DOCSLIB.ORG

Analysis of the Likely Environmental Effects of the Development Report 18 November 2020 Confidential

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analysis of the Likely Environmental Effects of the Development Report 18 November 2020 Confidential Sevington Inland Border Facility An Analysis of the Likely Environmental Effects of the Development Report 18 November 2020 Confidential Mott MacDonald mottmac.com Department for Transport Sevington Inland Border Facility An Analysis of the Likely Environmental Effects of the Development Report 18 November 2020 Confidential Mott MacDonald Limited. Registered in England and Wales no. 1243967. Registered office: Mott MacDonald | Confidential | Sevington Inland Border Facility An Analysis of the Likely Environmental Effects of the Development Report Issue and Revision Record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description P01 30/10/20 First draft P02 06/11/20 Final for Article 4 submission P03 18/11/20 Revised for final Article 4 submission Document reference: 419419 | 419419-MMD-XX-SV-RP-YE-0002 | P03 Information class: Secure This Report has been prepared solely for use by the party which commissioned it (the 'Client') in connection with the captioned project. It should not be used for any other purpose. No person other than the Client or any party who has expressly agreed terms of reliance with us (the 'Recipient(s)') may rely on the content, information or any views expressed in the Report. This Report is confidential and contains proprietary intellectual property and we accept no duty of care, responsibility or liability to any other recipient of this Report. No representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied, is made and no responsibility or liability is accepted by us to any party other than the Client or any Recipient(s), as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this Report. For the avoidance of doubt this Report does not in any way purport to include any legal, insurance or financial advice or opinion. We disclaim all and any liability whether arising in tort, contract or otherwise which we might otherwise have to any party other than the Client or the Recipient(s), in respect of this Report, or any information contained in it. We accept no responsibility for any error or omission in the Report which is due to an error or omission in dat a, information or statements supplied to us by other parties including the Client (the 'Data'). We have not independently verified the Data or otherwise examined it to determine the accuracy, completeness, sufficiency for any purpose or feasibility for any particular outcome including financial. Forecasts presented in this document were prepared using the Data and the Report is dependent or based on the Data. Inevitably, some of the assumptions used to develop the forecasts will not be realised and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Consequently, we do not guarantee or warrant the conclusions contained in the Report as there are likely to be differences between the forecasts and the actual results and those differences may be material. While we consider that the information and opinions given in this Report are sound all parties must rely on their own skill and judgement when making use of it. Information and opinions are current only as of the date of the Report and we accept no responsibility for updating such information or opinion. It should, therefore, not be assumed that any such information or opinion continues to be accurate subsequent to the date of the Report. Under no circumstances may this Report or any extract or summary thereof be used in connection with any public or private securities offering including any related memorandum or prospectus for any securities offering or stock exchange listing or announcement. By acceptance of this Report you agree to be bound by this disclaimer. This disclaimer and any issues, disputes or claims arising out of or in connection with it (whether contractual or non-contractual in nature such as claims in tort, from breach of statute or regulation or otherwise) shall be governed by, and construed in a ccordance with, the laws of England and Wales to the exclusion of all conflict of laws principles and rules. All disputes or claims arising out of or relating to this disclaimer shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English and Welsh courts to which the parties irrevocably submit. 