Rectal Corticosteroids Versus Alternative Treatments in Ulcerative Colitis: a Meta-Analysis Gut: First Published As 10.1136/Gut.40.6.775 on 1 June 1997

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rectal Corticosteroids Versus Alternative Treatments in Ulcerative Colitis: a Meta-Analysis Gut: First Published As 10.1136/Gut.40.6.775 on 1 June 1997 Gut 1997; 40: 775-781 775 Rectal corticosteroids versus alternative treatments in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.40.6.775 on 1 June 1997. Downloaded from J K Marshall, E J Irvine Abstract medication consistently to the splenic Background-Clear strategies to optimise flexure,49 and a larger volume seems to allow the use of corticosteroids in ulcerative more proximal delivery.10 11 Rectal foam dis- colitis are lacking. seminates medication to the rectum and distal Aim-A meta-analysis was undertaken to descending colon,'2-16 whereas suppositories examine critically the role of rectal corti- coat only the rectum.'7 18 costeroids in the management of active Although studies of rectally administered distal ulcerative colitis. corticosteroids have reported fewer systemic Methods-AJl reported randomised con- adverse effects than with oral preparations, trolled trials were retrieved by searching plasma concentrations of prednisolone were the Medline and EMBASE databases and similar after administration of identical oral or the bibliographies of relevant studies. rectal doses.'9 20 Suppression of the hypo- Trials which met inclusion criteria were thalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in association assessed for scientific rigour. Data were with rectal therapy has also been shown.2' 26 extracted by two independent observers Newer topically active corticosteroids such according to predetermined criteria. as tixocortol, beclomethasone, prednisolone Results-Of 83 trials retrieved, 33 met metasulphabenzoate, and budesonide, with inclusion criteria. Pooled odds ratios restricted absorption or rapid hepatic metab- (POR) showed conventional rectal corti- olism have been developed to reduce the costeroids and rectal budesonide to be adverse effects associated with conventional clearly superior to placebo. In seven trials, corticosteroids.27 28 rectal 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) was To examine critically the role of rectal corti- significantly better than conventional costeroids in the treatment of active distal rectal corticosteroids for inducing re- ulcerative colitis, we performed a meta-analysis mission of symptoms, endoscopy, and of all reported randomised controlled trials. histology with POR of 2-42 (95% confi- http://gut.bmj.com/ dence interval (CI) 1-72-3-41), 1.89 (95% CI 1.29-2*76), and 2*03 (95% CI 1.28-3*20), Methods respectively. Rectal budesonide was of Relevant clinical trials were identified by comparable efficacy to conventional corti- searching the Medline database from 1966 to costeroids but produced less endogenous 1996 and the EMBASE database from 1985 to cortisol suppression. Side effects, 1996, using the MeSH terms "inflammatory although inconsistently reported, were bowel disease", "therapy", and "topical ad- on September 23, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. generally minor. A cost comparison of ministration", "enema", or "suppository". rectal preparations showed 5-ASA to be Bibliographies of all relevant studies and recent less expensive than corticosteroids. review articles were scanned to identify further Conclusions-Rectal 5-ASA is superior to citations. Each paper was assessed by two rectal corticosteroids in the management independent observers (JKM, EJI) according ofdistal ulcerative colitis. to predetermined inclusion criteria. Studies (Gut 1997; 40: 775-781) were accepted if patients had active ulcerative colitis with a documented disease margin distal Keywords: ulcerative colitis, corticosteroids, therapy, to the splenic flexure on radiographic studies topical administration, enema, suppository. or less than 60 cm from the anal verge at flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. We required that patients had been randomly Oral corticosteroids have been a well-accepted assigned to two or more treatment groups, with treatment for active ulcerative colitis since rectal corticosteroids in at least one treatment Division of Gastroenterology and Truelove et al reported the efficacy of oral arm and a symptom score as one of the main Intestinal Disease hydrocortisone over 40 years ago.' However, outcome criteria. The minimum duration of Research Programme, their long term use may be limited and