DOCSLIB.ORG

Jefferson Memorial Accessibility Ramps

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THOMAS JEFFERSON MEMORIAL Submission to the National Capital Planning Commission for March 29, 2019 Project Overview Description of Project Area The Thomas Jefferson Memorial is located at 701 E NCPC Plans and Policies Basin Drive SW. The site of the Memorial is located in Comprehensive Plan for the National Capital West Potomac Park on the shore of the Potomac River Tidal Basin. This project is in line with the Comprehensive Plan for the National Capital (2016), specifically the Parks & Based on the McMillan Plan, the famous architect Open Space Element. The project complies with the John Russell Pope designed a monolithic pantheon, following policies: which faces towards the White House. The site for the Memorial was low, swampy land created from fill from • Preserve and maintain cultural landscapes, river dredging. including their natural and constructed elements. The Tidal Basin flanks the north and the west side • Protect or restore viewsheds that contribute to of the Memorial. To the south of the Memorial is the cultural landscapes and the aesthetic quality, busy, heavily traveled East Basin Drive SW. This road is historic significance and visitor experience of the traveled by pedestrians, buses, bicyclists, tour groups, parks and open space system. etc. The main point of access to the Memorial for most • Protect the image of Washington, along with visitors traveling via vehicle is from the south of the the lighting hierarchy established by iconic civil Memorial. The east of the Memorial is a wooded area landmarks including the U.S. Capital, White House, that is filled with paths to the Memorial. Pedestrians Washington Monument, Lincoln Memorial and traveling to the Memorial will most likely enter the site Jefferson Memorial. from the east. All aspects of the project are in line with the Historic Proposed Program Preservation Element of the Comprehensive Plan for The project intends to improve physical accessibility the National Capital (2016). The project goals align with throughout the Thomas Jefferson Memorial from entry the following policies: to exit by implementing principles of Universal Design. The project specifically focuses on creating an improved • Sustain exemplary standards of historic property accessible route from the Tidal Basin Plaza Level to the stewardship. Chamber Level. • Use historic properties for their original purpose. Previous Commission Contents • Ensure the continued preservation of federal The Commission previously reviewed the project in historic properties through ongoing maintenance. March of 2018, where it received concept approval. The comments from the Commission during this review • Ensure that new construction is compatible with were as follows: the qualities and character of historic buildings and their settings, in accordance with the Secretary • The Commission supports the applicants proposed of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment targeted accessibility improvements at the Thomas of Historic Properties and the Guidelines for Jefferson Memorial, consisting of two ramps on the Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. north side of the Memorial to improve accessibility for all visitors. • Work cooperatively with local, state and federal agencies to ensure that development adjacent • The Commission notes that the Thomas Jefferson to historic properties does not detract from their Memorial currently only has one accessible route to historic character, and is compatible with the the Statuary Chamber Level, which requires visitors surrounding context. arriving from the north to use a ramp on the south side of the Memorial and traverse back to access • Plan carefully for appropriate and compatible the Lower Level entrances. design in and near the monumental core to protect and preserve the nation's key historic properties. • The Commission recommends the applicant continue to explore their preferred design of new GWWO, Inc./Architects I accessible ramps on the north side of the Memorial Detailed Project Information and Drawings outside the existing historic planters on the Tidal Basin Plaza Level. Buildings The Thomas Jefferson Memorial is the nation's As NCPC noted, the design team has continued to monument to its third president. Originally designed explore and detail the preferred design. by architect John Russell Pope, the neoclassical landmark sits on the edge of the Tidal Basin. The Proposed Schedule structure includes circular marble steps, a portico, Construction documents are scheduled to be completed a circular colonnade, and a shallow open-air dome. in May 2019. Currently the project is not funded so there In 1939, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt laid is no anticipated date of construction. the cornerstone, and the monument was officially Project Cost Estimate