DOCSLIB.ORG

Attachment 6 Cover Page

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ATTACHMENT 6 COVER PAGE Attachment ID Attachment Title Attachment 6 Coondoo Creek Ecological Study 2012. Department of Transport and Main Roads Coondoo Creek Bridge Replacement Job Number 261-41a-800 Ecological Study April 2012 This Report for Coondoo Creek Ecological Study (“Report”): 1. has been prepared by GHD Pty Ltd (“GHD”) for the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR); 2. may only be used and relied on by the DTMR; 3. must not be copied to, used by, or relied on by any person other than the DTMR without the prior written consent of GHD; 4. may only be used for the purpose of providing baseline ecological data for the study site (and must not be used for any other purpose). GHD and its servants, employees and officers otherwise expressly disclaim responsibility to any person other than the Department of Transport and Main Roads arising from or in connection with this Report. To the maximum extent permitted by law, all implied warranties and conditions in relation to the services provided by GHD and the Report are excluded unless they are expressly stated to apply in this Report. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this Report: x were limited to those specifically detailed in section 1 of this Report; x did not include any RE verification or vegetation mapping, impact studies, reporting or species management plans or consideration of environmental aspects other than those specified in the scope; and x did not include any terrestrial fauna monitoring (i.e. call playback or trapping). The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on assumptions made by GHD when undertaking services and preparing the Report (“Assumptions”), including (but not limited to): x the background data provided by DTMR was accurate at the time of submission. GHD expressly disclaims responsibility for any error in, or omission from, this Report arising from or in connection with any of the Assumptions being incorrect. Subject to the paragraphs in this section of the Report, the opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the time of preparation and may be relied on for a period of 6 months, after which time, GHD expressly disclaims responsibility for any error in, or omission from, this Report arising from or in connection with those opinions, conclusions and any recommendations. 41/24808/15161 Coondoo Creek Bridge Replacement Job Number 261-41a-800 Ecological Study Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Study Area 1 1.3 Purpose 1 2. Methodology 3 2.1 Terrestrial and Aquatic Flora 3 2.2 Terrestrial Fauna Survey and Terrestrial Habitat Assessment 3 3. Survey Results 5 3.1 Terrestrial and Aquatic Flora 5 3.2 Terrestrial Fauna 8 4. References 21 Table Index Table 1 Threatened species assessment for the Coondoo Bridge replacement on Tin Can Bay Road. 8 Table 2 Habitat Characteristics 13 Figure Index Figure 1 Study Area 2 Figure 2 Macrozamia pauli-guilielmi individuals at two separate locations 6 Figure 3 Environmental Factors Map 7 Figure 4 Habitat tress identified within disturbance zone. 18 Figure 5 Field Observations Map 19 Appendices A Flora Species List B Macrozamia pauli-guilielmi Locations 41/24808/15161 Coondoo Creek Bridge Replacement Job Number 261-41a-800 Ecological Study 1. Introduction 1.1 Background The Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR) engaged the services of GHD to undertake an ecological survey for the proposed construction of a new bridge and approaches at Coondoo Creek on the Tin Can Bay Road (Chainage 34.10 km – 34.63 km) between Gympie and Tin Can Bay. During bridge replacement works, a sidetrack is proposed to be constructed adjacent to the existing road formation in order to divert traffic away from the construction area. A depiction of the study area has been included in Figure 1. 1.2 Study Area Field surveys extended approximately 100 m upstream and 100 m downstream of the existing Coondoo bridge on both the northern and southern banks. As Figure 1 demonstrates the study area also extended to the north and south of the existing bridge to include vegetation within the road reserve which is expected to be disturbed as a result of the works. Cadastral information for this area indicates that Toolara State Forest borders this section of Tin Can Bay Road on both the eastern and western side (DERM, 2009). Toolara State Forest is an extensive exotic Pinus plantation which supplies timber for house framing, flooring, mouldings, beams, plywood, medium density fibreborads, paper and landscaping (FPQ, 2011). 1.3 Purpose The purpose of the ecological survey was to identify flora and fauna species present within the study area and to assess the potential for habitat types present to support EVNT (endangered, vulnerable, near threatened) species. 