419419 | 419419-MMD-XX-SV-RP-YE-0002 | P03 | | 18 November 2020 Mott MacDonald | Confidential | Sevington Inland Border Facility An Analysis of the Likely Environmental Effects of the Development Report Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of the Report 1 1.2 Screening under the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations 1 1.2.1 Selection Criteria for Screening 2 2 The Scheme 4 2.1 Background to the need for the Special Development Order 4 2.2 Site Description 4 2.3 Scheme Description 6 2.3.1 Day 1 Operation and Works 8 2.3.2 Day 200 Operation and Works 11 2.3.3 Security Arrangements (During both Day 1 and Day 200 Scenario) 12 2.3.4 Reinstatement Works 13 2.4 Transport Assessment 14 2.5 Stakeholder Engagement 16 3 Environmental Effects 18 3.1 Assessment Methodology 18 3.1.1 Key assumptions and limitations 18 3.2 Air Quality 19 3.3 Cultural Heritage 21 3.4 Landscape and Visual Effects 24 3.5 Geology and Soils 27 3.6 Biodiversity 29 3.7 Material Assets and Waste 33 3.8 Noise and Vibration 36 3.9 Population and Human Health 38 3.10 Road Drainage and the Water Environment 42 3.11 Climate 44 3.12 Cumulative Effects 46 3.12.1 Relevant Developments 47 3.13 Heat and Radiation 57 3.14 Major Accidents and Disasters 57 3.15 Odour 57 4 Summary 59 A. Environmental Constraints Plan 65 419419 | 419419-MMD-XX-SV-RP-YE-0002 | P03 | | 18 November 2020 Mott MacDonald | Confidential | Sevington Inland Border Facility An Analysis of the Likely Environmental Effects of the Development Report B. Transport Assessment 66 C. Record of Environmental Actions and Commitments 67 C.1 Purpose of the Record of Environmental Actions and Commitments 67 D. Air Quality Impact Assessment 80 E. Cultural Heritage Assessment 81 F. Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment 82 G. Geotechnical Desk Study 83 H. Biodiversity Assessment 84 I. Arboricultural Report 85 J. Noise Impact Assessment 86 K. Drainage Strategy and Flood Risk Assessment 87 L. Carbon Assessment 88 M. Cumulative Effects Plan 89 Tables Table 1.1 Locations within this Report of the Selection Criteria for Screening Schedule 2 Development 2 Table 2.1 Summary of Works and Operational Phases 7 Table 2.2 Works Associated with Day 1 9 Table 2.3 Works Associated with Day 200 11 Table 2.4 Summary table of Day 1 and Day 200 scenarios 13 Table 2.5 Summary of SEB Engagement 16 Table 3.1: WCH amenities within the study area 39 Table 3.2: ZOI for each environmental discipline assessed in relation to cumulative effects 47 Table 3.3 EIA developments within 4km of the scheme 48 Table 3.4 Assessment of Likely Significant Cumulative Effects 52 Table 4.1 Summary of impacts, mitigation measures and significance of effect for each environmental discipline 60 Table C.4.2 Record of Environmental Actions and Commitments 68 419419 | 419419-MMD-XX-SV-RP-YE-0002 | P03 | | 18 November 2020 Mott MacDonald | Confidential | Sevington Inland Border Facility An Analysis of the Likely Environmental Effects of the Development Report Figures Figure 2.1 Site Location Plan 5 419419 | 419419-MMD-XX-SV-RP-YE-0002 | P03 | | 18 November 2020 Mott MacDonald | Confidential | Sevington Inland Border Facility 1 An Analysis of the Likely Environmental Effects of the Development Report 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the Report Mott MacDonald has been appointed by the Department for Transport (DfT) to undertake an analysis of the likely environmental effects of the development for the proposed use of a site at Sevington near Ashford in Kent (hereafter referred to as ‘the site’) for a temporary Inland Border Facility (IBF) (hereafter referred to as ‘the scheme’). The analysis is presented within this report, and it is required as per article 4(2)(h) of the Town and Country Planning (Border Facilities and Infrastructure) (EU Exit) (England) Special Development Order 2020. The objective of this analysis is to identify any likely adverse or beneficial significant environmental effects as a result of the scheme, and where relevant outline the measures incorporated in the scheme design and delivery methods to avoid, eliminate or reduce what might otherwise have been significant adverse environmental effects. Chapter 2 of this report describes the physical characteristics and location of the scheme. Chapter 3 of this report describes the environmental baseline, environmental constraints, sensitivity of the environmental receptors and the potential environmental effects of the scheme. The analysis has been undertaken in accordance with the guidance provided in the Sustainability and Environmental Sections of the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB). As the scheme is principally a transport related project, and as such, the DMRB provides the most appropriate published guidance for undertaking the analysis of environmental effects. Additional discipline specific guidance has also been applied where relevant, in order to provide a robust analysis of the effects. Relevant guidance is referenced for each discipline in Chapter 3 of this report. 