DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Documennt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Documennt PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Ruislip Village Ruislip Village Conservation Area Appraisal July 2010 London Borough of Hillingdon Ruislip Village Conservation Area Appraisal PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Ruislip Village ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS With thanks to Mrs EM Bowlt for her invaluable help with regards to the history of Ruislip and also for her assistance in the editing of this document. London Borough of Hillingdon Ruislip Village Conservation Area Appraisal PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Ruislip Village CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Introduction Planning Policy Context and to consult with the wider community as part of this process. 1.1 The Ruislip Village Conservation 1.3 This appraisal has been developed Area was designated in 1969. It was within the context of the 1.6 As of 1st April 2006 the Government one of the first such areas to be conservation policies contained set a Best Value Performance agreed within the London Borough within London Borough of Hillingdon Indicator (BVPI 219b) requiring local of Hillingdon. It contained Manor Unitary Development Plan Saved planning authorities to complete Farm, the administrative centre of Policies document, the emerging conservation area appraisals and the Manor of Ruislip, St Martin’s Local Development Framework, The reviews. Church, the ecclesiastical centre of London Plan, the guidance the Parish of Ruislip and the ancient contained within Planning Policy 1.7 Planning Policy Statement 5 advises buildings at the northern end of Statement 5 (PPS 5) and the that conservation areas are historic Ruislip High Street and the southern relevant Planning Acts. assets and that they have meaning end of Bury Street. for society over and above 1.4 Section 69 of the Planning (Listed functional quality. Heritage 1.2 On 14th January 2009, the Buildings and Conservation Areas) significance is considered to justify conservation area, which originally Act 1990 requires local authorities to the protection of assets within the included only the medieval village designate conservation areas. planning process. In the case of centre, was extended to include all These are defined as “areas of conservation areas, PPS5 advises of the High Street and the later special architectural or historic this can be achieved by supporting residential suburbs to the west. interest the character or appearance their management and controlling These had been built on the Park of which it is desirable to preserve or change in ways that sustain and House Estate, Withy Crofts and the enhance”. Local authorities are also where appropriate enhances, their meadowland belonging to the King’s required to keep this process under heritage significance. PPS5 also College Estate. The conservation review. advises that better decisions will be area also includes the old hamlets of made if applicants and local Great King’s End and Little King’s 1.5 Section 71 of the Act requires local authorities understand the End to the west of the original authorities to formulate and publish significance of an area. A village centre. proposals for conservation areas conservation area appraisal is an 3 London Borough of Hillingdon Ruislip Village Conservation Area Appraisal PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Ruislip Village assessment of the character of a 1.10 The aim of a conservation area It will support the effective conservation area and is also appraisal is to assess these determination of planning and other considered as an assessment of its elements, to define the special applications, and form robust significance. architectural and/or historic supporting evidence at planning character of the area and to appeals. It will also provide local 1.8 English Heritage has provided highlight areas requiring owners and residents with clear guidance on the appraisal and enhancement. advice on those forms of management of conservation areas. development considered appropriate These documents have informed the 1.11 Conservation area character and so likely to be supported by the drafting of this appraisal. appraisals are important planning Council. The appraisal will be a policy tools. They inform the material consideration in Conservation Area Designation and development control decision determining planning applications the need for an Appraisal making process and provide a within the conservation area. framework for enhancement 1.9 Conservation area designation proposals. All of these contribute focuses on the overall quality and towards the successful management interest of an area and depends on of conservation areas and work best much more than the quality of when there is a clear understanding individual buildings. Features such of the area’s “significance”. as