COELIAC DISEASE a Viral Trigger of Food Insensitivity and Coeliac Disease?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

COELIAC DISEASE a Viral Trigger of Food Insensitivity and Coeliac Disease? RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology | Published online 3 May 2017; doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.60 COELIAC DISEASE A viral trigger of food insensitivity and coeliac disease? A new study published in Science and also perturbs intestinal immune “We provide evidence that provides evidence that reovirus homeostasis, whereas T3D cannot reovirus can trigger loss of oral T1L … infection infection can disrupt intestinal infect the intestine. By engineering a tolerance and invoke inflammatory promoted a immunohomeostasis and instigate a T3D reassortant virus (T3D-RV) that immune responses to gluten,” harmful immune reaction to dietary can infect the gut, the investigators explains author Bana Jabri. “A virus pro‑inflammatory antigens (such as gluten) in mouse established infection models with that is apparently innocuous … can phenotype … models. The findings point to a two reoviruses with potentially alter in the background, in absence of in response possible role for reovirus infection different immunopathological effects. overt disease, the way the intestinal to dietary as a trigger contributing to the Both T1L and T3D-RV infected immune system sees a dietary development of coeliac disease. the intestine, replicated, induced antigen,” she adds. antigens… Previous epidemiological evidence type 1 T helper (TH1) immune “The most significant finding … is has indicated a role for environmental responses in Peyer’s patches and were the elucidation of a mechanism for factors in the pathogenesis of coeliac ultimately cleared without causing how a virus can shape the immune disease, with studies showing an intestinal damage. response to oral antigens to become association with viruses from the T1L, but not T3D-RV, infection harmful,” notes Ludvig Sollid, Reoviridae family and initiation of promoted a pro-inflammatory University of Oslo, who was not disease. However, experimental data phenotype in mesenteric lymph node involved in the research. “It has been supporting this link were lacking. dendritic cells (DCs) in response suspected that environmental factors The researchers first established to dietary antigens (ovalbumin, other than gluten, in particular a viral infection model in mice using a model antigen). Crucially, the infectious agents, can affect the risk genetically engineered Orthoreovirus tolerogenic phenotype was altered: of contracting coeliac disease; this strains (herein, named reovirus), differentiation of CD4+ T cells into paper presents in an elegant way which are double-stranded RNA peripheral regulatory T (Treg) cells a mechanism for how this can be”. viruses. Two human reovirus was blocked and a TH1 immune However, Sollid emphasizes that isolates — type 1 Lang (T1L) and response to dietary antigens was more work is needed to verify type 3 Dearing (T3D) — that differed promoted instead. This process was that the findings observed in mice in terms of replication biology, dependent on interferon regulatory can be translated to a clinical cellular tropism, pathogenesis, innate factor 1 (IRF1). scenario and that reovirus is truly immune response activation and Crucially, T1L infection induced involved in the aetiology of coeliac intestinal effects were examined; the same switch to TH1 immunity disease in humans. T1L is capable of intestinal infection in response to gluten in transgenic The researchers plan further mice expressing HLA-DQ8 (a key work to define the specific host–viral determinant of coeliac disease). interactions required for virus- Transglutaminase 2 activation, which induced loss of oral tolerance. They has been linked to coeliac disease also hope to investigate whether pathogenesis, was also observed after other viruses could have similar T1L infection. Moreover, patients with immunopathological properties. coeliac disease tended to have higher Katrina Ray anti-reovirus antibody titres (P = 0.06) than those without the condition. ORIGINAL ARTICLE Bouziat, R. et al. Reovirus Indeed, a subset of patients with infection triggers inflammatory responses to d dietary antigens. Science 356, 44–50 (2017) L te coeliac disease on a gluten-free diet au i FURTHER READING Verdu, E. F. et al. Novel ra im M s L with high anti-reovirus antibody titres players in coeliac disease pathogenesis: role of the ar er sha lish ll/Macmillan Pub had markedly increased IRF1 levels in gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 12, 497–506 (2015) small intestinal biopsy samples. NATURE REVIEWS | GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY www.nature.com/nrgastro ©2017 Mac millan Publishers Li mited, part of Spri nger Nature. All ri ghts reserved. .
