A Plea of Infancy, Interposed for the Purpose of Defeating an Action
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
I'ratt-THOMAS I Shannon Hudson, Esq
I'RATT- 18 CHARLOTTE STREET PHONE: 843.727.2200 THOMAS I WALKER CHARLESTON, SC 29403 FAX: 843.727.2238 ATTORNEYS AT LAW PO ORAWER 22247 paoFass(SHAL assoc(ST(oo WWW.P. TW.COM CHARLESTON, SC 29413.2241 February 12, 2016 E-MAIL:gtwep-tw.corn DIRECT DIAL: 843.727.22O8 FAX: 843.727.2231 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Jocelyn D. Boyd Chief Clerk and Administrator Public Service Commission 101 Executive Center Drive, Suite 100 Columbia, SC 29210 Re: A lication of Kiawah Island Utilit Inc. Our File No.: 5435.002 Dear Ms. Boyd: Enclosed for filing please find the Application of Kiawah Island Utility, Inc. for Approval to Enter into Amended and Restated Utility Service Agreement, for Expedited Consideration and Waiver of Hearing, Certificate of Service, and Docket Cover Sheet. A docket number has not yet been assigned. Thank you for processing this Application at the Commission's earliest convenience. With kind regards, I am, Sincerely, PRATT-THOMAS VVALKER, P.A. G. Trenholm Walker GTVNnjd Enclosures (As noted) c: F. David Butler, Esq. C. Dukes Scott, Esq. Dawn Hipp Shannon Hudson, Esq. Andrew Bateman, Esq. Becky Dennis (By Email) Townsend Clarkson (By Email) E. oouotas FRavTTHOMas ( o. vosouo(M waLKER I w. aooREw oowoER, 38. L. ausvso K. (388 (uuosav sMnuvaocEv (sc, Nc( I THOMas H. Hssss (sc, oa( HIN w. FREEMAN (sc, ca) THoMAO P. SREOOETTE, 3R. KATHLEEN ( (sc, Usvu ( FowLER M08oc I 30HN P. LINTQN, 3R. Jocelyn Boyd RE: KIIJ Water Rate Increase February 12, 2016 Page 2 Patrick Melton (By Email) H. C. "Trey" Howell, III, Esq. -
State Appeal Bond Reforms Protect Defendants' Due
WLF Legal Backgrounder Washington Legal Foundation Advocate for freedom and justice® 2009 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 202.588.0302 Vol. 19 No. 42 November 12, 2004 STATE APPEAL BOND REFORMS PROTECT DEFENDANTS’ DUE PROCESS RIGHTS by Glenn G. Lammi and Justin P. Hauke Over the past several years, defendants in civil litigation have pursued reform of state laws and rules which require them to post a bond prior to appealing an adverse judgment. Reform proponents have not taken issue with the requirement. Rather, they have sought reasonable reductions in the amount of the bond which, considering the skyrocketing damage awards that have now become commonplace, threaten their fundamental right to appeal. This LEGAL BACKGROUNDER will examine the appeal bond requirement, the factors which have contributed to the push for reform, the types of changes that have been adopted, and what additional steps may be taken to protect defendants’ rights. “Supersedeas” Bonds. In all but five states,1 defendants wishing to appeal adverse verdicts must post a “supersedeas” bond with the presiding trial court. Such bonds protect plaintiffs by guaranteeing that a civil defendant will have assets sufficient to satisfy the judgment if appeal efforts ultimately fail. Some jurisdictions have allowed the trial judge to set the amount of the bond. Laws in other states required that presiding judges impose a bond of at least 100% of the judgment, plus fees, interest, and costs. Many of those laws also denied judges the discretion to reduce or waive the bond. Notably, states have never imposed any similar financial responsibilities on plaintiffs who wish to appeal verdicts. -
Ambac Assurance Corporation ASSETS Current Statement Date 4 1 2 3 Net Admitted December 31 Nonadmitted Assets Prior Year Net Assets Assets (Cols
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION 11111 11111 1 11111111 11 II II 11111111 1111111 18 08 11 12 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 * QUARTERLY STATEMENT As of June 30, 2018 of the Condition and Affairs of the Ambac Assurance Corporation NAIC Group Code 1248, 1248 NAIC Company Code 18708 Employer's ID Number 39-1135174 (Current Period) (Prior Period) Organized under the Laws of WI State of Domicile or Port of Entry WI Country of Domicile US Incorporated/Organized February 25, 1970 Commenced Business . March 16, 1970 Statutory Home Office c/o Dewitt Ross & Stevens S.C., 2 East Mifflin Street, Suite 600 Madison, WI US 53703 (Street and Number) (City or Town, State, Country and Zip Code) Main