DOCSLIB.ORG

Genome Complexity’ Conundrum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Genome Complexity’ Conundrum Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 27, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW Eukaryotic regulatory RNAs: an answer to the ‘genome complexity’ conundrum Kannanganattu V. Prasanth and David L. Spector1 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA A large portion of the eukaryotic genome is transcribed Caenorhabditis elegans is extremely close (http://www. as noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). While once thought of ensembl.org). Such analyses suggest that protein-coding primarily as “junk,” recent studies indicate that a large genes alone are not sufficient to account for the com- number of these RNAs play central roles in regulating plexity of higher eukaryotic organisms. Interestingly, gene expression at multiple levels. The increasing diver- from genomic analysis it is evident that as an organism’s sity of ncRNAs identified in the eukaryotic genome sug- complexity increases, the protein-coding contribution of gests a critical nexus between the regulatory potential of its genome decreases (Mattick 2004a,b; Szymanski and ncRNAs and the complexity of genome organization. We Barciszewski 2006). A portion of this paradox can be re- provide an overview of recent advances in the identifi- solved through alternative pre-mRNA splicing, whereby cation and function of eukaryotic ncRNAs and the roles diverse mRNA species, encoding different protein iso- played by these RNAs in chromatin organization, gene forms, can be derived from a single gene (Lareau et al. expression, and disease etiology. 2004). In addition, a range of post-translational modifi- cations contributes to the increased complexity and di- versity of protein species (Yang 2005). Although Jacob and Monod (1961) suggested early on It is estimated that ∼98% of the transcriptional output that structural genes encode proteins and regulatory of the human genome represents RNA that does not en- genes produce noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), the prevail- code protein (Mattick 2005). This suggests that these ge- ing view has been that proteins not only constitute the nomes are either replete with largely useless transcrip- primary structural and functional components of cells, tion or that these ncRNAs are fulfilling a wide range of but also constitute most of the regulatory control system unexpected functions in eukaryotic biology (Hutten- in both simple and complex organisms. However, recent hofer et al. 2005; Mattick 2005). Recent observations advances in the fields of RNA biology and genome re- strongly suggest that ncRNAs contribute to the complex search have reassessed this “age-old” assumption and networks needed to regulate cell function and could be provided significant evidence of the importance of RNAs the ultimate answer to the genome paradox (Mattick as “riboregulators” outside of their more conventional 2001, 2003, 2004a,c; Mattick and Gagen 2001). Initially role as accessory molecules. the term ncRNA was used primarily to describe eukary- Recent large-scale studies of the human and mouse otic RNAs that are transcribed by RNA polymerase II genomes have revealed that although there are ∼21,561 (RNA pol II) and have a 7-methylguanosine cap structure protein-coding genes in human and 21,839 in mouse, sig- at their 5Ј end and a poly(A) tail at their 3Ј end, but lack nificantly larger portions of both genomes are tran- a single long ORF. However, more recently this classifi- scribed (69,185 gene predictions in human and 71,259 in cation has been extended to all RNA transcripts that do mouse) (http://www.ensembl.org). Based on such analy- not have a protein-coding capacity. NcRNAs include in- ses, eukaryotic genomes appear to harbor fewer protein- trons and independently transcribed RNAs, with the lat- coding genes than initially expected, and gene number ter accounting for 50%–75% of all transcription in does not scale with complexity as steeply as originally higher eukaryotes (Mattick and Gagen 2001; Shabalina anticipated (Mattick 2004a; Mattick and Makunin 2006). and Spiridonov 2004). Introns account for at least 30% of For example, the Drosophila melanogaster genome con- the human genome, but they have been largely over- tains only twice as many genes as some bacterial species, looked due to the general assumption that they are rap- although the former is far more complex in its genome idly degraded upon pre-mRNA splicing (Mattick 1994, organization than the latter. Similarly, the number of 2005). In mammalian genomes, introns comprise ∼95% protein-coding genes in human and in the nematode of the sequence within protein-coding genes. Introns have been suggested to play important roles in nucleo- [Keywords: RNA; disease; intergenic transcripts; noncoding RNA; some formation and chromatin organization, alternative nuclear regulatory RNAs] pre-mRNA splicing, and as scaffold/matrix-attachment 1Corresponding author. E-MAIL [email protected]; FAX (516) 367-8876. regions (Shabalina and Spiridonov 2004). Intronic se- Article is online at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.1484207. quences have also been shown to harbor independent GENES & DEVELOPMENT 21:11–42 © 2007 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press ISSN 0890-9369/07; www.genesdev.org 11 Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 27, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Prasanth and Spector transcription units, such as microRNAs, small nucleolar chromosome genes must therefore be equalized in the RNAs (snoRNAs), and repetitive elements (Mattick and two sexes, a process referred to as dosage compensation. Makunin 2005). This can be achieved either by X-chromosome inactiva- It is not clear how many ncRNA genes are present in tion (XCI) in XX cells or by hyperactivation of the single the mammalian genome. The existing catalog of mam- X chromosome in XY cells. Both of these mechanisms malian genes is strongly biased toward protein-coding are used by different species and both depend on the genes. Novel ncRNA genes are difficult to identify based expression of regulatory ncRNAs that are key elements on sequence analysis due to their sequence divergence of the pathways leading to chromatin remodeling (Luc- across phyla (Pang et al. 2006). The nature of ncRNA chesi et al. 2005). genes, including their variation in length (20 nucleotides [nt] to >100 kb), lack of ORFs, and relative immunity to XCI point mutations makes them difficult targets for genetic screens. Analysis of mouse full-length cDNAs revealed In mammals, dosage compensation of X-linked gene that ncRNAs constitute more than one-third of all iden- products between the sexes is achieved by transcrip- tified transcripts (Okazaki et al. 2002; Numata et al. tional silencing of a single X chromosome during early 2003; Carninci et al. 2005). Whole human chromosome female embryogenesis (Lyon 1961; Plath et al. 2002; analysis using oligonucleotide tiling arrays has demon- Heard and Disteche 2006; Spencer and Lee 2006). Initia- strated a significantly large number of genes encoding tion of XCI requires the counting of X chromosomes. ncRNAs on most of the analyzed chromosomes XCI follows the “n − 1” rule that leads to transcriptional (Kapranov et al. 2002; Cawley et al. 2004; Kampa et al. silencing of all but one X chromosome. In female soma, 2004; Cheng et al. 2005), many of which show extraor- XCI occurs in early development shortly after uterine dinarily complex patterns of interlaced and overlapping implantation of the embryo. This form of XCI is called transcription (Carninci et al. 2005; Kapranov et al. 2005). “random” because silencing can take place on either X Current estimates of the number of independent tran- chromosome (Spencer and Lee 2006). However, in the scription units (∼70,000) and protein-coding genes extraembryonic tissues of some placental mammals, (∼21,500) in the mammalian transcriptome suggest that such as rodents, XCI takes place in an “imprinted” man- ncRNA genes are highly abundant in the genome ner such that the paternal X (Xp) is always silenced (Mattick 2004b,c, 2005; Mattick and Makunin 2006; (Takagi and Sasaki 1975). Earlier classical cytogenetics Willingham and Gingeras 2006). studies suggested that the paternal X only becomes in- Based on functional relevance, ncRNAs can be subdi- activated at the blastocyst stage, accompanying cellular vided into two classes: (1) housekeeping ncRNAs and (2) differentiation in the trophoectoderm and primitive en- regulatory ncRNAs. Housekeeping ncRNAs are gener- doderm (Takagi et al. 1982). However, recent studies ally constitutively expressed and are required for the nor- have revealed that the paternal X has already begun to mal function and viability of the cell. Some examples inactivate by the eight-cell stage (Huynh and Lee 2003; include transfer RNAs (tRNAs), ribosomal RNAs Mak et al. 2004; Okamoto et al. 2004; Okamoto and (rRNAs), small nuclear (snRNAs), snoRNAs, RNase P Heard 2006) and