6393 Hon. William (Bill) Clay

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

6393 Hon. William (Bill) Clay April 13, 1999 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 6393 must continue to increase funding to reach the ican Legal Process’’ and ‘‘Shades of Free- misconstrued as a respectable replacement 40% of the average pupil expenditure funding dom.’’ for Thurgood Marshall who was a bonafide level mandated in law. Without these federal I first met Judge Higginbotham when he representative of the hopes, dreams and aspi- IDEA funds, local school districts must cover was supporting Senator John F. Kennedy in rations of black Americans. In this under- the unpaid federal share. his campaign for President. In the past twenty taking, Judge Leon Higginbotham wrote to President Clinton proposes to level fund years we developed a closer friendship, ex- Clarence Thomas upon His confirmation to the IDEA for FY2000. Considering that the num- changing telephone calls and letters. I admired Supreme Court. Higginbotham documented ber of children with disabilities is projected to and respected the Judge for his intellectual the legal struggles that had abolished impedi- increase by 123,000 from 1999 to 2000, the prowess and his untiring commitment to civil ments to the freedom of black people and President’s budget request actually cuts fund- rights. enunciated the underlying personal values and ing for children with disabilities from $702 per At the time of his death last December, courage which guided those who led these child in FY1999 to $688 per child in FY2000. Judge Higginbotham was a retired Chief battles. In this letter, Higginbotham challenged Congress must ensure that the Federal gov- Judge Emeritus of the United States Court of Thomas to recall, to understand and to emu- ernment lives up to the promises it made to Appeals, the Public Service Professor of Juris- late the lives of those great gladiators who the students, parents, and schools over two prudence at the John F. Kennedy School of changed the course of history. In this open let- decades ago. We must fully fund IDEA before Government at Harvard, and Counsel to the ter, Higginbotham cited the damage done to Washington creates new education programs. law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & the cause of black America and the crisis in Once the Federal government begins to pay Garrison in New York. During his life, Judge race relations spurred by Judge Thomas’ con- its fair share under IDEA, local funds will be Higginbotham received numerous honors in- firmation. Excerpts from this letter provide the freed up, allowing local schools to hire and cluding the Presidential Medal of Freedom the details of his message: train high-quality teachers, reduce class size, National Human Relations Award of the Na- At first I thought that I should write you build and renovate classrooms, and invest in tional Conference of Christians and Jews, the privately—the way one normally corresponds technology. National Urban Award for outstanding con- with a colleague or friend. I still feel ambiv- alent about making this letter public, but I The resolution I introduce today urges Con- tributions towards the goal of equal oppor- tunity, the 81st NAACP Spingarn Medal for the do so because your appointment is pro- gress to fully fund IDEA while maintaining its foundly important to this country and the commitment to existing federal education pro- highest and noblest achievement by an Afri- can-American, and the 1994 recipient of the world, and because all Americans need to un- grams. We can both ensure that children with derstand the issues you will face on the Su- disabilities receive a free and appropriate pub- Congressional Black Caucus’ Leland Humani- preme Court. In short, Justice Thomas, I lic education and ensure that all children have tarian Award. write this letter as a public record so that In 1996, Higginbotham became an advisor the best education possible if we just provide this generation can understand the chal- to Texaco, Inc. after the company agreed to a fair federal funding for special education. lenges you face as an Associate Justice to $176 million settlement of a race-discrimina- the Supreme Court, and the next generation I urge everyone to support this important tion case. There he initiated a formal evalua- can evaluate the choices you have made or resolution. Congress must fulfill its commit- tion of the company’s human resource policies will make. ment to assist States and localities with edu- and diversity practices in an effort to make By elevating you to the Supreme Court, cating children with disabilities. President Bush has suddenly vested in you Texaco an industry model for its hiring and f the option to preserve or dilute the gains promotion of black employees. In an interview this country has made in the struggle for TRIBUTE TO JUDGE A. LEON that year with the St. Louis Post-Diatch, Judge equality. This is a grave responsibility in- HIGGINBOTHAM Higginbotham was described as seeing ‘‘the deed. And while much has been said future of race relations with an equal mixture about your admirable determination to over- HON. WILLIAM (BILL) CLAY of optimism and pessimism.’’ Leon come terrible obstacles, it is also important Higginbotham knew and understood the ter- to remember how you arrived where you are OF MISSOURI rible history of racial discrimination in the jus- now, because you did not get there by your- IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES self. tice system. He knew that this history could You can become an exemplar of fairness Tuesday, April 13, 1999 never be forgotten if black Americans ever and the rational interpretation of the Con- Mr. CLAY Mr. Speaker, It is my honor to hope to achieve equal justice under law. For stitution, or you can become an archetype of rise in tribute to the late A. Leon this reason, Judge Higginbotham shared my inequality and the retrogressive evaluation Higginbotham, Jr. He was a great American dismay when former President George Bush of human rights. The choice as to whether you will build a decisional record of true and a great friend. Higginbotham was a man presented Clarence Thomas as his choice to replace justice Thurgood Marshall as Asso- greatness or of mere mediocrity is yours. who excelled in many disciplines. He was a Black Ivy League alumni [Higginbotham scholar, a writer, a lawyer, a judge and espe- ciate Supreme Court Justice. On that day, and Thomas finished Yale] in particular cially a humanitarian. independent-minded women were appalled, should never be too impressed by the edu- Leon Higginbotham studied engineering a knowledgeable black Americans were out- cational pedigrees of Supreme Court Jus- Purdue University, continued his education at raged and advocates for the poor abandoned tices. The most wretched decision ever ren- Antioch College and received a LL.B. from their hopes. Then, the disastrous day came dered against black people in the past cen- when the U.S. Senate confirmed Clarence tury was Plessy v. Ferguson. It was written Yale University in 1952. Eighteen years later, in 1896 by Justice Henry Billings Brown who he became the first black elected trustee of Thomas’ appointment and the waves of de- spair washed over millions who had fought, attended both Yale and Harvard law schools. Yale after defeating five other distinguished The opinion was joined by Justice George alumni in a nationwide ballot sacrificed, and suffered to overcome centuries Shiras, a graduate of Yale Law School, as In 1963, President Kennedy nominated A. of discrimination and to achieve respect and well as by Chief Justice Melville Fuller and Leon Higginbotham, Jr. for the U.S District quality. In Black America, six months after Justice Horace Gray, both alumni of Harvard Court of Eastern Pennsylvania. However, Sen- Thomas’ appointment the attitude and senti- Law School. If those four Ivy League alumni on the Su- ator James Eastland of Mississippi blocked his ment toward him as a person was reflected in the words of Judge Higginbotham who wrote: preme Court in 1896 had been as faithful in confirmation by the Senate. After Kennedys their interpretation of the Constitution as Suppose someone wanted to steal back assassination, President Johnson nominated Justice John Harlan, a graduate of Transyl- past achievements, reign in the present gains Higginbotham, and in 1964 appointed him to a vania, a small law school in Kentucky, then and cutoff future expectations among Afri- the venal precedent of Plessy v. Ferguson, seat on the U.S. District Court of Eastern can-Americans about participation in the which established the federal ‘‘separate but Pennsylvania. In 1977, Judge Higginbotham Judicial process. that person would have equal’’ doctrine and legitimized the worst was elevated to the 3rd US Circuit Court of found it difficult to devise a better plan than forms of race discrimination, would not have Appeals. He served as the Chief Judge of the nominating Clarence Thomas to the Su- been the law of our nation for sixty years. preme Court which decreasing the number of Appeals Court from 1990 to 1993. His cele- The separate but equal doctrine; also known African-Americans on the federal bench. brated career was filled with judicial accom- as Jim Crow, created the foundations of sep- plishments. He was the author of more than Mr. Speaker. Judge Higginbotham was de- arate and unequal allocation of resources, 600 published opinions and books, including voted to educating this nation about the perils and oppression of the human rights of ‘‘In the Matter of Race: Race and the Amer- of one black man, Clarence Thomas, being blacks. VerDate jul 14 2003 09:29 Sep 29, 2004 Jkt 069102 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 0689 Sfmt 0634 E:\BR99\E13AP9.000 E13AP9 6394 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS April 13, 1999 The tragedy with Plessy v.
