DOCSLIB.ORG

National Strategic Harvest Management Plan 2 Mourning Dove National Strategic Harvest Management Plan INTRODUCTION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Strategic Harvest Management Plan 2 Mourning Dove National Strategic Harvest Management Plan INTRODUCTION U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Mourning Dove National Strategic Harvest Management Plan 2 Mourning Dove National Strategic Harvest Management Plan INTRODUCTION This document provides a long- to make harvest management U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service range vision for improving mourning decisions; (2) population survey (FWS) notified the dove technical dove management through the results indicating declines; and, (3) committees in the CMU and the development of predictive harvest uncertainty regarding the cause of Eastern Management Unit (EMU) strategies. The purposes of this population declines. Some managers that if downward population trends plan are to: (1) promote the concept believe that hunting opportunity continued, harvest framework of coordinated management of should be commensurate with reductions would be implemented. mourning doves to insure uniformity population status while others Furthermore, they asked that of regulatory action and equitable believe that a restriction on hunting harvest management strategies be conservation across the species opportunity is unnecessary when developed that included decision range in the 3 Mourning Dove harvest is not known to be the criteria that explicitly state when Management Units; (2) acknowledge causative factor of a decline. regulatory changes will be made the need to recognize demographic and what the changes would be, differences among management The inability to correlate mourning and an estimate of the effect of units; and, (3) acknowledge that dove hunting regulations with their the regulatory options. In 1999, a the current harvest management impact on demographic parameters workshop was held in the CMU to system, and the knowledge base has not been considered a problem attempt to improve upon the harvest supporting it, needs improvement. heretofore because mourning doves management decision-making Future recommendations will be are widely distributed, abundant, process. In 2000, a Joint Flyway made regarding management and adaptable to a variety of recommendation was approved unit-specific harvest strategies habitats. Additionally, trends in to support establishing a working and initiation of new, long-term population indices in past years were group composed of representatives monitoring efforts. relatively stable and the estimated from the FWS and the flyway total harvest was declining. In councils, i.e., their technical Management has consisted of annual recent years, declines in the long- committees, to develop acceptable population trend surveys and the term population index have become guidelines for management unit establishment of annual hunting apparent in all 3 management plans, i.e., harvest management regulations. Additionally, some units. In the WMU, the decline was objectives and strategies. Similar states conducted either annual or generally considered the result of recommendations have been made periodic harvest surveys. These long-term habitat changes (Reeves by the Central Flyway Council and survey and harvest data, however, et al. 1993). However, it is difficult the Migratory Shore and Upland did not give managers the ability to to pinpoint exact causes of declines. Game Bird Working Group of the either correlate or predict the impact A combination of factors involving International Association of Fish and of regulation changes on harvest both reproduction and survival is Wildlife Agencies. or population levels. For example, likely responsible. Since mourning hunting opportunity was restricted doves are habitat generalists, it is In 2001, a National Mourning in the Western Management Unit difficult to target and develop habitat Dove Planning Committee was (WMU) beginning in 1987 due to management programs. Thus, the formed and met to begin the long-term dove population declines. future of dove management depends process of developing a plan of The dove population in the WMU primarily upon harvest management action that would lead to guidelines appears to have stabilized, but and our understanding of how the management unit technical it is unlikely that hunting was harvest affects dove populations. committees could use to prepare solely responsible for the decline Consequently, this plan deals with management plans for their that prompted these restrictions. harvest management rather than respective management units. Todd Unfortunately, available data were habitat issues. Sanders (CO) represented the insufficient to allow managers to WMU; Jay Roberson (TX) and John relate demographic parameters to Increasingly, there has been broad- H. Schulz (MO) represented the harvest or hunting regulations. scale support for improving the way CMU; Tommy Hines (FL) and David dove harvest is addressed. Harvest Scott (OH) represented the EMU; Managers have increasingly management plans have been David Otis represented USGS; and, become concerned about the status prepared in both the WMU and the David Dolton represented the FWS. of mourning dove populations Central Management Unit (CMU), Mike Rabe (AZ) joined the group in given their economic and social but neither plan provided a clear 2002 as a second representative from importance, and apparent population decision-making process regarding the WMU. declines. Management concerns hunting regulations. In 1998, the include: (1) limited data upon which Mourning Dove National Strategic Harvest Management Plan 3 The Planning Committee concluded that the current harvest management