DOCSLIB.ORG

W Orld Refugee Day, 20 June a PLACE to CALL HOME Rebuilding Lives in Safety and Dignity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
W Orld Refugee Day, 20 June a PLACE to CALL HOME Rebuilding Lives in Safety and Dignity kit-toprint 4/05/04 10:00 Page 1 ©UNHCR /N. Behring-Chisholm a place to call home Rebuilding lives in safety and dignity ©UNHCR/P.Benatar, 2002 ©UNHCR/L.Gubb, 1982 ©UNHCR/L.Astrom, 1985 W orld Refugee Day, 20 June A PLACE TO CALL HOME Rebuilding Lives in Safety and Dignity Over the long course of human to find "durable solutions". It is this These are just some of the basic conflict, refugees are a relatively last mission that provides the rights and services to which all modern phenomenon. It is really theme for this year’s World people, including refugees, are only in the last 100 years, when Refugee Day: "A place to call entitled, and which of course do the nature of warfare changed home – rebuilding lives in safety not come free. The costs mount from armies fighting each other and dignity" even higher when you add in literally on fields of battle, to items such as the supply of whole populations being devas- To come even close to our long- construction and agricultural tated by aerial bombing, artillery term goal requires an enormous "starter kits", home and small- and gas attacks, that the world effort, serious commitment, and business loan guarantees, and has witnessed masses of civilians inevitably, a lot of money. direct financial assistance to host fleeing their homes to seek refuge "Durable solutions" are not just counties to help them cover the elsewhere. about physically transporting cost of absorbing refugee refugees back to their home populations. Multiply these by In the 55 years since receiving its towns and villages, or persuading the 20-plus million uprooted charter, UNHCR has already helped other countries to accept them. people whom we are trying to a staggering 50 million people, Because according to our UN help find durable solutions, and uprooted by conflict and forced to mandate, no refugee under our the enormity of the commitment leave their homes, to restart their care may be forced to relocate or that is needed can seem over- lives. This horrific total does not even return against his or her will, or to whelming. Simply put, UNHCR include the millions displaced by the conditions which are unsafe or needs all the financial and two World Wars. unsuitable. Therefore we have to material help it can get. work in a variety of ways to Some 20 million uprooted people create conditions that are In this information kit you will are still under UNHCR’s protection favourable to return, resettle- find a number of stories of today, and if you asked any one of ment or integration into other individual refugees who have them to name what they want societies. To do that a hundred successfully returned to their most of all, the answer would be and one things, which we more original homes, or integrated into almost sure to include the word fortunate people often take for the societies of the countries in "home" – to return home or to find a granted, first have to be put in which they sought refuge, or new one. Either way, "home", with place. To name just a few, there who have resettled in asylum all its implied associations of safety, needs to be: countries. Other articles provide warmth, neighbourliness, self- ● reasonable political stability; examples of how UNHCR has sufficiency and permanence, is ● a functioning social, legal and tackled the refugee crises their goal. It is ours too, and when physical infrastructure; created by various conflicts the last person under our care has ● guarantees of safety and non- around the worlds in the recent found a place to call home, we’ll discrimination; past. And there are also a dozen willingly take down the UNHCR ● freedom from persecution -- background articles on UNHCR, sign, turn out the lights, and lock having to flee again for the its mandates, its initiatives and the door. same reasons; agendas, its mission, its statis- ● adequate food, water, sani- tics, and a glossary. All may be Of course we know that happy tation and medical services; quoted or reproduced freely, and day, if it ever arrives, will be a long guarantees of legal status and further information can be time coming. So in the meantime ● provision of proper docu- obtained by contacting local we stay very much in business, mentation; UNHCR offices or visiting continuing to pursue our three ● freedom of movement; www.unhcr.org. main missions: providing imme- ● removal of mines and un- diate relief in crisis situations; exploded ordnance; seeking ways to resolve differ- ● opportunities for work and ences before they affect civilian potential for self sufficiency; populations; and helping refugees ● language and skills education. AGENDA FOR PROTECTION New impetus to the search for asylum-seekers and refugees, and Around 20 million refugees under durable solutions make it easier to implement the UNHCR care around the world are 1951 Convention and its 1967 desperately in need of timely and The year 2001 was the 50th Protocol. durable solutions; these depend anniversary of the founding largely on resolute and sustained instrument of international refugee The Agenda for Protection sets six international cooperation to resolve protection – the UN Convention important overall goals: refugee situations, some of which relating to the Status of Refugees. 