Administrative Office One State Street Plaza New York, NY US 10004 212-658-7470 (Street and Number) (City or Town, State, Country and Zip Code) (Area Code) (Telephone Number) Mail Address One State Street Plaza New York, NY US 10004 (Street and Number or P. 0. Box) (City or Town, State, Country and Zip Code) Primary Location of Books and Records One State Street Plaza New York, NY US 10004 212-658-7470 (Street and Number) (City or Town, State, Country and Zip Code) (Area Code) (Telephone Number) Internet Web Site Address http://www.ambac.com Statutory Statement Contact Stephen Michael Ksenak 212-658-7470 (Name) (Area Code) (Telephone Number) (Extension) mailto:SKsenakQambac.com 212-208-3558 (E-Mail Address) (Fax Number) OFFICERS Name Title Name Title 1 . Claude LeBlanc President and Chief Executive Officer 2. David Trick Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer 3. -
Superseding Money Judgments in Texas: Four Proposed Reforms to Help the Business Litigant and to Further Improve the Texas Civil Justice System
St. Mary's Law Journal Volume 51 Number 1 Article 3 1-2020 Superseding Money Judgments in Texas: Four Proposed Reforms to Help the Business Litigant and to Further Improve the Texas Civil Justice System James Holmes Holmes PLLC Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.stmarytx.edu/thestmaryslawjournal Part of the Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Civil Law Commons, Civil Procedure Commons, Corporate Finance Commons, Courts Commons, Legal Remedies Commons, Legislation Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation James Holmes, Superseding Money Judgments in Texas: Four Proposed Reforms to Help the Business Litigant and to Further Improve the Texas Civil Justice System, 51 ST. MARY'S L.J. 69 (2020). Available at: https://commons.stmarytx.edu/thestmaryslawjournal/vol51/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the St. Mary's Law Journals at Digital Commons at St. Mary's University. It has been accepted for inclusion in St. Mary's Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Commons at St. Mary's University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Holmes: Superseding Money Judgments in Texas ARTICLE SUPERSEDING MONEY JUDGMENTS IN TEXAS: FOUR PROPOSED REFORMS TO HELP THE BUSINESS LITIGANT AND TO FURTHER IMPROVE THE TEXAS CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM JAMES HOLMES* I. Introduction ............................................................................................. 71 II. The Problems Under the Existing Supersedeas Laws ....................... 77 A. The Acute Insensitivity of Present Supersedeas Laws for Smaller Business Litigation Defendants, Particularly as They Are Found in Texas ............................................................... 77 B. The Problem with Trial-Court Discretion in Present Supersedeas Practice, and the Difficulty of Obtaining Appellate Relief ............................................................................... -
Subdivision Case #SDP-000014-2018
Town of Kiawah Island Planning Commission December 5, 2018 Town of Kiawah Island Planning Commission Town of Kiawah Island Municipal Center 4475 Betsy Kerrison Parkway Kiawah Island, SC 29455 December 5, 2018 #SDP‐000014‐2018 A Preliminary Subdivision Plat Approval of Beachwalker East Parcel 13 ‐ Southern Pines Lane ROW Applicant/Owner: Kiawah Resort Associates, LP Surveyor: SW & A Surveying, LLC. Parcel(s): 207‐05‐00‐001; ‐118; ‐122; ‐123; 124 Zoning District: R‐3/C Acres: 22.604 (14.88 highlands) Lot(s): 2 Lots (20.811 acres, 13.667 highlands) 2 ROWs (1.215 acres) 1 Town of Kiawah Island Planning Commission December 5, 2018 Insert Aerial If Necessary Delete If Not Insert Aerial If Necessary Delete If Not 2 Town of Kiawah Island Planning Commission December 5, 2018 Approved Revised Final Plat Insert Plat Proposed Preliminary Plat Insert Plat 3 Town of Kiawah Island Planning Commission December 5, 2018 #SDP‐000014‐2018 Abbreviated Time Line of Beachwalker East Parcel 13 • The Planning Commission (PC) approved a preliminary subdivision plat at the May 2016 PC meeting. The PC agreed to have the applicant come to the following June 2016 PC meeting to address specific concerns raised (traffic, security and access). • At the June 2016 PC meeting the applicant provided a detailed explanation of the Conceptual Master Plan for Parcel 13 including the depicted circulation pattern and residential (R‐3) land use pattern also affirming there will be no connection to Duneside Road. • Subsequently in the plat approval process, a conditional subdivision plat was approved by planning staff in August 2016. -