decision-making process could not be improved with existing information. Consequently, the group decided to prepare this simple vision document that would provide a long-range strategy for improving mourning dove harvest management. This Plan is expected to provide a common philosophy and framework that will result in (1) development of predictive harvest strategies that may be incorporated into unit-specific management plans, and (2) recommendations regarding initiation of new, long-term monitoring efforts. This Plan focuses on concepts rather than specific details, and represents an initial step towards improving the decision-making process in establishing mourning dove harvest regulations. The document outline consists of 4 questions: 1. Where are we currently with our mourning dove management? (Where are we?) 2. Where do we envision the future of mourning dove harvest management? (Where do we want to be?) 3. How will we get to this desired future condition? (How will we get there?) 4. How will we know if we met our goal? (Did we make it?) George Andrejko / Arizona Game & Fish Department 4 Mourning Dove National Strategic Harvest Management Plan Where Are We? Current State of Management “. Federal and State hunting regulations have been based upon the best information available . [but the] information on which to base management [decisions] has been far from complete. Although much was known about the dove’s life history, there has been [a] need for information on populations and production, migration, and local movements, on the influence of changing land use and weather, and on the effects of hunting” (Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners 1957:1). Since the time of this statement, a large body of research has been conducted on mourning doves (Baskett et al. 1993) and much has been learned (Tomlinson et al. 1994, Mirarchi and Baskett 1994). Despite the extensive and voluminous nature Jim Matthews of information gathered, the basic question of how harvest affects survival and reproductive rates remains unanswered. Many causative factors have con- tributed to our inability to address basic questions related to mourning dove harvest management. Mourn- ing doves are ubiquitous habitat generalists that use almost every major ecological habitat type (Al- drich and Duvall 1958). Mourning doves are also relatively numerous and visible compared to other avian species (Robbins et al. 1986, Tom- linson and Dolton 1987), and this relative abundance has minimized concerns about possible effects of over-harvest. Historically, few data existed to provide the rationale for Jim Rathert / Missouri Department of Conservation changing mourning dove hunting season frameworks; e.g., Mourn- ing Dove Call-count Survey (CCS) population trends, individual state harvest estimates [prior to full im- plementation of the Harvest Infor- mation Program (HIP)], and expert Mourning Dove National Strategic Harvest Management Plan 5 biological opinion. Thus, mourning size (Sauer et al. 1994). The CCS proximate issues dealing with CCS dove hunting season frameworks protocol is designed specifically and BBS issues, and instead focus have remained relatively stable for doves, but the number of routes upon ultimate issues of building (Table 1) and administrators and is generally much smaller than for reliable knowledge about relation- biologists have not changed those the BBS, which leads to concerns ships between changes in mourn- frameworks on an annual or regular about the ability of the CCS to ing dove harvest and population basis. detect trends. A reliable calibration demographics. Recent professional algorithm does not exist for con- debate has focused attention on the Population Status and Harvest verting either CCS or BBS indices inability of surveys like the CCS or Surveys to estimates of mourning dove BBS to actually have any meaning- Despite the fact that mourning abundance or density. Furthermore, ful value in making management doves are among the 10 most ubiq- CCS indices may not be correlated decisions (Anderson 2001, Ander- uitous and numerous bird species
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mourning Dove (Zenaida Macroura)
    Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura) February 2006 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Management Leaflet Number 31 General information The mourning dove (Zenaida macroura) is one of the most widely distributed and abundant birds in North America. Fall populations of this game bird in the United States are estimated to be slightly more than 400 million birds. In recent years, the annual harvest by hunting in the United States has been estimated at 18 to 25 million birds, similar to the harvest of all oth- er migratory game birds combined. Mourning doves are highly adaptable, occurring in most ecological types except marshes and heavily forested areas. The mourning dove is a medium-sized member of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Columbidae family. While this family consists of ap- Mourning dove (Zenaida macroura) proximately 300 species of doves and pigeons, only 8 species, including the mourning dove, are native tends his wings and begins a long spiraling glide back to the United States. The mourning dove is approxi- down. The perch coo is one of the few vocalizations mately 11 to 13 inches in length, with a 17– to 19–inch that mourning doves make. It consists of one note fol- wingspan, weighing on average 4.4 ounces. Mourning lowed by a higher one, then three to five notes held at doves have delicate bills and long, pointed tails. They great length, and it is used by males to court females. are grayish-brown and buff in color, with black spots A female will respond to the perch coo in one of three on wing coverts and near ears.