this inactivation of Xp initiates follow- RNAs, telomerase RNA, etc. These RNAs have been the ing Xist RNA coating at the four-cell stage (Okamoto et focus of many reviews (Eddy 2001; Gesteland et al. 2006) al. 2004, 2005). Imprinted XCI is also observed in mar- and will not be considered further here. In contrast, regu- supials and is believed to be the earliest form of XCI latory ncRNAs or riboregulators include those ncRNAs (Graves 1996). This inactive state is stably maintained that are expressed at certain stages of development, through subsequent cell divisions. The X inactivation during cell differentiation, or as a response to external center (Xic) is a critical region of 80–450 kb on the X stimuli, which can affect the expression of other genes at chromosome that controls XCI initiation and spreading the level of transcription or translation. Several recent (Heard and Disteche 2006; Spencer and Lee 2006). Only excellent reviews have focused on small regulatory the chromosomes carrying the Xic sequence are able to RNAs, including small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and induce XCI, even though the “random” and “imprinted” microRNAs (Hannon 2002; He and Hannon 2004; Mattick forms of XCI may differ with respect to the requirement and Makunin 2005; Zamore and Haley 2005; Petersen et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Hallmarks of Cancer a Long Non-Coding RNA Point of View
    review REVIEW RNA Biology 9:6, 703-719; June 2012; © 2012 Landes Bioscience The hallmarks of cancer A long non-coding RNA point of view Tony Gutschner and Sven Diederichs* Helmholtz-University-Group “Molecular RNA Biology & Cancer”; German Cancer Research Center DKFZ; Heidelberg, Germany; Institute of Pathology; University of Heidelberg; Heidelberg, Germany Keywords: non-coding RNA, ncRNA, lincRNA, gene expression, carcinogenesis, tumor biology, cancer therapy, MALAT1, HOTAIR, XIST, T-UCR Abbreviations: ALT, alternative lengthening of telomeres; AR, androgen receptor; ANRIL, antisense non-coding RNA in the INK4 locus; Bax, BCL2-associated X protein; Bcl-2, B cell CLL/lymphoma 2; Bcl-xL, B cell lymphoma-extra large; CBX, chromobox homolog; cIAP2, cellular inhibitor of apoptosis; CUDR, cancer upregulated drug resistant; EMT, epithelial- mesenchymal-transition; eNOS, endothelial nitric-oxide synthase; ER, estrogen receptor; GAGE6, G antigene 6; GAS5, growth-arrest specific 5; GR, glucocorticoid receptor; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor; HMGA1, high mobility group AT-hook 1; hnRNP, heterogenous ribonucleoprotein; HOTAIR, HOX antisense intergenic RNA; HOX, homeobox; HULC, highly upregulated in liver cancer; lncRNA, long non-coding RNA; lincRNA, long intergenic RNA; MALAT1, metastasis associated long adenocarcinoma transcript 1; Mdm2, murine double minute 2; miRNA, microRNA; mRNA, messenger RNA; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; Myc, myelocytomatosis oncogene; NAT, natural antisense transcript; ncRNA, non-coding
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2006 Volume Nine / Number One
    SPRING 2006 VOLUME NINE / NUMBER ONE NON-PROFIT U.S. POSTAGE PAID PERMIT 751 SAN DIEGO, CA THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE A PUBLICATION OF THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE Office of Communications—TPC30 ENDEAVOR 10550 North Torrey Pines Road La Jolla, California 92037 www.scripps.edu PUBLISHER: Keith McKeown EDITOR: Mika Ono Benedyk DESIGN: Miriello Grafico PRODUCTION: Miriello Grafico Kevin Fung COVER ILLUSTRATION: Dennis Clouse PORTRAIT PHOTOGRAPHY: Martin Trailer Bruce Hibbs Jamey Stillings PRINTING: Precision Litho © 2006 All material copyrighted by The Scripps Research Institute. “While the last century has been the century of physical sciences, I believe the next century will be the century of biological sciences.” ANDREW VITERBI, PH.D. Scripps Research Supporter THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE Andrew J. Viterbi Looks to the Future ENDEAVOR Inventor, entrepreneur, and Scripps Research trustee Andrew J. Viterbi, Ph.D., has spent half a century capturing and capitalizing on the physical sciences. Best known for the Viterbi Algorithm used in digital communications and other fields and a co-founder VOLUME NINE / NUMBER ONE SPRING 2006 of QUALCOMM, Inc., a leading developer and manufacturer of mobile satellite com- munications and digital wireless telephony, Viterbi nonetheless sees biological sciences as the wave of the future. “While the last century has been the century of physical sciences, I believe the next century will be the century of biological sciences,” says Viterbi. 1723 Viterbi’s interest in the biological sciences first led him to Scripps Research as a member of the Scripps Cancer Center Advisory Board. The center is dedicated to FEATURES: ALSO: quickly bringing advanced cancer treatments from the laboratory bench to the patient’s bedside through breakthrough translational research.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogenesis and Transcriptional Regulation of Long Noncoding Rnas in the Human Immune System Charles F
