DOCSLIB.ORG

Dredging the Manasquan River Complex – Creating Capacity, Beneficial Use Through Beach Nourishment, and Enhancing the Greater Good of the Manasquan Inlet Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dredging the Manasquan River Complex – Creating Capacity, Beneficial Use Through Beach Nourishment, and Enhancing the Greater Good of the Manasquan Inlet Area DREDGING SUMMIT & EXPO ’18 PROCEEDINGS DREDGING THE MANASQUAN RIVER COMPLEX – CREATING CAPACITY, BENEFICIAL USE THROUGH BEACH NOURISHMENT, AND ENHANCING THE GREATER GOOD OF THE MANASQUAN INLET AREA W.S. Douglas1 , W. Henderson2, M. Marano3, T.W. Chen4 and S. Flanigan5 ABSTRACT The Manasquan Inlet is one of New Jersey’s busiest recreational and commercial maritime complexes. This busy seaport is facilitated by a Federal channel (2.3 nautical miles (4.26 km)), 13 State channels (5.9 nautical miles (10.93 km)), and numerous local channels. Maintenance of this system is typically performed by hydraulic cutterhead pipeline dredge with placement in one of two confined disposal facilities (CDF’s) or on public beaches (coarse-grained material only). We will discuss the recently completed maintenance dredging of the Manasquan River Complex. This state-sponsored project provided direct relief for over fifty waterside businesses, over 180 private residences, multiple recreational access and bathing areas, and a critical United States Coast Guard (USCG) Search and Rescue Station. As part of the recovery effort following Superstorm Sandy, NJDOT performed a system wide condition survey of State channels. This survey determined that the Manasquan complex would require dredging of approximately 390,000 CY (298,180 CM) of sediment to return it to a state of good repair. Of this, over 41,500 CY (31,700 CM) of material could be directly attributed to the storm. While ample capacity for coarse grained material was available on several public beach areas, the two confined disposal areas did not have available capacity for the 60 percent of the material that was determined to be fine grained. It was determined that only the Gull Island CDF might be modified to accept dredged material. Gull Island CDF is a 9.36 acre (3.79 Ha.) facility on a 22 acre (8.90 Ha.) island, just west of the Inlet. Project timing precluded expanding the facility footprint and the existing berms were very steep and underlain by soft, organic soils, so raising the dike crest elevation was not a viable solution. Construction of a geotextile reinforced stockpile using the existing CDF material was proposed. The stockpile was designed to an elevation nearly fifteen feet (4.5 M) higher than the confining berms to create the needed capacity. A subsurface monitoring program was also proposed to detect any deep-seated movement of the existing berms that could eventually lead to failure. Project improvements include placing sand on one of New Jersey’s most popular bathing beaches consistent with a USACE beach fill program; the addition of Cooks Creek channel, home to the USCG Search and Rescue Station and charter and commercial fishing enterprises; and a mutually beneficial solution for Monmouth County by providing sand for a County beach. 1 Dredging Program Manager, New Jersey Department of Transportation Office of Maritime Resources, 1035 Parkway Avenue, Trenton, New Jersey 08625 USA T: 609-530-4770, Email [email protected]. 2 Resident Engineer, New Jersey Department of Transportation Office of Maritime Resources, 1035 Parkway Avenue, Trenton, New Jersey 08625 USA T: 609-530-4770, Email [email protected]. 3 Engineer of Record, WSP USA, Inc. 2000 Lenox Drive, Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648 USA T: 609-512-3516, Email [email protected]. 4 Geotechnical Engineer, WSP USA, Inc. 2000 Lenox Drive, Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648 USA T: 609-512- 3444, Email [email protected]. 