building layout, open spaces, boundaries, thoroughfares, the mix 1.12 The purpose of the Ruislip Village of uses, the use of materials and Conservation Area Appraisal is, street furniture, all contribute to the therefore, to improve our character of the area. It is also understanding of the built heritage of common for a conservation area to the area. The document will enable include a number of designated the Council to develop its historic buildings. conservation policies and maximise opportunities for improving the environment within the area. 4 London Borough of Hillingdon Ruislip Village Conservation Area Appraisal PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Ruislip Village CHAPTER 2: SUMMARY OF SPECIAL INTEREST Location and Setting General Character 1920s and 30s and have a spacious and leafy character. They include 2.1 The Ruislip Village Conservation 2.3 The medieval village forms the core good quality houses of varied size Area has a green and open setting. of the conservation area. This and design, many set on tree lined To the north lies Park Wood, which includes (Ruislip) Manor Farm, St. roads. is part of the Ruislip Woods National Martin’s Church and the buildings Nature Reserve and Ruislip Lido, immediately surrounding them. This History created as a reservoir in 1811 and area contains a number of early now a recreational area. The River timber framed listed buildings and 2.6 The original village and surrounding Pinn and its water meadows fall Locally Listed buildings. Many un- hamlets remained largely unaltered within the northernmost part of the listed buildings within the area also until the arrival of the railway in the conservation area, and provide an make a positive contribution to its early 20th century. The areas to the attractive green corridor along this appearance. west and south west of the village boundary. The area is surrounded centre then grew and were by Green Belt to the north, east and 2.4 The High Street lies to the developed very much in the “Garden west. immediate west and southwest of Suburb” tradition. These are high the Church and forms the quality residential areas, which 2.2 To the south-west, south and east, commercial centre of the area. In include a number of large detached the conservation area is surrounded appearance it is very much a busy dwellings set in mature gardens. by residential development, mainly and traditional high street. It mainly ranging in date from the1930’s to comprises parades of early 20th 2.7 Today, Ruislip has a distinct identity, the 1970’s. These areas comprise century shops of a variety of styles which reflects its historical mostly detached and semi-detached characteristic of the period, with development, but which also retains houses and more recent small interesting architectural detailing a strong village character. blocks of flats. and decoration. Recent Changes 2.5 Beyond the High Street and the early village core, are residential 2.8 Some of the residential streets areas. These mainly date from the within the conservation area have 5 London Borough of Hillingdon Ruislip Village Conservation Area Appraisal PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Ruislip Village recently been the subject of housing estate to the south of Wood Other Designations within the development proposals for blocks of Lane. This is mid 1960s in date and Conservation Area flats. Such developments have is of a different character to the been focussed for the most part on Edwardian, and interwar housing 2.13 The area is rich in historic buildings Kingsend and Wood Lane. Where areas, which have been included and features. Within the built, these have significantly altered within the conservation area. conservation area there are 23 the character and appearance of statutorily Listed Buildings, 26 these areas, with the loss of 2.11 From Wood Lane, the western Locally Listed buildings and 1 established development patterns boundary continues along historic Scheduled Ancient Monument. Their and a general erosion of the quality Sharps Lane, and includes all the locations are illustrated on the of the streetscape. properties to the east and those of a following map and Appendix 1 similar date and quality on the contains further details of these Boundary western side of the road. features. 2.9 The conservation area is bounded 2.12 Continuing north, the boundary runs by Pinn Way to the north. It includes along the public footpath opposite the Manor Farm site, and the the junction of Sharps Lane, Hill residential properties on the western Lane and Manor Road. It then side of St. Martin’s Approach. To the follows the boundary of Barringers east, the boundary continues around Court and the Youth Centre playing St. Martin’s Church and Church field, continues to the north to Field Gardens, and then
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Buses from Yiewsley