    [Show full text]
  • Mourning Dove Population Status, 2014 Mourning Dove Population Status, 2014
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Mourning Dove Population Status, 2014 Mourning Dove Population Status, 2014 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Migratory Bird Management Population and Habitat Assessment Branch 11510 American Holly Drive Laurel, MD 20708-4002 July 2014 Cover photograph: Mourning Dove by Bob Gress © Suggested citation: Seamans, M. E., and T. A. Sanders. 2014. Mourning dove population status, 2014. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, Washington, D.C. All Division of Migratory Bird Management reports are available on our web site at: http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/newspublicationsreports.html MOURNING DOVE POPULATION STATUS, 2014 MARK E. SEAMANS, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, 755 Parfet Street Suite 235, Lakewood, CO 80215 TODD A. SANDERS, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, 1211 SE Cardinal Court Suite 100, Vancouver, WA 98683 Abstract: This report summarizes information collected annually in the United States on survival, recruitment, abundance and harvest of mourning doves. We report on trends in the number of doves heard and seen per route from the all-bird Breeding Bird Survey (BBS), and provide absolute abundance estimates based on band recovery and harvest data. Harvest and hunter participation are estimated from the Migratory Bird Harvest Information Program (HIP). BBS data suggested that the abundance of mourning doves over the last 48 years increased in the Eastern Management Unit (EMU) and decreased in the Central (CMU) and Western (WMU) Management Units. Estimates of absolute abundance are available only since 2003 and indicate that there are about 275 million doves in the United States; annual abundance during the recent 5 years appears stationary in the EMU and WMU, but may be declining in the CMU.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Has Sprung! in What Should Be One of the Coldest Months of the Year, We Are Having Near Record Highs and Buds Are Starting to Break
    Spring has sprung! In what should be one of the coldest months of the year, we are having near record highs and buds are starting to break. Luckily we have been receiving plenty of moisture in the Pineywoods and from what I can tell from recent browse surveys, we are going into Spring in pretty good shape. In this edition of the Pineywoods Post we will take a look at some of the Pineywoods latest inhabitants, the white winged dove, one of our prettiest plants. a native hibiscus, and get a Eastern Turkey research update from District Leader Gary Calkins. Inside This Edition Page 2 Critter Corner Page 3 Biologist Bio Page 4 Plant Profile Page 6 Outdoor Snapshots Page 7 Research Update If you would like to unsubscribe to this newsletter or if you received this e-mail from someone other than TPWD and would like to subscribe, please send an e-mail indicating such to [email protected] 2 Pineywoods Post Critter Corner Recent Arrivals to the Pineywoods July and August, and biologists are asked to band a certain quota Sean Willis TPWD Wildlife Biologist (Lufkin) for their area. In the past 4 years, District 6 has banded approxi- Doves are one of the most common species of birds found in mately one thousand mourning doves. Bands returned by hunters Texas, and are sought after by more Texas hunters (400,000) than allow us to gain valuable information on migration habits, harvest any other species except deer (600,000). Doves are also one of rates and longevity of the birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Dove and Pigeon Species in the United States