Recommended publications
  • Come Back to the Nickel and Five:* Tracing the Warren Court's Pursuit of Equal Justice Under Law Jim Chen
    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 59 | Issue 4 Article 7 Fall 9-1-2002 Come Back to the Nickel and Five:* Tracing the Warren Court's Pursuit of Equal Justice Under Law Jim Chen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, and the Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Jim Chen, Come Back to the Nickel and Five:* Tracing the Warren Court's Pursuit of Equal Justice Under Law, 59 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1203 (2002), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol59/ iss4/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Come Back to the Nickel and Five:* Tracing the Warren Court's Pursuit of Equal Justice Under Law Jim Chen** Table of Contents I. The Korematsu Conundrum ......................... 1204 II. The Nickel and Five ............................... 1212 A. The "Nickel": Fifth Amendment Due Process and "Reverse Incorporation" ...................... 1215 B. The "Five": Civil Rights Enforcement Under Section Five of the Fourteenth Amendment ........... 1228 C. Main Street U.S.A .............................. 1244 III. The Nixonburger Interregnum ........................ 1248 A. Nixon as Nemesis ........ ................. 1249 B. The Nickel and Five Survives ..................... 1251 C. Affirmative Action as Armageddon ................. 1264 IV. The Grand Rehnquisition ............................ 1280 V. The Fall of the House of Warren ...................... 1294 * It is somewhat deflating to explain the cultural allusion that inspired the title of one's law review article, but editing conventions dictate a word or two of clarification.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventing Democratic Courts: a New and Iconic Supreme Court
    Inventing Democratic Courts: A New and Iconic Supreme Court JUDITH RESNIK AND DENNIS CURTISÃ The Supreme Court’s building was These are the changes that prompted our designed to look old—as if it had been in choice of the phrase “Inventing Democratic place since the country’s founding, rather than Courts” for this essay’s title. We use the word opening in 1935. The work of judges— “democratic” not in the narrow sense of deciding disputes—also appears as if it were a majoritarian political processes; democracy is continuous practice from ancient times. But more than voting. Indeed, unlike some the point of this lecture and of our book, constitutional scholars who identify unelected Representing Justice: Invention, Contro- judges as a problem in need of special versy and Rights in City‐States and explanation in democratic orders, we argue Democratic Courtrooms,1 is to show that that adjudication can itself be a democratic important aspects of adjudication that today practice—that how this Court has come to do seem intrinsic are, like this building, artifacts its work reflects democratic ideals about of the twentieth century. interactions among disputants and between Simply put, in ancient times, judges were government and citizenry. loyal servants of the state; audience members Democratic norms changed adjudication were passive spectators watching rituals by recognizing all persons as juridical actors of power, and only certain persons were who could sue and be sued, and by requiring eligible to participate as disputants, wit- judges to welcome them all as equally entitled nesses, or decision makers. In contrast, to dignified treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Id 174 542 Institution Pub Data Available Ffcm
    DOCUMENT MESONS ID 174 542 SO 011 883 AUTHOR Harrell, Mary Ann Court in TITLE Equal Justice Under Law: The Supreme American Life. INSTITUTION Foundation of the Federal BarAssociation Washington, D.C. PUB DATA 75 NOTE 151p. AVAILABLE FFCM Foundation of the Federal BarAssociation, 1815 H Street, N.W. ,Washington, D.C. 20006 ($2.50) EDFS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC hot Availablefrom EDRS. DESCRIFICPS Constitutional History; *Constitutional Law;Court Doctrine; *Court Role; *Federal Courts;Federal Government; Government Role; Justice;Legal Problems; Secondary Education; *Supreme CourtLitigation; *United States History IDENTIFIERS *Supreme Court; United StatesConstitution ABSTRACT The document descrites theestablishment, development, procedures, and some landmark casescf the U.S. Supreme Court. The objective is to explorethe history cf the court and tc explain its role in the American systemof government. The booklet is presented in fcut chapters. Thefirst chapter, entitled "A Heritage of Law," offers judicialbackground from the 1606 VirginiaCharter tc the Constitution and Bill ofRights. The seccrd chapter, whichforrs the valor part of the document,is entitled "Eecisiors for Liberty." It traces the court's growth of scopethrough precedent-setting decisions sigh as Chisholm v. Georgiain 1793, Marbury v.Madison in 18C3, McCulloch v. Maryland in1819, Gibbors v. Ogden in 1824, Dred Scott v. Sandford in 1857, Munn v.Illinois in 1877, Northern Securities v. United States in 1904,Adkins v. Children's Hospital in 1923, Brown v. Board of Educationin 1951, Gidecn v. Wainwright in 1963, and Roe v. Wade in 1973.Chief Justices and events are described historically in connectionwits the cases, from John Jay to Warren Burger, as the court's power asinterpreter of the Constitution grew.
