DOCSLIB.ORG

The Due Diligence Principle and the Role of the State: Discrimination Against Women in Family and Cultural Life

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Due Diligence Principle and the Role of the State: Discrimination Against Women in Family and Cultural Life DUE DILIGENCE PROJECT’S THE DUE DILIGENCE PRINCIPLE AND THE ROLE OF THE STATE: DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN IN FAMILY AND CULTURAL LIFE Zarizana Abdul Aziz and Janine Moussa, Co-Directors, Due Diligence Project Submission to the United Nations Working Group on Discrimination Against Women in Law and in Practice January 2015 Table of Contents Heading Page I. Introduction 1 a. Situational context 1 b. Purpose of Submission 3 c. Concepts and terminology 3 II. Contributions to discourse 4 1. Due Diligence Framework and the Role of the State 4 2. Culture 5 a. Basic premise 5 b. Factors that influence culture 8 c. Sites and actors 11 3. Family 16 a. Various Forms of Family 16 b. Rights and violations experienced within the family 19 c. Plural legal systems 22 III. Recommendations and State Obligation 23 a. On Culture 25 b. On Family 27 c. On Plural Legal Systems 28 i I. Introduction The Due Diligence Project1 (DDP) welcomes the UN Working Group thematic focus on Discrimination against the Women in Family and Cultural Life. The purpose of this contribution is to highlight new and innovative thinking beyond the current language and discourse in understanding and conceptualizing discrimination against women in family and cultural life, to critically examine crucial basic concepts which adds to this understanding and to look at discrimination against women in family and cultural life through the lens of the State Obligation. The lens of State Obligation is presented through the Due Diligence Framework developed by the Due Diligence Project.2 a. Situational context There is a growing wave of conservatism, in the name of culture and religion, threatening to repudiate women’s human rights norms and standards. At the national level, States are passing laws and by-laws restricting women’s rights, agency and mobility. For example, Buddhist Women’s Marriage Bill (Myanmar) which restricts Buddhist women’s rights to marry or cohabit with men of other faiths. The Bill is based on a petition presented by a coalition of nationalist Buddhist monks known as the Organization for the Protection of Race, Religion, and Belief. 3 Another example is the Anti-Pornography Law (Indonesia) which definition of pornography includes women’s dressing “that violates the moral values of society”. The anti-pornography law was promoted by a small group of Islamist parties, and passed by parliament in October 2008.4 At the international level, Human Rights Council resolutions on Promoting human rights and fundamental freedoms through a better understanding of traditional values of humankind,5 Combating defamation of religions6 and Protection of the Family7 all draw on ‘traditional and cultural values’ to mediate human rights norms. 1 The Due Diligence Project (DDP) is a global project which explores and unpacks the international legal principle of ‘due diligence’ in the context of violence against women. www.duediligenceproject.org 2 Zarizana Abdul Aziz and Janine Moussa, The Due Diligence Framework: Framework on State Accountability to Eliminate Violence against Women, International Human Rights Initiative, 2014. The Due Diligence Framework contains guidelines in the five areas of State Obligation, namely prevention, protection, prosecution, punishment and provision of redress and reparation. Available at www.duediligenceproject.org/Resources.html 3 Zarni Mann, Monk Conference Backs Bills to Restrict Interfaith Marriage, Rohingya Voting, The Irrawaddy, 16 January 2014, available at http://www.irrawaddy.org/burma/monk-conference-backs-bills-restrict-interfaith- marriage-rohingya-voting.html. Last visited 15 January 2015. 4 Olivia Rondonuwu, Indonesia's constitutional court defends pornography law, Reuters, 25 March, 2010, available at http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/03/25/us-indonesia-pornography-idUSTRE62O28R20100325 (last visited 15 January 2015) 5 Human Rights Council resolution A/HRC/RES/16/3 (2012) Promoting human rights and fundamental freedoms through a better understanding of traditional values of humankind. 6 Human Rights Council, Resolution A/HRC/RES/13/16 (2010) Combating defamation of religions. 7 Human Rights Council resolution A/HRC/26/L.20/Rev.1 (2014) Protecting the family. 