DOCSLIB.ORG

The Environmental Impact of Dairy Production in the Eu

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Environmental Impact of Dairy Production in the Eu 'LVFODLPHU 7KHYLHZVVHWRXWDQGDQDO\VLVSUHVHQWHGDUHWKRVHRIWKHDXWKRUVDQGGRQRWQHFHVVDULO\UHSUHVHQWWKH YLHZVRIWKH&RPPLVVLRQLQJHQHUDORURIWKH(19,5210(17'* Final report for European Commission (DGXI ) Submitted by CEAS Consultants (Wye) Ltd Centre for European Agricultural Studies and The European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pastoralism Telephone: 01233 812181 Fax: 01233 813309 THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF DAIRY PRODUCTION IN THE EU E-mail: [email protected] CEAS 1779/BDB April 2000 THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF DAIRY PRODUCTION IN THE EU: PRACTICAL OPTIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINAL REPORT 2 THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF DAIRY PRODUCTION IN THE EU Contents S1. Executive summary............................................................................................................................ iii 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Methodology................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3. Report structure ............................................................................................................................ 2 PART 1: DAIRY SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT....................... 3 2. A review of dairy production in Europe ............................................................................................... 3 2.1. Production base data ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.2. Main production regions ............................................................................................................... 9 2.3. Economic and technical classification of dairy farming................................................................... 9 2.3.1. High input/output systems ...................................................................................................10 2.3.2. Low input/output systems ....................................................................................................11 2.3.3. Mountain systems.................................................................................................................12 2.3.4. Mediterranean systems.........................................................................................................13 2.3.5. Organic systems ...................................................................................................................14 2.4. Overview and trends ...................................................................................................................15 3. Description of dairying in the bio-geographical regions.......................................................................17 3.1. Atlantic region.............................................................................................................................18 3.2. Continental region.......................................................................................................................23 3.3. Mediterranean region ..................................................................................................................26 3.4. Boreal region ...............................................................................................................................30 3.5. Alpine region...............................................................................................................................32 3.6. Macronesian region .....................................................................................................................35 4. Classification of dairy farming for environmental purposes.................................................................39 4.1. The environmental perspective ....................................................................................................39 4.2. Land use categories (fodder and forage resources) ......................................................................39 4.3. A Typology of EU Dairy Systems................................................................................................42 4.4. Dairy system profiles ...................................................................................................................47 5. Main trends and environmental issues in EU dairy systems.................................................................55 5.1. The European perspective ...........................................................................................................55 5.2. Approach to the assessment ........................................................................................................55 5.3. Environmental issues and EU dairy systems .................................................................................56 5.3.1. Overview..............................................................................................................................56 5.3.2. Landscape and habitats.........................................................................................................56 5.3.3. Biodiversity...........................................................................................................................57 5.3.4. Soil.......................................................................................................................................59 5.3.5. Water ...................................................................................................................................60 5.3.6. Air........................................................................................................................................61 5.3.7. Greenhouse gases.................................................................................................................61 5.3.8. Energy consumption use of non renewable resources ...........................................................62 5.4. Trends and issues in each system .................................................................................................64 6. Agenda 2000 and the dairy sector: comments and analysis...............................................................73 6.1. Summary of reforms....................................................................................................................73 i THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF DAIRY PRODUCTION IN THE EU 6.2. General implications of reforms...................................................................................................75 6.3. Implications by farm types ..........................................................................................................77 6.4. Scope for affecting the environmental impact of dairy farming....................................................78 6.5. The potential use of the typology of EU Dairy Systems...............................................................79 PART 2: PRACTICAL OPTIONS FOR IMPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF EU DAIRY SYSTEMS..................................................................................................................................81 7. Existing measures for improving the environmental impact of EU dairy systems.................................83 7.