Appendix 4.3C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix 4.3C REGIONAL CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT – PHASE II PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT – WATER REGIME – APPENDIX 4.3C APPENDIX 4.3C: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE HYDRAULIC IMPACTS OF THE CHURCHILL RIVER DIVERSION ON THE RAT AND BURNTWOOD RIVERS ____ ANASSESSMENT OF THE HYDRAULIC IMPACTS Of THE CHURCHILL RIVER DIVERSION ON THE RA TAND BURNTWOOD RIVERS WaterResources EngineerIng PowerPlanning DivisIon PREPARED BY J. CRAwFORD, RENG. \Ak(Rk---’ CHECKED BY J. MALENCHAK, PH.D. P.ENG. J. WEsTMAc0TT, M.Sc. P. CHANEL, M.Sc. PENG. / P. RASMUSSEN, PH.D. P.ENG. ? CONSULTANT APPRovED BY E,TEKLEMARIAM, M.Sc. RENG. NOTED BY T.MILES, M.Sc. RENG. — i)iC DATE: NOVEMBER 6,2015 REPORT: PPD-1 5/10 1kManitoba Hydro 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. The following is a report on simulated water levels and river flows for the Rat and Burntwood Rivers without the Churchill River Diversion. Simulated water levels and river flows are required to estimate the hydraulic impacts of the Churchill River Diversion for Regional Cumulative Effects Assessment and for other purposes including for operations and resource planning. 2. A hydraulic model was developed to simulate hydraulic conditions on the Rat and Burntwood River systems without the Churchill River Diversion. Model results were then compared against actual measured values to quantify the impacts of the Churchill River Diversion and verify the model was working correctly. Overall model performance results were good which confirmed the model is representative of conditions without the Churchill River Diversion. The following conclusion can be made from the model results: The Churchill River Diversion has impacted the Rat and Burntwood River systems. The average flow on the Rat River at the site of the Notigi Control Structure has increased from 23 cms without the Churchill River Diversion to 790 cms with the Churchill River Diversion for the period from January 1, 1978 to December 31, 2014. Prior to the Churchill River Diversion river flows followed a typical seasonal pattern with generally higher flows in the summer and lower in the winter. The Churchill River Diversion has changed the water regime of the Rat River by changing the quantity of flow, the seasonal timing of flow and the magnitude of flow fluctuations as outflows from Notigi are now set to meet the power requirements of the Manitoba Hydro system. 3 The first impacts of the Churchill River Diversion on the Rat and Burntwood River Systems occurred on May 8, 1974 when the Rat River at Notigi was closed by cofferdam to allow for the construction of Notigi Control Structure. All river flows upstream of the cofferdam were closed off for a period of approximately 19 months which resulted in near zero flow and extremely low water levels downstream. The first diversion water began flowing from the Churchill River basin to the Rat River basin on June 2, 1976 when the rock plug at South Bay Channel was removed. Operation of Notigi Control Structure first began on September 1, 1976 when the flow was increased from near 0 cms to 200 cms over a 3 day period. The initial operation of Notigi was limited during the first winter of 1976/77 to 311 cms so as to not exceed maximum state of nature water levels downstream. Notigi outflows were subsequently increased to the Licence maximum of 850 cms in a series of steps beginning on May 13, 1977 and ending on August 20, 1977. The Churchill River Diversion has had an impact on water levels along the Burntwood River. The average water levels of Wapisu, Threepoint/Footprint, Wuskwatim, Opegano and Birchtree Lakes for the period from January 1, 1978 to December 31, 2014 have risen by 5.7 metres, 4.8 metres, 3.1 metres, 2.3 metres and 5.6 metres respectively due to the diversion of water from the Churchill River Basin. The Churchill River Diversion has also changed the seasonal timing of water levels and increased the magnitude of water level fluctuations. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………… 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ………………………………………………………... 5 INTRODUCTION …………………………………….............…………………. 7 HYDROLOGY ………………………………………………………………….. 8 STUDY METHOD …………………………………………………….……….. 9 MODEL VERIFICATION ……………………….........……………….……….. 13 RESULTS……………………….........……………….………............................. 15 CONCLUSIONS……………………….........……………............….……….. 24 REFERENCES………………...............……….........……………….……….. 27 APPENDICES APPENDIX A –MAPS ……………………………………………………. ......... 29 APPENDIX B – RESULTS ………………………….....……………..…….…… 31 APPENDIX C – RATING CURVES……….......................................................... 37 APPENDIX D – MODEL VERIFICATION ...................……………………...... 50 5 6 INTRODUCTION The following is a report on simulated water levels and river flows for the Rat and Burntwood River systems without the Churchill River Diversion. Simulated water levels and river flows are required to estimate the hydraulic impacts of the Churchill River Diversion for Regional Cumulative Effects Assessment and for other purposes including for operations and resource planning. The Churchill River Diversion has changed the river flow and water level regimes for Rat and Burntwood Rivers. Construction of the Churchill River Diversion began in 1972 and was completed in 1976. The project included the construction of control structures at Missi and Notigi and the excavation of a diversion channel from the South Bay of Southern Indian Lake to Isset Lake and the diversion of water into the Nelson River system via the Rat and Burntwood Rivers. The operation of the Churchill River Diversion influences the water regime of Southern Indian Lake, the Lower Churchill River, the Rat and Burntwood Rivers and the Nelson River. However for the purposes of this report, only the Rat and Burntwood Rivers has been analyzed. Similar analysis for the Churchill and Nelson Rivers is available in separate reports entitled “An Assessment of the Hydraulic Impacts of the Churchill River Diversion on the Upper and Lower Churchill Rivers” 1, and “An Assessment of the Hydraulic Impacts of the Lake Winnipeg Regulation and the Churchill River Diversion on the Nelson River” 2. In this study, a lake routing and water balance spreadsheet model was developed to simulate conditions without the Churchill River Diversion. The simulated results from this model were then compared against historic observations for select periods to assess the hydraulic impacts of the Churchill River Diversion on the Rat and Burntwood Rivers. 7 A study period from 1956 to 2014 was selected because of data availability and the relatively long time period permits maximum flexibility of data usage for Regional Cumulative Effects Assessment and other purposes. Prior to 1956, there is virtually no hydrometric data available for the Rat and Burntwood Rivers. Model results can be used to assess trends and patterns and overall hydraulic characteristics but caution should be exercised when comparing precise day to day results because the model does not explicitly capture localized events such as heavy rain or wind nor does it simulate day to day variations in winter ice conditions that occur. HYDROLOGY The Churchill River originates in northern Alberta and ends at the Hudson Bay near the town of Churchill. The Churchill River has a drainage area of approximately 300,000 square kilometers. The largest lake in the basin, Reindeer Lake, is regulated by Saskpower for power production at Island Falls Generating Station. Prior to the Churchill River Diversion, river flows exited Southern Indian Lake at Missi Falls through two natural outlets at the east end of the lake and flowed down the Lower Churchill River into the Hudson Bay. With the Churchill River Diversion in place approximately 83% of the potential outflow at Missi Falls is diverted down the Rat and Burntwood Rivers for power production purposes on the Lower Nelson River. See map Figures A1 and A2 in Appendix A. Typically, diversion outflows at Notigi Control Structure are set to maximize hydro electric power production from the Kettle, Long Spruce and Limestone Generating Stations. Missi outflows are minimized except when the Churchill and/or Nelson River are in flood and there is water surplus to the needs of the power system. 