DOCSLIB.ORG

Carbon County 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Carbon County 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan Carbon County 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan Prepared for: Prepared by: Carbon County Office of Planning and Zoning Michael Baker Jr., Inc. 76 Susquehanna Street 1818 Market Street, Suite 3110 Jim Thorpe, Pennsylvania 18229-0210 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19130 Approved on: <Month Day, Year> DRAFT – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION Carbon County 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Table of Figures………………………………………………………………...v Table of Tables………………………………………………………………….vi 1. Introduction .............................................................. 1 1.1. Background ................................................................................. 1 1.2. Purpose ....................................................................................... 1 1.3. Scope ........................................................................................... 2 1.4. Authority and Reference ............................................................ 2 2. Community Profile ................................................... 4 2.1. Geography and Environment ..................................................... 4 2.2. Community Facts ........................................................................ 7 2.3. Population and Demographics .................................................. 7 2.4. Land Use and Development ....................................................... 9 2.5. Data Sources and Limitations .................................................. 12 3. Planning Process ................................................... 16 3.1. Process and Participation Summary ....................................... 16 3.2. The Planning Team ................................................................... 19 3.3. Meetings and Documentation .................................................. 20 3.4. Public & Stakeholder Participation .......................................... 21 3.5. Multi-Jurisdictional Planning ................................................... 22 3.6. Existing Planning Mechanisms ................................................ 22 4. Risk Assessment.................................................... 24 4.1. Process Summary ..................................................................... 24 4.2. Hazard Identification ................................................................. 25 4.2.1. Table of Presidential Disaster Declarations .......................................... 25 4.2.2. Summary of Hazards ............................................................................... 26 4.3. Hazard Profiles and Vulnerability Analysis ............................. 29 NATURAL HAZARDS ........................................................................... 29 4.3.1. Drought ..................................................................................................... 29 4.3.1.1. Location and Extent ............................................................................ 29 AUGUST 20, 2010 DRAFT NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION i Carbon County 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan 4.3.1.2. Range of Magnitude ............................................................................ 31 4.3.1.3. Past Occurrence ................................................................................. 33 4.3.1.4. Future Occurrence .............................................................................. 34 4.3.1.5. Vulnerability Assessment .................................................................... 36 4.3.2. Flood, Flash Flood, Ice Jam .................................................................... 38 4.3.2.1. Location and Extent ............................................................................ 38 4.3.2.2. Range of Magnitude ............................................................................ 41 4.3.2.3. Past Occurrence ................................................................................. 42 4.3.2.4. Future Occurrence .............................................................................. 48 4.3.2.5. Vulnerability Assessment .................................................................... 48 4.3.3. Hurricane, Tropical Storm, Nor’easter ................................................... 51 4.3.3.1. Location and Extent ............................................................................ 51 4.3.3.2. Range of Magnitude ............................................................................ 53 4.3.3.3. Past Occurrence ................................................................................. 54 4.3.3.4. Future Occurrence .............................................................................. 55 4.3.3.5. Vulnerability Assessment .................................................................... 57 4.3.4. Landslide .................................................................................................. 57 4.3.4.1. Location and Extent ............................................................................ 57 4.3.4.2. Range of Magnitude ............................................................................ 60 4.3.4.3. Past Occurrence ................................................................................. 