5 Design Engineer, Gahagan & Bryant Associates, 9008 – O Yellow Brick Road, Baltimore, Maryland, 21237-5608 USA T: 410-682-5595, Email [email protected] 422 DREDGING SUMMIT & EXPO ’18 PROCEEDINGS Details of the construction and dredging sequence, monitoring program, and challenges met during the project will be discussed. Keywords: Dredged material management, maintenance dredging, beneficial use, beach replenishment, confined disposal facility INTRODUCTION Figure 1. Project Location Map – Manasquan Inlet – Ocean and Monmouth Counties, New Jersey The Manasquan River forms the border between Ocean and Monmouth Counties on the coast of central New Jersey, emptying into the Atlantic at the Manasquan Inlet; one of several Federally-maintained coastal inlets in the State and the initiation point for the NJ Intracoastal Waterway. Figure 1 shows the general project area located on the central New Jersey coastline. The Manasquan River and Inlet is one of New Jersey’s busiest recreational and commercial maritime complexes, home to 16 marinas, 50 water dependent commercial businesses, a commercial fishing fleet, a US Coast Guard search and rescue station, several heavily used bathing beaches and numerous ocean and riverside residences. Access is facilitated by a Federal channel (2.3 nautical miles 4.26 km)), 13 State channels (5.9 nautical miles (10.93 km)), and numerous local channels, lagoons and berths. Boaters can not only access the ocean via the Inlet, but they can also access Barnegat Bay via the Intracoastal Waterway which continues south through the Manasquan Canal, located approximately 2.7 miles (4.35 km) west of the Inlet. Dredging of one or more portions of the system is required nearly yearly, with material being placed on beaches or in one of two confined disposal facilities (CDFs) located at opposite ends of the 5.6 mile (9.01 km) long system. The larger (and more important) of the two CDFs is on Gull Island, a 22 acre (8.90 Ha.) island located in the middle of the River just inside the Inlet. In addition 423 DREDGING SUMMIT & EXPO ’18 PROCEEDINGS to being home to the 9.36 acre (3.79 Ha.) CDF, it is also a bird refuge, providing critical nesting and foraging habitat for a number of protected species including Osprey, American Oystercatcher and Least Tern. As part of the recovery effort following Superstorm Sandy, NJDOT performed a system-wide condition survey of State channels. This survey determined that the Manasquan complex would require dredging of approximately 390,000 CY (298,180 CM) of sediment to return it to a state of good repair (authorized depth). Of this, over 41,500 CY (31,700 CM) of material could be directly attributed to the storm. While ample capacity for coarse-grained material was available on several public beach areas, neither of the two confined disposal areas had any appreciable capacity remaining. This necessitated a prioritization in order to provide as much navigational relief as possible while minimizing cost and maximizing our use of the available capacity. Since the CDF at the far western end of the complex was the smallest, and held in private ownership, the focus naturally fell to the larger publicly-owned Gull Island CDF. DESIGN PARAMETERS AND PROJECT CONSTRAINTS State Channels Using the prioritization matrix shown as Table 1, below, five channels were initially selected to be dredged within the project area: Lower Manasquan River Channel, Crabtown Creek Channel, Kings Bridge Channel, Wills Hole Thorofare Channel, and Wills Hole West Channel. Table 1. Prioritization matrix for the State channels proposed to be dredged in the Manasquan River Complex, Ocean and Monmouth Counties, New Jersey. Channel Shoaling Usage Economic Logistical Volume Dredge Final Status Value Constraints - CY (CM) Material Rank Distance to the Composition CDF ft. (M) Upper Severe High Moderate 26,250 (8,000) 177,285 >75% fine Low Manasquan (135,500) River Lower Moderate High Moderate 18,000 (5,490) 35,694 Coarse with High Manasquan (27,290) some fine River Sawmill Severe High Low 21,750 (6,630) 42,706 >75% fine Low Creek (32,650) Glimmer Moderate Low Low Historic Bridge 10,508 >75% fine Low Glass (8,030) Watsons Moderate Moderate Low Historic Bridge 14,340 >75% fine Low Creek (11,000) Shermans Moderate Low Low Historic Bridge 5,138 >75% fine Low Creek (3,930) Crabtown Severe Moderate Low 4,750 (1,450) 10,763 >75% fine High Creek (8,230) Kings Moderate Low Low 3,250 (990) 8,681 >75% fine Mod Bridge (6,640) Channel Wills Hole Moderate Low High 2,750 (840) 45,899 Coarse with High Thorofare (35,100) some fine Wills Hole Moderate Low Low 7,500 (2,290) 12,827 >75% fine Mod West (9,800) Cooks Creek Minor Moderate High 2,750 (840) 1,676 >75% fine Low (1,280) 424 DREDGING SUMMIT & EXPO ’18 PROCEEDINGS Manasquan Severe Low Low 5,750 (1,750) 2,040 >75% fine Low Yacht Club (1,560) Clarkes Minor Moderate Moderate 9,250 (2,820) 3,372 >75% fine Low Landing (2,580) Gull Island Confined Disposal Facility Following an initial survey, it was determined that the Gull Island CDF had insufficient capacity for the channels targeted for priority dredging (approximately 26,000 CY (19,900 CM) of available air capacity in the pre-existing condition of the Gull Island CDF). Several reconstruction alternatives were investigated: excavating and raising the confining berms, expanding the existing CDF footprint, and reconstructing and restoring an existing bulkhead and area of historic fill on the east end of the island. Limited access for an in-depth geotechnical investigation, lack of as- built drawings and steep existing slopes (between 1.5 and 2:1, even steeper in some isolated areas) eliminated the alternative of raising the existing berms. Expanding the CDF footprint and/or restoring the existing bulkhead area would require a lengthy permitting and alternatives analysis process. Unfortunately, environmental windows for dredging in coastal NJ are very restrictive (typically 6-9 months), therefore an extensive permitting process could delay the project start for a year or more. Given the critical needs identified for this important resource, delays of this magnitude were not acceptable. From the engineering perspective, several issues were quickly identified. First, it had been previously determined that a very soft, organic soil layer was present about 10 ft.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Station Manasquan [Squan] Beach, New Jersey
    U.S. Coast Guard History Program Station Manasquan [Squan] Beach, New Jersey USLSS Station #9, Fourth District Coast Guard Station #105 1 mile southeast of Squan Beach; 40-06' 52"N x 74-01' 43"W in 1880; Location: 40-07' 00"N x 74-02' 00"W in 1915; 40-06' 12"N x 74-02' 30"W in 1977. Date of Conveyance: 1849 Station Built: 1856; 1936 Fate: Still in operation Squan Beach (#105) : More recently known as Manasquan and located at Point Pleasant, New Jersey, this station is believed to have been built in 1856, on property conveyed in 1849, located "one mile southeast of Squan village." In the 1902 Annual Report is that statement that "under a contract entered into during the year, the old station which has become unsuitable for occupancy at Squan Beach is 1 being replaced by a new structure." In 1938, the Work Relief and Public Works Appropriation Act provided funds for a combination boathouse and garage, workshop, and launch way. History: In 1846 an investigation into the wreck of the packet ship John Minturn at Mantoloking indicated the need for organized lifesaving efforts in the area. By 1849, The Federal Government had established eight lifesaving stations in the area, including one at Chadwick Beach. The volunteer crew of that station justified the service's existence in 1850 when they rescued 201 of 202 people from the Scottish brig Ayrshire. Six months earlier a wreck such as the Ayrshire would have meant certain death for all aboard. Since that time there has always been a lifesaving station in the northern end of Barnegat Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfront Public Access Guide for Barnegat
    Waterfront J Public Access Guide J1 ,.., to: , to: to: ", , ,.., .artt • to: to: t' ,~ ,.., ,.., ,.., to: , for Barnegat Bay Watershed ... ~ • National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration ,I [lJlEfP '\'i!!! ... '" U.S. Department of Commerce State of New Jersey i I DEP . I - Christine Todd Whitman, Governor I GV . I 191. 67 ..e· . Department of Environmental Protection ,W3 .