41/24808/15161 Coondoo Creek Bridge Replacement Job Number 261-41a-800 1 Ecological Study Figure 1 Study Area 41/24808/15161 Coondoo Creek Bridge Replacement Job Number 261-41a-800 2 Ecological Study 2. Methodology 2.1 Terrestrial and Aquatic Flora 2.1.1 Desktop Investigations Database search results and other relevant information were reviewed in order to guide the targeted flora surveys for threatened plant species. The following desktop databases were searched for the Project area: The Commonwealth Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) Protected Matters database for matters of National Environmental Significance (NES); The Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM) Wildnet database for previous records of flora species; and The Queensland Herbarium’s Certified Regional Ecosystem (RE) Mapping (Version 6.0), Essential Habitat Mapping (Version 3), Regulated Regrowth Mapping (Version 2.0), and RE Description Database for areas and descriptions of mapped remnant or regrowth communities. 2.1.2 Field Survey A one day field assessment was conducted by GHD’s qualified ecologists on 28 March 2012. The flora survey involved undertaking a walking traverse of the study area and its immediate surrounds in order to: generate an inventory of vascular plant species present (native and introduced) within the disturbance footprint; identify weed species present within the works area; and record locations of any A Class Restricted Plants observed within the study area. Targeted searches for Commonwealth and State listed conservation significant flora species based on preferred habitats and known distributions were also undertaken. 2.2 Terrestrial Fauna Survey and Terrestrial Habitat Assessment 2.2.1 Desktop investigations A desktop search was conducted to document previous records of fauna within the area, identify mapped sensitive areas and to determine species specific habitat requirements for species that may occur. The following literature/desktop databases were searched for the Project area: The Commonwealth EPBC Act Protected Matters database to identify matters of NES; The Queensland DERM Wildlife Online database for previous records of fauna species; and Existing ecological reports for the Project area supplied by DTMR. Terrestrial fauna species identified as potentially occurring within the Project area were assessed for their likelihood to occur within the study area. The results from the assessment have been included in section 3.2.1 of this report. 41/24808/15161 Coondoo Creek Bridge Replacement Job Number 261-41a-800 3 Ecological Study 2.2.2 Field survey A one day field assessment was conducted by GHD’s ecologists in conjunction with the flora survey on 28 March 2012. The objective of the field survey was to identify and characterise the terrestrial fauna habitat values relevant to the study area and to ground-truth results from the literature review and desktop assessment. The terrestrial field survey involved a combination of habitat assessments and active searching for terrestrial fauna species. The following information was recorded during habitat assessments: The structural complexity and type of riparian vegetation; Canopy species overhanging watercourses; The nature and likely hydroperiod of surface water; Habitat features (i.e. hollows, fallen logs, water bodies); Wildlife traces (i.e. diggings, burrows, scratches and nests); Spatial criteria (i.e. remnant size, fragmentation and connectivity); and Sources of existing disturbance. Active search techniques were used throughout the field assessment and more specifically at each of the habitat assessment sites. Active searches or opportunistic observations were performed for approximately 5 – 10 minutes at each site. Active searching involves looking for terrestrial fauna around the base of reeds, under leaf litter, underneath rocks, behind defoliating bark and within trees. The terrestrial fauna assessment did not include any aquatic habitat surveys. A freshwater aquatic assessment of the study area was undertaken by Central Queensland University in 2011 (Wormington and Black 2011). 41/24808/15161 Coondoo Creek Bridge Replacement Job Number 261-41a-800 4 Ecological Study 3. Survey Results 3.1 Terrestrial and Aquatic Flora 3.1.1 Desktop results Search results of the EPBC Protected Matters database for the Project area indicated that the following eight threatened flora species may potentially occur in the area: Baloghia marmorata (jointed Baloghia) – vulnerable; Bosistoa selwynii (heart leaved Bosistoa) – vulnerable; Bosistoa transversa (three-leaved Bosistoa) – vulnerable; Cryptocarya foetida (stinking
Recommended publications
  • 24. Tribe PANICEAE 黍族 Shu Zu Chen Shouliang (陈守良); Sylvia M

