WHANGAMATA COMMUNITY PLAN our future
2001
g hese lead out hese lead out Page 2 29 May 2002 – version 4 2002 – May Page 2 29 d is also recognised as bein
a a t t surfing breaks, yet safest swimming in New surfing breaks, a a s. Short trails ours that lie to the north and south. T m m ion for Whangamata supported by the participants a a g g n n pproximately 4-5,000 residents), an ing old mining site mining old ing a a h h W W
and recreational fishing. t t om civilisation. om
u u o o st bordering the town provide many outdoor outdoor many town provide the st bordering Board and Council, the direct cean beach which provides some of the best best the of some cean beach which provides along its 4 km length or in the safe harb safe the in or length 4 km its along b b
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are A Surfing Mecca of New Zealand A t growing towns in New Zealand (a ed beaches away fr ed beaches walks, mountain bike trails, and explor bike trails, mountain walks, c Ocean popular for big game big for c Ocean popular This plan outlines, for the Community at the community forums. from forestry roads lead to isolat from forestry roads lead experiences including short to a section of the Pacifi Park and Tairua Fore The Coromandel Forest Whangamata is one of the fastes among the most popular beach resorts. Whangamata is famous for its spectacular o Zealand. Sea conditions suitable for all are available within this document costs Note: All estimated the the g ned to to ned in g g eneration has an eneration has an ples and values values ples and g amata is part of, g Page 3 29 May 2002 – version 4 2002 – May Page 3 29
amata’s character and n n g
w w o o T T - - Sustainable eco management requires a eco management requires a Sustainable close interaction with our natural environment. By carefully mana ecosystem that Whan we will ensure the next environment of no less quality than the enjoys. current generation The community princi are desi outlined in this plan ensure Whan environment are protected and rejuvenated. o o c c
E E
n n A A
- -
a a t t a a m m a a environmentally sustainable economically viable socially responsible g g
• • • n n are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are a a h h W W
within this document costs Note: All estimated Page 4 29 May 2002 – version 4 2002 – May Page 4 29 mmitment to ensure
is in balance with nature. with nature. in balance is s s ad to better decisions. to better ad by the community. e e u u use they have the co l l a a V V walks, and appropriate land use. walks, and appropriate value will be respected and protected. will be value
information held held information d d in the community will le in the community with Ngati Puu is essential for implementing the plan. the essential for implementing Ngati Puu is with n n the “beachy/bachy” spirit of Whangamata - “Te wairua o to wairua o to - “Te of Whangamata the “beachy/bachy” spirit ound in which human activity a a
s s n n o o i i s s i i
th naturally functioning dunes and bar. functioning dunes and naturally th V Special interest groups are important beca taken. actions are appropriate V l backdrop including forests, bush l backdrop including forests, bush d town limits to avoid urban sprawl. urban avoid to limits d town
in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are
Community participation is essential. An active working relationship sites of historic and other Waahi tapu It is important to use the wealth of use the to important It is knowledge Diverse and varied
tive and vibrant place for people. tive Values logically healthy, sandy playgr logically healthy, The harbour will be a clean, eco will be a The harbour The beach will be clean and accessible, wi clean and accessible, The beach will be will be an attrac The town centre define be within will Any development The harbour will have a stable, natura will have The harbour Vistas of hills, harbour and beach will be protected to maintain and beach will be protected Vistas of hills, harbour tatoa Papakainga”.
Visions within this document costs Note: All estimated h g amata g plan has established a has established plan and values outlined in the community and Page 5 29 May 2002 – version 4 2002 – May Page 5 29 ement for Whan g
n n o o
i i t from identification of the issues, throu t g a a he process to develop this he process to develop Sustainable mana Sustainable to community requires a new approach levels in decision at all Participation participation. makin monitoring. to development of options, T new relationship between authorities. The community principles relationship to continue and this this plan require grow. p p i i c c i i
t t r r e area is essential to achieve the best results.
