DOCSLIB.ORG

Southern Staffordshire Outline Water Cycle Study Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southern Staffordshire Outline Water Cycle Study Final Report INSERT YOUR PICTURE(S) IN THIS CELL Southern Staffordshire Outline Water Cycle Study Final Report Stafford Borough, Lichfield District, Tamworth Borough, South Staffordshire District and Cannock Chase District Councils July 2010 Final Report 9V5955 CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 General Overview 1 1.2 Scope 1 1.3 Objectives of the Water Cycle Study 2 2 DATA COLLECTION AND METHODOLOGY 3 2.1 Overview 3 2.2 Data Collection and Guidance on the use of this Study 3 2.3 Housing Growth and Employment Trajectories 4 2.4 Flood Risk 5 2.5 Water Resources and Supply 6 2.6 Wastewater Collection and Treatment 7 2.7 Water Quality and Environmental Issues 7 2.8 Development Area Actions 8 2.9 Data Limitations 8 3 STRATEGIC ASSESSMENTS 9 3.1 Water Supply and Resources 9 3.1.1 Water Resources 9 3.1.2 Severn Trent Water Limited 12 3.1.3 South Staffordshire Water 20 3.1.4 Environment Agency 24 3.1.5 Non Residential Water Use 32 3.1.6 Canal Network 32 3.1.7 Conclusions 33 3.2 Wastewater Collection and Treatment 34 3.2.1 Introduction 34 3.2.2 Wastewater Infrastructure 35 3.2.3 STWL Generic WCS Response 36 3.2.4 Wastewater Treatment 38 3.3 Water Quality and Environmental Issues 44 3.3.1 Introduction 44 3.3.2 Directives 44 3.3.3 River Quality 45 3.3.4 Effect of Development upon Water Quality 46 3.3.5 Designated Sites 47 3.3.6 Effect of WwTWs on Water Quality 47 3.3.7 Effect of Agricultural Practices on Water Quality 47 3.4 Flood Risk 50 3.4.1 Introduction 50 3.4.2 Environment Agency Flood Maps 51 3.4.3 SFRAs 52 3.4.4 Regional Flood Risk Appraisal (RFRA) 53 3.4.5 SWMP 53 Southern Staffordshire WCS 9V5955/R00004/303671/Soli Final Report -i- July 2010 4 DEMAND MANAGEMENT 55 4.1 General 55 4.2 Water Usage 55 4.2.1 Metering 55 4.2.2 Leakage Control 56 4.2.3 Sustainable Housing 58 4.3 Sustainable Drainage Systems 61 4.3.1 SUDS Selection 63 4.4 Developer Contributions 71 4.4.1 Introduction 71 4.4.2 National Policy Framework 71 4.4.3 Planning Obligations and Circular 5/05 72 4.4.4 Community Infrastructure Levy 73 4.4.5 The relationship between the CIL and Planning Obligations 75 4.4.6 The Local Planning Authority 76 5 STAFFORD BOROUGH DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC RESULTS 77 5.1 Introduction 77 5.2 Growth and Development 77 5.2.1 Scenarios for Growth 77 5.2.2 Potential Development Sites 78 5.3 Water Resources and Water Supply 79 5.3.1 Water Resources 79 5.3.2 Water Supply 83 5.3.3 Summary 83 5.4 Wastewater Treatment and Collection 85 5.4.1 Wastewater Treatment 85 5.4.2 Wastewater Collection 90 5.4.3 Summary 90 5.5 Water Quality and Environmental Issues 92 5.5.1 Water Quality 93 5.5.2 Environmental Issues 97 5.5.3 Summary 103 5.6 Flood Risk 105 5.6.1 Fluvial Flood Risk 105 5.6.2 Surface Water Flooding 105 5.6.3 Groundwater 106 5.6.4 Canals 106 5.6.5 Reservoirs 106 5.6.6 Summary 107 5.7 Demand Management 111 5.7.1 Summary 115 5.8 Constraints Matrix 116 5.9 Recommendations 117 5.9.1 LDF Policies and Development Control Policies 117 6 LICHFIELD DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC RESULTS 119 6.1 Introduction 119 6.2 Growth and Development 119 9V5955/R00004/303671/Soli Southern Staffordshire WCS July 2010 -ii- Final Report 6.2.1 Scenarios for Growth 119 6.2.2 Potential Development Sites 119 6.3 Water Resources and Water Supply 121 6.3.1 Water Resources 121 6.3.2 Water Supply 124 6.3.3 Summary 125 6.4 Wastewater Treatment and Collection 127 6.4.1 Wastewater Treatment 127 6.4.2 Wastewater Collection 131 6.4.3 Summary 131 6.5 Water Quality and Environmental Issues 133 6.5.1 Water Quality 134 6.5.2 Environmental Issues 138 6.5.3 Summary 139 6.6 Flood Risk 142 6.6.1 Fluvial Flood Risk 142 6.6.2 Surface Water Flooding 143 6.6.3 Groundwater 143 6.6.4 Canals 143 6.6.5 Reservoirs 143 6.6.6 Summary 144 6.7 Demand Management 148 6.7.1 Summary 150 6.8 Constraints Matrix 150 6.9 Recommendations 151 6.9.1 LDF Policies and Development Control Policies 151 7 TAMWORTH BOROUGH DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC RESULTS 155 7.1 Introduction 