Modulation Dependent Carrier-Level control (MDCL)

Stephen S. Lockwood, P.E. Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers 9500 Greenwood, Ave, Seattle, WA [email protected]

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

1 Green Vs. Green

If it is not a good financial decision I seriously question if it is a good “green” decision NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

History

• Concepts date from 1930 • Renewed interest in late 1970-1980 when energy cost increased • Work done by: – British Corporation – Brown Boveri (BBC – ABB) – AEG-Telefunken • Systems currently implemented by: – North American Manufactures: Harris & Nautel – European Manufactures: Thomson, Transradio, Riz & Others

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

2 Energy Savings Methods • HaPuG – Harbich, Pungs & Gerth • Dependent Amplitude Modulation (DAM) • Dynamic Amplitude Carrier Modulation (DACM) • Dynamic Carrier Control (DCC) • Amplitude Modulation Companding (AMC) • Adaptive Carrier Control (ACC) • Dynamic Amplitude Modulation (DAM – again?) • Modulation Dependent Carrier-Level control (MDCL)

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

Variations on Two Methods

• Reduction of carrier level during lower modulation levels – DAM, DACM, ACC • Carrier is reduced at higher levels of modulation – AMC • DCC – has been used to describe both methods • Modulation Dependent Carrier-Level control (MDCL) for the generic description

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

3 Adaptive Carrier Control (ACC)

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

Amplitude Modulation Companding (AMC)

from Bell & Williams BBC

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

4 Transmitter Receiver Exciter AGC

Dynamic Range Not 120 dB for AM Likely 30-40 dB

Compression ~ 6 dB

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers Companding (Tomasi)

System Test • Both systems had extensive listening test in Europe in the 1980s – Subjective test by the BBC on AMC - “imperceptible” to most listeners – CCIR DAM had a “theoretical impairment” on the order of 1 dB • test have not produced any listener comments or noticeable signal quality changes

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

5 Current Use in Alaska

• Alaska Public Broadcasting – Chuck Lakaytis May 2008 – Funding for installation and testing – FCC Approval for Experimental Authorization – Tests on the first 2 stations showed 27% – 35% estimated savings (no separate transmitter power meter) – Installation now on 4 station with 5 this summer/fall with the rest next summer

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

Alaska Public Broadcasting 11 Very Rural AM Stations

KBRW-AM

KOTZ-AM

KIYU-AM KNSA-AM KZPA-AM

KYUK-AM KSKO-AM

KDLG-AM

KBBI-AM KCHU-FM KSDP-AM

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

6 Fuel and Transportation Costs:

• Cost up to $ 0.50 per kWh

• For 9 of 11 stations diesel fuel delivery is via barge or aircraft.

• Due to shipping company fuel charges, cost have increased 40 %

• Current diesel fuel price ~ $7.00/gallon, delivered.

• 2010 transmitter energy bills range from $20,000 to $60,000

• No relief in site for these increases.

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

Regulatory Consideration

• 47 CFR §73.1560 Operating Power and Mode Tolerance – 90% to 105% – Historically a concern about not fully serving coverage area and devices operating outside designed power range and producing spurious emissions • STA for Alaska Public Stations • FCC Public Notice DA 11-1535 authorizing use released 12 Sep 2011 – Method agnostic – Allowing “enlightened self-interest” to give operators freedom to find what is acceptable in the power savings vs. quality trade-off

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

7 NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

FCC Requirements

• A letter to the FCC requesting waiver of Section 73.1560(a) • Still operate at licensed power when MDCL is disabled • Disable MDCL when asked to accommodate field strength measurements • Or you can ask for an experimental authorization should you wish

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

8 Installation

• Harris has an additional circuit board that is installed in DX & 3DX transmitters from power levels of 10 kW and higher. • Nautel has an additional circuit board card or it built into an exciter replacement • Both systems relatively straight forward installation process – talk to Harris & Nautel about price – but payback it quick!

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

Compatibility with IBOC

• Test from both Nautel and Harris have demonstrated that it can be used with IBOC • IBOC Carriers are lower power (-28 dBc) and remain unaffected by the analog signal • Some concern about variability in AM IBOC receivers – need some testing?

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

9 Modulation Monitors

• Not required by FCC • Oscilloscope always works • Reportedly most existing units work with companding methods • Belar AMMA-2 a DPS based modulation monitor is designed to accommodate MDCL

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

Projected Cost Savings

• For 50 kW transmitters: – $0.10 per kWh - k$ 19.2 per year – $0.15 per kWh - k$ 28.2 per year • For 10 kW transmitters: – $0.10 per kWh - k$ 3.9 per year – $0.15 per kWh - k$ 5.9 per year

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

10 Acknowledgments • Chuck Lakaytis – APB • Pierre Lonewolf – KOTZ, Kotzebue, Alaska • Tim Hardy – Nautel • Geoff Mendenhall & Terry Cockerill - Harris • Ann Gallagher & Susan Crawford - FCC Audio Division • Ben Dawson & Ron Rackley

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

References

• Bell, C.P. and Williams, W.F.; Implementation of Amplitude Modulation Companding in the BBC MF National Networks; IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting; Vol. 35, No. 2, June 1989 • Hardy, Tim; Energy Conservation in AM Broadcast Transmitters Using Carrier Control Algorithms; Nautel; NAB Show April 2009 • Harris Corporation; Adaptive Carrier Control for DX Transmitters; Sales Brochure • Harris Corporation; Harris ACC Technical Manual 8882509002; Aug 2009 • Lakaytis, Charles; Reducing Costs at AM Transmitters Using Carrier Control Techniques; NAB Show April 2010 • Nautel, Installation and Operation Instructions, Dynamic Carrier Control PWB, NAPX05E/02 • Manson, W.I. ;Amplitude modulation : application of companding techniques to the radiated signal; BBC Research Department Report No. BBC RD 1985/13., 1985 • Petke, G. and Mielke, J.; Energy Conservation and Reception Quality for Dynamic Amplitude Modulation; Institute of Radio Technology Report Number 22/80, 7 August 1980. • Rudolf, Prof. Dr.Dietmar; AM-Modulatoren; Die Technik der Amplituden-Modulatoren; RM.org; 15 Dec 2009 • Schminke, Dr. Wolfram and Boksberger, Hans-Ulrich; Dynamic Carrier Control; DCC, a Valuable Method to Save Input Power of Medium Wave Transmitters; IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Vol. 35, No.2, June 1989 • Schminke, Dr. Wolfram; Dynamic Carrier Control; The Merits of Modern Technology for Today’s High Power Short-Wave Transmitters; IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Vol. 34, No.2, June 1988 • CCIR; Report 1060, Energy Saving Methods in Amplitude Modulation Broadcast Transmitters and Their Influence on Reception Quality; Rec. 205, 1982 • Wood, James; Energy Saving for Transmitters; International Broadcasting, October 1987 • Wood, James; Megawatt Misers; International Broadcasting • Woodard, George, AM Transmitters NAB Engineering Handbook, 7th Edition, 1985

NAB Fall Radio Show 2011 Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers

11