patient therapy permitted was two weeks. McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, compliance diminished by potential adverse Trials which met the inclusion criteria were Canada effects. Administration of a corticosteroid then evaluated quantitatively for scientific J K Marshall liquid enema was first suggested to be effi- rigour using a 30 point scoring system.29 Dis- E J Irvine cacious in distal ulcerative colitis in 1956.2 The agreements in scoring between the two Correspondence to: Dr E Jan Irvine, proven efficacy of direct drug delivery to the observers were settled by consensus. Division of Gastroenterology, site of inflammation has since led to wide- Data were extracted from each report using Room 4W8, McMaster University Medical Center, spread acceptance of rectal corticosteroid a predefined format. Recorded data points 1200 Main Street West, therapy.3 included the number of patients enrolled, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada. The ability of a rectal preparation to achieve number completing the study, sex, and disease Accepted for publication a proximal distribution is determined by the distribution. The proportion of patients that 23 December 1996 type of vehicle. Liquid enemas can deliver improved or attained remission, or both, by 776 MarshaUl, Irvine symptomatic, endoscopic, and histological remission. When corticosteroid doses were criteria were recorded from each trial using an converted to their hydrocortisone equivalent,30 intention to treat principle. The dose, no dose response relation was observed for frequency, duration, and formulation (enema, either conventional or topical formulations. suppository or foam) of treatments were noted, Similarly, no correlation was apparent between Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.40.6.775 on 1 June 1997. Downloaded from as were any reported adverse effects of therapy. duration of treatment and response rate. We anticipated that the definitions of Aminosalicylates (4-ASA or 5-ASA), which "improvement" and "remission" would vary were used most frequently as a comparative considerably among the papers accepted. To treatment, produced improvement in symp- overcome the problems of standardising end- toms, endoscopy, and histology in, respect- points, provided that an adequate definition of ively, 81%, 75%, and 65% of patients. Re- improvement or remission was offered, the mission with these endpoints was induced in authors' criteria for these outcomes were 52%, 410%, and 32% of patients, respectively. respected. All clinical symptom scores Across four trials, 34% of patients taking included stool frequency and rectal bleeding. placebo improved symptomatically, and 38% Studies were grouped for analysis according improved endoscopically. Remission rates by to the type of corticosteroid and control symptomatic and endoscopic criteria were 9% therapies. Corticosteroid doses were also con- and 17%. verted to a hydrocortisone dose equivalent to permit testing for a dose response relation.30 The statistical analysis was conducted using the RECTAL CORTICOSTEROIDS VERSUS PLACEBO method of DerSimonian and Laird.3' An odds Two trials compared conventional rectal corti- ratio for each trial and a common odds ratio for costeroids with placebo.34 The combined each group with 95% confidence intervals (CI) results clearly favoured corticosteroids, with a were calculated according to Mantel-Haenszel. pooled odds ratios (POR) for symptomatic and Unless otherwise stated, odds ratios below 1 endoscopic improvement of 0-21 (95% CI favoured corticosteroid treatment, whereas 0-07-0-71) and 0-27 (95% CI 0-10-0-77), odds radios above 1 favoured the alternative respectively. The PORs for symptomatic and treatment. Continuous data points were pooled endoscopic remission were 0 07 (95% CI and compared using a weighted mean differ- 0-02-0-29) and 0 34 (95% CI 0-10-1-20), ence.32 Homogeneity within groups oftrials was respectively. Histological endpoints were not confirmed using the Breslow-Day test.33 Over- reported in these early trials. all response rates for each drug were calculated One trial reported that 2-3 mg budesonide by dividing the total number of patients enemas were superior to placebo for improve- reaching an endpoint by the total number of ment of symptoms, endoscopy, and his- http://gut.bmj.com/ patients treated. tology,36 whereas another found 2-0 mg or 8-0 mg daily superior to placebo in inducing com- bined symptomatic and endoscopic remission, Results with higher response rates at the larger dose.37 ACCEPTANCE AND VALIDITY SCORING In total, 83 relevant trials