Recommended publications
  • A Preliminary Study of Viral Metagenomics of French Bat Species in Contact with Humans: Identification of New Mammalian Viruses
    A preliminary study of viral metagenomics of French bat species in contact with humans: identification of new mammalian viruses. Laurent Dacheux, Minerva Cervantes-Gonzalez, Ghislaine Guigon, Jean-Michel Thiberge, Mathias Vandenbogaert, Corinne Maufrais, Valérie Caro, Hervé Bourhy To cite this version: Laurent Dacheux, Minerva Cervantes-Gonzalez, Ghislaine Guigon, Jean-Michel Thiberge, Mathias Vandenbogaert, et al.. A preliminary study of viral metagenomics of French bat species in contact with humans: identification of new mammalian viruses.. PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2014, 9 (1), pp.e87194. 10.1371/journal.pone.0087194.s006. pasteur-01430485 HAL Id: pasteur-01430485 https://hal-pasteur.archives-ouvertes.fr/pasteur-01430485 Submitted on 9 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License A Preliminary Study of Viral Metagenomics of French Bat Species in Contact with Humans: Identification of New Mammalian Viruses Laurent Dacheux1*, Minerva Cervantes-Gonzalez1,
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Evolution of Viral Pathogen Community in Cave Nectar Bats (Eonycteris Spelaea)
    viruses Article Diversity and Evolution of Viral Pathogen Community in Cave Nectar Bats (Eonycteris spelaea) Ian H Mendenhall 1,* , Dolyce Low Hong Wen 1,2, Jayanthi Jayakumar 1, Vithiagaran Gunalan 3, Linfa Wang 1 , Sebastian Mauer-Stroh 3,4 , Yvonne C.F. Su 1 and Gavin J.D. Smith 1,5,6 1 Programme in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore; [email protected] (D.L.H.W.); [email protected] (J.J.); [email protected] (L.W.); [email protected] (Y.C.F.S.) [email protected] (G.J.D.S.) 2 NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore 3 Bioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138671, Singapore; [email protected] (V.G.); [email protected] (S.M.-S.) 4 Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117558, Singapore 5 SingHealth Duke-NUS Global Health Institute, SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore 168753, Singapore 6 Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 January 2019; Accepted: 7 March 2019; Published: 12 March 2019 Abstract: Bats are unique mammals, exhibit distinctive life history traits and have unique immunological approaches to suppression of viral diseases upon infection. High-throughput next-generation sequencing has been used in characterizing the virome of different bat species. The cave nectar bat, Eonycteris spelaea, has a broad geographical range across Southeast Asia, India and southern China, however, little is known about their involvement in virus transmission.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Evolution of Emerging Liaoning Virus(Genus Seadornavirus, Family Reoviridae)
    Origin and Evolution of Emerging Liaoning Virusgenus Seadornavirus, family Reoviridae) Jun Zhang Shandong University of Technology Hong Liu ( [email protected] ) Shandong University of Technology https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5182-4750 Jiahui Wang Shandong University of Technology Jiheng Wang Shandong University of Technology Jianming Zhang Shandong University of Technology Jiayue Wang Shandong University of Technology Xin Zhang Shandong University of Technology Hongfang Ji Shandong University of Technology Zhongfen Ding Shandong University of Technology Han Xia Chinese Academy of Sciences Chunyang Zhang Shandong University of Technology Qian Zhao Shandong University of Technology Guodong Liang Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention Research Keywords: Liaoning virus, LNV, Seadornavirus, Evolution, Migration Posted Date: January 15th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.20915/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/13 Abstract Background:Liaoning virus(LNV) is a member of the genus Seadornavirus, family Reoviridae and has been isolated from kinds of sucking insects in Asia and Australia. However, there are no systematic studies describe the molecular genetic evolution and migration of LNVs isolated from different time, regions and vectors. Methods:Here, a phylogenetic analysis using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations was conducted on the LNVs isolated from a variety of vectors during 1990-2014,worldwide. Results:The phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that the LNV could be divided into 3 genotypes, of which genotype 1 mainly composed of LNVs isolated from Australia during 1990 to 2014 as well as the original LNV strain(LNV-NE97-31) isolated from Liaoning province in northern China in 1997,genotype 2 comprised of the isolates all from Xinjiang province in western China and genotype 3 consisted the isolates from Qinghai and Shanxi province of central China.