8 STUDY METHOD In this study, a lake routing and water balance spreadsheet model was developed to simulate hydraulic conditions on the Burntwood River without the Churchill River Diversion. Key features of the model are: it is Excel spreadsheet based; it uses a daily time step and it covers a timeframe from June 25, 1956 to December 31, 2014. This start date was chosen because it coincides with the in service date of the Water Survey of Canada streamflow station on the Burntwood River at Thompson (06TG001) which is the major flow measurement location on the Burntwood River. A hydraulic schematic of the model is shown in Figure 1 below. The model simulates the hydraulic conditions on the Rat and Burntwood Rivers between the site of the Notigi Control Structure and Split Lake. Natural river flows without the Churchill River Diversion are routed past the site of the Notigi Control Structure through Wapisu, Threepoint, Wuskwatim, Opegano, and Birchtree Lakes then past the City of Thompson and to the confluence where the Burntwood River meets Split Lake. Local tributary flow was added along the way to preserve the water balance and maintain hydraulic integrity. Note that this model uses a lake level routing procedure which does not consider channel routing effects or the hydraulic routing of flood waves. A further improvement to
Recommended publications
  • Power from the Nelson
    the The plan to develop abundant, clean, self-renewing energy from Manitoba's own great river. MANITOBA HYDRO LONG SPRUCE KETTLE KE LS EY JENPEG MANITOBA'S WATER POWER ln terms of hVdro-electric po' tential, l\lanitoba's greatest water power resources are the Nelson, Churchill. Winn ipeg, and Saskat' chewan River, in that order. The Winnipeg River's 560,000 kilowatts was developed firsr be' cause of its prox im ity to the pro' GRAND RAPIDS vincial population centre. Next came the Saskatchewan and a 472,OOO kW station at Grand Rapids. Now the mighty Nelson and Churchill Rivers are being har- nessed. Together. the Nelson and Churchill can provide a total of a,270,OOO kW of self-renewing hydro power. I DEVE LOPED HYDRO SITE POTENTIAL HY DRO SIIE - The Electrical Province ln a world belatedly becoming aware that fuels such as oil, coal, and natural gas will one day be completely gone, the value of water power is appreciated more and more. Water power is self renewing. When the last ounce of mineral wealth is wrested from the ground, our water resources will be intact and worth more than ever. Manitobans have been enjoying the benefits of low-cost electricity generated from water power since the first all-weather hydro staiion was built on the Winnipeg River system in 1906. The Winnipeg River, only B0 miles away from the major population centre of Winnipeg, served the province's hydraulic generation needs for the next ha lf century. By 1955, with six hydro plants in service along its course,the Winnipeg River was fully developed (560,000 kilowatts) and power planners looked to the more northerly Saskatchewan River for more low cost power.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Area Planning in the Nelson-Churchill River Basin (NCRB): Laying a Foundation in Northern Manitoba
    Large Area Planning in the Nelson-Churchill River Basin (NCRB): Laying a foundation in northern Manitoba Karla Zubrycki Dimple Roy Hisham Osman Kimberly Lewtas Geoffrey Gunn Richard Grosshans © 2014 The International Institute for Sustainable Development © 2016 International Institute for Sustainable Development | IISD.org November 2016 Large Area Planning in the Nelson-Churchill River Basin (NCRB): Laying a foundation in northern Manitoba © 2016 International Institute for Sustainable Development Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development International Institute for Sustainable Development The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is one Head Office of the world’s leading centres of research and innovation. The Institute