a a
forum P P tions
Authorities Adopt p Submissions and/or
O Develop Develop y y t t i i
n n OPTION
u Consult on u the options ISSUE m m Recommendation Proposed HE
SELECT AN IDENTIFY IDENTIFY T m m in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are
o o CYCLE C C
COMMUNITY
PARTICIPATION
BY REVIEW MONITOR & AUTHORITIES AUTHORITIES
IMPLEMENTATION
m
Principle: Community participation in managing th within this document costs Note: All estimated
Community participation
roups is important important roups is g ement of voluntary voluntary ement of g Page 6 29 May 2002 – version 4 2002 – May Page 6 29 Ngati Puu Grey Power Clean Water Whangamata Beach Care Harbour Care Wentworth River Care Komate Maori
Involvement and Involvement acknowled community for Whangamata: • • • • • • • $10,000 pa. $2 per ratepayer/ pa. $8,000 pa. $2 per ratepayer/ pa. $15000 pa plus capital cost. $3 per ratepayer/ pa. $5000 pa. Water Care Group, Water Care Group, Board. Community EW, TCDC, Community TCDC, EW, Board. TCDC, EW. EW. TCDC, Community TCDC, EW. Board. ll decision making processes for Whangamata. ll decision making processes
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are August – to be involved in development of Strategic Annual Plan – issues. February – to review past year Overview.
Short term and ongoing. Short term TCDC, EW, Short term. Short term. TCDC. $20,000 plus. 1. 2. Participate in and present a and present Participate in the Community at section Forum. issues based based issues plan feedback on implementation information includes local up to date monitoring plan.
A community water care group group water care A community and resourced to be endorsed be to by the authorities involved in ongoing issues regarding water management. existing care Approach the of on a role take groups to implementation overview and the of sections for the relevant plan.
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost estimates Cost To ensure community participation in a Goal: Responsibilities Actions Timeframes and Two public participation per sharing forums information year. to be website An interactive developed to promote community involvement: • • • • within this document costs Note: All estimated
Page 7 29 May 2002 – version 4 2002 – May Page 7 29 immediately to two years immediately to two years three to five years six to ten years he quality demanded from the demanded from the he quality the used for he timeframes
T be achieved. must visions Timeframes T plan are: Short term • Medium term • Long term • $10000 pa. $2 per ratepayer per year. $10,000 pa. $2 per ratepayer pa. Ngati Puu, Water Care Groups, Community Board. EW, TCDC, Community monitoring group, Community Board. ty involvement in the monitoring process.
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are Short term EW, TCDC, Community, Monitoring programme Decemberagreed by 2001. involves the community,and; are ensures the visions being achieved; includes a response adverse mechanism for events; includes a comprehensive harbour monitoring mitigation programme and for adverse events.
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost estimates Cost Responsibilities To provide opportunities for communi Goal: Actions Timeframes That the community, assisted by EW, as a basis for a comprehensive monitoring programme develops the conceptual ecosystem model Whangamata. for Develop a monitoring and review programme that integrates the statutory and community monitoring proceesses and: within this document costs Note: All estimated y and g uidelines uidelines
g uided by the by uided g Page 8 29 May 2002 – version 4 2002 – May Page 8 29 Integration Integration Zero waste and natural Based on the water cycle. he water strate
T best practice must be three principles of an eco system approach: • • • by using an eco-system stems is responsive to community wishes. stems is responsive ROC $5,000 to $30,000 plus depending on changes required to of Council Code Practice for subdivision and development. How? District Plan How? District $50,000 variation ROC (Rough Order ROC (Rough – Cost) $35,000 note, no current direct or indirect link -stormwater and supply town water ality and achieve social benefit. ality and achieve
r r e e t t gamata are kept healthy and operated to contribute the community visions. a a , waste and storm water as an integrated system. W W EW, Water Care Group EW, Water Care Water Care Group Water Care Group EW, Water Care Group EW, Water Care e not privatised, and management of the sy of the management and privatised, e not
term costs, enhance environmental qu in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are Short term and ongoing Short term Board TCDC, Community Short Term. TCDC, EW Short term Short Board, TCDC, Community approach to manage drinking The preference is that all water assets ar This principle aims to reduce long Council infrastructure Subdivision development; Commercial and household; use. Water provision;
in that it is updated with new updated with new in that it is developments. technological Practice Guidelines for water, for Practice Guidelines to and stormwater wastewater guide: the council a policy of as To develop a water cycle water cycle a To develop strategy for integrated ecosystem management of drinking water and wastewater, with linked stormwater, incremental improvements. This must be a living document a living document be This must •
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost Estimates PRINCIPLE: To ensure all the waters of Whan • Cost WATER MANAGEMENT Responsibilities GOAL: To ensure the water systems are designed, built, Actions Timeframes Develop Whangamata Best • • • • adopted strategy be Water cycle within this document costs Note: All estimated Page 9 29 May 2002 – version 4 2002 – May Page 9 29 amata residents g Whan want solutions that are cost effective and well researched. ROC survey individual ROC survey individual properties within follow and township up letter $250,000. Rough Order Cost Rough Order $20,000 balance $50,000. balance $50,000.