    [Show full text]
  • Module1: General Concepts
    NPTEL – Biotechnology – General Virology Module1: General Concepts Lecture 1: Virus history The history of virology goes back to the late 19th century, when German anatomist Dr Jacob Henle (discoverer of Henle’s loop) hypothesized the existence of infectious agent that were too small to be observed under light microscope. This idea fails to be accepted by the present scientific community in the absence of any direct evidence. At the same time three landmark discoveries came together that formed the founding stone of what we call today as medical science. The first discovery came from Louis Pasture (1822-1895) who gave the spontaneous generation theory from his famous swan-neck flask experiment. The second discovery came from Robert Koch (1843-1910), a student of Jacob Henle, who showed for first time that the anthrax and tuberculosis is caused by a bacillus, and finally Joseph Lister (1827-1912) gave the concept of sterility during the surgery and isolation of new organism. The history of viruses and the field of virology are broadly divided into three phases, namely discovery, early and modern. The discovery phase (1886-1913) In 1879, Adolf Mayer, a German scientist first observed the dark and light spot on infected leaves of tobacco plant and named it tobacco mosaic disease. Although he failed to describe the disease, he showed the infectious nature of the disease after inoculating the juice extract of diseased plant to a healthy one. The next step was taken by a Russian scientist Dimitri Ivanovsky in 1890, who demonstrated that sap of the leaves infected with tobacco mosaic disease retains its infectious property even after its filtration through a Chamberland filter.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Groups: Viruses (C) 1988, American Biological Safety Association
    Rev.: 1.0 Risk Groups: Viruses (c) 1988, American Biological Safety Association BL RG RG RG RG RG LCDC-96 Belgium-97 ID Name Viral group Comments BMBL-93 CDC NIH rDNA-97 EU-96 Australia-95 HP AP (Canada) Annex VIII Flaviviridae/ Flavivirus (Grp 2 Absettarov, TBE 4 4 4 implied 3 3 4 + B Arbovirus) Acute haemorrhagic taxonomy 2, Enterovirus 3 conjunctivitis virus Picornaviridae 2 + different 70 (AHC) Adenovirus 4 Adenoviridae 2 2 (incl animal) 2 2 + (human,all types) 5 Aino X-Arboviruses 6 Akabane X-Arboviruses 7 Alastrim Poxviridae Restricted 4 4, Foot-and- 8 Aphthovirus Picornaviridae 2 mouth disease + viruses 9 Araguari X-Arboviruses (feces of children 10 Astroviridae Astroviridae 2 2 + + and lambs) Avian leukosis virus 11 Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 1 3 (wild strain) + (ALV) 3, (Rous 12 Avian sarcoma virus Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 1 sarcoma virus, + RSV wild strain) 13 Baculovirus Viral vector/Animal virus 1 + Togaviridae/ Alphavirus (Grp 14 Barmah Forest 2 A Arbovirus) 15 Batama X-Arboviruses 16 Batken X-Arboviruses Togaviridae/ Alphavirus (Grp 17 Bebaru virus 2 2 2 2 + A Arbovirus) 18 Bhanja X-Arboviruses 19 Bimbo X-Arboviruses Blood-borne hepatitis 20 viruses not yet Unclassified viruses 2 implied 2 implied 3 (**)D 3 + identified 21 Bluetongue X-Arboviruses 22 Bobaya X-Arboviruses 23 Bobia X-Arboviruses Bovine 24 immunodeficiency Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 3 (wild strain) + virus (BIV) 3, Bovine Bovine leukemia 25 Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 1 lymphosarcoma + virus (BLV) virus wild strain Bovine papilloma Papovavirus/
    [Show full text]
  • Arenaviridae Astroviridae Filoviridae Flaviviridae Hantaviridae