dedicated in 1943. It has since become a national The National Park Service is not releasing the cost landmark and in 1966 it was listed on the National estimate at this time. Register of Historic Places. Site Plan Outreach and Coordination See attached drawings for Site Plan and Landscape Plan. Public Engagement NPS held a public meeting on November 16, 2017 at Vicinity Map the American Association of People with Disabilities to See attached document. share the accessibility project at Jefferson Memorial. The attendees generally agreed with the design Landscape and Grading Plan approaches discussed during the meeting. See attached document. It was found that the project has no adverse effect Elevation on the historic properties. The Assessment of Effects See attached document. Report is included with the project documentation. The Because the sloped walkways are not connected to the State Historic Preservation Officer concurred with the building, there is no change to the existing building NPS determination that the project will have no adverse massing or elevation. effect on the historic properties. Cross Sections Coordination with Federal, State and Local See attached document. Jurisdictions The project team is working with DC DOEE to Security understand the stormwater requirements for the No technology security changes are anticipated as part project. The design team reviewed the project with a of this project. DOEE representative on site on May 30, 2018. The United States Park Police (USPP) s responsible Based on the initial conversation with the DC DOEE, the for protecting the Thomas Jefferson Memorial. With team understands that the areas that will be required the construction of the proposed walkways, the USPP to comply with stormwater requirements are the sloped will have to monitor areas that were not previously walkways which are considered new impervious area. occupied by the public. The project team has been coordinating with the USPP. The areas where concrete replacement is necessary to improve the accessible route will be considered existing Photographs impervious area - "maintenance" and will be excluded See attached document. from the stormwater requirements obligation. Transportation and Circulation The team is in the process of scheduling a meeting with No changes are proposed for transportation access to DC DOEE to confirm these requirements. the site. No additional parking is proposed for the site. II GWWO, Inc./Architects The existing site has multiple levels that are part of the Public Realm and View Sheds accessible path, including the lowest level: the Tidal The landscape design includes minimal impact to the Basin Plaza Level, and the next level: the Lower Terrace cultural landscape. Where modifications are necessary, Level. The current accessible route requires a visitor the proposed design represents the original landscape (traveling from the south of the Memorial) to choose to design by Frederick Law Olmstead, Jr. access one of the two levels as listed above. From the north side of the building (at the Tidal Basin)there is no To accommodate the sloped walkways, the upright accessible connection between the two levels. Japanese Yews on both sides of the Memorial require removal and replacement. The proposed planting The project intends to connect the two levels of the include a massing of Upright Japanese Yew plantings Memorial so a visitor does not have to travel fully (Taxus cuspidata capitata) that flank both sides of the around the Memorial multiple times to be able to steps on the north side of the Memorial that consist experience all aspects of the Memorial. The project of three plants each (5-6 ! in height). The proposed connects the Tidal Basin Plaza Level and the Lower planting locations represent the original landscape Terrace Level at the Tidal Basin. design in this location. The existing Japanese Zelkovas will need to be removed. The National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory from 2004 noted that Environmental and Historical the Zelkovas will not be replaced when they die or if Considerations removed for proposed improvements. The existing Zelkovas provide shade for the lawn area where the Historic Preservation sloped walkways will be constructed. Removal of the The primary project approach is rehabilitation. Zelkovas will allow more light to reach the sloped The design approach for this project has been to walkways. balance minimizing impacts to historic fabric with the On the Lower Terrace Level, the proposed walkway need to provide visitor access to a larger number of requires minimal removal of select plant material at visitors. The design decisions have worked towards the the holly hedge. Approximately a ten by ten foot area goals of minimizing impacts to the existing
Recommended publications
  • During Track Work And/Or Rail Shutdown Events, This Bus Stop Will Also Be Served by Metro Shuttle Buses. NOTE