1 Strengthen implementation of the have been allowed to drag on for Convention and its Protocol decades, and on support for the Rather than seeing it as cause for 2 Protect refugees within broader three durable solutions: voluntary celebration, some States had begun migration movements repatriation; local integration; and to criticize the 1951 Convention and 3 Improve the sharing of the resettlement. its Protocol of 1967 for not being responsibilities and burdens of adapted to a number of vexing protecting refugees among states Of the three solutions, it is generally challenges which had emerged over 4 Address security-related concerns recognized that voluntary repatriation the years, such as misuse of asylum more effectively in conditions of safety and dignity systems, the problems of "mixed" 5 Redouble the search for remains the preferred solution for movements of migrants and durable solutions for refugees refugees. Local integration is also refugees, the growth of human 6 Meet the protection needs of instrumental in resolving the plight of smuggling and trafficking, and a mix refugee women and children many refugees or groups of of "asylum fatigue" on the part of refugees; and resettlement is a some states hosting refugees and While all six goals are important to durable solution and a vital tool for "donor fatigue" on the part of others. the protection of refugees, the protection, while also serving as an search for durable solutions is of instrument of international solidarity Confident that a wide-ranging and particular concern, which is why it is and burden-sharing. participatory dialogue with all parties under the spotlight in this 2004 would clarify the issues and point the World Refugee Day. way forward, in December 2000 UNHCR set in motion the Global Consultations on International Protection. The aim was to revitalize the 1951 Convention framework, while better equipping countries to address the challenges in a spirit of dialogue and cooperation. As part of the Global Consultations process, UNHCR organized the first ministerial-level gathering of countries party to the Convention and/or its Protocol in five decades. The 2001 Declaration of States Parties adopted there reaffirmed the Convention’s central role in assuring the protection of refugees and its enduring importance as the primary refugee protection treaty. The Agenda for Protection is the program of action resulting from the the Global Consultations. It reflects a wide cross section of concerns and contains the concrete recommend- ations of states, intergovernmental ©UNHCR/H.Kralj/12.1995 organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), as well as Bosnian refugees in Croatia refugees themselves on activities to strengthen international protection of Redoubling the search for durable solutions: 8 key objectives 1. Realization of comprehensive durable solutions strategies, become naturalized citizens of the country of asylum, for refugees especially for protracted refugee situations who have already attained a considerable degree of socio- ● Review of all protracted refugee situations to explore the feasibility economic integration. of comprehensive plans of action (CPAs), considering each of the ● Contribute to local integration through burden-sharing to ensure three available durable solutions, to be implemented together with that the necessary resources are available to underpin self-reliance countries of origin, host countries, resettlement countries and and local integration. refugees themselves. 5. Expand resettlement opportunities 2. Improved conditions for voluntary repatriation ● Expand the number of countries offering resettlement. ● Countries of origin to commit themselves to respecting the right to ● Encourage states that do not yet offer resettlement opportunities return and to receiving back their refugees within an acceptable actively to consider making some resettlement places available. framework of physical, legal and material safety. ● Develop capacity-building programmes with new resettlement ● Countries of origin to foster reconciliation and dialogue, particularly countries. with refugee communities, and to ensure respect for the rule of law. ● States that offer resettlement opportunities to consider increasing ● States to provide support to countries of origin, to assist them in their resettlement quotas, diversifying their intake of refugee meeting their7responsibility to ensure the legal, physical and groups, and introducing more flexible resettlement criteria. material security of refugees. ● Ensure that resettlement runs in tandem with a more vigorous ● Facilitate the participation of refugees, including women, in peace integration policy, aimed at enabling refugees having durable and reconciliation processes to ensure the right to return, and to to residence status to enjoy equality of rights and opportunities in the encourage repatriation, reintegration and reconciliation. social, economic and cultural life of the country.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unitednations Nationsunies