    Hantaviridae 0.7 Filoviridae 0.6 Picornaviridae 0.3 Wenling red spikefish hantavirus Rhinovirus C Ahab virus * Possum enterovirus * Aronnax virus * * Wenling minipizza batfish hantavirus Wenling filefish filovirus Norway rat hunnivirus * Wenling yellow goosefish hantavirus Starbuck virus * * Porcine teschovirus European mole nova virus Human Marburg marburgvirus Mosavirus Asturias virus * * * Tortoise picornavirus Egyptian fruit bat Marburg marburgvirus Banded bullfrog picornavirus * Spanish mole uluguru virus Human Sudan ebolavirus * Black spectacled toad picornavirus * Kilimanjaro virus * * * Crab-eating macaque reston ebolavirus Equine rhinitis A virus Imjin virus * Foot and mouth disease virus Dode virus * Angolan free-tailed bat bombali ebolavirus * * Human cosavirus E Seoul orthohantavirus Little free-tailed bat bombali ebolavirus * African bat icavirus A Tigray hantavirus Human Zaire ebolavirus * Saffold virus * Human choclo virus *Little collared fruit bat ebolavirus Peleg virus * Eastern red scorpionfish picornavirus * Reed vole hantavirus Human bundibugyo ebolavirus * * Isla vista hantavirus * Seal picornavirus Human Tai forest ebolavirus Chicken orivirus Paramyxoviridae 0.4 * Duck picornavirus Hepadnaviridae 0.4 Bildad virus Ned virus Tiger rockfish hepatitis B virus Western African lungfish picornavirus * Pacific spadenose shark paramyxovirus * European eel hepatitis B virus Bluegill picornavirus Nemo virus * Carp picornavirus * African cichlid hepatitis B virus Triplecross lizardfish paramyxovirus * * Fathead minnow picornavirus
    [Show full text]
  • Upplementary Files
    Supplementary Files Table S1. Accession numbers of viral sequences used in these work for sequence analyses and phylogenetic reconstruction. Name GeneBank Accession Family Drosophila C virus AF014388.1 Dicistroviridae Infectious flacherie virus AB000906.1 Iflaviridae Spodoptera exigua iflavirus-1 JN091707.1 Iflaviridae Spodoptera exigua iflavirus-2 isolate Spain KJ186788 Iflaviridae Lygus lineolaris virus-1 JF720348.1 Iflaviridae Sacbrood virus AF092924.1 Iflaviridae Glossina morsitans virus-like EZ407281.1 Iflaviridae Slow bee paralysis virus EU035616.1 Iflaviridae Brevicoryne brassicae picorna-like virus EF517277.1 Iflaviridae Varroa destructor virus-1 AY251269.2 Iflaviridae Deformed wing virus AJ489744.2 Iflaviridae Kakugo virus AB070959.1 Iflaviridae Perina nuda virus AF323747.1 Iflaviridae Ectropis obliqua picorna-like virus AY365064.1 Iflaviridae Nasonia vitripennis virus-1 FJ790486.1 Iflaviridae Halyomorpha halys virus AGY34702.1 Iflaviridae Laodelphax striatella honeydew virus-1 AHK05791.1 Iflaviridae Nilaparvata lugens honeydew virus-1 BAN19725. Iflaviridae Nilaparvata lugens honeydew virus-2 BAN57352.1 Iflaviridae Nilaparvata lugens honeydew virus-3 BAN57353.1 Iflaviridae Formica exsecta virus-2 AHB62422.1 Iflaviridae Heliconius erato iflavirus AHW98099.1 Iflaviridae Antheraea pernyi iflavirus YP_009002581.1 Iflaviridae Lymantria dispar iflavirus-1 AIF75200.1 Iflaviridae Venturia canescens picorna-like virus AY534885.1 Iflaviridae Antheraea mylitta cypovirus AY212272.1 Reoviridae Antheraea assamensis cypovirus AY212275.1 Reoviridae
    [Show full text]
  • Sustained RNA Virome Diversity in Antarctic Penguins and Their Ticks
    The ISME Journal (2020) 14:1768–1782 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-0643-1 ARTICLE Sustained RNA virome diversity in Antarctic penguins and their ticks 1 2 2 3 2 1 Michelle Wille ● Erin Harvey ● Mang Shi ● Daniel Gonzalez-Acuña ● Edward C. Holmes ● Aeron C. Hurt Received: 11 December 2019 / Revised: 16 March 2020 / Accepted: 20 March 2020 / Published online: 14 April 2020 © The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access Abstract Despite its isolation and extreme climate, Antarctica is home to diverse fauna and associated microorganisms. It has been proposed that the most iconic Antarctic animal, the penguin, experiences low pathogen pressure, accounting for their disease susceptibility in foreign environments. There is, however, a limited understanding of virome diversity in Antarctic species, the extent of in situ virus evolution, or how it relates to that in other geographic regions. To assess whether penguins have limited microbial diversity we determined the RNA viromes of three