provides practical solutions to the growing challenges and opportunities of 111 Lombard Avenue, Suite 325 integrating environmental and social priorities with economic development. Winnipeg, Manitoba We report on international negotiations and share knowledge gained Canada R3B 0T4 through collaborative projects, resulting in more rigorous research, stronger global networks, and better engagement among researchers, citizens, Tel: +1 (204) 958-7700 businesses and policy-makers. Website: www.iisd.org Twitter: @IISD_news IISD is registered as a charitable organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. IISD receives core operating support from the Government of Canada, provided through the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and from the Province
    [Show full text]
  • Document Control
    ~ ~ ""!1 fl ,_, "-""! ~ r'"' G""' o·~~ Ht1='\\l~~~~-t=-~, :~i~:.; Susitna Joint Venture Document Number 87;;.._____ _ PJeaso Return To DOCUMENT CONTROL The Destruction of ~·1anito1)il: ..,; Last Great Riv~.:r by: R. Xewbury & G. ~alaher '···"·· i: . .• ., tts;.,__... m ·ir'Cr a· •z ... NOTICE: This M~t~ri~ may be protected by copyright iaw (TitJa 17 U.S. Code)~ The Destruction of .I! i: i ~ -1 f Manitoba's Last·Great River .': ! ..I _i by R. NEWBURY and G. W. MALAHER ... water is an integral part aj the land, responsible to a large extent for its physical form and the life found in or near it - including man. The land and water are indivisible, and those who would treat a river as so much plumbing to be manipulated, and its water as a commodity to be bought and sold like carloads of wheat, have simply not comprehended this fundamental fact. Richard C. Backing -• I' Two great rivers, the Nelson and the Churchill, cut com­ in midsummer when normal high water would overtop the I I pletely through the Precambrian Shield of northern Mani­ proposed Missi Falls dam. The stopped-up waters of thf I' I! toba bringing water from the interior of Canada to Hudson Churchili would head southward through Notigi and Spli1 i ' l' Bay. \Vaters flowing to the Nelson begin their journey on Lakes toward the Nelson River some 200 miles to the south : the eastern slope of the Rockies, crossing the three Prairie The reservoir would raise lake levels from ten feet or ._,. J i' Provinces via the Saskatchewan River.
    [Show full text]
  • MANITOBA HYDRO-ELECTRIC BOARD, (Hereinafter Called “Hydro”)
    AGREEMENT IN PRINCIPLE BETWEEN: NISICHAWAYASIHK CREE NATION, (hereinafter called “NCN”) OF THE FIRST PART, - and - THE MANITOBA HYDRO-ELECTRIC BOARD, (hereinafter called “Hydro”) OF THE SECOND PART. WHEREAS: 1. NCN is a Cree Nation which carried on, and continues to carry on, activities within its traditional and Treaty 5 areas. NCN’s vision statement is: “To exercise sovereignty that sustains a prosperous socio-economic future for the Nisichawayasihk Cree Nation”. 2. There are about 4,500 Members, approximately 2,300 of whom live on Reserve Lands located at Nelson House, upstream of Taskinigup Falls and Wuskwatim Lake and downstream of the Notigi Control Structure. 3. Neither the AIP nor any other arrangements entered into between the Parties will alter or amend treaty or aboriginal rights recognized and affirmed by s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, including any inherent rights of self government of NCN and its Members. 4. Hydro is a Crown Corporation that was established in 1949, and which is continued by The Manitoba Hydro Act, RSM 1987, c. H190, as amended from time to time, for the purposes of providing a continuing supply of power adequate for the needs of the Province of Manitoba; providing and marketing products, services and expertise related to the development, generation, transmission, distribution, supply and end-use of power within and outside of the Province; and marketing and supplying power to persons and other entities outside the Province. -5- 5. In the late 1960's Manitoba and Canada determined that it would be in the Provincial and National interest to expand the planning and development of hydro-electric generating facilities in northern Manitoba.