were identified by the RECTAL VERSUS ORAL CORTICOSTEROIDS on September 23, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. search, of which 33 met our inclusion criteria. Rectal hydrocortisone 100 mg was compared Reasons for excluding a trial included: lack of with oral prednisolone 60 mg daily in one trial randomisation (36 trials), inclusion of patients which showed oral treatment to be better for with disease proximal to the splenic flexure (29 symptomatic improvement and remission.39 A trials), lack of a predefined symptom score second trial compared low dose oral pred- (nine trials), duplicate reporting of data (three nisolone (7 5 mg daily) with rectal pred- trials), and inclusion of patients with Crohn's nisolone metasulphobenzoate 20 mg, and colitis (one trial). found rectal treatment to be more
Recommended publications
  • This Fact Sheet Provides Information to Patients with Eczema and Their Carers. About Topical Corticosteroids How to Apply Topic
    This fact sheet provides information to patients with eczema and their carers. About topical corticosteroids You or your child’s doctor has prescribed a topical corticosteroid for the treatment of eczema. For treating eczema, corticosteroids are usually prepared in a cream or ointment and are applied topically (directly onto the skin). Topical corticosteroids work by reducing inflammation and helping to control an over-reactive response of the immune system at the site of eczema. They also tighten blood vessels, making less blood flow to the surface of the skin. Together, these effects help to manage the symptoms of eczema. There is a range of steroids that can be used to treat eczema, each with different strengths (potencies). On the next page, the potencies of some common steroids are shown, as well as the concentration that they are usually used in cream or ointment preparations. Using a moisturiser along with a steroid cream does not reduce the effect of the steroid. There are many misconceptions about the side effects of topical corticosteroids. However these treatments are very safe and patients are encouraged to follow the treatment regimen as advised by their doctor. How to apply topical corticosteroids How often should I apply? How much should I apply? Apply 1–2 times each day to the affected area Enough cream should be used so that the of skin according to your doctor’s instructions. entire affected area is covered. The cream can then be rubbed or massaged into the Once the steroid cream has been applied, inflamed skin. moisturisers can be used straight away if needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Betamethasone
    Betamethasone Background Betamethasone is a potent, long-acting, synthetic glucocorticoid widely used in equine veterinary medicine as a steroidal anti-inflammatory.1 It is often administered intra-articularly for control of pain associated with inflammation and osteoarthritis.2 Betamethasone is a prescription medication and can only be dispensed from or upon the request of a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betamethasone#/media/File:Betamethasone veterinarian. It is commercially available .png in a variety of formulations including BetaVet™, BetaVet Soluspan Suspension® and Betasone Aqueous Suspension™.3 Betamethasone can be used intra-articularly, intramuscularly, by inhalation, and topically.4 When administered intra-articularly, it is often combined with other substances such as hyaluronan.5 Intra-articular and intramuscular dosages range widely based upon articular space, medication combination protocol, and practitioner preference. Betamethasone is a glucocorticoid receptor agonist which binds to various glucocorticoid receptors setting off a sequence of events affecting gene transcription and the synthesis of proteins. These mechanisms of action include: • Potential alteration of the G protein-coupled receptors to interfere with intracellular signal transduction pathways • Enhanced transcription in many genes, especially those involving suppression of inflammation. • Inhibition of gene transcription – including those that encode pro-inflammatory substances. The last two of these are considered genomic effects. This type of corticosteroid effect usually occurs within hours to days after administration. The genomic effects persist after the concentrations of the synthetic corticosteroid in plasma are no longer detectable, as evidenced by persistent suppression of the normal production of hydrocortisone following synthetic corticosteroid administration.6 When used judiciously, corticosteroids can be beneficial to the horse.