1.2 Screening under the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended) (‘the EIA Regulations’) set out procedures for determining whether or not development is ‘EIA Development’ for which an Environmental Statement must be prepared to accompany a planning proposal. The EIA Regulations defines ‘EIA Development’ as either: (a) “Schedule 1 development; or, (b) Schedule 2 development likely to have significant effects on the environment by virtue of factors such as its nature, size or location.” Regulation 2(1) defines ‘Schedule 2 development’ as: “Development, other than exempt development, of a description mentioned in Column 1 of the table in Schedule 2 where – (a) Any part of the development is to be carried out in a sensitive area; or, (b) Any applicable threshold or criterion in the corresponding part of Column 2 of that table is respectively exceeded or met in relation to that development.” The scheme does not comprise development listed under Schedule 1 of the EIA Regulations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1.1 Ashford Borough Council (ABC); Kent County Council (KCC) Q
    Application by Highways England for an order granting development consent for the proposed M20 Junction 10a. TR01006. Ashford Borough Council’s response to Written Questions. 1.1 Ashford Borough Q Having regard to the criteria listed in para 1.2 of the NPSNN, is there any reason why the Council (ABC); Kent proposed development should not be determined in accordance with the NPSNN County Council (KCC) ABC Answer Ashford Borough Council (ABC) is not aware of any reason why the proposed development should not be determined in accordance with the criteria in paragraph 1.2 of the National Policy Statement for National Networks (NSNN), provided HE addresses the issues ABC raised through it’s relevant representations. 1.2 Applicant; ABC; KCC Q To what extent would the proposed development deliver the objectives of NPSNN to increase the capacity and improve the performance of the Strategic Road Network? ABC Answer Based on the documentation submitted by HE, ABC considers the development will deliver much needed additional capacity and will improve the performance of the Strategic Road Network. The South of Ashford Transport Study (1999) highlighted that the limited available capacity at the existing M20 Junction10 would mean that some development proposals in the then emerging Borough Local Plan 2000 would be unable to be built out unless a new 'Junction10a' could be provided. The council's current adopted development plan - the Core Strategy (2008) and Urban Sites and Infrastructure DPD (2012) place significant weight on the need for Junction10a to be delivered in order for allocated sites to be built out.
    [Show full text]
  • History Get Involved
    The Ashford A Wonderful Place How is the Green The Ashford Green Corridor ` for Wildlife Corridor managed? Green Corridor Faversham Nine out of ten people in the UK live in towns Ashford’s rivers are surprisingly natural considering The rivers, riverbanks, trees, orchards, wetland, a and cities, so green spaces in urban areas are very their urban surroundings. Kingfishers, grass snakes meadows, park areas, playing fields, ponds and M20 important as they provide a pleasant, relaxing and the banded demoiselle damselfly can all be hedges of the Green Corridor demand different environment for people as well as habitat for seen. Singleton Lake is a habitat for wetland birds kinds of management; management which bal- Canterbury Kennington wildlife. Ashford is lucky to have a range of green and Buxford Meadow is wet grassland with an ances wildlife conservation with maintaining good, A20 Orchard Bockhanger spaces, including public parks and recreation impressive range of plants, insects and other safe access and space for people to enjoy. Heights grounds, which link together to create a green species. Water voles are present in the Green corridor through the town. Corridor but they are secretive and generally hard Ashford Great Stour to spot! It is because of these habitats so close to A28 Warren Bybrook where people live that the Green Corridor has been Bybrook Godinton Cemetery designated as a Local Nature Reserve. Park Little Burton Conningbrook WHAT IS A LOCAL NATURE RESERVE? Lakes Local councils designate Local Nature Reserves. They are Walk 5 places of interest for their wildlife, offering opportunities for the enjoyment and study of nature through joining in with local events, education and practical management.