    [Show full text]
  • Manitoba's Last ·Great River By
    -- t . FEDERAL 'ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20416 ·' ,' OGC Project No. 7114 Alaska Power Authority Jane Drennan, Esquire Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro Suite 900 1050 Seventeenth Street, N.Wv Wash1nQton, D.C. 20036 Dear Ms. Drennanz Please provide Staff with the following information by D~cember 5, 1983: 1) Raw data (disch~rge vs. percent exceedance Yalues) used to plot the flow duration curves in Exhibit E. These curves, for the Cantwell, Gold Creek, Sunshine, an~ Susitna Station gaQing stations, were found in • Chapter 2, Exhibit E~ 2) Sediment transport and bedload data collected by the USGS in CY 1982. , 3) A complete copy of the December 1981 R&M report entitled "Hydrology, Lower Susitna StudiesM. 4) Copies of the reports ~ntitled, •Alaska Department of Fish and Game Sueitna Hydro studies Final Data Report~ and Synopsisa. These reports include 1982 and 1983 5tudies. 5) A copy of the Braalay Lake Instream Flu~ Assessment being prepared by Jean Baldrige for Woodward-Clyde and th~ APA. 6) Preliminary result~ of the habitat preference criteria etudy now in progress. 7) Results of any new HEC-2 calibration studies, and the data input, to upgrade water aurf&ee elevation predictions in the main channel, including new channel cross sections, and water •urface elevations. ~ •..' ' Documentation for the SNTEMP lftodel that haa been ". proposed by AEIDC t.o simula.te downstream vater t•mper&ture regimes. r 'i '· ' . ' ------- .•·" -2- 9) A complete copy of Table 6.10 from Volume 2 of the Chakachamna Hydroelectric Project Inte~im Feasibility Assessment Report, March 1983. 10) A report on nitrocen supersaturation due to temperature differences at the Cultus Lake facility in British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Building New Relations: Nisichawayasihk Cree Nation, Manitoba Hydro, and the Proposed Wuskwøtím Project
    Building New Relations: Nisichawayasihk Cree Nation, Manitoba Hydro, and the Proposed Wuskwøtím Project By David A. Hultin A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the desree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Native Studies University of Manitoba March 2005 O by David A. Hultin 2005 THE T]NTVERSITY OF MANITOBA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES &++++ COPYRIGHT PERMISSION Building New Relstions: Nisicltøwayasìhk Cree Nation, Manitoba Hydro' and The Proposed ll/uskwatim Project BY David A. Hultin A ThesisÆracticum submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirement of the degree Master Of Arts David A. Hultin O 2005 Permission has been granted to the Library of the University of Manitoba to lend or sell copies of this thesis/practicum, to the National Library of Canada to microfilm this thesis and to lend or sell copies of the film, and to Universify Microfilms Inc. to publish an abstract of this thesis/practicum. This reproduction or copy of this thesis has been made available by authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research, and may only be reproduced and copied as permitted by copyright laws or with express written authorization from the copyright owner. iii Abstract A new relationship is being forged between Nisichawayasihk Cree Nation (NCN) (Nelson House) and Manitoba Hydro for the proposed Wuskwatim hydroelectric generating station that will be located within the Nelson House Resource Management Area. The purpose of this research was to inform the reader about the history of NCN and what role it played in the future development, to determine why NCN members developed from impacted people to potential partners in development and to examine their role in the proposed new hydro project.
    [Show full text]
  • Wuskwatim Hydroelectric Facility
    Université d’Ottawa | University of Ottawa Canada West Foundation A Matter of Wuskwatim Hydroelectric TRUST Facility THE ROLE OF COMMUNITIES Case Study Nisichawayasihk Cree Nation IN ENERGY DECISION-MAKING Manitoba SHAFAK SAJID NOVEMBER 2016 canada west foundation 2016 patrons & university of ottawa Centre for Natural Resources Policy We would like to thank those who agreed to be Arthur J.E. Child Foundation Endowment interviewed for this study. Their insights and Fund at the Calgary Foundation contributions were invaluable in preparing this report. Enbridge Inc. Government of Alberta, Ministry of Culture and Tourism As is customary, any errors of fact or interpretation Government of Manitoba remain the sole responsibility of the authors. Government of Saskatchewan, Crown Investments Corporation of Saskatchewan Copies of the A Matter of Trust: The role of comminities Government of Saskatchewan, Ministry of the Economy in energy decision-making report and the six case studies are available for download on the Canada West Imperial Oil Limited Foundation and Positive Energy websites. Max Bell Foundation N. Murray Edwards/Canadian Natural Resources Limited Richardson Foundation Ron Mannix/Coril Holdings Ltd. positive energy’s Financial Supporters Alberta Energy Canadian Energy Alberta Energy Regulator Pipeline Association BC Oil and Gas Canadian Gas Association Commission Cenovus Canadian Association Encana of Petroleum Producers Natural Resources Canada © Canada West Foundation and University of Ottawa 2016 Canadian Electricity ISBN 978-1-927488-39-3 Association Canada West Foundation is a registered Canadian charitable organization incorporated under federal charter. Nanos Research is our official pollster and our national (#11882 8698 RR 0001) media partner is The Globe and Mail.
