DOCSLIB.ORG

Texas Mangrove Research Symposium

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Texas Mangrove Research Symposium Texas Mangrove Thursday, February 28 9:00am - 5:00pm University of Texas Marine Science Institute Research Symposium PortEstuarine Aransas, Research Texas Center, Seminar Room 750 Channel View Dr. AGENDA 9:00 - 9:15 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS 9:15 - 9:30 Dr. Kiersten Madden, Mission-Aransas National Estuarine Research Reserve Monitoring Mangroves: Applying the National Estuarine Research Reserve Approach to Texas 9:30 - 10:00 Tom Tremblay, Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin Baseline Mapping for Mangrove Monitoring in the Coastal Bend, Texas Gulf Coast 10:00 - 10:30 Dr. James Gibeaut, Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi Proposed Observatory for Understanding Coastal Wetland Change 10:30 - 10:45 BREAK 10:45 - 11:15 Dr. John Schalles, Creighton University The Mangroves of Redfish Bay: Field surveys and high resolution imagery to map distribution, canopy 11:15 - 11:45 Chrisheight, Wilson, and vegetation University response of Texas to the February,Marine Science 2011 freeze Institute Rhizophora mangle) trees along the coast of Texas 11:45 - 12:15 Dr.Colonization Anna Armitage, and age structure Texas A&M of red University mangrove ( – Galveston Ecological implications of black mangrove expansion into Texas salt marshes: Comparisons among 12:15 - 1:00 CATEREDmarsh and mangroveLUNCH habitats 1:00 - 1:30 Dr. Steven Pennings, University of Houston Ecological implications of black mangrove expansion into Texas salt marshes: Insights from a large- 1:30 - 2:00 Dr.scale Liz mangrove Smith, Internationalremoval experiment Crane Foundation 2:00 - 2:30 Dr.Habitat Rusty replacement Feagin, Texas by mangrove A&M University establishment: - College Implications Station for Whooping Crane use Carbon Sequestration in Coastal Wetlands Historical Reconstruction of Mangrove Expansion in the Gulf of Mexico: Linking Climate Change with 2:30 - 2:45 BREAK Texas Mangrove Thursday, February 28 9:00am - 5:00pm University of Texas Marine Science Institute Research Symposium PortEstuarine Aransas, Research Texas Center, Seminar Room 750 Channel View Dr. AGENDA 2:45 - 4:00 U.S. Geological Survey National Wetlands Research Center Tom Doyle, USGS National Wetlands Research Center Modeling mangrove structure and spread across the Northern Gulf Coast under climate change: RichardEffects of storms,Day, USGS sea-level National rise, freshwater Wetlands flow, Research and freeze. Center KenBiogeography Krauss, ofUSGS black National mangrove Wetlands and freeze Research tolerance Center ErikWater Yando, use characteristics University of of black Louisiana mangroves at Lafayette along the Northern Gulf Coast The belowground implications of mangrove forest migration: Plant-soil variability across forest Mikestructural Osland, gradients USGS in National TX, LA, and Wetlands FL Research Center 4:00 - 4:30 DISCUSSIONWinter climate change and coastal wetland foundation species: Salt marshes vs. mangrove forests 4:30 - 4:45 WRAP UP AND ADJOURN Initials Name Organization/Af�iliation Email INVITED SPEAKERS AA Anna Armitage Texas A&M University – Galveston [email protected] RD Richard Day USGS National Wetlands Research Center [email protected] TD Tom Doyle USGS National Wetlands Research Center [email protected] RF Rusty Feagin Texas A&M University – College Station [email protected] JG James Gibeaut Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi [email protected] KK Ken Krauss USGS National Wetlands Research Center [email protected] KM Kiersten Madden Mission-Aransas National Estuarine Research [email protected] Reserve MO Mike Osland USGS National Wetlands Research Center [email protected] SP Steve Pennings University of Houston [email protected] JS John Schalles Creighton University [email protected] LS Liz Smith International Crane Foundation [email protected] TT Tom Tremblay Bureau of Economic Geology – UT Austin [email protected] EY Erik Yando University of Louisiana at Lafayette [email protected] WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS DA Dan Alonso San Antonio Bay Partnership [email protected] KB Karen Bishop Texas Sea Grant [email protected] JB Jorge Brenner The Nature Conservancy [email protected] EB Ed Buskey Mission-Aransas NERR [email protected] RC Rhonda Cummins Texas Sea Grant [email protected] KD Kelly Darnell