Multimessenger Astronomy Probes Deep-Space Events with an Arsenal of Lenses Stephen Ornes, Science Writer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Multimessenger Astronomy Probes Deep-Space Events with an Arsenal of Lenses Stephen Ornes, Science Writer CORE CONCEPTS CORE CONCEPTS Multimessenger astronomy probes deep-space events with an arsenal of lenses Stephen Ornes, Science Writer On September 22, 2017, four billion years into its MMA also brings together researchers who ap- journey through space, a ghostly particle hit the ice proach astronomy in different ways, says astrophysicist under Earth’s South Pole. This rare event was picked Teddy Cheung at the Naval Research Laboratory in up by IceCube, the largest neutrino detector on the Washington, DC, who has searched for the sources of planet, triggering a worldwide alert. In response, tele- neutrinos, such as those in the 2017 event, using scopes on the ground and in orbit turned toward the gamma ray data collected by the Fermi orbiting region of the sky that had produced the particle to telescope. “Every type of researcher, including theo- collect other particles and waves coming from the rists, experimentalists, and observers is really excited same source. These diverse tools allowed physicists about talking to each other,” he says. MMA is now to work out where this cosmic messenger came from— helping astronomers test theories about deep space and the answer took everyone by surprise (1). events, make serendipitous discoveries, and test ideas It was a shining example of multimessenger as- about some of the most exotic objects in the universe. tronomy (MMA)—the use of different types of cosmic “messengers” to study deep-space phenomena. Ways of Seeing Those messengers include electromagnetic waves Astronomers have long tried to study the same event (i.e., light, radio, and others), particles (e.g., neutrinos in different ways. For the past few decades, that has and cosmic rays), and the ripples in spacetime called meant observing objects at several wavelengths across gravitational waves. MMA builds on multiwave- the electromagnetic spectrum, from radio waves to length studies, which began in the mid-20th century gamma rays. Radio telescopes measure low-energy and combine observations of different swaths of the emissions from stars, galaxies, and other sources; electromagnetic spectrum. The idea driving MMA is gamma ray telescopes, such as the orbiting Fermi to merge the strengths of individual tools, offering telescope that surveys the entire sky, measure high- a synergistic approach. energy waves. The spectrum in between includes In July 2018, using measurements from Fermi, VERITAS in southern Arizona (pictured), and other telescopes, researchers revealed for the first time the origins of a high-energy neutrino, tracing it to a supermassive black hole at the center of a distant galaxy. Image credit: NSF/VERITAS. Published under the PNAS license. 3354–3357 | PNAS | February 26, 2019 | vol. 116 | no. 9 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1900974116 Downloaded by guest on October 3, 2021 In 2017, the Virgo interferometer near Pisa, Italy, helped identify a gravitational wave produced by the collision of two neutron stars. Researchers were able to combine this gravitational wave data with electromagnetic observations for the first time. Image credit: Wikimedia Commons/The Virgo Collaboration. infrared and ultraviolet radiation, as well as optical MMA investigations use data from at least two of light—the visible glow of a star. these messengers. In recent years, the studies have In recent years, new observatories have been able to taken a big jump, with observations that can verify or add neutrinos and gravitational waves to the list of cos- even challenge existing theory, says Cheung. The mic messengers. Neutrinos are particularly revealing. A 2017 neutrino revealed that blazers can produce the neutrino races through the universe almost unaffected by high-energy particles, despite prevailing theory sug- anymatterorforcesitmeets,soitstrajectorytracesdi- gesting they wouldn’t. MMA observations gave as- rectly back to its origin. For decades, astronomers have tronomers evidence that heavy elements such as gold monitored relatively low-energy neutrinos, mainly from and platinum form when neutron stars collide. Data the Sun, but since IceCube was completed in 2010, they from gravitational waves and electromagnetic radia- have begun to detect much higher energy neutrinos tion rule out some alternative theories of gravity that coming from unknown sources in the cosmos. IceCube is challenge general relativity and at the same time buried in the Antarctic ice and points downward, using provide theorists with new constraints on future the whole of Earth as a shield against other forms models. Recent MMA studies, says Cheung, “have of radiation. demonstrated how the scientific potential that once The most recent arrival is the gravitational wave: a only existed in pen and paper form has actually been disruption in the fabric of space that can travel at the borne out by these observations.” speed of light. When massive objects accelerate vio- lently, they create ripples detectable by observato- Rapid Response ries