DOCSLIB.ORG

Managing the Retreat from Rising Seas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Managing the Retreat from Rising Seas Managing the Retreat from Rising Seas Staten Island, New York: Oakwood Beach Buyout Committee and Program Matthew D. Viggiano, formerly New York City Cover Photo Credits: Authors Mayor’s Office of Housing Recovery Operations, (top row, left to right): This report was written by Katie Spidalieri, Senior New York; Andrew Meyer, San Diego Audubon, Watershed Protection Department, City of Austin, Associate, and Isabelle Smith, Research Assistant, California; Tim Trautman, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Texas; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Georgetown Climate Center at Georgetown Uni- Storm Water Services, North Carolina; Pam Service; U.S. Fish and versity Law Center; and Jessica Grannis, Coastal Kearfott, City of Austin Watershed Protection Wildlife Service; Integration Resilience Director at National Audubon Society. Department, Texas; James Wade, Harris County and Application Network, University of Maryland The Louisiana Strategic Adaptations for Future Flood Control District, Texas; Fawn McGee, New Center for Environmental Environments (LA SAFE) case study was written by Jersey Department of Environmental Protection; Science. Jennifer Li, Staff Attorney, and Alex Love, student, Frances Ianacone, New Jersey Department of (center row, left to right): Harrison Institute for Public Law at Georgetown Environmental Protection; Thomas Snow, Jr., State of Louisiana Office of University Law Center. Editorial and writing support New York State Department of Environmental Community Development; Integration and Application were provided by Vicki Arroyo, Executive Director, Conservation; Dave Tobias, New York City Network, University of and Lisa Anne Hamilton, Adaptation Program Direc- Department of Environmental Protection, Maryland Center for tor, Georgetown Climate Center. New York; Stacy Curry, Office of Emergency Environmental Science; Will Parson, Chesapeake Management, Woodbridge Township, New Bay Program, U.S. Fish Jersey; Sandy Urgo, The Land Conservancy and Wildlife Service; State Acknowledgments of New Jersey; Joel Gerwein, California State of Louisiana Office of Community Development. Coastal Conservancy; Jay Diener, Seabrook- The authors would like to thank the Doris Duke Hamptons Estuary Alliance, Hampton, New (bottom row, left to right): Charitable Foundation for its generous support and Integration and Application Hampshire; Kirsten Howard, New Hampshire guidance, and without whom the Managed Retreat Network, University of Department of Environmental Services Coastal Toolkit and this case study report would not have Maryland Center for Program; Mathew Sanders, Louisiana Office of Environmental Science; been possible. Betty Whetzel (Courtesy Community Development; Liz Williams Russell, of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Foundation for Louisiana; Joseph (Joe) Tirone, We are also grateful for the support of the Service); Matt Green; Katie Jr., Oakwood Beach Buyout Committee, Staten Spidalieri, Georgetown Georgetown Environment Initiative that enabled Climate Center. Island, New York City, New York; and Megan us to bring together diverse, interdisciplinary Webb, King County Department of Natural stakeholder expertise and Georgetown University Resources and Parks, Washington State. faculty to inform the development of the Managed Retreat Toolkit, including Professors Uwe Brandes, Design: J. Peter Byrne, Beth Ferris, and Sheila Foster. Brent Futrell, Georgetown University Law Center Office of Communications. We would also like to specially thank and acknowledge the following individuals for taking ©2020, Georgetown Climate Center the time to speak with us, review drafts, and provide insights that were invaluable in helping to Georgetown University Law Center inform the Managed Retreat Toolkit and these case 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW studies: Erik Meyers, The Conservation Fund; Matt Washington, D.C. 20001 Whitbeck, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Justine Nihipali, Hawaii Office of Planning Coastal Zone Management Program; Mitchell Austin, City of GeorgetownClimate.org Punta Gorda, Florida; Kelsey Moldenke, Quinault Managed Retreat Toolkit Indian Nation; Charles Warsinske, Quinault Indian Nation; Deborah Helaine Morris, formerly New AdaptationClearinghouse.org York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, New York; Lauren E. Wang, New York City Mayor’s Office of Resiliency, New York; b Table of Contents for the Full Report I. About This Report II. Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge, Maryland: Blackwater 2100 III. State of Hawaii: Assessing the Feasibility and Implications of Managed Retreat Strategies for Vulnerable Coastal Areas in Hawaii I V. Punta Gorda, Florida: Climate Adaptation and Comprehensive Plans and Updates V. Quinault Indian Nation, Washington: Taholah Village Relocation Master Plan VI. Queens, New York: Resilient Edgemere Community Plan VII. San Diego, California: ReWild Mission Bay VIII. Charlotte-Mecklenburg County, North Carolina: Floodplain Buyout Program IX. City of Austin, Texas: Flood Risk Reduction Buyout Projects X. Harris County, Texas: Flood Control District Local Buyout Program XI. New York City, New York: Land Acquisition and Flood Buyout Programs XII. State of New Jersey: Blue Acres Buyout Program XIII. Woodbridge Township, New Jersey: Post-Hurricane Sandy Buyouts XIV. Long Beach, California: Los Cerritos Wetlands Restoration and Land Swap X V. Hampton, New Hampshire: Community-Driven Climate Adaptation Planning Process XVI. State of Louisiana: Louisiana Strategic Adaptations for Future Environments (LA SAFE) XVII. Staten Island, New York: Oakwood Beach Buyout Committee and Program XVIII. King County, Washington: Transfer of Development Rights Program I II Managing the Retreat from Rising Seas: Lessons and Tools from 17 Case Studies About This Report This report is composed of 17 individual case studies. Each one tells a different story about As seas continue to rise and disaster events how states, local governments, and communities and extreme weather increase in frequency and across the country are approaching questions intensity, climate change is driving state and about managed retreat. Together, the case studies local policymakers to evaluate strategies to adapt highlight how different types of legal and policy to various risks affecting many communities. tools are being considered and implemented across In addition to protection (e.g., hard shoreline a range of jurisdictions — from urban, suburban, armoring) and accommodation (e.g., elevating and rural to riverine and coastal — to help support or flood-proofing structures) measures, coastal new and ongoing discussions on the subject. These governments and communities are increasingly case studies are intended to provide transferable evaluating managed retreat, where appropriate, lessons and potential management practices for as a potential component of their comprehensive coastal state and local policymakers evaluating adaptation strategies. Managed retreat is the managed retreat as one part of a strategy to adapt coordinated process of voluntarily and equitably to climate change on the coast. relocating people, structures, and infrastructure Collectively, these case studies present a suite, away from vulnerable coastal areas in response although not an exhaustive list, of legal and policy to episodic or chronic threats to facilitate the tools that can be used to facilitate managed retreat transition of individual people, communities, and efforts. Legal and policy tools featured include: ecosystems (both species and habitats) inland. planning; hazard mitigation buyouts and open The aim of managed retreat is to proactively move space acquisitions, as well as other acquisition tools people, structures, and infrastructure out of harm’s like land swaps and reversionary interests; land use way before disasters occur to maximize benefits and and zoning; and Transfer of Development Rights minimize costs for communities and ecosystems. programs. The case studies also highlight various For example, policymakers may maximize policy tradeoffs and procedural considerations opportunities for flood and risk reduction by necessitated by retreat decisions. Each jurisdiction conserving wetlands and protecting habitat is confronting different challenges and migration corridors and minimize the social, opportunities and has different, perhaps even psychological, and economic costs of relocation by competing, objectives for retreat. In addition, making investments in safer, affordable housing stakeholders in each of these cases are attempting within existing communities. to balance multiple considerations, including: III protecting coastal ecosystems and the environment; government and private sources. fostering community engagement and equity; preparing “receiving communities” or areas where • The Next Steps section captures the anticipated people may voluntarily choose to relocate; and future actions that jurisdictions may take in assessing public and private funding options implementing these managed retreat strategies. and availability. The case studies included in this • The Considerations and Lessons Learned report were selected to reflect the interdisciplinary section concludes with the primary takeaways and complex nature of retreat decisions and from each example that other coastal state underscore the need for comprehensive solutions and local policymakers and communities may and decisionmaking processes to address these consider when developing or implementing challenging considerations. their own managed retreat strategies using these Where possible, all of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Upstate New York Restaurant Owner's Manual, 2Nd Edition