    [Show full text]
  • Rectal Suppository & Enema Administration to Administration Unlicensed Assistive Personnel (UAP) Module/Skill Checklist
    Delegation of Medication Rectal Suppository & Enema Administration to Administration Unlicensed Assistive Personnel (UAP) Module/Skill Checklist Objective At the completion of this module, the UAP should be able to administer rectal suppository & enema medications. NOTE: 1) The RN or LPN is permitted to delegate ONLY after application of all components of the NCBON Decision Tree for Delegation to UAP and after careful consideration that delegation is appropriate: a) for this client, b) with this acuity level, c) with this individual UAP’s knowledge and experience, and d) now (or in the time period being planned). 2) Successful completion of the “Infection Control” module by the UAP should be documented prior to instruction in medication administration by this or ANY route. Procedure for: SUPPOSITORY 1. Perform skills in General Medication Administration Checklist. 2. Provide privacy. Have client void before procedure. 3. Put on clean gloves. 4. Position the client on their left (preferred) side with the top leg bent slightly. 5. Remove the foil or wrapper from the suppository, if present. 6. Apply a small amount of lubricant to the suppository and your gloved index finger on your dominant hand – the hand holding the suppository. 7. Separate the buttocks with your gloved, non dominant hand. 8. Ask the client to breathe slowly and deeply through the mouth. 9. Place tip of suppository against anus and gently insert the suppository about 4- inches along the rectal wall. Avoid putting the suppository in stool. 10. After removing your finger, squeeze buttocks together for a few minutes to help client hold in the suppository for as long as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Antibacterial/Steroid Combination Therapy in Infected Eczema
    Acta Derm Venereol 2008; Suppl 216: 28–34 4. Antibacterial/steroid combination therapy in infected eczema Anthony C. CHU Infection with Staphylococcus aureus is common in all present, the use of anti-staphylococcal agents with top- forms of eczema. Production of superantigens by S. aureus ical corticosteroids has been shown to produce greater increases skin inflammation in eczema; antibacterial clinical improvement than topical corticosteroids alone treatment is thus pivotal. Poor patient compliance is a (6, 7). These findings are in keeping with the demon- major cause of treatment failure; combination prepara- stration that S. aureus can be isolated from more than tions that contain an antibacterial and a topical steroid 90% of atopic eczema skin lesions (8); in one study, it and that work quickly can improve compliance and thus was isolated from 100% of lesional skin and 79% of treatment outcome. Fusidic acid has advantages over normal skin in patients with atopic eczema (9). other available topical antibacterial agents – neomycin, We observed similar rates of infection in a prospective gentamicin, clioquinol, chlortetracycline, and the anti- audit at the Hammersmith Hospital, in which all new fungal agent miconazole. The clinical efficacy, antibac- patients referred with atopic eczema were evaluated. In terial activity and cosmetic acceptability of fusidic acid/ a 2-month period, 30 patients were referred (22 children corticosteroid combinations are similar to or better than and 8 adults). The reason given by the primary health those of comparator combinations. Fusidic acid/steroid physician for referral in 29 was failure to respond to combinations work quickly with observable improvement prescribed treatment, and one patient was referred be- within the first week.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Education
    CONSUMER EDUCATION Massachusetts General Laws Penalties for Possession or Possession with the Intent to Distribute • Consumers may not sell marijuana to any other individual • Marijuana is a class D controlled substance under the Massachusetts Controlled Substances Act - Mass. Gen. Laws. ch. 94C, § 31 Possession for Personal Use An adult may possess up to one ounce of marijuana; up to 5 grams of marijuana may be marijuana concentrate. Within a primary residence, an adult may possess up to 10 ounces of marijuana and any marijuana produced by marijuana plants cultivated on the premises. An adult who possesses more than one ounce of marijuana or marijuana products must secure the products with a lock. • Mass. Gen. Laws. ch. 94G, § 7 • Mass. Gen. Laws. ch. 94G § 13(b) Possession of more than one ounce of marijuana is punishable by a fine of $500 and/or imprisonment of up to 6 months. However, first offenders of the controlled substances act will be placed on probation and all official records relating to the conviction will be sealed upon successful completion of probation. Subsequent offenses may result in a fine of $2000 and/or imprisonment of up to 2 years. Individuals previously convicted of felonies under the controlled substances act who are arrested with over an ounce of marijuana may be subject to a fine of $2000 and/or up to 2 years of imprisonment. • Mass. Gen. Laws. ch. 94C, § 34 Possession with Intent to Distribute For first offenders, possessing less than 50 pounds of marijuana with the intent to manufacture, distribute, dispense or cultivate is punishable by a fine of $500-$5,000 and/or imprisonment of up to 2 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiviral Effect of Budesonide Against SARS-Cov-2