    During Track Work And/Or Rail Shutdown Events, This Bus Stop Will Also Be Served by Metro Shuttle Buses. NOTE

    – Bus Service from Union Station Silver Spring Eastern Ave BUS BOARDING MAP BUS SERVICE AND BOARDING LOCATIONS schematic map The table shows approximate minutes between buses; check schedules for full details LEGEND not to scale 16th St BOARD AT MONDAY TO FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY Rail Lines Metrobus Routes t t S ROUTE DESTINATION BUS STOP AM RUSH MIDDAY PM RUSH EVENING DAY EVENING DAY EVENING t S L G d t S n s l Metrobus Major Route 2 80 1 o ARLINGTON-UNION STATION LINE t Frequent, seven-day service on the core i Metrorail H St p H St route. On branches, service levels vary. a 13Y Ronald Reagan Washington Nat’l Airport m -- -- -- -- 30* -- 30* -- Station and Line C B h D6 Metrobus Local Route Alaska Ave t M r F Less frequent service, with some evening o NORTH CAPITOL ST LINE and weekend service available. N G Pl Union Station 80 Fort Totten m 8-15 15 10 30 30 30 30 30 X1 Metrobus Commuter Route Takoma Government EF Printing Office H Parking Peak-hour service linking residential areas Garage 80 Kennedy Center 14-20 30 20-30 30 30 30 30 30 Commuter to rail stations and employment centers. Georgia Ave GN G St G St Railroad Western Ave Bethesda X9 MetroExtra Route 80 McPherson Sq m 14-20 30 20-30 -- -- -- -- -- Transfer National Bureau of GN Limited stops for a faster ride. Days, times Guard Labor Statistics t Q Points S and service levels vary by route. EAST CAPITOL ST LINE Memorial t N s M 1 as E sa 96 Tenleytown-AU m 20 24 21 33 25-30 30-35 30-35 30-35 Map Symbols Routes Operated by ch J us National ett City/County Systems s A Postal 96
  • Ford's Theatre National Historic Site Scope of Collection Statement

    Ford's Theatre National Historic Site Scope of Collection Statement

    DEPARTMENT OFTHE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE FORD'S THEATRE NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE Scope of Collection Statement Recommended by: _________________________________________________________________________ Bob Sonderman, Regional Curator, National Capital Region Catherine Dewey, Chief of Resource Management, National Mall and Memorial Parks Prepared by:_______________________________________________________________________________ Mark Nelson, CESU Project Staff, Museum Resource Center Elena Popchock, CESU Project Staff, Museum Resource Center Reviewed by:______________________________________________________________________________ Laura Anderson, Museum Curator, National Mall and Memorial Parks Renny Bergeron, Supervisory Museum Curator, National Capital Region Approved by:______________________________________________________________________________ Gay Vietzke, Superintendent, National Mall and Memorial Parks TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 A. Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................1 B. Purpose of the Scope of Collection Statement ............................................................................2 C. Legislation Related to the National Park Service Museum Collections .....................................2 D. Site History, Significance, Purpose, Themes and Goals ..........................................................
  • The American Lawn: Culture, Nature, Design and Sustainability

    The American Lawn: Culture, Nature, Design and Sustainability

    THE AMERICAN LAWN: CULTURE, NATURE, DESIGN AND SUSTAINABILITY _______________________________________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University _______________________________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Landscape Architecture _______________________________________________________________________________ by Maria Decker Ghys May 2013 _______________________________________________________________________________ Accepted by: Dr. Matthew Powers, Committee Chair Dr. Ellen A. Vincent, Committee Co-Chair Professor Dan Ford Professor David Pearson ABSTRACT This was an exploratory study examining the processes and underlying concepts of design nature, and culture necessary to discussing sustainable design solutions for the American lawn. A review of the literature identifies historical perceptions of the lawn and contemporary research that links lawns to sustainability. Research data was collected by conducting personal interviews with green industry professionals and administering a survey instrument to administrators and residents of planned urban development communi- ties. Recommended guidelines for the sustainable American lawn are identified and include native plant usage to increase habitat and biodiversity, permeable paving and ground cover as an alternative to lawn and hierarchical maintenance zones depending on levels of importance or use. These design recommendations form a foundation
  • Presidents and American Symbols

    Presidents and American Symbols

    KINDERGARTEN Core Knowledge Language Arts® • New York Edition • Listening & Learning™ Strand Presidents and American Symbols American and Presidents Tell It Again!™ Read-Aloud Anthology Read-Aloud Again!™ It Tell Presidents and American Symbols Tell It Again!™ Read-Aloud Anthology Listening & Learning™ Strand KINDERGARTEN Core Knowledge Language Arts® New York Edition Creative Commons Licensing This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work to Remix — to adapt the work Under the following conditions: Attribution — You must attribute the work in the following manner: This work is based on an original work of the Core Knowledge® Foundation made available through licensing under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. This does not in any way imply that the Core Knowledge Foundation endorses this work. Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. With the understanding that: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Copyright © 2013 Core Knowledge Foundation www.coreknowledge.org All Rights Reserved. Core Knowledge Language Arts is a trademark of the Core Knowledge Foundation. Trademarks and trade names are shown in this book strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and are the property of their respective owners.
  • Blueprintsvolume XXVII, No

