Traffic Engineering Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Traffic Engineering Study Traffic Engineering Study Traffic Impact Study Town Center Area Prepared For: City of Wildwood 16860 Main Street Wildwood, MO 63040 Prepared By: February 2018 Rev. March 16, 2018 HR Green Job No.: 171140 Town Center Traffic Impact Study City of Wildwood Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. ii Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................. 3 Existing Street Network ........................................................................................................... 3 Existing Land Use .................................................................................................................... 7 Existing Traffic Volumes .......................................................................................................... 8 Existing Traffic Operations ..................................................................................................... 12 Intersection Capacity Analysis ....................................................................................... 12 Future Conditions ................................................................................................................... 20 Proposed Land Use ............................................................................................................... 20 Traffic Projections .................................................................................................................. 23 Trip Generation ............................................................................................................. 23 Traffic Distribution and Assignment ............................................................................... 25 Future Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................. 30 Future Traffic Operations ....................................................................................................... 38 Future (No Build) .......................................................................................................... 38 Future Transportation Network .............................................................................................. 42 Future (Build) ................................................................................................................ 42 Alternative Intersection Analysis ............................................................................................ 52 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 56 February 2018 i Town Center Traffic Impact Study City of Wildwood Executive Summary A growing movement, new urbanism, recognizes walkable, human-scaled neighborhoods as the building blocks of sustainable communities and regions. Through grids of streets, transportation choices, and the siting of buildings along sidewalks, new urbanism brings destinations within reach and allows for frequent encounters between citizens, in sharp contrast to sprawl. The excerpt above is referenced from the City of Wildwood’s website to define new urbanism as a philosophy which will be embodied by the Town Center Area. As development opportunities continue within the boundaries of the popular destination known as Town Center in Wildwood, Missouri, planning efforts must include the impacts of future growth and development on the local transportation system. A comprehensive review of the City of Wildwood’s Town Center Area was completed in an effort to estimate the traffic impacts resulting from anticipated development on nearby, connecting roadways. Individual traffic studies have been completed for various, isolated new developments in the Town Center area over the years, and most of them make reference to future growth opportunities in the region. However, now that many developments in the area are completed, City of Wildwood officials have recognized a need to reset and take a comprehensive look at where they are at today, and how future development will impact their existing transportation infrastructure. Based on site reviews and aerial imagery, it is estimated that roughly fifty percent of the total land area which makes up the Town Center Area is built out. So what happens when the remaining parcels are developed? Can twice as much traffic be expected? Can the local streets handle the additional traffic? Will there be a need for new street connections? These questions will be answered as part of this traffic impact study requested by the City of Wildwood. The initial steps in this traffic engineering study process involved the review of peak period traffic counts at significant intersections within Town Center Area, as well as along the primary corridors which provide access to the area, such as Route 100, Route 109 and Manchester Road. In addition, existing Town Center zoning maps, Town Center building code, previously completed traffic impact studies, and discussions with the City’s Public Works and Planning Department staff, were used as resources to gain an understanding of the traffic conditions as they exist today, and what to expect for future development opportunities. The transportation network, as it appears today, is continuing to evolve. The City of Wildwood and MoDOT are currently in the design phase to add capacity to the Route 109 bridge over Route 100, and to upgrade the Route 100 eastbound ramps at Route 109 with a roundabout. The City was also successful in securing MoDOT Cost Share funds to widen Route 109 from the eastbound ramps to new Main Street intersection. Even though these transportation network improvements are imminent, they are not part of the existing system today, and will be February 2018 ii Town Center Traffic Impact Study City of Wildwood referenced in the study as “future conditions”. Existing conditions intersection capacity analysis revealed that almost all of the traffic movements operate at favorable Level-of-Service (LOS) D or better throughout the peak period of a typical weekday, as well as the peak period of a weekend. Some individual movements at Route 109 and Manchester, and Route 100 and Manchester may experience some challenges at LOS E during peak periods. Although traffic can be heavy at times, especially on Route 100 and Route 109, the current street network has the capacity to handle the traffic flow. Future traffic volumes were estimated by reviewing zoned but not built developments, future zoning requirements, land use, densities, and existing traffic capture within the area. Taking into consideration that some of the traffic associated with the new developments will be traffic which is already on the street system (pass-by trips), some of the traffic which will patronize more than one place of business in a single visit (internal trips), and some of traffic will actually come from other modes of transportation (such as walking, jogging, or biking), new vehicle trips were assigned to the local street network during the peak traffic periods throughout the day. It is anticipated the new trips to and from the Town Center Area will be as follows: Morning Peak Evening Peak Saturday Peak 1,177 Inbound 1,257 Inbound 1,574 Inbound 745 Outbound 1,600 Outbound 