60 4.3.4.4. Future Occurrence .............................................................................. 60 4.3.4.5. Vulnerability Assessment .................................................................... 60 4.3.5. Wildfire ..................................................................................................... 64 4.3.5.1. Location and Extent ............................................................................ 64 4.3.5.2. Range of Magnitude ............................................................................ 64 4.3.5.3. Past Occurrence ................................................................................. 65 4.3.5.4. Future Occurrence .............................................................................. 71 4.3.5.5. Vulnerability Assessment .................................................................... 71 4.3.6. Winter Storm ............................................................................................ 76 4.3.6.1. Location and Extent ............................................................................ 76 4.3.6.2. Range of Magnitude ............................................................................ 76 4.3.6.3. Past Occurrence ................................................................................. 79 4.3.6.4. Future Occurrence .............................................................................. 79 4.3.6.5. Vulnerability Assessment .................................................................... 80 HUMAN-MADE HAZARDS .................................................................... 81 4.3.7. Dam Failure .............................................................................................. 81 4.3.7.1. Location and Extent ............................................................................ 81 4.3.7.2. Range of Magnitude ............................................................................ 81 4.3.7.3. Past Occurrence ................................................................................. 81 4.3.7.4. Future Occurrence .............................................................................. 81 4.3.7.5. Vulnerability Assessment .................................................................... 81 4.3.8. Disorientation .......................................................................................... 81 4.3.8.1. Location and Extent ............................................................................ 81 4.3.8.2. Range of Magnitude ............................................................................ 81 4.3.8.3. Past Occurrence ................................................................................. 83 AUGUST 20, 2010 DRAFT NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION ii Carbon County 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan 4.3.8.4. Future Occurrence .............................................................................. 84 4.3.8.5. Vulnerability Assessment .................................................................... 84 4.3.9. Nuclear Incidents ..................................................................................... 84 4.3.9.1. Location and Extent ............................................................................ 84 4.3.9.2. Range of Magnitude ............................................................................ 87 4.3.9.3. Past Occurrence ................................................................................. 88 4.3.9.4. Future Occurrence .............................................................................. 88 4.3.9.5. Vulnerability Assessment .................................................................... 89 4.3.10. Transportation Accident ...................................................................... 89 4.3.10.1. Location and Extent ........................................................................... 89 4.3.10.2. Range of Magnitude ........................................................................... 90 4.3.10.3. Past Occurrence ................................................................................ 93 4.3.10.4. Future Occurrence ............................................................................. 94 4.3.10.5. Vulnerability Assessment ................................................................... 94 4.3.11. Utility Interruption ...............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SITE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION Tonolli Corporation Site Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Ecological Characterization
    APPENDIX F SITE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION Tonolli Corporation Site Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Ecological Characterization Prepared for Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. 220 Continental Drive, Suite 311 Newark, Delaware 19713 Prepared by RMC Environmental Services, Inc. 3450 Schuylkill Road Spring City, Pennsylvania 19475 March 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ........................................................... i i LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................... i1 LIST OF APPENDICES ....................................................... ii 1.0 Introduction ....................................................... 1 2.0 Site Location ....................................................... 2 3.0 Objectives of the Ecological Characterization ...................... 4 4.0 Scope .............................................................. 5 5.0 Methods ............................................................. 6 5.1 Terrestrial and Wetlands Habitat Characterization ............ 6 5.1.1 General ............................................... 6 5.1.2 Special Criteria for Wetland Identification ........... 9 5.2 Terrestrial and Wetland Fauna ................................ 12 5.3 Surface Water Resources ...................................... 12 5.3.1 Habitat Assessment .................................... 15 5.3.2 Macroinvertebrate Community ........................... 17 5.3.3 F1sh Community ........................................ 19 6.0 Findings ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane and Tropical Storm