on Earth. Since 2015, the Laser Interferometer Astronomers are optimistic about MMA’s potential to Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) and Virgo reveal a more complete picture of transient events— detectors have recorded waves from colliding black for example, supernovas or gravitational waves—with holes and colliding neutron stars. (High-energy cosmic signals that fade over time. But capturing those di- rays are the fourth known messenger. These are verse observations only works when the first detection charged particles, mostly protons, traveling near the of the event is rapidly shared with the world so that speed of light. Tracking their source is tricky because other instruments can watch the right spot in the sky. their trajectories can be bent by magnetic fields, but “It’s very important to get the word out,” says as- theory predicts the same events that produce neutri- trophysicist Reshmi Mukherjee, at Barnard College of nos also produce cosmic rays.) Columbia University in New York City. “We don’t want Ornes PNAS | February 26, 2019 | vol. 116 | no. 9 | 3355 Downloaded by guest on October 3, 2021 to lose any time.” Mukherjee works on a ground- University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee. He points to the based array of gamma ray detectors called VERITAS, case of Supernova1987a, which was first seen by as- for Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope tronomers in a mountaintop observatory in Chile. Array System. “They noticed a star that wasn’t there before,” he In the case of the neutrino that arrived in 2017, says. To get confirmation from other telescopes, the rapid communication paid off. IceCube sent out an astronomers had to drive down the mountain. “They alert that prompted other instruments to gather data had to get to a place where a telegram can be sent to in the same swath of sky. VERITAS, for example, ob- notify the rest of the world about a supernova explo- served the location of the neutrino through February sion.” Eventually, astronomers determined that it was 2018. In July 2018, using measurements from Fermi, an exploded star in the Large Magellanic Cloud, and VERITAS, and other telescopes, researchers revealed in the spring of 1987, it shone with the light of 100 the provenance of the neutrino. Its trajectory pointed million suns. directly back to a supermassive black hole at the Brady thinks a lot about how alert systems have center of a distant galaxy (2). Some supermassive shaped MMA studies—mainly because of the one he black holes create energetic jets, and sometimes knows best. On August 17, 2017, the LIGO and Virgo those jets point directly at us. These “blazars” are detectors identified a gravitational wave produced by among the brightest objects in space. The survey the collision of two neutron stars (3, 4). Within sec- confirmed that this particular blazar, TXS 0506+056, onds, LIGO sent out an alert: a text message with a link was producing an unusually high quantity of gamma to a webpage displaying automated data analyses. At rays at the time of the neutrino detection. the time, Brady was walking down a street in Amsterdam. “Suddenly I’m on my phone, looking for a restaurant to sit in, and join a phone call,” he says. “We all hope someday we’re going to get a notification The event made history because scientists could through our system that says: ’Pay attention to me, this combine gravitational wave data with electromagnetic is weird’.“ observations for the first time to untangle what hap- pens when neutron stars merge. “It’s a beautiful, rich, —Patrick Brady messy, and complicated process,” says physicist Peter Shawhan at the University of Maryland, College Park, who studies gravitational waves in LIGO data. Astronomers hypothesize that high-energy neutri- The stars circled each other closer and closer until nos could form when high-energy protons collide with they smashed together into a dense single object, an low-energy photons. Years ago, astronomers sug- event recorded by the LIGO and Virgo detectors as a gested blazars might be good sites for this process, kind of “chirp” that lasted 100 seconds. (For com- but in recent years, that idea had been all but aban- parison, in the black hole collisions seen so far the ’ doned because studies hadn t found a correlation chirp lasts only a fraction of a second.) At the same between the arrival directions of IceCube cosmic time, the collision released high-energy gamma rays. “ neutrinos and known Fermi blazars. It was a surprise The gamma rays arrived at Earth just under 2 seconds ” that blazars showed up, says physicist Francis Halzen after the end of the gravitational wave chirp, sug- at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, principal in- gesting that the spacetime ripples travel at the speed vestigator for IceCube. of light. ’ The researches wondered if they d missed others. Afterward, the event produced a flare of optical And they had: When Halzen and his collaborators and ultraviolet emission called a kilonova, thought to combed through archived IceCube data, they dis- be fueled by the radioactive decay of newly formed covered a burst of more than a dozen neutrinos in late heavy elements, which faded over a matter of days.
