Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA SEPULVEDA DAM FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR DONALD C. TILLMAN WATER RECLAMATION PLANT EASEMENT IMPLEMENTATION Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) March 2019 Prepared By City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Sanitation This page intentionally left blank. Donald C. Tillman Treatment Plant Lease Renewal Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 PURPOSE OF INITIAL STUDY .......................................................................................................... 1-1 DOCUMENT FORMAT ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 CEQA PROCESS ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................ 2-1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 2-1 LOCATION ..................................................................................................................................... 2-1 SETTING ........................................................................................................................................ 2-1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 2-5 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................ 2-6 PROPOSED PROJECT ...................................................................................................................... 2-6 DIKE REHABILITATION .................................................................................................... 2-6 MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING ............................................................................................. 2-6 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ................................................................................. 2-9 PILOT PROJECTS ............................................................................................................... 2-9 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION .............................................................................................................. 2-9 DIKE REHABILITATION. ................................................................................................... 2-9 MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING ........................................................................................... 2-15 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ............................................................................... 2-15 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................. 2-15 PROJECT ACTIONS AND APPROVALS .......................................................................................... 2-16 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ............................................... 3-1 DETERMINATION ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .................................................................. 4-1 AESTHETICS (AES) ....................................................................................................................... 4-3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .............................................................................................. 4-3 REGULATORY SETTING .................................................................................................... 4-4 POTENTIAL IMPACTS ........................................................................................................ 4-4 MITIGATION ..................................................................................................................... 4-6 AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES (AFR) .......................................................................... 4-7 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .............................................................................................. 4-7 REGULATORY SETTING .................................................................................................... 4-7 POTENTIAL IMPACTS ........................................................................................................ 4-7 MITIGATION ..................................................................................................................... 4-8 AIR QUALITY (AIR) ...................................................................................................................... 4-9 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .............................................................................................. 4-9 REGULATORY SETTING .................................................................................................. 4-10 POTENTIAL IMPACTS ...................................................................................................... 4-11 MITIGATION ................................................................................................................... 4-13 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (BIO).................................................................................................. 4-15 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................................................................ 4-15 REGULATORY SETTING .................................................................................................. 4-17 POTENTIAL IMPACTS ...................................................................................................... 4-18 MITIGATION ................................................................................................................... 4-21 CULTURAL RESOURCES (CUL) ................................................................................................... 