>Ii Robert C. Shinn, Jr., Commissioner P83 • \,;y·cRTY OF NEW JEA::ln 1995 v.E.F'. !NFORMATION "lESC'lURCe CENTER INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to provide users with a guide to the waterfront public access opportunities in the Barnegat Bay watershed. The j Barnegat Bay, located in Ocean County, New Jersey, is a 75 square mile ecosystem. This environmentally sensitive estuary is replete with aquatic vegetation, shellfish beds, finfish habitats, waterfowl nesting grounds, and spectacular vistas. Much of the water in the Barnegat Bay drains from a watershed area of approximately 450 miles, encompassing most of Ocean County. The headwaters of the streams feeding the Bay are located in the Pine Barrens. Pristine water flows through predominantly forested areas as it follows the gentle slope of the coastal plain. As the flow moves eastward and the waterways increase in size, so too does the population inhabiting the adjacent land areas, whiC;h become primarily residential in nature. The watershed supports nearly 435,000 people year 'round, a population which more than doubles during the summer season. The Bay provides a shallow estuarine ecosystem which supports a riCh mix of species. For instance, it is a year-round nursery for winter flounder, nesting grounds for the endangered least tern, a critical overwintering site for large numbers of American black ducks and Atlantic brant, as well as a feeding site for populations of otters.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanitary Survey of Shellfish Growing Area NE5 Manasquan River December 2016
    NJ Department of Environmental Protection Water Monitoring and Standards Marine Water Monitoring Sanitary Survey of Shellfish Growing Area NE5 Manasquan River December 2016 i Sanitary Survey of Shellfish Growing Area NE5 Manasquan River New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) Bureau of Marine Water Monitoring (BMWM) Robert Schuster, Chief December 2016 Data from August 1, 2013 – August 31, 2016 Report prepared by: Tracy Fay, Principal Biologist Acknowledgements: This report was written under the direction of NJDEP WM&S administration. Special acknowledgment is given to the Boat Captains, the laboratory staff, and the technical and support staff. Cover Photo by Tracy Fay ii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................1 DESCRIPTION OF GROWING AREA .................................................................................................1 Location & Description........................................................................................................................... 1 Growing Area Classification Summary .................................................................................................. 2 Evaluation of Biological Resources ........................................................................................................ 3 SHORELINE SURVEY: EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL POLLUTION SOURCES ...................3 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reopening of the Manasquan Inlet
    Timelines of Point The 1931 Reopening of the Pleasant Manasquan Inlet History A Disaster Reversed in 1931 Did You Know: Left: The Manasquan Inlet in 1879. Above: The Closed Inlet The Point Pleasant Historical from Manasquan looking East. Society restored and duplicated the film Arthur Following the 1926 opening of what is now known as the Point Pleasant Canal a disaster struck the Johnson made of the inlet maritime communities of Point Pleasant Beach and vicinity. Water from the Manasquan River started reopening. It is part of Yesterday On Film, availble running through the canal and into Barnegat Bay, rather than down river and through the inlet to the on both DVD and VHS which ocean. The Manasquan Inlet closed completely. Sand built up behind the beach for several hundred yards. also preserves two silent movie era shorts, film Mr. Manasquan inlet had always been shallow, shifting and hard for large boats to navigate. There were no Johnson made of the local jetties and no dredging prior to the 1926 closing. All inlets naturally move, shoal, close and reopen. A rescue efforts following the detail from an 1879 Army Corps of Engineers map (shown to the right) illustrates the Manasquan Inlet Morro Castle ship fire making a sharp, hooking northward turn for about one thousand feet. Toward the top, it shows that in disaster, steam trains in 1868, the inlet had been a couple of thousand yards farther north along the Manasquan beach, near the Point Pleasant and other now recently abandoned Manasquan Coast Guard Station. In this map, the Core of Engineers was local scenes.