    Blueprintsvolume XXVII, No

    blueprintsVolume XXVII, No. 1–2 NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM In Between: The Other Pieces of the Green Puzzle in this issue: HEALTHY Communities, GREEN Communities Word s ,Word s ,Word s Winter & Spring 2008/2009 The Lay of the Landscape Annual Report 2008 in this issue... 2 8 13 18 19 21 23 In Between: The Other Pieces of the Green Puzzle The exhibition Green Community calls attention to important aspects of sustainable design and planning that are sometimes overshadowed by eye-catching works of architecture. The environmental implications of transportation systems, public services, recreational spaces, and other elements of infrastructure must be carefully considered in order to create responsible and livable communities. This issue of Blueprints focuses on the broad environmental imperative from the standpoints of public health, urban and town planning, and landscape architecture. Contents Healthy Communities, ! 2 Green Communities M Cardboard Reinvented Physician Howard Frumkin, of the Centers for Disease Cardboard: one person’s trash is another Control and Prevention, brings his diverse expertise as B an internist, an environmental and occupational health N person’s decorative sculpture, pen and pencil expert, and an epidemiologist to bear on the public health holder, vase, bowl, photo and business card holder, above: Beaverton Round, in suburban Portland, Oregon, was built as part of the metropolitan area’s Transit-Oriented Development Program. implications of community design and planning. p Photo courtesy of the American Planning Association and Portland Metro. stress toy, or whatever you can imagine. Bring out your o Creating Sustainable Landscapes creativity with these durable, versatile, eco-friendly LIQUID h CARDBOARD vases that can be transformed into a myriad from the executive director 8 In an interview, landscape architect Len Hopper discusses s his profession’s inherent commitment to sustainability and of shapes for a variety of uses in your home.
  • Building Stones of the National Mall

    Building Stones of the National Mall

    The Geological Society of America Field Guide 40 2015 Building stones of the National Mall Richard A. Livingston Materials Science and Engineering Department, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA Carol A. Grissom Smithsonian Museum Conservation Institute, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland 20746, USA Emily M. Aloiz John Milner Associates Preservation, 3200 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22207, USA ABSTRACT This guide accompanies a walking tour of sites where masonry was employed on or near the National Mall in Washington, D.C. It begins with an overview of the geological setting of the city and development of the Mall. Each federal monument or building on the tour is briefly described, followed by information about its exterior stonework. The focus is on masonry buildings of the Smithsonian Institution, which date from 1847 with the inception of construction for the Smithsonian Castle and continue up to completion of the National Museum of the American Indian in 2004. The building stones on the tour are representative of the development of the Ameri­ can dimension stone industry with respect to geology, quarrying techniques, and style over more than two centuries. Details are provided for locally quarried stones used for the earliest buildings in the capital, including A quia Creek sandstone (U.S. Capitol and Patent Office Building), Seneca Red sandstone (Smithsonian Castle), Cockeysville Marble (Washington Monument), and Piedmont bedrock (lockkeeper's house). Fol­ lowing improvement in the transportation system, buildings and monuments were constructed with stones from other regions, including Shelburne Marble from Ver­ mont, Salem Limestone from Indiana, Holston Limestone from Tennessee, Kasota stone from Minnesota, and a variety of granites from several states.
  • Private Event Rental Policy