    [Show full text]
  • Surfacewatergrassburntwood1.Pdf
    ii.’—. — • n C-) n C C 5 REPORT ON g PROPOSAL FOR THE CLASIFICATION OF MANITOBA’ S SURFACE WATER CRASS-BURNTWOOD RIVERS PRINC IPAL WATERSHED DIV ISION THE CLEAN ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION JUNE 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHPPTER 1 Recommendations 2 CHAPTER 2 Observations and Conclusions 4 CHAPTER 3 Introduction 6 CHAPTER 4 Conduct of’ Hearings 10 CHPPTER 5 The Proposal 12 CHPPTER 6 Review of Evidence Received 16 CHPPTER 7 Churchill River Diversion Project 42 CHAPTER 8 The Nondegradation Concept 48 APPENDIX A Letter from the Chairman which accompanied the proposal document 54 APPENDIX B Newspaper Advertisement of public hearings 58 APPENDIX C List of Exhibits 62 APPENDIX D Proposed Classification of Manitoba’s Surface Water Grass—Burntwcod Rivers Principal Watershed Division 66 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Photographs in this report were provided by courtesy of Manitoba Government Information Services. The maps in Figures 1 and 2 were prepared for The Clear Environment Commission by the Surveys and Mapping Branch of the Department of Natural Resources. The historical canoe route map is reproduced with the kind permission of the Manitoba Historical Society from their “Historical Atlas of Manitoba”, 1970. (i) H ISTORICAL CANOE ROUTES ON THE GRASS 13 AND BURNT WOOD RI VERS from a “Map Exhibiting the New Discoveries in the Interior Parts of North America” printed in london in 1795 by A.Arrowsmith t b’ S -ti-_n-. 4.t4..4’ IL.. $ub Ho. Ii I A N S I. STONY. LNPI.%t4 a CHAPTER 1 RE CC! MEN DATIONS It is recommended that the system of stream classifications, contained in the proposal document attached as Appendix “D’ to this report, be adopted with the exception of those waters affected by the Churchill River Diversion.
    [Show full text]
  • Permafrost Investigations at Thompson, Manitoba: Terrain Studies Johnston, G
    NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRC Permafrost investigations at Thompson, Manitoba: terrain studies Johnston, G. H.; Brown, R. J. E.; Pickersgill, D. N. For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous. Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur: https://doi.org/10.4224/20375716 Technical Paper (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building Research), 1963-10 NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC : https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=b2107435-7cd0-428d-b6b9-047d5de227a5 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=b2107435-7cd0-428d-b6b9-047d5de227a5 Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB. Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at [email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information. Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Building New Relations: Nisichawayasihk Cree Nation, Manitoba Hydro, and the Proposed Wuskwøtím Project
    Building New Relations: Nisichawayasihk Cree Nation, Manitoba Hydro, and the Proposed Wuskwøtím Project By David A. Hultin A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the desree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Native Studies University of Manitoba March 2005 O by David A. Hultin 2005 THE T]NTVERSITY OF MANITOBA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES &++++ COPYRIGHT PERMISSION Building New Relstions: Nisicltøwayasìhk Cree Nation, Manitoba Hydro' and The Proposed ll/uskwatim Project BY David A. Hultin A ThesisÆracticum submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirement of the degree Master Of Arts David A. Hultin O 2005 Permission has been granted to the Library of the University of Manitoba to lend or sell copies of this thesis/practicum, to the National Library of Canada to microfilm this thesis and to lend or sell copies of the film, and to Universify Microfilms Inc. to publish an abstract of this thesis/practicum. This reproduction or copy of this thesis has been made available by authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research, and may only be reproduced and copied as permitted by copyright laws or with express written authorization from the copyright owner. iii Abstract A new relationship is being forged between Nisichawayasihk Cree Nation (NCN) (Nelson House) and Manitoba Hydro for the proposed Wuskwatim hydroelectric generating station that will be located within the Nelson House Resource Management Area. The purpose of this research was to inform the reader about the history of NCN and what role it played in the future development, to determine why NCN members developed from impacted people to potential partners in development and to examine their role in the proposed new hydro project.