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service COMMON DOVE AND PIGEON SPECIES IN THE UNITED STATES CommonMourningC OMMONDoveC DoveOMMON DOVE and DOVE AND ANDPigeon PIGEON PIGEON SPECIES SPECIESSpecies IN THE IN UNITED THE in UNITED STATEStheRange: STATES United States COMMON DOVE AND- Slightly PIGEON smaller SPECIES than white -wingedIN THE dove UNITED STATES MourningMourning Dove Dove Slightly smaller than white-winged dove Range: Range: Mourning Dove - Dark wing spots (A) Range in the Lower 48 States of the U.S. Mourning Dove - Slightly- Slightly smaller smaller than w thanhite -winged white -winged dove dove Range: - Dark-- SlightlyDarkLong, wing wingtapered smaller spots spots (A)tail than (A) that white ends-winged in a point dove (B) - Dark wing spots (A) -- DarkAfter wing breeding spots season (A) can be found in flocks, - Long, tapered tail that ends in a point (B) occasionally Long,- Long, tapered tapered with tail white tail that that-winged ends ends in doves ina pointa point and (B) Eurasian (B) - After- Long, breeding tapered season tail that can ends be found in a point in flocks (B) , collared doves, especially in areas with abundant occasionally- After breeding with white season-winged can doves be foundand Eurasian in flocks , -food After such breeding breeding as agricultural season season can canand be befoundopen found fields. in flocksin flocks, , collaredoccasionallyoccasionally doves, with especially with white-winged white in areas-winged with doves dovesabundant and and Eurasian occasionallycollared doves, with white especially-winged in doves areas and with Eurasian abundant foodEurasiancollared- Juvenile such asdoves, collared-doves, agriculturalmourning especially doves and inespecially open areascan havefields.
    [Show full text]
  • Ame Springa 2004 10/11/07 2:14 PM Page 1
    GameFall07:Game SpringA 2004 10/11/07 2:14 PM Page 1 A Free Publication of the Wyoming Game & Fish Department Autumn 200 7 HABITAT CONNECTION : HOME TO WILDLIFE Pronghorn antelope live on the prairie. Habitat is like home to wildlife. Just like people, wildlife needs a home. That home must have food, water, e k shelter and space. Do c o G you think fish and a k r a pronghorn antelope M Fish live in aquatic, or water habitats. live in the same habitat? If you said no, then are you correct. A fish, like a trout, lives in a habitat with cool, clean water where lots of bugs live for them to eat. They also need shelter like the banks of a river to provide e k a place to hide. A pronghorn antelope’s habitat is the prairie. c o Pronghorns are herbivores. Herbivores are animals that G k r eat only plants like grass, flowers and bushes. Grass and a M sagebrush provide pronghorn antelope with food on the prairie. They can find water There are only a certain number of animals that a habitat at watering can support. That is because a habitat only has a limited holes and amount of food, water, shelter and space. For example, prairie streams. different amounts of grass will grow depending on how much snow and rain we get in a year. If we have good rain and snow, then more grass will grow for the herbivores to eat. If we don’t get a lot of precipitation, which is rain and e k c o snow, then we might be in a drought, like Wyoming is now.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Order 19: Dove
    Commission Order 19: Dove General Dove Open Areas do not include areas within municipal parks, municipal preserves, county parks, county preserves, airports, golf courses, or posted water treatment facilities (except as specifically opened in this Commission Order) or areas closed to hunting under A.R.S. Sections 17-303 and 17-304 or Commission Rules R12-4-321, R12-4-801, R12-4-802 and R12-4-803. Season Dates Notes Open Areas Legal Wildlife Sep 1 - Sep 15, 2020 (1,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, Open Areas Statewide (refer to the notes for some Any Mourning or White-winged dove 12,13,14,15,16,17) restrictions) Nov 20, 2020 - Jan 3, 2021 (2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, Open Areas Statewide (refer to the notes for some Mourning dove 12,13,14,15,16,17) restrictions) Sep 1, 2020 - Aug 31, 2021 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, Open Areas Statewide (refer to the notes for some Any Eurasian collared dove 12,13,14,15,16,17) restrictions) SHOOTING HOURS: One-half hour before sunrise until sunset. Youth-Only Dove Open Areas do not include areas within municipal parks, municipal preserves, county parks, county preserves, airports, golf courses, or posted water treatment facilities (except as specifically opened in this Commission Order) or areas closed to hunting under A.R.S. Sections 17-303 and 17-304 or Commission Rules R12-4-321, R12-4-801, R12-4-802 and R12-4-803. Season Dates Notes Open Areas Legal Wildlife Sep 5 - Sep 6, 2020 (1,3,5) Robbins Butte Wildlife Area Mourning dove, White-winged dove, and Eurasian collared dove SHOOTING HOURS: One-half hour before sunrise until sunset.
