DOCSLIB.ORG

An Exploratory Study of Credibility Issues in Astronomy Press Releases Research & Applications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Exploratory Study of Credibility Issues in Astronomy Press Releases Research & Applications An Exploratory Study of Credibility Issues in Astronomy Press Releases Research & Applications Lars Holm Nielsen Nanna Torpe Jørgensen Lars Lindberg Christensen Roskilde University Kim Jantzen ESA/Hubble ESA/Hubble Roskilde University E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Summary Key Words Current developments in the media marketplace and an increased need for visibility to secure funding are leading inevitably to faster, simpler and more Credibility aggressive science communication. This article presents the results of an Hype exploratory study of potential credibility problems in astronomy press releases, Science Communication their causes, consequences and possible remedies. The study consisted of Astronomy eleven open-ended interviews with journalists, scientists and public information Visibility Press Releases officers. Results suggest that credibility issues are central to communication, deeply integrated into the workflow and can have severe consequences for the actors (especially the scientist), but are an unavoidable part of the communication process. Many scientists have the impression that sci- studies about this important, but rather elusive, Introduction ence reporting is inaccurate and that science topic are difficult to find in the literature. Science communication operates in the mod- news is often overstated (Shortland and Gre- ern media marketplace and competes for gory 1991, p. 8; Dunwoody 1986, p. 11). This How widespread are credibility problems in head lines with politics, business, sports, crime perception has, in the case of astronomy, been astronomy press releases? What factors cause and large commercial communicators such as shown to be false by Shaefer et al. (1999), who these credibility problems? What are their con- the entertainment industry. Science communi- found that none of 403 evaluated newspaper sequences and how can they be reduced? It is cation is partly a political tool and the pressure articles on astronomy significantly mislead the the purpose of this exploratory study is to an- on the communicator to deliver is greater than reader. Furthermore, most errors in the evalu- swer these questions. ever. Due to the very nature of public com- ated articles could be attributed to the fact that munication, the temptation to overstate the im- they were reporting on front-line science, where The topic of astronomy was chosen partly for portance of scientific results or to take credit for no reliable conclusion has yet been reached. its inherent fascination for the public and partly more than is deserved is great. Two of the more Scientists and journalists can also have quite as it is a fundamental science — one where well known examples of credibility problems different perceptions of the term accuracy, and credibility issues do not involve risks to hu- within astronomy and physics are the “NASA thus “accuracy” for journalists is usually miss- man lives or substantial commercial interest Mars meteorite” case (Kiernan 2000) and the ing the required level of detail for scientists (Pe- as compared with fields such as health care “Cold fusion” case (Gregory and Miller 1998, ters 1995). (Madsen 2003). p. 61). Credibility in science communication is one This paper only examines the credibility of the The extent of the damage done to the public of the most actively discussed issues in sci- com munication of scientific results, and not the perception of science and scientists by exam- ence communication today: ‘How far can we, cre dibility of the actual scientific results them- ples like these is very difficult to measure. A in the name of science communication, keep selves. We thus assume that the peer-review recent public opinion survey (European Com- pushing, or promoting, our respective results or pro cess produces credible scientific results, mission, 2005) has shown that Europeans ge- projects without damaging our individual, and though some scholars question this claim ne rally see scientists as being credible and thus also our collective credibility?’ (Robson (Russell 1986, p. 93; Nelkin 1995, p. 150; Gre- having a positive impact on society. Journalists 2005, p. 162). As science communicator Rob- gory and Miller 1998, p. 168). The communi- scored poorly in the survey, but still much bet- ert Hurt states (interview 4): ‘In public affairs you cated scientific results, by their very nature as ter than politicians who were almost at the bot- are pulled between two poles: sensationalizing cut ting-edge information, may of course later tom of the scale. the results and correctness.’ However, serious be proved wrong, but this is how the scientific process works. The question whether the com- municated results are “true” to the actual scien- Method ring themes among the different actors tific results is here treated independently of the were found. intrinsic quality and scientific importance of the Eleven open-ended, in-depth interviews with results themselves. a semi-structured interview guide approach 5. Condensation of interviews to statements: (Kvale 1996, p. 129) were conducted with sci- Each interview was then further reduced ence communication actors2. The topics of the with the aid of the identified themes to a Study Design interviews were specified in advance, but the list of statements. This exploratory study was inspired by the sequence of the questions and responses from 6. Validation of statements: To ensure that the interviewees were not restricted to choices panel discussion, ‘Keeping our Credibility: the statements did not misrepresent the provided by the interviewers. Release of News’, held at the Communicating interviewee the statements were validat- Astronomy with the Public 2005 conference at ed against the recorded interviews. the European Southern Observatory in Munich The authors conducted eleven face-to-face in June 2005.1 interviews in person (one interview was con- 7. Approval of statements: Each list of state- ducted with two persons who are close collab- ments was sent to the interviewee for 3 We chose to examine the problem of cred- orators ) in Munich, Baltimore, New York and approval to validate the reduction proc- ibility in astronomical press releases from the Boston and one interview was conducted by ess described above and to give them a perspective of the actors in the science com- telephone. Each interview lasted approximately chance to comment. munication process: scientists, journalists and one hour and was recorded digitally with the public information officers at large governmen- verbal permission of the interviewee. tal and intergovernmental scientific organiza- Results tions. According to Madsen (2003) and sourc- Interviewees were chosen to match one of the es quoted therein, nearly 50% of all reported following profiles: Finding 1: Credibility is primarily defined science news in the media result directly from as being honest and doing your home- press releases, making this particular way of • Scientists closely relating to the work of pub- work. communicating science news very important. lic information officers, either as scientific Eleven out of twelve of the interviewees largely support in the development of press releas- defined credibility in science communication A qualitative rather than a quantitative approach es (outreach scientists) or as evaluators of as being honest and doing your homework was chosen because we, as in parallel studies the public information officers’ work. well. Interestingly, Heck (interview 3) defined (Treise and Weigold 2002), wanted to identify credibility as, ‘credibility occurs if the message and understand the issues as experienced by • Science journalists specializing in astrono- that you conveyed have been received credible the actors themselves. The qualitative ap- my. by the receiver’, which implies that the commu- proach allowed us to adapt to many kinds of • Public information officers from large gov- nicator is responsible for tailoring the message in such a way that it is well received. responses and to explore uncovered issues in ernmental scientific institutions. greater detail. Furthermore, we assumed that by conducting face-to-face interviews we could • Scientists who are otherwise deeply involved Hype and exaggeration was generally defined ask more penetrating questions on sensitive is- with science communication. by all interviewees as taking credit for more sues and so explore the more important issues than you deserve by overstating importance in greater detail. of science results e.g. by increasing visibility The public information officers and scientists overly. Care should be taken if the astronomy-related were selected from two of the largest govern- results presented here are used to draw broad- mental and intergovernmental astronomy re- Finding 2: Credibility issues are ubiquitous er conclusions about science communication search organizations in Europe and the United and integrated into the public information in general. However, this paper may serve as a States of America, namely the European South- officer (PIO)-Journalist interaction. basis for designing quantitative studies of the ern Observatory (ESO) and the National Aero- There is a general view that a certain amount credibility of general science communication. nautics and Space Administration (NASA). of exaggeration of scientific findings in press releases is necessary to reach the general pub- We followed seven steps in the analysis of the lic (science journalist Schilling, interview
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Future of Spaceimaging
