DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Comments Received

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Comments Received NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE LEGISLATIVE BUILDING 16 W. Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-1030 March 5, 2020 Jamille Robbins NC Department of Transportation– Environmental Analysis Unit 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 Submitted via email: [email protected] Re: Modernization of outdoor advertising rules 19A NCAC 02E .0225 To the NC Department of Transportation, We are North Carolina legislators who care about the scenic beauty of our state and We are writing to oppose the proposed changes to the modernization of outdoor advertising rules (19A NCAC 02E .0225) that would limit local ordinances and allow billboards with a state permit to be converted to digital and raised to 50 feet in height, even if such changes are not allowed by the applicable city or county ordinance. Instead, we support the considered “Alternative 2” described in the agency’s March 1, 2019, fiscal note. Alternative 2 would recognize local government ordinances and limit the changes that could be made to an existing billboard as part of modernization. Alternative 2 as described in the fiscal note: “The second alternate is to further limit activities that industry could do as part of modernization. An example includes restricting companies to modernize from static to digital faces. Some local governments have more stringent rules associated with outdoor advertising regulations including moratoriums on allowing digital billboards. NCDOT considered excluding digital faces as part of modernization. NCDOT chose not to make this exclusion since the state already allows digital billboards and that industry should be allowed to accommodate for technology enhancements.” We wish to protect the ability of local communities to control billboards, especially taller, digitized billboards that impact the scenic beauty of North Carolina and can be a distraction to drivers. Thank you, Sen. Kirk deViere Rep. Becky Carney Sen. Valerie Foushee Rep. Christy Clark Sen. Michael Garrett Rep. Terence Everitt Sen. Natasha R. Marcus Rep. Susan C. Fisher Sen. Wiley Nickel Rep. Wesley Harris Sen. Harper Peterson Rep. Pricey Harrison Sen. Gladys A. Robinson Rep. Zack Hawkins Sen. Sam Searcy Rep. Yvonne Lewis Holley Sen. Terry Van Duyn Rep. Rachel Hunt Sen. Mike Woodard Rep. Verla Insko Rep. Gale Adcock Rep. Brandon Lofton Rep. John Ager Rep. Grier Martin Rep. John Autry Rep. Graig R. Meyer Rep. Cynthia Ball Rep. Marcia Morey Rep. Mary Belk Rep. Joe Sam Queen Rep. Scott T. Brewer Rep. Robert T. Reives Rep. Deb Butler Rep. Julie von Haefen From: Adrian Fletcher To: NCDOT Service Account - Rulemaking Subject: [External] OPPOSING BILLBOAD RULE CHANGE Date: Saturday, February 29, 2020 8:01:20 AM CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to [email protected] I oppose the rule change that would override local ordinances and allow billboards with a state permit to be converted to digital and raised to 50 feet in height, even if such changes are not allowed by the applicable city or county ordinance, AND support “Alternative 2” described on page 6 of the NCDOT Fiscal Note to recognize local government ordinances and limit the changes that could be made to an existing billboard as part of modernization. From: Adrian Smith ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message To: Robbins, Jamille A Subject: [External] Please revise proposed digital billboard rule Date: Thursday, February 27, 2020 9:46:03 PM CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Dear NCDOT Environmental Analysis Unit, I oppose the 19A NCAC 02E .0225 rule change that would override local ordinances and allow billboards with a state permit to be converted to digital and raised to 50 feet in height, even if such changes are not allowed by the applicable city or county ordinance. I support the considered, but not chosen, ?Alternative 2? described in the agency?s fiscal note. Alternative 2 would recognize local government ordinances and limit the changes that could be made to an existing billboard as part of modernization. I dislike that the proposed rules would restrict the ability of local communities to control billboards and open the door to taller, digitized billboards. Sincerely, Adrian Smith PO Box 265 Moncure, NC 