantitis Ausra Ramanauskaite1 & Karina Obreja1 & Frank Schwarz1 Published online: 1 August 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Purpose of Review To provide an overview of current surgical peri-implantitis treatment options. Recent Findings Surgical procedures for peri-implantitis treatment include two main approaches: non-augmentative and aug- mentative therapy. Open flap debridement (OFD) and resective treatment are non-augmentative techniques that are indicated in the presence of horizontal bone loss in aesthetically nondemanding areas. Implantoplasty performed adjunctively at supracrestally and buccally exposed rough implant surfaces has been shown to efficiently attenuate soft tissue inflammation compared to control sites. However, this was followed by more pronounced soft tissue recession. Adjunctive augmentative measures are recommended at peri-implantitis sites exhibiting intrabony defects with a minimum depth of 3 mm and in the presence of keratinized mucosa. In more advanced cases with combined defect configurations, a combination of augmentative therapy and implantoplasty at exposed rough implant surfaces beyond the bony envelope is feasible. Summary For the time being, no particular surgical protocol or material can be considered as superior in terms of long-term peri- implant tissue stability. Keywords Peri-implantitis . Treatment . Surgical therapy Introduction of further bone loss [5]. To achieve these treatment endpoints, it is currently accepted that surgical approaches that allow ade- Peri-implantitis is a plaque-associated pathological condition quate access to the contaminated implant surface are required occurring around dental implants that results in a breakdown [6–8].
    [Show full text]
  • The Treatment of Peri-Implant Diseases: a New Approach Using HYBENX® As a Decontaminant for Implant Surface and Oral Tissues
    antibiotics Article The Treatment of Peri-Implant Diseases: A New Approach Using HYBENX® as a Decontaminant for Implant Surface and Oral Tissues Michele Antonio Lopez 1,†, Pier Carmine Passarelli 2,†, Emmanuele Godino 2, Nicolò Lombardo 2 , Francesca Romana Altamura 3, Alessandro Speranza 2 , Andrea Lopez 4, Piero Papi 3,* , Giorgio Pompa 3 and Antonio D’Addona 2 1 Unit of Otolaryngology, University Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy; [email protected] 2 Division of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Department of Head and Neck, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, 00168 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (P.C.P.); [email protected] (E.G.); [email protected] (N.L.); [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (A.D.) 3 Department of Oral and Maxillo Facial Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (F.R.A.); [email protected] (G.P.) 4 Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Background: Peri-implantitis is a pathological condition characterized by an inflammatory Citation: Lopez, M.A.; Passarelli, process involving soft and hard tissues surrounding dental implants. The management of peri- P.C.; Godino, E.; Lombardo, N.; implant disease has several protocols, among which is the chemical method HYBENX®. The aim Altamura, F.R.; Speranza, A.; Lopez, of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of HYBENX® in the treatment of peri-implantitis and to A.; Papi, P.; Pompa, G.; D’Addona, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbiological Outcomes from Different Periodontal Maintenance Interventions: a Systematic Review
    SYSTEMAIC REVIEW Periodontics Microbiological outcomes from different periodontal maintenance interventions: a systematic review Patricia Daniela Melchiors ANGST(a) Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the differences in the Amanda Finger STADLER(b) subgingival microbiological outcomes between periodontal patients Rui Vicente OPPERMANN(c) Sabrina Carvalho GOMES(c) submitted to a supragingival control (SPG) regimen as compared to subgingival scaling and root planing performed combined with supragingival debridement (SPG + SBG) intervention during the (a) Universidade Federal de Pelotas – UFPEL, periodontal maintenance period (PMP). A systematic literature search Dental School, Department of Semiology using electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) was conducted and Clinic, Pelotas, RS, Brazil. looking for articles published up to August 2016 and independent of (b) Augusta University, The Dental College language. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, of Georgia, Department of Periodontics, quality assessment and data collection. Only human randomized or Augusta, GA, United States of America. non-randomized clinical trials with at least 6-months-follow-up after (c) Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do periodontal treatment and presenting subgingival microbiological Sul – UFRGS, Dental School, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. outcomes related to SPG and/or SPG+SBG therapies were included. Search strategy found 2,250 titles. Among these, 148 (after title analysis) and 39 (after abstract analysis) papers were considered to be relevant. Finally, 19 studies were selected after full-text analysis. No article had a direct comparison between the therapies. Five SPG and 14 SPG+SBG studies presented experimental groups with these respective regimens and were descriptively analyzed while most of the results were only presented graphically.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Flap Debridement Using 810Nm Diode Laser and Conventional Surgery in Patients on Low Dose Aspirin– a Comparative Study”
    IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 18, Issue 12 Ser.11 (December. 2019), PP 69-83 www.iosrjournals.org “Open Flap Debridement Using 810nm Diode Laser and Conventional Surgery in Patients on Low Dose Aspirin– A Comparative Study” Dr Nada Musharraf Ali1, Dr Sheela Kumar Gujjari2, Dr Archana R Sankar3 1(Periodontist registrar / Dr Abdul Rahman AL Mishari Hospital , Saudi Arabia) 2( Professor and HOD,Department of Periodontology,JSS Dental College and Hospital/JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, India) 3(Postgraduate student, Department of Periodontology,JSS Dental College and Hospital/JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, India) Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the adjunctive effects of the diode laser in open flap debridement as compared with the conventional surgical techniques. Chronic periodontitis patients on low dose aspirin were randomized into test (diode laser application after flap surgery) and control( flap surgery without laser ). The results showed less blood volume lost and better clinical improvements in the test sites. Henceforth the study has proved that lasers can form an integral part of periodontal therapy in patients on low dose aspirin(<150mg) without altering their drug regime. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of Submission: 17-12-2019 Date of Acceptance: 31-12-2019 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Introduction NSAIDs, especially low dose aspirin are one of the frequently prescribed drugs particularly in patients prone to cardio-vascular disorders and arthritis. About 10% of rural and 25% of urban population in India suffer from hypertension1. Anti-platelet therapy especially low dose aspirin is routinely given in the management of patients suffering from these arterio-vascular diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Modified Widman Flap (MWF)
    295_322_neu.qxd 24.03.2005 13:55 Uhr Seite 309 309 “Access Flap” Surgery, Open Flap Debridement (OFD)— Modified Widman Flap (MWF) Of the numerous periodontal surgical techniques, the oft-modified Widman flap (“Modified Wid- man Flap,” MWF) remains the standard procedure for open periodontitis therapy (Widman 1918, Ramfjord & Nissle 1974, Ramfjord 1977). It is classified with the “access flap operations” because the goal of the flap reflection is primarily to provide improved visual access to the periodontally involved tissues. The method is characterized by precise incisions, partial flap reflection and an atraumatic proce- dure, whose goal is not necessarily pocket elimination but “healing” (regeneration or a long junc- tional epithelium) of the periodontal pocket with minimum tissue loss. Because the alveolar process is only partially exposed, post-operative pain and swelling are rare. The main goals of the procedure include optimum mechanical subgingival root planing and “de- contamination” with direct vision, as well as healing by primary intention following close inter- dental flap adaptation. No ostectomy is performed. However, minor contouring osteoplasty can be performed to improve the facial or oral osseous morphology, primarily to achieve the desired in- terdental defect closure. Indications Contraindications • The MWF is indicated for the treatment of all types of per- There are but few contraindications for the MWF: iodontitis, but is especially effective with pocket depths of 5–7 mm. • Lack of or very thin and narrow attached gingiva can • Dependent upon the pathomorphologic situation on the render the technique difficult, because a narrow band of individual teeth, the MWF may be combined with larger attached gingiva does not permit the initial scalloped in- and fully reflected flaps (resective methods) and special cision (internal gingivectomy).
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Periodontics: Regenerative Procedures – Dental Clinical Policy
    UnitedHealthcare® Dental Clinical Policy Surgical Periodontics: Regenerative Procedures Policy Number: DCP014.08 Effective Date: April 1, 2021 Instructions for Use Table of Contents Page Related Dental Policies Coverage Rationale ....................................................................... 1 • Dental Barrier Membrane Guided Tissue Definitions ...................................................................................... 2 Regeneration Applicable Codes .......................................................................... 3 • Full Mouth Debridement Description of Services ................................................................. 3 • Implants Clinical Evidence ........................................................................... 4 • Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy U.S. Food and Drug Administration ............................................. 9 References ..................................................................................... 9 • Provisional Splinting Policy History/Revision Information ........................................... 11 • Surgical Endodontics Instructions for Use ..................................................................... 11 • Surgical Periodontics: Mucogingival Procedures • Surgical Periodontics: Resective Procedures Coverage Rationale Bone Replacement Grafts for Retained Natural Teeth Bone Replacement Grafts for retained natural teeth are indicated for the following: Infrabony/Intrabony vertical defects Class II Furcation involvements Bone Replacement Grafts for
    [Show full text]
  • 유치열기에서 나타난 치은섬유종증 환자의 장기간 관리 Long-Term Management of a Gingival Fibromatosis Patient with the Primary Dentition