    State of New Jersey 2014 Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 5. Risk Assessment 5.8 Hurricane and Tropical Storm 2014 Plan Update Changes The 2014 Plan Update includes tropical storms, hurricanes and storm surge in this hazard profile. In the 2011 HMP, storm surge was included in the flood hazard. The hazard profile has been significantly enhanced to include a detailed hazard description, location, extent, previous occurrences, probability of future occurrence, severity, warning time and secondary impacts. New and updated data and figures from ONJSC are incorporated. New and updated figures from other federal and state agencies are incorporated. Potential change in climate and its impacts on the flood hazard are discussed. The vulnerability assessment now directly follows the hazard profile. An exposure analysis of the population, general building stock, State-owned and leased buildings, critical facilities and infrastructure was conducted using best available SLOSH and storm surge data. Environmental impacts is a new subsection. 5.8.1 Profile Hazard Description A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] 2013a). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm
    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • Nesquehoning Creek Watershed TMDL Carbon County, Pennsylvania
    Nesquehoning Creek Watershed TMDL Carbon County, Pennsylvania Prepared by: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection August 30, 2008 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.................................................................................................................................4 Directions to the Nesquehoning Creek Watershed .....................................................................5 Segments addressed in this TMDL .............................................................................................5 Clean Water Act Requirements...................................................................................................6 303(d) List and Integrated Water Quality Report Listing Process..............................................6 Basic Steps for Determining a TMDL ........................................................................................7 Watershed History.......................................................................................................................8 AMD Methodology.....................................................................................................................9 TMDL Endpoints ......................................................................................................................11 TMDL Elements (WLA, LA, MOS).........................................................................................12 Allocation Summary .................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Half-Year Natural Catastrophe Review
    2010 HALF-YEAR NATURAL CATASTROPHE REVIEW July 7, 2010 Agenda Welcome/Introduction Terese Rosenthal U.S. Natural Catastrophe Update Carl Hedde Global Natural Catastrophe Update Dr. Peter Hoppe Economic Imppplications of Natural Catastrophe Losses Dr. Robert Hartwig Questions and Answers 2 U.S. NATURAL CATASTROPHE UPDATE Carl Hedde, SVP, Head of Risk Accumulation Munich Reinsurance America, Inc. MR NatCatSERVICE One of the world‘s largest databases on natural catastrophes The Database Today From 1980 until to day a ll loss events; for USA and selected countries in Europe all loss events since 1970. Retrospectively, all great disasters since 1950. In addition, all major historical events starting from 79 AD – erupp(,tion of Mt. Vesuvio (3,000 historical data sets). Currently more than 28,000 events © 2010 Munich Re 4 U.S. Natural Catastrophe Update 2010 Headlines Series of winter storms in the Mid-Atlantic and New England states create highest peril losses since 2003. Late start to thunderstorm season; one of the lowest YTD insured losses over the past 10 years. Major floods in Tennessee and Rhode Island. Two powerful earthquakes affect California, but limited damage due to remote locations. Seasonal forecasts indicate “active to very active” hurricane season; Potential development of La Niña conditions may be a factor. © 2010 Munich Re 5 U.S. Natural Catastrophe Update Insured Natural Disasters Losses in the United States First Six Months of 2010 Estimated Overall Estimated Insured As of June 30, 2010 Fatalities Losses (US $m) Losses (US $m) Severe 28 5,230 3,006 Thunderstorms Winter Storm 25 3,500 2,385 Flood 50 2, 367 609 Earthquake 0 200 125 Tropical Cyclone 0 Minor Minor Wildfire 0 9 0 Source: MR NatCatSERVICE © 2010 Munich Re 6 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water and Groundwater Withdrawal and Water Exportation Packer, Lehigh, Lausanne Townships, Carbon County, and Hazle Township, Luzerne County Pennsylvania