27559 [email protected] (919) 542-3807 This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club. If you need more information, please contact Lillian Miller at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977- 5500. From: Agnes Crews To: NCDOT Service Account - Rulemaking Subject: [External] Opposed to Digitized 50 ft high billboards Date: Friday, February 28, 2020 11:53:59 AM CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> You must not allow state permits to override local and city ordinances that limit digitized billboards and their heights. Thank you, Aggie Crews Chapel Hill, NC From: A M To: NCDOT Service Account - Rulemaking Subject: [External] Comments on NCDOT Rule Change for Billboards Date: Friday, February 28, 2020 11:26:00 AM CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to [email protected] To Whom it May Concern: Please accept my comment son the following changes to NCGS 136-131.2 Ioppose the rule change that would override local ordinances and allow billboards with a state permit to be converted to digital and raised to 50 feet in height, even if such changes are not allowed by the applicable city or county ordinance. I support “Alternative 2” described on page 6 of the NCDOT Fiscal Note to recognize local government ordinances and limit the changes that could be made to an existing billboard as part of modernization. Respectfully, Alejandro M From: Allison Chrestensen To: NCDOT Service Account - Rulemaking Subject: [External] Billboard rule change Date: Friday, February 28, 2020 1:36:27 PM CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to [email protected] Hello, I am writing to oppose the rule change that would override local ordinances and allow billboards with a state permit to be converted to digital and raised to 50 feet in height. Digital billboards pose a significant roadway hazard by diverting drivers' attention away from the roadway. Given the hazards we already face due to distraction from smart phones, digital car interfaces, and other sources, we simply cannot afford to contribute further to the danger. In addition, taller and more brightly lit billboards contribute to light pollution and detract from the natural landscape, which makes our NC roadways attractive to tourists and pleasant to drive. I support “Alternative 2” described on page 6 of the NCDOT Fiscal Note, which recognizes local government ordinances and limits the changes that could be made to an existing billboard as part of modernization. Thank you for your consideration, Allison Chrestensen Durham, NC From: Robbins, Jamille A To: Jernigan, Hannah Cc: Landi, Helen E; Putnam, Lauren N Subject: FW: [External] Please revise proposed digital billboard rule Date: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 8:10:50 AM -----Original Message----- From: Alison Woomert ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 8:06 AM To: Robbins, Jamille A <[email protected]> Subject: [External] Please revise proposed digital billboard rule CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Dear NCDOT Environmental Analysis Unit, NC is beautiful and it?s good for our souls to be able to see our state?s natural beauty without interruption of digitized billboards. I oppose the 19A NCAC 02E .0225 rule change that would override local ordinances and allow billboards with a state permit to be converted to digital and raised to 50 feet in height, even if such changes are not allowed by the applicable city or county ordinance. I support the considered, but not chosen, ?Alternative 2? described in the agency?s fiscal note. Alternative 2 would recognize local government ordinances and limit the changes that could be made to an existing billboard as part of modernization. I dislike that the proposed rules would restrict the ability of local communities to control billboards and open the door to taller, digitized billboards. Sincerely, Alison Woomert 2604 Jefferson Choice Chapel Hill, NC 27516 [email protected] (919) 967-6513 This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with N.C. Sierra Club. If you need more information, please contact Margaret Lillard at N.C. Sierra Club at [email protected] or (919) 833-8467. ________________________________ Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Andrea Snyder ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message To: Robbins, Jamille A Subject: [External] Please revise proposed digital billboard rule Date: Thursday, February 27, 2020 12:29:39 PM CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Dear NCDOT Environmental Analysis Unit, I oppose the 19A NCAC 02E .0225 rule change that would override local ordinances and allow billboards with a state permit to be converted to digital and raised to 50 feet in height, even if such changes are not allowed by the applicable city or county ordinance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • House/Senate District Number Name House 10 John Bell House 17 Frank Iler House 18 Deb Butler House 19 Ted Davis, Jr