    United Nations Nations Unies T HE PRESIDENT OF THE GEN ERAL ASSEMBLY LE PRESIDENT DE L’AS SEMBLEE GENERALE 20 June 2003 Statement of H.E. Mr. Jan Kavan, President of the 57th Session of the General Assembly, on World Refugee Day There are more than 40 million displaced people worldwide - about half of them children. Uprooted from their homes and either “internally displaced” within their own countries or forced to flee as refugees to other states, these people are caught in the difficult limbo between a turbulent past and an uncertain future. On this third World Refugee Day, we salute the world’s displaced people. We salute them for the courage and strength they demonstrate as they strive toward better lives. And, since this year’s celebration is dedicated to refugee youth, we salute young refugees for the vital role they play in preserving the nuclear family, in contributing to refugee camp life, and in building their local communities, whether they return home or begin a new life in a new country. On this day we look back on a year that saw positive developments in the lives of many refugees. After decades of civil war, two million refugees returned to Afghanistan and a quarter million to their homes in Sri Lanka. In Angola, too, the trickle of returnees has begun. But in other parts of the world, the situation for refugees worsened. It was particularly dire in West Africa, where wars in Liberia, Cote d'Ivoire and Sierra Leone sent tens of thousands of refugees shuttling from one conflict zone to another.
    [Show full text]
  • 41B0c1b14.Pdf
    E U R O P E ALBANIA From 27 May to 22 June, UNHCR organised an exhibition of paintings titled "Colours of Albania in the World" at the Albanian Gallery of Arts. The exhibition brought home 23 Albanian artists living and working abroad. Some are refugees from the previous regime, others are migrants, but all have been living abroad for many years. The artwork reflects their nostalgia for their home country, and artists Ibrahim Kodra and Omer Kaleshi have been called symbols of Albanian culture. The exhibition focused on respect for migrants and refugees, as well as on the positive contributions they can make to host societies. About 600 persons attended the launching ceremony. Media coverage was excellent, including 30 articles and 18 TV and radio mentions during the month of the exhibition. About USD 20,000 were raised through local fundraising efforts to cover the expenses of the event. The exhibition was organised in partnership with the International Organization for Migration and the National Gallery of Arts, under the auspices of the Albanian Prime Minister. ARMENIA UNHCR participated in the morning TV programme on Armenian national TV. During the programme, a UNHCR official answered questions related to housing projects and the local integration of refugees. In addition, some Armenian TV stations broadcast the World Refugee Day TV spot for 15 days. An exhibition-sale of refugees' art work was also organised to show that the most appropriate durable solution for ethnic Armenian refugees from Azerbaijan is local integration in Armenia. The exhibition was appreciated; some of the refugees were asked to make some crafts for souvenir shops.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:10-Cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 40
    Case 1:10-cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GENOCIDE VICTIMS ) OF KRAJINA, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 1:10-CV- _____ ) L-3 COMMUNICATIONS ) Corp. and ) MPRI, Inc., ) JURY DEMAND ) Class Action ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Genocide Victims of Krajina, including Milena Jovic and Zivka Mijic, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, for their Complaint against Defendants L-3 Communications Corp. (“L-3”) and MPRI, Inc. (“MPRI”), allege the following: Nature of the Action 1. This is a class action brought by ethnic Serbs who resided in the Krajina region of Croatia up to August 1995 and who then became victims of the Croatian military assault known as Operation Storm—an aggressive, systematic military attack and bombardment on a demilitarized civilian population that had been placed under the protection of the United Nations. Operation Storm was designed to kill or forcibly expel the ethnic Serbian residents of the Krajina region -1- Case 1:10-cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 2 of 40 from Croatian territory, just because they were a minority religio-ethnic group. Defendant MPRI, a private military contractor subsequently acquired by Defendant L-3 Communications Inc., trained and equipped the Croatian military for Operation Storm and designed the Operation Storm battle plan. Operation Storm became the largest land offensive in Europe since World War II and resulted in the murder and inhumane treatment of thousands of ethnic Serbs, the forced displacement of approximately 200,000 ethnic Serbs from their ancestral homes in Croatian territory, and the pillaging and destruction of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Serbian-owned property.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia to War, to Dayton, and to Its Slow Peace – European Council On