Water Care Group Water Care Group Community Board plus.
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are Short term. Short term. Board TCDC, Community mass ROC survey Medium term. Medium term. Board TCDC, Community promoting water and waste ;efficient technologies systems pricing/rating subsidies water meters options. polluter pays
investigate the options for options investigate the and/or creating subsidising incentives to minimise water This production. waste use and will include options for: the of current leakage from all introduce leak then systems, detection programmes. consideration fluctuating consideration and mix match populations of options. planning systems. Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost Estimates Cost Responsibilities Actions Timeframes study to An economic • • • • amount TCDC to investigate the The study to take into within this document costs Note: All estimated Page 10 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 10 29 he visions need numerical he visions T them. support standards to and effect. With indirect to effects difficult determine cause and effect. costs Monitoring significant. will be Cannot price on info to hand.
Estimates will be managed to protect the wairua (spirit) of Board, Community Board, Community Water monitoring group, Care. EW, Whangamata Whangamata EW, Water Care, community, River Care.
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are Short term and ongoing. Short term EW, TCDC, Community Short term start. start. Short term fulfillment. Medium term estuaries and restore the health of ecosystems. to work Waikato Environment and further with the community develop a Whangamata which will become Standards (to plan part of a statutory nutrient include estuary research). take will consent The resource direct the full into consideration effects and indirect ecological of the activity.
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost GOAL: To ensure discharges to the waters of Whangamata Responsibilities Actions Timeframes within this document costs Note: All estimated h level h level g
e person uses the s per person each s per g g Page 11 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 11 29 benefits of ecologically benefits of ecologically High level 11 litres litres Low level 5.5 Avera per day times toilet 5 per day = 33 litres Savin litres day = 22 22 litres x by 365 days 4,500 people =36,135,000 litres of water saved All high level = 55 litres All high level = 55 litres 4 low level + 1 hi
Dual flush toilet • • • • • • • ROC $5,000 to ROC $5,000 $25,000 depending link to on programme other programmes. $10,000. Cost as per other as per other Cost and education stuff, promotion link would programmes. to ROC $5,000 $25,000 depending link to on programme other programmes.
ch will result in better water management. a sound understanding of the Water Care Groups. Water Care Groups. Water Care Groups. Water Care Groups. Water Care Groups.
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are Short term and ongoing. Short term Board TCDC, Community Short term and ongoing. Short term Board TCDC ,Community and ongoing. Short term Board, TCDC, Community and ongoing. Short term Board. TCDC, Community ROC $5,000 to actions in their day to activities whi sustainable public ongoing Launch an campaign. awareness water about public Educate and best practice cycle strategy guidelines. about informed Keep public progress. eco into programmes Education – to water problems response dual- showerheads, “gizmos”, grey recycle flushing toilets, lift cut of lawn mower. water, Develop a communication time strategy in regard to peak controls.
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost Estimates Cost WATER EDUCATION GOAL: To ensure ratepayers, residents and tourists have Responsibilities Actions Timeframes within this document costs Note: All estimated Page 12 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 12 29 on-site infiltration infiltration on-site systems larger storage guttering swales paving porous
Examples of on site storm water control:
ROC $17,000 ROC $17,000 inspection annual only and letter follow up – no physical works. ROC $25,000 one ROC $25,000 off – preparation wide of District bylaw on entry stormwater contamination controls. ROC physical ROC physical works difficult without investigation, to Range $50,000 $200,000
on investigation on investigation and houses. sumps on ROC $5,000 based investigation sumps. Investigation required may mean retention – some pond all sites areas and sites (commercial) impossible. Cannot but will cost estimate
Board.
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are Short term and ongoing. and Short term Board. TCDC, Community Based ROC $10,000 Short term and ongoing. Short term TCDC, Community Investigating options for Investigating options at to contamination solutions all entry points; Implementing preferred of entry for point options control; of Implementing control of at points contamination entry.
Employ point of entry control of entry control Employ point by: All new buildings and developments be required to site retention and on maximise water. of storm slow release
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost Estimates Cost STORM WATER Responsibilities GOAL: To minimise volume run off and pollutants entering the storm water system. Actions Timeframes within this document costs Note: All estimated Page 13 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 13 29 Quantity ROC Quantity ROC $50,000. Location ROC ROC Location $10,000. ROC Quality $50,000.
be significant. ROC $30,000 plan. ROC $30,000 unable Actual works will to estimate, but be significant. Without investigation cannot be estimated but will be significant.