    Private Event Rental Policy

    Hosting a Party at Thomas Jefferson’s Poplar Forest A Guidebook Table of Contents Introduction Poplar Forest Rental Policy Rental Fees Required Procedures and Restrictions Alcohol and Beverages Catering Requirements Children Decorations Deliveries, Curfews, Set Up, and Clean Up Fees and Cancellations Inclement Weather Insurance Invitations, Publicity, and Photography Music Parking Pets Smoking Restrooms Weddings and Rehearsals Approved Supplier List/Rental Questionnaire Facilities Use Agreement Map and Directions Introduction to Renting Poplar Forest Poplar Forest is, first and foremost, a historic site and national landmark. Thomas Jefferson’s Poplar Forest is owned and operated by a nonprofit group formed in 1983, to rescue the buildings and grounds for the educational and cultural benefit of the public. It has historic structures and grounds, which require special care to preserve and protect for future research and visitors. Poplar Forest may be rented for events but with the understanding that requirements differ from those of a hotel, country club, or restaurant. Poplar Forest is a preservation work in progress. It is common to have restoration and archaeological work in progress throughout the year. Poplar Forest cannot guarantee the site will appear exactly or in any other condition as when the contract is signed. It is important that you carefully read the procedures and policies before signing the rental contract. This rental guide is intended to answer questions in regard to hosting an event at Poplar Forest. After reading this guide in its entirety, if you feel Poplar Forest is a good match for your event, please contact Elise Paisant, Programs and Events Coordinator at 434-534-8110 or [email protected] to check the availability for your desired date and time.
  • The White House the American Bald Eagle Images of Liberty U.S

    The White House the American Bald Eagle Images of Liberty U.S

    Additional titles filmideas,Inc. from filmideas,Inc. Presents in the SYMBOLS OF AMERICA 5 PART SERIES Uncle Sam The White House The American Bald Eagle Images of Liberty U.S. Flag 5PartSeries The Film Ideas,Inc. 308 North Wolf Rd. Wheeling, IL 60090 TEL: 1-800-475-3456 or 847-419-0255 FAX: 847-419-8933 E-MAIL: [email protected] HOUSEHOUSE WEB SITE: www.filmideas.com INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE Copyright © 2002 INTRODUCTION TO SERIES The purpose of this video series is to acquaint young children to the importance of American symbols. It is designed to teach how symbols are objects or pic- tures that represents a much larger idea. Throughout American history symbols have played a significant role in how ideas have become an influential fabric of our culture. American symbols represent and com- municate who we are and what we value as a socie- ty. As children learn the importance of symbolism they will understand their contribution to American history and how symbols have evolved to help shape and define a nation – The United States of America. As a complementary device with each video, an instructional guide suggests exercises to help aid teachers, parents and students. These interactive exercises will reinforce and further develop a child’s level of comprehension about the importance of sym- bols and the joy of learning. 5PartSeries The instructional guide provides: Child-friendly exercises! Fun-to-do follow-up activities! Easy-to-learn reinforcement Q & A! Permission granted to copy the E-Guidesavailableat exercises provided in this guide. www.filmideas.com For educational use ONLY.
  • Historical Information Sheet for a UGS Trial Tour Ü You Are Not Required to Know Or Include Every Fact on This Sheet

    Historical Information Sheet for a UGS Trial Tour Ü You Are Not Required to Know Or Include Every Fact on This Sheet

    Historical Information Sheet for a UGS Trial Tour ü You are not required to know or include every fact on this sheet. Please spend more time practicing your trial tour than memorizing every fact. It’s impossible to include all this in a 15 min. tour anyway. ü You are encouraged to observe an actual historical tour. Then pick the facts and stories from both the tour and this factsheet that interest you to craft a unique, cohesive tour that shows off your personality. ü Feel free to include material from your own independent research, but that is certainly not obligatory. I. The Founding of the University Jefferson, as part of his lifelong pursuit for the advancement of public education, sought to found a new university based on “the illimitable freedom of the human mind,” where any subject imaginable could be studied. 1816 Central College, Jefferson’s original plan for an institution of higher education in Charlottesville (so named due to its proposed location at the then geographic center of the state of Virginia), is chartered. 1817 Construction of Central College began when, in the presence of Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and James Monroe, the cornerstone of Pavilion VII was laid. 1818 The Virginia General Assembly passed a bill to charter a state university. 1819 The University of Virginia is founded when Central College is selected as the site for the state university. 1825 On March 7, the first students arrive for classes, and Jefferson lives to see “the hobby of [his] old age” open its doors. 1826 Jefferson, and coincidentally John Adams, both die on July 4, the 50th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.
  • 2021 Washington, D.C. and Williamsburg, VA and Charlottesville, VA Trip