    DOCKET NO. D-1991-065 CP-4 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION Drainage Area to the Special Protection Waters Hazleton City Authority Surface Water and Groundwater Withdrawal and Water Exportation Packer, Lehigh, Lausanne Townships, Carbon County, and Hazle Township, Luzerne County Pennsylvania PROCEEDINGS This docket is issued in response to an Application submitted to the Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC or Commission) on January 13, 2016, amended June 11, 2020 for renewal and an increase of an allocation of surface water and groundwater and review of a water withdrawal project (Application). The Buck Mountain Well was approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) on December 18, 1991, (Permit No. 1391503). The Dreck Creek and Hudsondale Sources were approved by the PADEP on November 23, 1981 (Water Allocation Permit No. WA-184). The discharge of water from the Lehigh River to the Dreck Creek Reservoir was approved by PADEP (NPDES Permit No. PA0063011) on January 8, 2019. PADEP approval for the increase of allocation from the Lehigh River is pending. The Application was reviewed for continued inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan and for approval under Section 3.8 of the Delaware River Basin Compact. The Carbon County and Luzerne County Planning Commissions have been notified of pending action on this docket. A public hearing on this project was held by the DRBC on February 10, 2021. A. DESCRIPTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this docket is to approve an increase in water withdrawal allocation from 2.5 mgd to 5.0 mgd from the existing Lehigh River intake and renew the approval of water withdrawal allocations of 3.60 million gallons per day (mgd) of water from Quakake Creek and Biesels Run combined (collectively referred to as the Hudsondale Sources), 4.75 mgd from the Dreck Creek Reservoir and 3.72 million gallons per month (mgm) from Buck Mountain Well No.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding for Packery Channel Repairs Was Tentatively Flour Bluff ISD Had an Enrollment Packery Repairs Cont
    Inside the Moon Artist of the Month A2 Demolition Continues A5 Ullberg A7 Traveling Moon A9 Mushrooms A14 Live Music A16 Issue 905 The 27° 37' 0.5952'' N | 97° 13' 21.4068'' W Island Free The voiceMoon of The Island since 1996 August 19, 2021 Weekly www.islandmoon.com FREE Photo by Riekie Roncinske Photo by Evelyn Pless-Schuberth From The Island to ABC Islander to make debut on Grey’s By Dale Rankin Anatomy Apparently Hurricane Grace really September 30 likes Mexico. By Dale Rankin So much so that she is making two trips there this week first midweek Islanders tuning into the premier of in the Yucatan Peninsula and then by the 18th season of Grey’s Anatomy week’s end to Túxpam, which in the on Thursday, September 30 will see language of the Aztecs means “Place a familiar face. of Rabbits”, a compound of tochtli Beach wedding. “rabbit” and -pan “place.” That should work out okay because as everyone knows your average rabbit can easily outrun a hurricane. According to the Weather Wonks landfall is Funding for Packery expected to be well south of South Texas but they say our beaches will likely get rough seas potentially life- threatening conditions with rough Channel Repairs waves and dangerous rip currents. Not there is really any discernable City officials awaiting final paperwork pattern anymore but over the last five or so decades our hurricanes have By Dale Rankin tended to come about this time or later in the season but moved from After almost four years of wrangling the early alphabet – Carla 1961, Allen with federal authorizes over funds to 1980, Celia 1970, Beulah 1967 - to a repair damage to the Packery Jetties Michael Gazin.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Oral Abstracts
    Abstracts of Oral Presentations (by day and session) Tuesday, February 2, 2016 1:30 PM - 5:00 PM Incorporating an Ecosystem Services Approach into Restoration and Coastal Management 1:30 PM - 1:45 PM A Place for People at the Restoration Table D. Boesch University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD Ecosystem services are anthropocentric. They are the benefits that humans receive from the natural environment. Yet, do we really consider the potential impact on human well-being as we plan, execute, and monitor restoration and conservation projects? And if we are, is there a real connection between the biophysical structure, function, and processes to ecosystem services and then human well-being? There currently exists a significant opportunity in the Gulf of Mexico to change the way we conduct our "restoration" business. Ecosystem services can play a role in selection among project alternatives but more importantly it can help elucidate the benefits of restoration and be a measure of the "impact of investment" that is being made. 1:45 PM - 2:00 PM The Gulf of Mexico as a Hub for Ecosystem Service Science-Driven Policy C. Shepard; The Nature Conservancy, Punta Gorda, FL The Gulf of Mexico’s coastal and marine ecosystems provide a wide range of services that benefit people and nature. Reestablishing these ecosystem services and protecting the habitats that provide them is key to rebuilding the region’s economic, ecological and social vitality. The Deepwater Horizon disaster has brought much needed scientific and political attention to the state of the Gulf of Mexico’s ecosystems and the services they provide.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe Girds for Afghan Refugee Crisis