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................83 7.2. Overview of present measures to minimise the environmental impact .........................................83 7.3. Overview of present environmental enhancement measures (Regulation 2078/92 measures) ....94 7.3.1. Overview of measures..........................................................................................................94 7.3.2. Grassland management measures .........................................................................................98 7.3.3. Rare breeds measures........................................................................................................ 101 7.4. Existing enhancement measures and environmental impact: conclusions................................... 107 8. Potential new options for improving the environmental impact of EU dairy systems ....................... 111 8.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 111 8.2. Practical options for delivering good agricultural (and environmental) practice: cross compliance across dairy production systems ....................................................................................................... 114 8.3. Practical options for delivering good agricultural (and environmental) practice: cross compliance for specific dairy production systems................................................................................................ 121 8.3.1. P1 Transhumant dairy systems .......................................................................................... 122 8.3.2. Intensive grassland (ley) systems: G1................................................................................. 123 8.3.3. Permanent grassland (lowland) systems: G2 ...................................................................... 124 8.3.4. Permanent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is DAIRY? COW’S HEALTHY DIET Dairy Cows Are Fascinating Animals
    Dairy What is DAIRY? COW’S HEALTHY DIET Dairy cows are fascinating animals. teeth. Calcium also helps our muscles meal and vitamins/minerals. Dairy cows They turn grass and grains into milk. and nerves work properly, and helps also drink 30-50 gallons of water each Heifers are female dairy cattle that have blood clot. Milk products also provide day. That is about an entire bathtub Vitamins/Minerals not given birth to a calf. Once a heifer us with carbohydrates, protein and full of water. With all that eating and 2 pounds gives birth, it is called a cow. All female Vitamin D. You should have 3 servings drinking, are cows stuffed? The simple dairy cows must have a calf to produce of nonfat or low-fat milk and milk answer is ‘no’. They are eating to meet Ground Corn Soybean Meal milk. The gestation (pregnancy) period products each day. One serving of their energy (calorie) needs—they 8 pounds 5 pounds for cows is nine months. Newborn dairy is equal to 1 cup of milk, yogurt do not overeat. Young animals that calves weigh about 80-100 pounds. or ice cream and 1 ½ -2 ounces of are actively growing have greater Hay Male dairy cattle are called bulls and do cheese. requirements for protein than older 20 pounds not produce milk. animals. Corn Silage A 1,500 pound dairy cow eats 100 65 pounds Milk provides your body with calcium, pounds of feed each day. This includes which is needed for healthy bones and corn silage, hay, ground corn, soybean Total: 100 pound per day DID YOU KNOW? National Milk Day Each year, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability and Dairy Farming Fact Sheet
    SUSTAINABILITY AND DAIRY FARMING FACT SHEET Striving to protect the natural resources (such as soil, water, and air) needed for current and future food production is not a new endeavor, although the present-day pressures on all of Earth’s resources have generated widespread interest in this important effort. The core aspects of sustainability have always been an integral part of dairy farmers’ personal values and daily on-farm practices. Understanding Sustainability What is sustainability? While there was some degree of discussion of sustainability in the 1970s, it wasn’t until the 1980s that a specific characterization for sustainability in agriculture was developed.1 The U.S. Government, in the 1990 Farm Bill, defined it as follows—a definition that was adopted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture2 (USDA) and many others: Sustainable Agriculture is an integrated system of plant and animal production practices having a site-specific application that over the long term will: • Satisfy human food and fiber needs; • Enhance environmental quality and the natural resource base upon which the agricultural economy depends; • Make the most efficient use of nonrenewable resources and on-farm resources and integrate, where appropriate, natural biological cycles and controls; • Sustain the economic viability of farm operations; and • Enhance the quality of life for farmers and society as a whole. Sustainable farms must meet all five elements of the USDA definition. For instance, a farm that stresses environmental quality while not being economically viable is not sustainable. Likewise, one that focuses on short-term profits without making the most efficient use of nonrenewable resources would not fit the definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Dairy Sheep a Publication of ATTRA - National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service • 1-800-346-9140 •
    ATTRA Dairy Sheep A Publication of ATTRA - National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service • 1-800-346-9140 • www.attra.ncat.org By Margo Hale and The sale of sheep milk or milk products is often more profitable than selling only lamb or wool. This Linda Coffey publication explores the dairy sheep business and helps producers decide whether it is a viable option NCAT Agriculture for their farms. Regulations governing the industry are discussed. Also addressed are production issues, Specialists animal health, stock selection, and nutrition issues surrounding dairy sheep. References and resources ©2006 NCAT follow the narrative. Contents Introduction ..................... 1 Getting Help .................... 2 Getting Started ............... 2 Labor ..............................2 Marketing ..................... 3 Processing ....................3 Regulations ..................4 Budgeting .................... 5 Production Notes ........... 6 Selecting Stock ...........6 Lacaune dairy sheep. Photo by Yves Berger, courtesy of University of Wisconsin Spooner Ag Research Center. Nutrition ....................... 7 Milking ...........................7 Introduction the time and effort to learn about product development and marketing. Production Records ..8 prospective dairy-sheep producer Health ............................ 8 faces many potential challenges. First Sheep exhibit a natural ability to efficiently Conclusion ......................10 Aof all, any dairy operation requires process forage into meat, milk, and wool. References .....................