1 Gender stereotypes are reinforced and legitimised by the traditional roles of men and women said to have their basis in conservative interpretations of culture and religion. Women’s human rights claims are rejected as being not part of “our culture”. This is compounded by the global north’s essentialisation of gender discrimination as “the others’ culture” deserving of non-interference. Although these stereotypes permeates all facets of women’s lives, often supported by constitutional and legal systems, women’s human rights are particularly threatened in the realm of the family, and are often regulated by what is known as personal laws on marriage and divorce, guardianship of children (and at times, of women) and succession as well as violence against women in particular sexual violence and intimate partner violence.8 Cultural rights are essential to the recognition and respect of human dignity and must include non-discrimination and equality principles. Whereas the right to express and enjoy one’s culture and religion is protected by international human rights law9, it cannot be fulfilled at the expense of other fundamental human rights, nor at the expense of the fundamental rights of others (irrespective of whether they are from the same or different culture or religion).10 The right to culture also includes the freedom to contribute in the creation of culture and its replication in everyday life. Culture is neither static nor monolithic. The State has a role to play in mediating these competing and, at times complementary, interests. Article 5 of the Convention on All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) reaffirms this by declaring that States have an obligation to “take all appropriate measures to modify the social and cultural patterns of conduct of men and women, with a view to achieving the elimination of prejudices and customary and all other practices which are based on the idea of the inferiority or the superiority of either of the sexes or on stereotyped roles for men and women”. State responsibility has further expanded over the years to include not only the State obligation not to violate human rights, but its obligation to exercise due diligence to ensure that violations of human rights, whether committed by State actors or non-State actors are eliminated. In examining the relationship between discrimination against women, culture and religion, the due diligence principle is all the more important as States have tremendous power, ability and interest in moulding, tolerating, encouraging and developing values and culture. States should take measures to protect women and girls against negative social and cultural practices that are harmful to their well-being, dignity and health. 8 Guardianship of women requires that a woman is I perpetual need of a male guardian (wilayat). 9 See HRC resolution A/HRC/10/23 (2009) reaffirming “that cultural rights are an integral part of human rights, which are universal, indivisible, interrelated and interdependent”, para. 1. 10 Ibid, “[N]o one may invoke cultural diversity to infringe upon human rights guaranteed by international law.”, para. 4. See also UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity (2001), Article 4. 2 b. Purpose of submission Discrimination against women in family and cultural life has stood out as one of the underlying causes in the Due Diligence Project’s extensive three year research-advocacy on violence against women. Likewise, the role of the State as the entity ultimately responsible for preventing and addressing human rights abuses has also been a central approach to the work of the Due Diligence Project. Given this and the current socio-economic context, the DDP convened an expert group meeting on 2-3 December 2014 on the Role of the State and Discrimination against Women in Family and Cultural Life.11 The meeting brought together experts from diverse religious and cultural backgrounds with expertise in the area of women’s human rights to critically explore, analyse, and formulate strategies on human rights and its intersections with culture and religion with particular attention to their impact on the family through the lens of State obligation. Outcomes of this expert meeting as well as independently conducted research in the area by the DDP are contained in this document. The document is offered as a contribution to the discourse on this critical and complex issue and to the UN Working Group for consideration in its 2015 annual thematic report on Discrimination against Women in Family and Cultural Life. c. Concepts and terminology For purposes of this report, the following terms should be taken to mean : ▪ Discrimination against ‘women’ should be taken to include discrimination against lesbians, bisexual women and transgendered individuals. ▪ ‘Cultural life’ also has an expansive and amorphous meaning. It includes the space within which we live, work, and play and encompasses the realms of religion, traditions, custom, arts, sports and education. ▪ ‘Family’ is the basic unit of society which can take diverse forms12 requiring both recognition and protection by the State, when in line with international human rights norms and standards. 