DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic Perspective for Uranium Enrichment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economic Perspective for Uranium Enrichment SIDEBAR 1: Economic Perspective for Uranium Enrichment he future demand for enriched are the customary measure of the effort uranium to fuel nuclear power required to produce, from a feed material plants is uncertain, Estimates of with a fried concentration of the desired T this demand depend on assump- isotope, a specified amount of product en- tions concerning projections of total electric riched to a specified concentration and tails, power demand, financial considerations, and or wastes, depleted to a specified concentra- government policies. The U.S. Department tion. For example, from feed material with a of Energy recently estimated that between uranium-235 concentration of 0.7 per cent now and the end of this century the gener- (the naturally occurring concentration), ation of nuclear power, and hence the need production of a kilogram of uranium enrich- for enriched uranium, will increase by a ed to about 3 per cent (the concentration factor of 2 to 3 both here and abroad. Sale of suitable for light-water reactor fuel) with tails enriched uranium to satisfy this increased depleted to 0.2 per cent requires about 4.3 demand can represent an important source SWU. of revenue for the United States, Through Gaseous diffusion is based on the greater fiscal year 1980 our cumulative revenues rate of diffusion through a porous barrier of from such sales amounted to over 7 billion the lighter component of a compressed dollars, and until recently foreign sales ac- gaseous mixture. For uranium enrichment counted for a major portion of this revenue. the gaseous mixture consists of uranium The sole source of enriched uranium until hexafluoride molecules containing 23$ 1974, the United States now supplies only uranium-235 ( UF6) or uranium-238 238 about 30 per cent of foreign demand, New ( UF6). The enrichment attainable per dif- enrichment capacity planned in this country fusion unit is quite low, being limited theo- should include means of reducing enrichment retically to less than the square root of the 238 235 costs to permit capturing a larger share of UF6 to UF6 mass ratio, or about 1.004. the foreign trade in this commodity. Laser Therefore, the slightly enriched product from isotope separation shows promise of ac- one diffusion unit, consisting of a com- complishing this goal. pressor and a diffusion chamber, is passed Currently, gaseous diffusion is the process through a second unit whose product in turn by which uranium is enriched at the is passed through a third unit, and so on. large-scale production facilities in the United (The theory of separative work and optimal States. Three such facilities exist (at Oak arrangement of separation units was Ridge, Tennessee; Paducah, Kentucky; and pioneered by R. E. Peierls and P. A. M. Portsmouth, Ohio) whose total enrichment Dirac.) To enrich uranium from 0.7 per cent capacity will soon reach 27.3 million separa- uranium-235 to about 3 per cent requires tive work units per year. approximately 1250 units, Gaseous diffusion Separative work units (abbreviated SWU) plants are therefore very large and expensive. 6 LOS ALAMOS SCIENCE Separating Isotopes With Lasers They have, however, proved very reliable. smaller, including only about ten separation The main disadvantage of the process is the units. In addition, the process would con- great amount of electric power required to sume an equal or lesser amount of energy operate the many compressors. A standard per SWU than the gas centrifuge. These gaseous diffusion plant operating at full advantages lead directly to reduced capital capacity demands about 3000 megawatts and operating costs. electric. For comparison, a typical large For a laser isotope separation process 235UF electric power plant produces 1000 mega- involving selective excitation of 6 watts electric. As the cost of electric power molecules with infrared lasers and their dis- increases, its consumption becomes an in- sociation with an ultraviolet laser, a facility creasingly important factor in the cost of with the standard capacity of 8.75 millions enriched uranium. (In fiscal year 1980 about SWU per year is estimated to cost about 1 75 per cent of the production costs at billion dollars. (Laser casts account for ap- gaseous diffusion plants was for electricity.) proximately half of the direct capital costs.) With the expectation of reducing power This is considerably lower than the estimated consumption, attention is now focused on cost of a new gaseous diffusion plant (about the gas centrifuge, another method for en- 5 billion dollars) or that of a gas