DOCSLIB.ORG

Wetland and Grassland Restoration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wetland and Grassland Restoration Wetland and Grassland Restoration Name of Organization: North Dakota Natural Resources Trust Federal Tax ID#: 36-3512179 Contact Personrritle: Terry Allbee Address: 1605 E. Capitol Ave., Ste. 101 City: Bismarck State: North Dakota Zip Code: 58501-2102 E-mail Address: [email protected] Web Site Address: www.ndnrt.com Phone: 701-223-8501 Fax#: 701-223-6937 MAJOR Directive: 0 Directive A. Provide access to private and public lands for sportsmen, including projects that create fish and wildlife habitat and provide access for sportsmen; 0 Directive B. Improve, maintain, and restore water quality, soil conditions, plant diversity, animal systems and to support other practices of stewardship to enhance farming and ranching; X Directive C. Develop, enhance, conserve, and restore wildlife and fish habitat on private and public lands; and 0 Directive D. Conserve natural areas for recreation through the establishment and development of parks and other recreation areas. 1 Additional Directive: 0 Directive A. Provide access to private and public lands for sportsmen, including projects that create fish and wildlife habitat and provide access for sportsmen; X Directive B. Improve, maintain, and restore water quality, soil conditions, plant diversity, animal systems and to support other practices of stewardship to enhance farming and ranching; 0 Directive C. Develop, enhance, conserve, and restore wildlife and fish habitat on private and public lands; and 0 Directive D. Conserve natural areas for recreation through the establishment and development of parks and other recreation areas. Type of organization: 0 State Agency 0 Political Subdivision 0 Tribal Entity X Tax-exempt, nonprofit corporation, as described in United States Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. § 501 (c) Project Name: Water Storage and Grass Seeding Abstract/Executive Summary The foundation for many of North Dakota game and non-game wildlife species is the presence of water and grass available to complete their life cycles. The North Dakota Natural Resources Trust (Trust) has been involved in voluntary, private land projects involving wetlands and associated grasslands since the organization was established in 1986. Private landowners have a strong interest in partnering with the Trust to increase their natural resources, diversify their operations, and improve agricultural stewardship. The Trust would like to promote, through this Outdoor Heritage Grant, the restoration of wetlands and grasslands. The Trust is building upon a previously successful Outdoor Heritage Fund grant titled "Water Storage Piggyback". The Water Storage Piggyback (Piggyback) program provided a partnership with local, state, federal and nongovernmental organizations to restore, create, and enhance wetlands and other water storage areas. The partnering organization provided cost­ share to complete the necessary construction and technical assistance. The Piggyback program provided an upfront incentive to off-set agricultural production loss by reducing landowner risk and incentivizing participation. The Piggyback program has allocated the entire grant and match funds. All grant funds will be finalized by end of 2017. The Piggyback program was very well received by landowners and the Trust would like to continue an incentive-based water storage program with the assistance from Outdoor 2 Heritage Funds. In addition to the water storage, landowner interest in grass seeding has increased dramatically in the last several years. The Wetland and Grassland Restoration (WGR) grant proposal would assist landowners with the combination of both a one-time water storage incentive and assist with cost-share for seeding cropland acres to grass. The proposal will partner with landowners to prioritize acres that have the characteristic of annual agricultural cropping inputs with low or no crop productivity. By targeting lower productive areas the WGP will not only be valuable for wildlife species, but will help the landowner's financial bottom-line. The goal of WGR is to work with landowners to restore 700 surface acres of wetlands and to seed 1, 125 acres to grass. Amount of Grant request $292,500.00 Total Project Costs $500,000.00 Amount of Matching Funds $207,500.00 (41%) Cash - $141,875 In-kind - $65,625 Source(s) of Matching Funds NDNRT - $156,875 Landowners - $50,625 Certifications X I certify that this application has been made with the support of the governing body and chief executive of my organization. X I certify that if awarded grant funding none of the funding will be used for any of the exemptions noted on Page 1 of this application. Narrative Organization Information: The North Dakota Natural Resources Trust was created in 1986 and was originally called the North Dakota Wetlands Trust until 2000. The Trust's mission is to preserve, restore, manage, and enhance wetlands and associated wildlife habitat, grasslands, and riparian areas in the state of North Dakota. The Trust achieves this mission by partnering with agricultural and conservation organizations to: 1) promote the productive use of private agricultural lands private property rights that result in the enhancement and protection of private lands; 2) effectively use North Dakota's public lands both for agriculture and recreation; 3) promote good land use planning along urban river corridors, and 4) enhance the state's significant water resources. The Trust helps shape the landscape through its programs and does its best to help shape both public attitude and public policy to support natural resource protection. 