11 The meeting was hosted by The Robert F Kennedy (RFK) Center for Justice and Human Rights and supported by Association for Women’s Rights in Development (AWID), United Nations Development Fund (UNDP), UN Women Asia-Pacific, The Carter Center and the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights (OHCHR). 12 See section II (3), p. 16 infra. 3 II. CONTRIBUTIONS TO DICSOURSE 1. Due Diligence Framework and the Role of the State The ‘due diligence principle’, as it is commonly termed, holds States accountable for human rights abuses committed not only by the State or State actors, but also by non-State actors. Discrimination against women is perpetrated by both State and non-State actors.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Culture and Materialism : Raymond Williams and the Marxist Debate
    CULTURE AND MATERIALISM: RAYMOND WILLIAMS AND THE MARXIST DEBATE by David C. Robinson B.A. (Honours1, Queen's University, 1988 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS (COMMUNICATIONS) in the ,Department of Communication @ David C. Robinson 1991 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY July, 1991 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL NAME: David Robinson DEGREE: Master of Arts (Communication) TITLE OF THESIS: Culture and Materialism: Raymond Williams and the Marxist Debate EXAMINING COMMITTEE: CHAIR: Dr. Linda Harasim Dr. Richard S. Gruneau Professor Senior Supervisor Dr. Alison C. M. Beale Assistant Professor Supervisor " - Dr. Jerald Zaslove Associate Professor Department of English Examiner DATE APPROVED: PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENCE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis or dissertation (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of Thesis/Dissertation: Culture and Materialism: Raymond Williams and the Marxist Debate Author : signature David C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elimination of Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation
    The elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation L’élimination de la discrimination en matière d’emploi et de profession La eliminación de la discriminación en materia de empleo y ocupación COUNTRY BASELINE UNDER THE ILO DECLARATION ANNUAL REVIEW (2000-2012) 1: BAHRAIN ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION IN RESPECT OF EMPLOYMENT AND OCCUPATION (DISC) REPORTING Fulfilment of government’s YES, except for the 2011 Annual Review (AR). No change reports for the 2004, 2005 and 2009-2010 Annual Reviews (ARs). reporting obligations Involvement of employers’ YES, according to the Government: Involvement of the Bahrain Chamber of Commerce and Industry (BCCI) and the General and workers’ organizations Federation of Bahrain Trade Unions (GFBTU) through written consultations. in the reporting process OBSERVATIONS BY Employers’ organizations 2012 AR: Observations by the BCCI. THE SOCIAL PARTNERS 2008 AR: Observations by the BCCI. 2007 AR: Observations by the BCCI. Workers’ organizations 2012 AR: Observations by the GFBTU. 2011 AR: Observations by the GFBTU. 2010 AR: Observations by the GFBTU. 2009 AR: Observations by the GFBTU. 2008 AR: Observations by the GFBTU. 2007 AR: Observations by the GFBTU. 2006 AR: Observations by the GFBTU. 2003 AR: Observations by the ICFTU. 2001 AR: Observations by the ICFTU. 1 Country baselines under the ILO Declaration Annual Review are based on the following elements to the extent they are available: governments’ reports, observations by employers’ and workers’ organizations, case studies prepared under the auspices of the country and the ILO, and observations/recommendations by the ILO Declaration Expert-Advisers and by the ILO Governing Body. For any further information on the realization of this principle and right in a given country, in relation with a ratified Convention, please see: www.ilo.org/ilolex.