    Th eJournal of Brief Reviews Immunology Biogenesis and Transcriptional Regulation of Long Noncoding RNAs in the Human Immune System Charles F. Spurlock, III,* Philip S. Crooke, III,† and Thomas M. Aune* The central dogma of molecular biology states that DNA members of the same clade (4–7). Although some lncRNAs makes RNA makes protein. Discoveries over the last have orthologous transcripts across species leading to robust quarter of a century found that the process of DNA tran- experimental systems, this is not always the case, leaving many scription into RNA gives rise to a diverse array of func- lncRNAs explored in animal models unverified in human tional RNA species, including genes that code for protein systems. In this article, we explore the features that give rise to and noncoding RNAs. For decades, the focus has been these transcripts and highlight recent work identifying specific on understanding how protein-coding genes are regu- genomic loci that transcribe lncRNAs found in the human lated to influence protein expression. However, with immune system. the completion of the Human Genome Project and follow-up ENCODE data, it is now appreciated that lncRNA nomenclature and canonical transcription and function only 2–3% of the genome codes for protein-coding The discovery of lncRNAs would not have been possible gene exons and that the bulk of the transcribed ge- without the completion of the Human Genome Project that nome, apart from ribosomal RNAs, is at the level of provided the first drafts of a complete reference sequence and noncoding RNA genes. In this article, we focus on the refinement of DNA- and RNA-sequencing platforms capable biogenesis and regulation of a distinct class of non- of longer sequence reads and higher read depth and coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Overview of Lncrnas in Endothelial Dysfunction-Associated Diseases: from Discovery to Characterization
    epigenomes Review A Brief Overview of lncRNAs in Endothelial Dysfunction-Associated Diseases: From Discovery to Characterization Rashidul Islam 1 and Christopher Lai 2,* 1 Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China; [email protected] 2 Health and Social Sciences Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore 138683, Singapore * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +65-6592-1045 Received: 12 August 2019; Accepted: 7 September 2019; Published: 13 September 2019 Abstract: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a novel class of regulatory RNA molecules and they are involved in many biological processes and disease developments. Several unique features of lncRNAs have been identified, such as tissue-and/or cell-specific expression pattern, which suggest that they could be potential candidates for therapeutic and diagnostic applications. More recently, the scope of lncRNA studies has been extended to endothelial biology research. Many of lncRNAs were found to be critically involved in the regulation of endothelial function and its associated disease progression. An improved understanding of endothelial biology can thus facilitate the discovery of novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for endothelial dysfunction-associated diseases, such as abnormal angiogenesis, hypertension, diabetes, and atherosclerosis. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanism of lncRNA remains undefined in previous published studies. Therefore, in this review, we aimed to discuss the current methodologies for discovering and investigating the functions of lncRNAs and, in particular, to address the functions of selected lncRNAs in endothelial dysfunction-associated diseases. Keywords: endothelial dysfunction; lncRNAs; angiogenesis; hypertension; atherosclerosis; diabetes 1. Introduction The endothelium, which is also known as the “tissue-blood barrier”, is a monolayer of endothelial cells (ECs) that lines on the outer surface of blood vessels.
    [Show full text]