3 The Trust is managed by a six-member Board of Directors. Three of the Directors are appointed by the governor of North Dakota, one by the National Audubon Society, one by the National Wildlife Federation, and one by the North Dakota Chapter of The Wildlife Society. The North Dakota Game and Fish Department director is an ex-officio member. The Trust has an Executive Director, three full-time staff and one part-time staff person. From its inception, the Trust has played a role as facilitator between agricultural and conservation interests. In addition to facilitating and funding sound, on-the-ground conservation of natural resources, its goal is to identify common issues, create dialogue, and resolve conflicts. Purpose of Grant - Describe the proposed project identifying how the project will meet the specific directive(s) of the Outdoor Heritage Fund Program * Identify project goals, strategies and benefits and your timetable for implementation. Include information about the need for the project and whether there is urgency for funding. Please indicate if this is a new project or if it is replacing funding that is no longer available to your organization. Identify any innovative features or processes of your project. If your project includes tree/shrub/grass planting, please provide a planting plan describing the site design, planting methods, number of trees/shrubs by species and stock size, grass species and future maintenance. A statement certifying that the applicant will adhere to USDA-NRCS tree/shrub/grass planting specifications along with the name of the governmental entity designing the planting may be substituted for a planting plan. If your project includes Section 319 program funding, please provide, in detail, the specific best management practices that will be implemented and the specific projects for which you are seeking funding. Please note that if your proposal provides funding to an individual, the names of the recipients must be reported to the Industrial Commission/Outdoor Heritage Fund. These names will be disclosed upon request. The 2015 North Dakota State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP) has eight elements that include: (1) information on the distribution and abundance of wildlife species, including low and declining populations; (2) descriptions of locations and relative condition of key habitats and community types; (3) problems affecting species and priority research or survey efforts needed; (4) conservation actions needed to conserve the identified species; (5) plans for monitoring species and the effectiveness of conservation actions; (6) plans for reviewing the plan; (7) coordinating with federal, state and local agencies and Tribal government on the development and implementation of the plan; (8) and involve broad public participation. The 2015 SWAP increased the number of species of conservation priority to 115. The current list includes 4 7 birds, two amphibians, nine reptiles, 21 mammals, 22 fish, 10 freshwater mussels and four insects. It is important to recognize that species of conservation priority often depend on several habitat types or landscape components for survival. The key to ensuring their long-term survival is to maintain diverse grasslands, wetlands, woodlands, rivers and streams. 4 The 2015 SWAP prioritizes conservation actions to assist the wildlife species with habitat for increasing their populations. The number one conservation action plan is to offer incentives and programs to protect, enhance, and restore habitat. The WGP goal is to do just that. Project Goals. Strategies and Benefits: The goal of WGR program is to restore approximately 700 surface acres of wetlands and 1, 125 acres of grass throughout the state of North Dakota. The WGR program will provide landowners a financial tool to off­ set the loss of agricultural production. This incentive will increase water storage and encourage landowner enrollment. In addition, the WGP will provide cost-share on purchasing grass
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 10. Amphibians of the Palaearctic Realm
    CHAPTER 10. AMPHIBIANS OF THE PALAEARCTIC REALM Figure 1. Summary of Red List categories Brandon Anthony, J.W. Arntzen, Sherif Baha El Din, Wolfgang Böhme, Dan Palaearctic Realm contains 6% of all globally threatened amphibians. The Palaearctic accounts for amphibians in the Palaearctic Realm. CogĄlniceanu, Jelka Crnobrnja-Isailovic, Pierre-André Crochet, Claudia Corti, for only 3% of CR species and 5% of the EN species, but 9% of the VU species. Hence, on the The percentage of species in each category Richard Griffiths, Yoshio Kaneko, Sergei Kuzmin, Michael Wai Neng Lau, basis of current knowledge, threatened Palaearctic amphibians are more likely to be in a lower is also given. Pipeng Li, Petros Lymberakis, Rafael Marquez, Theodore Papenfuss, Juan category of threat, when compared with the global distribution of threatened species amongst Manuel Pleguezuelos, Nasrullah Rastegar, Benedikt Schmidt, Tahar Slimani, categories. The percentage of DD species, 13% (62 species), is also much less than the global Max Sparreboom, ùsmail Uøurtaû, Yehudah Werner and Feng Xie average of 23%, which is not surprising given that parts of the region have been well surveyed. Red List Category Number of species Nevertheless, the percentage of DD species is much higher than in the Nearctic. Extinct (EX) 2 Two of the world’s 34 documented amphibian extinctions have occurred in this region: the Extinct in the Wild (EW) 0 THE GEOGRAPHIC AND HUMAN CONTEXT Hula Painted Frog Discoglossus nigriventer from Israel and the Yunnan Lake Newt Cynops Critically Endangered (CR) 13 wolterstorffi from around Kunming Lake in Yunnan Province, China. In addition, one Critically Endangered (EN) 40 The Palaearctic Realm includes northern Africa, all of Europe, and much of Asia, excluding Endangered species in the Palaearctic Realm is considered possibly extinct, Scutiger macu- Vulnerable (VU) 58 the southern extremities of the Arabian Peninsula, the Indian Subcontinent (south of the latus from central China.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps
    Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps DRAFT May 2009 South African National Biodiversity Institute Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Contents List of tables .............................................................................................................................. vii List of figures............................................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 8 2 Criteria for identifying threatened ecosystems............................................................... 10 3 Summary of listed ecosystems ........................................................................................ 12 4 Descriptions and individual maps of threatened ecosystems ...................................... 14 4.1 Explanation of descriptions ........................................................................................................ 14 4.2 Listed threatened ecosystems ................................................................................................... 16 4.2.1 Critically Endangered (CR) ................................................................................................................ 16 1. Atlantis Sand Fynbos (FFd 4) .......................................................................................................................... 16 2. Blesbokspruit Highveld Grassland
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Palaearctic Grasslands
    Phytocoenologia Vol. 46 (2016), Issue 3, 233–239 Special Issue Palaearctic grasslands Stuttgart, November 2016 Editorial Classification of Palaearctic grasslands Monika Janišová*, Jürgen Dengler & Wolfgang Willner Abstract Along with a brief introduction to the four research articles of the Special Issue “Classification of Palaearctic grasslands”, we present a bibliometric analysis of publication trends regarding classification of Palaearctic grass- lands in journals included in the Web of Science database. Regional studies (covering only a part of a country’s territory) prevailed (51%), but supra-national studies were more numerous (34%) than national overviews (15%). Four European countries (Austria, the Czech Republic, Italy and Slovakia) were included in the highest number of grassland classification studies (12 each). The publication of grassland classification studies in Web of Science journals continuously increased during the last 15 years. Festuco-Brometea and Molinio-Arrhenatheretea were the most frequently studied grassland classes. Phytocoenologia and Tuexenia were the most popular outlets for origi- nal grassland classification studies, while Journal of Vegetation Science had a leading position in publishing meth- odological articles with relation to grassland vegetation. Methods of unsupervised hierarchical classification were most common in grassland classification studies. Publications outside the Web of Science were not analysed al- though they represent an important source of knowledge in grassland classification. Keywords:
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation–Microclimate Feedbacks in Woodland–Grassland Ecotones
    Global Ecology and Biogeography, (Global Ecol. Biogeogr.) (2013) 22, 364–379 bs_bs_banner RESEARCH Vegetation–microclimate feedbacks in REVIEW woodland–grassland ecotones Paolo D’Odorico1*, Yufei He1, Scott Collins2, Stephan F. J. De Wekker1, Vic Engel3,4 and Jose D. Fuentes5 1Department of Environmental Sciences, ABSTRACT University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, Aim Climatic conditions exert a strong control on the geographic distribution of USA, 2Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 3South many woodland-to-grassland transition zones (or ‘tree lines’). Because woody Florida Natural Resource Center, Everglades plants have, in general, a weaker cold tolerance than herbaceous vegetation, their National Park, Homestead, FL, USA, 4USGS, altitudinal or latitudinal limits are strongly controlled by cold sensitivity. While Southeast Ecological Science Center, temperature controls on the dynamics of woodland–grassland ecotones are rela- Gainesville, FL, USA, 5Department of tively well established, the ability of woody plants to modify their microclimate and Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State to create habitat for seedling establishment and growth may involve a variety of University, University Park, PA, USA processes that are still not completely understood. Here we investigate feedbacks between vegetation and microclimatic conditions in the proximity to woodland– grassland ecotones. Location We concentrate on arctic and alpine tree lines, the transition between mangrove forests and salt marshes in coastal ecosystems, and the shift from shrub- land to grassland along temperature gradients in arid landscapes. Methods We review the major abiotic and biotic mechanisms underlying the ability of woody plants to alter the nocturnal microclimate by increasing the tem- peratures they are exposed to.