    [Show full text]
  • The Joint Commission: Cultural Diversity
    The Joint Commission: Cultural Diversity Cultural Diversity Lesson Information Purpose To provide healthcare workers with information to increase their knowledge and to help them meet the requirements of The Joint Commission, Occupational Safety & Health Administration, and other regulatory bodies, with the goal of providing safe, competent, and quality patient care. Abstract America is a nation of immigrants. Most Americans' ancestors came from other countries with different languages, customs, and systems of belief. Showing respect for your patients' cultural, spiritual, and psychosocial values demonstrates cultural competency.1 Cultural competency enables healthcare workers to understand their patient's expectations about the care, treatment, and services they receive. This lesson briefly describes the cultural differences that you may encounter when providing care to patients. Objectives Upon completion of this lesson, you will be able to: 1. Define the terms related to culture. 2. Recognize cultural differences among Americans. 3. List interventions that healthcare workers can use to meet the needs of culturally diverse patients. Consultants Contributors Dana Armstrong, RN, MSN Senior Clinical Systems Analyst Mississippi Baptist Health Systems Jackson, Mississippi Reviewers Jodi Nili, RN Quality Management Coordinator Community Regional Medical Center Fresno, California Stephanie Wiedenhoeft, RN, CPHRM, CPHQ Risk Manager Community Medical Centers Fresno, California Copyright © 2016 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved. All rights reserved. Except as specifically permitted herein, no part of this product may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including input into or storage in any information system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The Forms and Figures may be displayed and may be reproduced in print form for instructional purposes only, provided a proper copyright notice appears on the last page of each print-out.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample IDI Intercultural Development Plan (IDP)
    Intercultural Development Inventory® Intercultural Development Plan Prepared for: Carl M , Example Group Prepared by: IDI Qualified Administrator, IDI, LLC The Intercultural Development Inventory® (IDI®) is protected by copyright and is the proprietary IDI, LLC property of Mitchell R. Hammer, Ph.D., and IDI LLC. Intercultural Development Inventory and IDI are registered trademarks of Mitchell R. Hammer, Ph.D., and IDI, LLC. You may not use, copy, http://idiinventory.com/ display, distribute, modify, or reproduce any of the trademarks found in this Report except as [email protected] expressly authorized by IDI, LLC. Carl M , Example Group Page | 2 Your Intercultural Development Plan (IDP) Completing the Intercultural Development Inventory® (IDI®) and reviewing your own IDI Individual Profile Report provides key insights into how you make sense of cultural differences and commonalities. The next step is to systematically increase your intercultural competence—from where you are to where want to be—by designing and implementing your own Intercultural Development Plan® (IDP®). This IDP is specifically customized to your own IDI profile results and is an effective way for you to increase your skills in navigating cultural differences. After completing your IDP, you may consider taking the IDI again to determine your progress in increasing your intercultural competence. Should you select this option, a second customized IDP would then be produced based on your most recent IDI profile results, thus providing further intercultural development. By completing your Individual Development Plan, you can: • Gain insights concerning intercultural challenges you are facing and identify intercultural competence development goals that are important for you, • Gain increased understanding of how your Developmental Orientation impacts how you perceive and respond to cultural differences and commonalities, and • Identify and engage in targeted, developmental efforts that increase your intercultural competence in bridging across diverse communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Climate Resilience of the Water Sector in Bahrain
    SAP003: Enhancing Climate Resilience of the Water Sector in Bahrain | | B.2 Kingdom of Bahrain UN Environment 1/15 16 January 2019 Enhancing Climate Change Resilience of the Water Sector in Bahrain Gender Assessment and Social Inclusion Action Plan NOGA September 2018 1B074301 Rev 02 Office 901, 9th Floor, The Address Tower P.O. Box 10379 AlSeef Area Kingdom of Bahrain Tel: +973 1753 3259 Fax: +973 1753 3754 [email protected] Enhancing Climate Resilience and Water Security in Bahrain Title Gender Assessment and Social Inclusion Action Plan Date September 2018 Author Eman Rafea Document History File Name, Revision Number Status Date 1B074301, GASIAP, Rev 00 Draft 13.08.18 1B074301, GASIAP, Rev 01 Final 21.08.18 1B074301, GASIAP, Rev 02 Final 6.09.18 Checked By Andy Booth Initials/Date 6.09.18 Approved By Halel Engineer Initials/Date 6.09.18 Copyright©2018, Environment Arabia, All Rights Reserved. The information in this report shall not be disclosed, duplicated, used in whole or in part for any purpose. A written approval from Environment Arabia shall be obtained prior to use of this document. 