4-22 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................................................................ 4-22 REGULATORY SETTING .................................................................................................. 4-26 POTENTIAL IMPACTS ...................................................................................................... 4-30 City of Los Angeles Sanitation i 2019 Department of Public Works Donald C. Tillman Treatment Plant Lease Renewal Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration MITIGATION ................................................................................................................... 4-31 GEOLOGY AND SOILS (GEO) ...................................................................................................... 4-33 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................................................................ 4-33 REGULATORY SETTING .................................................................................................. 4-34 POTENTIAL IMPACTS ...................................................................................................... 4-34 MITIGATION ................................................................................................................... 4-37 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (GHG) ........................................................................................ 4-39 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................................................................ 4-39 REGULATORY SETTING .................................................................................................. 4-39 POTENTIAL IMPACTS ...................................................................................................... 4-40 MITIGATION ................................................................................................................... 4-41 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (HAZ) ................................................................................................ 4-42 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................................................................ 4-42 REGULATORY SETTING .................................................................................................. 4-45 POTENTIAL IMPACTS ...................................................................................................... 4-47 MITIGATION ................................................................................................................... 4-49 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY (WAT) .............................................................................. 4-51 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................................................................ 4-52 REGULATORY SETTING .................................................................................................. 4-53 POTENTIAL IMPACTS ...................................................................................................... 4-56 MITIGATION ................................................................................................................... 4-60 LAND USE AND LAND USE PLANNING (USE) ............................................................................. 4-62 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ...........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title California’s Mission Projects: The Spanish Imaginary in Riverside and Beyond Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1pp931x8 Author Sepulveda, Charles Anthony Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE California’s Mission Projects: The Spanish Imaginary in Riverside and Beyond A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ethnic Studies by Charles Anthony Sepulveda August 2016 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Robert Perez, Chairperson Dr. Anthony Macias Dr. Michelle Raheja Copyright by Charles Anthony Sepulveda 2016 The Dissertation of Charles Anthony Sepulveda is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There aren’t enough words to thank those who have helped me along the way, and this is merely a partial list. I have to begin by thanking my parents, Carolyn and Jim Thorsen - and - Charles and Gail Sepulveda, who provided me with the foundations necessary to make the choices I have in my life. My Aunt Billie who passed away in 2015 was one of my favorite people on this planet and I will be forever grateful to her. I miss her incredibly. I want to thank Irene Sepulveda- Hastings, one of the remaining elders from my Dad’s family – who I still need to interview! I have to thank the Belardes family; 2015 was a tough year, Chief David Belardes also passed. I want to remember and thank all of my family and ancestors who came before me.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future for Interurban Passenger Transport