155 7.2 Growth and Development 155 7.2.1 Scenarios for Growth 155 7.2.2 Potential Development Sites 155 7.3 Water Resources and Water Supply 157 7.3.1 Water Resources 157 7.3.2 Water Supply 159 7.3.3 Summary 161 7.4 Wastewater Treatment and Collection 163 7.4.1 Wastewater Treatment 163 7.4.2 Wastewater Collection 164 7.5 Water Quality and Environmental Issues 166 7.5.1 Water Quality 166 7.5.2 Environmental Issues 167 7.5.3 Summary 168 7.6 Flood Risk 169 7.6.1 Fluvial Flood Risk 169 7.6.2 Surface Water Flooding 170 7.6.3 Groundwater 170 7.6.4 Canals 171 7.6.5 Reservoirs 171 Southern Staffordshire WCS 9V5955/R00004/303671/Soli Final Report -iii- July 2010 7.6.6 Summary 171 7.7 Demand Management 174 7.7.1 Summary 175 7.8 Constraints Matrix 176 7.9 Recommendations 177 7.9.1 LDF Policies and Development Control Policies 177 8 SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRE DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC RESULTS 179 8.1 Introduction 179 8.2 Growth and Development 179 8.2.1 Scenarios for Growth 179 8.2.2 Potential Development Sites 179 8.3 Water Resources and Water Supply 181 8.3.1 Water Resources 181 8.3.2 Water Supply 185 8.3.3 Summary 187 8.4 Wastewater Treatment and Collection 189 8.4.1 Wastewater Treatment 189 8.4.2 Wastewater Collection 193 8.5 Water Quality and Environmental Issues 195 8.5.1 Water Quality 195 8.5.2 Environmental Issues 199 8.5.3 Summary 202 8.6 Flood Risk 204 8.6.1 Fluvial Flood Risk 204 8.6.2 Surface Water Flooding 205 8.6.3 Groundwater 205 8.6.4 Canals 205 8.6.5 Reservoirs 205 8.6.6 Summary 206 8.7 Demand Management 210 8.7.1 Summary 212 8.8 Constraints Matrix 212 8.9 Recommendations 213 8.9.1 LDF Policies and Development Control Policies 213 9 CANNOCK CHASE DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC RESULTS 215 9.1 Introduction 215 9.2 Growth and Development 215 9.2.1 Scenarios for Growth 215 9.2.2 Potential Development Sites 215 9.3 Water Resources and Water Supply 217 9.3.1 Water Supply 219 9.3.2 Summary 221 9.4 Wastewater Treatment and Collection 223 9.4.1 Wastewater Treatment 223 9.4.2 Wastewater Collection 225 9.5 Water Quality and Environmental Issues 227 9.5.1 Water Quality 227 9V5955/R00004/303671/Soli Southern Staffordshire WCS July 2010 -iv- Final Report 9.5.2 Environmental Issues 229 9.5.3 Summary 231 9.6 Flood Risk 232 9.6.1 Fluvial Flood Risk 232 9.6.2 Surface Water Flooding 233 9.6.3 Groundwater 233 9.6.4 Canals 234 9.6.5 Reservoirs 234 9.6.6 Summary 235 9.7 Demand Management 237 9.7.1 Summary 239 9.8 Constraints Matrix 240 9.9 Recommendations 240 9.9.1 LDF Policies and Development Control Policies 240 10 CONCLUSIONS 243 10.1 Recommendations 243 APPENDICES Appendix A - Figures Appendix B - Data Register Appendix C - CAMS Summary Appendix D - STWL Generic Response to WCSs Appendix E - SUDS Guidance Appendix F - STWL Site Specific Wastewater Treatment Analysis Appendix G - STWL Site Specific Wastewater Infrastructure Analysis Appendix H - Constraints Matrix Appendix I - Comments on Draft WCS Report and Responses Southern Staffordshire WCS 9V5955/R00004/303671/Soli Final Report -v- July 2010 9V5955/R00004/303671/Soli Southern Staffordshire WCS July 2010 -vi- Final Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Study Objectives This report has followed the requirements of the Environment Agency’s Water Cycle Study (WCS) guidance and the requirements of the Brief to produce an Outline WCS for the Local Authority areas of Stafford Borough, Lichfield District, Tamworth Borough, South Staffordshire District and Cannock Chase District. As such, it assesses the constraints and requirements that will arise from the scale of the proposed growth on the water infrastructure of southern Staffordshire. The Councils are in the process of preparing their Local Development Frameworks (LDFs), as required by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. To assist with the identification of the potential development sites and settlements most suitable for development, this WCS, through consultation with the Councils, the Environment Agency, Severn Trent Water Limited (STWL) and South Staffordshire Water (SSW) has identified the potential constraints to development within the region. It considers the following issues, addressing the constraints that they may pose to future development and discusses the improvements necessary to achieve the required level of development: • Water Resources; • Water Quality and Environmental Issues; • Water Supply; • Flood Risk; and • Wastewater Collection; • Demand Management • Wastewater Treatment; In addition to assisting the Councils, the WCS process also provides a benefit to the water companies by providing them with a more detailed indication of the potential development within the area.