    viruses Communication Antiviral Effect of Budesonide against SARS-CoV-2 Natalie Heinen 1 , Toni Luise Meister 1 , Mara Klöhn 1 , Eike Steinmann 1, Daniel Todt 1,2 and Stephanie Pfaender 1,* 1 Department of Molecular and Medical Virology, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany; [email protected] (N.H.); [email protected] (T.L.M.); [email protected] (M.K.); [email protected] (E.S.); [email protected] (D.T.) 2 European Virus Bioinformatics Center (EVBC), 07743 Jena, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-234-32-23189 Abstract: Treatment options for COVID-19, a disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, are currently severely limited. Therefore, antiviral drugs that efficiently reduce SARS-CoV-2 replication or alleviate COVID-19 symptoms are urgently needed. Inhaled glucocorticoids are currently being discussed in the context of treatment for COVID-19, partly based on a previous study that reported reduced recovery times in cases of mild COVID-19 after inhalative administration of the glucocorticoid budesonide. Given various reports that describe the potential antiviral activity of glucocorticoids against respiratory viruses, we aimed to analyze a potential antiviral activity of budesonide against SARS-CoV-2 and circulating variants of concern (VOC) B.1.1.7 (alpha) and B.1.351 (beta). We demonstrate a dose-dependent inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 that was comparable between all viral variants tested while cell viability remains unaffected. Our results are encouraging as they could indicate a multimodal mode of action of budesonide against SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, which could contribute to an improved clinical performance.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Data Sheet
    NEW ZEALAND DATA SHEET 1. PRODUCT NAME TRELEGY ELLIPTA 100/62.5/25 fluticasone furoate (100 micrograms)/umeclidinium (as bromide) (62.5 micrograms)/vilanterol (as trifenatate) (25 micrograms), powder for inhalation 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Each delivered dose (the dose leaving the mouthpiece of the inhaler) contains 92 micrograms fluticasone furoate, 55 micrograms umeclidinium (equivalent to 65 micrograms umeclidinium [as bromide]) and 22 micrograms vilanterol (as trifenatate). This corresponds to a pre-dispensed dose of 100 micrograms fluticasone furoate, 62.5 micrograms umeclidinium (equivalent to 74.2 micrograms umeclidinium bromide) and 25 micrograms vilanterol (as trifenatate). Excipient with known effect: Each delivered dose contains approximately 25 milligrams of lactose (as monohydrate). For the full list of excipients, see Section 6.1 List of excipients. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Powder for inhalation. White powder in a light grey inhaler (Ellipta) with a beige mouthpiece cover and a dose counter. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1. Therapeutic indications TRELEGY ELLIPTA is indicated for the maintenance treatment of adults with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who require treatment with a long- acting muscarinic receptor antagonist (LAMA) + long-acting beta2-receptor agonist (LABA) + inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). TRELEGY ELLIPTA should not be used for the initiation of COPD treatment. 4.2. Dose and method of administration Patients can be changed from their existing inhalers to TRELEGY ELLIPTA at the next dose. However it is important that patients do not take other LABA or LAMA or ICS while taking TRELEGY ELLIPTA. A stepwise approach to the management of COPD is recommended, including the cessation of smoking and a pulmonary rehabilitation program.
    [Show full text]
  • Steroid Use in Prednisone Allergy Abby Shuck, Pharmd Candidate
    Steroid Use in Prednisone Allergy Abby Shuck, PharmD candidate 2015 University of Findlay If a patient has an allergy to prednisone and methylprednisolone, what (if any) other corticosteroid can the patient use to avoid an allergic reaction? Corticosteroids very rarely cause allergic reactions in patients that receive them. Since corticosteroids are typically used to treat severe allergic reactions and anaphylaxis, it seems unlikely that these drugs could actually induce an allergic reaction of their own. However, between 0.5-5% of people have reported any sort of reaction to a corticosteroid that they have received.1 Corticosteroids can cause anything from minor skin irritations to full blown anaphylactic shock. Worsening of allergic symptoms during corticosteroid treatment may not always mean that the patient has failed treatment, although it may appear to be so.2,3 There are essentially four classes of corticosteroids: Class A, hydrocortisone-type, Class B, triamcinolone acetonide type, Class C, betamethasone type, and Class D, hydrocortisone-17-butyrate and clobetasone-17-butyrate type. Major* corticosteroids in Class A include cortisone, hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone, prednisolone, and prednisone. Major* corticosteroids in Class B include budesonide, fluocinolone, and triamcinolone. Major* corticosteroids in Class C include beclomethasone and dexamethasone. Finally, major* corticosteroids in Class D include betamethasone, fluticasone, and mometasone.4,5 Class D was later subdivided into Class D1 and D2 depending on the presence or 5,6 absence of a C16 methyl substitution and/or halogenation on C9 of the steroid B-ring. It is often hard to determine what exactly a patient is allergic to if they experience a reaction to a corticosteroid.