Board, EW.Board, EW,Board, Water Care Groups. Board.
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are Short term start. start. Short term Short term. TCDC, Community TCDC, Community Short term and ongoing. Short term TCDC, Community eradicating illegal connections any stopping current contamination of storm water systems.
Produce long term plan for Produce long the consider to stormwater on the of global warming effects system. entering storm Prevent waste by: water systems and maintain a TCDC to produce - storm water record complete waterflow content. ie location,
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost Estimates Cost Responsibilities Actions Timeframes within this document costs Note: All estimated Page 14 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 14 29 People will be able to swim in the harbour ill. getting without Without groups terms terms Without groups of reference cannot be costed. Cannot estimate until known. likely solution to ROC $10,000 $30,000. To be costed. Without investigation cost cannot estimate but would be significant. ensure no pollutants enter the waters of Whangamata. TCDC, Community TCDC, Community EW,Board, Water Care Group Community. TCDC, Community EW.Board, Community Board, EW Water Care Group. Board, EW.
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are Short term and ongoing. Short term term and Medium and long ongoing. and ongoing. Short term Board TCDC, Community Short term and ongoing. Short term TCDC, Community To minimise the load to wastewater system and
To minimise storm water To minimise water the waste infiltration to system. group Delegate the watercare different to investigate authority for wastewater options disposal. and treatment the long- TCDC to implement treatment to water term solution when decided and disposal upon. on-site for Develop standards wastewater and satellite Health with NZ in line systems and Building guidelines.
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost Estimates Cost Waste Water Responsibilities GOAL: Actions Timeframes within this document costs Note: All estimated allons allons g
1 drop per second equals 360 per year.
Leaking Tap • Page 15 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 15 29 Leak detection survey each property ROC $250,000. Education programme ROC $5,000 to $25,000. Onsite water storage, link Onsite water ROC $5,000 to programmes $25,000.
ROC $75,00. ROC $75,00. known. Without group terms of reference this this terms of reference Without group cannot be costed. ROC $5,000 to $25,000 depending on programmes. to other programme link
and of the highest quality. CDC, Community CDC, Community Board. TCDC, EW, Water Water TCDC, EW, Care Group. TCDC, Community Board, Water Care Community. Groups, TCDC, Water Care Groups, Community Board. T quantity
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are Short term. Short term. term. Medium to long TCDC, EW. and Short term ongoing. Cannot estimate until preferred option and Short term ongoing. and Short term ongoing. To provide water in sustainable : Delegate the Water Care Group the Water Care Delegate different to investigate authority providing the for options with pure drinking community of a very high quality, water Whangamata a and develop with consultation Standard in technical advisers. the TCDC to implement preferred option when decided upon. to a system TCDC to introduce taps throughout check leaking include - to area the residential programme and education to mechanism appropriate tap washers. check and fix of TCDC to investigate the cost the change of subsidising water to existing facilities dual - eg, methods conservation showerheads, flushing toilets, etc. the promote TCDC to of devices in new installation water developments to minimise flushing toilets, dual - ie use etc. shower heads, guttering,
Actions Timeframes ResponsibilitiesCost Estimates ResponsibilitiesCostDRINKING WATER GOAL Actions Timeframes within this document costs Note: All estimated Page 16 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 16 29 lfish and plants ensure Pollutants from human from human Pollutants activity, harvest, over-use, and competition for space all put pressure on the harbour.
h h c c a a e e B B
d d our including birds, fish, shel n n a a fidence from productive and accessible beds.
r r u u o o iness of the harbour, beach and b b r r a a H H in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are Ongoing. Short term. Ngati Puu. Mfish, EW. User pays. cost. Regional shellfish (kaimoana) beds is most important. shellfish (kaimoana) beds is most important. No development should threaten this. people will be able to harvest kaimoana with con Educate on and enforce fishing on Educate laws. water quality Review harbour enforce them. and standards
estimates Principle: The health and cleanl Cost Goal: To protect a range of diverse, healthy life in the harb Responsibilities Actions Timeframes within this document costs Note: All estimated Page 17 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 17 29 Rubbish facilities are Rubbish facilities plentiful and accessible $10,000 plus ongoing maintenance $10,000 estimated pa. $2 per ratepayer. $10,000 plus ongoing $10,000 plus cost. n and free from rubbish and has the dunes covered with ntified areas, but kept out of areas where other ecosystem Board, EW.Board, Beachcare group, Ngati Pu, group, Ngati Pu, Beachcare Board , TCDC, Community EW.