    [Show full text]
  • Manasquan River Estuary 1990 - 1995
    New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Science and Research Post Office Box 409, Trenton Water Monitoring Project Water Monitoring Management James E. Mumman, Administrator October 1996 REAPPRASAL OF MANASQUAN RIVER ESTUARY 1990 - 1995 Water Monitoring Report Prepared by: Bonnie Zimmer, Ph.D. Project Manager Bureau of Marine Water Monitoring William J. Eisele, Jr., Chief STATE OF NEW JERSEY CHRISTINE TODD WHITMAN GOVERNOR REAPPRASAL OF MANASQUAN RIVER ESTUARY 1990-1995 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ROBERT C. SHINN, Jr. COMMISSIONER This report was funded by a State General Appropriation and the Federal Clean Water Act ____________________________________ Date ____________ Written by: Bonnie J. Zimmer, Ph.D. Project Manager ____________________________________ Date ____________ Reviewed by: William J. Eisele, Jr. Bureau Chief ____________________________________ Date ____________ Approved by: James E. Mumman Administrator i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 1 DESCRIPTION 3 METHODS 6 BACTERIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION AND DATA ANALYSIS 7 SHORELINE SURVEY 8 IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF SOURCES 11 HYDROGRAPHY 11 WATER QUALITY 12 INTERPETATION AND DISCUSSION OF DATA 17 CONCLUSIONS 17 LITERATURE CITED 18 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 18 APPENDICES 19 i TABLES Table 1: Summary of Water Quality Data for the Manasquan River Estuary (1990-1995). 12 FIGURES Figure 1: Location of Manasquan River Estuary 4 Figure 2: Current Classification of Shellfish Waters in the Manasquan River Estuary. 5 Figure 3: Location of Sampling Stations in the Manasquan River Estuary 7 Figure 4: Land Use Patterns Adjacent to the Manasquan River Estuary 9 Figure 5: Representative Marinas Located in Manasquan Estuary 10 Figure 6: Potential Pollutant Sources in the Manasquan Estuary 11 Figure 7: Total Coliform Geometric Mean Values (1990-1995).
    [Show full text]
  • North Atlantic Ocean
    186 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 3, Chapter 4 26 SEP 2021 74°W 73°30'W Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 3—Chapter 4 NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml New York City NEW Y ORK 75°W 74°30'W Staten Island 40°30'N 12324 Sandy Hook 12325 NAVESINK RIVER SHREWSBURY RIVER Trenton 12326 MANASQUAN INLET 40°N Toms River Y NEW JERSEY A B T A G E N R BARNEGAT INLET A B MULLICA RIVER 39°30'N LITTLE EGG INLET 12323 Atlantic City ABSECON INLET GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET Ocean City NORTH ATL ANTIC OCEAN 12316 HEREFORD INLET 39°N 12318 CAPE MAY INLET Cape May 12317 26 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 3, Chapter 4 ¢ 187 New Jersey Coast (1) This chapter describes the coast of New Jersey from restricted to speeds of 10 knots or less in a Seasonal Sandy Hook to Cape May Point and the various inlets that Management Area existing around the Ports of New make into it from the Atlantic Ocean. Also discussed are York/New Jersey between November 1 and April 30. the resort towns of Atlantic City, Ocean City and Cape The area is defined as the waters within a 20-nm radius May. of 40°29'42.2"N., 73°55'57.6"W. (See 50 CFR 224.105 in chapter 2 for regulations, limitations and exceptions.) (2) ENCs - US4NY1AM, US4NY1BM, US4NJ23M, US5N- (11) J25M, US4NJ22M, US4DE12M, US4DE11M COLREGS Demarcation Lines Charts - 12326, 12323, 12318, 12304, 12214 (12) The lines established for New York Harbor and the inlets of the New Jersey coast are described 33 CFR (3) The coast of New Jersey extends in a general 80.165, 80.170, and 80.501, chapter 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Jersey Shore Magazine
    “Let us Shore to see w ta the ha ” ke wn t w d… BEACHCOMBER a journey do e can fin The Captain’s Cabinet This one-of-a-kind, historical artifact, crafted in the 1880s by Captain John Lott Dorsett of Point Pleasant, is made from the pieces of twenty-six 19th century vessels that wrecked off the Jersey Shore. Estimates of the total number of shipwrecks along the Jersey Shore vary widely, but it is a good assump- tion that it falls somewhere between two and three thousand. According to Dan Lieb, President of the New Jersey Historical Divers Association and Director of the New Jersey Shipwreck Museum in Wall Township, there’s most likely a wreck within a mile of wherever a person stands on a beach from Sandy Hook to Cape May. “Captain John Lott Dorsett knew a lot of people and had access to the wrecks up and down the coast,” said Lieb. Coleman Bryce mariner and a bayman. A builder brothers, and sons. The site of the A of ships and carver of decoys. A Dorsett boatyard was near what collector of memorabilia and memo- is known today as the Slade Dale ries. A poet and a storyteller. A man Sanctuary along Beaver Dam Creek of the people and of the sea… in Point Pleasant. Lifelong Point Pleasant resident In 1883, Dorsett finished building Captain John Lott Dorsett (1830- The Rosemond, a forty-six-foot long, 1910) embodied all of these roles three-masted ship that he sailed on and more. During his life, Captain Barnegat Bay during the turn-of-the- Dorsett was at the helm of the century.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfront Public Access Guide for Barnegat Bay Watershed