species of penguins and their ticks sampled on the Antarctic peninsula. Using total RNA sequencing we identified 107 viral species, comprising likely penguin associated viruses (n = 13), penguin diet and microbiome associated viruses (n = 82), and tick viruses (n = 8), two of which may have the potential to infect penguins. Notably, the level of virome diversity revealed in penguins is comparable to that seen in Australian waterbirds, including many of the same viral families. These data run counter to the idea that penguins are subject 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: to lower pathogen pressure. The repeated detection of specific viruses in Antarctic penguins also suggests that rather than being simply spill-over hosts, these animals may act as key virus reservoirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Viral Equine Encephalitis, a Growing Threat
    Viral Equine Encephalitis, a Growing Threat to the Horse Population in Europe? Sylvie Lecollinet, Stéphane Pronost, Muriel Coulpier, Cécile Beck, Gaëlle Gonzalez, Agnès Leblond, Pierre Tritz To cite this version: Sylvie Lecollinet, Stéphane Pronost, Muriel Coulpier, Cécile Beck, Gaëlle Gonzalez, et al.. Viral Equine Encephalitis, a Growing Threat to the Horse Population in Europe?. Viruses, MDPI, 2019, 12 (1), pp.23. 10.3390/v12010023. hal-02425366 HAL Id: hal-02425366 https://hal-normandie-univ.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02425366 Submitted on 23 Apr 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License viruses Review Viral Equine Encephalitis, a Growing Threat to the Horse Population in Europe? Sylvie Lecollinet 1,2,* , Stéphane Pronost 2,3,4, Muriel Coulpier 1,Cécile Beck 1,2 , Gaelle Gonzalez 1, Agnès Leblond 5 and Pierre Tritz 2,6,7 1 UMR (Unité Mixte de Recherche) 1161 Virologie, Anses (the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety), INRAE
    [Show full text]
  • Aquareovirus, Diseases of Wild and Cultured Fishes in Alaska
    VIRUSES Aquareovirus I. Causative Agent and Disease associated with epizootic fish mortal- Aquareovirus is a genus in the virus ity producing severe hemorrhaging in family Reoviridae. These icosahedral fingerlings and yearlings resulting in up (60-80 nm) 11 segmented double- to 80% mortality. stranded RNA viruses (over 50) have been isolated from a variety of marine IV. Transmission and freshwater aquatic animals world- Transmission is horizontal via water wide including finfish, and bivalve mol- or from fish to fish. Isolates from bivalve luscs. Genetic analyses have identified 7 mollusks likely represent virus that has different genotypes or species (A-G) of been shed into the water column from a aquareoviruses. Most of these viruses fish host and then bioaccumulated into produce self-limiting infections of low shellfish tissues by filter feeding. pathogenicity and are not associated with extensive disease or mortality. V. Diagnosis Exceptions include isolates from 7 fish Detection of Aquareovirus is by species that have been associated with isolation of the virus in cultures of fish mortality, most notably the grass susceptible fish cell lines inoculated carp aquareovirus (G). The viral agents with infected tissue. The virus causes a are most often isolated from asymp- unique cytopathic effect (CPE) charac- tomatic adult carrier fish during routine terized by focal areas of cellular fusion screening examinations. (syncytia) and cytoplasmic destruction creating a vacuolated or foamy appear- II. Host Species ance. The exception is grass carp species In the Pacific Northwest states of G that produces a diffuse CPE. Presump- Washington, Oregon and California, tive identifications are made based on adult Chinook salmon appear to be the the typical CPE and are confirmed by most frequent species infected with serology, electron microscopy or poly- aquareovirus A or B.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 - Virology Viruses in Action!!