Cases on Procedure Annotated, Trial and Appellate Practice, By
_ CHAPTER X. DISPOSITION OF CASE UPON REVIEW. SECTION 1. HEARING AND REHEARING. BRODIE v. FITZGERALD. Supreme Court of Arkansas. 1892. 55 Arkansas, 460. COCKRILL, C. J . The case comes up on a motion to advance it on the docket for hearing out of its regular order, upon the suggestion that the public interest is involved. The mo tion sets forth the following state of facts: “Alexander Haker devised to Edward Fitzgerald, as bishop of the Cath olic Church, certain real property in the city of Little Rock, Arkansas, the rents and profits of which were to be used in maintaining a hospital in said city. Soon thereafter Edward Fitzgerald obtained from the Pulaski chancery court an in junction restraining John Brodie, as county clerk, from ex tending the taxes against said property, which consists of and is rented for store-houses and dwellings.” According to the numerical practice of this court, no case can be taken up out of its order in the calendar, even by consent, where private or local interests only are concerned, unless the stat ute has otherwise specified. It is incumbent upon the court to see to it that the unnecessary advancement of causes out of their order does no injustice to other litigants, the hearing of whose causes has already been delayed by the crowded state of the docket. Vaught '0. Green, 51 Ark. 378, 11 S. W. Rep. 587. The fact that a case is of public importance or interest, or that the interest of many persons in many local ities depend upon it, does not, of itself, entitle the parties to have it heard out of its order. -
Exhibit 13.15: Cassique PDD Application 10.04.13 (Attached)
Exhibit 13.15: Cassique PDD Application 10.04.13 (attached) permar Cassique Courtyard Homes Planned Development District Application Charleston County, South Carolina Kiawah Development Partners, Inc. 7 Beachwalker Drive Kiawah Island, SC 29455 November 2004 November 8, 2004 Ms. Brana S. Rerig, AICP Project Officer II Charleston County Planning Department 4045 Bridge View Drive North Charleston, SC 29405-7464 RE: Cassique Courtyard Homes Planned Development District Application Dear Ms. Rerig: In accordance with provisions of the Charleston County Zoning and Land Development Regulations, Articles 3.4 and 3.5, please find attached an application for a zoning map amendment request to rezone approximately 81 acres of property within Cassique, a recreation oriented community located between Kiawah Island and Seabrook Island, to a Planned Development District. It is the intent of the application to provide for certain standards (i.e. lot sizes, setbacks, building configuration, etc.) that would permit siting flexibility of detached and attached single family homes. It is important to note the density limits/standards and listing of permitted uses for the existing RSL Zoning Classification would be retained. This application would specifically address those planning guidelines that would provide a diverse housing type for the market. The proposed application is consistent with the Charleston County Comprehensive Plan regarding long range land use patterns. Included for your review and evaluation are a Charleston County Zoning Change application, fee, property description, and supporting graphics and exhibits. The applicant and associated team members look forward to participating in your review. Sincerely yours, Mark Permar cc: Mr. Charles P. Darby, III Mr. -
An Access-Dictionary of Internationalist High Tech Latinate English