    [Show full text]
  • Tailoring Restoration Interventions to the Grassland-Savanna-Forest Complex in Central Brazil Isabel B
    OPINION ARTICLE Tailoring restoration interventions to the grassland-savanna-forest complex in central Brazil Isabel B. Schmidt1,2 , Maxmiller C. Ferreira3, Alexandre B. Sampaio4, Bruno M. T. Walter5,Daniel L. M. Vieira5 , Karen D. Holl6 Defining the reference system for restoration projects in regions characterized by complex vegetation mosaics is challenging. Here we use the Cerrado region of Brazil as an example of the importance of clearly defining multiple natural and anthro- pogenically altered states in grassland-savanna-forest mosaics. We define three main, natural vegetation types–grassland, savanna, and scleromorphic (cerradão) forest–to (1) distinguish between original and degraded states and (2) set appropriate targets for and guide restoration. We contend that the differences in Cerrado vegetation composition originally were driven by soil conditions and secondarily by fire frequency and precipitation patterns that differ from the core to the edge of the Cerrado region. Grasslands are found on the shallowest, least fertile soils and/or in waterlogged soils; scleromorphic forests are gen- erally located on deeper, more fertile soils; and savannas occupy an intermediate position. In recent decades, this biophysical template has been overlain by a range of human land-use intensities that strongly affect resilience, resulting in alternative anthropogenic states. For example, areas that were originally scleromorphic forest are likely to regenerate naturally follow- ing low- or medium-intensity land use due to extensive resprouting of woody plants, whereas grassland restoration requires reintroduction of grass and forb species that do not tolerate soil disturbance and exotic grass competition. Planting trees into historic grasslands results in inappropriate restoration targets and often restoration failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Grasslands, Shrublands, and Young Forest Habitats for Wildlife
    Darrel F. Covell UniversityChapter of New Hampshire 1. Introduction Cooperative Extension 131 Main Street, Room 216, Durham, NH 03824; [email protected] When we consider the tremendous diversity of habitats found in the northeastern United States (for the purposes of this publication, the “Northeast” refers to the geographic region that includes the following states: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia), we must ask ourselves, “Why narrowly focus the attention of an entire guide on grassland, shrubland, and young forest habitats?”. The answer lies in the problems of species and habitat declines, which biologists have noted over the last few centuries, especially in recent decades. For instance, 22 of 40 shrubland birds have significant declining population trends in the Northeast; 7 grassland birds are listed as endangered or threatened in at least one state in the region; American woodcock populations have declined by 40% over the past 30 years; New England cottontails occur in only 20% of the area historically occupied; 5 species of butterflies are thought to be extirpated from New England and numerous others associated with shrubland habitats are dramatically declining throughout the region. But are these declines simply natural events or ones that have been influenced by human impact? Just how has our use of the land been a factor in these declines? Let’s explore these questions. “Grasslands” is a broad term that applies to many open land habitats. Typically we think of grassy areas with no shrubs or trees and no agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Cover and Land Use Change in the US Prairie Pothole Region Using the USDA Cropland Data Layer
    land Article Land Cover and Land Use Change in the US Prairie Pothole Region Using the USDA Cropland Data Layer Woubet G. Alemu 1,* , Geoffrey M. Henebry 2,3 and Assefa M. Melesse 1 1 Department of Earth and Environment, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA; melessea@fiu.edu 2 Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 44824, USA; [email protected] 3 Center for Global Change and Earth Observations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 44823, USA * Correspondence: walemu@fiu.edu; Tel.: +1-786-709-8160 Received: 24 March 2020; Accepted: 18 May 2020; Published: 21 May 2020 Abstract: The Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) is a biotically important region of grassland, wetland, and cropland that traverses the Canada-US border. Significant amounts of grasslands and wetlands within the PPR have been converted