Recommended publications
  • Polarimetric Properties of Blazars Caught by the WEBT
    galaxies Review Polarimetric Properties of Blazars Caught by the WEBT Claudia M. Raiteri * and Massimo Villata INAF, Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, via Osservatorio 20, I-10025 Pino Torinese, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Active galactic nuclei come in many varieties. A minority of them are radio-loud, and exhibit two opposite prominent plasma jets extending from the proximity of the supermassive black hole up to megaparsec distances. When one of the relativistic jets is oriented closely to the line of sight, its emission is Doppler beamed and these objects show extreme variability properties at all wavelengths. These are called “blazars”. The unpredictable blazar variability, occurring on a continuous range of time-scales, from minutes to years, is most effectively investigated in a multi-wavelength context. Ground-based and space observations together contribute to give us a comprehensive picture of the blazar emission properties from the radio to the g-ray band. Moreover, in recent years, a lot of effort has been devoted to the observation and analysis of the blazar polarimetric radio and optical behaviour, showing strong variability of both the polarisation degree and angle. The Whole Earth Blazar Telescope (WEBT) Collaboration, involving many tens of astronomers all around the globe, has been monitoring several blazars since 1997. The results of the corresponding data analysis have contributed to the understanding of the blazar phenomenon, particularly stressing the viability of a geometrical interpretation of the blazar variability. We review here the most significant polarimetric results achieved in the WEBT studies. Keywords: active galactic nuclei; blazars; jets; polarimetry Citation: Raiteri, C.M.; Villata, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Waves: First Joint LIGO-Virgo Detection
    PRESS RELEASE I PARIS I 27 SEPTEMBER 2017 Gravitational waves: first joint LIGO-Virgo detection Scientists in the LIGO and Virgo collaborations have achieved the first ever three-detector observation of the gravitational waves emitted by the merger of two black holes. This is the first signal detected by the Advanced Virgo instrument, which joined observing runs by the two LIGO detectors on 1 August, and confirms that it is fully operational. It opens the way to considerably more accurate localization of the sources of gravitational waves. The discovery is published by the international collaboration that runs the three detectors, including teams from the CNRS, in the journal Physical Review Letters. The announcement was made at a press briefing during a meeting of the G7-science1 in Turin, Italy. On the very same day, the CNRS awarded two Gold Medals to physicists Alain Brillet and Thibault Damour for their major contributions to the detection of gravitational waves2. Black holes are the final stage in the evolution of the most massive stars. Some black holes form a pair, orbiting around each other and gradually getting closer while losing energy in the form of gravitational waves, until a point is reached where the process suddenly accelerates. They then end up coalescing into a single black hole. Merging black holes have already been observed three times by the LIGO detectors, in 2015 and early 20173. This time, three instruments detected the event on 14 August 2017 at 10:30 UTC, enabling vastly improved localization in the sky. This new event confirms that pairs of black holes are relatively common, and will contribute towards the study of such objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Advanced Virgo
    EPJ Web of Conferences will be set by the publisher EPJDOI: Web will of beConferences set by the publisher182, 02003 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818202003 ICNFPc Owned 2017 by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017 Status of Advanced Virgo F. Acernese51,17, T. Adams26, K. Agatsuma31, L. Aiello10,16, A. Allocca47,21,,a A. Amato28, S. Antier25, N. Arnaud25,8, S. Ascenzi50,23, P. Astone22, P. Bacon1, M. K. M. Bader31, F. Baldaccini46,20, G. Ballardin8, F. Barone51,17, M. Barsuglia1, D. Barta34, A. Basti47,21, M. Bawaj38,20, M. Bazzan44,18, M. Bejger5, I. Belahcene25, D. Bersanetti15, A. Bertolini31, M. Bitossi8,21, M. A. Bizouard25, S. Bloemen33, M. Boer2, G. Bogaert2, F. Bondu48, R. Bonnand26, B. A. Boom31, V. Boschi8,21, Y. Bouffanais1, A. Bozzi8, C. Bradaschia21, M. Branchesi10,16, T. Briant27, A. Brillet2, V. Brisson25, T. Bulik3, H. J. Bulten36,31, D. Buskulic26, C. Buy1, G. Cagnoli28,42, E. Calloni43,17, M. Canepa39,15, P. Canizares33, E. Capocasa1, F. Carbognani8, J. Casanueva Diaz21, C. Casentini50,23, S. Caudill31, F. Cavalier25, R. Cavalieri8, G. Cella21, P. Cerdá-Durán55, G. Cerretani47,21, E. Cesarini6,23, E. Chassande-Mottin1, A. Chincarini15, A. Chiummo8, N. Christensen2, S. Chua27, G. Ciani44,18, R. Ciolfi13,24, A. Cirone39,15, F. Cleva2, E. Coccia10,16, P.