1B074301, GASIAP, Rev 02 September 2018 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Background to the Project 1 1.3 Project Description 1 1.4 Gender and Social Analysis 3 1.4.1 Introduction 3 2 GENDER AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT 4 2.1 Regulatory Framework 4 2.2 Demographic Information 5 2.2.1 Population of Bahrain 5 2.2.2 Education and Employment 6 2.2.3 Marriage and Family Structure 7 2.2.4 Access to Financial Resources 7 2.2.5 Leadership and Political Rights 8 2.2.6 Quality of Life and Health Care 9 2.2.7 Civil Liberties 9 2.2.8 NGOs and Support Groups 10 2.2.9 Disabled Groups 10 3 GENDER AND SOCIAL ANALYSIS 12 4 GENDER AND SOCIAL INCLUSION ACTION PLAN 13 5 CONCLUSION 16 6 REFERENCES 16 Tables Table 1.1 Project Components and Outputs ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration and Acculturation
    T h i r d E d i t i o n Shuang Liu, Zala VolČiČ & Cindy Gallois INTRODUCING Intercultural Communication • GLOBAL CULTURES AND CONTEXTS • LIU_aw.indd 6 00_LIU ET AL_FM.indd 3 05/06/2018 13:18 10/11/2018 12:50:50 PM 9 Immigration and Acculturation LEARNING OBJECTIVES At the end of this chapter, you should be able to: • Understand immigration as a major contributor to cultural diversity. • Explain culture shock and reverse culture shock. • Critically review acculturation models. • Identify the communication strategies that facilitate cross-cultural adaptation. 09_LIU ET AL_CH-09.indd 213 13/11/2018 4:02:17 PM 214 Introducing Intercultural Communication INTRODUCTION It goes without saying that our society is becoming more culturally and linguistically diverse by the day. An important contributor to cultural diversity is the migration of people. Some undertake voluntary migration and others are forced to do so: immigrants, refugees, asylum seekers, businesspeople, international students and so on. Globalization and communication technologies not only redefine the mobility of people in contemporary societies, they also delineate new parameters for interpreting immigration. Historically, immigration referred to the restricted cross-border movements of people, emphasizing the permanent relocation and settlement of usually unskilled, often indentured or contracted labourers who were displaced by political turmoil and thus had little option other than resettlement in a new country. Today, growing affluence and the emergence of a new group of skilled and educated people have fuelled a new global movement of migrants who are in search of better economic opportunities, an enhanced quality of life, greater political freedom and higher expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Our Culture Make Us Similar and Different?
    NEW YORK STATE SOCIAL STUDIES RESOURCE TOOLKIT 3rd Grade Cultural Diversity Inquiry How Does Our Culture Make Us Similar and Different? © iStock / © yellowcrestmedia. Supporting Questions 1. What is culture? 2. How does history impact cultures around the world today? 3. How are the lives of children similar and different in global communities? THIS WORK IS LICENSED UNDER A CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION- NONCOMMERCIAL- SHAREALIKE 4.0 INTERNATIONAL LICENSE. 1 NEW YORK STATE SOCIAL STUDIES RESOURCE TOOLKIT 3rd Grade Cultural Diversity Inquiry How Does Our Culture Make Us Similar and Different? New York State Social 3.5: Communities share cultural similarities and differences across the world. Studies Framework Gathering, Using, and Interpreting Evidence Chronological Reasoning and Causation Key Idea & Practices Comparison and Contextualization Geographic Reasoning Civic Participation Staging the Question Discuss the concept of “culture,” by brainstorming responses to the question, “what does culture look like?” Supporting Question 1 Supporting Question 2 Supporting Question 3 Research Understand Understand Assess What is culture? How does history impact cultures How are the lives of children similar around the world today? and different in global communities? Formative Formative Formative Performance Task Performance Task Performance Task List key details from text and Identify examples of historical Write a paragraph that compares and illustrations to answer the supporting influences on present-day cultures contrasts aspects of daily life for kids in question. around the world on a three-column several world communities. chart. Featured Source Featured Sources Featured Source Source A: “Discovering Culture” Source A: “Brazil Today—Carnaval! The Source A: Day in the Life Celebration of Brazil” Source B: Excerpts from Exploring Countries: France Source C: “The Ancient Art of Rangoli” Summative ARGUMENT How does our culture make us similar and different? Construct an argument supported with Performance evidence that addresses the compelling question.