Univ. of Texas Marine Science Institute [email protected] ZD Zack Darnell Mission-Aransas NERR [email protected] SD Sayantani Dastidar University of Houston [email protected] MAD Mary Ann Davis The Aquarium at Rockport Harbor [email protected] ND Nicole Davis Texas State University [email protected] RD Richard Davis Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi [email protected] Sarah Douglas Univ. of Texas Marine Science Institute [email protected] CG Catalina Gempeler Univ. of Texas Marine Science Institute [email protected] HG Hongyu Guo University of Houston [email protected] BH Beau Hardegree US Fish and Wildlife Service [email protected] WH Wade Harrell US Fish and Wildlife Service [email protected] KH Kent Hicks Texas Parks and Wildlife Department [email protected] LH Lauren Hutchison Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi [email protected] CH Cammie Hyatt Mission-Aransas NERR [email protected] FK Felix Keeley City of Rockport/NERR Advisory Board [email protected] Ranjani Wasantha Texas A&M University – College Station [email protected] Kulawardhana JL Jessica Lunt Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi [email protected] SM Shanna Madsen Mission-Aransas NERR [email protected] DN Duncan Neblett Univ. of Texas Marine Science Institute DO R. Deborah Overath Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi [email protected] PR Patrick Rios City of Rockport Water Quality Committee [email protected] JR Jackie Robinson Texas Parks and Wildlife Department [email protected] CR Carolyn Rose Mission-Aransas NERR [email protected] JS James Sanchez Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi [email protected] CPS Carlota Plantier Santos Harte Research Institute, Texas A&M [email protected] University – Corpus Christi CS Chris Shank Univ. of Texas Marine Science Institute [email protected] JT Jim Tolan Texas Parks and Wildlife Department [email protected] KT Kathryn Tunnell [email protected] HW Heather Wade Texas Sea Grant/Mission-Aransas NERR [email protected] CW Carolyn Weaver TexasTexas A&M General University Land – Of�iceGalveston [email protected] DW Dawn Whitehead US Fish and Wildlife Service [email protected] AW Ashley Whitt Texas A&M University – Galveston [email protected] LW Leslie Williams Texas Parks and Wildlife Department [email protected] DY David Yoskowitz Harte Research Institute, Texas A&M [email protected] University – Corpus Christi Texas Mangrove Thursday, February 28 9:00am - 5:00pm University of Texas Marine Science Institute Research Symposium PortEstuarine Aransas, Research Texas Center, Seminar Room 750 Channel View Dr. AGENDA 9:00 - 9:15 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS 9:15 - 9:30 Dr. Kiersten Madden, Mission-Aransas National Estuarine Research Reserve Monitoring Mangroves: Applying the National Estuarine Research Reserve Approach to Texas 9:30 - 10:00 Tom Tremblay, Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin Baseline Mapping for Mangrove Monitoring in the Coastal Bend, Texas Gulf Coast 10:00 - 10:30 Dr. James Gibeaut, Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi Proposed Observatory for Understanding Coastal Wetland Change 10:30 - 10:45 BREAK 10:45 - 11:15 Dr. John Schalles, Creighton University The Mangroves of Redfish Bay: Field surveys and high resolution imagery to map distribution, canopy 11:15 - 11:45 Chrisheight, Wilson, and vegetation University response of Texas to the February,Marine Science 2011 freeze Institute Rhizophora mangle) trees along the coast of Texas 11:45 - 12:15 Dr.Colonization Anna Armitage, and age structure Texas A&M of red University mangrove ( – Galveston Ecological implications of black mangrove expansion into Texas salt marshes: Comparisons among 12:15 - 1:00 CATEREDmarsh and mangroveLUNCH habitats 1:00 - 1:30 Dr. Steven Pennings, University of Houston Ecological implications of black mangrove expansion into Texas salt marshes: Insights from a large- 1:30 - 2:00 Dr.scale Liz mangrove Smith, Internationalremoval experiment Crane Foundation 2:00 - 2:30 Dr.Habitat Rusty replacement Feagin, Texas by mangrove A&M University establishment: - College Implications Station for Whooping Crane use Carbon Sequestration in Coastal Wetlands Historical Reconstruction of Mangrove Expansion in the Gulf of Mexico: Linking Climate Change with 2:30 - 2:45 BREAK Texas Mangrove Thursday, February 28 9:00am - 5:00pm University of Texas Marine Science Institute Research Symposium PortEstuarine Aransas, Research Texas Center, Seminar Room 750 Channel View Dr. AGENDA 2:45 - 4:00 U.S. Geological Survey National Wetlands Research Center Tom Doyle, USGS National Wetlands Research Center Modeling mangrove structure and spread across the Northern Gulf Coast under climate change: RichardEffects of storms,Day, USGS sea-level National rise, freshwater Wetlands flow, Research and freeze. Center KenBiogeography Krauss, ofUSGS black National mangrove Wetlands and freeze Research tolerance Center ErikWater Yando, use characteristics University of of black Louisiana mangroves at Lafayette along the Northern Gulf Coast The belowground