    House/Senate District Number Name House 10 John Bell House 17 Frank Iler House 18 Deb Butler House 19 Ted Davis, Jr. House 20 Holly Grange House 23 Shelly Willingham House 24 Jean Farmer Butterfield House 26 Donna McDowell White House 27 Michael H. Wray House 28 Larry C. Strickland House 31 Zack Hawkins House 32 Terry Garrison House 33 Rosa U. Gill House 34 Grier Martin House 35 Chris Malone House 36 Nelson Dollar House 37 John B. Adcock House 38 Yvonne Lewis Holley House 39 Darren Jackson House 41 Gale Adcock House 42 Marvin W. Lucas House 43 Elmer Floyd House 44 Billy Richardson House 45 John Szoka House 49 Cynthia Ball House 50 Graig R. Meyer House 51 John Sauls House 52 Jamie Boles House 53 David Lewis House 54 Robert T. Reives, II House 55 Mark Brody House 57 Ashton Clemmons House 58 Amos Quick House 59 Jon Hardister House 60 Cecil Brockman House 62 John Faircloth House 66 Ken Goodman House 68 Craig Horn House 69 Dean Arp House 70 Pat B. Hurley House 72 Derwin Montgomery House 74 Debra Conrad House 75 Donny C. Lambeth House 77 Julia Craven Howard House 82 Linda P. Johnson House 85 Josh Dobson House 86 Hugh Blackwell House 87 Destin Hall House 89 Mitchell Smith Setzer House 90 Sarah Stevens House 91 Kyle Hall House 92 Chaz Beasley House 95 John A. Fraley House 96 Jay Adams House 97 Jason R. Saine House 98 John R. Bradford III House 102 Becky Carney House 103 Bill Brawley House 104 Andy Dulin House 105 Scott Stone House 106 Carla Cunningham House 107 Kelly Alexander House 108 John A.
    [Show full text]
  • PSFNC Education Policy Position Questionnaire 2018 Candidate Responses
    PSFNC Education Policy Position Questionnaire 2018 Candidate Responses These candidates are asking for YOUR support and YOUR vote. Before you give them power to represent you, you should ask them for answers to these questions on education policy. And you should also consider whether they have actually demonstrated their stated convictions in any prior service. It's your support, and your vote, for our communities' children and future, and you have a right - and even a responsibility - to ask for real answers! NC State Senate Candidates District Number Candidate Name Link to Completed Questionnaire 1 Richard Steven James NOT YET PROVIDED - IF THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT, PLEASE ASK FOR ANSWERS! 1 D. Cole Phelps NOT YET PROVIDED - IF THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT, PLEASE ASK FOR ANSWERS! 1 Bob Steinburg NOT YET PROVIDED - IF THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT, PLEASE ASK FOR ANSWERS! 1 Clark Twiddy NOT YET PROVIDED - IF THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT, PLEASE ASK FOR ANSWERS! 2 Ginger Garner NOT YET PROVIDED - IF THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT, PLEASE ASK FOR ANSWERS! Tim Harris NOT YET PROVIDED - IF THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT, PLEASE ASK FOR ANSWERS! 2 Lisa Oakley NOT YET PROVIDED - IF THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT, PLEASE ASK FOR ANSWERS! 2 Norman Sanderson NOT YET PROVIDED - IF THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT, PLEASE ASK FOR ANSWERS! 2 Dorothea White NOT YET PROVIDED - IF THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT, PLEASE ASK FOR ANSWERS! 3 Chuck Earley Jr. NOT YET PROVIDED - IF THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT, PLEASE ASK FOR ANSWERS! 3 Erica Smith-Ingram NOT YET PROVIDED - IF THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT, PLEASE ASK FOR ANSWERS! 4 Milton Fitch Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • NC House/Senate Candidates to Watch in 2020