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission from Tataskweyak Cree Nation to Manitoba Clean Environment Commission Public Hearing on the Bipole III Transmission P
    TATASKWEYAK CREE NATION Submission by Tataskweyak Cree Nation (TCN) to the Manitoba Clean Environment Commission Public Hearing on the Bipole III Transmission Project OUTLINE September 17, 2012 I. Outline of Topics and Issues to be Addressed A. TCN’s Expression of the Cree World View and Hydro Development Issues • TCN’s Mother Earth Model and the Interrelatedness of all Things; • Assessment of Stresses on the TCN Homeland Ecosystem Caused by Hydro Development using TCN’s Mother Earth Model; and • Achieving Harmony and Balance in the TCN Homeland Ecosystem. B. The History and Extent of Hydro Development in the TCN Resource Area Issues • Lands and waters affected or occupied in the TCN Resource Area for Hydro Development; and • Attendant Impacts. C. The Disturbance within the TCN Resource Area Caused by the Bipole III Transmission Project Issues • The Nature and Extent of the Bipole III Transmission Project in the Split Lake Resource Area; and • Attendant Impacts. D. Negotiations with Manitoba Hydro to Address Attendant Impacts of the Bipole III Transmission Project on TCN Issues • Overview of Bilateral TCN - Hydro Process to Address Attendant Impacts of Bipole III; 1 | Page o Relationship of the TCN – Hydro Process to the Crown’s Duties Arising Under s. 35 of the Constitution Act (1982) o Relationship of the TCN – Hydro Process to Past Agreements Made between TCN and Hydro, particularly the: − 1977 Northern Flood Agreement [NFA] and; − 1992 Agreement as presented by legal counsel in a memo to be prepared and submitted seven (7) days in advance of the TCN submission • The Current Status of the TCN – Hydro Process; and • TCN Conditions for Support of the Bipole III Transmission Project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manitoba Research Alliance on CED in the New Economy
    Hydro Partnerships and CED/1 New Partnerships in Hydro Development Submitted to: The Manitoba Research Alliance on CED in the New Economy David Hultin November 22, 2004 Hydro Partnerships and CED/2 Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincere appreciation to the Manitoba Research Alliance on CED in the New Economy for the very generous funding to do this research. Special thanks to Prof. John Loxley of the Department of Economics at the University of Manitoba. I originally showed up at his door acting on a tip that he might have a summer job for me; little did I know where it would take me. A huge thank-you as well to Lynne Fernandez and the other members of the Student Colloquium on Community Economic Development organizing committee for inviting me to participate in their conference, and giving me some feedback on my efforts. Along the way, I have been very fortunate to meet many of the individuals involved with the MRA. It was a pleasure to make their acquaintances and learn about other important research on CED in the new economy. We are pleased to acknowledge the generous financial support of the Initiative on the New Economy of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; via the Manitoba Research Alliance on Community Economic Development in the New Economy. For further information please see: http://www.manitobaresearchallianceced.ca It was late in the evening, almost one year ago, that I was standing on the side of provincial road 391, north of Thompson, Mb., at the point where Manitoba Hydro and Hydro Partnerships and CED/3 Nisichawayasihk Cree Nation (NCN) would like to put an access road to the site of the proposed Wuskwatim hydroelectric generating station.
    [Show full text]