    The future for interurban passenger transport M a d r i d Bringing citizens closer together 1 8 t h International Symposium on Transport Economics and Policy The future for interurban passenger transport Bringing citizens closer together Economic growth, trade and the concentration of population in large cities will intensify demand for interurban transport services. Concurrently, the need to manage environmental impacts effectively will increase. How successful we are in coping with demand will depend on our ability to innovate, to manage congestion, and The future to improve the quality of transport services. Technological and regulatory innovation will shape the future of transport. The Symposium brought together leading transport researchers from for interurban around the world to explore the future for interurban passenger transport. A first set of papers investigates what drives demand for interurban passenger transport and infers how it may evolve in the passenger future. The remaining papers investigate transport policy issues that emerge as key challenges: when to invest in high-speed rail, how to regulate to ensure efficient operation, how to assign infrastructure to transport different types of users, and how to control transport’s environmental footprint by managing modal split and improving modal performance. Bringing citizens closer together www.internationaltransportforum.org www.oecd.org/publishing -:HSTCSC=VUW[Z\: (74 2010 02 1 P) ISBN 978-92-821-0265-7 2010 18th International Symposium on Transport Economics and Policy 16-18 November 2009 MADRID The future for interurban passenger transport Bringing citizens closer together ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 30 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record-House House Of
    2088 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE FEBRUARY 28 By Mr. CARLSON: N. Y., favoring the passage of House bill 7593, widows and H. R. 8677. A bill granting a pension to Alfred Wiley, Jr.; orphans pension bill; to the Committee on World War Vet­ to the Committee on Invalid Pensions. erans' Legislation. By Mr. CHAPMAN: 6692. Also, petition of the Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce, H. R. 8678. A bill granting a pension to Gilbert Walton; to Brooklyn, N. Y., favoring sugar legislation that will protect the Committee on Invalid Pensions. ·4Jhe jobs of the Brooklyn, N.Y., sugar-refinery workers; to the H. R. 8679. A bill for the relief of the estate of Frank H. Committee on Foreign Affairs. Lusse, deceased, of Frankfort, Ky.; to the Committee on 6693. By Mr. KRAMER: Resolution of the Assembly and Claims. Senate of the State of California, relative to the continuance By Mr. DISNEY: of Japanese-beetle suppression under Federal auspices; to the H. R. 8680. A bill for the relief of Blanche Thompson; to Committee on Agriculture. the Committee on Claims. 6694. By Mr. MURRAY: Petition of I. P. Goult and Irvin By Mr. GREEN: Peterson, of VJ'automa, Wis., and others; to the Committee on H. R. 8681. A bill granting an increase of pension to James Ways and Means. · P. Case; to the Committee on Pensions. 6695. By Mr. SEGER: Petition of 750 residents of Paterson, By Mr. JOHNSON of West Virginia: N.J., and vicinity, opposing the enactment of Senate bill 2395, H. R. 8682. A bill granting a pension to Henry B.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture in Concrete
    CULTURE IN CONCRETE: Art and the Re-imagination of the Los Angeles River as Civic Space by John C. Arroyo B.A., Public Relations Minor, Urban Planning and Development University of Southern California, 2002 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF URBAN STUDIES AND PLANNING IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER IN CITY PLANNING at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2010 © 2010 John C. Arroyo. All Rights Reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. THESIS COMMITTEE A committee of the Department of Urban Studies and Planning has examined this Masters Thesis as follows: Brent D. Ryan, PhD Assistant Professor in Urban Design and Public Policy Thesis Advisor Susan Silberberg-Robinson, MCP Lecturer in Urban Design and Planning Thesis Reader Los Angeles River at the historic Sixth Street Bridge/Sixth Street Viaduct. © Kevin McCollister 2 CULTURE IN CONCRETE: Art and the Re-imagination of the Los Angeles River as Civic Space by John C. Arroyo Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on May 20, 2010 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master in City Planning ABSTRACT The Los Angeles River is the common nature of the River space. They have expressed physical, social, and cultural thread that themselves through place-based work, most of connects many of Los Angeles’ most diverse and which has been independent of any formal underrepresented communities, the majority of urban planning, urban design, or public policy which comprise the River’s downstream support or intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • ^SPOHTS - RTS H PMILA ELI TS • PITERN Sitio Ntu I L III
    yyy /H Eh 4\ \t\ \ art 1 ' ) V XIK ^SPOHTS - RTS H PMILA ELI TS • PITERN siTIO NtU i l III axQKaoaa pon staqogaaaqanaco^^ Volume 27 May - June 1989 Number 5 1988 U.S. BASEBALL CANCELS BY: Norman Rushefsky The 1988 baseball canrel program began in January with a special cancel at BUI'PEX' 88 honoring the opening of Pilot Held in Buffalo. New York.( see Fig. I) Pilot Field is the home field of the Buffalo Bisons, the Triple A minor league baseball team. Pilot Field actually had its opening day in April and a similar cancel was used on this occasion ( Fig. 2). Two similar Colorano cachets were prepared for these events. Pilot field - Home of the Bianns BASEBALL Fid. I III Feberary the Home Run Special cancel was once again used by the West Omaha Philatelic Society. This year their stamp show honored Stan " The Man " Musial (see Fig. 3). A similar cancel was also used August 27-28 at the society's August stamp s h o \v. 161 Pilot Field - Home of the Bisons sssbka OPEVrHS OF PUOT FELD... BASEBALL Fi*. 2 Eixx 11 r x iirinriri ixxiiirnii x ITX x x x x xxj " Roberto M Oemente £ HON*AS RVSHFISK f 171 BOSSlt UrUr AV HtXHrSTFH W V ^ ncxixixxiiiixxiiiixiiiiiiriiixxiixixxx Fie. 3 162 jIX r XXX x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ^ ROCKFORD ^•f vs. )( BCLOiT / \ us^c ^l3c • } P SOKMAS RUSHFTSK "s^fc- i pi »*«! MUI <v H& arxurJTTn.« r « 1SSII : u xx xixxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxy F.». «T In April the opening day of minor league baseball in Rockford.