centrifuge riching uranium. The Gas Centrifuge Enrich- plant (about 6 billion dollars). The annual ment Plant now being constructed at operating cost for a laser isotope separation Portsmouth, Ohio will contribute 8.75 mil- facility is estimated to be about 100 million lion SWU per year to the national enrich- dollars, in contrast to about 500 million for a ment capacity by 1994. In a gas centrifuge gaseous diffusion plant and 100 to 200 235 238 UF 6 and UF 6 are separated by the million for a gas centrifuge plant. Our esti- centrifugal force imposed on UF6 by a mates of capital and operating costs for a rapidly rotating container. For this process a laser isotope separation facility indicate a considerably smaller number of centrifuge cost per SWU of about $30; the current units (less than 10) are required to reach the commercial cost for enriched uranium is desired enrichment. However, the through- $110 per SWU. put per centrifuge unit is very small com- The considerably lower cost per SWU for pared to that of a diffusion unit-so small, in laser isotope separation opens the possibility fact, that it is not compensated by the higher of turning the large stockpile of wastes from enrichment per unit. To produce the same gaseous diffusion plants into a valuable amount of reactor-grade fuel requires a con- uranium resource. These wastes contain siderably larger number (approximately 23S about a third of the UF6 originally present 50,000 to 500,000] of centrifuge units than in the feed material and are estimated to diffusion units. This disadvantage, however, amount to more than 500,000 metric tons by is outweighed by the considerably lower (by the end of 1990—an amount containing a factor of 20) energy consumption per enough uranium-235 for 1800 reactor-years SWU for the gas centrifuge. of operation. Compared to diffusion and the centrifuge, These advantages imply that laser isotope laser isotope separation offers the potential separation should be thoroughly investigated for much greater enrichment and throughput as a potentially economical process for per separation unit. Therefore, a laser large-scale production of enriched isotope separation facility would be much uranium. ■ LOS ALAMOS SCIENCE 7.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Behaviour of Polytetrafluoroethylene at High Pressure
    THE BEHAVIOUR OF POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE AT HIGH PRESSURE by Haroun Mahgerefteh A dissertation submitted to the University of London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemical Technology, Imperial College, London SW7 2BY. October 1984 If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end in doubts, but if he will be content to begin with doubts, he shall end in certainties. Robin Hyman TO MY PARENTS PREFACE This dissertation is a description of the work carried out in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemical Technology, Imperial College, London between October 1981 and October 1984. Except where acknowledged, the material presented is the original work of the author and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration, and no part of it has been submitted for a degree at any other Univer­ sity. I am deeply indebted to Dr. Brian Briscoe for his excellent super­ vision during the course of my research. His help and guidance have been invaluable. It has been a pleasure to receive the help of many members of the Department, in particular Messrs. D. Wood and M. Dix of Electronics and Mr. B. Lucas of the Workshop. The help and support from all the members of my family especially my sister Deborah have been invaluable. I also thank Mrs. Joyce Burberry for patiently typing the manuscript. I gratefully acknowledge the support of the Science and Engineering Research Council and Imperial Chemical Industries PLC for the provision of a CASE studentship. Imperial College, H. Margerefteh
    [Show full text]
  • The Taming of “49” Big Science in Little Time
    The Taming of “49” Big science in little time Recollections of Edward F. Hammel During the Manhattan Project, plutonium was often referred to, simply, as 49. Number 4 was for the last digit in 94 (the atomic number of plutonium) and 9 for the last digit in plutonium-239, the isotope of choice for nuclear weapons. The story that unfolds was adapted from Plutonium Metallurgy at Los Alamos, 1943–1945, as Edward F. Hammel remembers the events of those years. 