    Chapter 6 - Virology Viruses in Action!! • Topics – Structure – Classification – Multiplication – Cultivation and replication – Nonviral infectious agent – Teratogenic/Oncogenic - Viruses have a host range. That is, viruses infect specific cells or tissues of specific hosts, or specific bacteria, Human or specific plants. Rhinovirus Common - Viral specificity refers to the specific Cold kinds of cells a virus can infect. It is regulated by the specificities of attachment, penetration and replication of the virus Properties of viruses A virion is an infectious virus particle - not all virus Viruses are not cells, do not have nuclei or particles are infectious mitochondria or ribosomes or other cellular Viruses are composed of a nucleic acid, RNA or DNA components. - never both . Viruses replicate or multiply. Viruses do not grow. All viruses have a protein coat or shell that surrounds Viruses replicate or multiply only within living cells. and protects the nucleic acid core. Viruses are obligate intracellular parasites . Some viruses have a lipid envelope or membrane surrounding a nucleocapsid core. The source of the The term virus was coined by Pasteur, and is from envelope is from the membranes of the host cell. the Latin word for poison. Some viruses package enzymes - e.g. RNA- Components of viruses - dependent-RNA polymerase or other enzymes - some do not package enzymes 1 Size comparison of viruses - how big are they? Structure • Size and morphology • Capsid • Envelope • Complex • Nucleic acid Mycoplasma? There are two major structures
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery and Characterization of Bukakata Orbivirus (Reoviridae:Orbivirus), a Novel Virus from a Ugandan Bat
    viruses Article Discovery and Characterization of Bukakata orbivirus (Reoviridae:Orbivirus), a Novel Virus from a Ugandan Bat Anna C. Fagre 1 , Justin S. Lee 1, Robert M. Kityo 2, Nicholas A. Bergren 1, Eric C. Mossel 3, Teddy Nakayiki 4, Betty Nalikka 2, Luke Nyakarahuka 4,5 , Amy T. Gilbert 6 , Julian Kerbis Peterhans 7, Mary B. Crabtree 3, Jonathan S. Towner 8 , Brian R. Amman 8, Tara K. Sealy 8, Amy J. Schuh 8,9 , Stuart T. Nichol 8, Julius J. Lutwama 4 , Barry R. Miller 3 and Rebekah C. Kading 1,3,* 1 Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA; [email protected] (A.C.F.); [email protected] (J.S.L.); [email protected] (N.A.B.) 2 Department of Zoology, Entomology and Fisheries Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda; [email protected] (R.M.K.); [email protected] (B.N.) 3 Arboviral Diseases Branch, Division of Vector-borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA; [email protected] (E.C.M.); [email protected] (M.B.C.); [email protected] (B.R.M.) 4 Department of Arbovirology, Emerging, and Re-emerging Viral Infections, Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda; [email protected] (T.N.); [email protected] (L.N.); [email protected] (J.J.L.) 5 Department of Biosecurity, Ecosystems and Veterinary Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda 6 National Wildlife Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, Fort Collins,
    [Show full text]