    [Show full text]
  • Mourning Dove and Mixed Blood: Cultural and Historical Pressures on Aesthetic Choice and Authorial Identity Author(S): Margaret A
    Mourning Dove and Mixed Blood: Cultural and Historical Pressures on Aesthetic Choice and Authorial Identity Author(s): Margaret A. Lukens Source: American Indian Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Summer, 1997), pp. 409-422 Published by: University of Nebraska Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1185515 Accessed: 13-01-2016 22:45 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of Nebraska Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Indian Quarterly. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 76.77.170.59 on Wed, 13 Jan 2016 22:45:39 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions MourningDove and Mixed Blood: Culturaland Historical Pressureson AestheticChoice and AuthorialIdentity MargaretA. Lukens Mourning Dove is the pen name of ChristineQuintasket, one of the foremothers of contemporaryNative American women novelists. Her only novel to reach publicationwas a western romanceentitled Cogewea,the Half-Blood:A Depiction of the GreatMontana Cattle Range, published in 1927, fifteen years after she began writing it. In Cogewea,Mourning Dove createdsome of the earliestheroic "half-blood"characters of Native Americanliterature, anticipating by fifty years the recuperativetheme of LeslieSilko's Ceremony(1977) and PaulaGunn Allen's Woman Who Owned the Shadows(1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Lhe MOURNING DOVE in IOWA: a WASTED RESOURCE
    Volume 17 January, 1958 Number 1 lHE MOURNING DOVE IN IOWA: A WASTED RESOURCE • * * * * * * * * -· ( B y Ra y Beckman NEGLIGENCE TOPS ( ' h lct, Dhi&ion of li'l,h a n d Gam e BOATING FATALITIES Mourning Doves have been re­ garded as game birds from the Operator negligence is appar­ f earliest history of th1s nation. ~ntly the primary contribution to Early settlers recognized them as fatal boating accidents, according being close relatives of Old World to a recent study of 452 mishaps I pigeons. The writers of those f involving small pleasure boats by A times speak of the bird familiarly, the Outboard Boating Club of \ especially as a game b1rd that re­ America. lieved the hardships of pioneer The study, representing the .first life Iowa law recognized the published data on fatal accidents Mourning Dove as a game bird. involving small pleasure boats, Section 109.41 lists: "The Colum­ was made on the basis of news­ bidae: Mourning Doves and wild paper accounts between the penod rock doves only" as game birds. May 1, 1956, and December 31, The present legal status of the 1956. Additional information was Mournmg Dove identifies it as a gleaned from various state records migratory bird protected by both for the same period and from Jan­ state and federal law. An open uary 1, 1956, through April 30, season is provided for by federal 1956. During the period of the law. report, 614 boaters lost their Hves A Game p<'cies as a result of the 452 mishaps. In Iowa Code the dove is not Under the headmg of "Causes" carried on the list of birds for the report states in part: which a season is provided, al­ "I t is apparent that a majority though the bird is carried on the J lnt :;h~rman Photo of the fatalities occurrmg each The Mourning Dove is the nation's most important migratory game bird, sar U.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download Decorative Canvasback Pair Pdf Free Download
    DECORATIVE CANVASBACK PAIR PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Jamie Welsh | 48 pages | 10 Jan 2007 | Stackpole Magazines | 9781881982425 | English | United States Decorative Canvasback Pair PDF Book Weiler Framed and Print "John Dilley. The buyer may request shipment at the buyer's expense to an FFL dealer to resell a gun on the buyer's behalf. Zachmann Mallard Drake Duck Decoy,. Message: characters remaining. It has tacks eyes the carver is unknown circa Shourds Bluebill Drake Duck Decoy,. Virginia buyers are subject to Virginia sales tax at the rate 5. Clair Bluebill Duck Decoys. Very unique. Black duck by an unknown Delaware River maker, ca. Unknown Maker Teal Hen. Sign In with one of your Social Accounts. January 23rd, Colorado Springs, CO. I discussed custom carving knives and some basic cuts in the Winter and Spring issues of Wildfowl Carving Magazine. We are adding your Comments. E5 Pennsylvania Susquehanna Rive Mallard Hen in original paint, very unusually form the body is laminated in tree layers of wood , good condition all original A Easter Shore Maryland full size white Swan by A. Merganser Pair. Sean Sutton Mourning Dove. Report Inappropriate Comment Are you sure you would like to report this comment? Small tight check in the neck and a small check in her bottom side. Pocket bluebill pair by Warren Meiler Hamilton, Ontario. Branded WRG on the bottom, turned head, excellent original paint. Shourds Miniature Decorative Mergansers,. Paint is a second coat of working paint, also done by McGaw. Lot : Paul Foytack Jr. Art is the great grandson of the well know early decoy maker, Capt.
