DOCSLIB.ORG

Correspondence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Correspondence Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Region To: September 30, 2020 Debbie Scanlon Manager, Approvals Unit Source Protection Programs Branch Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Subject: Request for extension of the policy timeline for risk management plans in the Halton- Hamilton Source Protection Region Dear Debbie, The Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Plan contains polices that utilise Part IV of the Clean Water Act, including the establishment of risk management plans by risk management officials, and also a policy setting a deadline. The Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Plan policy G-1 states that risk management plans for existing significant threats must be established within five years of the date that the Halton- Hamilton Source Protection Plan comes into effect. Therefore all risk management plans for existing threats within the Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Region (SPR) must be established by December 31, 2020. As described in the 2019 Annual Progress Report for the Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Plan, municipalities have made great progress in establishing risk management plans for significant threat activities. In 2019, two significant threat activities were added (commercial fertilizer application and use of land by livestock). The municipal risk management officials continue to put full effort into establishing the last few risk management plans. It is anticipated that there are two risk management plans in the Halton-Hamilton SPR that will likely be delayed beyond 2020 due to the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic and the nature of the activities which require more time for negotiations with the persons undertaking the activities. Risk management officials are keen on continuing their collaborative, negotiated process with the landowner. A report #SPC-20-09-05 was presented on this matter to the Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Committee on September 8, 2020. The committee directed staff to seek a one-year extension on the deadline for risk management plan completion. www.protectingwater.ca 2596 Britannia Road West, Burlington, ON L7P 0G3 Phone: 905-336-1158 ext. 2237. Mobile: 289-681-8697 Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Region Therefore, I am writing to request your permission for a one-year extension of the timeline for establishing risk management plans in the Halton-Hamilton SPR, such that the revised timeline is December 31, 2021. I look forward to hearing from you and gaining your permission for the requested policy timeline extension. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Chitra Gowda Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Region (Senior Manager, Watershed Planning and Source Protection, Conservation Halton) Attachment: Source Protection Committee Report #20-09-05: S. 58 Risk Management Plans Policy Timeline Extension Cc: Tea Peshava, Liaison Officer, Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Barbara Veale, Source Protection Committee - Conservation Authority Liaison (Director, Planning and Watershed Management, Conservation Halton) Scott Peck, Source Protection Committee - Conservation Authority Liaison (Deputy Chief Administrative Officer/Director, Watershed Planning & Engineering, Hamilton Conservation Authority) www.protectingwater.ca 2596 Britannia Road West, Burlington, ON L7P 0G3 Phone: 905-336-1158 ext. 2237. Mobile: 289-681-8697 www.protectingwater.ca 2596 Britannia Road West, Burlington, ON L7P 0G3 Phone: 905-336-1158 ext. 2237. Mobile: 289-681-8697 Ministry of the Environment, Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Conservation and Parks Protection de la nature et des Parcs Conservation and Source Direction de la protection de la nature et Protection Branch des sources 14th Floor 14e étage 40 St. Clair Ave. West 40, avenue St. Clair Ouest Toronto ON M4V 1M2 Toronto (Ontario) M4V 1M2 November 6, 2020 Chitra Gowda Senior Manager, Watershed Planning and Source Protection Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Region Re: Request for Extension of Policy Implementation Timelines Related to Section 58 Risk Management Plans, Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Plan Dear Chitra, I am writing in response to your request for an extension to the policy timeline for implementing source protection plan policies for various activities designated as requiring a risk management plan under section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 in the Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Region. We understand that the municipal risk management officials have made progress, but that some risk management plans have proven difficult to negotiate and finalize. Policy G-1 a. in the Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Plan sets out a timeline of 5 years (i.e., December 31, 2020) for the establishment of risk management plans for existing threat activities. Sections 58 and 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 allow for such a grace period to be applied to activities established prior to the source protection plan taking effect in December 2015 (i.e., defined as “existing” activities in the source protection plan). It is an offence under s.106 of the Act for “existing” activities to be engaged in after the grace period has passed. The source protection authority has proposed a new policy implementation timeline of December 2021 to complete the risk management plans that may be required under policies T-20-C (application and storage of agricultural source material), T-40-C (fuel), and T-47-C (livestock grazing, pasturing land, outdoor