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are Plan developed and fed back Plan developed process. into the forum Short term, ongoing. Short term, TCDC, Community term. Short to medium EW. Long term. $30,000. TCDC. EW, cost. Regional healthy sand-binding plants and crossed by accessways. values and uses would be adversely affected by their presence. Dune management Dune management Bar The Whangamata Stormwater Access Hazard Plan Rubbish management.
Get consent to enable residents enable residents to Get consent seedlings that can to remove be pulled by hand from identified area. and – regional Research – the role of scale national and nutrient sedimentation in mangrove hydraulic action expansion. Regional Coastal Plan. Review Care Plan Prepare a Beach with to assist using the forum To include among consultation. other things: • • • • • •
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost estimates Cost Goal: To plan how mangroves will be protected in ide Responsibilities Actions Timeframes estimates Cost Goal: Responsibilities To provide a beach environment that will be clea Actions Timeframes within this document costs Note: All estimated s to g ht and ht and g the hei g Page 18 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 18 29 amata so attractive by amata so attractive in g g Protect the vistas of hills and ocean that make Whan mana location of buildin and openness maintain views.
t t
n n e e m m p p o o $3000. of Depends on level enforcement. Plan change costs appeals $30,000 plus Court. to Environment Nil, policy issue. Nil, policy issues. cost. Other economic Cost estimates l l e e storey development to protect the “beachy” casual storey development to protect the “beachy” casual v v e e D D
d d n n a a Community Board, EW. Board. TCDC, Community Board. Board. Board.
will reflect the community visions. h h t t w w o o r r G
G in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are Short term. Short term. Short term. TCDC, Ngait Puu, term. medium Short to TCDC, Community Immediately. TCDC, Community Short term. Short term. TCDC, Community To ensure developers pay a fair share for entry to services based on all costs. To balance development with limits on infill and multi- atmosphere.
To develop a protocol for a To develop Whenua participation Tangata consideration. in consent in District Current standards Plan are enforced. to deviate Minimise discretion from standards. density Plan Adjust the District community rules to reflect principles. an pay New developments all costs. entry fee covering
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost estimates development and Cost Principle: Growth Goal: Responsibilities Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Goal: Actions Timeframes within this document costs Note: All estimated
g more g the landscape, g in Page 19 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 19 29 g Growth and development threatens the visions by chan blocking views, increasin and puttin pollution, pressure on recreational resources. Nil initial cost, other Nil initial cost, other costs. economic $10,000 per ratepayer $2 per ratepayer /pa. tructure is ahead of growth through good planning. Board. Board.
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are Immediately. TCDC, Community TCDC, Community Stop new connections until until Stop new connections WWTP upgrade completed. practice guidelines Develop best and energy. waste, on water,
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost estimates Cost Responsibilities Goal: To ensure the provision of appropriate infras Actions Timeframes within this document costs Note: All estimated $50,000 pa $10 per ratepayer/ pa Page 20 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 20 29
e e r r t t n n e e Public consultation to set priorities, develop priorities, develop Public consultation to set and detailed design. strategy implementation C C
n n w w o o T T TCDC, Community TCDC, Community Board.
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are To be determined. To be determined. Undertake public consultation Undertake public consultation an and develop to set priorities and strategy implementation detailed design.
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost estimates Cost Principle: The town centre will be an attractive and vibrant place. Responsibilities To discuss and approve the town centre project undertaken in 1997. Goal: Actions Timeframes within this document costs Note: All estimated Page 21 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 21 29
Maintain Riparian margins margins Maintain Riparian where appropriate.
n n o o i i t t a a e e $10000 pa. Nil, policy issue. $2000 pa. Cost estimates r r c c e e R R
Community d d n n
a a
Board, Ngati Puu. Board in co-operation Board in co-operation with Ngati Puu.
Board. e e r r u u amenities to meet community needs. s s i i e e L L
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are activities will be available in properly managed areas. 2001. EW, TCDC, 2001. EW, Medium term. Medium term. TCDC, Community Long term. Long term. TCDC, Community play area for children water sports boating etc.