    (NASA-CR-198818) THE FUTURE OF N95-31364 SPACE IMAGING. REPORT OF A COMMUNITY-BASED STUDY OF AN ADVANCED CAMERA FOR THE HUBBLE Unclas SPACE TELESCOPE Final Technical Report (Space Telescope Science Inst.) 150 p G3/89 0055789 TheFuture of SpaceImaging hen Lyman Spitzer first proposed a great, earth-orbiting telescope in I946, the nudear energy source of stars had been known for just six years. Knowledge of galaxies beyond our own and the understanding that our universe is expanding were only about twenty years of age in the human consciousness. The planet Pluto was seventeen. Quasars, black holes, gravitational lenses, and detection of the Big Bang were still in the future--together with much of what constitutes our current un- derstanding of the solar system and the cosmos beyond it. In I993, forty- seven years after it was conceived in a forgotten milieu of thought, the Hubble Space Telescope is a reality. Today, the science of the Hubble attests to the forward momentum of astronomical exploration from ancient times. The qualities of motion and drive for knowledge it exemplifies are not fixed in an epoch or a generation: most of the astronomers using Hubble today were not born when the idea of it was first advanced, and many were in the early stages of their education when the glass for its mirror was cast, The commitments we make today to the future of the Hubble observatory will equip a new genera- tion of young men and women to explore the astro- nomical frontier at the start of the 2I st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2011
    ESO European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere Annual Report 2011 ESO European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere Annual Report 2011 presented to the Council by the Director General Prof. Tim de Zeeuw The European Southern Observatory ESO, the European Southern Observa­ tory, is the foremost intergovernmental astronomy organisation in Europe. It ESO/J. PérezESO/J. is supported by 15 countries: Austria, Belgium, Brazil1, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Finland, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Several other countries have expressed an interest in membership. Created in 1962, ESO carries out an ambitious programme focused on the design, construction and operation of powerful ground­based observing facilities enabling astronomers to make important scientific discoveries. ESO also plays a leading role in promoting and organising cooperation in astro­ nomical research. ESO operates three unique world­class Star trails over ESO’s La Silla Observatory. observing sites in the Atacama Desert region of Chile: La Silla, Paranal and Chajnantor. ESO’s first site is at La Silla, a 2400­metre­high mountain 600 kilo­ in visible light, is the flagship facility of images of celestial objects as faint as metres north of Santiago de Chile. It is European astron omy. Paranal is situated magnitude 30 have been obtained in equipped with several optical telescopes about 130 kilo metres south of Antofagasta a one­hour exposure. This corresponds with mirror diameters of up to 3.6 metres. in Chile, 12 kilometres inland from the to seeing objects that are four billion Pacific coast in one of the driest areas in times fainter than those seen with the The 3.5­metre New Technology Tele­ the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 28 Space Telescope European Coordinating Facility
    January 2001 Number 28 Page 1 Number 28 January 2001 This 140 nm ultraviolet image of Jupiter was taken with the Hubble Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) on 26 November 1998 (Credit: NASA; ESA & John T. Clarke, Univ. of Michigan) when Jupiter was at a distance of 700 million km from Earth. In addition to the main auroral oval, centred on the magnetic north pole, and a pattern of more diffuse emission inside the polar cap, unique features are the ‘magnetic footprints’ of three of Jupiter’s satellites, Io, Ganymede and Europa. Space Telescope ST-ECF Newsletter ST-ECF European Coordinating Facility Page 2 ST–ECF Newsletter European news As the ESA contribution to HST moves away Group and, in September, by the Space Science Advisory from hardware provision, support for another Committee that NGST be selected as the next ‘Flexi-mission’ project has been agreed for the ST-ECF. in ESA’s future plan for implementation between 2008 and Following the successful provision of a 2013. This selection was endorsed by the Science Programme software package for extraction of NICMOS Committee at its meeting in October. grism spectra (NICMOSLook, see ST-ECF Newsletter 24, p. 7, This approval has allowed ESA to follow up the industry 1997), support for the spectroscopic modes of the ACS will studies it funded during 1999 with new investigations also be provided. ACS has both grisms and prisms: the Wide focussed on the specific European contributions to the Field Camera, with a coverage of 3.4' × 3.4', is fitted with a mission. In November, a study of the 1–5µm near-IR multi- grism offering 40Å/pixel resolution (5500–11000Å) over the object spectrograph to be provided by ESA was awarded to a full WFC field; the High resolution Camera (26'' × 29'') consortium headed by Astrium (Munich) and Laboratoire provides 30Å/pix grism spectra and prism spectra with a d’Astronomie Spatiale (Marseille).
