DOCSLIB.ORG

Siach Hasadeh – Field Talk Collected Essays for Tu B’Shvat 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Siach Hasadeh – Field Talk Collected Essays for Tu B’Shvat 2015 SiaCH haSadeh – Field TalK Collected Essays for Tu B’Shvat 2015 MIDRESHET LINDENBAUM SIACH HASADEh – FIELD TALK שיח השדה Chana and Yaacov Tilles Women’s Campus Besen Family Center for Advanced Women’s Studies 51 Leib Yaffe Street, Jerusalem 9339082 Tel: +972-2-671-0043 | Fax: +972-2-671-0144 [email protected] | www.Midreshet-Lindenbaum.org.il America Latina Programa Midreshet Darkaynu Susi Bradfield Women’s Institute for Halachic Leadership The Maria and Joel Finkle Overseas Program Tochnit Hadas Tochnit Bruriah Tochnit Tushia Design: JK Jen Klor Photos of the Seven Species by Sara Eichler, class of 1989-90, who currently lives in Jerusalem. שיח השדה SIACH HASADEh – FIELD TALK AND THE ALMOND-TREE SHALL BLOssOM HaRav Ohad Teharlev, Director, Israeli Programs Tu b’Shvat, the New Year particularly] almonds? of Trees, is identified That is the fruit that with the blossoming blossoms quicker than of the almond tree in other fruits. Likewise, the winter, around the he who opposes time of Tu b’Shvat. The the kehunah, his familiar words that we punishment comes hear in kindergartens quickly.” and school assemblies, From here we remind us of that: understand that rashi derives that the almond – השקדיה פורחת “The almond tree is tree symbolizes the blossoming … Tu b’Shvat speedy blossoming has arrived, a holiday for before the coming the trees.” of Spring and the blossoming of other Why? What is the meaning fruits. In contrast, the of the early flowering of chizkuni explains that the almond tree? Is there the almond (shaked) a link between this and Tu symbolizes diligence b’Shvat? To answer these (shakdanut): questions, we will try to trace the emergence It gave forth and significance of the blossoms, sprouted almond tree in Biblical buds – a sign that and rabbinic literature. from there came forth Kohanim who are diligent in their work, as We find the almond tree in three different dimensions it is said, ’Kohanim, they are diligent.’ (Bamidbar, – human, place and time. 17,23) The AppearancE of the Almond Tree in the It appears that the chizkuni based his explanation Human Dimension on the pshat – the most simple explanation of G-d’s In Parshat Korach, in Bamidbar, after the earth opened words to Jeremiah (1, 11-12): its mouth and swallowed Korach and his community, Moreover, the word of G-d came to me, saying: Moses asks in the name of G-d that the head of each ’Jeremiah, what do you see?’ And I said: ’I see a tribe bring his staff to the Tent of the Testimony – rod of an almond-tree.’ Then G-d said to me: Ohel haEdut – in order to show the people who has ’You have seen well; for I watch over My word been chosen by G-d. And so it is written in Bamidbar, to perform it.’ 17, 23: The chizkuni explains that the Kohanim have an And on the following day Moses came to the important distinction that is essential to their Tent of Testimony, and behold, Aaron’s staff daily service – it is the quality of diligence – the for the house of Levi had blossomed! It gave Kohanim are diligent and persevere in their work. forth blossoms, sprouted buds, and produced rashi, on the other hand, drew on his concept of the ripe almonds. almond, and wrote similarly in his commentary on rashi points out: “…why [did Aaron’s staff bear Jeremiah: g SIACH HASADEh – FIELD TALK שיח השדה And the Almond-Tree Shall Blossom, continued g You did well to see – this almond The almond is the tailbone, because as one rushes to blossom before all approaches old age, the flesh declines and the the trees, just as I rush to bone becomes prominent and resembles the keep my word. bud of the almond, that very same bone which conceals the promise of resurrection. The AppearancE of the Almond in the Human The AppearancE of the Almond in the Body Dimension of SpacE In the book of Kohelet, there is We do not know of a place called ’Shaked’ but we do an illustration of the end of a man’s know of a place called Luz in Breishit 28, 19: “And he life. Kohelet uses beautiful imagery to named the place Beit El, but Luz was orignally the illustrate how the eyes cease to see, the name of the city.” teeth cease to grind, and the entire body Why was Beit El called ’Luz’? decays and decomposes, and just then, there is one bone that begins to bloom “and rabbenu Bechaye explains: from that city the world the almond tree shall blossom.” (Kohelet 12, 3-7) began to modernize and revive: it is implied in the name, the world started to On the day that the keepers of the house modernize, it is the beginning of creation and tremble, and the mighty men are seized