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historic Environment Character Assessment: East Staffordshire August 2013
    Historic Environment Character Assessment: East Staffordshire August 2013 Copyright © Staffordshire County Council Tel: 01785 277285 Email: [email protected] Mapping in this volume is based upon the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationary Office © Crown copyright and/or database right 2010 all rights reserved. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Staffordshire County Council Licence No. 100019422 August 2013 2 CONTROLLED DOCUMENT Staffordshire County Council EC4608/ESHEA Document No: Status: Final Rev. No: 2 Name Signature Date Prepared by: Debbie Taylor 01/07/2013 Checked by: Stephen Dean 23/08/2013 SCC Approved: Stephen Dean 23/08/2013 Revision Record Rev. Date By Summary of Changes Chkd Aprvd 1. 04/07/2013 DAT Edits and amendments from Ben SAD SAD Williscroft, East Staffordshire 2. 23/08/2013 DAT Edits and amendments from Stephen SAD SAD Dean, SCC 3 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 6 1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Background ................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Staffordshire Historic Environment Record (HER) ..................................... 9 1.3 Historic Landscape Character (HLC) ....................................................... 10 1.4 Extensive Urban Survey (EUS) ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Water Resources Management Plan
    Draft Water Resources Management Plan Statement of Response – Appendix C Prepared by the Water Resources Strategy Team 03 September 2018 Appendix C: Consultation comments and our response During the consultation stage of our draft WRMP, we received comments from a total of 22 organisations and stakeholders. We acknowledge and appreciate the time that these parties have provided to input into the development of our WRMP and we have endeavoured to respond to every observation, request and clarification that has been provided to us. In order to provide a clear line of sight between the comments made by our consultees and our response, we have prepare this Appendix to: Demonstrate the comments that our consultees raised during the consultation period. Support navigation of the Statement of Response document and associated Appendix A and Appendix B. Provide visible assurance that we have given due regard, and prepared a response, for all comments that we received during the consultation. The Table in this Appendix lists all consultation comments that we received. The list is sorted alphabetically by organisation name. In the Table we have abbreviated organisation names in accordance with the following key. We notice that some of the responding consultees also use abbreviations that may be unfamiliar to other organisations. As such, we have provided a glossary of terms to assist understanding of this document. We received consultation comments from the following organisations: Notation in Appendix C Organisation C&RT Canal & Rivers Trust
    [Show full text]
  • A Cornerstone of the Historical Landscape