48 Los Alamos Science Number 26 2000 The Taming of “49” he work in plutonium chemistry tion work was an inevitable conse- the metal could be fabricated into and metallurgy carried out at quence of the nuclear and physical satisfactory weapon components. TLos Alamos (Site Y) between research that was still to be conducted In addition, not until January 1944 1943 and 1945 had a somewhat contro- on the metal. It would clearly have did the first few milligrams of pile- versial history. The controversy was been inefficient and time consuming to produced plutonium arrive at Los about who was going to do what. ship small amounts of plutonium metal Alamos. The first 1-gram shipment At the time Los Alamos was being back to Chicago for repurification and arrived in February 1944, and quantity organized, most of the expertise in plu- refabrication into different sizes and shipments of plutonium did not begin to tonium chemistry resided at Berkeley, shapes for the next-scheduled nuclear arrive at Los Alamos until May 1945. where plutonium was discovered in physics experiment. From the outset, it was clear that the December 1940, and at the Met Lab in Minimizing the time spent to solve purification of plutonium was the most Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • Laser Isotope Separation (LIS), Technical and Economic
    NASA TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM A STATUS OF PROGRESS FOR THL LASER lsofopE SEPARATION (11 SI PROCESS +tear 1976 NASA George C. Mdr~bdlSpace Flight Center Marshdl Space Fb$t Center, Alabama lLSFC - Form 3190 (Rev June 1971) REPORT STANDARD TITLE PACE I nEPMTn0. 3. RECIPIENT*$ CATILOC NO. NASA TM X-73345 10 TITLE UO SUTlTLt IS. REPORT DATE I September A st.tUaof for Iaser isotOpe &paratian lS76 I Progress the (LIS) 6 PERFWYIIIG WGUIZATIO* CQOE George C. M8ralmll!3gam Flight Center I 1. COUTRUT OR am yo. I MarW Flight Center, Alabama 35812 Tecbnid Memormdum National Aemutics and Space Administration Washingtan, D.C. 20546 I I Prepared by Systems Aaalysis and Integration Iaboratory, Science and Engineering An overview of the various categories of the LE3 methodology is given together with illustrations showing a simplified version of the LIS tecbnique, an example of the two-phoiin photoionization category, and a diagram depicting how the energy levels of various isdope influence the LIS process. A&icatlons have been proposed for the LIS system which, in addition to the use to enrich uranium, could in themselves develop into programs of tremendous scope and breadth. Such applications as treatment of radioac '--ewastes from light-water nKzlear reactors, enriching the deuterlum isotope to make heavv-water, and enrlchhg tik light isotopes of such 17 KEt WORDS 18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT 5ECUQlTY CLASSIF. Ff thh PI*) 21 NO. OF PAbFS 22 PRICE Unclassified Unclassified I 20 NTIS PREFACE Since the publication of t& first Techid hiemomxitun (TM X-64947) on the Laser hotope Separation (LE)process in May 1975 [l], there bbeen a virtual explosion of available information on this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensive Interest in Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies
    Institute for Science and International Security ISIS REPORT March 19, 2012 Department 70 and the Physics Research Center: Extensive Interest in Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies By David Albright, Paul Brannan, Mark Gorwitz, and Andrew Ortendahl On February 23, 2012, ISIS released the report, The Physics Research Center and Iran’s Parallel Military Nuclear Program, in which ISIS evaluated a set of 1,600 telexes outlining a set of departments or buying centers of the former Physics Research Center (PHRC). These departments appeared to be purchasing a variety of goods for specific nuclear technologies, including gas centrifuges, uranium conversion, uranium exploration and perhaps mining, and heavy water production. Figure 1 is a list of the purposes of these departments. The telexes are evaluated in more depth in the February 23, 2012 ISIS report and support that, contrary to Iran’s statements to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the PHRC ran a parallel military nuclear program in the 1990s. In the telexes, ISIS identified a department called Department 70 that is linked to the PHRC. This department tried to procure or obtained technical publications and reports from a document center, relevant know-how from suppliers, catalogues from suppliers about particular goods, and a mini- computer from the Digital Equipment Corporation. Department 70 appears to have had personnel highly knowledgeable about the existing literature on a variety of fuel cycle technologies, particularly gas centrifuges. Orders to a British document center reveal many technical publications about gas centrifuges, atomic laser isotope enrichment, the production of uranium compounds including uranium tetrafluoride and uranium hexafluoride (and precursors such as hydrofluoric acid), nuclear grade graphite, and the production of heavy water.