by innovation, and therefore the … name of the cramps, and the grinders cease since they city was first Luz, as in the core of the spine of have become few, and those who look out of man, because from there it will be shaken and the windows become darkened: And the doors renewed … because as it was a wonder that … shall be shut in the street when the sound of innovation was from there, so it is a wonder the mill is low, and one shall rise at the voice of of resurrection of the dead that will start from a bird, and all the songstresses shall be brought there. low: Also from the high places they will fear, and terrors on the road, and the almond tree From the words of rabbeinu Bechaye it appears will blossom, and the grasshopper will drag that the comparison of the tailbone of man and itself along, and longing will fail, for man goes the geographic location of Luz, shows that in both to his everlasting home, and the mourners go Luz embodies the potential to shake off, regenerate about in the street: Before the silver cord g and flower in the resurrection. And so we find in snaps, and the golden fountain is shattered, the Midrash that the city of Luz is a wonderful city and the pitcher breaks at the fountain, and the from an eternal world to which no one knew of an wheel falls shattered into the pit: And the dust entrance and therefore the Angel of Death could not returns to the earth as it was, and the spirit rule there. People who wanted to die had to leave, or returns to G-d Who gave it. they would continue to live forever. In Kohelet rabbah (12, 5) the “bone” of the almond And so it appears, from the Midrash in Breishit is called “Luz Hashidra” – “the nucleus of the spine.” rabbah (69, 8) that the early flowering of the According to Midrash, this is the bone from which almond symbolizes a Spring of the future. the body will begin to flower and return during Already now, in the dead of winter, the almond peeks, white and pink flowers appear on resurrection – Tchiyat haMeytim. a backdrop of clouds and fog. The Midrash relates that rabbi Joshua ben Hananiah The AppearancE of the Almond in the showed Hadrian how the Luz Hashidra is in fact so Dimension of Time strong that one cannot grind it, so much so that the hammer with which one tries to beat it will rupture The almond represents the bud of the future that and break – and Luz is identified with the almond. appears in the present. The future is perceived as The ritv”a in Tractate Shabbat 152a explains: a time of renewal, blossoming, and redemption. g שיח השדה SIACH HASADEh – FIELD TALK And the Almond-Tree Shall Blossom, continued JUST ONE APPLE g resurrection of the dead symbolizes rebirth for Lynn Kirsche Shapiro eternity – a future of endless time without death. So Kohelet describes how, as a person is dying, at Perhaps the following story the peak of his personal winter, when each of his explains why my mother functions weakens and the body wears out, just then has always believed in the the core of the almond (the “Luz”) from which the healing power of apples. body will flourish in the resurrection of the dead, and so too, the city Luz identified also as Beit El, is a city After she had been in that is not controlled by death. There is something in Auschwitz for six months, it from the future world. my mother was transferred to Torgau, euphemistically Perhaps this is why the Kohanim identify with the called a “work camp” because it almond tree (shaked), because they are holy and lacked gas chambers. A very dear childhood friend, uplifting men who belong to a future world. As it Hindu, was also in Auschwitz with her own mother is said about the People of Israel, that in the future they will all be holy as Kohanim. “You will be to Me a (the rebbetzin or rabbi’s wife). In order to stay with kingdom of priests and a holy nation.” It is interesting my mother, Hindu and her mother had sneaked into to note that the letters of “shaked” scrambled, spell the train that was transferring my mother to Torgau, “Kadosh.” and were brutally beaten by the Nazis for doing so. While they were in Torgau, Hindu’s mother became It is possible that there is a connection between quite ill and thought that if only she could eat an rashi, who says that the almond hurries to blossom, apple, it would help her regain her strength.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter Fourteen Rabbinic and Other Judaisms, from 70 to Ca