    [Show full text]
  • Etats Rapides
    List of European Pharmacopoeia Reference Standards Effective from 2015/12/24 Order Reference Standard Batch n° Quantity Sale Information Monograph Leaflet Storage Price Code per vial Unit Y0001756 Exemestane for system suitability 1 10 mg 1 2766 Yes +5°C ± 3°C 79 ! Y0001561 Abacavir sulfate 1 20 mg 1 2589 Yes +5°C ± 3°C 79 ! Y0001552 Abacavir for peak identification 1 10 mg 1 2589 Yes +5°C ± 3°C 79 ! Y0001551 Abacavir for system suitability 1 10 mg 1 2589 Yes +5°C ± 3°C 79 ! Y0000055 Acamprosate calcium - reference spectrum 1 n/a 1 1585 79 ! Y0000116 Acamprosate impurity A 1 50 mg 1 3-aminopropane-1-sulphonic acid 1585 Yes +5°C ± 3°C 79 ! Y0000500 Acarbose 3 100 mg 1 See leaflet ; Batch 2 is valid until 31 August 2015 2089 Yes +5°C ± 3°C 79 ! Y0000354 Acarbose for identification 1 10 mg 1 2089 Yes +5°C ± 3°C 79 ! Y0000427 Acarbose for peak identification 3 20 mg 1 Batch 2 is valid until 31 January 2015 2089 Yes +5°C ± 3°C 79 ! A0040000 Acebutolol hydrochloride 1 50 mg 1 0871 Yes +5°C ± 3°C 79 ! Y0000359 Acebutolol impurity B 2 10 mg 1 -[3-acetyl-4-[(2RS)-2-hydroxy-3-[(1-methylethyl)amino] propoxy]phenyl] 0871 Yes +5°C ± 3°C 79 ! acetamide (diacetolol) Y0000127 Acebutolol impurity C 1 20 mg 1 N-(3-acetyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)butanamide 0871 Yes +5°C ± 3°C 79 ! Y0000128 Acebutolol impurity I 2 0.004 mg 1 N-[3-acetyl-4-[(2RS)-3-(ethylamino)-2-hydroxypropoxy]phenyl] 0871 Yes +5°C ± 3°C 79 ! butanamide Y0000056 Aceclofenac - reference spectrum 1 n/a 1 1281 79 ! Y0000085 Aceclofenac impurity F 2 15 mg 1 benzyl[[[2-[(2,6-dichlorophenyl)amino]phenyl]acetyl]oxy]acetate
    [Show full text]
  • St John's Institute of Dermatology
    St John’s Institute of Dermatology Topical steroids This leaflet explains more about topical steroids and how they are used to treat a variety of skin conditions. If you have any questions or concerns, please speak to a doctor or nurse caring for you. What are topical corticosteroids and how do they work? Topical corticosteroids are steroids that are applied onto the skin and are used to treat a variety of skin conditions. The type of steroid found in these medicines is similar to those produced naturally in the body and they work by reducing inflammation within the skin, making it less red and itchy. What are the different strengths of topical corticosteroids? Topical steroids come in a number of different strengths. It is therefore very important that you follow the advice of your doctor or specialist nurse and apply the correct strength of steroid to a given area of the body. The strengths of the most commonly prescribed topical steroids in the UK are listed in the table below. Table 1 - strengths of commonly prescribed topical steroids Strength Chemical name Common trade names Mild Hydrocortisone 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.5% Hydrocortisone Dioderm®, Efcortelan®, Mildison® Moderate Betamethasone valerate 0.025% Betnovate-RD® Clobetasone butyrate 0.05% Eumovate®, Clobavate® Fluocinolone acetonide 0.001% Synalar 1 in 4 dilution® Fluocortolone 0.25% Ultralanum Plain® Fludroxycortide 0.0125% Haelan® Tape Strong Betamethasone valerate 0.1% Betnovate® Diflucortolone valerate 0.1% Nerisone® Fluocinolone acetonide 0.025% Synalar® Fluticasone propionate 0.05% Cutivate® Hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% Locoid® Mometasone furoate 0.1% Elocon® Very strong Clobetasol propionate 0.1% Dermovate®, Clarelux® Diflucortolone valerate 0.3% Nerisone Forte® 1 of 5 In adults, stronger steroids are generally used on the body and mild or moderate steroids are used on the face and skin folds (armpits, breast folds, groin and genitals).