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan
    The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Habitats and Associated Birds in California A Project of California Partners in Flight and PRBO Conservation Science The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Habitats and Associated Birds in California Version 2.0 2004 Conservation Plan Authors Grant Ballard, PRBO Conservation Science Mary K. Chase, PRBO Conservation Science Tom Gardali, PRBO Conservation Science Geoffrey R. Geupel, PRBO Conservation Science Tonya Haff, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at Museum of Natural History Collections, Environmental Studies Dept., University of CA) Aaron Holmes, PRBO Conservation Science Diana Humple, PRBO Conservation Science John C. Lovio, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, U.S. Navy (Currently at TAIC, San Diego) Mike Lynes, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at Hastings University) Sandy Scoggin, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at San Francisco Bay Joint Venture) Christopher Solek, Cal Poly Ponoma (Currently at UC Berkeley) Diana Stralberg, PRBO Conservation Science Species Account Authors Completed Accounts Mountain Quail - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Greater Roadrunner - Pete Famolaro, Sweetwater Authority Water District. Coastal Cactus Wren - Laszlo Szijj and Chris Solek, Cal Poly Pomona. Wrentit - Geoff Geupel, Grant Ballard, and Mary K. Chase, PRBO Conservation Science. Gray Vireo - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Black-chinned Sparrow - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Costa's Hummingbird (coastal) - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Sage Sparrow - Barbara A. Carlson, UC-Riverside Reserve System, and Mary K. Chase. California Gnatcatcher - Patrick Mock, URS Consultants (San Diego). Accounts in Progress Rufous-crowned Sparrow - Scott Morrison, The Nature Conservancy (San Diego).
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Shrubland and Young Forest Habitat Management
    7. SHRUBLAND AND YOUNG FOREST HABITAT MANAGEMENT hrublands” and “Young Forest” are terms that apply to areas Shrubland habitat and that are transitioning to mature forest and are dominated by young forest differ in “Sseedlings, saplings, and shrubs with interspersed grasses and forbs (herbaceous plants). While some sites such as wetlands, sandy sites vegetation types and and ledge areas can support a relatively stable shrub cover, most shrub communities in the northeast are successional and change rapidly to food and cover they mature forest if left unmanaged. Shrub and young forest habitats in Vermont provide important habitat provide, as well as functions for a variety of wildlife including shrubland birds, butterflies and bees, black bear, deer, moose, snowshoe hare, bobcat, as well as a where and how they variety of reptiles and amphibians. Many shrubland species are in decline due to loss of habitat. Shrubland bird species in Vermont include common are maintained on the species such as chestnut-sided warbler, white-throated sparrow, ruffed grouse, Eastern towhee, American woodcock, brown thrasher, Nashville landscape. warbler, and rarer species such as prairie warbler and golden-winged warbler. These habitat types are used by 29 Vermont Species of Greatest Conservation Need. While small areas of shrub and young forest habitat can be important to some wildlife, managing large patches of 5 acres or more provides much greater benefit to the wildlife that rely on the associated habitat conditions to meet their life requirements. Birds such as the chestnut- sided warbler will use smaller areas of young forest, but less common species such as golden-winged warbler require areas of 25 acres or more.