    Chapter Fourteen Rabbinic and Other Judaisms, from 70 to ca. 250 The war of 66-70 was as much a turning point for Judaism as it was for Christianity. In the aftermath of the war and the destruction of the Jerusalem temple Judaeans went in several religious directions. In the long run, the most significant by far was the movement toward rabbinic Judaism, on which the source-material is vast but narrow and of dubious reliability. Other than the Mishnah, Tosefta and three midrashim, almost all rabbinic sources were written no earlier than the fifth century (and many of them much later), long after the events discussed in this chapter. Our information on non-rabbinic Judaism in the centuries immediately following the destruction of the temple is scanty: here we must depend especially on archaeology, because textual traditions are almost totally lacking. This is especially regrettable when we recognize that two non-rabbinic traditions of Judaism were very widespread at the time. Through at least the fourth century the Hellenistic Diaspora and the non-rabbinic Aramaic Diaspora each seem to have included several million Judaeans. Also of interest, although they were a tiny community, are Jewish Gnostics of the late first and second centuries. The end of the Jerusalem temple meant also the end of the Sadducees, for whom the worship of Adonai had been limited to sacrifices at the temple. The great crowds of pilgrims who traditionally came to the city for the feasts of Passover, Weeks and Tabernacles were no longer to be seen, and the temple tax from the Diaspora that had previously poured into Jerusalem was now diverted to the temple of Jupiter Capitolinus in Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • Beit Shammai & Beit Hillel
    Beit Shammai & Beit Hillel: Two Fundamentally Different Approaches to Chanukah Rabbi Joshua Flug Director of Torah Research, Yeshiva University’s Center for the Jewish Future One of the more famous disputes between Beit Shammai and Beit Hillel is regarding the practice of the extremely scrupulous (mehadrin min hamehadrin) on Chanukah. מצות חנוכה נר איש וביתו Our Rabbis taught: The precept of Chanukah [demands] one light for a והמהדרין נר לכל אחד ואחד man and his household; the scrupulous [kindle] a light for each member [of והמהדרין מן המהדרין בית שמאי :the household]; and the extremely scrupulous, — Beit Shammai maintain אומרים יום ראשון מדליק שמנה On the first day eight lights are lit and thereafter they are gradually מכאן ואילך פוחת והולך ובית הלל reduced; but Beit Hillel say: On the first day one is lit and thereafter they אומרים יום ראשון מדליק אחת are progressively increased. Ulla said: In the West [Palestine] two מכאן ואילך מוסיף והולך אמר amoraim, R. Yosi b. Avin and R. Yosi b. Zevida, differ therein: one עולא פליגי בה תרי אמוראי במערבא ר' יוסי בר אבין ור' יוסי maintains, the reason of Beit Shammai is that it shall correspond to the בר זבידא חד אמר טעמא דב"ש days still to come, and that of Beit Hillel is that it shall correspond to the כנגד ימים הנכנסין וטעמא דב"ה days that are gone; but another maintains: Beit Shammai's reason is that it כנגד ימים היוצאין וחד אמר טעמא shall correspond to the bulls of the Festival and Beit Hillel's reason is that דב"ש כנגד פרי החג וטעמא דבית .we promote in [matters of] sanctity but do not reduce הלל דמעלין בקדש ואין מורידין.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender in Jewish Studies
    Gender in Jewish Studies Proceedings of the Sherman Conversations 2017 Volume 13 (2019) GUEST EDITOR Katja Stuerzenhofecker & Renate Smithuis ASSISTANT EDITOR Lawrence Rabone A publication of the Centre for Jewish Studies, University of Manchester, United Kingdom. Co-published by © University of Manchester, UK. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this volume may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher, the University of Manchester, and the co-publisher, Gorgias Press LLC. All inquiries should be addressed to the Centre for Jewish Studies, University of Manchester (email: [email protected]). Co-Published by Gorgias Press LLC 954 River Road Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA Internet: www.gorgiaspress.com Email: [email protected] ISBN 978-1-4632-4056-1 ISSN 1759-1953 This volume is printed on acid-free paper that meets the American National Standard for Permanence of paper for Printed Library Materials. Printed in the United States of America Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies is distributed electronically free of charge at www.melilahjournal.org Melilah is an interdisciplinary Open Access journal available in both electronic and book form concerned with Jewish law, history, literature, religion, culture and thought in the ancient, medieval and modern eras. Melilah: A Volume of Studies was founded by Edward Robertson and Meir Wallenstein, and published (in Hebrew) by Manchester University Press from 1944 to 1955. Five substantial volumes were produced before the series was discontinued; these are now available online.