    NC House/Senate Candidates to Watch in 2020 Old North State NCFREE District Member Counties Party RealFactsNC Swing Left Politics (competitive) (competitive) HOUSE Bertie, Camden, Chowan, Perquimans, Tyrrell, 1 Rep. Edward (Eddy) Goodwin R X X X (Lean R) Washington Bertie, Camden, Chowan, Perquimans, Tyrrell, 1 Emily Bunch Nicholson D Washington 2 Rep. Larry Yarborough Granville, Person R X 2 Cindy Deporter Granville, Person D 9 Rep. Perrin Jones Pitt R X X X (Lean D) 9 Brian Farkas Pitt D 12 Rep. Chris Humphrey Lenoir, Pitt R X X X (Lean R) 12 Virginia Cox-Daugherty Lenoir, Pitt D 19 Charlie Miller Brunswick, New Hanover R 19 Marcia Morgan Brunswick, New Hanover D Rep. Holly Grange seat 20 Rep. Ted Davis, Jr. New Hanover R X X 20 Adam Ericson New Hanover D 21 Rep. Raymond Smith Sampson, Wayne D X 21 Brent Heath Sampson, Wayne R 24 Rep. Jean Farmer-Butterfield Wilson D X X 24 Mick Rankin Wilson R 25 Rep. James D. Gailliard Nash D X (Lean D) 25 John Check Nash R 25 Nick Taylor Nash L NC School Boards Association 1 NC House/Senate Candidates to Watch in 2020 Old North State NCFREE District Member Counties Party RealFactsNC Swing Left Politics (competitive) (competitive) 35 Rep. Terence Everitt Wake D X X X (Lean D) 35 Fred Von Canon Wake R 35 Michael Nelson Wake L 36 Rep. Julie von Haefen Wake D X X X (Lean D) 36 Kim Coley Wake R 36 Bruce Basson Wake L 37 Rep. Sydney Batch Wake D X X X X (Lean R) 37 Erin Pare Wake R 37 Liam Leaver Wake L 40 Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Congratulations on Your Win As Speaker of the House. As You
    Speaker Pelosi and the 116th Congress: Congratulations on your win as Speaker of the House. As you prepare to establish your priorities for the new Congress and Democratic House majority, we would like to thank you for your leadership on the fight to address climate change and ask for your continued support in the first 100 days of the 116th Congress. Businesses, communities, and American families who have been leading the way are looking forward to having a partner in the federal government as we address the shared U.S. and global challenge of climate change. Reports released last year, including the Trump administration's own 4th National Climate Assessment (NCA) and the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, show that climate change is already having a drastic impact on our health and our economy. These reports only further underscore the need to take action now. Since President Trump announced his intention to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement nearly two years ago, we, the undersigned governors, mayors, county executives, tribal leaders, businesses, faith groups, investors, hospitals and healthcare systems, and nonprofit organizations have joined forces to tell the world that we are still committed to meeting America's pledge on climate. In the absence of federal leadership, 3,600 leaders from states, cities, businesses, faith communities, and healthcare, representing more than half of the U.S. economy and population, are working locally to adopt and meet targets for reducing the pollution driving climate change - cutting 500 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year by 2025 if targets are fully implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report to Highlight the Issues (I.E
    ONE STEP FORWARD, TWO STEPS BACK FOR CLEAN ENERGY? Representatives Dean Arp, John Szoka, and Sam Watford introduced House Bill 589, “Competitive Energy Solutions for North Carolina” during the 2017 session. This bill took small steps towards increasing the role solar plays in the state’s energy mix by creating a competitive bidding process and by expanding rooftop solar. Senator Harry Brown added a moratorium on wind energy projects, claiming NC’s military operations would be under threat by wind turbines. Senator Brown used the once bipartisan supported clean energy bill as an attempt to pit solar against wind. Governor Cooper refused to allow Brown to claim victory: after signing H589 into law, Cooper immediately issued an executive order to the Dept. of Environmental Quality asking for the expedition of wind project permits. No 18-month ban will stop this clean energy source from moving forward. WATER, AIR, AND HEALTH Legislators continued to put the water, air, and health of North Carolinians at risk throughout the 2017 legislative long session. State lawmakers approved a bill that would allow companies to spray “garbage juice” into our air; passed a policy that limits the amount of financial compensation a resident or property owner can receive for detrimental health and livelihood impacts in hog pollution or other nuisance cases; and thumbed their noses at local control over environmental safeguards by prohibiting state regulators from making stricter water quality rules than the federal standards (assuming those even exist). Overall, leaders of the General Assembly showed a lack of empathy for their constituents and clear preference for polluters with deep pockets in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • 1- House Principal Clerk's Office (919) 733-7760 2021 N.C