    24. Tribe PANICEAE 黍族 Shu Zu Chen Shouliang (陈守良); Sylvia M

    POACEAE 499 hairs, midvein scabrous, apex obtuse, clearly demarcated from mm wide, glabrous, margins spiny-scabrous or loosely ciliate awn; awn 1–1.5 cm; lemma 0.5–1 mm. Anthers ca. 0.3 mm. near base; ligule ca. 0.5 mm. Inflorescence up to 20 cm; spike- Caryopsis terete, narrowly ellipsoid, 1–1.8 mm. lets usually densely arranged, ascending or horizontally spread- ing; rachis scabrous. Spikelets 1.5–2.5 mm (excluding awns); Stream banks, roadsides, other weedy places, on sandy soil. Guangdong, Hainan, Shandong, Taiwan, Yunnan [Bhutan, Cambodia, basal callus 0.1–0.2 mm, obtuse; glumes narrowly lanceolate, India, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, Philippines, Sri back scaberulous-hirtellous in rather indistinct close rows (most Lanka, Thailand, Vietnam; Africa (probably introduced), Australia obvious toward lemma base), midvein pectinate-ciliolate, apex (Queensland)]. abruptly acute, clearly demarcated from awn; awn 0.5–1.5 cm. Anthers ca. 0.3 mm. Caryopsis terete, narrowly ellipsoid, ca. 3. Perotis hordeiformis Nees in Hooker & Arnott, Bot. Beech- 1.5 mm. Fl. and fr. summer and autumn. 2n = 40. ey Voy. 248. 1838. Sandy places, along seashores. Guangdong, Hebei, Jiangsu, 麦穗茅根 mai sui mao gen Yunnan [India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Nepal, Myanmar, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Thailand]. Perotis chinensis Gandoger. This species is very close to Perotis indica and is sometimes in- Annual or short-lived perennial. Culms loosely tufted, cluded within it. No single character by itself is reliable for separating erect or decumbent at base, 25–40 cm tall. Leaf sheaths gla- the two, but the combination of characters given in the key will usually brous; leaf blades lanceolate to narrowly ovate, 2–4 cm, 4–7 suffice.
  • Take Another Look

    Take Another Look

    Take Contact Details Another SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL Caloundra Customer Service Look..... 1 Omrah Avenue, Caloundra FRONT p: 07 5420 8200 e: [email protected] Maroochydore Customer Service 11-13 Ocean Street, Maroochydore p: 07 5475 8501 e: [email protected] Nambour Customer Service Cnr Currie & Bury Street, Nambour p: 07 5475 8501 e: [email protected] Tewantin Customer Service 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin p: 07 5449 5200 e: [email protected] YOUR LOCAL CONTACT Our Locals are Beauties HINTERLAND EDITION HINTERLAND EDITION 0 Local native plant guide 2 What you grow in your garden can have major impact, Introduction 3 for better or worse, on the biodiversity of the Sunshine Native plants 4 - 41 Coast. Growing a variety of native plants on your property can help to attract a wide range of beautiful Wildlife Gardening 20 - 21 native birds and animals. Native plants provide food and Introduction Conservation Partnerships 31 shelter for wildlife, help to conserve local species and Table of Contents Table Environmental weeds 42 - 73 enable birds and animals to move through the landscape. Method of removal 43 Choosing species which flower and fruit in different Succulent plants and cacti 62 seasons, produce different types of fruit and provide Water weeds 70 - 71 roost or shelter sites for birds, frogs and lizards can greatly increase your garden’s real estate value for native References and further reading 74 fauna. You and your family will benefit from the natural pest control, life and colour that these residents and PLANT TYPE ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS visitors provide – free of charge! Habitat for native frogs Tall Palm/Treefern Local native plants also improve our quality of life in Attracts native insects other ways.
  • Morphological Study on Nine Species of the Family Poaceae from Some Area of East Bago Region

    Morphological Study on Nine Species of the Family Poaceae from Some Area of East Bago Region