confinement areas, and farm animal yards). In consideration of the challenges outlined in your letter, I hereby grant your request for an extension to December 31, 2021. I acknowledge and commend you for working with the affected municipalities to implement source protection plan policies. I appreciate you identifying the remaining activities that require a risk management plan. To assure the ministry and local communities of the intent and ability to comply with the policies by the new deadline, I request that the source protection authority, municipalities, and risk management officials work together to summarize what is necessary to complete risk management plans by the new policy Page 1 of 2 timeline. I am requesting this summary by April 1, 2021. In advance of this date, I encourage you to continue working with your liaison officer and program analyst to address any questions or issues with this approach, as well as to review and provide feedback in advance of your formal submission. All other requirements of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and Ontario Regulation 287/07 continue to apply. When you next move forward with amendments or an update to your source protection plan, it is recommended you include revisions to the text of policy G-1 a. to reflect the extended policy timelines. Until that time, you may wish to include a note for readers about the extended policy timeline. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Debbie Scanlon Manager, Source Protection Approvals, Source Protection Programs Branch c: Gerry Smallegange, Chair, Halton Region Source Protection Authority Lloyd Ferguson, Chair, Hamilton Region Source Protection Authority Robert Edmondson, Chair, Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Committee Keley Katona, Director, Source Protection Programs Branch Page 2 of 2 Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Region Chair Gary Carr October 27, 2020 Regional Municipality of Halton 1151 Bronte Road Oakville, Ontario L6M 3L1 Subject: Directors Award from the American Water Works Association Dear Chair Carr: On behalf of the Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Committee I wish to congratulate the Region of Halton on being the first Canadian municipality to earn the Directors Award from the American Water Works Association, in recognition of optimized plant performance and high quality drinking water beyond regulatory requirements. As you are aware, our multi-stakeholder Committee has developed a source protection plan, in collaboration with our municipalities, to protect municipal drinking water sources in the Halton- Hamilton Source Protection Region. The Committee relies on the watershed expertise of Conservation Halton and the Hamilton Conservation Authority. When the Honourable Justice Dennis O’Connor wrote his report and recommendations on the Walkerton tragedy that took place in 2000, he stressed the need for a multiple barrier approach to protecting drinking water supplies and safeguarding human health. This included effective and robust measures dealing with source water protection, water treatment, distribution, testing and training. Again, we congratulate the Region of Halton upon your significant achievement in ongoing plant optimization and supplying residents and businesses with the highest-possible drinking water quality! I would also like to take this opportunity to thank you for your staff’s active and valuable involvement on the Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Committee. Yours truly, Robert Edmondson Chair, Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Committee Cc. Members, Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Committee Chair, Conservation Halton Chair, Hamilton Conservation Authority Senior Manager, Watershed Planning and Source Protection www.protectingwater.ca 2596 Britannia Road West, Burlington, ON L7P 0G3 Phone: 905-336-1158 ext. 2237. Mobile: 289-681-8697 Chitra Gowda From: Chitra Gowda Sent: November-25-20 9:13 AM To: Chitra Gowda Subject: Directors Award: Letter of Congratulations from the Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Committee From: Carr, Gary <[email protected]> Sent: October-28-20 7:54 AM To: Chitra Gowda
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Region Chair Gary Carr October 27
    Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Region Chair Gary Carr October 27, 2020 Regional Municipality of Halton 1151 Bronte Road Oakville, Ontario L6M 3L1 Subject: Directors Award from the American Water Works Association Dear Chair Carr: On behalf of the Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Committee I wish to congratulate the Region of Halton on being the first Canadian municipality to earn the Directors Award from the American Water Works Association, in recognition of optimized plant performance and high quality drinking water beyond regulatory requirements. As you are aware, our multi-stakeholder Committee has developed a source protection plan, in collaboration with our municipalities, to protect municipal drinking water sources in the Halton- Hamilton Source Protection Region. The Committee relies on the watershed expertise of Conservation Halton and the Hamilton Conservation Authority. When the Honourable Justice Dennis O’Connor wrote his report and recommendations on the Walkerton tragedy that took place in 2000, he stressed the need for a multiple barrier approach to protecting drinking water supplies and safeguarding human health. This included effective and robust measures dealing with source water protection, water treatment, distribution, testing and training. Again, we congratulate the Region of Halton upon your significant achievement in ongoing plant optimization and supplying residents and businesses with the highest-possible drinking water quality! I would also like to take this opportunity to thank you for your staff’s active and valuable involvement on the Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Committee. Yours truly, Robert Edmondson Chair, Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Committee Cc. Members, Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Committee Chair, Conservation Halton Chair, Hamilton Conservation Authority Senior Manager, Watershed Planning and Source Protection www.protectingwater.ca 2596 Britannia Road West, Burlington, ON L7P 0G3 Phone: 905-336-1158 ext.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-12 Rochester Americans Media Guide (.Pdf)