    Upstate New York Restaurant Owner’s Manual An Introduction to Hospitality Industry Labor Laws 2nd Edition,1 April 2019 Cover photographs by Pete Meyers. Left to right, Ashley Cake and Dave Thomas of The Watershed, Adil Gruihi of Casablance Pizzeria, Tammie Olishefski of Ten Forward Cafe, Subworkers, Pam Gueldner and Kathleen Pasetty of Fork & Gavel and Manndible Restaurants [DISCLAIMER] This booklet is distributed with the understanding that neither the Tompkins County Workers’ Center nor the authors of the booklet are rendering legal advice on the subjects discussed here. If you require legal advice, you should seek the services of a competent professional. All regulations are current as of March 2019. ROBERTA REARDON Commissioner As New Yorkers, we are privileged to live in a state brimming with culture. We celebrate our diversity and differences, and restaurants are an example of how we express our love for our culture and share it with others. Through the experience of dining together, we strengthen our bond as a community. Restaurants add vibrant flavor to the places we live, and are often the catalyst that encourages visitors and locals alike to explore and patronize our downtowns. The New York State Department of Labor and the Tompkins County Workers Center deeply value the significant contribution restaurants make to the economic vitality of the region, and consider restaurants esteemed cornerstones of the business community. For generations, families, friends, neighbors and colleagues have gathered at their favorite local restaurants to share meals. These establishments are home to memories made, milestones celebrated and conversations had. They are keepers of countless smiles, laughs and unforgettable moments.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous People of Western New York
    FACT SHEET / FEBRUARY 2018 Indigenous People of Western New York Kristin Szczepaniec Territorial Acknowledgement In keeping with regional protocol, I would like to start by acknowledging the traditional territory of the Haudenosaunee and by honoring the sovereignty of the Six Nations–the Mohawk, Cayuga, Onondaga, Oneida, Seneca and Tuscarora–and their land where we are situated and where the majority of this work took place. In this acknowledgement, we hope to demonstrate respect for the treaties that were made on these territories and remorse for the harms and mistakes of the far and recent past; and we pledge to work toward partnership with a spirit of reconciliation and collaboration. Introduction This fact sheet summarizes some of the available history of Indigenous people of North America date their history on the land as “since Indigenous people in what is time immemorial”; some archeologists say that a 12,000 year-old history on now known as Western New this continent is a close estimate.1 Today, the U.S. federal government York and provides information recognizes over 567 American Indian and Alaskan Native tribes and villages on the contemporary state of with 6.7 million people who identify as American Indian or Alaskan, alone Haudenosaunee communities. or combined.2 Intended to shed light on an often overlooked history, it The land that is now known as New York State has a rich history of First includes demographic, Nations people, many of whom continue to influence and play key roles in economic, and health data on shaping the region. This fact sheet offers information about Native people in Indigenous people in Western Western New York from the far and recent past through 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Staten Island