1,262 Outbound Future traffic projections were determined after the new traffic was assigned to the existing street network based on existing traffic patterns, and local and regional trip origin and destination assumptions. Even without considering the new traffic associated with the Town Center Area, traffic volumes on Route 100 and Route 109 will continue to increase; therefore, it was prudent to review future growth potential in the region and estimate how traffic volumes will increase over a twenty-year planning horizon. Based on the review of historic traffic volumes over the past fifteen years, trendlines indicate an average annual growth rate of 0.5%. This rate was applied to traffic on Route 100 and Route 109 to estimate future traffic projections. The rate was not applied to Manchester Road, however, it is expected that much of the traffic growth on this facility will be directly related to future development associated with the Town Center Area. Projected traffic volumes were used to analyze the future intersection capacity based on two separate scenarios. First, existing (or baseline) traffic volumes were projected out with the growth rate over twenty years as previously discussed. This scenario is referred to as “Future, No Build”. Second, trip generation estimates were assigned to the street network and added to the aforementioned future, no build scenario. This scenario, not surprisingly, is referred to as “Future, Build”. Intersection capacity analysis of the Future, No Build scenario revealed all of the intersections are expected to operate at an overall performance rating of LOS D or better. However, some of February 2018 iii Town Center Traffic Impact Study City of Wildwood the critical movements from the baseline traffic analysis will continue to function at less than desirable LOS E. Many of the movements from the
Recommended publications
  • Ec-2256-Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions
    Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. 1516 E. 26th Place Tulsa, Oklahoma 74114 USA T: (314) 565-8485 www.woodplc.com 22 July 2020 Ms. Judy Dennis, Local Governments Project Manager Ms. Rosana Marshall, Contract Administrator Oklahoma Department of Transportation 200 NE 21st Street Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105-3204 Letter of Interest Pre-Qualification for Environmental Studies Services – Non Federal Projects Contract Identification No. 2256 Dear Ms. Dennis and Ms. Marshall: Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. (Wood) is keenly interested in providing a complete range of environmental services including National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance, natural resource assessment, and coordination and preparation of environmental surveys and associated permits for the Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) County Transportation System. The following information is provided to demonstrate we have the necessary experience with ODOT policies and procedures; capability and experience leading transportation- related NEPA projects; expertise in environmental studies including wetland and stream (Clean Water Act Section 404) permitting, biological studies, cultural resources studies, hazardous waste studies, and all desktop analysis; and the capacity to respond to all projects. We have a long history of successfully providing similar services for departments of transportation throughout the US, Wood has also provided permitting support to ODOT under a contract to provide cultural resource services. We have included Cattails Environmental, LLC and MacArthur Associated Consultants as specialty subconsultants to our team to add local depth and experience. Cattails Environmental—an Oklahoma recognized DBE—brings specialized expertise for wetlands, streams, and endangered species found in Oklahoma. MacArthur Associated Consultants will facilitate all public involvement activities as needed.
    [Show full text]
  • H. R. 3550 [Report No
    IB Union Calendar No. 259 108TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. R. 3550 [Report No. 108–452, Part I] To authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NOVEMBER 20, 2003 Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. PETRI, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. COBLE, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. GILCHREST, Ms. NORTON, Mr. MICA, Mr. NADLER, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. QUINN, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. FILNER, Mr. BACHUS, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mrs. KELLY, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr. BAKER, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. NEY, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. BOS- WELL, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. HAYES, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. SIMMONS, Ms. BERKLEY, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. HONDA, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. REHBERG, Mr. WEINER, Mr. PLATTS, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. HOEFFEL, Mr. KEN- NEDY of Minnesota, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. CHOCOLA, Mr. DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. BEAUPREZ, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. BURNS, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. POR- TER, Mr. MATHESON, and Mr. CARSON of Oklahoma) introduced the fol- lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure MARCH 29, 2004 Reported with an amendment and referred to the Committees on Education and the Workforce, Energy and Commerce, the Judiciary, Resources, and Science, for a period ending not later than March 29, 2004, for consider- ation of such provisions of the bill and amendment as fall within the ju- risdictions of those committees pursuant to clause 1 of rule X 2 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] MARCH 29, 2004 Additional sponsors: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 5–25–10 Vol. 75 No. 100 Tuesday May 25, 2010 Pages 29183–29388
    5–25–10 Tuesday Vol. 75 No. 100 May 25, 2010 Pages 29183–29388 VerDate Mar 15 2010 19:37 May 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\25MYWS.LOC 25MYWS sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with FRONTMATTER II Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 25, 2010 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records PUBLIC Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • ARBY's (GL) 15676 Manchester Rd Ellisville, Missouri (St. Louis MSA)