    [Show full text]
  • An Instrumented Centrifuge for Studying Mouse Locomotion and Behaviour Under Hypergravity Benjamin J
    © 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Biology Open (2019) 8, bio043018. doi:10.1242/bio.043018 METHODS AND TECHNIQUES An instrumented centrifuge for studying mouse locomotion and behaviour under hypergravity Benjamin J. H. Smith* and James R. Usherwood ABSTRACT (Alexander, 1984). Investigating the limitations of inverted Gravity may influence multiple aspects of legged locomotion, from the pendulum models of locomotion may lead to advances in robotics periods of limbs moving as pendulums to the muscle forces required and treatment of gait pathologies, as well as our fundamental to support the body. We present a system for exposing mice to understanding of legged locomotion. hypergravity using a centrifuge and studying their locomotion and The motion of an inverted pendulum can be described using u€ ¼ g u u€ activity during exposure. Centrifuge-induced hypergravity has the the equation L sin , where is angular acceleration, g is θ advantages that it both allows animals to move freely, and it affects gravitational acceleration, L is length, and is angular displacement both body and limbs. The centrifuge can impose two levels of from the equilibrium point; testing the predictions of inverted hypergravity concurrently, using two sets of arms of different lengths, pendulum-based models therefore requires the manipulation of either each carrying a mouse cage outfitted with a force and speed L or g. Differences in L are usually studied by comparing similar measuring exercise wheel and an infrared high-speed camera; both animals of different sizes (Gatesy and Biewener, 1991; Daley and triggered automatically when a mouse begins running on the wheel.
    [Show full text]
  • PHYSICS of ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY Angie Bukley1, William Paloski,2 and Gilles Clément1,3
    Chapter 2 PHYSICS OF ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY Angie Bukley1, William Paloski,2 and Gilles Clément1,3 1 Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA 2 NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA 3 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France This chapter discusses potential technologies for achieving artificial gravity in a space vehicle. We begin with a series of definitions and a general description of the rotational dynamics behind the forces ultimately exerted on the human body during centrifugation, such as gravity level, gravity gradient, and Coriolis force. Human factors considerations and comfort limits associated with a rotating environment are then discussed. Finally, engineering options for designing space vehicles with artificial gravity are presented. Figure 2-01. Artist's concept of one of NASA early (1962) concepts for a manned space station with artificial gravity: a self- inflating 22-m-diameter rotating hexagon. Photo courtesy of NASA. 1 ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY: WHAT IS IT? 1.1 Definition Artificial gravity is defined in this book as the simulation of gravitational forces aboard a space vehicle in free fall (in orbit) or in transit to another planet. Throughout this book, the term artificial gravity is reserved for a spinning spacecraft or a centrifuge within the spacecraft such that a gravity-like force results. One should understand that artificial gravity is not gravity at all. Rather, it is an inertial force that is indistinguishable from normal gravity experience on Earth in terms of its action on any mass. A centrifugal force proportional to the mass that is being accelerated centripetally in a rotating device is experienced rather than a gravitational pull.
    [Show full text]
  • Current & Future Uranium Enrichment Technologies
    The History of the Gas Centrifuge and Its Role in Nuclear Proliferation Houston Wood, Professor Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering University of Virginia Presented at Wilson Center Washington, D.C. January 20, 2010 Early Days • Isotopes were discovered in early 1900’s. • Centrifuge separation of isotopes first suggested by Lindemann and Aston (1919) • Chapman, Mulliken, Harkens and others tried unsuccessful experiments. • First successful experiments at UVA in 1934 by Prof. Jesse Beams with isotopes of Chlorine. • Attempts to use centrifuges in Manhattan project were unsuccessful. 20 January 2010 Houston Wood Professor Jesse W. Beams University of Virginia 1898 - 1977 20 January 2010 Houston Wood Early Days at UVA • Work on centrifuges during Manhattan project had a number of failures. • Project was terminated. • Concern over potential competition from German centrifuges led AEC to restart work at UVA in 1955 under guidance of A.R. Kulthau. 20 January 2010 Houston Wood Meanwhile in Europe • German research was being led by Konrad Beyerle in Göttingen and Wilhelm Groth at University of Bonn • Research in the Netherlands was being directed by Jacob Kistemaker. 20 January 2010 Houston Wood USSR • At the end of WWII, Soviets took many POWs from Germany. • They started effort to develop nuclear weapons. • Organization at Sinop: – Von Ardenne – Electromagnetic Separation – Thiessen – Gaseous Diffusion – Steenbeck Group – Included Centrifuge 20 January 2010 Houston Wood USSR (cont’d) • Competition between gaseous diffusion and gas centrifuge. • Reputed problems with GD enriching to weapons grade level. • Centrifuge considered for “topping off.” • Competition for long rotor vs. short rotor. • Steenbeck group transferred from Sinop to Kirov plant in Leningrad (~1951).