    [Show full text]
  • Haggadah SUPPLEMENT
    Haggadah SUPPLEMENT Historical Legal Textual Seder Ritualistic Cultural Artistic [email protected] • [email protected] Seder 1) Joseph Tabory, PhD, JPS Haggadah 2 cups of wine before the meal ; 2 cups of wine after the meal (with texts read over each pair); Hallel on 2nd cup, immediately before meal; more Hallel on 4th cup, immediately after meal; Ha Lachma Anya – wish for Jerusalem in Aramaic - opens the seder; L’Shana HaBa’ah BiYerushalyaim – wish for Jerusalem in Hebrew - closes it; Aramaic passage (Ha Lachma Anya) opens the evening; Aramaic passage (Had Gadya) closes the evening; 4 questions at the beginning of the seder; 13 questions at the end (Ehad Mi Yode‘a); Two litanies in the haggadah: the Dayenu before the meal and Hodu after the meal. 2) Joshua Kulp, PhD, The Origins of the Seder and Haggadah, 2005, p2 Three main forces stimulated the rabbis to develop innovative seder ritual and to generate new, relevant exegeses to the biblical Passover texts: (1) the twin calamities of the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple and the Bar-Kokhba revolt; (2) competition with emerging Christian groups; (3) assimilation of Greco-Roman customs and manners. 2nd Seder 3) David Galenson, PhD, Old Masters and Young Geniuses There have been two very different types of artist in the modern era…I call one of these methods aesthetically motivated experimentation, and the other conceptual execution. Artists who have produced experimental innovations have been motivated by aesthetic criteria: they have aimed at presenting visual perceptions. Their goals are imprecise… means that these artists rarely feel they have succeeded, and their careers are consequently often dominated by the pursuit of a single objective.
    [Show full text]
  • Cohen V. Facebook
    Case 1:16-cv-04453-NGG-LB Document 1-1 Filed 08/10/16 Page 1 of 113 PageID #: 70 EXHIBIT A Case 1:16-cv-04453-NGG-LB Document 1-1 Filed 08/10/16 Page 2 of 113 PageID #: 71 ~ SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Index No: Pa~1, / l 5 RICHARD LAKIN; and additional plaintiffs listed on Rider A, Date Purchased: 10/~(~C~/ 15 Plaintiffs designate Kings County as the Plaintiffs, place of trial. The basis of vcnue is CPLR 503(a), -against- SUMMONS FA=CEBOOK, Q Plaintiffs residcs at: Defendant. c/o Shurat HaDin — Israel Law Center, 10 ---------------------------------------------- X flata'as Street, Ramat Gan, Israel TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANTS: YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the complaint in this action and to serve a copy of your answer, on the plaintiff s Attorneys within 20 days afi.er the service of this summons, exclusive ot'the day of service (or within 30 days aftcr scrvice is complctc if this summons is not personally delivered to you within the State ofNew York) and to file a copy of your answer with the Clerk of the above-named Court; and in case of your failure to appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the complaint. Dated: Brooklyn, New York Octobcr 26, 2015 Yours, THE BERKMAN LAW OFFICE, LLC 0~ ~ ~ Atull~,r~.Jor he~+f zti/r ~ S`~ a by: 7 +~ '/ ° O' Q _.J Robert J. 111 Livingston Street, Suite 1928 Brooklyn, New York 11201 (718) 855-3627 ZECIA L 1 STS \~ NITSANA DARSHAN-LEITNER & CO Nitsana Darshan-Leitner .