    REPORT BOSNIA TO WAR, TO DAYTON, AND TO ITS SLOW PEACE Carl Bildt January 2021 SUMMARY The international community was gravely unprepared for the conflicts that followed the dissolution of Yugoslavia. In particular, it neglected the challenge of Bosnia. Europe alone was not enough to bring peace, and the United States went from disinterested to disruptive and finally to decisive for a credible peace process. Russia in those days was a constructive actor. The war in Bosnia lasted years longer than it should have more because of the divisions between outside powers than because of the divisions within the country and the region itself. The fundamentals of the Dayton Agreement in 1995 were not too dissimilar from what had been discussed, but not pursued, prior to the outbreak of the war. It is a solution that is closer to the reality of Belgium than to the reality of Cyprus. After the war, many political leaders in Bosnia saw peace as the continuation of the war by other means, which has seriously hampered economic and social progress. Ultimately, it will be difficult to sustain progress for Bosnia or the region without a credible and clear EU accession process. INTRODUCTION It was a quarter of a century ago that the most painful conflict on European soil since the second world war came to an end. Peace agreements are rare birds. Most conflicts end either with the victory of one of the sides or some sort of ceasefire that is rarely followed by a true peace agreement. The map of Europe shows a number of such ‘frozen conflicts’.
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Croatia's Politics of Memory and Identity
    Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER WORKSHOP: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER Author: Taylor A. McConnell, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh Title: “KRVatska”, “Branitelji”, “Žrtve”: (Re-)framing Croatia’s politics of memory and identity Date: 3 April 2018 Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER “KRVatska”, “Branitelji”, “Žrtve”: (Re-)framing Croatia’s politics of memory and identity Taylor McConnell, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh Web: taylormcconnell.com | Twitter: @TMcConnell_SSPS | E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper explores the development of Croatian memory politics and the construction of a new Croatian identity in the aftermath of the 1990s war for independence. Using the public “face” of memory – monuments, museums and commemorations – I contend that Croatia’s narrative of self and self- sacrifice (hence “KRVatska” – a portmanteau of “blood/krv” and “Croatia/Hrvatska”) is divided between praising “defenders”/“branitelji”, selectively remembering its victims/“žrtve”, and silencing the Serb minority. While this divide is partially dependent on geography and the various ways the Croatian War for Independence came to an end in Dalmatia and Slavonia, the “defender” narrative remains preeminent. As well, I discuss the division of Croatian civil society, particularly between veterans’ associations and regional minority bodies, which continues to disrupt amicable relations among the Yugoslav successor states and places Croatia in a generally undesired but unshakable space between “Europe” and the Balkans. 1 Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Bosnian Train and Equip Program: a Lesson in Interagency Integration of Hard and Soft Power by Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 15 The Bosnian Train and Equip Program: A Lesson in Interagency Integration of Hard and Soft Power by Christopher J. Lamb, with Sarah Arkin and Sally Scudder Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the unified com- batant commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: President Bill Clinton addressing Croat-Muslim Federation Peace Agreement signing ceremony in the Old Executive Office Building, March 18, 1994 (William J. Clinton Presidential Library) The Bosnian Train and Equip Program The Bosnian Train and Equip Program: A Lesson in Interagency Integration of Hard and Soft Power By Christopher J. Lamb with Sarah Arkin and Sally Scudder Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 15 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. March 2014 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Pleading of the Republic of Croatia