    Buses from Yiewsley U1 Swakeleys Road Ickenham West Ruislip Ruislip Ruislip Swakeleys Roundabout High Road High Street 222 U3 U5 Uxbridge Uxbridge RUISLIP UXBRIDGE Civic Centre Cowley Road Hillingdon Road Whitehall Schools Manor Waye Hillingdon Road The Greenway The Greenway Cowley Road Uxbridge High School Cowley Mill Road Brunel University Kingston Lane Cleveland Road Villier Street Cowley Road Ferndale Crescent Kingston Lane Pentecostal Church Brunel University COWLEY Cleveland Road The yellow tinted area includes every Cowley High Street Route fi nder Station Road Station Road Church Road Hillingdon bus stop up to about one-and-a-half Cleveland Road St. Laurence Church Hospital miles from Yiewsley. Main stops are shown in the white area outside. Day buses Church Road Pield Heath Road Huxley Close Peel Way High Road Bus route Towards Bus stops Benbow Waye Colham Green Hounslow 222 Cowley S EFTO Peachey Uxbridge LANE HILLINGDON EACHY D ICE P A COPP E N HIGH NEWR Y O H Ruislip A R T HEATH W U1 HEATH ER LANE E N E O NT West Drayton A R LA E D E ME ALK Colham Green Road ORS E TH Violet Avenue EW W L HORNB H A G Violet Avenue SE Heathrow Terminals 1, 2, 3 T Pinn River C O T BOAT LAN HE U3 . A E Tomo C L T RYELAND LOSE ORFIELD M C S PACK Industrial CLOSE O CLO ST. SE Apple Tree Uxbridge Grand UnionEstate Canal IL Colham Green Road M Playing OF L CR NEWCOMBE Avenue Beechwood Avenue Field LEA T RISE Zodiac Hayes & Harlington Rabbsfarm C U5 Business L O L Primary Chantry Park View Road Park C S Hail & Ride section Uxbridge
    [Show full text]
  • Putting Our Residents First In
    Putting our residents first in Heathrow Villages Improving your local area Village improvements • 54 new trees have been planted in • New flowers were planted on the green Heathrow Villages, including one at in Harmondsworth Village and roadside Harmondsworth Recreation Ground to mark the 550th birth anniversary of Guru verges. The village received new bike Nanak. We also gave away 5,000 free tree racks, bins and fencing, and the Barnes saplings to residents, schools, community Wallis memorial was enhanced. groups and businesses in 2019. • A small orchard was also planted in • In autumn 2018 a water fountain was Moor Lane Allotments. installed at Sipson Recreation Ground. • In Harlington, new hanging baskets • The council continues to tackle were installed, trees and daffodils environmental crime and has issued 2,979 were planted, and existing shrubs were fines for littering in Heathrow Villages. 12 pruned. The pond plaque was replaced, new litter bins have also been installed. new fencing erected and bins and • CHRYSALIS benches replaced. The village received 1,536 Heathrow Villages residents have Outdoor gyms were opened at Harmondsworth Recreation a new community noticeboard and the used the council’s free bulky waste Ground (pictured) and Sipson Recreation Ground ‘Harlington’ sign was refurbished. collection service. To find out more visit www.hillingdon.gov.uk/bulkywaste. Conservation • The council is installing ‘No Idling’ Supporting the local community • The council has been preparing a bid signage outside all schools and hotspots • The council’s mobile library van makes High Street, Harmondsworth High for National Lottery funding to support across the borough to help improve weekly visits to Heathrow Villages to Street and Coleridge Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruislip, Northwood & Eastcote Local History Society Everyday Life
    Ruislip, Northwood & Eastcote Local History Society Everyday Life on the Manor of Ruislip c. 1200-1500: Workshop on Manorial Records Led by Dr Virginia Bainbridge: Friday 11 May: 2.30-4.30 pm: The Stables, Eastcote House Gardens 2.30-3.00 – Life on Ruislip Manor for the medieval tenants of the Abbey of Bec: Powerpoint introduction to the manorial system and using its records as sources for local history 1. Origins of the Manorial System The origin of the manorial system stretches back into the era long before written records. The earliest documents recording land ownership are records of royal administration: Anglo-Saxon charters recording grants of land, Domesday Book written in 1086 recording changes in ownership and property values after the Norman Conquest, and the Pipe Rolls written by the scribes of the Exchequer from 1130 recording taxation collected by the sheriff (shire-reeve) of each county. 2. What is a Manor – Lords and Peasants – The ‘Feudal Pyramid’ From the time of the Norman Conquest, the legal fiction that the king owned all the land and granted it to his vassals governed the pattern of landholding. The great lords, the barons, abbots and bishops, held great estates from the king composed of many manors. Lesser lords, knights and gentry, held one or more manors, either directly from the king or from his barons and churchmen. By the late 12th century a market in parcels of freehold land and even whole estates had developed. Knightly families paid scribes to write deeds recording their exchange of property rights, both leases and sales.