    Rochester Americans Table of Contents Rochester Americans Personnel History Rochester Americans Staff Directory........................................................................................4 All-Time Records vs. Current AHL Clubs ..........................................................................203 Amerks 2011-12 Schedule ............................................................................................................5 All-Time Coaches .........................................................................................................................204 Amerks Executive Staff ....................................................................................................................6 Coaches Lifetime Records ......................................................................................................205 Amerks Hockey Department Staff ..........................................................................................10 Presidents & General Managers ...........................................................................................206 Amerks Front Office Personnel ................................................................................................ 17 All-Time Captains ..........................................................................................................................207 Affiliation Timeline ........................................................................................................................208 Players Amerks Firsts & Milestones
    [Show full text]
  • Ted Arnott, Mpp Wellington-Halton Hills
    WELLINGTON-HALTON HILLS MPP TED ARNOTT Keeping in Touch – Update 2013 TED ARNOTT, MPP WELLINGTON-HALTON HILLS County of Wellington launches Economic Acton GO train station opens Development Strategy Keeping in Touch – Update 2013 On January 7, after a nearly 20 year absence, GO and Kitchener. He raised the issue in the Ontario train service resumed in Acton when the 6:28 am Legislature multiple times, had discussions with the In recognition of the need to be proactive in supporting • An online comprehensive business directory for train arrived on its way to Union Station in Toronto. Minister of Transportation, and arranged meetings business and in accommodating new residential and Wellington County. in Toronto. In December 2008, he tabled a Private employment growth, the County of Wellington has adopted • A Community Investment Profile showing all the reasons Leadership needed on provincial Wellington-Halton Hills MPP Ted Arnott was on its first ever Economic Development Strategy. why Wellington is a great place to live, invest, and work hand to join the community celebration and, along Member’s Resolution calling upon the Government An economic development online presence for our County with Mayor Rick Bonnette, boarded the first train on to extend GO Transit rail service to include stops The plan was developed in consultation with over 550 • debt and deficit in Acton, Guelph, and Kitchener-Waterloo by entrepreneurs, residents and partner agencies in Wellington providing access to socio-economic information, business his way to Queen’s Park. By Ted Arnott, MPP Pages 104-105 of the fall economic statement’s September 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • December 4, 2020 Statement from Halton Regional Chair and Halton
    December 4, 2020 Statement from Halton Regional Chair and Halton Mayors on the CN Truck-Rail Hub We strongly support the government’s Speech from the Throne pledging to put the health of Canadians first. We are calling on the federal government to act on that pledge by rejecting CN’s proposed truck-rail hub in Milton. Health effects were expressly part of the federal review of this project by an independent and expert panel. For the first time ever, the federal panel concluded its review by finding that this project will have significant adverse effects on human health. • The project would expose Halton residents to PM 2.5, which is “inherently dangerous and unsafe at any level of exposure.” • There is no way to mitigate the significant health effects that CN would cause by this project. • The local neighbourhood has grown to a community of approximately 34,000 current and future residents, one hospital, twelve schools and two long-term care homes, within 1 km of the proposed site, and still greater populations beyond 1 km. • Now, after decades of local planning for high-density growth, including participation from CN, CN wants to change its plans, claim immunity from municipal and provincial controls, and ignore local concerns by putting this project right beside Milton’s rapidly growing residential communities. • Even 19th century laws and courts rejected railway immunity from local controls protecting the environment. This is no way for Canada to work today and is completely inconsistent with the Federal Government’s commitment to “build back better.” If the Federal Cabinet decides to approve this proposed truck-rail hub, residents will forever be exposed to significant adverse effects on human health.