    [Show full text]
  • MODULE 1. Unit 2. INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCE and SENSITIVITY to DIVERSITY Additional Information
    Training packages for health professionals to improve access and quality of health services for migrants and ethnic minorities, including the Roma MEM‐TP MODULE 1. Unit 2. INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCE AND SENSITIVITY TO DIVERSITY Additional Information Prepared by: Ainhoa Rodriguez and Olga Leralta Andalusian School of Public Health © European Union, 2015 For any reproduction of textual and multimedia information which are not under the © of the European Union, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. © Cover Illustrations: Observatorio de la Infancia de Andalucía, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Junta de Andalucía. Migrants & Ethnic Minorities Training Packages Funded by the European Union in the framework of the EU Health Programme (2008‐2013) in the frame of a service contract with the Consumer, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (Chafea) acting under the mandate from the European Commission. The content of this report represents the views of the Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP) and is its sole responsibility; it can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Commission and/or Chafea or any other body in the European Union. The European Commission and/or Chafea do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor do they accept responsibility for any use made by third parties thereof. 1 September, 2015 MEM‐TP Module 1, Unit 2: Additional Information 1. Multiculturalism, Interculturalism, Intercultural Dialogue, Cultural Competence, Intercultural Competence, Difference Sensitivity and Diversity Sensitivity: Concepts A broad theoretical discussion1,2,3,4,5 related to “multiculturalism” and “interculturalism” is ongoing. Some authors6,7 conceive both concepts as differentiated.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahranian Ngos Shadow Report to CEDAW
    Bahraini NGOs shadow Report to CEDAW 2014 1 Index Page INTRODUCTION 5 METHODOLOGY 5 Executive Summary 6 PRIORITY ISSUES FOR BAHRAINIAN WOMEN 11 Rights and freedoms 11 1-1 Institutional Violence 11 1-2 Legislation 14 Women and political Participation 15 2-1 Women Political participation 15 2-2 Women and decision making 18 Personal affairs 19 3-1 Family law (Ghafareysection) 20 3-2 Family law 36/2009 (section one) 20 3-2-1 Age of marriage 21 3-2-2 Guardianship 21 3-2-3 Polygamy 22 3-2-4 Maternal house and “obedience house” 22 3-2-5 Divorce/divorce without informing \g the wife 23 3-2-6Arbitrary divorce with no compensation to divorcee 23 Violence 25 4-1 Domestic violence 25 Work 27 5-1 Non implementation of labor law 27 5-2 Discrimination in employment 28 5-3 Women workers in the trade unions 29 2 5-4 Domestic workers 29 5-6 Workers in nurseries 30 5-7 Wife work 31 Trafficking in women 31 Nationality 38 Stereotype gender roles 40 Reservations 42 Implementation and dissemination of CEDAW 43 REFERENCES 44 ANNEXES Page Annex one: Women testimonies on institutional violence Fatima Abou Edris Naziha Saeed Aqila El Maqabi Annex two: list of fired female workers 53 – 70 Annex three: Report of the Migrant Workers Protection Association 71 - 75 Annex four: Statistics on Protection from human trafficking (Arabs) 76 - 77 Annex five: Statistics on Protection from human trafficking (foreigners) 78 -85 3 Tables Page Table 1 Number and 5 of women candidates/elected to the Council of Representatives and local councils 17 (2002 -2006 – 2010, 2011 complementary
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Rights in the Middle East and North Africa
    HARD-WON PROGRESS AND A LONG ROAD AHEAD: WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA by Sanja Kelly As the governments of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) under- take the diffi cult process of enacting social and political change, the unequal status of women presents a particularly formidable challenge. In Iraq, deliberations over women’s legal status have been as contentious as negotiations over how to structure the government. In Jordan, measures to increase penalties for so-called honor crimes faced strong resistance by ultraconservative parliamentarians and ordinary citizens who believe that tradition and religion afford them the right to severely punish and even murder female relatives for behavior they deem immoral. These debates