    [Show full text]
  • Not Yet Imagined: a Study of Hubble Space Telescope Operations
    NOT YET IMAGINED A STUDY OF HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OPERATIONS CHRISTOPHER GAINOR NOT YET IMAGINED NOT YET IMAGINED A STUDY OF HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OPERATIONS CHRISTOPHER GAINOR National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Communications NASA History Division Washington, DC 20546 NASA SP-2020-4237 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Gainor, Christopher, author. | United States. NASA History Program Office, publisher. Title: Not Yet Imagined : A study of Hubble Space Telescope Operations / Christopher Gainor. Description: Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Communications, NASA History Division, [2020] | Series: NASA history series ; sp-2020-4237 | Includes bibliographical references and index. | Summary: “Dr. Christopher Gainor’s Not Yet Imagined documents the history of NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope (HST) from launch in 1990 through 2020. This is considered a follow-on book to Robert W. Smith’s The Space Telescope: A Study of NASA, Science, Technology, and Politics, which recorded the development history of HST. Dr. Gainor’s book will be suitable for a general audience, while also being scholarly. Highly visible interactions among the general public, astronomers, engineers, govern- ment officials, and members of Congress about HST’s servicing missions by Space Shuttle crews is a central theme of this history book. Beyond the glare of public attention, the evolution of HST becoming a model of supranational cooperation amongst scientists is a second central theme. Third, the decision-making behind the changes in Hubble’s instrument packages on servicing missions is chronicled, along with HST’s contributions to our knowledge about our solar system, our galaxy, and our universe.
    [Show full text]
  • The ESA–NASA Agreements on HST and NGST
    November 1998 Number 25 Page 1 Number 25 November 1998 Space Telescope European Coordinating Facility ST-ECF Newsletter Page 2 ST–ECF Newsletter Editorial rom the first issue in March 1985, the Editorial policy for ideally suited to this function and capable of transmitting Fthe ST-ECF Newsletter has been directed towards keeping information in formats not available on paper. Should the the community informed about the status of the HST project Web be our sole medium for informing our community? In and, in particular, about technical developments which spite of its convenience and flexibility, we think not. support the scientific use of the Observatory. Scientific results There is a clear need to inform about the HST in general were only reported when they illustrated the application of a and its evolution towards the Next Generation Space newly-developed technique or capability. The aim was to Telescope — a project which has gathered such enormous produce a publication which could be found open on the desk momentum during the last three of years. In particular, the of somebody writing an HST observing proposal or reducing European involvement in these Observatories has been under data. active negotiation, the results of which need to be We believe that this policy was correct and that the disseminated. Such topics are suited to a paper Newsletter Newsletter fulfilled this function. As an example, one could and that is one of our justifications for not succumbing point to the series of articles on image restoration — first entirely to the attractions of the WWW. triggered by the spherical aberration problem but later This new version of the ST-ECF Newsletter will appear developed into a broadly applicable suite of algorithms with twice a year, around May and November, and will be more application throughout astronomy and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hubble Data Archive
    A Recommendation by the Hubble Second Decade Committee: ve chi Ar a t a D e l b b u Toward the Ultimate H Union Archive of Astronomy e h T Space Telescope Science Institute 3700 San Martin Drive Baltimore, Maryland December 2000 The Hubble Archive 4 I ntroduction The archive of data from Hubble is undoubtedly the largest and most heavily used collection of pointed observations in astronomy today. Its volume, presently over 7 terabytes, is increasing at a rate of over 100 gigabytes per month. Meanwhile, the rate at which sci- entists withdraw data from the archive has swelled to about 15 giga- bytes per day, which is four times the ingest rate of new data from the telescope. The archive is moving to the center of the Hubble program. Its increasing volume and usage—as well as the new approaches to astronomy it empowers—assure its growing importance in Hubble’s second decade. In 2010, after the end of telescope opera- tions, Hubble research will become totally archival. At that time, the Hubble harvest will be viewed as several ‘crops’—published results, educated students, an informed public, and a wonderful archive of data and new modes of archival research. The new modes of research involve vast amounts of informa- tion, often located at different sites, being queried, correlated, downloaded over the Internet, and analyzed on desktop computers by astronomers around the world. Computer and communications technologies are advancing. The quality and consistency of astro- nomical data are increasing. Falling are the artificial barriers that once partitioned astronomy according to techniques and wave- length regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 26 June 1999 Page 1