    [Show full text]
  • Sepulveda Dam Basin
    Sepulveda Dam Basin Los Angeles County, California Master Plan and Environmental Assessment SEPTEMBER 2011 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District P.O. Box 532711 Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325 Funding provided in part by The American Recovery And Reinvestment Act (Public Law 111-5) Sepulveda Dam Basin Los Angeles County, California Master Plan and Environmental Assessment SEPTEMBER 2011 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District P.O. Box 532711 Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325 Funding provided in part by The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Public Law 111-5) Sepulveda Dam Basin Master Plan and Environmental Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Master Plan and Draft Environmental Assessment for Sepulveda Dam Basin is an update to the 1981 Sepulveda Basin Master Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report/Statement and 1995 Supplement 1 to the 1981 Sepulveda Basin Master Plan Including Environmental Assessment. The Federal project, Sepulveda Dam Flood Control Project, (Dam or Project) refers to the structures, amenities, and lands necessary for operation of the Dam. The Sepulveda Dam Basin (Basin) refers to the lands acquired for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Project. A U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Master Plan for an authorized civil works project is a conceptual Project-specific document. It describes the existing resources in the Basin and provides a guide for Corps land management responsibilities and decisions in regard to project lands, water, and associated resources. The Master Plan provides direction and guidance for land development and utilization in the Basin pursuant to applicable Federal laws, regulations, and policies.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Earthquakes, 1979 Open-File Report 84-979 Prepared
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY United States Earthquakes, 1979 By Carl W. Stover and Carl A. von Hake Open-File report 84-979 Prepared in cooperation with National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, This report has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. 1984 Contributors Contributors to this publication are listed below according to the information furnished or service performed: Hypocenters and magnitudes: W. LeRoy Irby, U.S. Geological Survey Reino Kangas, U.S. Geological Survey John H. Minsch, U.S. Geological Survey Russ Needham, U.S. Geological Survey Waverly J. Person, U.S. Geological Survey Bruce W. Presgrave, U.S. Geological Survey Robert Y. Koyanagi, Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, U.S. Geological Survey Intensities: Carl U. Stover, U.S. Geological Survey Robert Y. Koyanagi, Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, U.S. Geological Survey Network Operations (by institution): University of Alaska University of California, Berkeley California Institute of Technology Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, U.S. Geological Survey Kansas Geological Survey University of Kansas Lament-Doherty Geological Observatory, Columbia University University of Minnesota Oklahoma Geological Survey St. Louis University Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University University of Washington Weston Observatory, Boston College Geodesy: Sandford R. Holdahl, NOAA, NOS, National Geodetic Survey Richard A. Snay, NOAA, NOS, National Geodetic Survey Tsunamis: Mark G. Spaeth, NOAA, National Weather Service Strong-motion
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Sepulveda Transit Corridor Project Public Comments
    Metro Sepulveda Transit Corridor Project Public Comments - March 2018 - September 2019 Date Received Comment Source Comment 03/04/18 Project Email Are you planning to charge people to use Express Lanes on the 405 between the 10 and the 101? I just did the survey online that I got in my email. The last question asked me about which community I use the 405 corridor to reach, and I assumed I could enter more than one choice, but after clicking on one response option it kicked me to the end. The 405 corridor, for myself and for a lot of other people I know 04/20/18 Project Email who live in the Valley, is sometimes used sporadically, not as a regular commute option, so therefore sometimes I go to LAX and sometimes to a professional meeting, and sometimes to Century City and other times to Santa Monica. Therefore I found it difficult to answer some of the questions! Can I send the survey to other people who I know use the 405 or is it only for people who have subscribed to Metro emails? Please consider extending the Sepulveda transit project further north to the north end of the San Fernando Valley along Sepulveda and/or the 405. I know 04/20/18 Project Email about the east valley line planned for Van Nuts Blvd. But we need something down the middle of the San Fernando Valley, and the 405/Sepulveda street is the dividing line. It also intersects the 118 and the 101, which is perfect for park and ride.
    [Show full text]
  • Weather and Climate Inventory National Park Service Mediterranean Coast Network