    Stourbridge's Western Boundary: A cornerstone of the historical landscape by K James BSc(Hons) MSc PhD FIAP (email: [email protected]) The present-day administrative boundaries around Stourbridge are the result of a long and complex series of organizational changes, land transfers and periods of settlement, invasion and warfare dating back more than two thousand years. Perhaps the most interesting section of the boundary is that to the west of Stourbridge which currently separates Dudley Metropolitan Borough from Kinver in Staffordshire. This has been the county boundary for a millennium, and its course mirrors the outline of the medieval manors of Oldswinford and Pedmore; the Domesday hundred of Clent; Anglo-Saxon royal estates, the Norman forest of Kinver and perhaps the 7th-9th century Hwiccan kingdom as well as post-Roman tribal territories. The boundary may even have its roots in earlier (though probably more diffuse) frontiers dating back to prehistoric times. Extent and Description As shown in figure 1, the boundary begins at the southern end of County Lane near its junction with the ancient road (now just a rough public footpath) joining Iverley to Ounty John Lane. It follows County Lane north-north-west, crosses the A451 and then follows the line of Sandy Lane (now a bridleway) to the junction of Sugar Loaf Lane and The Broadway. Along with County Lane, this section of Sandy Lane lies upon a first-century Roman road that connected Droitwich (Salinae) to the Roman encampments at Greensforge near Ashwood. Past Sugar Loaf Lane, the line of the boundary diverges by a few degrees to the east of the Roman road, which continues on in a straight line under the fields of Staffordshire towards Newtown Bridge and Prestwood.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources Report for Staffordshire
    BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT WF/95/5/ Mineral Resources Series Mineral Resource Information for Development Plans Staffordshire: Resources and Constraints D E Highley and D G Cameron Contributors: D P Piper, D J Harrison and S Holloway Planning Consultant: J F Cowley Mineral & Resource Planning Associates This report accompanies the 1:100 000 scale maps: Staffordshire Mineral resources (other than sand and gravel) and Staffordshire Sand and Gravel Resources Cover Photograph Cauldon limestone quarry at Waterhouses, 1977.(Blue Circle Industries) British Geological Survey Photographs. No. L2006. This report is prepared for the Department of the Environment. (Contract PECD7/1/443) Bibliographic Reference Highley, D E, and Cameron, D G. 1995. Mineral Resource Information for Development Plans Staffordshire: Resources and Constraints. British Geological Survey Technical Report WF/95/5/ © Crown copyright Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 1995 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available from the BGS British Geological Survey Offices Sales Desk at the Survey headquarters, Keyworth, Nottingham. The more popular maps and books may be purchased from BGS- Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG approved stockists and agents and over the counter at the 0115–936 3100 Fax 0115–936 3200 Bookshop, Gallery 37, Natural History Museum (Earth Galleries), e-mail: sales @bgs.ac.uk www.bgs.ac.uk Cromwell Road, London. Sales desks are also located at the BGS BGS Internet Shop: London Information Office, and at Murchison House, Edinburgh. www.british-geological-survey.co.uk The London Information Office maintains a reference collection of BGS publications including maps for consultation. Some BGS Murchison House, West Mains Road, books and reports may also be obtained from the Stationery Office Edinburgh EH9 3LA Publications Centre or from the Stationery Office bookshops and 0131–667 1000 Fax 0131–668 2683 agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Sow and Penk Internal Drainage Board (IDB) BAP Area Monitoring
    Sow and Penk Internal Drainage Board (IDB) BAP area monitoring River Sow floodplain ©Matt Jones Baseline monitoring February 2016 Introduction The IDB has a direct capacity to exercise control over a number of watercourses within the Sow and Penk area (see Map 1), it is therefore of principal importance to suitably monitor the effect of work carried out on IDB maintained watercourses to assess its impact on the biodiversity of the wider riparian environment. To effectively monitor ecological systems in order to develop and deliver beneficial policies and practices, baseline data must be gathered to provide a benchmark to measure fluctuations in habitats or species populations over time (OECD, 2001), particularly in relation to appropriate habitat management