    [Show full text]
  • Continuous-Flow Centrifugation to Collect Suspended Sediment for Chemical Analysis
    1 Table 6. Compounds detected in both equipment blank samples and not in corresponding source blank samples or at concentrations greater than two times the corresponding source blank sample concentration. Prepared in cooperation with the National Water Quality Monitoring Council and [Source data: Appendix A, table A1; Conn and Black (2014, table A4); and Conn and others (2015, table A11). CAS Registry Number: Chemical Abstracts Service Washington State Department of(CAS) Ecology Registry Number® (RN) is a registered trademark of the American Chemical Society. CAS recommends the verifi cation of CASRNs through CAS Client ServicesSM. Method: EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s SW 846; SIM, select ion monitoring. Unit: µg/kg, microgram per kilogram; ng/kg, nanogram per kilogram. Sample type: River samples were from the Puyallup River, Washington. Q, qualifi er (blank cells indicate an unqualifi ed detection). J, estimated, result between the Continuous-Flow Centrifugationdetection level and reporting level; toNJ, result Collect did not meet all quantitation Suspended criteria (an estimated maxiumum possible concentration is reported in Result column) U, not detected above the reporting level (reported in the Result column); UJ, not detected above the detection level (reported in the Result column). Abbreviations: na, not Sediment for Chemicalapplicable; Analysis PCBs, polychlorinated biphenyls] Sample type Chapter 6 of CAS River River Commercial Commercial Section D, Water Quality Parameter name Registry Method Unit source equipment
    [Show full text]
  • Gas Centrifuge Technology: Proliferation Concerns and International Safeguards Brian D
    Gas Centrifuge Technology: Proliferation Concerns and International Safeguards Brian D. Boyer Los Alamos National Laboratory Trinity Section American Nuclear Society Santa Fe, NM November 7, 2014 Acknowledgment to M. Rosenthal (BNL), J.M. Whitaker (ORNL), H. Wood (UVA), O. Heinonen (Harvard Belfer School), B. Bush (IAEA-Ret.), C. Bathke (LANL) for sources of ideas, information, and knowledge UNCLASSIFIED Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's NNSA Enrichment / Proliferation / Safeguards . Enrichment technology – The centrifuge story . Proliferation of technology – Global Networks . IAEA Safeguards – The NPT Bargain Enrichment Proliferation Safeguards U.S. DOE Centrifuges – DOE / Pres. George W. Bush at ORNL B. Boyer and K. Akilimali - IAEA Zippe Centrifuge – Deutsches Museum (Munich) briefed on seized Libyan nuclear Safeguards Verifying Spent Fuel in www.deutsches-museum.de/en/exhibitions/energy/energy-technology/nuclear-energy/ equipment (ORNL) Training in Sweden (Ski-1999) UNCLASSIFIED 2 Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's NNSA The Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Proliferation Paths to WMDs IAEA Safeguards On URANIUM Path Weapon Assembly Convert UF6 to U Metal Pre-Safeguards Natural Enriched DIVERSION Material (INFCIRC/153) Uranium Uranium PATH “Open” Cycle WEAPONS PATHS Fuel – Natural Uranium or LEU In closed cycle – MOX Fuel (U and Pu) “Closed” Cycle IAEA Safeguards On PLUTONIUM Path Convert Pu Plutonium Compounds to Pu Metal DIVERSION PATH To Repository
    [Show full text]
  • Basics in Centrifugation - Eppendorf Handling Solutions Page 1 of 5
    Basics in Centrifugation - Eppendorf Handling Solutions Page 1 of 5 Menu • Home • Sample Handling • Centrifugation • Safe Use of Centrifuges • Basics in Centrifugation Basics in Centrifugation • Biosafety • Safe Use of Centrifuges • Centrifugation Applications • This and That • Braking Ramps • Thermal Conductivity • Centrifuge Maintenance • Ergonomics • share • tweet • share • mail Basics in Centrifugation Centrifugation is a technique that helps to separate mixtures by applying centrifugal force. A centrifuge is a device, generally driven by an electric motor, that puts an object, e.g., a rotor, in a rotational movement around a fixed axis. A centrifuge works by using the principle of sedimentation: Under the influence of gravitational force (g-force), substances separate according to their density. Different types of separation are known, including isopycnic, ultrafiltration, density gradient, phase separation, and pelleting. https://handling-solutions.eppendorf.com/sample-handling/centrifugation/safe-use-of-cent... 10/24/2018 Basics in Centrifugation - Eppendorf Handling Solutions Page 2 of 5 Pelleting is the most common application for centrifuges. Here, particles are concentrated as a pellet at the bottom of the centrifuge tube and separated from the remaining solution, called supernatant. During phase separation, chemicals are converted from a matrix or an aqueous medium to a solvent (for additional chemical or molecular biological analysis). In ultrafiltration, macromolecules are purified, separated, and concentrated by using a membrane. Isopycnic centrifugation is carried out using a "self- generating" density gradient established through equilibrium sedimentation. This method concentrates the analysis matches with those of the surrounding solution. Protocols for centrifugation typically specify the relative centrifugal force (rcf) and the degree of acceleration in multiples of g (g-force).