    Staten Island Waterfront History By Carlotta DeFillo taten Island has 35 miles of waterfront. It is bordered by Newark Bay and the Kill van Kull on the north, Upper New York Bay, the Narrows, S Lower New York Bay and the Atlantic Ocean on the east, Raritan Bay on the south and the Arthur Kill or Staten Island Sound on the west. Several smaller islands sit offshore. Shooters Island near Mariners Harbor was home to Standard Shipbuilding Corp. and Prall’s Island is a bird sanctuary. Off South Beach lie the man-made Hoffman and Swinburne Islands. These two islands were built for use as the quarantine station in 1872, and abandoned in 1933. During World War II they were used for military training, only to be aban- doned again at war’s end. The earliest inhabitants of Staten Island were Algonkian-speaking Native Americans who set up camps along the shores in the areas of Tottenville, Prince’s Bay, Great Kills, Arrochar, Stapleton, West New Brighton, Mariners Harbor and Fresh Kills. They harvested berries, fi sh, oysters and clams, and even ran the Island’s earliest ferries. The fi rst Europeans set foot on Staten Island in Tompkinsville at the Watering Place, a spring of fresh water near the shore, before 1623. The earliest public ferry was in operation in Stapleton by 1708, and by the 1770s ten ferry lines connected Staten Island to New Jersey, Manhattan and Brooklyn. The best-known Island ferryman was Cornelius Vanderbilt, who started an empire from his single sailboat ferry, starting in 1810.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Ground-Water Quality
    NEW YORK GROUND-WATER QUALITY By RJ. Rogers, U.S. Geological Survey and Staff of Division of Water, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 87-0742 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information: For sale by: Chief Hydrologist U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 407 National Center Federal Center Reston, VA 22092 Box 25425 Denver, Colorado 80225 Use of trade names in this report is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey FOREWORD This report contains summary information on ground-water quality in one of the 50 States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or the Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands, Saipan, Guam, and American Samoa. The material is extracted from the manuscript of the 1986 National Water Summary, and with the exception of the illustrations, which will be reproduced in multi-color in the 1986 National Water Summary, the format and content of this report is identical to the State ground-water-quality descriptions to be published in the 1986 National Water Summary. Release of this information before formal publication in the 1986 National Water Summary permits the earliest access by the public. Contents Ground-Water Quality .................................................. 1 Water-Quality in Principal Aquifers ...................................... 1 Background Water Quality ......................................... 1 Effects of Land Use on Water Quality ................................ 2 Solvents and Degreasers ...................................... 2 Gasoline and Petroleum Products .............................. 2 Pesticides .................................................... 3 Nitrate ...................................................... 3 Chloride ..................................................... 3 Other Organic Chemicals and Toxic Metals .....................
    [Show full text]
  • The Finger Lakes Jewels of Central and Western New York
    Fall 2017, Vol. 47, No. 3 ClearWatersNew York Water Environment Association, Inc. The Finger Lakes Jewels of Central and Western New York Also Inside: NYC Watershed Science and Technical Conference Highlights Eliminate this More time for this MONSTER GRINDERS PROTECT YOUR PUMP SO YOU CAN WORK WITHOUT WORRY. Our new line of Muffin Monster® grinders precondition tough debris so your pumps can do what they do best – pump, without clogging. No other solution comes close to eliminating the safety risks, costly downtime and maintenance hassles that wipes cause at the pump station. SEWAGE HAS CHANGED. YOUR COLLECTION SYSTEM SHOULD, TOO. Authorized distributor (800) 986-1994 LEARNwww.JagerInc.com MORE AT JWCE.COM PO Box 50, Boonton, NJ 07005 2 Clear Waters Fall 2017 Jager - LessMore - full-pg-4c.indd 1 12/1/2015 7:40:39 AM ClearWaFallte 2017, Vol.rs 47, No. 3 NYWEA Board of Directors New York Water Environment Association, Inc. Officers President . Paul J . McGarvey, Buffalo President’s Message . 4 President–Elect . Geoffrey Baldwin, New York City Paul McGarvey Vice President . Robert Wither, Albany Vice President–Elect . William J . Nylic III, Woodbury Executive Director’s Message . 5 Treasurer . Thomas J . Lauro, New Rochelle Patricia Cerro-Reehil Assistant Treasurer . Anthony DellaValle, New Rochelle Immediate Past President . Joseph L . Fiegl, Buffalo Highlights of NYC Watershed Science and Technical Conference . 6–7 WEF House of Delegates . John Fortin, New York City Water Views . 9 Chapter Representatives James Tierney Capital . Will Stradling, Troy Central . Brian Skidmore, Syracuse Focus on Safety . 9 Genesee . William Davis, Rochester Eileen Reynolds Long Island . George Desmarais, Melville Lower Hudson .