    North Carolina General Assembly HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK'S (919) 733-7760 OFFICE 2021 N.C. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REPRESENTATION BY COUNTY COUNTY DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVES Alamance 63 Ricky Hurtado 64 Dennis Riddell Alexander 94 Jeffrey Elmore Alleghany 90 Sarah Stevens Anson 55 Mark Brody Ashe 93 Ray Pickett Avery 85 Dudley Greene Beaufort 79 Keith Kidwell Bertie 1 Edward C. Goodwin Bladen 22 William D. Brisson Brunswick 17 Frank Iler 19 Charles W. Miller Buncombe 114 Susan C. Fisher 115 John Ager 116 Brian Turner Burke 86 Hugh Blackwell 112 David Rogers Cabarrus 67 Wayne Sasser 82 Kristin Baker, M.D. 83 Larry G. Pittman Caldwell 87 Destin Hall Camden 1 Edward C. Goodwin Carteret 13 Pat McElraft Caswell 50 Graig R. Meyer Catawba 89 Mitchell S. Setzer 96 Jay Adams -1- Chatham 54 Robert T. Reives, II Cherokee 120 Karl E. Gillespie Chowan 1 Edward C. Goodwin Clay 120 Karl E. Gillespie Cleveland 110 Kelly E. Hastings 111 Tim Moore Columbus 16 Carson Smith 46 Brenden H. Jones Craven 3 Steve Tyson 79 Keith Kidwell Cumberland 42 Marvin W. Lucas 43 Diane Wheatley 44 William O. Richardson 45 John Szoka Currituck 6 Bobby Hanig Dare 6 Bobby Hanig Davidson 80 Sam Watford 81 Larry W. Potts Davie 77 Julia C. Howard Duplin 4 Jimmy Dixon Durham 29 Vernetta Alston 30 Marcia Morey 31 Zack Hawkins 54 Robert T. Reives, II Edgecombe 23 Shelly Willingham Forsyth 71 Evelyn Terry 72 Amber M. Baker 73 Lee Zachary 74 Jeff Zenger 75 Donny Lambeth Franklin 7 Matthew Winslow Gaston 108 John A. Torbett 109 Dana Bumgardner 110 Kelly E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch 5 NC Legislature.Indd
    The State Legislature The General Assembly is the oldest governmental body in North Carolina. According to tradition, a “legislative assembly of free holders” met for the first time around 1666. No documentary proof, however, exists proving that this assembly actually met. Provisions for a representative assembly in Proprietary North Carolina can be traced to the Concessions and Agreements, adopted in 1665, which called for an unicameral body composed of the governor, his council and twelve delegates selected annually to sit as a legislature. This system of representation prevailed until 1670, when Albemarle County was divided into three precincts. Berkeley Precinct, Carteret Precinct and Shaftsbury Precinct were apparently each allowed five representatives. Around 1682, four new precincts were created from the original three as the colony’s population grew and the frontier moved westward. The new precincts were usually allotted two representatives, although some were granted more. Beginning with the Assembly of 1723, several of the larger, more important towns were allowed to elect their own representatives. Edenton was the first town granted this privilege, followed by Bath, New Bern, Wilmington, Brunswick, Halifax, Campbellton (Fayetteville), Salisbury, Hillsborough and Tarborough. Around 1735 Albemarle and Bath Counties were dissolved and the precincts became counties. The unicameral legislature continued until around 1697, when a bicameral form was adopted. The governor or chief executive at the time, and his council constituted the upper house. The lower house, the House of Burgesses, was composed of representatives elected from the colony’s various precincts. The lower house could adopt its own rules of procedure and elect its own speaker and other officers.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 2 ARGUMENT .............................................................................................................................. 5 I. Legislative Defendants Must Provide the Information Requested in the Second Set of Interrogatories ............................................................................................................. 