    Bago University Research Journal, 2018, Vol. 8, No. 1 Morphological Study on Nine Species of the Family Poaceae from Some Area of East Bago Region Ni Ni Aye* Abstract Poaceae is widely distributed family among the angiosperms. In these results, tribe Paniceae comprises 9 speeies and 7 genera of sub- family Panicoideae were collected in some area of East Bago Region. The morphological study on 9 species, 7 genera of sub- family Panicoideae are presented. Taxonomy descriptions are accompanied by the photographs of habits, ligules, inflorescences, spikelets and parts of the florets. Keywords: Poaceae, East Bago Area Introduction All grasses belong to the family Poaceae (Gramineae) of order Poales. Presently there are about 780 genera and 12,000 species of grasses on the world and grass dominated ecosystem, including tropical and sub- tropical savannah, temperate grassland and steppe cover more than 30% of earth land surface (willis, 2002). Poaceae are the fifth largest plant family (ESEAP Conference, 2018) in Myanmar, Poaceae is represented by 144 genera and 551 species according to Hundley and Chit Ko Ko, 1987. The appearance of grasses during the late cretaceous and early tertiary also represent the earliest fossil evidence for wind- pollinated herbaceous monocotyledons. Most of grasses are very important economically and ecologically. In this present study, grasses from some area of East Bago Region. In this research presented the subfamily Panicoideae of family Poaceae are classified accordance with Hafliger and Scholz’s classification (1981). 9 species and 7 genera were included in tribe Paniceae. Most genera of this tribe are well adaptation on land and aquatic habitats.
  • Brisbane Native Plants by Suburb

    Brisbane Native Plants by Suburb

    INDEX - BRISBANE SUBURBS SPECIES LIST Acacia Ridge. ...........15 Chelmer ...................14 Hamilton. .................10 Mayne. .................25 Pullenvale............... 22 Toowong ....................46 Albion .......................25 Chermside West .11 Hawthorne................. 7 McDowall. ..............6 Torwood .....................47 Alderley ....................45 Clayfield ..................14 Heathwood.... 34. Meeandah.............. 2 Queensport ............32 Trinder Park ...............32 Algester.................... 15 Coopers Plains........32 Hemmant. .................32 Merthyr .................7 Annerley ...................32 Coorparoo ................3 Hendra. .................10 Middle Park .........19 Rainworth. ..............47 Underwood. ................41 Anstead ....................17 Corinda. ..................14 Herston ....................5 Milton ...................46 Ransome. ................32 Upper Brookfield .......23 Archerfield ...............32 Highgate Hill. ........43 Mitchelton ...........45 Red Hill.................... 43 Upper Mt gravatt. .......15 Ascot. .......................36 Darra .......................33 Hill End ..................45 Moggill. .................20 Richlands ................34 Ashgrove. ................26 Deagon ....................2 Holland Park........... 3 Moorooka. ............32 River Hills................ 19 Virginia ........................31 Aspley ......................31 Doboy ......................2 Morningside. .........3 Robertson ................42 Auchenflower
  • Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description

    Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description

    Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description 2010 Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this ECD are correct, the Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Department of the Environment does not guarantee and accepts no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to the currency, accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the information in this ECD. Note: There may be differences in the type of information contained in this ECD publication, to those of other Ramsar wetlands. © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2010. The ‘Ecological Character Description for the Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site: Final Report’ is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This report should be attributed as ‘BMT WBM. (2010). Ecological Character Description of the Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site. Prepared for the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts.’ The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Ecological Character Description for the Shoalwater and
  • Bitou Bush Control (After Fire) in Bundjalung National