    international court of Justice case concerning the application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide (croatia v. serBia) ADDITIONAL PLEADING OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA volume 1 30 august 2012 international court of Justice case concerning the application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide (croatia v. serBia) ADDITIONAL PLEADING OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA volume 1 30 august 2012 ii iii CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 section i: overview and structure 1 section ii: issues of proof and evidence 3 proof of genocide - general 5 ictY agreed statements of fact 6 the ictY Judgment in Gotovina 7 additional evidence 7 hearsay evidence 8 counter-claim annexes 9 the chc report and the veritas report 9 reliance on ngo reports 11 the Brioni transcript and other transcripts submitted by the respondent 13 Witness statements submitted by the respondent 14 missing ‘rsK’ documents 16 croatia’s full cooperation with the ictY-otp 16 the decision not to indict for genocide and the respondent’s attempt to draw an artificial distinction Between the claim and the counter-claim 17 CHAPTER 2: CROATIA AND THE ‘RSK’/SERBIA 1991-1995 19 introduction 19 section i: preliminary issues 20 section ii: factual Background up to operation Flash 22 serb nationalism and hate speech 22 serbian non-compliance with the vance plan 24 iv continuing human rights violations faced by croats in the rebel serb occupied territories 25 failure of the serbs to demilitarize 27 operation maslenica (January 1993)
    [Show full text]
  • Barbara Peranic
    Reuters Fellowship Paper, Oxford University ACCOUNTABILITY AND THE CROATIAN MEDIA IN THE PROCESS OF RECONCILIATION Two Case Studies By Barbara Peranic Michaelmas 2006/Hilary 2007 CONTENTS Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Section 1………………………………………………………………………………………4 Introduction……….…………………………………………………............................4 The Legacy of the Past.………………………………………………………………...5 Section 2………………………………………………………………………..........................7 Regulations & Mechanisms to Prevent Hate Speech ………………………………… 7 Croatian Journalists’ Association……………………………………………………....9 Vecernji list’s Ombudsman and Code of Practice…………………………………...10 Letters to the Editor/Comments………………………………………………………12 Media Watchdogs …………………………………………………….........................12 Section 3………………………………………………………………………........................13 Selected Events and Press Coverage………………………………….........................13 Biljani Donji …………………………………………………….................................13 Donji Lapac …………………………………………………………………………..21 Section 4………………………………………………………………………………………29 The Question of Ethics………………………………………………..........................29 Section 5…………………………………………………………………………....................32 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………….32 2 Acknowledgements I want to express my gratitude to the Reuters Institute for giving me the opportunity to conduct this research. My warm thanks to all of the Reuters Institute team who gave so freely of their time and especially to Paddy Coulter for being an inspiring director and a wonderful host. I owe a huge dept of
    [Show full text]
  • Corrigé Corrected
    Corrigé Corrected CR 2014/16 International Court Cour internationale of Justice de Justice THE HAGUE LA HAYE YEAR 2014 Public sitting held on Wednesday 12 March 2014, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia) ________________ VERBATIM RECORD ________________ ANNÉE 2014 Audience publique tenue le mercredi 12 mars 2014, à 15 heures, au Palais de la Paix, sous la présidence de M. Tomka, président, en l’affaire relative à l’Application de la convention pour la prévention et la répression du crime de génocide (Croatie c. Serbie) ____________________ COMPTE RENDU ____________________ - 2 - Present: President Tomka Vice-President Sepúlveda-Amor Judges Owada Abraham Keith Bennouna Skotnikov Cançado Trindade Yusuf Greenwood Xue Donoghue Gaja Sebutinde Bhandari Judges ad hoc Vukas Kreća Registrar Couvreur - 3 - Présents : M. Tomka, président M. Sepúlveda-Amor, vice-président MM. Owada Abraham Keith Bennouna Skotnikov Cançado Trindade Yusuf Greenwood Mmes Xue Donoghue M. Gaja Mme Sebutinde M. Bhandari, juges MM. Vukas Kreća, juges ad hoc M. Couvreur, greffier - 4 - The Government of the Republic of Croatia is represented by: Ms Vesna Crnić-Grotić, Professor of International Law, University of Rijeka, as Agent; H.E. Ms Andreja Metelko-Zgombić, Ambassador, Director General for EU Law, International Law and Consular Affairs, Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs, Zagreb, Ms Jana Špero, Head of Sector, Ministry of Justice, Zagreb, Mr. Davorin Lapaš, Professor of International Law, University of Zagreb, as Co-Agents; Mr. James Crawford, A.C., S.C., F.B.A., Whewell Professor of International Law, University of Cambridge, Member of the Institut de droit international, Barrister, Matrix Chambers, London, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Never Again: International Intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina1