to croplands in recent years due to increasing demand for biofuels. We characterized land dynamics across the US portion of the PPR (US–PPR) using the USDA Crop Data Layer (CDL) for 2006–2018. We also conducted a comparative analysis between two epochs (1998–2007 & 2008–2017) of the CDL data time series in the North Dakotan portion of the US–PPR. The CDL revealed the western parts of the US–PPR have been dominated by grass/pasture, to the north it was spring wheat, to the east and southern half, soybeans dominated, and to the south it was corn (maize). Nonparametric trend analysis on the major crop and land cover types revealed statistically significant net decreases in the grass/pasture class between 2006 and 2018, which accounts for more than a quarter of grass/pasture area within the US–PPR.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6.Pmd
    NaturalVegetation 6 andWildLife Salima was excited about the summer camp she was attending. She had gone to visit Manali in Himachal Let’sdo Pradesh along with her class mates. She recalled how surprised she was to see the changes in the landform Now can you tell why Salima saw changes and natural vegetation as the bus climbed higher and in the natural higher. The deep jungles of the foothills comprising sal vegetation as she and teak slowly disappeared. She could see tall trees climbed higher and with thin pointed leaves and cone shaped canopies on higher? What types of the mountain slopes. She learnt that those were coniferous vegetations did she trees. She noticed blooms of bright flowers on tall trees. see in the Himalayas These were the rhododendrons. From Manali as she was starting with the travelling up to Rohtang pass she saw that the land was foothills and going to covered with short grass and snow in some places. the higher altitudes? From Salima’s observations, we surmise Let’sdo that there is a close relationship between • Like Salima, when height of land and the you go to visit any character of vegetations. new place, notice With the change in height, the type of natural the climate changes and vegetation occurring that changes natural there and try to think of factors vegetation. The growth of Fig. 6.1: Rhododendron responsible for the vegetation depends on growth of such temperature and moisture. It also depends on factors vegetation in that like slope and thickness of soil. habitat. The type and thickness of natural vegetation varies • Note down if any from place to place because of the variation in these factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis Methodology Central African Republic
    CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC FLOOD SUSCEPTIBILITY & RISK ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY INTRODUCTION WORKFLOW The Central African Republic rainy season is intense due to the equatorial country's tropical climate. These rains have historically caused destruction of shelters, obstructed transportation routes, and increased incidence of diseases like cholera and malaria. Unfortunately, due to climate change, flood events are predicted to increase in frequency, magnitude and seasonality globally [9]. Floods are among the most frequent and costly natural disasters in terms of human and economic loss [10]. Mitigating the effect of natural disasters on vulnerable populations is becoming ever more relevant in humanitarian crisis intervention due to the looming climate crisis - particularly in countries like Central African Republic where livelihoods are largely dependent on subsistence agriculture. This country-wide analysis aims to provide humanitarian actors with an improved DATASETS understanding of the exposure of vulnerable populations to flooding in Central African Source Variable(s) Resolution Period Republic. Though this analysis does not represent comprehensive hydrological predictions, it can serve as a means to inform humanitarian programming relating to Africa SoilGrids Soil Drainage ~250 m 1960 - 2016 flood risk and preparedness. CHIRPS Daily: InfrarRed Precipitation w/ Station Data v2 Rain Intensity, Rain Duration ~0.05 arc degrees 1990-2020 RATIONALE World Wildlife Fund (WWF) HydroRivers v1.0 Drainage Density vector 2019 The objective of this
    [Show full text]
  • PARKS 20.1 Carbutt & Martindale