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Dairy Farming
    The Rise of Dairy Farming Wheat was the earliest and most important cash crop for white settlers in Wisconsin. It required a small initial capital investment and was fairly easy to grow, allowing farmers to harvest two crops a year. The high rate of financial return made wheat an especially attractive crop for homesteaders during the middle of the 19th century. Wheat provided a way for new immigrants in Wisconsin to farm cheaply and to deliver a product that many people needed. From 1840 to 1880, Wisconsin was considered "America's breadbasket" because one-sixth of the wheat grown in the nation came from Wisconsin. The early success of wheat farming helped Wisconsin's agriculture develop more rapidly than it did in other states. Despite its appeal, wheat also had risks and disadvantages. It was hard on the soil, which it quickly depleted of nitrogen. Depending on the vagaries of the weather and insect infestation, yield could vary substantially from year to year. By the late 1850s, the price of wheat began to drop as Wisconsin yields and quality diminished and competition increased from farmers in Iowa and Minnesota. Disaster struck in the 1860s, when tiny insects known as chinch bugs began devouring Wisconsin wheat crops. To meet these challenges, farmers began experimenting with a variety of alternatives to wheat. Feed crops, rather than cash crops, were better suited to Wisconsin's soil and climate, and came to characterize the state's agriculture in the late nineteenth century. Charles Rockwell was one of the earliest cheese makers in Wisconsin, beginning production at Koshkonong, near Fort Atkinson in Jefferson County, in 1837.
    [Show full text]
  • Driving Sustainability in Dairy Farming from a TBL Perspective: Insights from a Case Study in the West Region of Santa Catarina, Brazil
    sustainability Article Driving Sustainability in Dairy Farming from a TBL Perspective: Insights from a Case Study in the West Region of Santa Catarina, Brazil Antônio Zanin 1,* , Cristian Baú Dal Magro 1 , Diones Kleinibing Bugalho 1 , Francieli Morlin 2 , Paulo Afonso 3 and Andrzej Sztando 4 1 Department of Social and Applied Sciences, Community University of the Region of Chapecó, Chapecó (SC) 89809-900, Brazil; [email protected] (C.B.D.M.); [email protected] (D.K.B.) 2 Department of Social and Applied Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis (SC) 88040-900, Brazil; [email protected] 3 Department of Production and Systems, Algoritmi Centre, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; [email protected] 4 Department of Spatial Economy and Self-Governed Ministration, Wrocław University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 19 May 2020; Accepted: 29 June 2020; Published: 28 July 2020 Abstract: All companies in agribusiness supply chains need to be aware of the best use of available resources, which demands an integrated assessment of environmental, economic and social aspects, i.e., the Triple Bottom Line (TBL). Such analysis allows us to get a more balanced and complete understanding of the real performance of companies, supply chains and industries. Companies in the upstream of agribusinesses supply chains present some limitations, but can contribute significantly to the overall sustainability of the entire value chain. The objective of this research was to understand the role of the drivers of sustainability in dairy farming from a TBL perspective, such as assistance to producers and the value chain, and the use of better technology and management practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors and Components Affecting Dairy Smallholder Farmers and the Local Value Chain— Kvemo Kartli As an Example
    sustainability Article Factors and Components Affecting Dairy Smallholder Farmers and the Local Value Chain— Kvemo Kartli as an Example Rami Al Sidawi 1,*, Teo Urushadze 2 and Angelika Ploeger 1 1 Specialized Partnership in Sustainable Food Systems and Food Sovereignty, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, University of Kassel, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany; [email protected] 2 School of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, Agricultural University of Georgia, Tbilisi 0159, Georgia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-055-42981621 Abstract: Smallholder farmers are the cornerstone of the livestock sector and an essential element in building and developing the local dairy value chain, critical for developing its local economy. In Georgia, and despite the efforts made since independence from the Soviet Union until now, farmers still face many problems that prevent them from participating effectively in developing the dairy value chain, especially heavy metal pollution that afflicts the study region. This research study refers to smallholder farmers’ viewpoints in the Kvemo Kartli region on the dairy production sector and the problems these farmers face. This study also investigates the effect of several factors (ethical factors, traditions, animal welfare, cultural factors, etc.) on the dairy value chain. The convergence model was used in the mixed-method approach’s triangular design as a methodology for this research study. As part of the social data, 140 farmers who produce and sell milk and cheese in the Kvemo Kartli region were interviewed. The results showed the influence of the ethical, cultural, and traditional factors in developing the value chain.