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado Weather and Climate Inventory National Park Service Mediterranean Coast Network Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/MEDN/NRTR—2007/006 ON THE COVER Santa Cruz Island, Channel Islands National Park Photograph copyrighted by Greg McCurdy Weather and Climate Inventory National Park Service Mediterranean Coast Network Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/MEDN/NRTR—2007/006 WRCC Report 2007-02 Christopher A. Davey, Kelly T. Redmond, and David B. Simeral Western Regional Climate Center Desert Research Institute 2215 Raggio Parkway Reno, Nevada 89512-1095 April 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the National Park Service conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resources Technical Reports series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that address natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientific literature reviews; and peer-reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWS in BRIEF High-Speed Motorhome Chase Ends at Tampa and Wells
    New on the Menu! Library Book Restaurant Sale Set; Openings and Check Valley Closings Entertainment See page 47-9 Louisville Does it Again! See page 11 See page 7 ValleyVolume 35, Issue 12 A CompendiousVantage Source of Information May 23, 2019 NEWS IN BRIEF High-Speed Motorhome Chase Ends at Tampa and Wells A high-speed chase of a stolen motorhome driven by a suspected drunk driver Tuesday night ended in the San Fernando Valley after the RV hit multiple vehicles before eventually crashing into a tree in Tarzana. Identified as Julie Ann Rainbird, 52, of Winnetka, the woman began the chase in the Towsley Canyon area before the pursuit ended near the intersection of Tampa Avenue and Wells Drive. Driving with two dogs on her lap, Rainbird ran multiple red lights, drove on the wrong side of the streets and at one point, broadsided a car. Near the end of the chase, the motorhome ran into a palm tree, tearing the front and Canoga Park Honors Veterans on Memorial Day right side of the vehicle apart. During the mayhem of the chase, one of the dogs was ejected from the motorhome. This year, the Canoga in the United States. Mark Neudorff declared, “It’s After crashing for a final time at Tampa Avenue and Park Memorial Parade will be Miri Rossitto, president of an honor for the Chamber of Wells Drive, injuring a motorist who was backing out of a honoring fallen veterans from all Woodland Hills-based COWE Commerce to be the host of this driveway, Rainbird attempted to run from the officers, her military campaigns, including the Consulting, will emcee the event.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Ioc Evaluation Commission 2024 2 Introduction
    REPORT OF THE IOC 2024 EVALUATION COMMISSION LOS ANGELES PARIS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 3 KEY FEATURES (VIDEO)................................................ 8 Candidature Process 2024 and the Los Angeles and Paris Projects LOS ANGELES 2024 .......................................................... 13 PARIS 2024 .................................................................................... 49 ANNEXES ................................................................................................ 85 REPORT OF THE IOC EVALUATION COMMISSION 2024 2 INTRODUCTION REPORT OF THE IOC EVALUATION COMMISSION 2024 3 THE EVALUATION PROCESS The Candidate Cities for the Olympic Games 2024 are the first to receive the full benefits of the significant changes that resulted from Olympic Agenda 2020, the IOC’s strategic roadmap for the future of the Olympic Movement. The result was a much more collaborative relationship between the IOC and the candidates, increased transparency and a stronger emphasis on sustainability and legacy, while providing more flexibility for cities to design Games that meet local needs — all of which contributed to excellent proposals from the two cities. The IOC reduced the cost of the candidatures by providing more technical exper- tise, with help from the Summer Olympic International Sports Federations, the IOC’s TOP sponsors and independent organisations such as the International Un- ion for the Conservation of Nature for issues related to
    [Show full text]
  • Payment Services Directive
    Register of Payment Institutions who have been authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland pursuant to Regulation 18 of the European Union (Payment Services) Regulations 2018. This Register contains details of Payment Institutions and their agents and branches who are currently authorised or who have previously been authorised and have had their authorisation withdrawn. It is maintained under Regulation 25 of the European Union (Payment Services) Regulations 2018. Ref No. Name and Address Date Authorised Date Payment Passporting To Basis of Establishment Agents Authorisation Services Withdrawn C11208 Primafinance Limited 11 Jul 2018 6 t/a PrimaFinance Debt Solutions 77 New Street Killarney Kerry V93YCY5 Ireland C42802 InterPay Limited 2 Jul 2018 3a, 3b, 3c, 6 Austria Freedom of Service t/a Transfermate, Transfermate Global Belgium Freedom of Service Payments, Pay to Study Bulgaria Freedom of Service IDA Business & Technology Park Cyprus Freedom of Service Ring Road Czech Republic Freedom of Service Ireland Denmark Freedom of Service Estonia Freedom of Service Finland Freedom of Service France Freedom of Service Germany Freedom of Service Greece Freedom of Service Hungary Freedom of Service Italy Freedom of Service Latvia Freedom of Service Lithuania Freedom of Service Luxembourg Freedom of Service Malta Freedom of Service Netherlands Freedom of Service Poland Freedom of Service Portugal Freedom of Service Romania Freedom of Service Slovakia Freedom of Service Slovenia Freedom of Service Spain Freedom of Service Sweden Freedom of Service Croatia Freedom of Service Iceland Freedom of Service Liechtenstein Freedom of Service Run Date: 09 June 2021 Page 1 of 1610 Norway Freedom of Service C47862 First Merchant Processing (Ireland) 11 Jul 2018 5 Austria Freedom of Service D.A.C.
    [Show full text]