    [Show full text]
  • Memo to All Staff
    MINUTES of the meeting of the Board of Directors of Toronto Global held at Halton Region, 1151 Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario on Tuesday, February 4, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. Present: Mark Cohon - Chair Janet Ecker - Vice Chair Cecile Chung Lisa De Wilde Steve Howse Bilal Khan Catherine Roche (via teleconference at 320 p.m.) By Invitation: Toby Lennox - Chief Executive Officer Winston Young - Chief Financial Officer Dan Hengeveld - Director, Investment Attraction Leslie Sutherland - Corporate Secretary, VP, HR & Business Operations Julia Sakas - Director of Communications & Marketing Aneta Krzysciak - Executive Assistant, Senior Management and Assistant Corporate Secretary Erika Lewis - Senior Communications Specialist Nicole Guy - Recording Secretary, MinuteTakers Inc. (via teleconference) Guest: Chair Gary Carr - Halton Region John Davidson - Halton Region Christine Carrington - Halton Region 1. CALL TO ORDER (a) Notice and Quorum – Proper notice having been given and there being a quorum present, M. Cohon called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. and presided as Chair. (b) Conflict of Interest Declaration – No conflict of interest was declared under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act and the Ontario Business Corporations Act. 2. HALTON REGION PRESENTATION Chairman Gary Carr welcomed the Board to Halton and thanked the Toronto Global Board and staff for their efforts on behalf of the region. (a) Overview – John Davidson and Christine Carrington of Halton presented information on the region, including quality of life achievements, growth and new construction, industry and employment, etc. It was noted that Halton is the fastest-growing region in Canada. (b) A number of new developments were highlighted for information.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael A. Brown, Member for Algoma-Manitoulin
    Legislative Assemblée Assembly législative of Ontario de l’Ontario OFFICE OF THE INTEGRITY COMMISSIONER ~ REPORT OF LYNN MORRISON ACTING INTEGRITY COMMISSIONER RE: MICHAEL A. BROWN, MEMBER FOR ALGOMA-MANITOULIN TORONTO, ONTARIO FEBRUARY 14, 2008 RE: MICHAEL A. BROWN, MEMBER FOR ALGOMA – MANITOULIN [1] In a complaint made on November 6, 2007 under section 30 of the Members’ Integrity Act, 1994, Peter Kormos, the member for Welland1, has alleged that Michael Brown, the member for Algoma-Manitoulin and then Speaker of the Legislative Assembly, breached Parliamentary Convention and thus contravened the Members’ Integrity Act, 1994 by attending a post-election celebratory dinner for Liberal caucus members and spouses on October 28, 2007. [2] This complaint requires consideration of the jurisdiction of this Office to deal with an alleged contravention that could only be made against one member of the Assembly – the Speaker. [3] On November 6, 2007, Mr. Kormos filed his complaint with this Office in accordance with the Directive regarding the procedure for complaints under section 30 of the Members’ Integrity Act, 1994. Mr. Brown filed responding submissions on November 19, 2007. [4] Mr. Kormos wrote to me on November 30, 2007 to request that I cease consideration of the complaint in light of the fact that on November 28, 2007, Steve Peters, MPP, was elected to the Office of Speaker. As Mr. Brown was the subject of the complaint, I sought his position with respect to this request and he advised that he would like me to deal with the complaint in the usual way. Mr. Kormos filed reply submissions on December 10, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey on the Ontario Speakership
    A Survey on the Ontario Speakership by Aamir Taiyeb The Speakership is an old and venerable office. Much has been written about the Speakership in Westminster, where the office, as well as much of Canada’s parliamentary traditions originated. However, the Speakership at Westminster is not the same as the Speakership in Canada and the thirteen provincial and territorial Speakerships also have some distinctions among them. This paper examines certain issues relating to the Speakership in Ontario including the election of the Speaker, the Speaker’s role in the house, the Speaker’s role as representative of the Legislature and the importance of personality. In so doing, it attempts to provide a better understanding of the role of the ‘first commoner’ in