Arxiv:1601.03499V1 [Quant-Ph] 14 Jan 2016 Networks [23]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Non-Hermitian tight-binding network engineering Stefano Longhi Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Milano and Istituto di Fotonica e Nanotecnologie del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Piazza L. da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milano, Italy We suggest a simple method to engineer a tight-binding quantum network based on proper coupling to an auxiliary non-Hermitian cluster. In particular, it is shown that effective complex non-Hermitian hopping rates can be realized with only complex on-site energies in the network. Three applications of the Hamiltonian engineering method are presented: the synthesis of a nearly transparent defect in an Hermitian linear lattice; the realization of the Fano-Anderson model with complex coupling; and the synthesis of a PT -symmetric tight-binding lattice with a bound state in the continuum. PACS numbers: 03.65.-w, 11.30.Er, 72.20.Ee, 42.82.Et I. INTRODUCTION self-sustained emission in semi-infinite non-Hermitian systems at the exceptional point [29], optical simulation of PT -symmetric quantum field theories in the ghost Hamiltonian engineering is a powerful technique regime [30, 31], invisible defects in tight-binding lattices to control classical and quantum phenomena with [32], non-Hermitian bound states in the continuum [33], important applications in many areas of physics such and Bloch oscillations with trajectories in complex plane as quantum control [1{4], quantum state transfer and [34]. Previous proposals to implement complex hopping quantum information processing [5{10], quantum simu- amplitudes are based on fast temporal modulations of lation [11{13], and topological phases of matter [14{19]. complex on-site energies [31, 32], however such methods In quantum systems described by a tight-binding are rather challenging in practice and, as a matter of Hamiltonian, quantum engineering is usually aimed at fact, to date there is not any experimental demonstration tailoring and controlling hopping rates and site energies, of non-Hermitian complex couplings in tight-binding using either static or dynamic methods. For example, networks. special tailoring of the hopping rates in a linear tight- binding chain allows one to realize perfect state transfer In this work we suggest a simple method to engineer between distant sites in the chain [6, 9, 20], whereas hopping amplitudes and site energies in a tight-binding external time-dependent perturbations represent a network, which simply involves Hermitian couplings and rich and versatile resource to realize synthetic gauge no synthetic gauge fields. The method is based on proper fields, thus achieving topological phases in systems that coupling of the main tight-binding network to an auxil- are topologically trivial in equilibrium [15{19]. The iary non-Hermitian cluster. In particular, it is shown that recent growing interest in non-Hermitian quantum and effective complex (non-Hermitian) hopping rates can be classical systems [21], especially in those possessing PT realized with only static on-site complex potentials in the symmetry [22], has motivated the extension of quantum network, i.e. avoiding fast modulation and thus greatly control methods and Hamiltonian engineering into the simplifying its practical implementation. Three applica- non-Hermitian realm [23{27], with ramifications and tions of the tight-binding network engineering method important applications to e.g. PT -symmetric integrated are presented: the synthesis of a nearly invisible defect photonic devices [28]. The ability to tailor complex on- in an Hermitian tight-binding linear lattice; the realiza- site potentials and non-Hermitian hopping amplitudes is tion of the Fano-Anderson model with complex coupling; a key task in the engineering of non-Hermitian quantum and the synthesis of a PT -symmetric tight-binding lat- tice with a bound state in the continuum. arXiv:1601.03499v1 [quant-ph] 14 Jan 2016 networks [23]. While the engineering of complex on-site potentials is a rather feasible task, the realization of complex hopping amplitudes remains a rather chal- lenging issue. For example, in optics non-Hermitian II. NETWORK ENGINEERING METHOD tight-binding networks with complex on-site potentials are readily implemented by evanescent coupling of light Let us consider a rather general tight-binding network modes trapped in optical waveguides or resonators with S, which is constructed topologically by N sites jniS and optical gain and loss in them, while the realization the various connections between them. As a simplified of controllable non-Hermitian coupling constants is model, it captures the essential features of many discrete a much less trivial task. However, complex