-F. Cohadon27, D. Cohen25, A. Colla49,22, L. Conti18, I. Cordero-Carrión56, S. Cortese8, J.-P. Coulon2, E. Cuoco8, S. D’Antonio23, V. Dattilo8, M. Davier25, C. De Rossi28,8, J. Degallaix28, M. De Laurentis10,17, S. Deléglise27, W. Del Pozzo47,21, R. De Pietri45,19, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Virgo: Status of the Detector, Latest Results and Future Prospects
    universe Review Advanced Virgo: Status of the Detector, Latest Results and Future Prospects Diego Bersanetti 1,* , Barbara Patricelli 2,3 , Ornella Juliana Piccinni 4 , Francesco Piergiovanni 5,6 , Francesco Salemi 7,8 and Valeria Sequino 9,10 1 INFN, Sezione di Genova, I-16146 Genova, Italy 2 European Gravitational Observatory (EGO), Cascina, I-56021 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] 3 INFN, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy 4 INFN, Sezione di Roma, I-00185 Roma, Italy; [email protected] 5 Dipartimento di Scienze Pure e Applicate, Università di Urbino, I-61029 Urbino, Italy; [email protected] 6 INFN, Sezione di Firenze, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy 7 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Trento, Povo, I-38123 Trento, Italy; [email protected] 8 INFN, TIFPA, Povo, I-38123 Trento, Italy 9 Dipartimento di Fisica “E. Pancini”, Università di Napoli “Federico II”, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, I-80126 Napoli, Italy; [email protected] 10 INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, I-80126 Napoli, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Virgo detector, based at the EGO (European Gravitational Observatory) and located in Cascina (Pisa), played a significant role in the development of the gravitational-wave astronomy. From its first scientific run in 2007, the Virgo detector has constantly been upgraded over the years; since 2017, with the Advanced Virgo project, the detector reached a high sensitivity that allowed the detection of several classes of sources and to investigate new physics. This work reports the Citation: Bersanetti, D.; Patricelli, B.; main hardware upgrades of the detector and the main astrophysical results from the latest five years; Piccinni, O.J.; Piergiovanni, F.; future prospects for the Virgo detector are also presented.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hunt for Environmental Noise in Virgo During the Third Observing Run
    galaxies Article The Hunt for Environmental Noise in Virgo during the Third Observing Run Irene Fiori 1 , Federico Paoletti 2 , Maria Concetta Tringali 1,3,* , Kamiel Janssens 4 , Christos Karathanasis 5 , Alexis Menéndez-Vázquez 5 , Alba Romero-Rodríguez 5 , Ryosuke Sugimoto 6, Tatsuki Washimi 7, Valerio Boschi 2 , Antonino Chiummo 1 , Marek Cie´slar 8 , Rosario De Rosa 9,10 , Camilla De Rossi 1, Francesco Di Renzo 2,11 , Ilaria Nardecchia 12,13 , Antonio Pasqualetti 1, Barbara Patricelli 2,11 and Paolo Ruggi 1 and Neha Singh 3 1 European Gravitational Observatory (EGO), Cascina, I-56021 Pisa, Italy; irene.fi[email protected] (I.F.); [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (C.D.R.); [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (P.R.) 2 INFN, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] (F.P.); [email protected] (V.B.); [email protected] (F.D.R.); [email protected] (B.P.) 3 Astronomical Observatory, Warsaw University, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 4 Faculty of Science, Universiteit Antwerpen, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium; [email protected] 5 Institut de Fìsica d’Altes Energies (IFAE), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain; [email protected] (C.K.); [email protected] (A.M.-V.); [email protected] (A.R.-R.) 6 Department of Physics, University of Toyama, Toyama City, Toyama 930-8555, Japan; [email protected] 7 National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ), Mitaka City, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan; [email protected] 8 Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 9 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Napoli Federico II, Complesso Universitario di Monte S.Angelo, I-80126 Napoli, Italy; [email protected] 10 INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Complesso Universitario di Monte S.