    [Show full text]
  • 404 Sedimentation Handout
    Sedimentation for Analysis and Separation of Macromolecules A ‘centrifugal force’ as experienced by particles in a centrifuge actually reflects the natural tendency of the particle to move in a straight line in the absence of external forces. If we view the experiment in the (fixed) reference frame of the laboratory, we observe that the particle is deflected from a linear trajectory by a centripetal force (directed toward the central axis of the rotor). However, when we consider the motion of the particle with respect to the (rotating) reference frame of the rotor, it appears that at any instant the particle experiences an outward or centrifugal force: Instantaneous Velocity (vtang) Centrifugal Acceleration Centripetal Acceleration As seen in laboratory As seen in (rotating) reference frame reference frame of rotor Ignoring buoyancy effects for the moment, the magnitude of the centrifugal force (which, in the rotating reference frame of the rotor, is as real as any other force) is m ⋅ v2 F = objecttan g =⋅mrω 2 centrif r object [1] where r is the distance from the axis of rotation, vtang is the linear velocity at any instant (in the direction perpendicular to the radial axis) and ω is the angular velocity (in radians sec-1 – note that 1 rpm = 2π///60 rad sec-1). The magnitude of this force can be compared to that of the gravitational force at the earth’s surface: Gm⋅()⋅() m = earth object Fgrav 2 re [2] -8 -1 3 -2 where G is the universal gravitational constant (= 6.67 x 10 g cm sec ) and re and me are the earth’s radius (= 6.37 x 108 cm) and mass (5.976 x 1027 g), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Viable Route for Lithium-6 Supply of DEMO and Future Fusion Power Plants T
    Fusion Engineering and Design 149 (2019) 111339 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fusion Engineering and Design journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fusengdes Development of a viable route for lithium-6 supply of DEMO and future fusion power plants T T. Giegerich⁎, K. Battes, J.C. Schwenzer, C. Day Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: In the European DEMO program, the design development of a demonstration power plant (DEMO) is currently in DEMO its pre-conceptual phase. In DEMO, breeding blankets will use large quantities of lithium, enriched in the isotope Lithium-6 lithium-6 (6Li), for breeding the tritium needed to feed the DT fusion reaction. Unfortunately, enriched lithium is Lithium enrichment commercially not available in the required quantities, which is threatening the success of future power plant ICOMAX process applications of nuclear fusion. Even if the manufacturing of the breeding blankets is still two decades ahead of Mercury us, it is now mandatory to address the topic of lithium-6 supply and to make sure that a viable supply (and HgLab reprocessing) route is available when needed. This paper presents an unbiased systems engineering approach assessing a number of available lithium iso- tope separation methods by defining requirements, rating them systematically and finally calculating a ranking number expressing the value of different methods. As a result, we suggest using a chemical exchange method based on a lithium amalgam system, but including some important improvements leading to a more efficient and ‘clean’ process (the ICOMAX process) in comparison with the formerly used COLEX process.
    [Show full text]