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ETHICS of KEEPING FUR ANIMALS, the ESTONIAN CONTEXT David Arney and Peep Piirsalu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE LATVIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. Section B, Vol. 71 (2017), No. 1/2 (706/707), pp. 78–80. DOI: 10.1515/prolas-2017-0013 Science life: Discussion THE ETHICS OF KEEPING FUR ANIMALS, THE ESTONIAN CONTEXT David Arney and Peep Piirsalu Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 46, Tartu, ESTONIA The discussion of the ethics of fur farming is currently important in Estonia, where the Estonian Parliament is due to make a judgement on the legality of farming animals for fur in the state. Al- though there is significant opposition among the local general population, and discussion in the popular and social media, there is little evidence of a coherent ethical reason why fur animals should not be farmed while we continue to permit the farming of other livestock animals. Ethical viewpoints of the rights and welfare of animals are presented here and these are contextualised with regard to fur farming and fur farming in Estonia in particular. Key words: ethics, fur farming, mink, chinchilla, blue fox. INTRODUCTION as human beings, the right not to be killed, the right not to be imprisoned. A detailed discussion of the concepts of ani- It first should be understood that there is no consensus in mal rights by the leading philosopher of this view (Regan, animal welfare science on the ethics or desirability of keep- 2001) and a refutation (Scroton, 2000) can be compared for ing of fur animals. The two sides of the argument for farm- those interested. At the more extreme end, this view pro- ing mink have been discussed by Vinke (2001) and Nimon hibits the use of animals for any purpose involving restrict- and Broom (1999), and foxes by Nimon and Broom (2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Good Dairy Farming Practice 2004 Guide to Good Dairy Farming Practice
    Guide to good dairy farming practice 2004 Guide to good dairy farming practice A joint publication of the International Dairy Federation and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations INTERNATIONAL DAIRY FEDERATION FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, January 2004 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations or of the International Dairy Federation concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ISBN 92-5-105094-5 All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to: Chief Publishing Management Service Information Division FAO Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy or by e-mail to: [email protected] © FAO and IDF 2004 Contents Foreword v Acknowledgements vi Introduction 1 About this guide 2 Guiding objective for good dairy farming practice 2 How are the guidelines presented? 3 Good agricultural practices 5 1. Animal health 5 2. Milking hygiene 6 3. Animal feeding and water 6 4. Animal welfare 7 5. Environment 8 Fact sheets 9 1.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue Farm Dream Becomes Reality for Farmer from Mexico
    Volume 21 · Number 3 The Bi-Monthly Periodical of the Midwest Organic and Sustainable Education Service May - June 2013 Farm Dream Becomes Reality for Farmer from Mexico By Joe Pedretti Rodrigo Cala was born in In 2005, following their Mexico City. His father was dreams to own a farm, Ro- a teacher and his mother drigo joined the Minnesota was a farmer. “We grew up Food Association for sup- on a small farm. Our home port. There he participated In This Issue was in one place and the and successfully completed farm was a little farther the Big River Farms Immi- News From MOSES....................2 away. We raised spinach, grant & Minority Farmer chard, broccoli and Mexican Training Program, Organic Inside Organics............................3 herbs. We also raised pigs. I Farming Training and GAP Crop insurance changes really learned farming from training over the course of my mother,” explained Ro- three years. A major com- Determination Yields Acres........4 drigo. ponent of the training pro- Transitioning to organic cropland gram is getting started by In 2001, Rodrigo’s younger Rodrigo Cala heads into the fields renting land and working Poetry Slam.................................5 brother, Juan Carlos, made at Cala Farms Origenes with experienced farmers. Two selections the economic decision to By the time Rodrigo was move to the United States for work. He found finished with the program, he was raising pep- MOSES Field Days & Events.......6 Several choices work at a factory in Stillwater, Minn., where pers, tomatoes, chard, spinach, Mexican herbs they make plastic milk bottles. Juan Carlos and summer squash–all organically, which was Proof Positive...............................7 talked Rodrigo into moving to Minnesota in a new concept to him.