    [Show full text]
  • Grassland to Shrubland State Transitions Enhance Carbon Sequestration in the Northern Chihuahuan Desert
    Global Change Biology Global Change Biology (2015) 21, 1226–1235, doi: 10.1111/gcb.12743 Grassland to shrubland state transitions enhance carbon sequestration in the northern Chihuahuan Desert M. D. PETRIE1 ,S.L.COLLINS1 ,A.M.SWANN2 ,P.L.FORD3 andM.E. LITVAK1 1Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, 2Department of Biology, Sevilleta LTER, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, 3USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA Abstract The replacement of native C4-dominated grassland by C3-dominated shrubland is considered an ecological state tran- sition where different ecological communities can exist under similar environmental conditions. These state transi- tions are occurring globally, and may be exacerbated by climate change. One consequence of the global increase in woody vegetation may be enhanced ecosystem carbon sequestration, although the responses of arid and semiarid ecosystems may be highly variable. During a drier than average period from 2007 to 2011 in the northern Chihuahuan À2 À1 Desert, we found established shrubland to sequester 49 g C m yr on average, while nearby native C4 grassland À À was a net source of 31 g C m 2 yr 1 over this same period. Differences in C exchange between these ecosystems were pronounced – grassland had similar productivity compared to shrubland but experienced higher C efflux via ecosys- tem respiration, while shrubland was a consistent C sink because of a longer growing season and lower ecosystem respiration. At daily timescales, rates of carbon exchange were more sensitive to soil moisture variation in grassland than shrubland, such that grassland had a net uptake of C when wet but lost C when dry.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning the Boys' Eyes Widened and They Began to New Things, and the Colorful Pair of Socks One Ask Lots of Questions
    THE CHAPARRALIAN November 16, 2009 Volume 6, Issue 3 The Chaparralian #32 Contents 3 NASCENT THOUGHTS 6 The Chaparral Habitat For Young Chaparralians Richard W. Halsey 12 Poetry of a Kindred Spirit Nancy Jordan 14 The Walking Toothbrush The Chaparralian is the quarterly journal of the California Chaparral Institute, a non-profit organization that is Bill Howell dedicated to the preservation of native shrubland ecosystems and promoting an appreciation for the natural 16 UNFOLDINGS environment through science and education. To join the Institute and receive The Chaparralian, please fill out and Cover photograph: Two boys near the mail in the slip below or join on our website. We Monkey Temple, Kathmandu, Nepal. Inside welcome unsolicited submissions to The Chaparralian. Please send to [email protected] or via post to cover photo (above left), Jaipur, India. the address below. You can find us on the web at www.californiachaparral.org All photos by Richard W. Halsey unless indicated otherwise. Editor and Publisher.......................Richard W. Halsey Please Join the California Chaparral Institute and support our research and educational efforts to help promote a better understanding of and appreciation for the remarkable biodiversity found in shrubland ecosystems, especially the chaparral! ______$35 Citizen Naturalist: The Chaparralian plus one additional benefit (check preference below). ______$55 Chaparralian: The Chaparralian plus two benefits (check preferences below). ______$100 California Grizzly Bear: The Chaparralian plus all three benefits below. _____ Signed Book: “Fire, Chaparral and Survival in Southern California” _____ DVD of the KPBS/Huell Howser’s California’s Green “Secrets of the Chaparral” show _____ Special Chaparral edition of the California Native Plant Society’s journal, Fremontia.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Mapping of World Grassland Types A
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2014) SYNTHESIS Distribution mapping of world grassland types A. P. Dixon1*, D. Faber-Langendoen2, C. Josse2, J. Morrison1 and C. J. Loucks1 1World Wildlife Fund – United States, 1250 ABSTRACT 24th Street NW, Washington, DC 20037, Aim National and international policy frameworks, such as the European USA, 2NatureServe, 4600 N. Fairfax Drive, Union’s Renewable Energy Directive, increasingly seek to conserve and refer- 7th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203, USA ence ‘highly biodiverse grasslands’. However, to date there is no systematic glo- bal characterization and distribution map for grassland types. To address this gap, we first propose a systematic definition of grassland. We then integrate International Vegetation Classification (IVC) grassland types with the map of Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW). Location