are not just legal and philosophical struggles among elites. They are emo- tionally charged political battles that touch upon fundamental notions of morality and social order. In order to provide a detailed look at the conditions faced by women in the Middle East and understand the complex environment surrounding efforts to improve their status, Freedom House conducted a comprehen- sive study of women’s rights in the region. The fi rst edition of this project was published in 2005. The present edition offers an updated examination of the issue, with a special focus on changes that have occurred over the last fi ve years. Although the study indicates that a substantial defi cit in women’s rights persists in every country in the MENA region, the fi ndings also include notable progress, particularly in terms of economic opportu- nities, educational attainment, and political participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and 2 Social Structures
    Unit Culture and 2 Social Structures 68 Chapter 3 Culture Chapter 4 Socialization Chapter 5 Social Structure and Society Chapter 6 Groups and Formal Organizations Chapter 7 Deviance and Social Control 69 Chapter 3 Culture Sections 1. The Basis of Culture 2. Language and Culture 3. Norms and Values 4. Beliefs and Material Culture 5. Cultural Diversity and Similarity Learning Objectives After reading this chapter, you will be able to • explain how culture and heredity affect social behavior. • describe how language and culture are related. • name the essential components of culture. • discuss how cultural diversity is promoted within a society. • understand the role of ethnocentrism in society. • identify similarities in cultures around the world. 70 Applying Sociology The crowing rooster wakes Jabu very early. Already her mother has carried a bucket of water from the village tap and put it on the fire to heat. Bread is laid out on a newspaper on the ground, ready to be cut and spread with jam. Meanwhile, Jabu wraps her baby brother in a blanket and ties him on her back, soothing him with a melody as she begins her chores. The goats must be milked and the cattle need to be watered. After her chores, Jabu dresses for the two-mile walk to school. On the way, she stops to greet a village elder who asks about her father who works in the distant diamond mines. By the time she arrives at school, Jabu sees that school assem- bly has already begun. The headmistress decides to set an example of Jabu and calls her up front to slap her hand with a ruler.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Diversity and Information and Communication Impacts on Language Learning
    www.ccsenet.org/ies International Education Studies Vol. 4, No. 2; May 2011 Cultural diversity and information and communication impacts on Language Learning Wang Wen-Cheng Department of Business Management, Hwa Hsia Institute of Technology, Taiwan 111 Gong Jhuan Rd., Chung Ho, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C Tel: 886-289-415-156 E-mail: [email protected] Lin Chien-Hung Department of Business Management, Hwa Hsia Institute of Technology, Taiwan 111 Gong Jhuan Rd., Chung Ho, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C Tel: 886-289-415-022 E-mail: [email protected] Chu Ying-Chien Department of Tourism and Leisure National Penghu University, Taiwan 300 Liu-Ho Rd., Makung city, Penghu, Taiwan, R.O.C Tel: 886-926-4115 E-mail: [email protected] Received: September 10, 2010 Accepted: September 28, 2010 doi:10.5539/ies.v4n2p111 Abstract Cultural diversity doesn’t just entail differences in dress and language. It also encompasses different ways of thinking, managing, and communicating. The relationship between communication and culture is a very complex and intimate one. Cultures are created through communication; that is, communication is the means of human interaction through which cultural characteristics are created and shared. People use language for purposeful communication and learning a new language involves learning how to use words, rules and knowledge about language and its use in order to communicate with speakers of the language. In this paper, the first section attempts to illustrate communications and culture transformation; the second section focuses on the ways in which people’s world-views affect languages’ learning, understanding, and interaction; the third section discusses the diverse cultural stratifications between eastern and western cultures’ values.
    [Show full text]