    [Show full text]
  • Scholarly Lineage of Prominent Tannaim
    Source Sheet Class 3-2000 Years of Jewish History-Rabbi Menachem Levine Source 1 Scholarly lineage of prominent tannaim Rabbis of the Mishnah : Chronology & Hierarchy Teacher→Student Father→Son Hillel Shammai Gamaliel the Johanan b. Zakai Elder R. Jose the Eliezer b. Joshua b. Eleazar b. Eleazar b. Gamaliel Galilean Hyrcanus Hananiah Arach Azariah Elisha b. Ishmael Akiva Tarfon Abuyah b. Elisha Shimon b. Nathan Meir Judah b. Ilai Jose b. Halafta Yohai Judah Hiyya Oshiah haNasi Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tannaim Source 2 The Oral Torah was originally meant to be transmitted by word of mouth. It was transmitted from master to student in such a manner that if the student had any question, he would be able to ask, and thus avoid ambiguity. A written text, on the other hand, no matter how perfect, is always subject to misinterpretation…. If the entire Torah would have been given in writing, everyone would be able to interpret it as he desired. This would lead to division and discord among people who followed the Torah in different ways. The Oral Torah, on the other hand, would require a central authority to preserve it, thus assuring the unity of Israel. Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan, Handbook of Jewish Thought, Moznaim 1979, p.179 Source 3 12 Our Holy Teacher wrote the Mishnah. From the time of Moshe to Our Holy Teacher, no one had written a work from which the Oral Law was publicly taught. Rather, in each generation, the head of the then existing court or the prophet of the time wrote down for his private use notes on the traditions he had heard from his teachers, and he taught in public from memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Wij-Articles- Final Version of a Spirited Chavruta
    Spirituality, Textual Study and Gender at Nishmat: A Spirited Chavruta Spirituality, Textual Study and Gender at Nishmat: A Spirited Chavruta Deidre Butler, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Abstract Based on ethnographic research with Jewish women participating in the summer program at Nishmat: The Jerusalem Center for Advanced Jewish Study for Women, this paper explores religion, spirituality, gender and feminism as a conceptual cluster of highly contested and contingent terms. This project explores the attitudes and motivations of a unique group of Jewish women as an opportunity to disrupt received oppositions between religion and spirituality and to think critically about the ways that feminism, and particularly Jewish feminism, plays out in Jewish women’s self-understanding as gendered, spiritual, and/or religious persons. This project explores the attitudes and motivations of a unique group of Jewish women as an opportunity to disrupt received oppositions between religion and spirituality and to think critically about the ways that feminism, and particularly Jewish feminism, plays out in this group of Jewish women’s self-understanding as gendered, spiritual, and/or religious persons. Based on ethnographic research with Jewish women participating in the 2007 summer program at Nishmat: The Jerusalem Center for Advanced Jewish Study for Women, this paper explores religion, spirituality, gender and feminism as a conceptual cluster of highly contested and contingent terms. Nishmat: Tradition, and Women’s Textual Study Nishmat
    [Show full text]
  • Bruriah BRILLIANCE in BINAH
    OMAN’S POW A W ER Bruriah BRILLIANCE IN BINAH Leah Rachel Devorah Chana Esther Bruriah DIGNITY SACRIFICE LEADERSHIP PRAYER MODESTY UNDERSTANDING BRURIA- BRILLIANCE IN BINAH WHO IS BRURIAH? Family History Her father was the famous Rabbi Hanina ben Teradyon, the Talmud speaks of Bruriah standing next to her father as he is being slowly burnt to death by the Romans because he had violated the Roman ban on the study or teaching of the Torah in public places. Her father's death was a dramatic public affair. He was wrapped in the Torah scroll which was set afire but the Roman soldiers applied water soaked wool over his heart so as to keep him alive as long as possible. It was reported that his attitude