    [Show full text]
  • Written by George Stevens, Jr. Directed by Lou Bellamy PLAY
    Written by George Stevens, Jr. Directed by Lou Bellamy P.L.A.Y. (Performance = Literature + Art + You) Student Matinee Series 2018-19 Season Discovery Guide 1 Dear Educators: “A lawyer’ s either a social engineer or a parasite on society. A social engineer is a highly skilled, perceptive, sensitive lawyer who understands the Constitution of the United States and knows how to explore its uses in the solving of problems of local communities and in bettering conditions of the underprivileged citizens.” – Howard University Dean Charles Hamilton Houston At the Meet & Greet for Thurgood (where a show’s cast, director, and creative team meet the staff of the theatre) back in September, Director Lou Bellamy commented, “It’s kismet that this play becomes more timely and of a particular focus as it gets closer.” When Geva was planning our 2018-2019 season, we felt compelled to share the life and legacy of Thurgood Marshall for a number of reasons (some of them are shared by our season planning committee on page 4), but we weren’t yet aware of Justice Anthony Kennedy’s upcoming retirement announcement or the impending nomination and tumultuous appointment of a new Supreme Court Justice to fill the vacancy. “Marshall demonstrated those qualities which we admire in members of our highest judicial tribunal: thoughtfulness, care, moderation, reasonableness, a judicial temperament, and a balanced approach to controversial and complicated national problems. Thurgood Marshall’s rise to the Supreme Court reaffirms the American ideal that what counts is
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions Of
    E630 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð Extensions of Remarks April 13, 1999 of optimism and pessimism.'' Leon You can become an exemplar of fairness because of Brown v. Board of Education and Higginbotham knew and understood the ter- and the rational interpretation of the Con- who stood in the way of almost every meas- rible history of racial discrimination in the jus- stitution, or you can become an archetype of ure ensure gender and racial advancement. inequality and the retrogressive evaluation Of the fifty-two Senators who vote in favor tice system. He knew that this history could of human rights. The choice as to whether of your confirmation some thirteen hailed never be forgotten if black Americans ever you will build a decisional record of true from nine Southern states. Some may have hope to achieve equal justice under law. For greatness or of mere mediocrity is yours. voted for you because they agreed with this reason, Judge Higginbotham shared my Black Ivy League alumni [Higginbotham President Bush's assessment that you were dismay when former President George Bush and Thomas finished Yale] in particular ``the best person for the position.'' But, can- presented Clarence Thomas as his choice to should never be too impressed by the edu- didly, Justice Thomas, I do not believe that replace justice Thurgood Marshall as Asso- cational pedigrees of Supreme Court Jus- you were indeed the most competent person ciate Supreme Court Justice. On that day, tices. The most wretched decision ever ren- to be on the Supreme Court. Charles Bowser, dered against black people in the past cen- a distinguished African-American Philadel- independent-minded women were appalled, tury was Plessy v.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    Nos. 18-1334, -1475, -1496, -1514, -1521 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, Petitioner, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, et al., Respondents. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, et al., Petitioners, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al., Respondents. (For Continuation of Caption See Inside Cover) ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CouRT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRcuIT BRIEF FOR AMICUS CURIAE EQUALLY AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY STEVEN S. ROSENTHAL Counsel of Record NEIL C. WEARE LOEB & LOEB LLP 901 New York Avenue NW, Suite 300 East Washington, DC 20001 (202) 618-5000 [email protected] Counsel for Amicus Curiae 290768 OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF ALL TITLE III DEBTORS OTHER THAN COFINA, Petitioner, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, et al., Respondents. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, et al., Respondents. UNIÓN DE TRABAJADORES DE LA INDUSTRIA ELÉCTRICA Y RIEGO, INC., Petitioner, v. FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, et al., Respondents. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTEREST OF THE AMICUS CURIAE ................ 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................. 3 ARGUMENT ............................................................ 7 I. The Insular Cases and Their Doctrine of Territorial Incorporation Should Be Overruled ....................................................... 7 II. Short of Overruling the Insular Cases, the Court Should Clarify The Narrow Scope of Their Application Today ............... 10 A. The Insular Cases Were Grounded In A Transitory Historical Context ............................. 11 B. The Insular Cases Did Not Limit Constitutional Protections To A Narrow Category Of Fundamental Rights ................................................ 13 C. More Recent Supreme Court Decisions Cabin the Insular Cases To Their Facts .......................
    [Show full text]