Rubik's Brand V. Flambeau, Inc
Neutral As of: May 8, 2021 7:03 PM Z Rubik's Brand v. Flambeau, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York January 31, 2021, Decided; January 31, 2021, Filed 17-CV-6559 (PGG) (KHP) Reporter 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20031 *; 2021 WL 363704 appearance of the Rubik's Cube in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq., as well as New York state law RUBIK'S BRAND LIMITED, Plaintiff, - against - and common law. Discovery now having been completed, FLAMBEAU, INC., et al., Defendants. Flambeau has moved for summary judgment. (ECF No. 156.) RBL opposes the motion and asks the Court to, instead, grant it summary judgment on all of its claims.1 For the reasons set forth below, I respectfully recommend that Flambeau's Counsel: [*1] For Rubik's Brand Limited, Plaintiff, Counter motion be GRANTED in part and DENIED in [*2] part and Defendant: Cassandra M Tam, PRO HAC VICE, Shaub & that RBL's request be GRANTED in part and DENIED in Williams LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Darren Wayne Saunders, part. Mark I. Peroff, Peroff Saunders P.C, New York, NY. BACKGROUND Judges: KATHARINE H. PARKER, United States Magistrate Judge. HON. PAUL G. GARDEPHE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. The Parties Plaintiff RBL is a United Kingdom LLC that operates out of London, England. (ECF Nos. 176-77 ("Counter 56.1") ¶ 1.) Opinion by: KATHARINE H. PARKER RBL's business model is based, at least in part, on its licensing of intellectual property rights to prominent toy manufacturers.
[Show full text]