    [Show full text]
  • View CWCS14 Ashford Community Woodland Group
    Ashford Community Woodland GroupADD Kent, England The Research Agency of the A voluntary community group creating and managing a medium sized (15 hectare)Forestry peri Commission-urban woodland on Local Authority land to maintain local landscape and conservation values Ashford Community Woodland Group This case study is one of a set written as part of a Forest Research project. Some case studies are written by the community group, others by researchers who visited and interviewed group members, but they have all been validated and endorsed by the community groups. Forest Research developed a standard method for describing the case studies, outlined in Lawrence and Ambrose-Oji, 2013 “A framework for sharing experiences of community woodland groups” Forestry Commission Research Note 15 (available from www.forestry.gov.uk/publications). The case study comprises three parts: 1. The Group Profile provides essential information about the form and function of the community woodland group. Profiles were prepared following the methodology 2. The Change Narrative which documents key moments in the evolution of the community woodland group with a particular focus on the evolution of engagement and empowerment 3. The Engagement and Impacts Timeline documents milestones in the development of the community woodland group, its woodland and any assumed or evidenced impacts. The case studies collectively provide a resource which documents the diversity and evolution of community woodland groups across Scotland, Wales and England. The method ensures that
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Assessment of Kent 2004
    CHILHAM: STOUR VALLEY Location map: CHILHAMCHARACTER AREA DESCRIPTION North of Bilting, the Stour Valley becomes increasingly enclosed. The rolling sides of the valley support large arable fields in the east, while sweeps of parkland belonging to Godmersham Park and Chilham Castle cover most of the western slopes. On either side of the valley, dense woodland dominate the skyline and a number of substantial shaws and plantations on the lower slopes reflect the importance of game cover in this area. On the valley bottom, the river is picked out in places by waterside alders and occasional willows. The railway line is obscured for much of its length by trees. STOUR VALLEY Chilham lies within the larger character area of the Stour Valley within the Kent Downs AONB. The Great Stour is the most easterly of the three rivers cutting through the Downs. Like the Darent and the Medway, it too provided an early access route into the heart of Kent and formed an ancient focus for settlement. Today the Stour Valley is highly valued for the quality of its landscape, especially by the considerable numbers of walkers who follow the Stour Valley Walk or the North Downs Way National Trail. Despite its proximity to both Canterbury and Ashford, the Stour Valley retains a strong rural identity. Enclosed by steep scarps on both sides, with dense woodlands on the upper slopes, the valley is dominated by intensively farmed arable fields interspersed by broad sweeps of mature parkland. Unusually, there are no electricity pylons cluttering the views across the valley. North of Bilting, the river flows through a narrow, pastoral floodplain, dotted with trees such as willow and alder and drained by small ditches.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashford Green Corridor
    The Ashford A Wonderful Place How is the Green The Ashford Green Corridor ` for Wildlife Corridor managed? Green Corridor Faversham Nine out of ten people in the UK live in towns Ashford’s rivers are surprisingly natural considering The rivers, riverbanks, trees, orchards, wetland, a and cities, so green spaces in urban areas are very their urban surroundings. Kingfishers, grass snakes meadows, park areas, playing fields, ponds and M20 important as they provide a pleasant, relaxing and the banded demoiselle damselfly can all be hedges of the Green Corridor demand different Canterbury environment for people as well as habitat for seen. Singleton Lake is a habitat for wetland birds kinds of management; management which bal- Kennington wildlife. Ashford is lucky to have a range of green and Buxford Meadow is wet grassland with an ances wildlife conservation with maintaining good, A20 Orchard Bockhanger spaces, including public parks and recreation impressive range of plants, insects and other safe access and space for people to enjoy. Heights grounds, which link together to create a green species. Water voles are present in the Green corridor through the town. Corridor but they are secretive and generally hard Ashford Great Stour to spot! It is because of these habitats so close to A28 Warren Bybrook Bybrook where people live that the Green Corridor has been Godinton Cemetery designated as a Local Nature Reserve. Park Little Burton Conningbrook WHAT IS A LOCAL NATURE RESERVE? Lakes Local councils designate Local Nature Reserves. They are Walk 5 places of interest for their wildlife, offering opportunities for the enjoyment and study of nature through joining in with local events, education and practical management.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2014 Mid-Term Report