    유치열기에서 나타난 치은섬유종증 환자의 장기간 관리 Long-term Management of a Gingival Fibromatosis Patient with the Primary Dentition 저자 강정민 ; 이제호 ; 최형준 ; 송제선 ; 김성오 저널명 大韓小兒齒科學會誌 = Journal of the Korean academy of pediatric dentistry 발행기관 대한소아치과학회 NDSL URL http://www.ndsl.kr/ndsl/search/detail/article/articleSearchResultDetail.do?cn=JAKO201436351075397 IP/ID 128.134.207.84 이용시간 2018/01/11 14:43:05 저작권 안내 ① NDSL에서 제공하는 모든 저작물의 저작권은 원저작자에게 있으며, KISTI는 복제/배포/전송권을 확보하고 있습니다. ② NDSL에서 제공하는 콘텐츠를 상업적 및 기타 영리목적으로 복제/배포/전송할 경우 사전에 KISTI의 허락을 받아야 합니다. ③ NDSL에서 제공하는 콘텐츠를 보도, 비평, 교육, 연구 등을 위하여 정당한 범위 안에서 공정한 관행에 합치되게 인용할 수 있습니다. ④ NDSL에서 제공하는 콘텐츠를 무단 복제, 전송, 배포 기타 저작권법에 위반되는 방법으로 이용할 경우 저작권법 제136조에 따라 5년 이하의 징역 또는 5천만 원 이하의 벌금에 처해질 수 있습니다. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 41(4) 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2014.41.4.328 ISSN (print) 1226-8496 ISSN (online) 2288-3819 Long-term Management of a Gingival Fibromatosis Patient with the Primary Dentition Chungmin Kang, Jaeho Lee, Hyungjun Choi, Jeseon Song, Seongoh Kim Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University Abstract Gingival fibromatosis is a rare oral condition that is characterized by proliferative fibrous overgrowth of the attached gingiva, the marginal gingiva, and the interdental papilla, typically presenting in the growth period. A case of a 27-month-old girl with a generalized severe gingival overgrowth is described herein. The patient had no known systemic disease, but enlarged gingival tissue had gradually covered her teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Aggressive Periodontitis with Idiopathic Gingival Enlargement: an Unusual Case Report
    I J Pre Clin Dent Res 2014;1(2):68-70 International Journal of Preventive & April-June Clinical Dental Research All rights reserved Aggressive Periodontitis with Idiopathic Gingival Enlargement: An Unusual Case Report Abstract Dr Chitra Agarwal1, Dr Ashish Gingival overgrowth occurs due to many reasons but sometimes its Sharma2, Dr Pragya Harsh3 etiology can not be ruled out and hence the diagnosis of idiopathic gingival overgrowth is made. It is a rare condition characterized by the 1Senior Lecturer, Department of Periodontics, proliferative fibrous overgrowth of the gingival tissue. It does not Jodhpur Dental College General Hospital, causes bone loss, however, impedes proper plaque control. Rarely, it is Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India 2 associated with aggressive periodontitis. In this case report, a case of Senior Lecturer, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Jodhpur Dental College and General aggressive periodontitis with idiopathic gingival enlargement is Hospital, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India discussed and followed for 1 year to evaluate the recurrence of the 3Senior Resident, Department of Oral and lesion. Flap surgery with internal bevel gingivectomy was done for the Maxillofacial Surgery, S.N. Medical College correction of the lesion. No recurrence was seen 1 year post operative. and Mathura Das Mathur Hospital, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India Key Words Idiopathic gingival enlargement, aggressive periodontitis, gingival overgrowth INTRODUCTION diastemas, and prolonged retention of primary An esthetic and functional problem in patients with teeth.[5] In some conditions, gingival enlargement gingival enlargement forces them to seek can progress rapidly into destructive periodontal periodontal treatment. Besides various reasons for diseases, as a result of the altered immune response the enlargement, sometimes it is idiopathic in of the gingiva to the bacterial plaque and leading to nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Supportive Periodontal Therapy a Comprehensive Review
    For Post-Graduate Examinations Supportive Periodontal Therapy A Comprehensive Review Dr. Suchetha Aghanashini Dr. Surya Suprabhan Dr. Darshan B.M. Dr. Sapna N. Supportive Periodontal Therapy : A Comprehensive Review IP Innovative Publication Pvt. Ltd. Supportive Periodontal Therapy : A Comprehensive Review Dr. Suchetha Aghanashini Dr. Surya Suprabhan Dr. Darshan B.M. Dr. Sapna N. IP Innovative Publication Pvt. Ltd. IP Innovative Publication Pvt. Ltd. A-2, Gulab Bagh, Nawada, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059, India.Ph: +91-11-61364114, 61364115. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Web: www.innovativepublication.com Supportive Periodontal Therapy : A Comprehensive Review ISBN : 978-93-88022-29-3 Edition : First, 2019 Open Access Book Dedicated To All the post graduate dental students! About The Authors Dr. Suchetha Aghanashini Professor and HOD Department of Periodontology DAPMRV Dental College, Bangalore Dr. Surya Suprabhan Post Graduate Student Department of Periodontology DAPMRV Dental College, Bangalore Dr. Darshan B. M. Reader, Department of Periodontology DAPMRV Dental College, Bangalore Dr. Sapna N. Reader, Department of Periodontology DAPMRV Dental College, Bangalore Preface Supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) is the term given to care and proper maintenance of the patient after completion of periodontal therapy. One of the causes of failure of periodontal therapy is the inadequate follow-up. Hence, patients as well as specialists should be made to understand the significance of supportive periodontal therapy. The purpose of this book is to make the dental professionals/post-graduate students aware of the facts regarding the importance and the protocols of SPT. It is my great privilege to introduce my new textbook “Supportive Periodontal Therapy : A Comprehensive Review”, and I hope that it will be useful to the post- graduate students as well as dental professionals.
    [Show full text]