Global. Methods We developed a broad definition of grassland as a distinct biotic and ecological unit, noting its similarity to savanna and distinguishing it from woodland and wetland. A grassland is defined as a non-wetland type with at least 10% vegetation cover, dominated or co-dominated by graminoid and forb growth forms, and where the trees form a single-layer canopy with either less than 10% cover and 5 m height (temperate) or less than 40% cover and 8 m height (tropical). We used the IVC division level to classify grasslands into major regional types. We developed an ecologically meaningful spatial cata- logue of IVC grassland types by listing IVC grassland formations and divisions where grassland currently occupies, or historically occupied, at least 10% of an ecoregion in the TEOW framework. Results We created a global biogeographical characterization of the Earth’s grassland types, describing approximately 75% of IVC grassland divisions with ecoregions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10. Amphibians of the Palaearctic Realm
    CHAPTER 10. AMPHIBIANS OF THE PALAEARCTIC REALM Figure 1. Summary of Red List categories Brandon Anthony, J.W. Arntzen, Sherif Baha El Din, Wolfgang Böhme, Dan Palaearctic Realm contains 6% of all globally threatened amphibians. The Palaearctic accounts for amphibians in the Palaearctic Realm. CogĄlniceanu, Jelka Crnobrnja-Isailovic, Pierre-André Crochet, Claudia Corti, for only 3% of CR species and 5% of the EN species, but 9% of the VU species. Hence, on the The percentage of species in each category Richard Griffiths, Yoshio Kaneko, Sergei Kuzmin, Michael Wai Neng Lau, basis of current knowledge, threatened Palaearctic amphibians are more likely to be in a lower is also given. Pipeng Li, Petros Lymberakis, Rafael Marquez, Theodore Papenfuss, Juan category of threat, when compared with the global distribution of threatened species amongst Manuel Pleguezuelos, Nasrullah Rastegar, Benedikt Schmidt, Tahar Slimani, categories. The percentage of DD species, 13% (62 species), is also much less than the global Max Sparreboom, ùsmail Uøurtaû, Yehudah Werner and Feng Xie average of 23%, which is not surprising given that parts of the region have been well surveyed. Red List Category Number of species Nevertheless, the percentage of DD species is much higher than in the Nearctic. Extinct (EX) 2 Two of the world’s 34 documented amphibian extinctions have occurred in this region: the Extinct in the Wild (EW) 0 THE GEOGRAPHIC AND HUMAN CONTEXT Hula Painted Frog Discoglossus nigriventer from Israel and the Yunnan Lake Newt Cynops Critically Endangered (CR) 13 wolterstorffi from around Kunming Lake in Yunnan Province, China. In addition, one Critically Endangered (EN) 40 The Palaearctic Realm includes northern Africa, all of Europe, and much of Asia, excluding Endangered species in the Palaearctic Realm is considered possibly extinct, Scutiger macu- Vulnerable (VU) 58 the southern extremities of the Arabian Peninsula, the Indian Subcontinent (south of the latus from central China.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synthetic Review of Feedbacks and Drivers of Shrub Encroachment in Arid Grasslands
    ECOHYDROLOGY Ecohydrol. 5, 520–530 (2012) Published online 20 October 2011 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/eco.259 A synthetic review of feedbacks and drivers of shrub encroachment in arid grasslands Paolo D’Odorico,1,2* Gregory S. Okin3 and Brandon T. Bestelmeyer4 1 Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA 2 Laboratory EFLUM, Faculte’ ENAC, Ecole Polytechnique Federale Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland 3 Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA 4 USDA-ARS, Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, NM, 88003, USA ABSTRACT Many arid grasslands around the world are affected by woody plant encroachment and by the replacement of a relatively continuous grass cover with shrub patches bordered by bare soil. This shift in plant community composition is often abrupt in space and time, suggesting that it is likely sustained by positive feedbacks between vegetation and environmental conditions (e.g. resource availability) or disturbance regime (e.g. fire or freeze). These feedbacks amplify the effects of drivers of shrub encroachment, i.e. of conditions favouring a shift from grass to shrub dominance (e.g. overgrazing, climate change). Here, we review some major drivers and feedbacks and identify the basic stages in the transition from grassland to shrubland. We discuss some possible scenarios of interactions between drivers and feedbacks that could explain the transition from a stage to the next and the potential irreversibility of the shift from grass to shrub dominance. We introduce a simplistic modelling framework that can integrate the various drivers to explain the emergence of bistability for shrub-encroached grassland systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings: Shrubland Dynamics -- Fire and Water