    [Show full text]
  • Buses from West Drayton
    Buses from West Drayton U1 AD Ruislip HIG FIELD RO FAIR COLHAM AVENUE H Grand Union Canal S A T L RE ST BE . School West Ruislip S E T RT EPHEN'S T R OA BENTINCK ROAD RO D U5 350 A Ickenham Uxbridge Station Road D High Road for intu Uxbridge Fairey Corner HORTON ROAD L R C O B S Swakeleys Road Cowley Road Hayes & Harlington E E L R KNOW T T S A V S West IS TATION CLOSE TO APPROA Drayton CK ROAD CH U3 Uxbridge Cowley Station Road for intu Uxbridge High Street Clayton Road for Hayes Town Medical Centre RD RD WICK ILL WAR M M HA Uxbridge Station Road Hayes OL Civic Centre Botwell Green Sports C D & Leisure Centre R S T A CHE LE T R L R I IO ORCH Y E N AR U D DV N R Hillingdon Road Brunel University Church Road Botwell Lane E O N The Greenway Cleveland Road for Lake Farm Country Park V A A D RA RS B E Buses from West Drayton R D R A Playing E O U1 222 F R Ruislip N Field Uxbridge Brunel University Church Road Hillingdon Hospital Botwell Common Road A for intu Uxbridge Kingston Lane W Primary S School West Ruislip Cowley Road Hillingdon Hospital Colham Green Road Furzeground Way Destination finder U5 350 Ickenham Uxbridge Station Road Destination Bus routes Bus stops Destination Bus routes Bus stops High Road for intu Uxbridge Fairey Corner B Hounslow Bus Station 222 ,b ,f ,h ,j Botwell Common Road 350 ,c ,e ,g ,k Hounslow Treaty Shopping Centre 222 ,b ,f ,h ,j Botwell Lane 350 ,c ,e ,g ,k Hounslow West 222 ,b ,f ,h ,j for Lake Farm Country Park SwakeleysCowley Road Cowley Road Hayes &Violet Harlington Avenue Park View Road Stockley
    [Show full text]
  • Ickenham HCA FINAL 2018
    Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment November 2018 Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Sam Griffiths Richard Hammond Mary Kucharska Landscape Architect, AECOM Associate Landscape Architect, Senior Consultant, AECOM AECOM Joe Critchley Built Heritage Consultant, AECOM Revision History Revision Revision date Details Name Position A 03/10/18 Incorporation of Sam Griffiths Landscape Architect Ickenham Neighbourhood Group Comments B 15/11/18 Incorporation of Sam Griffiths Landscape Architect Locality’s comments Prepared for: Locality AECOM 2 Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment Prepared for: Ickenham Neighbourhood Forum Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited 36 Storey's Way Cambridgeshire Cambridge CB3 0DT UK T: +44 1223 488 000 aecom.com © 2018 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract with Locality (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document Prepared for: Locality AECOM 3 Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 No 1 March.Pdf
    WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY Executive Committee Chairman Mrs Yvonne Masson [email protected] Vice Chairman Jim Devine Secretary Tony Simpson 32 The Avenue, Bedford Park, Chiswick W4 1HT [email protected] Treasurer Paul Kershaw 241 Waldegrave Road, Twickenham TW1 4SY [email protected] Membership Secretary Mrs June Watkins 22 Chalmers Road, Ashford, Middlesex TW15 1DT [email protected] Editor Mrs Pam Smith 23 Worple Road, Ashford, Middlesex TW15 1DT [email protected] Committee Members Mavis Burton Kay Dudman Richard Chapman Patrick Harnden Mike Cordery Maggie Mold Programme Secretary Mrs. Maggie Mold 48 Darby Crescent, Sunbury-on-Thames Middlesex TW16 5LA Society Web site http://www.west-middlesex-fhs.org.uk/ Subscriptions All Categories: £10.00 per annum Subscription year l January to 31 December Examiners Chris Hern and Muriel Sprott In all correspondence please mark your envelope WMFHS in the upper left-hand corner; if a reply is needed, a SAE/IRCs must be enclosed. Members are asked to note that receipts are only sent by request, if return postage is included. Published by West Middlesex Family History Society Registered Charity No. 291906 WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY JOURNAL Volume 24 Number 1 March 2006 Contents Future meetings …………………………………………….. 2 News Roundup ……………………………………………... 3 The Story of Greenwich ……………………………………. 6 Surnames on the Internet …………………………………… 7 Christmas Past and Present ………………………………… 8 The Rural Past ……………………………………………… 10 Tales from the Harlington Parish Registers ………………... 11 Certificate Courier Service …………………………………. 13 A Very Unconventional Great Aunt ……………………….. 14 Hayes Middlesex …………………………………………… 19 Enclosure in the 19th Century (Part 2) ……………………..