An Access-Dictionary of Internationalist High Tech Latinate English Excerpted from Word Power, Public Speaking Confidence, and Dictionary-Based Learning, Copyright © 2007 by Robert Oliphant, columnist, Education News Author of The Latin-Old English Glossary in British Museum MS 3376 (Mouton, 1966) and A Piano for Mrs. Cimino (Prentice Hall, 1980) INTRODUCTION Strictly speaking, this is simply a list of technical terms: 30,680 of them presented in an alphabetical sequence of 52 professional subject fields ranging from Aeronautics to Zoology. Practically considered, though, every item on the list can be quickly accessed in the Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary (RHU), updated second edition of 2007, or in its CD – ROM WordGenius® version. So what’s here is actually an in-depth learning tool for mastering the basic vocabularies of what today can fairly be called American-Pronunciation Internationalist High Tech Latinate English. Dictionary authority. This list, by virtue of its dictionary link, has far more authority than a conventional professional-subject glossary, even the one offered online by the University of Maryland Medical Center. American dictionaries, after all, have always assigned their technical terms to professional experts in specific fields, identified those experts in print, and in effect held them responsible for the accuracy and comprehensiveness of each entry. Even more important, the entries themselves offer learners a complete sketch of each target word (headword). Memorization. For professionals, memorization is a basic career requirement. Any physician will tell you how much of it is called for in medical school and how hard it is, thanks to thousands of strange, exotic shapes like <myocardium> that have to be taken apart in the mind and reassembled like pieces of an unpronounceable jigsaw puzzle. -
SC11-1611 Appendix to Amici Curiae Brief (American Tort Reform
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC11-1611 L.T. No.: 1D10-2820 __________________________________________________________________ AMANDA JEAN HALL, PETITIONER, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, RESPONDENT. __________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX TO BRIEF OF THE AMERICAN TORT REFORM ASSOCIATION AND THE FLORIDA JUSTICE REFORM INSTITUTE AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT __________________________________________________________________ On Discretionary Review from a Decision of the First District Court of Appeal of Florida __________________________________________________________________ George N. Meros, Jr. Florida Bar No. 263321 Charles Burns Upton II Florida Bar No. 0037241 GrayRobinson, P.A. Post Office Box 11189 Tallahassee, Florida 32302-3189 Telephone: 850-577-9090 Facsimile: 850-577-3311 Email: [email protected] [email protected] INDEX TO APPENDIX Page SUMMARY OF LEGISLATION AND COURT RULES LIMITING THE SIZE OF APPEAL BONDS ................................................................. A-1 APPENDIX SUMMARY OF LEGISLATION AND COURT RULES LIMITING THE SIZE OF APPEAL BONDS Jurisdictions That Have Not Adopted Legislation Or Court Rules Limiting The Size Of Appeal Bonds Alaska Maryland Delaware Montana District of Columbia New York Illinois Enacted Or Adopted Appeal Bond Legislation Or Court Rules State Statute / Date To Whom Limits Amount of Appeal Scope of Appeal Bond Rule / Bill Approved Apply Bond Limit Limit Alabama Ala. Code § 6- 2/24/2006 Master Settlement $125,000,000 Applies to civil litigation 12-4 Agreement under any legal theory. signatories, successors, and affiliates Arizona Ariz. Code § 4/13/2011 All litigants The lesser of the Applies to all judgments 12-2108 total amount of in a civil action under created by damages any legal theory. S.B. 1212 (excluding punitive damages), 50% of the defendant’s net worth, or $25,000,000 Arkansas Ark Code 3/27/2003 All litigants $25,000,000 Applies to all judgments § 16-55-214 3/30/2005 in civil litigation amended by regardless of legal S.B. -
THE PRISM Volume 4, Issue 4 July 2014
Central Valley Chapter - California Land Surveyors Association www.californiacentralvalleysurveyors.org Central Valley Chapter THE PRISM Volume 4, Issue 4 July 2014 2014 Chapter Officers Up President: Kevin Genasci Coming Date: July 23, 2014 Vice President: Landon Blake Meetings! Time: 6:00 p.m. Secretary: Rich Brown Treasurer: Tom Price Location: Perko’s @ 901 North Carpenter Road, Modesto Chapter Rep: Keith Spencer Speaker: Rob McMillan, PLS, E.I.T. - CalTrans Chapter Rep: Bill Koch Topic: 3D Mobile Scanning: The Bay Bridge Alt. Chapter Rep: Landon Blake Alt. Chapter Rep: Kevin Genasci 2014 Chapter Committees Date: August 27, 2014 By-Laws Committee: Time: 6:00 p.m. Keith Spencer (Chairman) Location: Perko’s @ 901 North Carpenter Road, Modesto Construction