    [Show full text]
  • FLONASE (Fluticasone Propionate) Nasal Spray Bacterial, Viral, Or Parasitic Infection; Ocular Herpes Simplex)
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION • Hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis, angioedema, urticaria, These highlights do not include all the information needed to use contact dermatitis, rash) have been reported after administration of FLONASE safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for FLONASE nasal spray. Discontinue FLONASE nasal spray if such FLONASE. reactions occur. (5.3) • Potential worsening of infections (e.g., existing tuberculosis; fungal, FLONASE (fluticasone propionate) nasal spray bacterial, viral, or parasitic infection; ocular herpes simplex). Use with Initial U.S. Approval: 1994 caution in patients with these infections. More serious or even fatal course --------------------------- RECENT MAJOR CHANGES --------------------------- of chickenpox or measles can occur in susceptible patients. (5.4) • Hypercorticism and adrenal suppression may occur with very high Warnings and Precautions, Glaucoma and Cataracts (5.2) 1/2019 dosages or at the regular dosage in susceptible individuals. If such --------------------------- INDICATIONS AND USAGE ---------------------------- changes occur, discontinue FLONASE nasal spray slowly. (5.5) FLONASE nasal spray is a corticosteroid indicated for the management of the • Monitor growth of pediatric patients. (5.7) nasal symptoms of perennial nonallergic rhinitis in adult and pediatric patients ------------------------------ ADVERSE REACTIONS ------------------------------ aged 4 years and older. (1) The most common adverse reactions (>3%) are headache, pharyngitis, ----------------------- DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ----------------------- epistaxis, nasal burning/nasal irritation, nausea/vomiting, asthma symptoms, For intranasal use only. Recommended starting dosages: and cough. (6.1) • Adults: 2 sprays per nostril once daily (200 mcg per day). (2.1) To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact • Adolescents and children aged 4 years and older: 1 spray per nostril once GlaxoSmithKline at 1-888-825-5249 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or daily (100 mcg per day).
    [Show full text]
  • September 2017 ~ Resource #330909
    −This Clinical Resource gives subscribers additional insight related to the Recommendations published in− September 2017 ~ Resource #330909 Medications Stored in the Refrigerator (Information below comes from current U.S. and Canadian product labeling and is current as of date of publication) Proper medication storage is important to ensure medication shelf life until the manufacturer expiration date and to reduce waste. Many meds are recommended to be stored at controlled-room temperature. However, several meds require storage in the refrigerator or freezer to ensure stability. See our toolbox, Medication Storage: Maintaining the Cold Chain, for helpful storage tips and other resources. Though most meds requiring storage at temperatures colder than room temperature should be stored in the refrigerator, expect to see a few meds require storage in the freezer. Some examples of medications requiring frozen storage conditions include: anthrax immune globulin (Anthrasil [U.S. only]), carmustine wafer (Gliadel [U.S. only]), cholera (live) vaccine (Vaxchora), dinoprostone vaginal insert (Cervidil), dinoprostone vaginal suppository (Prostin E2 [U.S.]), varicella vaccine (Varivax [U.S.]; Varivax III [Canada] can be stored in the refrigerator or freezer), zoster vaccine (Zostavax [U.S.]; Zostavax II [Canada] can be stored in the refrigerator or freezer). Use the list below to help identify medications requiring refrigerator storage and become familiar with acceptable temperature excursions from recommended storage conditions. Abbreviations: RT = room temperature Abaloparatide (Tymlos [U.S.]) Aflibercept (Eylea) Amphotericin B (Abelcet, Fungizone) • Once open, may store at RT (68°F to 77°F • May store at RT (77°F [25°C]) for up to Anakinra (Kineret) [20°C to 25°C]) for up to 30 days.
    [Show full text]