    NET LEASE INVESTMENT OFFERING ARBY’S (GL) 15676 Manchester Rd Ellisville, Missouri (St. Louis MSA) TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Profile II. Location Overview III. Market & Tenant Overview Executive Summary Photographs Demographic Report Investment Highlights Drone Photographs Market Overview Property Overview Aerial Tenant Overview Site Plan Map NET LEASE INVESTMENT OFFERING DISCLAIMER STATEMENT DISCLAIMER The information contained in the following Offering Memorandum is proprietary and strictly confidential. STATEMENT: It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it from The Boulder Group and should not be made available to any other person or entity without the written consent of The Boulder Group. This Offering Memorandum has been prepared to provide summary, unverified information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. The Boulder Group has not made any investigation, and makes no warranty or representation. The information contained in this Offering Memorandum has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable; however, The Boulder Group has not verified, and will not verify, any of the information contained herein, nor has The Boulder Group conducted any investigation regarding these matters and makes no warranty or representation whatsoever regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information provided. All potential buyers must take appropriate measures to verify all of the information set forth herein. NET LEASE INVESTMENT OFFERING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE The Boulder Group is pleased to exclusively market for sale a newly constructed single tenant Arby’s ground lease SUMMARY: located within Ellisville, Missouri, an affluent suburban community of the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Ellisville Police Department
    ELLISVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT FY 2015 ANNUAL REPORT OF SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 2015 Annual Report Prepared By ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Officials of the City of Ellisville ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Message From the Chief of Police .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Law Enforcement Code of Ethics and Mission Statement .............................................................................................................. 4 Community Overview .................................................................................................................................................................. 5-6 Police Department History ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Police Department Organization ............................................................................................................................................... 8-12 Police Department Organization Chart ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Police Department
    [Show full text]
  • Ellisville Police Department 2013 Annual Report of Police Services
    Ellisville Police Department 2013 Annual Report of Police Services ellisville police department 0 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ 2 City Officials ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Message From the Chief of Police ...................................................................................................... 4 Law Enforcement Code of Ethics ........................................................................................................ 5 Mission Statement .............................................................................................................................. 6 2013 Police Budget ............................................................................................................................. 7 Police Overview .................................................................................................................................. 8 Ellisville Police Organization Chart ..................................................................................................... 9 Police Department Staffing .............................................................................................................. 10 Administrative Office of the Chief of Police ................................................................................ 11-12 Patrol Division
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Ellisville Police Department Excellence, Pride, Dedication 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2018 Annual Report Prepared by the Office of the Chief of Police ..........................................3 Officials of the City of Ellisville .................................................................................................4 A Message From Our Chief .....................................................................................................5 Law Enforcement Code of Ethics .............................................................................................6 Overview..................................................................................................................................7 Ellisville Police Department Personnel .............................................................................. 8-10 Administrative Offices ...................................................................................................... 11-13 Divisions/Units ................................................................................................................. 14-20 Police Department Adopted Budget....................................................................................... 21 Grants .................................................................................................................................... 22 Unexpected Expenditures ...................................................................................................... 22 Quality Service Survey ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H1845
    April 1, 2004 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H1845 Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance Sensenbrenner Stenholm Walsh Messrs. CROWLEY, CAPUANO, of my time, and move the previous Shadegg Sullivan Wamp HOEFFEL, WALSH and PASCRELL Shaw Sweeney Weldon (FL) question on the resolution. Shays Taylor (NC) Weldon (PA) changed their vote from ‘‘nay’’ to The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Sherwood Terry Weller ‘‘yea.’’ question is on ordering the previous Shimkus Thomas Whitfield So the previous question was ordered. Shuster Thornberry question. Wicker The result of the vote was announced Simmons Tiahrt Wilson (NM) Simpson Tiberi as above recorded. The question was taken; and the Wilson (SC) Smith (MI) Toomey A motion to reconsider was laid on Speaker pro tempore announced that Wolf Smith (NJ) Turner (OH) Young (AK) the table. the ayes appeared to have it. Smith (TX) Upton Mr. FROST. Mr. Speaker, I object to Young (FL) Stated against: Souder Vitter Mr. HONDA. Mr. Speaker, on rollcall No. the vote on the ground that the Stearns Walden (OR) 105, had I been present, I would have voted quorum is not present and make a NAYS—194 ‘‘nay.’’ point of order that a quorum is not Abercrombie Grijalva Oberstar The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. present. Ackerman Harman Obey LAHOOD). The question is on the resolu- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Evi- Alexander Hastings (FL) Olver tion. dently a quorum is not present. Allen Hill Ortiz The resolution was agreed to. The Sergeant at Arms will notify ab- Baca Hinchey Owens Baird Hinojosa Pallone A motion to reconsider was laid on sent Members.
    [Show full text]