    Never again: 1 International intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina July 2017 David Harland2 1 This study is one of a series commissioned as part of an ongoing UK Government Stabilisation Unit project relating to elite bargains and political deals. The project is exploring how national and international interventions have and have not been effective in fostering and sustaining political deals and elite bargains; and whether or not these political deals and elite bargains have helped reduce violence, increased local, regional and national stability and contributed to the strengthening of the relevant political settlement. This is a 'working paper' and the views contained within do not necessarily represent those of HMG. 2 Dr David Harland is Executive Director of the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue. He served as a witness for the Prosecution at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in the cases of The Prosecutor versus Slobodan Milošević, The Prosecutor versus Radovan Karadžić, The Prosecutor versus Ratko Mladić, and others. Executive summary The war in Bosnia and Herzegovina was the most violent of the conflicts which accompanied the break- up of Yugoslavia, and this paper explores international engagement with that war, including the process that led to the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement. Sarajevo and Srebrenica remain iconic symbols of international failure to prevent and end violent conflict, even in a small country in Europe. They are seen as monuments to the "humiliation" of Europe and the UN and the
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly 12 February 2001
    United Nations A/RES/55/76 Distr.: General General Assembly 12 February 2001 Fifty-fifth session Agenda item 109 Resolution adopted by the General Assembly [on the report of the Third Committee (A/55/597)] 55/76. Fiftieth anniversary of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and World Refugee Day The General Assembly 1. Commends the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees for its leadership and coordination of international action for refugees, and acknowledges the tireless efforts of the Office of the High Commissioner to provide international protection and assistance to refugees and other persons of concern and to promote durable solutions for their problems during the past fifty years; 2. Pays tribute to the dedication of United Nations humanitarian workers and associated personnel, the staff of the Office of the High Commissioner in the field, including local staff, who risk their lives in the performance of their duties; 3. Reaffirms its support for the activities of the Office of the High Commissioner, in accordance with the relevant General Assembly resolutions, on behalf of returnees, stateless persons and internally displaced persons; 4. Notes the crucial role of partnerships with Governments and international, regional and non-governmental organizations, as well as of the participation of refugees in decisions that affect their lives; 5. Recognizes that, by virtue of its activities on behalf of refugees and other persons of concern, the Office of the High Commissioner also contributes to promoting the purposes and principles of the United Nations, in particular those related to peace, human rights and development; 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 12-E-0283
    STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE Case 12-E-0283 In the Matter of the Review of Long Island Power Authority’s Preparedness and Response to Hurricane Irene June 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 Tropical Storm Irene ............................................................................................................... 3 Overall Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 4 Recommendation Summary .................................................................................................. 6 II. ELECTRIC OPERATION STORM PREPARATION ................................................................ 8 A. Overview of Storm Preparation Activities ................................................................ 8 B. Emergency Response Plans ......................................................................................... 8 C. Emergency Operations Center Preparation ............................................................ 13 D. Crew Resources ........................................................................................................... 14 E. Alert Levels and Damage Prediction ....................................................................... 16 III. STORM RESPONSE .................................................................................................................... 20 A. Overview
    [Show full text]