    Bitou Bush Control (After Fire) in Bundjalung National

    emr_262.fm Page 79 Wednesday, June 28, 2006 1:22 PM doi: 10.1111/j1442-8903.2006.00262.x FEATURE BlackwellBitou Publishing Asia Bush control (after fire) in Bundjalung National Park on the New South Wales North Coast By Jeff Thomas, Damien Hofmeyer and Andrew S. Benwell Bitou Bush has already invaded extensive coastal dunes in subtropical and temperate eastern Australia. Can it be treated at a large enough scale to make a difference? Results to date of a targeted aerial spraying program (applied after wildfire at Bundjalung National Park) are showing strong recovery of high conservation value dunal vegetation along 35 km of the northern New South Wales coastline. Figure 1. Prior to 2002 about 75% of the foredunes in Bundjalung National Park contained heavy infestations of Bitou Bush (the lighter-coloured vegetation visible along the coast). This is just Jeff Thomas (North Coast Region, PO Box 361, a portion of the approximately 900 km of the New South Wales coastline (80% of the coast) already Grafton, NSW 2460, Australia. Tel. 02 66 411506. infested by Bitou Bush. Without successful control, this nationally declared environmental weed is E-mail: [email protected]) is considered to have potential to expand its range across a much larger area of the Australian Pest Management Officer and Damien Hofmeyer coastline. (Photo: Department of Environment and Conservation) (Richmond River Area, PO Box 856, Alstonville, NSW 2477, Australia. Tel. 02 6627 0221. Email: [email protected]) is a Introduction (Box 1 and Fig. 2) had shown that in Ranger at the Parks and Wildlife Division of the 2002, about 75% of the foredunes in the Department of Environment and Conservation ver the Christmas and New Year park contained heavy infestations (i.e.
  • Newsletter Number 57

    Newsletter Number 57

    ASSOCIATION OF SOCIETIES FOR GROWING AUSTRALIAN PLANTS. AUSTRALIAN FOOD PLANTS STUDY GROUP. ISSN O811 5362. ______________________________________________________________________ NEWSLETTER NUMBER 57. DECEMBER 2009. ______________________________________________________________________ 323 Philp Ave Frenchville Qld. 4701 12/12/2009 Dear Members and subscribers, Another ANPSA (formerly ASGAP) biennial conference and seminar has come and gone - the latest in Victoria at Geelong. I haven't heard anything much from this one yet, as no-one from Rockhampton attended, but I'm looking forward to reading the paper on bush foods that was presented by Dr Beth Gott. However, I also need to pass on the information that Philip Robinson has stepped down as ANPSA Study Group Co-ordinator to undertake other roles within APS Victoria, and the new Co-ordinator is Geoff Lay, Vice President of APS Maroondah, also in Victoria. We sincerely thank Philip for his work and assistance over recent years, and wish him well in his future endeavours. Also from the Conference comes the news of the passing of New South Wales APS stalwart Lyn Thompson after a short illness. Lyn was NSW Study Group Liaison Officer, and I knew her personally through attendance at many past conferences, as well as in our "official" capacities. She will be greatly missed. On the local front, the major concern has been the prolonged dry after reasonable falls in early summer twelve months ago. As we haven’t received a drop since, the countryside is looking very sad, and the town itself resembles a brown wasteland rather than the tropical green oasis of former years. The only green visible in the Berserkers (the mountains which form the backdrop to the city, separating it from the coast) are the pockets of Vine Scrub in the steeper gullies and along the creeks, as the rest of the vegetation (open grassy woodland) burnt to bare earth in the October fires, the worst in recorded history.
  • (Poaceae: Panicoideae) in Thailand

    (Poaceae: Panicoideae) in Thailand

    Systematics of Arundinelleae and Andropogoneae, subtribes Chionachninae, Dimeriinae and Germainiinae (Poaceae: Panicoideae) in Thailand Thesis submitted to the University of Dublin, Trinity College for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) by Atchara Teerawatananon 2009 Research conducted under the supervision of Dr. Trevor R. Hodkinson School of Natural Sciences Department of Botany Trinity College University of Dublin, Ireland I Declaration I hereby declare that the contents of this thesis are entirely my own work (except where otherwise stated) and that it has not been previously submitted as an exercise for a degree to this or any other university. I agree that library of the University of Dublin, Trinity College may lend or copy this thesis subject to the source being acknowledged. _______________________ Atchara Teerawatananon II Abstract This thesis has provided a comprehensive taxonomic account of tribe Arundinelleae, and subtribes Chionachninae, Dimeriinae and Germainiinae of the tribe Andropogoneae in Thailand. Complete floristic treatments of these taxa have been completed for the Flora of Thailand project. Keys to genera and species, species descriptions, synonyms, typifications, illustrations, distribution maps and lists of specimens examined, are also presented. Fourteen species and three genera of tribe Arundinelleae, three species and two genera of subtribe Chionachninae, seven species of subtribe Dimeriinae, and twelve species and two genera of Germainiinae, were recorded in Thailand, of which Garnotia ciliata and Jansenella griffithiana were recorded for the first time for Thailand. Three endemic grasses, Arundinella kerrii, A. kokutensis and Dimeria kerrii were described as new species to science. Phylogenetic relationships among major subfamilies in Poaceae and among major tribes within Panicoideae were evaluated using parsimony analysis of plastid DNA regions, trnL-F and atpB- rbcL, and a nuclear ribosomal DNA region, ITS.
  • Species Selection Guidelines Tree Species Selection