    [Show full text]
  • Universit`A Degli Studi Di Pisa
    Universita` degli Studi di Pisa Facolta` di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Naturali PhD Thesis in Applied Physics April 2006 The control of the Virgo interferometer for gravitational wave detection Supervisors: Prof. Francesco Fidecaro Dr. Matteo Barsuglia Author: Lisa Barsotti 1 2 ...e ho scritto nemmeno la met`adi ci`oche ho visto. Marco Polo 3 4 Acknowledgments My ¯rst idea was to use this space to thank one by one all the people who somehow helped me in my 3 years long journey. I realize only now that this would imply to write some other tens of pages, and the dimension of this thesis would become quite embarrassing. So, I need to change strategy. To Francesco, the I.N.F.N Pisa group and the Virgo collaboration, thank you for believing in me and giving me the possibility to present our results to the interna- tional scienti¯c community. To Edwige and all the commissioning group, thanks for the time spent together in control room (e in particolare per le cene a base di pizza e cinque e cinque). To Giovanni, thank you for all your useful suggestions. To Ra®aele, thank you for always being around. To Paolo, thank you for answering to all my daily questions. To Adalberto, thank you for showing me the enthusiasm with which this work should be done. To Maddalena, thanks for your encouragement and all the nice ¯gures you did for me (and all the pictures you took when I was sleeping on my chair..). To Gary and Matt, for your patience with my poor English.
    [Show full text]
  • HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROSCOPY of 14 LOW-REDSHIFT QUASARS1 Rajib Ganguly,2 Michael S
    A The Astronomical Journal, 133:479Y486, 2007 February # 2007. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROSCOPY OF 14 LOW-REDSHIFT QUASARS1 Rajib Ganguly,2 Michael S. Brotherton,2 Nahum Arav,3 Sara R. Heap,4 Lutz Wisotzki,5 Thomas L. Aldcroft,6 Danielle Alloin,7,8 Ehud Behar,9 Gabriela Canalizo,10 D. Michael Crenshaw,11 Martijn de Kool,12 Kenneth Chambers,13 Gerald Cecil,14 Eleni Chatzichristou,15 John Everett,16,17 Jack Gabel,3 C. Martin Gaskell,18 Emmanuel Galliano,19 Richard F. Green,20 Patrick B. Hall,21 Dean C. Hines,22 Vesa T. Junkkarinen,23 Jelle S. Kaastra,24 Mary Elizabeth Kaiser,25 Demosthenes Kazanas,4 Arieh Konigl,26 Kirk T. Korista,27 Gerard A. Kriss,28 Ari Laor,9 Karen M. Leighly,29 Smita Mathur,30 Patrick Ogle,31 Daniel Proga,32 Bassem Sabra,33 Ran Sivron,34 Stephanie Snedden,35 Randal Telfer,36 and Marianne Vestergaard37 Received 2006 June 27; accepted 2006 October 4 ABSTRACT We present low-resolution ultraviolet spectra of 14 low-redshift (zem P 0:8) quasars observed with the Hubble Space Telescope STIS as part of a Snapshot project to understand the relationship between quasar outflows and luminosity. By design, all observations cover the C iv emission line. Ten of the quasars are from the Hamburg-ESO catalog, three are from the Palomar-Green catalog, and one is from the Parkes catalog. The sample contains a few interesting quasars, including two broad absorption line (BAL) quasars (HE 0143À3535 and HE 0436À2614), one quasar with a mini-BAL (HE 1105À0746), and one quasar with associated narrow absorption (HE 0409À5004).