5 II. In the Alternative, or if Legislative Defendants Do Not Provide The Home Addresses By March 1, the Court Should Bar Legislative Defendants From Defending the 2017 Plans on the Basis of Any Incumbency Theory................................. 7 III. The Court Should Award Fees and Expenses and Other Appropriate Relief ..................... 8 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................... 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE .................................................................................................. 11 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Cloer v. Smith , 132 N.C. App. 569, 512 S.E.2d 779 (1999)............................................................................ 7 F. E. Davis
    [Show full text]
  • Letter of Support from 39 NC Representatives
    NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STATE LEGISLATIVE BUILDING RALEIGH 27601-1096 May 20, 2021 The Honorable Governor Roy Cooper North Carolina Office of the Governor 20301 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-0301 Re: Support for Adoption of Rules to Reduce Carbon Pollution from the Energy Sector and to Join Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative Dear Governor Cooper, We commend you for your leadership in confronting the threats that climate change poses to our State. By bringing North Carolina into the U.S. Climate Alliance and issuing Executive Order No. 80 (EO80), your administration has established science-based carbon pollution reduction and clean energy goals which are critical to ensuring that we in North Carolina do our part to help avert the worst impacts of climate change. We endorse the goals of the North Carolina Clean Energy Plan (CEP) to achieve a 70% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from 2005 levels by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. Recommendation A-1 of the CEP resulted in a stakeholder process that identified options to achieve these carbon reduction goals. Of the options examined, joining the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) was identified as one of the most cost-effective pathways for North Carolina to swiftly and meaningfully reduce power sector carbon pollution. We write to urge your administration to continue the common-sense approach to reducing greenhouse gas pollution that you launched with Executive Order 80 by establishing enforceable limits on power sector carbon pollution and joining the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). Achieving the Clean Energy Plan’s 2030 target requires swift action.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Officials Directory March 30, 2017
    Public Officials Directory March 30, 2017 1st EDITION Cape Fear Council of Governments 1480 Harbour Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28401-7776 910-395-4553 • 1-800-218-6575 Fax 910-395-2684 www.capefearcog.org Published by Cape Fear Council of Governments Cover art by C. Keith Whitelock Region O Public Officials Directory March 30, 2017 Volume XVII 1st Edition i Table of Contents D = Democrat R = Republican I = Independent U = Unaffiliated Page # Program Information ……….……...……………………………………..……………………… 1-2 What is a COG/LRO & the duties of a Cape Fear COG Liaison? …………………...….….. 3 Cape Fear Council of Governments Organizational Structure with contact information .... 4 Region O Map with chart ……………………………………………………………………….. 5 Cape Fear Council of Governments Executive Committee Members ……………………… 6 Member Liaisons & Local Governments …………………………..………………………….. 7 Brunswick County …………………………….……………………………...………………… 9-10 Columbus County ………………………………………………………………………………. 11-12 New Hanover County …………………………...……………………………………………… 13-14 Pender County ……………...……………………………………………………...…………… 15-16 Town of Atkinson ………………………………………………………………………...………. 17 Village of Bald Head Island ……………………………………………………………...……… 18 Town of Belville ………………………………………………………………………...………… 19 Town of Boardman ………………………………………………………………...…………….. 20 City of Boiling Spring Lakes ……………………………………………………..……………… 21 Town of Bolivia ……………………………………………………………………...……………. 22 Town of Bolton ……………………………………………………………………………..…….. 23 Town of Brunswick ………………………………………………………………………..……... 24 Town of Burgaw
    [Show full text]
  • NAACP Voter Guide: Who’S with You?