was heroic and that even the executioner was moved by it. The executioner is said to have called out to the Rabbi asking that if he stopped the wet wool sponges, would the Rabbi assure him of entry into the World to Come. Hanina ben Teradyon gave him the assurance and the executioner took away the wool sponges and raised the flame. After the death of Hainin ben Terdyou, the executioner jumped into the flames and died also. Bruriah is one of the few women mentioned in the Gemara. She was married to Rabbi Meir and is recognized as a Talmidah Chachama in her own right. תלמוד בבלי מסכת פסחים דף סב עמוד ב Talmud Bavli: Pesachim 62b רבי שמלאי אתא לקמיה דרבי יוחנן, אמר ליה: ניתני R' Simlai came before R' Yochanan, and he לי מר ספר יוחסין.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Homoerotic Sexual Activity – Sources
    Feminist Sexual Ethics Project Gail Labovitz Senior Research Analyst, Feminist Sexual Ethics Project Female Homoerotic Sexual Activity – Sources: The sources addressing female homoerotic sexual activity in rabbinic literature (link to glossary) are very few, and far less clear than those regarding sexual activity between men. There is a great deal of ambiguity in these texts as to what activities are forbidden, the consequences for women who engage in them, and the nature (that is, the source and/or the authority) of whatever prohibition does exist. Reading these sources suggests several potential reasons why rabbinic thinking on female homoerotic sexual activity is less developed than regarding male homoeroticism; these possibilities will be discussed in the course of the analysis of the texts below. Tannaitic Midrash There is no direct prohibition on female homoerotic sexual activity in the Hebrew bible, indeed, no explicit discussion of such activity at all. Biblical laws of forbidden sexual couplings (notably Leviticus 18 and 20) are generally addressed to male listeners/readers. With the exception of the prohibition against bestiality (Leviticus 18:23 and 20:15-16), in which the prohibition against women committing this act follows on the prohibition to men,1 sexual acts which do not involve male participants are not discussed. Nor do the Mishnah (link to glossary) or the Tosefta (link to glossary) discuss sexual acts between women in any way. Only one midrashic (link to glossary) text from this period addresses any form of homoeroticism between women. As midrash, that is, as a form of exegesis of scriptural text, to Leviticus 18:3, this passage thus invokes the authority of scripture for its discourse on female homoeroticism; it links marriage between two women to the practices of the Canaanites and Egyptians, which this verse and numerous others explicitly forbid, as well as to a number of other sexual/marital connections explicitly or implicitly forbidden in scripture [cite the verse?].
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Pluralism: a Conversation Wednesday February 19, 2020, 7:30 Pm
    Religious Pluralism: A Conversation Wednesday February 19, 2020, 7:30 pm Jewish Community Day School of RI 85 Taft Ave, Providence JCDSRI, Congregation Beth Sholom,Temple Beth-El, and Temple Emanu-El invite you to a facilitated conversation between Professor Guy Ben-Porat and Rabbanit Avital Engelberg about Jewish pluralism in Israel and its impact on civil society. Professor Guy Ben-Porat is professor and department chairperson at the Department of Politics and Government at the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel. He is an award-winning educator and the author of Global Liberalism, Local Populism (2006), which won the Ernst-Otto Czempiel Award of the Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, Between State and Synagogue (Cambridge, 2012), which was awarded the Shapiro Best Book Award and the Israeli Political Science Association Best Book Award. Most recently, he has published Policing Citizens: Minority Policy in Israel. Professor Ben-Porat received his Ph.D from Johns Hopkins University and his research currently focuses on the politics of conflicts, policy making, and church-state relations. Rabbanit Avital Engelberg currently serves as the Director of Spiritual Engagement at Congregation Beth Sholom and is the 5th grade Judaic's teacher at the Jewish Community Day School of RI. Rabbanit Avital is a graduate of the Advanced Kollel at Yeshivat Maharat in the Bronx, New York, the first Orthodox institution in North America to ordain Orthodox women. In Israel, Rabbanit Avital has taught Talmud at various Jewish educational institutions and was a fellow of the Halakhic Studies program at Midreshet Lindenbaum, a Jewish educational institution for women in Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]