    Proceedings: Shrubland Dynamics—Fire and Water Lubbock, TX, August 10-12, 2004 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Proceedings RMRS-P-47 July 2007 Sosebee, Ronald E.; Wester, David B.; Britton, Carlton M.; McArthur, E. Durant; Kitchen, Stanley G., comps. 2007. Proceedings: Shrubland dynamics—fire and water; 2004 August 10-12; Lubbock, TX. Proceedings RMRS-P-47. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 173 p. Abstract The 26 papers in these proceedings are divided into five sections. The first two sections are an introduction and a plenary session that introduce the principles and role of the shrub life-form in the High Plains, including the changing dynamics of shrublands and grasslands during the last four plus centuries. The remaining three sections are devoted to: fire, both prescribed fire and wildfire, in shrublands and grassland-shrubland interfac- es; water and ecophysiology shrubland ecosystems; and the ecology and population biology of several shrub species. Keywords: wildland shrubs, fire, water, ecophysiology, ecology The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or any product or service. Publisher’s note: Papers in this report were reviewed by the compilers. Rocky Mountain Research Station Publishing Services reviewed papers for format and style. Authors are responsible for content. You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media. Please specify the publication title and series number.
    [Show full text]
  • Sclerophyll Forests and Woodlands
    SCLEROPHYLL FORESTS AND WOODLANDS OF THE WET TROPICS BIOREGION CLARKE © CAMPBELL Syncarpia forests and woodlands (vegetation codes 60a-60g) Syncarpia glomulifera can range from an extremely tall Facts and figures forest tree to a stunted shrub as a direct responds to its surrounding environmental conditions. Very few species Vegetation alliances demonstrate such an ability to respond to environmental Syncarpia glomulifera forests and controlling factors with such plasticity in growth form. woodlands Variations in height are typically a response to edaphic Current extent in the controls although factors including climate and exposure bioregion 38,125ha also have a significant influence. Syncarpia dominated Area protected 29,466ha (77%) vegetation associations are widespread across the bioregion, being found from the wet coastal lowlands to the dry western uplands. Geography Association 60b represents a well developed lowland This is a widespread formation which varies structurally variant, typically found on alluvial flats to the south of across a range of topographic and climatic zones Cardwell with scattered occurrences in the Kuranda area. throughout the bioregion. Well developed tall open forest Observations suggest that Syncarpia glomulifera favours variants are found in dry to wet upland situations from better drained alluvial situations, being displaced by Tinaroo to Rollingstone and in lowland situations on the Eucalyptus pellita in swampier localities. coastal plain between Cardwell and Ingham. Lower stature Association 60c (Syncarpia glomulifera and Melaleuca woodland and open forest associations are widespread quinquenervia) has a restricted distribution and is only being governed to a large extent by soil development, for found in extremely wet, infertile conditions due to a example, associations 60d, 60e and 60f are found on steep combination of groundwater seepage and highly infertile escarpments with minimal soil development.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Description of World Formation Types
    United States Department of Agriculture Classification and Description of World Formation Types Don Faber-Langendoen, Todd Keeler-Wolf, Del Meidinger, Carmen Josse, Alan Weakley, David Tart, Gonzalo Navarro, Bruce Hoagland, Serguei Ponomarenko, Gene Fults, Eileen Helmer Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Service Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-346 August 2016 Faber-Langendoen, D.; Keeler-Wolf, T.; Meidinger, D.; Josse, C.; Weakley, A.; Tart, D.; Navarro, G.; Hoagland, B.; Ponomarenko, S.; Fults, G.; Helmer, E. 2016. Classification and description of world formation types. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-346. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 222 p. Abstract An ecological vegetation classification approach has been developed in which a combi- nation of vegetation attributes (physiognomy, structure, and floristics) and their response to ecological and biogeographic factors are used as the basis for classifying vegetation types. This approach can help support international, national, and subnational classifica- tion efforts. The classification structure was largely developed by the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group (HRWG), which contained members from across the Americas. The HRWG was authorized by the U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) to devel- op a revised global vegetation classification to replace the earlier versions of the structure that guided the U.S. National Vegetation Classification and International Vegetation Classification, which formerly relied on the UNESCO (1973) global classification (see FGDC 1997; Grossman and others 1998). This document summarizes the develop- ment of the upper formation levels. We first describe the history of the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group and discuss the three main parameters that guide the clas- sification—it focuses on vegetated parts of the globe, on existing vegetation, and includes (but distinguishes) both cultural and natural vegetation for which parallel hierarchies are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Shrubland and Managed Buffelgrass Savanna in Drylands
    Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 268 (2019) 269–278 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Agricultural and Forest Meteorology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/agrformet Native shrubland and managed buffelgrass savanna in drylands: Implications for ecosystem carbon and water fluxes T ⁎ César Hinojo-Hinojoa, Alejandro E. Castellanosa, , Travis Huxmanb, Julio C. Rodriguezc, Rodrigo Vargasd, José R. Romo-Leóna, Joel A. Biedermane a Departamento de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Sonora 83000, México b Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Center for Environmental Biology, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA 92629, USA c Departamento de Agricultura y Ganadería, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Sonora 83000, México d Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA e Southwest Watershed Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Land cover and land-use change (LCLUC) between woody- and grass-dominated ecosystems in drylands comprise ff Bu elgrass one of the largest uncertainties in the land CO2 sink. This is especially true for the widespread transition from Cenchrus ciliaris shrublands to grasslands/savannas caused by the establishment of exotic C4 grass species for grazing or through Eddy covariance biological invasion of these species, where information about its impacts on ecosystem CO2 fluxes is limited. For Land cover change studying this, we used three years of eddy covariance measurements of net ecosystem production (NEP), gross Sonoran Desert primary production (GPP), ecosystem respiration (R ) and evapotranspiration (ET) over a Sonoran Desert Carbon and water fluxes eco ff Grass encroachment shrubland and an adjacent grazing savanna of bu elgrass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.), established 35 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Grasslands, Shrublands, and Young Forest Habitats for Wildlife
    Darrel F. Covell UniversityChapter of New Hampshire 1. Introduction Cooperative Extension 131 Main Street, Room 216, Durham, NH 03824; [email protected] When we consider the tremendous diversity of habitats found in the northeastern United States (for the purposes of this publication, the “Northeast” refers to the geographic region that includes the following states: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia), we must ask ourselves, “Why narrowly focus the attention of an entire guide on grassland, shrubland, and young forest habitats?”. The answer lies in the problems of species and habitat declines, which biologists have noted over the last few centuries, especially in recent decades. For instance, 22 of 40 shrubland birds have significant declining population trends in the Northeast; 7 grassland birds are listed as endangered or threatened in at least one state in the region; American woodcock populations have declined by 40% over the past 30 years; New England cottontails occur in only 20% of the area historically occupied; 5 species of butterflies are thought to be extirpated from New England and numerous others associated with shrubland habitats are dramatically declining throughout the region. But are these declines simply natural events or ones that have been influenced by human impact? Just how has our use of the land been a factor in these declines? Let’s explore these questions. “Grasslands” is a broad term that applies to many open land habitats. Typically we think of grassy areas with no shrubs or trees and no agriculture.
    [Show full text]