    [Show full text]
  • To Download Three Wonder Walks
    Three Wonder Walks (After the High Line) Featuring Walking Routes, Collections and Notes by Matthew Jensen Three Wonder Walks (After the High Line) The High Line has proven that you can create a des- tination around the act of walking. The park provides a museum-like setting where plants and flowers are intensely celebrated. Walking on the High Line is part of a memorable adventure for so many visitors to New York City. It is not, however, a place where you can wander: you can go forward and back, enter and exit, sit and stand (off to the side). Almost everything within view is carefully planned and immaculately cultivated. The only exception to that rule is in the Western Rail Yards section, or “W.R.Y.” for short, where two stretch- es of “original” green remain steadfast holdouts. It is here—along rusty tracks running over rotting wooden railroad ties, braced by white marble riprap—where a persistent growth of naturally occurring flora can be found. Wild cherry, various types of apple, tiny junipers, bittersweet, Queen Anne’s lace, goldenrod, mullein, Indian hemp, and dozens of wildflowers, grasses, and mosses have all made a home for them- selves. I believe they have squatters’ rights and should be allowed to stay. Their persistence created a green corridor out of an abandoned railway in the first place. I find the terrain intensely familiar and repre- sentative of the kinds of landscapes that can be found when wandering down footpaths that start where streets and sidewalks end. This guide presents three similarly wild landscapes at the beautiful fringes of New York City: places with big skies, ocean views, abun- dant nature, many footpaths, and colorful histories.
    [Show full text]
  • A Background Study of Historic Land Use of The
    PROPERTY OF LIBRARY IDIVISION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES NARO ccs i4oooO GWaJ13I BACKGROUND STUDY OF HISTORIC LAND USE OF THE GATEWAY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA STATEN ISLAND UNIT Sherene Baugher-Perlin Ph.D Frederick Bluefeld B.A P.B.E.C With special assistance by George Rappaport Ph.D Prepared by the Staten Island Institute of the Arts and Sciences under contract number IFB-NARO-9-0047 for the North Atlantic Regional Office National Park Service U.S Department of the Interior July 1980 Table of Contents Listof Figures ii Acknowledgements Iv Introduction .. Fortwadsworth ....... The Beaches 30 MillerField 49 The Britton Cottage 70 Great Kills Park 86 Recommendations 97 References Cited .1 99 Annotated Bibliography 106 List of Figures No Title Page Map of the Gateway Property on Staten Island map of Old Town Diagram of the excavation area at Oude Dorp 11 Drawing of Fort Richmond under construction 1861 21 Beers map of Fort Wadsworth 1874 22 view bf the Narrows 1854 24 mansion in Arrochar 25 Robinsons map of Fort Wadsworth 1898 27 Military map of Fort Wadsworth 1962 29 10 Historic map of Staten Islands terrain 31 11 Robinsons map of South Beach Resorts 1898 33 12 Pier at Midland Beach 35 13 Hotels at Midland Beach 35 14 Bromleys map of South Beach Resorts 1917 37 15 Robinsons map of Midland Beach Resorts 1898 39 16 Bromleys map of Midland Beach Resorts 1917 43 17 Bromleys map of New Dorp Resorts 1917 44 18 Woodland Beach tent camp 46 19 View of Midland Beach 46 20 Print of the Vanderbilt Home 61 21 Beers map of Vanderbilt Estate 1874 63 List
    [Show full text]
  • Small‐City Dualism in the Metro Hinterland: the Racialized