    KENT ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Mid-term Monitoring May 2014 term Monitoring Report 2014 May - Mid – Kent Environment Strategy Page 1 of 53 Introduction This report represents the mid-term review of the Kent Environment Strategy (KES). The report incorporates progress from across all three themes of the KES, and through the many actions within each theme represents a number of projects, individuals and public authorities. This year’s mid-term review has also included some highlights from a number of local district authorities. This is the last monitoring before a full review of the Strategy is undertaken over the period of September 2014 to June 2015, during which all actions and targets will be updated or amended accordingly, and will also include a review of Climate Local Kent (CLK) targets and incorporate learning from the existing KES and CLK. An overview of the planned review schedule is: • August / September 2014 – Full review of current activity and assessment of European, national and local drivers and activity (PESTEL analysis); • September – December 2014– Workshops and sector conversations to review priorities ; • January 2015 – Draft updated Kent Environment Strategy; • Feb/Mar 2015 – Draft circulated from comment and peer review; term Monitoring Report 2014 May • - April 2015 – Final draft; • Mid June/July 2015 – Sign up across partners (post-election). – Kent Environment Strategy Page 2 of 53 Table of Contents Theme 1 Living within our environmental limits .............................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Advising on Land and Water Management Including Surveys, Monitoring and Plans Work with Local Communities
    The KSCP is the principal organisation conserving, enhancing and promoting the countryside and urban green space of the Stour Valley. It is one of eight countryside/coastal partnerships in Kent and covers the largest area. In 2017/18 the Partnership carried out hundreds of projects from Smarden in the west, to Deal in the east, to Whitstable in the north, and Aldington to the south. The KSCP aligns its objectives with those of its key partners - Ashford Borough Council, Canterbury City Council, the Environment Agency and Kent County Council, without whose support it could not operate. We would like to thank all those involved with the Partnership, and especially our volunteers, for making a real difference to the landscape, wildlife and communities of this part of Kent. Work with local communities Supported 17 site based community groups with practical help managing their land. Brought 20 schools onto sites to carry out educational work, and worked with 22 other community groups. We also launched a three year Our Stour project grant aided by the Heritage Lottery Fund and other partners. We established 50 river wardens by the end of March. Karin Moncrieff, Trust Fundraising Manager, The Caldecott Foundation ‘Dear Debbie and Jo, Well, we got there in the end yester- day! Thank you so, so much for all you did to get the team sorted, supervised and indeed, virtually everything planted. It was a huge achievement and we really did appreciate all your help. I know we couldn't have done it without you. The Swiss Re people have been in touch and they were thrilled with the day, but I think there are a few stiff limbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashford Local Plan 2030
    Main Modifications to the Ashford Local Plan 2030 The Main Modifications are set out in plan order. The paragraph numbers and policy references refer to the Submission version of the Local Plan 2030 and do not take account of any other deletions or additions contained within these modifications. An explanation of the modification is provided in italics. Changes to text are expressed in the conventional form of either strikethrough for deletions and underlining for additions of text. Policy wording is shown in bold. Modification LOCAL PLAN MAIN MODIFICATION (MM) number: SECTION/POLICY MM1 Chapter 2 Amend paragraph 2.8 and 2.8.1 text to read: Introduction - Neighbourhood 2.8 This Local Plan sets out the strategic context within which any Neighbourhood Plan (NP) will operate. They must comply with national policy, with EU obligations and Plans human rights requirements and with the strategic policies of the local development plan. For the purposes of neighbourhood planning, all the policies within this local plan are considered strategic, not just those within the strategic policies section. have been assessed using guidance provided in Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) on Neighbourhood Planning (Paras 75 and 76). However, it is likely that some policies may not be ‘strategic’ in all NP circumstances, particularly where the policy may refer to a specific geographical area, site or landscape which is not applicable to that NP area. There is also scope for a NP to be more specific than the Local Plan in relation to some topic policies, and where evidence supports this position. Some smaller site allocations in this plan are not strategic in themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • M20 Junction