Ontario. s recently as May 2008, in a report entitled Justice. Throughout Ontario’s history, Speakers have Everything Old is New Again: Observations on played a vital role in shaping the highest institution in AParliamentary Reform, Thomas Axworthy, the province. recommended that the Speaker of the House of The Election of Speaker Commons make better use of her or his ability to influence the outcomes, efficiency and working of The procedure for the Speaker’s election is provided the House through the use of ‘moral suasion’. The for in the Standing Orders, the rules of procedure report also urged the Speaker to use his authority to that govern the conduct of the Legislative Assembly undo logjams in Parliamentary Committees1. This is of Ontario. According to Standing Order 3, the Clerk evidence that the Speakership is, and continues to be, administers the election and the voting process itself is held in high esteem across Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognized Parties: the 8 Member Critical Mass Question in Ontario
    Recognized Parties: The 8 Member Critical Mass Question in Ontario Katherine Preiss, 2010-2011 Intern Ontario Legislature Internship Programme 1303A Whitney Block, Queen’s Park Toronto, ON M7A 1A2 Tel: 416-325-0040 Contact: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The Legislative Assembly of Ontario is run by, and for, its political parties. House Business is entirely predicated upon the existence of political parties to divvy up duties among their members. Not just a creature of convention, the standing orders place a great deal of emphasis on the importance of the political party in the day-to-day functioning of the house. Although the political party is like to be a permanent fixture in Ontario politics, the current procedural structure leaves no room for effective independent MPPs. In order to have resources, funding, and even a guaranteed question in question period, a member must have party status. The intent of this study is to evaluate the 1999 decision to create an 8 member critical mass for recognized parties in the Standing orders, and the repercussions this decision had on the Ontario NDP following the 2003 provincial election. This paper seeks to answer the question: should there be a critical mass for recognized parties in Ontario? Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association (CPSA), Waterloo, ON, May 2011 This paper is a draft, please do not cite or distribute without the authors’ permission. 2 Introduction The political party is a fixture of Westminster style parliaments. By integrating the government with the legislature, Westminster parliament necessitates – at the very least – a governing party and an opposition party to both govern and hold the government to account.
    [Show full text]
  • Honors & Awards
    2009-10 WCHA MEN’S YEARBOOK HONORS & AWARDS THE HOBEY BAKER MEMORIAL AWARD HISTORY OF THE AWARD he Hobey Baker Memorial Award is presented annually to the college hockey player who best exemplifies the qualities that Princeton University’s Hobey Baker himself demon- Tstrated as an athlete and as a servant of his country in the early 1900’s. Hobey Baker was a pure sportsman and despised foul play. As a player, he opened up the game with his speed and skills, setting new standards for the way the game was played. Prior to the announcement of the winner, there is an announcement of the Top 10 Finalists and then a Hobey ‘Hat Trick’ of the top three finalists. The first recipient of the award in 1981 – Neal Broten of Minnesota – was from the WCHA. Other Hobey Baker winners from the WCHA have been Tom Kurvers, D, UMD, 1984; Bill Watson, F, UMD, 1985; Tony Hrkac, F, UND, 1987; Robb Stauber, G, UM, 1988; Chris Marinucci, F, UMD, 1994; Brian Bonin, F, UM, 1996; Jordan Leopold, D, UM, 2002; Peter Sejna, F, CC, 2003; Junior Lessard, F, UMD, 2004; Marty Sertich, F, CC, 2005; Matt Carle, D, DU, 2006; and Ryan Duncan, F, UND, 2007. Duncan became the WCHA’s sixth consecutive Hobey winner and 13th overall. THE HOBEY BAKER STORY Hobey Baker had all the attributes of a fabulous athlete: a great physique, fantastic reflexes, instant coordination of hand and eye, iron discipline, blazing courage. But he was different. Hobey Baker was the college athlete supreme: The gentleman sportsman, the amateur in the pure sense, playing the game for the sport, who never fouled, despised publicity and refused professional offers.