and reducing biodiversity loss. Staffordshire Wildlife Trust has been commissioned to monitor the extent of Water vole Arvicola amphibious and Flowering-rush Butomus umbellatus to help the IDB fulfil its duty conserve biodiversity. Current baseline data A desktop study was carried out using Staffordshire Ecological Records (SER) ecological records database to output all existing records of Flowering-rush B. umbellatus and European Water Vole A. amphibious within the Sow and Penk IDB Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) area. The current available data originates from a number of sources and surveys, notably records from structured surveys and monitoring including, but not limited to Staffordshire Mammal Group surveys, structured surveys carried out by Staffordshire Wildlife Trust and surveys undertaken as part of the data collection for the Flora of Staffordshire (Hawksford, et al., 2011). This data will form a primary baseline from which data collected through future surveys can be compared to monitor populations of A.
    [Show full text]
  • Yoxall to the National Memorial Arboretum
    This leaflet can be used in conjunction with The National Forest Way OS Explorer 245 (The National Forest) The National Forest Way takes walkers on a 75-mile journey through a transforming Stage 12: landscape, from the National Memorial Arboretum in Staffordshire to Beacon Hill Country Park in Leicestershire. Yoxall to the On the way, you will discover the area’s evolution from a rural landscape, through Start National Memorial industrialisation and its decline, to the modern-day creation of a new forest, where 21st-century life is threaded through a mosaic End Arboretum of green spaces and settlements. Length: 5 miles / 8 kilometres The trail leads through young and ancient woodlands, market towns and the industrial heritage of this changing landscape. Burton upon Trent About this stage Swadlincote Start: Yoxall (DE13 8NQ) Ashby End: National Memorial Arboretum (DE13 7AR) de la Zouch Coalville On this stage, the route is never far from the River Swarbourn. You will enjoy views over the Trent Valley towards Lichfield with its prominent cathedral, passing through young woodlands and open river meadows. Visit the villages of Yoxall and Alrewas and the National Memorial Arboretum, a place of reflection and The National Forest Way was created by a remembrance. partnership of the National Forest Company, Derbyshire County Council, Leicestershire County Council and Staffordshire County The National Forest Company Council, with the generous Bath Yard, Moira, Swadlincote, support of Fisher German. Derbyshire DE12 6BA Telephone: 01283 551211 Enquiries: www.nationalforestway.co.uk/contact Website: www.nationalforest.org To find out more, visit: Photos: Jacqui Rock, Christopher Beech and www.nationalforestway.co.uk Martin Vaughan Maps reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Local Boundary Commission for England Further Electoral Review of Staffordshire Stage 1 Consultation
    Submission to the Local Boundary Commission for England Further Electoral Review of Staffordshire Stage 1 Consultation Proposals for a new pattern of divisions Produced by Peter McKenzie, Richard Cressey and Mark Sproston Contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................1 2 Approach to Developing Proposals.........................................................................1 3 Summary of Proposals .............................................................................................2 4 Cannock Chase District Council Area .....................................................................4 5 East Staffordshire Borough Council area ...............................................................9 6 Lichfield District Council Area ...............................................................................14 7 Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council Area ....................................................18 8 South Staffordshire District Council Area.............................................................25 9 Stafford Borough Council Area..............................................................................31 10 Staffordshire Moorlands District Council Area.....................................................38 11 Tamworth Borough Council Area...........................................................................41 12 Conclusions.............................................................................................................45