    Species Selection Guidelines Tree Species Selection

    Species selection guidelines Tree species selection This section of the plan provides guidance around the selection of species for use as street trees in the Sunshine Coast Council area and includes region-wide street tree palettes for specific functions and settings. More specific guidance on signature and natural character palettes and lists of trees suitable for use in residential streets for each of the region's 27 Local plan areas are contained within Part B – Street tree strategies of the plan. Street tree palettes will be periodically reviewed as an outcome of street tree trials, the development of new species varieties and cultivars, or the advent of new pest or disease threats that may alter the performance and reliability of currently listed species. The plan is to be used in association with the Sunshine Coast Council Open Space Landscape Infrastructure Manual where guidance for tree stock selection (in line with AS 2303–2018 Tree stock for landscape use) and tree planting and maintenance specifications can be found. For standard advanced tree planting detail, maintenance specifications and guidelines for the selection of tree stock see also the Sunshine Coast Open Space Landscape Infrastructure Manual – Embellishments – Planting Landscape). The manual's Plant Index contains a comprehensive list of all plant species deemed suitable for cultivation in Sunshine Coast amenity landscapes. For specific species information including expected dimensions and preferred growing conditions see Palettes – Planting – Planting index). 94 Sunshine Coast Street Tree Master Plan 2018 Part A Tree nomenclature Strategic outcomes The names of trees in this document follow the • Trees are selected by suitably qualified and International code of botanical nomenclature experienced practitioners (2012) with genus and species given, followed • Tree selection is locally responsive and by the plant's common name.
  • Fitzroy, Queensland

    Fitzroy, Queensland

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.

  • Native Plants

    Fourth Native Tall Palm / Tree Fern Table oF CoNTeNTs local native plant guide 2 Introduction 3 Native plants description 4-32 Community Nature Conservation 33 environmental weeds 34 Weed Identification guide 35 Methods of removal 36 environmental weed description 37-58 References and further reading 59 Further assistance 60 Plant Type Environmental Benefits Tree palm/Treefern Habitat for native frogs Attracts native tree Tree dwelling mammals Attracts native insects Shrub Attracts native birds Groundcover Suitable for planting near powerlines Grass & tussock Indigenous use plants Vine 2 local Natives INTRoduCTIoN local native plants have evolved over thousands of years to thrive in our sandy, salty and windy conditions. They play a crucial role in protecting our sand dunes and coastal areas from erosion by wind and water. Wallum, the coastal heathland plants native to this area, are just as important as a tropical rainforest, and act in much the same way, protecting everything beneath an impenetrable canopy and providing food and shelter for our native birds and animals. The local aborigines and early settlers also relied on these valuable plants, which supplied them with foods, medicines, dyes and materials. over the last 150 years, the sunshine Coast has lost much of its coastal vegetation leaving small isolated pockets scattered across the region. every day more and more of our iconic coastal plants are disappearing due to increasing pressures placed upon them by our lifestyle choices. as a result the remaining isolated pockets of coastal vegetation are being overrun by introduced weeds. We need to protect and repair the few remaining areas of local native plants, and introduce more native plants into our backyards.
  • Biodiversity Summary: Burnett Mary, Queensland

    Biodiversity Summary: Burnett Mary, Queensland

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.