  • Judah Ha-Nasi Judaism
    JUDAH HA-NASI JUDAH HA-NASI al. Since the publication of his Mishnah at the end of the second or beginning of the third century, the primary pur- Head of Palestinian Jewry and codifier of the MISH- suit of Jewish sages has been commenting on its contents. NAH; b. probably in Galilee, c. 135; d. Galilee, c. 220. Judah was the son of Simeon II ben Gamaliel II, who was See Also: TALMUD. the grandson of GAMALIEL (mentioned in Acts 5.34; Bibliography: W. BACHER, The Jewish Encyclopedia. ed. J. 22.3), who was in turn the grandson of Hillel. As the pa- SINGER (New York 1901–06) 7:333–33. D. J. BORNSTEIN, Encyclo- triarch or head of Palestinian Jewry, Judah received as a paedia Judaica: Das Judentum in Geschichte und Gegenwart. permanent epithet the title ha-Nasi (the Prince), original- (Berlin 1928–34) 8:1023–35. L. LAZARUS, Universal Jewish Ency- clopedia (New York 1939–44) 6: 229–230. K. SCHUBERT, Lexikon ly given to the president of the Great Sanhedrin in Jerusa- für Theologie und Kirche, ed. J. HOFER and K. RAHNER (Freiberg lem. In the Mishnah he is referred to simply as Rabbi (the 1957–65) 5:889. A. GUTTMANN, ‘‘The Patriarch Judah I: His Birth teacher par excellence), and in the GEMARAH he is often and Death,’’ Hebrew Union College Annual 25 (1954) 239–261. called Rabbenu (our teacher) or Rabbenu ha-kadosh (our [M. J. STIASSNY] saintly teacher). He was instructed in the HALAKAH of the Oral Law by the most famous rabbis of his time, but he summed up his experience as a student, and later as a teacher, in the words: ‘‘Much of the Law have I learned JUDAISM from my teachers, more from my colleagues, but most of The term Judaism admits of various meanings.
    [Show full text]
  • Surviving Surviving,” Prepared As a Class Assignment by HAFTR Eighth Grader Joe Klein
    The Jewish Star Independent and original reporting from the Orthodox communities of Long Island VOL. 8, NO. 25 JUNE 19, 2009 | 27 SIVAN 5769 www.thejewishstar.com GET OUTTA TOWN INWOOD CAMPUS A RELIGIOUS EXCHANGE OU fair highlights Jewish communities Bnot Shulamith gains zoning approval The Kosher Bookworm Page 3 Page 6 Page 8 IN MY VIEW Tuition by Iran is not a the nickel democracy Internet toolbar will help fund Jewish education BY MICAH D. HALPERN BY YAFFI SPODEK mericans have been duped, An easy opportunity to help your school raise hoodwinked by mainstream money may be only a mouse-click away thanks to a new media, fed false hope and pro- fundraising venture from the Orthodox Union. A vided with erroneous informa- For every single click on the OU’s Education Fund tion. Toolbar — scheduled to launch in the next few weeks I need to set the record straight. — a corporate sponsor will donate five cents to the OU Iran is not a democracy. Education Fund, which will be distributed to yeshivot Because the Iranians use the and day schools around the coun- terms and adopt the trappings of try. democracy, does not make it a democ- “Our goal is to send the tool- racy. Because the American media bar to every Jewish home in would like Iran to be a democracy, America,” said Rabbi Saul Zucker, does not make it a democracy. Because director of the OU’s recently the White House developed department of day school and educational services. wishes for a Image courtesy Joe Klein “The toolbar gets loaded onto democratically Yetta, a Holocaust survivor briefly overcome with grief, during an interview in the documentary run Iran, does your desktop and it costs the user “Surviving Surviving,” prepared as a class assignment by HAFTR eighth grader Joe Klein.
    [Show full text]