    You are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library Waterfront J Public Access Guide J1 ,.., ,.. , ,.. ,.. ", , ,.., ,.. ,.. artt • t' ,~ ,.., ,.., ,.., ,.. , for Barnegat Bay Watershed ... ~ • National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration [j)1E~ ~ U.S. Department ofCommerce - 1- ~~-~~.~..:::""'~ ~ State ofNew Jersey DEP A Christine Todd Whitman, Governor GV I 191.67 (i'.. Department of Environmental Protection ,W3 .>Ii Robert C. Shinn, Jr., Commissioner P83 • i\,JY\.:rHV OF NEW JEA::in 1995 v,E.F'. !NFORMATiON "lESO\JRCE CENTER You are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to provide users with a guide to the waterfront public access opportunities in the Barnegat Bay watershed. The j Barnegat Bay, located in Ocean County, New Jersey, is a 75 square mile ecosystem. This environmentally sensitive estuary is replete with aquatic vegetation, shellfish beds, finfish habitats, waterfowl nesting grounds, and spectacular vistas. Much of the water in the Barnegat Bay drains from a watershed area of approximately 450 miles, encompassing most ofOcean County. The headwaters of the streams feeding the Bay are located in the Pine Barrens. Pristine water flows through predominantly forested areas as it follows the gentle slope of the coastal plain. As the flow moves eastward and the waterways increase in size, so too does the population inhabiting the adjacent land areas, whiC;h become primarily residential in nature. The watershed supports nearly 435,000 people year 'round, a population which more than doubles during the summer season. The Bay provides a shallow estuarine ecosystem which supports a riCh mix of species.
    [Show full text]
  • Intracoastal Waterway
    198 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 3, Chapter 5 26 SEP 2021 74°W 73°30'W Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 3—Chapter 5 NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml New York City NEW Y ORK 75°W 74°30'W Staten Island 40°30'N 12324 Sandy Hook 12325 NAVESINK RIVER SHREWSBURY RIVER Trenton 12326 MANASQUAN INLET 40°N Toms River Y NEW JERSEY A B T A G E N R BARNEGAT INLET A B MULLICA RIVER 39°30'N LITTLE EGG INLET 12323 Atlantic City ABSECON INLET GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET Ocean City NORTH ATL ANTIC OCEAN 12316 HEREFORD INLET 39°W 12318 CAPE MAY INLET Cape May 12317 26 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 3, Chapter 5 ¢ 199 Intracoastal Waterway (1) The Intracoastal Waterway is a toll-free passage Guard Light Lists or Chart 1 (Nautical Chart Symbols and that roughly parallels the Atlantic Coast and extends 118 Abbreviations) for illustrations of special markings.) statute miles through bays, lagoons, thorofares and land (13) The Department of Environmental Protection, cuts from Manasquan Inlet to Delaware Bay at a point 2 State of New Jersey, maintains the aids to navigation miles north of Cape May Light. on the rivers and creeks that empty into the New Jersey (2) In addition to the Intracoastal Waterway and the Intracoastal Waterway. waters through which it passes, this chapter also describes (14) Lights and daybeacons should not be passed close the several rivers and tributaries that empty into these aboard because those marking dredged channels are waters, as well as some of the more important towns and usually placed back from the bottom edge of the channel landings along these waterways.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Island Beach New Jersey
    The Story of Island Beach New Jersey Thomas P Farner 200 Plus So Near, Yet So Far By THOMAS P. FARNER | May 26, 2016 Bridge to Barnegat light ------ Standing at the base of Barnegat Lighthouse looking north across Barnegat Inlet, we can see Island Beach State Park. Google Maps tells us it is 50 miles away and will take over an hour to drive there. From a distance, the park looks like a time capsule of the Jersey Shore 200 years ago. 1 Few people on the Long Beach Island side of the inlet know Island Beach’s story or have even been there. Its history involves a secret military project, an environmental disaster cover-up, and the now common battle between conservation and exploitation. The first notice of the area appears in a letter from Samuel Grooms, surveyor general for the East Jersey Proprietors, dated Aug. 11, 1683. “The tenth of next Month is also appointed to treat with other Indians to buy other tracts of choice Meadowing and Upland – and when I have been up in the country towards and at Barnegat, and agreed with the Indians thereabouts for such lands as we may see occasion to purchase in order to settlement there … but also, for the sake of the Whale Trade, and other fishing trade; which is like to be there shortly.” At this time the area was in fact an island, separated from the rest of the Barnegat Peninsula by an inlet. By the time of the American Revolution, it was owned mostly by William Alexander, Lord Stirling, who would become one of George Washington’s most trusted generals.