    [Show full text]
  • Spartan Hockey History 2014-15 Michigan State University Hockey 145 Spartan Hockey History Msuspartans.Com
    SPARTAN HOCKEY HISTORY 2014-15 MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY HOCKEY 145 SPARTAN HOCKEY HISTORY MSUSPARTANS.COM SPARTAN HOCKEY TIMELINE OF TRADITION Michigan State has long been at the forefront of collegiate hockey success. Spartan hockey ranks among the winningest programs in NCAA history, and both teams and players alike have reached the pinnacle of achieve- ment. From its championship tradition to record-setting players and coaches, Spartan hockey truly embodies a Commitment to Excellence. Jan. 11, 1922 – Michigan State March 16, 1967 – MSU, fifth in the WCHA regular season, de- plays its first intercollegiate hock- feats champion Michigan Tech, 2-1 in overtime, to win the ey game, falling to Michigan, 5-1. playoffs for the second straight season. Doug Volmar nets both goals, including the winner at 5:44 of overtime. Feb. 11, 1923 – MSU gets its first win, 6-1 over the Lansing March 18, 1967 – After falling to Boston University in the Independents. NCAA semifinals, MSU captures third place with a 6-1 win over North Dakota in the NCAA consolation game. Jan. 12, 1950 – MSU plays its first game since 1930, losing to Nov. 10, 1973 – Tom Ross ties the school record with five Michigan Tech, 6-2. goals in a 9-5 win over Notre Dame at MSU Ice Arena. Nov. 29, 1951 – MSU plays its Dec. 28, 1973 – MSU wins its first Great Lakes Invitational, first game under legendary defeating Michigan Tech, 5-4, in the finals. coach Amo Bessone, defeating Carl Moore played on MSU’s first Ontario Agricultural College, team in 1922, and captained the Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerville Wants Region to Cap Payments to Toronto
    Independent & Free Press, Wednesday, January 17, 2007 3 Somerville wants Region to cap payments to Toronto MELANIE HENNESSEY got to get it fixed.” do regarding the Acting CAO Jane MacCaskill explained Special to The IFP At this point, the ‘It (the pooling pooling situation. staff has been working with other GTA 2006 pooling figure “I think we need municipalities on an exit strategy from the A regional committee is pushing for a hasn’t been finalized system) is to get very aggressive pooling system. freeze on how much Halton pays to help and it’s not known broke— with the Province,” But for the time being, she said it is a Toronto cover its social service costs. how much Halton Carr said. “It (pool- “requirement and obligation that we pay.” Better known as GTA pooling, the sys- will actually be asked we’ve got to get it ing money) is a huge Other local municipalities, like York tem was introduced by the Province in to pay for 2007. fixed.’ amount of our bud- and Peel, have already frozen their GTA 1998 to support the city’s social assistance Somerville went get.” pooling payments. and social housing requirements— some- on to point out that Oakville Coun- Halton’s pooling costs have steadily thing that’s expected to cost the average with a provincial —Councillor Clark Somerville cillor Fred Oliver risen since 2003, going from about $34 Halton taxpayer about $180 this year. election coming this added, “I think it’s million then to the current estimated $41 During the health and social services year, it’s a good time that time of year that million— a figure that’s also proposed in committee’s budget deliberations last for council to make an issue of pooling.
    [Show full text]
  • Halton Region Where Innovation Creates Opportunities
    Halton Region Where Innovation Creates Opportunities Burlington • Halton Hills • Milton • Oakville ver 490,000 people live in the dynamic, fast-growing Region Roxul Inc., a world leader in green insulation technologies has its North of Halton, located in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). It American headquarters in Milton. A subsidiary of Denmark’s Rockwool O encompasses the City of Burlington and Towns of Oakville, International, Roxul invested $150 million in 2009 in the Milton facility Milton and Halton Hills. Halton Region’s prime location in the western to triple production capacity, and implement state of the art energy and section of the Greater Toronto Area offers easy access to a well-developed waste control systems to improve operations. HALTON REGION transportation system, U.S. border crossings and three international airports. Halton also has a diverse range of industry sectors, a highly Communications and Power Industries Inc. (CPI), located in Halton skilled and educated workforce and unparalleled quality of life. Halton truly Hills, designs and manufactures medical and satellite communication is a location of choice for business. products. A division of CPI International of California, they recently undertook a significant expansion of the Georgetown, Halton Hills facility, Halton Region has experienced strong economic growth throughout which now totals 187,000 square feet, to accommodate soaring demand. the past 20 years. The annual construction value of residential and non-residential development in Halton is 86 per cent higher than Driving this industry diversity is access to a highly skilled Halton labour it was in 1989. While a significant proportion of the development force of an estimated 291,000 workers.
    [Show full text]