    June 1999 Number 26 Page 1 Number 26 June 1999 This mosaic was created from the majority of the Hubble Deep Field South imaging data. All the flanking field images were included (9 for each camera) as well as the deep images of the three primary fields and the STIS-on-NICMOS additional exposures. Where there were multiple bands for the same fields these have been colour coded. This mosaic was assembled from the data products available from the Web (http://www.stsci.edu/ftp/science/hdfsouth/hdfs.html) at a scale of 0".25 arcsec/pixel using a revised version of the ‘Drizzle’ software. It is intended just to give a visual display of the data and certainly isn't suitable for scientific use. Space Telescope European Coordinating Facility ST-ECF Newsletter Page 2 ST–ECF Newsletter Next Generation Space Telescope — European news Peter Jakobsen (ESTEC) & Robert Fosbury n the previous issue of this Newsletter (No. 25, November is the so-called ‘F2’ mission in the Horizon 2000+ Programme. I1998), we outlined the European involvement in the NGST Hence NGST will have to compete with any other astronomy project and indicated what this should mean in practice for missions vying for this slot. The ‘Call for Ideas’ for the F2 European astronomers. The recent edition of ESA’s opportunity is presently expected to be released before the ASTRONEWS (No. 38, May1999) gives a current overview of end of this year with selection in June 2000. The next twelve the project and its science drivers and alerts us to the negotia- months will be a very intense period for the study teams, the tions planned for early next year between the three agencies, science teams and the project management but by this time NASA, ESA and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), which next year we will have a firmer picture of the likely capabili- will determine the nature of their hardware contributions to ties of the NGST observatory and ESA’s contributions to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008
    ESO European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere Annual Report 2008 presented to the Council by the Director General Prof. Tim de Zeeuw The European Southern Observatory ESO, the European Southern Observatory, is the foremost intergovernmental as­ tronomy organisation in Europe. It is sup­ ported by 14 countries: Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Finland, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Several other countries have expressed an interest in membership. Created in 1962, ESO carries out an am­ bitious programme focused on the de­ sign, construction and operation of pow­ erful ground­based observing facilities enabling astronomers to make important scientific discoveries. ESO also plays a leading role in promoting and organising cooperation in astronomical research. ESO operates three unique world­class observing sites in the Atacama Desert ESO’s first site at La Silla. region of Chile: La Silla, Paranal and Chajnantor. ESO’s first site is at La Silla, One of the most exciting features of the Each year, about 2000 proposals are a 2400 m high mountain 600 km north VLT is the option to use it as a giant opti­ made for the use of ESO telescopes, re­ of Santiago de Chile. It is equipped with cal interferometer (VLT Interferometer or questing between four and six times several optical telescopes with mirror VLTI). This is done by combining the light more nights than are available. ESO is the diameters of up to 3.6 metres. The from several of the telescopes, including most productive ground­based observa­ 3.5­metre New Technology Telescope one or more of four 1.8­metre moveable tory in the world, which annually results broke new ground for telescope engineer­ Auxiliary Telescopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycle 8 Approved Programs
    January 1999 • Volume 16, Number 1 SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Highlights of this Issue: • Hubble Heritage Project — page 19 • Starburst99 Synthesis Models — page 21 • The Last Days of NICMOS Newsletter — page 32 The PLANET Project: study of unseen lenses, stars and extra-solar planets through microlensing Kailash C. Sahu, STScI [email protected] he idea of microlensing is not The microlensing survey programs Cycle 8 new. More than half a century have an ‘Alert’ capability that has T ago, Einstein wrote a small opened the possibility of carrying out paper in Science where he did ‘a little independent follow-up study of the Who got time on HST to do what ... calculation’ at the request of R.W. microlensing events while the events Mandal, and showed that if a star are in progress. Now, at any given time How the selection process works ... happens to pass very close to another during the months when the Galactic star in the line of sight, then the Bulge is up in the sky, there are background star will be lensed. typically 10 or more microlensing A new RPS2 for Cycle 8 ... However, he also dismissed the idea as events in progress, so it is possible to only a theoretical exercise and even plan and dedicate some telescope A new Phase II ... remarked that there was ‘no hope of time to carry out such follow up observing such a phenomenon directly’ studies of the microlensing events. since the probability of observing is Approved less than one in a million. Science with microlensing Times have changed.
    [Show full text]