    [Show full text]
  • OJ 287: NEW TESTING GROUND for GENERAL RELATIVITY and BEYOND C Sivaram Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore
    OJ 287: NEW TESTING GROUND FOR GENERAL RELATIVITY AND BEYOND C Sivaram Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore Abstract: The supermassive short period black hole binary OJ287 is discussed as a new precision testing ground for general relativity and alternate gravity theories. Like in the case of binary pulsars, the relativistic gravity effects are considerably larger than in the solar system. For instance the observed orbital precession is forty degrees per period. The gravitational radiation energy losses are comparable to typical blazar electromagnetic radiation emission and it is about ten orders larger than that of the binary pulsar with significant orbit shrinking already apparent in the light curves. This already tests Einstein gravity to a few percent for objects at cosmological distances. Constraints on alternate gravity theories as well as possible detection of long term effects of dark matter and dark energy on this system are described. 1 For more than fifty years after Einstein proposed the general theory of relativity in 1915, observational tests to verify some of the predictions were confined to within the solar system; where the effects are quite small. This situation changed with the discovery of the binary pulsar in 1975 where the relativistic periastron shift was more than four degrees per year, a whopping thirty thousand times more than the paltry well known correction of 43 arc seconds/century for mercury.1, 2 The recently discovered 2.4 hour period binary pulsar has a periastron shift of sixteen degrees per year!3 Other relativistic effects like the time delay of the signals and time dilation and frequency shifts are also much larger for these binary systems.
    [Show full text]
  • National Science Foundation LIGO FACTSHEET NSF and the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory
    e National Science Foundation LIGO FACTSHEET NSF and the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory In 1916, Albert What is LIGO? Einstein published the LIGO consists of two widely separated laser paper that predicted interferometers located within the United States – one gravitational waves – in Hanford, Washington, and the other in Livingston, ripples in the fabric of Louisiana – each housed inside an L-shaped, ultra-high space-time resulting vacuum tunnel. The twin LIGO detectors operate in from the most violent unison to detect gravitational waves. Caltech and MIT phenomena in our led the design, construction and operation of the NSF- universe, from funded facilities. supernovae explosions to the collision of black What are gravitational waves? holes. For 100 years, Gravitational waves are distortions of the space and that prediction has time which emit when any object that possesses mass stimulated scientists accelerates. This can be compared in some ways to how around the world who accelerating charges create electromagnetic fields (e.g. have been seeking light and radio waves) that antennae detect. To generate to directly detect gravitational waves that can be detected by LIGO, the gravitational waves. objects must be highly compact and very massive, such as neutron stars and black holes. Gravitational-wave In the 1970s, the National Science Foundation (NSF) detectors act as a “receiver.” Gravitational waves travel joined this quest and began funding the science to Earth much like ripples travel outward across a pond. and technological innovations behind the Laser However, these ripples in the fabric of space-time carry Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), information about their violent origins and about the the instruments that would ultimately yield a direct nature of gravity – information that cannot be obtained detection of gravitational waves.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Gravitational Waves
    Review A Brief History of Gravitational Waves Jorge L. Cervantes-Cota 1, Salvador Galindo-Uribarri 1 and George F. Smoot 2,3,4,* 1 Department of Physics, National Institute for Nuclear Research, Km 36.5 Carretera Mexico-Toluca, Ocoyoacac, Mexico State C.P.52750, Mexico; [email protected] (J.L.C.-C.); [email protected] (S.G.-U.) 2 Helmut and Ana Pao Sohmen Professor at Large, Institute for Advanced Study, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, 999077 Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. 3 Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, Laboratoire APC-PCCP, Université Paris Diderot, 10 rue Alice Domon et Leonie Duquet 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France. 4 Department of Physics and LBNL, University of California; MS Bldg 50-5505 LBNL, 1 Cyclotron Road Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.:+1-510-486-5505 Abstract: This review describes the discovery of gravitational waves. We recount the journey of predicting and finding those waves, since its beginning in the early twentieth century, their prediction by Einstein in 1916, theoretical and experimental blunders, efforts towards their detection, and finally the subsequent successful discovery. Keywords: gravitational waves; General Relativity; LIGO; Einstein; strong-field gravity; binary black holes 1. Introduction Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, published in November 1915, led to the prediction of the existence of gravitational waves that would be so faint and their interaction with matter so weak that Einstein himself wondered if they could ever be discovered. Even if they were detectable, Einstein also wondered if they would ever be useful enough for use in science.