    baseball boxing Page 16 Page 15 THE FIRST ENGLISH LANGUAGE DAILY IN FREE KUWAIT Established in 1977 / www.arabtimesonline.com MONDAY, AUGUST 23, 2021 / MUHARRAM 15, 1443 AH emergency number 112 NO. 17770 16 PAGES 150 FILS Europe girds for Afghan refugee crisis Talks termed ‘necessary’ Kabul crush kills 7 HANGEDIGI, Turkey, Aug 22, (AP): From above, Amir, Iraqi PM discuss trade the new border wall separating Turkey from Iran looks like a white snake winding through the bar- By Ahmed Al-Jarallah According to a statement issued by the ren hills. So far it only covers a third of the 540-ki- Editor-in-Chief, the Arab Times Iraqi Foreign Ministry, despite the main theme of the one-day visit being “increas- lometer (335-mile) border, leaving plenty of gaps KUWAIT CITY, Aug 22: In light of the ing the volume of trade between the two for migrants to slip across in the dead of night. accelerating international and regional countries and attracting investments”, the Traffic on this key migration route from central Asia to Europe developments, and in anticipation of the focus was mainly on several political is- “Baghdad Summit of the Leaders of Iraq sues during the meeting. has remained relatively stable and Neighboring Countries” scheduled His Highness the Amir welcomed the compared to previous years. for next month, the Prime Minister of Iraq Iraqi Prime Minister and his accompany- But European countries, as Mustafa Al-Kadhemi arrived in Kuwait ing delegation, and expressed his wish to Newswatch well as Turkey, fear the sud- on an official visit, which is his first visit strengthen the cooperation between the two den return of Taliban rule in since taking office in April 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • AIR Brief: Implications of the Gulf Oil Spill for the Upcoming Hurricane Season
    AIR Brief: Implications of the Gulf Oil Spill for the Upcoming Hurricane Season May 27, 2010 AIR Brief: Implications of the Gulf Oil Spill Background The current oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico followed soon after a large explosion on the Deepwater Horizon oil drilling platform, 50 miles off the Louisiana Coast, on April 20. The rig, which in AIR’s offshore exposure database has a replacement value of $560 million, was a fifth generation semi-submersible, self propelled and equipped with dynamic positioning system. Eleven workers lost their lives in the blast, but it was initially thought that no oil was spilling. Four days after the explosion, spotters noticed signs of an oil leak, and it was soon estimated that as much as 5,000 barrels of crude oil a day were escaping into the Gulf. Subsequent underwater videos and ship-based studies called into question the estimated flow rate of the leak, however, suggesting it may be many times higher.1 Initial capping efforts were not successful, and while subsequent procedures were able to siphon off some of the flow, little real progress has been made. That may change with BP’s latest effort, which began on May 26, to plug and seal the well using heavy mud and cement in a procedure called ‚top kill‛.2 The timing of this spill means that a potentially important, additional complicating factor may come into play. North Atlantic hurricane season officially begins on June 1, and with seas 2 to 3 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than normal in the northern Gulf of Mexico3, the possibility of a tropical storm or hurricane on top of this oil spill becomes very real.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-02-02 010515__2021 Stocking Schedule All.Pdf
    Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission 2021 Trout Stocking Schedule (as of 2/1/2021, visit fishandboat.com/stocking for changes) County Water Sec Stocking Date BRK BRO RB GD Meeting Place Mtg Time Upper Limit Lower Limit Adams Bermudian Creek 2 4/6/2021 X X Fairfield PO - SR 116 10:00 CRANBERRY ROAD BRIDGE (SR1014) Wierman's Mill Road Bridge (SR 1009) Adams Bermudian Creek 2 3/15/2021 X X X York Springs Fire Company Community Center 10:00 CRANBERRY ROAD BRIDGE (SR1014) Wierman's Mill Road Bridge (SR 1009) Adams Bermudian Creek 4 3/15/2021 X X York Springs Fire Company Community Center 10:00 GREENBRIAR ROAD BRIDGE (T-619) SR 94 BRIDGE (SR0094) Adams Conewago Creek 3 4/22/2021 X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 SR0234 BRDG AT ARENDTSVILLE 200 M DNS RUSSELL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) Adams Conewago Creek 3 2/27/2021 X X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 SR0234 BRDG AT ARENDTSVILLE 200 M DNS RUSSELL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) Adams Conewago Creek 4 4/22/2021 X X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 200 M DNS RUSSEL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) RT 34 BRDG (SR0034) Adams Conewago Creek 4 10/6/2021 X X Letterkenny Reservoir 10:00 200 M DNS RUSSEL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) RT 34 BRDG (SR0034) Adams Conewago Creek 4 2/27/2021 X X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 200 M DNS RUSSEL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) RT 34 BRDG (SR0034) Adams Conewago Creek 5 4/22/2021 X X Adams Co.
    [Show full text]