    2021 Washington, D.C. and Williamsburg, VA and Charlottesville, VA Trip

    2021 Washington, D.C. and Williamsburg, VA and Charlottesville, VA Trip Dear Parents and Students, I am excited to announce that I will lead a group of Dean Leaman Junior High School students on a WorldStrides program to Washington, D.C., Williamsburg, VA and Charlottesville, VA. On this once-in-a-lifetime adventure, students will explore our nation's most important historical sites and experience incomparable learning moments. This will be a trip that your child will be talking about for years to come! Your child will return home excited to tell you about: Standing where Martin Luther King, Jr., delivered his “I Have a Dream” speech at the Lincoln Memorial Discovering the true meaning of sacrifice at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier Walking in the footsteps of our great leaders on Capitol Hill Exploring numerous Smithsonian Museums, like the National Museum of Natural History and the National Air and Space Museum I have chosen to travel with WorldStrides because of their exceptional service, their 50 years of experience, their safety record, and their preventive measures that ensure learning occurs in a safe and fun environment. I have led this trip for many years now and look forward to leading it again. I will chaperone the program with other teachers as needed, and throughout the program our group will be guided by a WorldStrides-certified Course Leader. Since this is not a school sponsored trip, we will not be attending as representatives or employees of the school. Please read through all the details of this letter including a sample itinerary on the back of this page, and visit www.worldstrides.com/signup for more details about WorldStrides and our group's trip.
  • KEVIN F. CORDON : : Defendant

    KEVIN F. CORDON : : Defendant

    Case 1:21-cr-00277-TNM Document 27 Filed 08/27/21 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Case No: 21-cr-277 : : : 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1) : v. : : KEVIN F. CORDON : : Defendant. : : STATEMENT OF OFFENSE Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, the United States of America, by and through its attorney, the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, and the defendant, Kevin F. Cordon, with the concurrence of his attorney, agree and stipulate to the below factual basis for the defendant’s guilty plea—that is, if this case were to proceed to trial, the parties stipulate that the United States could prove the below facts beyond a reasonable doubt: The Attack at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 1. The U.S. Capitol, which is located at First Street, SE, in Washington, D.C., is secured 24 hours a day by U.S. Capitol Police. Restrictions around the U.S. Capitol include permanent and temporary security barriers and posts manned by U.S. Capitol Police. Only authorized people with appropriate identification are allowed access inside the U.S. Capitol. 2. On January 6, 2021, the exterior plaza of the U.S. Capitol was closed to members of the public. 1 Case 1:21-cr-00277-TNM Document 27 Filed 08/27/21 Page 2 of 5 3. On January 6, 2021, a joint session of the United States Congress convened at the United States Capitol, which is located at First Street, SE, in Washington, D.C.
  • Where the Lawn Mower Stops: the Social Construction of Alternative Front Yard Ideologies

    Where the Lawn Mower Stops: the Social Construction of Alternative Front Yard Ideologies

    Kaufman, A. J. and Lohr. V. I. 2002. Where the lawn mower stops: The social construction of alternative front yard ideologies. In: C. A. Shoemaker (Editor), Interaction by design: bringing people and plants together for health and well being (An international symposium). Iowa State Press. Pp. 291-300. Where the lawn mower stops: The social construction of alternative front yard ideologies Andrew J. Kaufman Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA 96822 Virginia I. Lohr Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA 99164-6414 Introduction Visit just about any American neighborhood from coast to coast, and more often than not, you will see a unifying theme of front yards with green, well-maintained lawns. The lawn has truly become an American icon. In addition to being in almost every residential setting, it appears in business parks, shopping centers, public parks, and athletic facilities. Lawns cover approximately thirty million acres in the United States (Jenkins 1994). In Iowa, the lawns of an estimated 870,878 single-family homes cover 592,000 acres, which equates to roughly 7,500 square feet of lawn per urban residence (Iowa Turfgrass Industry 2001). This patch of green carpet seems to be woven into, not only the American psyche, but the American social fabric as a whole. When asked what percentage of homes in central Iowa have a front lawn, an industry representative replied, “There is no percentage, just about everyone does” (Iowa Turfgrass Industry 2001). Having a front yard with a well-maintained lawn in the United States is the norm, yet not everyone goes along with it.