    [Show full text]
  • HARMONDSWORTH and SIPSON RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION Comments
    HARMONDSWORTH AND SIPSON RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION comments Page: Draft New London Plan Section: N/A The percentage of affordable housing should be greater with the provision of a reliable and fail-safe system in place to prevent unscrupulous landlords from purchasing low cost housing with a view to rent out at the high rents all areas within Greater London. Page: Policy H2 Small sites Section: N/A As with the large sites the targets are totally unrealistic in terms of numbers planned and in the period they should be built in. Page: Policy H7 Affordable housing tenure Section: 4.7.4 It would seem that boroughs will make their own decsions on the criteria used as to how affordable properties will be allocated to applicants, and will this mean you already need to reside in the borough to qualify for a property there or can you apply to any borough for a suitable housing Page: Policy H12 Housing size mix Section: N/A The idea of a good housing mix to meet the needs of the local population sounds excellent but I cannot see how this will be implemented as developers will build what they think they can sell quickly they do don't usually consider what people actually want. How will coucil ensure they achieve the right housing mix? Page: Policy S1 Developing London's social infrastructure Section: N/A Some good ideas but in reality will be difficult to implement, Our community is lacking many facilities. Empty buildings remain empty because they command high rents which cannot be afforded by community groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Heathrow Community Forums Review
    Classification: Public Becky Coffin Heathrow Community Forums Review 14/01/2021 Classification: Public Strategic Current external community forums Other Forum Advisory Group: run by the Elected Communities Members Team Members: Council leaders & council Heathrow cabinet members HCEB Independent Community Noise Local Focus Forum Local Liaison Groups Poyle Business Forum Forum (HCNF) and Community Strategic Advisory Group: HCNF working Chair: Director Of Forum Chair: HCEB Chair Communities & group Communities Iver & Riching Park Longford Stakeholders Topics covered: Economic Development Members: Broad Chair: Director of • Sustainability group of reps who Heston, Cranford & Forum Carbon Strategy • Surface access/public Stanwell are affected by the transport Cranford Cross airport's day to day • operations / Runway ops/night Transport, expansion Topics covered: flights environment & Harmondsworth, Sipson Passenger Service • Airspace • Community Stanwell Moor noise advisor group & Harlington Group (PSG) • Noise engagement & (TENAG) • Runway investment operations • Heathrow expansion Hatton, Bedfont & Brands Hill, Colnbrook Topics covered: Topics covered: • All current North Feltham & Poyle • Surface access • Passenger and future • experience / Members: Air quality • facilities Resident association Public Transport Overview: reps & Ward/parish • Noise Created by Heathrow for local councillors from • Environment Members: communities to run and manage villages close to • LA appointed themselves. Members: Airport Heathrow within reps Members:
    [Show full text]
  • Updating and Screening Assessment Report 2012
    2012 Air Quality Updating and Screening Assessment for The London Borough of Hillingdon In fulfillment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management June 2012 London Borough of Hillingdon Local Authority Officer Val Beale Department Environmental Protection Unit Address 3S02, Civic Centre High Street Uxbridge UB8 1UW Telephone 01895 277454 e-mail [email protected] Report AEAT/ENV/R/3292 Reference number Date 7th June 2012 USA2012 ii London Borough of Hillingdon Customer: Contact: London Borough of Hillingdon Andy Lewin AEA Technology plc Customer reference: Gemini Building, Harwell, Didcot, OX11 0QR AEAT/ENV/R/3292 t: 0870 190 6355 e: [email protected] Confidentiality, copyright & reproduction: AEA is a business name of AEA Technology plc This report is the Copyright of London AEA is certificated to ISO9001 and ISO14001 Borough of Hillingdon and has been prepared by AEA Technology plc under Author: contract to London Borough of Hillingdon dated 01/05/2012. The contents of this report Andrew Lewin may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor passed to any organisation or person Approved By: without the specific prior written permission Dr Scott Hamilton of London Borough of Hillingdon. AEA Technology plc accepts no liability whatsoever to any third party for any loss or Date: damage arising from any interpretation or 07 June 2012 use of the information contained in this report, or reliance on any views expressed Signed: therein. AEA reference: Ref: ED57938001- Issue 2 USA2012 iii London Borough of Hillingdon Executive Summary This report fulfils the requirements of the Local Air Quality Management process as set out in Part IV of the Environment Act (1995), the Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland 2007 and the relevant Policy and Technical Guidance documents.