    PARKS 2014 Vol 20.1105 TEMPERATE INDIGENOUS GRASSLAND GAINS IN SOUTH AFRICA: LESSONS BEING LEARNED IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRY Clinton Carbutt*1 and Greg Martindale1 * Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife, PO Box 13053, Cascades, 3202, South Africa ABSTRACT The fragile state of temperate indigenous grasslands globally has galvanised action in the form of the Temperate Grasslands Conservation Initiative of the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s World Commission on Protected Areas. However, despite this initiative raising the profile of temperate grassland conservation on the global conservation agenda, one still requires country-based interventions at the hands of local conservation authorities, in collaboration with non-governmental organisations (NGOs), to improve protection levels on the ground. To this end we report on progress made with temperate indigenous grassland conservation in South Africa since 2006, a landmark heralding the birth of biodiversity stewardship in our temperate grassland biome. Since then an additional 124,983 ha of temperate grassland have been brought under formal protection with a further 96,641 ha in the declaration process, most of which should be secured by the end of 2014. We also discuss the driving forces underpinning these gains - namely the National Protected Area Expansion Strategy, the Grasslands Programme of the South African National Biodiversity Institute, provincial biodiversity stewardship units and funding channelled through the Critical Ecosystems Partnership Fund into civil society to augment the state’s contribution. Given the clear benefits derived from each intervention, we encourage other relevant countries with temperate indigenous grasslands to develop similar structures in the quest to safeguard representative, viable samples of one of the world’s great terrestrial biomes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spatial Analysis Approach to the Global Delineation of Dryland Areas of Relevance to the CBD Programme of Work on Dry and Subhumid Lands
    A spatial analysis approach to the global delineation of dryland areas of relevance to the CBD Programme of Work on Dry and Subhumid Lands Prepared by Levke Sörensen at the UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK January 2007 This report was prepared at the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC). The lead author is Levke Sörensen, scholar of the Carlo Schmid Programme of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). Acknowledgements This report benefited from major support from Peter Herkenrath, Lera Miles and Corinna Ravilious. UNEP-WCMC is also grateful for the contributions of and discussions with Jaime Webbe, Programme Officer, Dry and Subhumid Lands, at the CBD Secretariat. Disclaimer The contents of the map presented here do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 3 Table of contents Acknowledgements............................................................................................3 Disclaimer ...........................................................................................................3 List of tables, annexes and maps .....................................................................5 Abbreviations
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Risks in the Central Africa Regional Program for the Environment (Carpe) And
    FACT SHEET CLIMATE RISKS IN THE CENTRAL AFRICA REGIONAL PROGRAM FOR THE ENVIRONMENT (CARPE) AND CONGO BASIN OVERVIEW The Congo Basin is the world’s second largest tropical rainforest, home to rare biodiversity, and acts as a massive carbon sink, mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. To preserve this important ecosystem, USAID established the Central Africa Regional Program for the Environment (CARPE). Rising temperatures and rainfall changes impact landscapes targeted by CARPE in Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Republic of the Congo (ROC) and Central African Republic (CAR) (see map). These regions are characterized by significant social vulnerability, political instability and poverty. The livelihoods of some 80 million people depend on natural resources and forests, which cover nearly 2 million km2 across these three countries. Other livelihood activities include mining, climate-sensitive rainfed agriculture, fishing and hunting. Biodiversity across the region, including some of the only remaining populations of great apes and forest elephants, is highly endangered and will be further impacted as climate change alters species distribution and habitats. Urbanization has increased demand for charcoal and tropical forest products, placing additional pressure on the region’s forests. This profile describes climate risks across key sectors – forestry, agriculture, energy, water and health – in CARPE countries. (19, 21, 22, 24, 25) CLIMATE PROJECTIONS Increased risk 1.4–2.7°C increase in Increased variability temperatures by 2050
    [Show full text]