Committee: Landon Blake (Chairman) Speaker: TBA Education Committee: Topic: TBA Kevin Genasci (Chairman) Membership Committee: Keith Spencer (Chairman) Monument Preservation Committee: Mike Quartaroli (Chairman) Announcements Newsletter: Fresno State University announces Rich Brown (Editor) It’s 54th Annual Geomatics Engineering Conference is February 20 & 21, 2015 in Professional Practices Committee: Mike Quartaroli (Chairman) Clovis. Contact Marco Castaneda at [email protected] for more in- San Joaquin County Liaison Committee: formation. Kevin Genasci (Chairman) CLSA/NALS Annual Conference Stanislaus County Liaison Committee: Rich Fultz (Chairman) Is set for March 21-25, 2015, at the Silver Legacy Resort and Casino in Reno, Nevada Website: Check State CLSA for more information Keith Spencer (Web Master) NCEES 2014 PS Exam is set for October 24, 2014 2014 Chapter Programs Registration for the October PS Exam will be open from June 16, and closes at 3:00 Boy Scout Merit Badge: p.m. -
Deed Research Georgia Department of Revenue
Georgia Department of Revenue The statutory materials reprinted or quoted verbatim on the following pages are taken from the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Copyright 2016 by the State of Georgia, and are reprinted with the permission of the State of Georgia. Unless otherwise provided, all information reprinted or quoted are taken from the sources listed on the reference page which can be located at the back of the book. All references are reprinted with permission for instructional purposes only. All rights reserved. For Educational Purposes Only: The material within is intended to give the course participant a solid understanding of general principles in the subject area. As such, the material may not necessarily reflect the official procedures and policies of the Georgia Department of Revenue or the Department’s official interpretation of the laws of the State of Georgia. The application of applicability to specific situations of the theories, techniques, and approaches discussed herein must be determined on a case-by-case basis. Revised February 2021 1 Deed Research Georgia Department of Revenue This page left blank intentionally. 2 Deed Research Georgia Department of Revenue Contents SECTION 1 OVERVIEW OF AD VALOREM TAXATION ............................................................................................... 10 THE TAX BILL .......................................................................................................................................................... 16 THE MASS APPRAISAL PROCESS ....................................................................................Error! -
Deed DE Sussex James Tamplin Thomas Tamplin 1773
Deed, DE, Sussex, JAMES TAMPLIN to THOMAS TAMPLIN 1773 THOMAS TAMPLIN to JAMES TAMPLIN This indenture made the third day of August in the year of Our Lord 1773 between JAMES TAMPLIN of the county of Sussex on Delaware of the one part and THOMAS TAMPLIN of the county of for said of the other part. WITNESSES that whereas there is a certain tract of land situate lying and being in the Indian River hundred and County aforesaid granted by a proprietors warrant to a certain THOMAS BRYAN late of ye county aforesaid, deceased, who by his deed of sale duly executed under his hand and seal conveyed it to WILLIAM BLIZARD and the said WILLIAM BLIZARD conveyed the said tract of land to EZEKIEL JACKSON and you said is EZEKIEL JACKSON by his writing obligatory under his hand and seal obliged him self to convey it to RICHARD TAMPLIN but he, the said RICHARD, dying before conveyance was made the said EZEKIEL JACKSON conveyed it to the heirs of the said RICHARD TAMPLIN and ye aforesaid JAMES TAMPLIN elder sons of the said RICHARD TAMPLIN, deceased, proffered a petition to the orphans court for the county of for said praying you said Court to a point five freeholders to if I divide the said land among the several heirs of the aforesaid RICHARD TAMPLIN, which petition the court was pleased to grant, and the said freeholders, after going to the land made return to ye said court that ye said land would not bear dividing among the several heirs of the said RICHARD TAMPLIN agreeable to ye said directions of an act of assembly in such case made and provided without spoiling and marring the whole.