    [Show full text]
  • London Diocesan Fund
    Diocese of London A report on the proposed expansion of HEATHROW AIRPORT by the Head of ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGE St Peter and St Paul Harlington February 2009 1 Diocese of London A report on the proposed expansion of Heathrow Airport Contents Introduction and Summary 3 Background 4 Map 5 Government decision 6 Current position 7 Issues Aviation; Heathrow Airport 8 Hubbing; Development within existing limits; Terminals and runways 9 Heathrow East; Business and people; Sipson village 10 Harmondsworth Church; Harmondsworth village 11 Longford; Harlington and Cranford; Cranford village and church; The physical environs; Archaeology 12 Burials; Noise; Air pollution 13 Greenhouse gas emissions 14 Advice of Committee on Climate Change 15 Other airports, dioceses and sites; The long term 17 Mitigation 18 Parish and people, worship and mission 20 Alternatives to airport expansion 21 Transitional considerations 23 Legal advice; Communications advice 24 Discussion Heritage; People and places 25 Noise and pollution; Business and the economy; Worship and mission 26 Climate change 27 Conclusions 28 St Mary Harmondsworth 2 Introduction and summary British Airports Authority (BAA) is developing proposals for a new third runway and sixth terminal to Heathrow, to the north of the A4 Bath Road, and south of the M4. By way of background, the history of the development of these proposals, and of responses to previous consultations, is recapitulated. Current policy and action are summarised, leading to the recent government decision to support expansion. Planning permission will however still be needed. The issues having a bearing on whether or not the proposed new runway and terminal should go ahead are then analysed.
    [Show full text]
  • Sipson Village.Pdf
    SIPSON A VILLAGE UNDER THREAT by Philip Sherwood A. Holiday Inn Hotel B. The “Plough”C Former Baptist Church D. The “King William IV” E. Primary School F. Old Farmhouse G. Post Office H. The “Crown” J. Sipson Court K The “Three Magpies” Map of Sipson, 2007 Sipson is a village in the north-east of the parish of Harmondsworth that in the past 60 years has three times been threatened with destruction to allow for the expansion of Heathrow Airport. It is the second largest settlement in the parish and is first recorded as Sibbeston in a manorial document of 1110. The name is of Anglo-Saxon origin and it must have existed long before it appeared in the records. In the Harmondsworth Parish Registers it frequently appears as Shepiston which has led to the erroneous assumption that the name is derived from the town-ship of sheep. In fact it is said to mean “Sibwin’s tun” which reflects the earlier name and has nothing whatever to do with sheep. The latest threat to the village came in the Government White Paper of 2002 which proposed the construction of a “short runway” between the Bath Road (A4) and the M4 motorway. This would have involved the destruction of most of the village but it has since been followed-up by BAA’s Master Plan for Heathrow published in June 2005. This envisages not only a third runway but the construction of a sixth terminal for Heathrow which would lead to the complete obliteration of the village and the forcible eviction of the villagers from their homes.
    [Show full text]
  • Heathrow Immigration Removal Centre Harmondsworth Site
    Report on an unannounced inspection of Heathrow Immigration Removal Centre Harmondsworth site by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons 2–20 October 2017 This inspection was carried out with assistance from colleagues at the General Pharmaceutical Council and in partnership with the following bodies: Crown copyright 2018 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at the address below or: [email protected] This publication is available for download at: http://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons/ Printed and published by: Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons Clive House 5th floor 70 Petty France London SW1H 9EX England 2 Harmondsworth Immigration Removal Centre Contents Contents Introduction 5 Fact page 7 About this inspection and report 9 Summary 13 Section 1. Safety 21 Section 2. Respect 33 Section 3. Activities 45 Section 4. Preparation for removal and release 49 Section 5. Summary of recommendations and good practice 53 Section 6. Appendices 59 Appendix I: Inspection team 59 Appendix II: Progress on recommendations from the last report
    [Show full text]