hopping classical and quantum systems [23]. To engineer the hop- amplitudes play an important role for the observation of ping rates and site potentials of the network S, we con- a wide variety of phenomena that have been disclosed sider an auxiliary cluster A, with M sites jαiA, which is in recent works [24, 29{34]. These include incoherent coupled to the main network S [Fig.1(a)]. As a limiting control of non-Hermitian Bose-Hubbard dimers [24], case, the network S can comprise an infinite number of 2 sites, for example it can describe an infinitely-extended To obtain the dynamical behavior of the system solely, one-dimensional tight-binding lattice, side coupled to the one might try to proceed by elimination of the auxiliary auxiliary cluster A. The tight-binding Hamiltonian of the amplitudes aα(t) from Eqs.(6) and (7), thus obtaining full system S+A is given by coupled integro-differential equations for the system am- plitudes c (t) (see Appendix A). However, such a proce- H^ = H^ + H^ + H^ (1) n S A I dure turns out to be useful in defining an effective energy- ^ where independent Hamiltonian Heff for the system S when- M ever the auxiliary system A is an almost continuum of X (S) X (A) states (i.e. M ! 1) and the S-A coupling is weak. In- H^S = H jniShmjS ; H^A = H jαiAhβjA n;m α,β deed, this is the usual way to describe metastability of n;m α,β=1 (2) Markovian open quantum systems (see, for instance, [35{ are the Hamiltonians of the main (S) and auxiliary (A) 37]). Here, however, we typically consider a finite (and networks, respectively, and possibly small) number of auxiliary sites M, a typical infinitely-extended system S (N ! 1), and do not nec- M essarily require the S-A coupling to be weak. In such a ^ X X HI = (ρα,njαiAhnjS +ρ ~n,αjniShαjA) (3) case, the reduction procedure of open quantum systems α=1 n and derivation of an effective Hamiltonian can be applied describes their interaction. In the above equations, the under certain conditions solely, which are discussed in the roman and greek indices run over the sites of main net- Appendix A. For our purposes, we follow here a different work S and auxiliary cluster A, respectively, the ma- strategy. Let us look for an eigenstate of H^ with energy trix H(S) describes on-site potentials (diagonal elements E, which can be either a bound state or a scattered state (S) when N = 1. Assuming the dependence ∼ exp(−iEt) Hn;n) and hopping amplitudes (off-diagonal elements (S) for the amplitudes in Eqs.(6) and (7), one obtains Hn;m, n 6= m) among the various sites of the main sys- (A) tem S, and the M × M matrix H is the analogous Ec = H(S)c +ρ ~a (8) matrix for the auxiliary system. The two matrices ρ and (A) ρ~, entering in Eq.(3), describe the interaction between Ea = H a + ρc; (9) the sites of S and A. We assume that the hopping rates T where c = (:::; c−1; c0; c1; c2; :::) and a = among the different sites in both main (S) and auxiliary T (a1; a2; a3; :::; aM ) are the vectors of S and A site (A) networks are Hermitian and that there are not gauge amplitudes. After elimination of the amplitudes a, one fields that introduce Peierls' phases in the hopping ampli- obtains tudes. Such an assumption implies that the non-diagonal elements of the matrices H(S) and H(A), and all the ele- Ec = Heff (E)c; (10) ments of the matrices ρ andρ ~, are real, with ρα,n =ρ ~n,α, (S) (S) (A) (A) where we have set Hn;m = Hm;n and Hα,β = Hβ,α i.e. T (S) (S) T (A) (A) T (S) (A) −1 ρ~ = ρ ; H = H ; H = H : (4) Heff (E) ≡ H +ρ ~(E − H ) ρ. (11) (S) (A) However, site potentials Hn;n and Hα,α , in either or both Equation (11) shows that the effect of the auxiliary clus- the main and auxiliary networks, are allowed to be com- ter A is to renormalize the hopping amplitudes and site plex. Note that, if the auxiliary cluster is made of purely potentials of the network S by adding, to the Hamilto- (A) (S) dissipative sites, i.e. the imaginary parts of Hα,α are nian H , a generally energy-dependent term [the second either zero or negative, the eigenvalues of H(A) have neg- term on the right hand side of Eq.(11)]. Such an addi- ative (or vanishing) imaginary parts, and secularly grow- tional term is analogous to the so-called 'optical poten- ing terms of the auxiliary site amplitudes are avoided in tial' found in the effective Hamiltonian description of de- the weak coupling regime ρ ! 0. After expanding the caying open quantum systems using the Feshbach's pro- state vector of the full system as jection operator method [36]. Interestingly, the optical potential term generally M X X makes the off-diagonal elements of Heff complex, i.e. the j (t)i = cn(t)jniS + aα(t)jαiA; (5) effective hopping amplitudes are non-Hermitian in spite n α=1 all hopping amplitudes in the network and auxiliary clus- from the Schr¨odingerequation i@tj (t)i = H^ j i one ob- ter are Hermitian.