    [Show full text]
  • Dairy Farms and Agricultural Prosperity in Virginia, 1890-1915 Harold E
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research Spring 1970 Dairy farms and agricultural prosperity in Virginia, 1890-1915 Harold E. Conover Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Recommended Citation Conover, Harold E., "Dairy farms and agricultural prosperity in Virginia, 1890-1915" (1970). Honors Theses. Paper 452. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND LIBRARIES llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 3 3082 01028 5350 c" .... o\Je..r DAIRY FARMS AND AGRICUL'IURAL PROSPERITY · IN VIRGINIA, 1890-1915 Enrold s. Conover Histor!'39'* May, i97n OUTLINE itral theme: The introduction and growth of a sound dairy industry from 1690 to 1915 ~elped restore Virginia &griculture to prosperityo Need for a dairy industry in Virginia A. Agricultural conditions in Virginia 1. Antebellum 2. >Post bellum B. Dairy farming and agricultural reform lo Dairy farms and the land .. a. Dairy farms and poor land b •. Virginia as a dairy region 2. Dairying and farm prosperity a. Profitability in comparison to staple crops b. market conditions for dairy products Introduction of the Virginia dairy industry A.,. Types of Virginia dairy_ operations 1. Whole milk sales a o Wholesale b'. Retail 2. Butte:r and cream trade a. Independent sales b. Cooperative creameries . 1. Early state encouragement 2. Creamery promoters 3. Government aid i. 3. Cheese-making B. Hindrances to the Virginia dairy industry 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Dairy Farming
    Advances in Dairy Farming Text Type: Informational Lexile Level: 1070L Mean Sentence Length 14.67 Mean Log Word Frequency 3.24 Word Count 792 California has been the nation’s top producing agricultural state for many years. Produce farms that grow fruits, vegetables and nuts ship their products all across the country. Successful dairy farms have also made California the top milk producing state in the nation. Advances in technology and the agricultural sciences helped make this achievement possible. Changes to milk production in this country didn’t happen quickly. The first cows arrived with Christopher Columbus on his second voyage in 1493. For hundreds of years thereafter, access to milk depended on owning a cow. As the number of farms increased, other agricultural products were put on wagons and sold in town. Milk was especially perishable and spoiled easily when there was no way to keep it cool. It was risky to transport milk. In the early 1900s, significant discoveries, inventions and new knowledge about safe milk handling brought big changes to milk production. The quality and safety of milk was improved when America learned about the pasteurization process developed by the French scientist Louis Pasteur. When the pasteurization process was applied to milk, it destroyed the harmful bacteria, germs and yeast in the milk. The process involves heating raw milk to 1620 degrees for 16 seconds then cooling it immediately to 390. When controlled refrigeration methods and refrigerated trucks were invented, transporting perishable foods like milk to different markets became profitable. The importance of keeping milk cool had always been known, but the technology and the science was not in place until the early 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Production: Dairy
    FARM TO PLATE STRATEGIC PLAN | 3.3 FOOD PRODUCTION: DAIRY ANALYSIS OF VERMONT’S FOOD SYSTEM Food Production: Dairy What role does dairy farming play in Vermont’s food system? What can be done to improve dairy farm viability over the next ten years? Vermont is the largest dairy producing state in New England, and Kimble’s folk art, from county fairs to the Burlington Cow Parade. U.S. Senator Patrick dairy products (milk, dairy beef, and forage crops grown for livestock) Leahy has described dairyman-turned-actor-turned-Senate candidate Fred Tuttle as account for upwards of 83% (≈ $584 million, adjusted for inflation to “the distilled essence of Vermonthood.” For over 100 years, dairy farming has had 2010 dollars) of the state’s agricultural products’ sales, and as much as significant economic, ecological, and cultural impacts in Vermont. 90% depending on market prices. Even though the number of dairy cows has declined, the average amount of milk produced per cow has increased, and total milk production has consistently exceeded 2 billion pounds of milk per year for the past 50 years. Value added dairy products including ice cream, cheese, butter, cottage cheese, yogurt, powdered milk, and other products also provide profitable opportunities for Vermont dairy farmers. Gross sales of Vermont’s processed dairy products total about $1.2 billion per year. Vermont’s dairy-centric landscape also contributes to the desirability of Vermont as a tourist destination. The Vermont Tourism Data Center estimates that at least 10 million people visited the Green Mountain State in 2009, many of whom were attracted by the beauty of the landscape.
    [Show full text]