    [Show full text]
  • North Atlantic Ocean
    164New Jersey CoastVolume 3 WK3/2012 75° 74°30' 74° 73°30' General Index of Chart Coverage in Chapter 4 NEW YORK (see catalog for complete coverage) New York City Staten Island 40° 40° 30' 30' Sandy Hook NAVESINK RIVER SHREWSBURY RIVER 12324 Trenton 12326 MANASQUAN INLET 40° 40° Toms River Y NEW JERSEY A B T A G E N R BARNEGAT INLET A B MULLICA RIVER 39° 39° 30' 30' LITTLE EGG INLET 12323 Atlantic City ABSECON INLET GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET Ocean City NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN 12316 HEREFORD INLET 39° 39° 12318 CAPE MAY INLET Cape May 12317 75° 74°30' 74° 73°30' WK3/2012 Chapter 4New Jersey Coast165 New Jersey Coast (1) This chapter describes the coast of New Jersey from New York/New Jersey between November 1 and April 30. Sandy Hook to Cape May Point, and the various inlets The area is defined as the waters within a 20-nm radius which make into it from the Atlantic Ocean. Also dis- of 40°29'42.2"N., 73°55'57.6"W. (See 50 CFR 224.105 cussed are the resort towns of Atlantic City, Ocean City, in Chapter 2 for regulations, limitations, and excep- and Cape May. tions.) Charts 12326, 12323, 12318, 12304, 12214 COLREGS Demarcation Lines (9) The lines established for New York Harbor and the (2) The coast of New Jersey extends in a general south- inlets of the New Jersey coast are described 80.165, erly direction for 44 miles from Sandy Hook to Bar- 80.170, and 80.501, chapter 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Manasquan Inlet to Barnegat Inlet Feasibility Study
    New Jersey Shore Protection Study US Army Corps of Engineers New Jersey Department of Philadelphia District Environmental Protection Manasquan Inlet to Barnegat Inlet Feasibility Study Volume 1 Final Feasibility Report Integrated Environmental Impact Statement Appendix G* – Pertinent Correspondence June 2002 New Jersey Shore Protection Study Manasquan Inlet to Barnegat Inlet Final Feasibility Report Integrated Environmental Impact Statement June 2002 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Philadelphia District New Jersey Shore Protection Study Manasquan Inlet to Barnegat Inlet Final Feasibility Report and Integrated Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) June 2002 ABSTRACT: This feasibility report and Environmental Impact Statement presents findings of a study to determine a feasible hurricane and storm damage reduction plan for coastal communities located between Manasquan Inlet and Barnegat Inlet, NJ. The report describes the engineering, economic, social, and environmental analyses that were conducted to develop a selected plan of action. Potential impacts to cultural and environmental resources are evaluated herein in accordance with NEPA and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. NOTE TO READER: To provide full and convenient access to the environmental, economic, and engineering documentation prepared for the study, the EIS for this project has been integrated into this feasibility report in accordance with Engineering Regulation 1105-2-100. Sections required for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act
    [Show full text]