    Small-City Dualism in the Metro Hinterland: The Racialized “Brooklynization” of New York’s Hudson Valley Leonard Nevarez* Vassar College Joshua Simons SUNY New Paltz How does the metropolis influence population change and amenity development in small cities of the adjacent hinterland? We examine one scenario in five cities of New York state’s Hudson Valley, a region north of metropolitan New York City that reveals dual trajectories of urban change. In some cities, immigrant revitaliza- tion brings population growth, revitalizes main street economies, and extends cities’ majority-minority legacies. In other cities, amenity development attracts metropoli- tan newcomers, triggers residential and retail gentrification, sustains majority-white demographics, and fails to offset out-migration associated with rustbelt decline. These dual trajectories are connected through a metropolitan process of “Brook- lynization”: sociospatial changes in hinterland regions set in motion by racialized amenity pursuits. Culturally, metropolitan outsiders encounter small cities through ‘rural’ frameworks that emphasize outdoor/agricultural amenities, small-town ‘au- thenticity,’ and the implicit whiteness of the hinterland landscape. Economically, immigrant revitalization and amenity development are connected via linked migra- tion that channels an immigrant proletariat to some cities and the amenity migrants they labor for to other cities and towns. How does the metropolis affect population change and amenity development in small cities of the adjacent hinterland? We examine one scenario in five cities of New York state’s Hudson Valley. Located “upstate” or north of New York City (NYC) and bisected by the metropolitan border, this region exhibits contrasting yet interrelated trajecto- ries of urban change: foreign immigrant settlement and amenity development that are materially linked and spatially channeled across different places.
    [Show full text]
  • Epilogue 1941—Present by BARBARA LA ROCCO
    Epilogue 1941—Present By BARBARA LA ROCCO ABOUT A WEEK before A Maritime History of New York was re- leased the United States entered the Second World War. Between Pearl Harbor and VJ-Day, more than three million troops and over 63 million tons of supplies and materials shipped overseas through the Port. The Port of New York, really eleven ports in one, boasted a devel- oped shoreline of over 650 miles comprising the waterfronts of five boroughs of New York City and seven cities on the New Jersey side. The Port included 600 individual ship anchorages, some 1,800 docks, piers, and wharves of every conceivable size which gave access to over a thousand warehouses, and a complex system of car floats, lighters, rail and bridge networks. Over 575 tugboats worked the Port waters. Port operations employed some 25,000 longshoremen and an additional 400,000 other workers.* Ships of every conceivable type were needed for troop transport and supply carriers. On June 6, 1941, the U.S. Coast Guard seized 84 vessels of foreign registry in American ports under the Ship Requisition Act. To meet the demand for ships large numbers of mass-produced freight- ers and transports, called Liberty ships were constructed by a civilian workforce using pre-fabricated parts and the relatively new technique of welding. The Liberty ship, adapted by New York naval architects Gibbs & Cox from an old British tramp ship, was the largest civilian- 262 EPILOGUE 1941 - PRESENT 263 made war ship. The assembly-line production methods were later used to build 400 Victory ships (VC2)—the Liberty ship’s successor.