    [Show full text]
  • Relativistic Astrophysics and Astroparticles
    Relativistic astrophysics and astroparticles Keywords: Relativistic compact stars (white dwarfs, neutron stars, quark stars, etc..) - Black holes at all mass scales – GRBs, Fast Radio Bursts, SN explosions, Novae, and other transient phenomena – Cosmic Rays and astroparticles - Key questions: - Physics of accretion and ejection onto/from compact objects - Reveal and study the effects of GR in the strong field limit - Measure the properties of BHs (mass, spin) and understand how energy is extracted from them - Study the particle acceleration processes at all different scales - Search for electromagnetic counterparts of gravitational waves and of neutrino sources - Use the compact objects and high-energy observations to constrain fundamental laws of nature (e.g. Lorentz Invariance Violation, axion-like particles, dark matter) Probing Black holes and compact objects Black holes (BH) are fully characterized by only three parameters: mass, angular momentum per unit mass (a=J/M) and electric charge. All additional information is lost inside the event horizon, and is therefore not accessible to external observers. Astrophysical BHs are even simpler, since their charge is expected to be zero in all situations of astrophysical interest. Despite much progress in the search for BHs over the last three decades, it is mainly through the mass argument (i.e. a mass larger than the maximum possible NS mass) that sources have been until recently identified as BHs. With the first detection of gravitational waves (GWs) in September 2015 and the identification of their source as a merger of two ~30 Msun black holes, stellar-mass BH existence has been finally proved. Although this unavoidably implies that also even horizons must exist, direct evidence of the latter is still missing.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Waves: Sources, Detectors and Searches
    Gravitational Waves: Sources, Detectors and Searches K. Riles,1 1Physics Department, University of Michigan to appear in Progress in Particle & Nuclear Physics submitted July 1, 2012 revised August 27, 2012 Abstract Gravitational wave science should transform in this decade from a study of what has not been seen to a full-fledged field of astronomy in which detected signals reveal the nature of cataclysmic events and exotic objects. The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration have re- cently completed joint data runs of unprecedented sensitivities to gravitational waves. So far, no gravitational radiation has been seen (although data mining continues). It seems likely that the first detection will come from 2nd-generation LIGO and Virgo interferometers now being installed. These new detectors are expected to detect 40 coalescences of neutron star binary systems per ∼ year at full sensitivity. At the same time, research and development continues on 3rd-generation underground interferometers and on space-based interferometers. In parallel there is a vigorous effort in the radio pulsar community to detect several-nHz gravitational waves via the timing ∼ residuals from an array of pulsars at different locations in the sky. As the dawn of gravitational wave astronomy nears, this review, intended primarily for interested particle and nuclear physi- cists, describes what we have learned to date and the propects for direct discovery of gravitational waves. 1 Introduction Einstein's General Theory of Relativity (hereafter: general relativity) predicts the existence of grav- itational waves, disturbances of space-time itself that propagate at the speed of light and have two transverse quadrupolar polarizations [1].
    [Show full text]