    [Show full text]
  • Mourning Dove Population Status, 2016 Mourning Dove Population Status, 2016
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Mourning Dove Population Status, 2016 Mourning Dove Population Status, 2016 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Migratory Bird Management Population and Habitat Assessment Branch 11510 American Holly Drive Laurel, MD 20708-4002 August 2016 Cover photograph: Mourning Doves by Theresa Twilley Wiltrout © Suggested citation: Seamans, M. E. 2016. Mourning dove population status, 2016. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, Washington, D.C. All Division of Migratory Bird Management reports are available on our web site at: https://www.fws.gov/birds/surveys-and-data/reports-and-publications.php MOURNING DOVE POPULATION STATUS, 2016 MARK E. SEAMANS, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, 755 Parfet Street Suite 235, Lakewood, CO 80215 Abstract: This report summarizes information collected annually in the U.S. on survival, recruitment, abundance and harvest of mourning doves. We report on trends in the number of doves heard and seen per route from the all- bird Breeding Bird Survey (BBS), and provide absolute abundance estimates based on band recovery and harvest data. Harvest and hunter participation are estimated from the Migratory Bird Harvest Information Program (HIP). BBS data suggested that the abundance of mourning doves over the last 50 years increased in the Eastern Management Unit (EMU) and decreased in the Central (CMU) and Western (WMU) Management Units. Estimates of absolute abundance are available only since 2003 and indicate that there were about 266 million doves in the U.S. as of 1 September 2015. Abundance varied among management units in 2015: EMU 63,286,288 (SE=3,290,229); CMU 165,991,834 (SE=9,523,964); and WMU 37,043,828 (SE=2,510,384).
    [Show full text]
  • Mourning Doves in Florida1 William M
    WEC 226 Mourning Doves in Florida1 William M. Giuliano, James F. Selph, Kurt Hodges, and Nick Wiley2 While many species of dove live in Florida, the mourning include the diamond dove (Geopelia cuneate), ringed turtle dove (Zenaida macroura) is the only dove species native to dove (Streptopelia risoria), rock dove or common pigeon the state (Figure 1). (Columba livia), and Eurasian collared or ring-necked dove (Streptopelia decaocto). Being the most widely distributed and only native species of dove in Florida, mourning doves will be the focus of this report. Distribution and Status Mourning doves can be found throughout southern Canada, all of the U.S. and Central America, and most of the Caribbean Islands. Found throughout Florida, the greatest numbers of mourning doves appear to be in the central portion of the state. Florida populations increase during the winter months, when the resident population is supplemented by birds migrating in from the north. During the past 40 years, dove populations have remained relatively Figure 1. Mourning doves are the most widely distributed and only stable in the eastern U.S., with a 1% increase during the native species of dove in Florida. last 10 years. In Florida, dove populations increased by 2% Credits: J. C. Leupold, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service during the past 40 years, but decreased slightly (2%) during Many dove species that reside in Florida, while not native, the last 10 years. Throughout the U.S., the number of dove are state and federally protected, including the common hunters and birds harvested annually has been declining.
    [Show full text]