    M20 Junction 10a TR010006 4.1 Statement of Reasons APFP Regulation 5(2)(h) Revision BA Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 M20 Junction 10a Error! No text of specified style in document. Error! No text of specified style in document. Error! No text of specified style in document. Error! No text of specified style in document. Volume 4 July May 20167 M20 Junction 10a TR010006 4.1 Statement of Reasons Volume 4 This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission used for any other purpose. which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. Date: July May 20176 Issue and revision record Revision Date Description A July 2016 DCO Submission B May 2017 DCO submission (deadline 7) This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission used for any other purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • C10349 Exe Summarydoc DD.Indd
    SUSTAINABLE CULTURE, SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES The Cultural Framework and Toolkit for Thames Gateway North Kent Executive Summary Preface Welcome to the Executive Summary of the Cultural Framework and Toolkit for Thames Gateway North Kent (TGNK). It provides an overview of this groundbreaking initiative and lists the key recommendations for strategic planners. The full Framework and Toolkit is available online at www. seco.org.uk, the South East Cultural Observatory. The Framework and Toolkit is designed to help integrate culture into the regeneration and growth of TGNK. Culture touches and uplifts the lives of everyone in the UK. Developing access to a range of cultural activities and opportunities is an important part of the Government’s vision for sustainable communities in the Thames Gateway. The Framework and Toolkit was created by a unique collaboration between the South East d) Englan Cultural Agencies; the Department for Communities and Local Government; the Department for Culture, Media and Sport; Local Authorities; Local Regeneration Partnerships; SEEDA; the Regional irl athletics (Sport athletics irl Assembly; GOSE; National Lottery distributing G bodies; and others. We hope that you find the Framework and Toolkit useful and that it becomes an important element in the decision-making process for cultural development in TGNK. We look forward to continuing to work together to deliver sustainable communities in TGNK. Yvette Cooper MP Minister for Housing and Planning Richard Caborn MP Minister for Sport July 2006 Cover (clockwise from top left): Girls netball (Sport England South East) / Medway library user (Photo: Medway Libraries) / Father and child at Gosport Library (Photo: Hampshire County Council) / Rochester Castle Curtain Wall (Photo: Medway Council) / Woman showjumper (Photo: Sport England South East) / Gravesend Big Day Out (Photo: North West Kent Racial Equality Council) / Rollerblade contest (Photo: Sport England South East) / Older man walking (Photo: Sport England South East) 2 The Framework 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashford Borough Council on Behalf of Head of Culture, As Landowner of Plot 3/14/A and Plot3/14/B and the Proposed Replacement Land
    M20 Junction 10a TR010006 ABC’s Comments as landowner Len Mayatt 16th January 2017 These written representations are submitted by Ashford Borough Council on behalf of Head of Culture, as landowner of Plot 3/14/a and Plot3/14/b and the proposed replacement land. 1 Background 1. These written representations should be read in conjunction with the relevant representations submitted in October 2016. 2. Ashford Borough Council (ABC) recognises the importance and relevance of the proposed new junction. However, as owner of the land, it is important that the scheme works for the local community and the Borough Council. 3. ABC owns plots 3/14/a, 3/14/b 3/14/c and 3/14/d. Plots 3/14/a and 3/14/b form part of the public open space land at Church Road which is used for the purposes of public recreation and enjoyment. 4. This land is also designated as a local nature reserve and forms part of the Ashford Green Corridor. 5. The land at Church Road combines complementary wildlife habitats, such as dense scrub, trees and semi-natural grass areas; children’s play space, including the opportunity for informal pay in a safe and attractive space; visual quality to the immediate residential area, introducing a green element to the residential street environment; forming part of the Public Right Of Way and well used pedestrian route from South Willesborough to Sevington; providing a quiet and relaxing green space where people enjoy informal sport and contact with nature and fresh air. 6. As part of the DCO Highways England (HE) wishes to permanently acquire by compulsory acquisition Plot 3/14/b., which forms part of the public open space at Church Road.
    [Show full text]
  • M20 Junction
    M20 Junction 10a TR010006 Comments on Relevant Representations Revision A Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Volume 10.7 January 2017 M20 Junction 10a TR010006 Comments on Relevant Representations Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Volume 10.7 Date: January 2017 Comments on Relevant Representations M20 Junction 10a TR010006 Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A January 2017 Mott MacDonald Mott MacDonald Highways England DCO submission (deadline 3) Sweco Sweco AECOM This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission used for any other purpose. which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. HA514442-MMGJV-GEN-SMW-RE-Z-10701 Revision A Comments on Relevant Representations M20 Junction 10a TR010006 Content Chapter Title Page Content 1 1. Applicant’s Comments on Relevant Representations 3 1.1 RR-001 _______________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]