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Management Plan Phase 1
    Southern Staffordshire Surface Water Management Plan Phase 1 Stafford Borough, Lichfield District, Tamworth Borough, South Staffordshire District and Cannock Chase District Councils July 2010 Final Report 9V5955 CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 General Overview 1 1.2 Objectives of the SWMP 1 1.3 Scope of the SWMP 3 1.3.1 Phase 1 - Preparation 5 1.3.2 Phase 2 - Risk Assessment 5 2 ESTABLISHING A PARTNERSHIP 7 2.1 Identification of Partners 7 2.2 Roles and Responsibilities 9 2.3 Engagement Plan 10 2.4 Objectives 10 3 COLLATE AND MAP INFORMATION 11 3.1 Data Collection and Quality 11 3.1.1 Historic Flood Event Data 12 3.1.2 Future Flood Risk Data 15 3.2 Mapping and GIS 18 3.2.1 Surface Water Flooding 18 3.2.2 Flood Risk Assets 19 3.2.3 SUDS Map 19 3.2.4 Summary Sheets 20 4 STAFFORD BOROUGH 23 4.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 23 4.2 Surface Water Management 24 4.3 Recommendations 25 5 LICHFIELD DISTRICT 27 5.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 27 5.2 Surface Water Management 28 5.2.1 Canal Restoration 29 5.3 Recommendations 31 6 TAMWORTH BOROUGH 33 6.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 33 6.2 Surface Water Management 34 6.3 Recommendations 35 7 SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRE DISTRICT 37 7.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 37 7.2 Surface Water Management 38 7.2.1 Canal Restoration 39 7.3 Recommendations 41 Southern Staffordshire SWMP Phase 1 9V5955/R00003/303671/Soli Final Report -i- July 2010 8 CANNOCK CHASE DISTRICT 43 8.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 43 8.2 Surface Water Management 44 8.2.1 Canal Restoration 45 8.3 Recommendations 47 9 SELECTION OF AN APPROACH FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS
    [Show full text]
  • South Staffordshire Response Cannock Chase Council Supports
    South Staffordshire response Cannock Chase Council supports the continued positive approach to meeting wider Housing Market Area needs and acknowledgment of the necessity to reconsider the levels of provision as the quantity of the shortfall is reviewed on an ongoing basis. It is noted that this stage of the consultation covers housing growth only; is strategic in nature; and that individual site are not yet being considered. However, it is understood that the preferred strategic spatial approach will inform the future selection of development sites and broad locations are identified as part of the Preferred Spatial Strategy Option G. As part of this, it is noted that paragraph 2.7 of the consultation document states ‘the distribution of housing growth proposed in this consultation may alter to reflect specific site opportunities once these are assessed in more detail.’ Cannock Chase Council would welcome continued discussions as part of the site selection process in relation to any potential cross boundary sites and sites that lie in proximity to the Cannock Chase District boundary. It is noted that as part of the indicative preferred spatial strategy there appear to limited levels of additional housing proposed (in addition to existing allocations and safeguarded land) in areas adjacent to Cannock Chase District, primarily at Huntington and Cheslyn Hay/Great Wyrley. As outlined in the Cannock Chase District Local Plan Issues and Options (May 2019) the Council is currently considering options for accommodating its own housing needs, and potentially those of the wider HMA. The document identified that after taking into account the existing urban capacity for development, and the potential capacity arising from the former Rugeley Power Station redevelopment, there would be a shortage against the District’s own housing needs alone (before consideration of wider HMA needs).