Develop reserve management management Develop reserve all reserves. plans for Progressively uptake esplanade reserve option.
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost estimates Cost Principle: A diverse range of To ensure public access will be provided around the harbour margins. Goal: Responsibilities Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Goal: To provide appropriate recreational Actions Timeframes Establish and define selected areas for water activities: • • • • Refer Navigational safety by- laws. within this document costs Note: All estimated :
Page 22 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 22 29 Entertainment centre/ sound shell Open space and gardens Footpaths Sports and recreation centre Shade trees Library Dump/recycling facility Market place Street lighting Beach accessways Bar The Whangamata Camping ground Wharf/slipway Seating Toilets Art gallery/museum Car parks
Facilities identified as desirable desirable Facilities identified as for Whangamata $5000 - $10,000. dredge $40,000 per $4 per ratepayer per dredge. EW. $20,000. Board, EW. Board Community reports to EW.
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are Once the decision regarding regarding Once the decision finalised. a marina is From 1 July. EW. Before December 2001. TCDC, Community TCDC, Ngati Puu, pays. User quantity location type quantity location allocation mechanism.
Control of boat effluent Control on the wharf. pump out facility of bylaws,and Enforcement bylaws navigation discharge rules. A mooring review is undertaken needs: to assess future • • Review dredging, for the Develop a protocol placement of dredging. Pre and post-dredging sampling, to determine quantities; shellfish: content; sediment condition; location; types; etc.
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost estimates Cost Responsibilities Goal: To ensure activities on and in the harbour will be appropriately managed. Actions Timeframes within this document costs Note: All estimated
Page 23 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 23 29 Waahi Tapu and other sites are value of historic respected and protected.
t t n n e e m m rse environmental effects. e e g $60,000 to upgrade $60,000 to upgrade existing fences? Estimated capital cost capital Estimated with of $160,000 annual $80,000 maintenance. g conditions of lease. of conditions
a a n n a a M M
t t n Ngati Puu. Ngati Puu. Approximately n e e DoC, Ngati Puu, CHH on Costs dependant EW, DoC, CHH and other EW, DoC, land owners. m m h h c c t t a a gement will minimise any adve will be cared for and will extend to cover the western face of peninsula. C C the catchment from harmful effects. in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are Negotiations completed Negotiations in at next time for a handover 25 harvest (approximately years). Restoration of native take will vegetation 20 another approximately years. By December 2001 EW $3,000 After final harvest. DoC, Starts in 2002-03 financial financial Starts in 2002-03 year. Ongoing maintenance.
vegetation
Carry out feasibility study of Carry out feasibility study options. pest management animal Design and implement programme. pest control proof fence a pest Construct the across the northern end of Peninsula.
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost estimates Cost Principle: Catchment mana Goal: To ensure native Responsibilities Actions Timeframes of a return Negotiate commercially forested land on to DoC the Peninsula - standards management subject to Treaty claims. Goal: To protect riparian area of within this document costs Note: All estimated acent j ed to g Page 24 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 24 29 Streams and ad land are mana protect the harbour from pollutants. from CHH. Costs depend on level of compliance. Currently spending pa. about $13,000
Wentworth Rivercare Wentworth Rivercare group with financial and support from EW TCDC. TCDC and EW. $10,000.
are at 2001 costs and may change in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are catchment will minimise erosion. Already underway. Another 3-5 yearsto complete. group(s) during Form landcare 2002. Begin a five year programme of 2002- summer of work in 03. Check timetable with CHH. EW. Full cost recovery Ongoing. EW. Ongoing. EW.
Continue to fence and plant all Continue to fence banks in the farmed stream Wentworth Valley. all farmed Fence and plant in other stream banks catchments. Enforce the riparian of the aspects management Regional Coastal Plan. Monitor forest harvest activities conditions. consent and enforce
Actions Timeframes Responsibilities Cost estimates Cost Responsibilities Actions Timeframes estimates Cost Responsibilities Goal: To ensure land use in the Actions Timeframes within this document costs Note: All estimated Page 25 29 May 2002 – version 4 version May 2002 – Page 25 29 in the preparation of this Plan
s s t t who attended forums and participated n n in the future. and may change at 2001 costs are e e m m e e g g d d e e l l w w o o n n k k Environment Waikato Ngati Pu Thames-Coromandel District Council The people of Whangamata people The
c c http://tour.thepeninsula.co.nz/index_thepeninsula.htm
A • Photos accessed from: • •
A within this document costs Note: All estimated