    NAACP Voter Guide: Who’s With You? ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES The Republican legislators who now control the NC General Assembly got elected in 2010 when most voters stayed home. They redrew their districts to make it easier to get re-elected in 2012. Then they passed dozens of laws that hurt North Carolina: they gave tax breaks to the rich but big cuts to public education, health care, unemployment assistance, and more. They also want to make it harder for you to vote. It all began in 2010 when they won with support from just 1 out of 4 eligible voters, because most voters didn’t show up. DON’T SIT OUT 2014! Tell others: Vote! Elections Matter! Photo by Phil Fonville U.S. SENATE CONTEST U.S. HOUSE CONTESTS The winner of the U.S. Senate contest in NC could SEE THE MAP BELOW FOR YOUR CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT determine which political party controls the Senate. Vote in your district’s contest. See more districts on the next page The Senate can block the President’s appointments Republican candidates appear first in each partisan race on the ballot. for the U.S. Supreme Court and other courts; it also Current Members are in color: Republicans and Democrats. adopts laws and the U.S. budget affecting everyone. District 1 (choose one) District 2 (choose one) ARTHUR RICH (R) G.K. BUTTERFIELD (D) RENEE ELLMERS (R) CLAY AIKENS (D) Republican THOM TILLIS Democrat KAY HAGAN “Take steps to increase Strong supporter of “Limit the growth of the “Fight for North Caro- respect for educators” Affordable Care Act federal government.” linians, not a party.” NC House Speaker Thom Tillis is running against U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate List Grouped by Contest Alamance Board of Elections Alamance
    ALAMANCE BOARD OF ELECTIONS CANDIDATE LIST GROUPED BY CONTEST CRITERIA: Election: 11/03/2020, Show Contest w/o Candidate: Y, County: ALL COUNTIES, Data Source: FULL COUNTY VIEW CANDIDATE NAME NAME ON BALLOT PARTY FILING DATE ADDRESS ALAMANCE US PRESIDENT TRUMP, DONALD J Donald J. Trump REP 08/14/2020 BIDEN, JOSEPH R Joseph R. Biden DEM 08/14/2020 BLANKENSHIP, DON Don Blankenship CST 08/14/2020 HAWKINS, HOWIE Howie Hawkins GRE 08/14/2020 JORGENSEN, JO Jo Jorgensen LIB 08/14/2020 US SENATE TILLIS, THOMAS ROLAND Thom Tillis REP 12/09/2019 P. O. BOX 97396 RALEIGH, NC 27624 BRAY, SHANNON WILSON Shannon W. Bray LIB 12/11/2019 215 MYSTIC PINE PL APEX, NC 27539 CUNNINGHAM, JAMES CALVIN III Cal Cunningham DEM 12/03/2019 PO BOX 309 RALEIGH, NC 27602 HAYES, KEVIN EUGENE Kevin E. Hayes CST 12/19/2019 416 S WEST CENTER ST FAISON, NC 28341 US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DISTRICT 13 BUDD, THEODORE PAUL Ted Budd REP 12/03/2019 PO BOX 97127 RALEIGH, NC 27624 HUFFMAN, JEFFREY SCOTT Scott Huffman DEM 12/20/2019 4311 SCHOOL HOUSE COMMONS HARRISBURG, NC 28075 NC GOVERNOR PISANO, ALBERT LAWRENCE Al Pisano CST 12/19/2019 7209 E.W.T. HARRIS BLVD. STE. J 119 CHARLOTTE, NC 28227 COOPER, ROY ASBERRY III Roy Cooper DEM 12/05/2019 434 FAYETTEVILLE ST RALEIGH, NC 27601 STE 2020 DIFIORE, STEVEN JOSEPH II Steven J. DiFiore LIB 12/20/2019 6817 FISHERS FARM LN UNIT C1 CHARLOTTE, NC 28277 FOREST, DANIEL JAMES Dan Forest REP 12/04/2019 PO BOX 471845 CHARLOTTE, NC 28247 CONT_CAND_rpt_3.rpt Page 1 of 545 Sep 02, 2020 3:52 pm ALAMANCE BOARD OF ELECTIONS CANDIDATE LIST GROUPED BY CONTEST CANDIDATE NAME NAME ON BALLOT PARTY FILING DATE ADDRESS ALAMANCE NC LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR ROBINSON, MARK KEITH Mark Robinson REP 12/02/2019 P.O.
    [Show full text]