    [Show full text]
  • Tales from the Littoral Zone the Origin of the Fish Species of Cayuga and Seneca Lakes Mel Russo Finger Lakes Area Naturalist and Life-Long Resident
    CAYUGA LAKE WATERSHED 2015 i2 Network It takes a Network to protect a watershed. News Tales from the Littoral Zone The Origin of the Fish Species of Cayuga and Seneca Lakes Mel Russo Finger Lakes area naturalist and life-long resident Our story begins at an unreasonable point in time, some 550 million years ago when what is now New York State was at the bottom of an epicontinental sea.Gradually, the As the most recent ice age ended, the Burbot (Lota lota) was an early arrival to Seneca and Cayuga lakes. Today this species is listed by NYS entire state, along with much of the northeast, fully DEC as “among the most unusual fish that anglers can encounter.” Please emerged from the sea by about 200 million years ago. see the end of this article for more information. or the next 100 million years or so, the somewhat level land would provide the first vehicle for the re-population of aquatic Fthat was Upstate New York, was then eroded by the flow of fauna into the Finger Lakes. many centuries of torrential precipitation. The wearing away As the front of the ice mass retreated, the young rivers of the land created twelve nearly parallel river valleys, which produced by the melt flowed southward to fill the valleys that included the mighty Seneca and Cayuga Rivers. The easternmost the glacier recently helped to shape. These numerous streams set of six flowed northward into a depression which was encountered other existing freshwater bodies, rivers and the precursor of the Great Lakes Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Communities of New York State
    Ecological Communities of New York State by Carol Reschke New York Natural Heritage Program N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation 700 Troy-Schenectady Road Latham, NY 12110-2400 March 1990 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The New York Natural Heritage Program is supported by funds from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and The Nature Conservancy. Within DEC, funding comes from the Division of Fish and Wildlife and the Division of Lands and Forests. The Heritage Program is partly supported by funds contributed by state taxpayers through the voluntary Return a Gift to Wildlife program. The Heritage Program has received funding for community inventory work from the Adirondack Council, the Hudson River Foundation, the Sussman Foundation, U.S. National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service (Finger Lakes National Forest), and each of the seven New York chapters of The Nature Conservancy (Adirondack Nature Conservancy, Eastern New York Chapter, Central New York Chapter, Long Island Chapter, Lower Hudson Chapter, South Fork/Shelter Island Chapter, and WesternNew YorJ< Chapter) This classification has been developed in part from data collected by numerous field biologists. Some of these contributors have worked under contract to the Natural Heritage Program, including Caryl DeVries, Brian Fitzgerald, Jerry Jenkins, Al Scholz, Edith Schrot, Paul Sherwood, Nancy Slack, Dan Smith, Gordon Tucker, and F. Robert Wesley. Present and former Heritage staff who have contributed a significant portion of field data include Peter Zika, Robert E. Zaremba, Lauren Lyons-Swift, Steven Clemants, and the author. Chris Nadareski helped compile long species lists for many communities by entering data from field survey forms into computer files.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Economic Development in the Finger Lakes Region: the Critical Importance of Tourism and Perceptions of Place
    Sources of Economic Development in the Finger Lakes Region: The Critical Importance of Tourism and Perceptions of Place January 14, 2015 Susan M. Christopherson, Ph.D. 1. Introduction The proposal of Finger Lakes LPG Storage, LLC to build a new liquid petroleum gas (LPG) storage and transportation facility (Project) in the Town of Reading, New York, raises concerns about how increased industrialization of the western shore of Seneca Lake will affect economic development around the lake and in the wider Finger Lakes region.1 In this report, I address that question by exploring the socio-economic context of the Project, with special attention to the branding of the region as a destination for tourism. I draw on 28 years of economic development research and analysis as a Professor of City and Regional Planning at Cornell University.2 My assessment is based on review and analysis of: (1) academic research on the role of branding in tourism, particularly wine tourism; (2) reports on the economic impact of the Finger Lakes wine, vineyard, and tourism industries; (3) Quarterly Census of Employment and Work (QCEW) data for 2000 and 2013, for four counties surrounding Seneca Lake (Ontario, Schuyler, Seneca, and Yates); (4) historical information on the region and counties from The Encyclopedia of New York State;( 5) websites for marketing and economic development organizations for the Finger Lakes region; (6) websites and publications on the wine industry and international wine regions; (7) websites describing academic training and technical assistance to the Finger Lakes wine industry; and (8) interviews with experts on the wine industry in the region, business operators, and economic development officials.
    [Show full text]