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Report: Climate Change Mitigation & Adaptation Study
    Baseline Report Climate Change Adaptation & Mitigation Staffordshire County Council Project number: 60625972 16 October 2020 Revision 04 Baseline Report Project number: 60625972 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Harper Robertson Luke Aldred Luke Aldred Matthew Turner Senior Sustainability Associate Director Associate Director Regional Director Consultant Alice Purcell Graduate Sustainability Consultant Luke Mulvey Graduate Sustainability Consultant Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 01 20 February 2020 Skeleton Report Y Luke Associate Aldred Director 02 31 March 2020 Draft for issue Y Luke Associate Aldred Director 03 11 September 2020 Final issue Y Luke Associate Aldred Director 04 16 October 2020 Updated fuel consumption Y Luke Associate and EV charging points Aldred Director Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name Prepared for: Staffordshire County Council AECOM Baseline Report Project number: 60625972 Prepared for: Staffordshire County Council Prepared by: Harper Robertson Senior Sustainability Consultant E: [email protected] AECOM Limited Aldgate Tower 2 Leman Street London E1 8FA United Kingdom aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy for Staffordshire & Stoke-On-Trent (2007 - 2020)
    Staffordshire Waste Partnership 2013 Refresh of the Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy for Staffordshire & Stoke-on-Trent (2007 - 2020) From zero waste to landfill... ...towards a resourceful economy FROM ZERO WASTE TO LANDFILL TOWARDS A RESOURCEFUL ECONOMY Staffordshire Waste Partnership Agreement - 2013 The below councils agree to work collaboratively, as part of Staffordshire Waste Partnership, to deliver the 2013 refresh of the Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy (2013 - 2020). Signatories on behalf of each council, in agreement with the above statement: Cannock Chase District Council Councillor Signed: Print name: Carl Bennett Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Stephen Brown East Staffordshire Borough Council Councillor Signed: Print name: Dennis Fletcher Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Andy O’Brien Lichfield District Council Councillor Signed: Print name: Iain Eadie Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Diane Tilley Stafford Borough Council Councillor Signed: Print name: Frank Finlay Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Ian Thompson PAGE 2 2013 REFRESH OF THE JOINT MUNICIPAL WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR STAFFORDSHIRE & STOKE-ON-TRENT Staffordshire County Council Councillor Signed: Print name: Gill Heath Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Nick Bell Staffordshire Moorlands District Council Councillor Signed: Print name: Arthur Forrester Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Simon W. Baker Stoke-on-Trent City Council Councillor Signed: Print name: Mohammed Pervez Chief Executive Signed: Print name: John van de Laarschot South Staffordshire District Council Councillor Signed: Print name: Mary Bond Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Steve Winterflood Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council Councillor Signed: Print name: Ann Beech Chief Executive Signed: Print name: John Sellgren Tamworth Borough Council Councillor Signed: Print name: Stephen Doyle Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Tony Goodwin PAGE 3 FROM ZERO WASTE TO LANDFILL TOWARDS A RESOURCEFUL ECONOMY Contents Foreword 6 Executive Summary 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Planning Act 2008 the Willington C Gas Pipeline Examining
    The Planning Act 2008 The Willington C Gas Pipeline Examining Authority’s Report of Findings and Conclusions and Recommendation to the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change _______________________________________ Stephen Roscoe BEng MSc CEng MICE Examining Authority 2 October 2014 The Examining Authority’s findings, conclusions and recommendation in respect of an application for a Development Consent Order for a buried gas pipeline from a connection into the national gas transmission system near Yoxall in Staffordshire to the site of the proposed Willington C Power Station in Derbyshire. Report to the Secretary of State 1 Template version 0.96 This page intentionally left blank Report to the Secretary of State 1 Template version 0.96 File Ref EN060001 The application, dated 25 July 2013, was made under section 37 of the Planning Act 2008 and was received in full by The Planning Inspectorate on 30 July 2013. The applicant is RWE Npower plc. The application was accepted for examination on 22 August 2013. The examination of the application began on 11 January 2014 and was completed on 2 July 2014. The development proposed comprises a buried gas pipeline, approximately 27km in length, from a connection into the national gas transmission system near Yoxall in Staffordshire, where the development would include an above ground installation, to its termination at a block valve within the site of the proposed Willington C Power Station in Derbyshire. Summary of Recommendation: The Examining Authority recommends that the Secretary of State should make the Order in the form attached. Report to the Secretary of State 1 Template version 0.96 Section Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]