'Tongue of Land' Is the Wadawurrung / Wathaurong
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
AUG 2008 Wurundjeri RAP Appointment Decision Pdf 43.32 KB
DECISION OF THE VICTORIAN ABORIGINAL HERITAGE COUNCIL IN RELATION TO AN APPLICATION BY WURUNDJERI TRIBE LAND AND COMPENSATION CULTURAL HERITAGE COUNCIL INC TO BE A REGISTERED ABORIGINAL PARTY DATE OF DECISION: 22 AUGUST 2008 Decision The Victorian Aboriginal Heritage Council (“the Council”) registers the Wurundjeri Tribe Land and Compensation Cultural Heritage Council Inc (“Wurundjeri Inc”) as a registered Aboriginal party (“RAP”) over part of its application area. A map showing the area for which Wurundjeri Inc has been made a RAP (“the RAP Area”) is attached (Attachment 1). The Council is still considering the remaining area for which Wurundjeri Inc has sought to be a RAP. Reasons for Decision The Council accepts that Wurundjeri Inc is an organisation that represents the Traditional Owners of the RAP Area. The members of Wurundjeri Inc are all descendants of a Woiwurrung / Wurundjeri man Bebejan, through his daughter Annie Borate (Boorat), and in turn, her son Robert Wandin (Wandoon). Bebejan was Ngurungaeta (headman) of the Wurundjeri people and was present at John Batman’s ‘treaty’ signing in 1835. Wurundjeri Inc was incorporated in 1985 and has had a long history of managing and protecting cultural heritage in its application area on behalf of Woiwurrung people. The Council was satisfied Wurundjeri Inc is capable of carrying out the functions of a RAP. RAP applications have also been made by other Traditional Owner groups in the vicinity of (and in some cases overlapping with) the Wurundjeri RAP application area. These include the Wathaurung/ Wathaurong people to the west, the Dja Dja Wurrung/ Jaara Jaara people to the north-west, the Taungurung people to the north, the Gunai/Kurnai people to the east and the Boon Wurrung/ Bunurong people to the south. -
The Gunditjmara Land Justice Story Jessica K Weir
The legal outcomes the Gunditjmara achieved in the 1980s are often overlooked in the history of land rights and native title in Australia. The High Court Onus v Alcoa case and the subsequent settlement negotiated with the State of Victoria, sit alongside other well known bench marks in our land rights history, including the Gurindji strike (also known as the Wave Hill Walk-Off) and land claim that led to the development of land rights legislation in the Northern Territory. This publication links the experiences in the 1980s with the Gunditjmara’s present day recognition of native title, and considers the possibilities and limitations of native title within the broader context of land justice. The Gunditjmara Land Justice Story JESSICA K WEIR Euphemia Day, Johnny Lovett and Amy Williams filming at Cape Jessica Weir together at the native title Bridgewater consent determination Amy Williams is an aspiring young Jessica Weir is a human geographer Indigenous film maker and the focused on ecological and social communications officer for the issues in Australia, particularly water, NTRU. Amy has recently graduated country and ecological life. Jessica with her Advanced Diploma of completed this project as part of her Media Production, and is developing Research Fellowship in the Native Title and maintaining communication Research Unit (NTRU) at the Australian strategies for the NTRU. Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. The Gunditjmara Land Justice Story JESSICA K WEIR First published in 2009 by the Native Title Research Unit, the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies GPO Box 553 Canberra ACT 2601 Tel: (61 2) 6246 1111 Fax: (61 2) 6249 7714 Email: [email protected] Web: www.aiatsis.gov.au/ Written by Jessica K Weir Copyright © Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. -
Bushfires in Our History, 18512009
Bushfires in Our History, 18512009 Area covered Date Nickname Location Deaths Losses General (hectares) Victoria Portland, Plenty 6 February Black Ranges, Westernport, 12 1 million sheep 5,000,000 1851 Thursday Wimmera, Dandenong 1 February Red Victoria 12 >2000 buildings 260,000 1898 Tuesday South Gippsland These fires raged across Gippsland throughout 14 Feb and into Black Victoria 31 February March, killing Sunday Warburton 1926 61 people & causing much damage to farms, homes and forests Many pine plantations lost; fire New South Wales Dec 1938‐ began in NSW Snowy Mts, Dubbo, 13 Many houses 73,000 Jan 1939 and became a Lugarno, Canberra 72 km fire front in Canberra Fires Victoria widespread Throughout the state from – Noojee, Woods December Point, Omeo, 1300 buildings 13 January 71 1938 Black Friday Warrandyte, Yarra Town of Narbethong 1,520,000 1939 January 1939; Glen, Warburton, destroyed many forests Dromona, Mansfield, and 69 timber Otway & Grampian mills Ranges destroyed Fire burnt on Victoria 22 buildings 34 March 1 a 96 km front Hamilton, South 2 farms 1942 at Yarram, Sth Gippsland 100 sheep Gippsland Thousands 22 Victoria of acres of December 10 Wangaratta grass 1943 country Plant works, 14 Victoria coal mine & January‐ Central & Western 32 700 homes buildings 14 Districts, esp >1,000,000 Huge stock losses destroyed at February Hamilton, Dunkeld, Morwell, 1944 Skipton, Lake Bolac Yallourn ACT 1 Molongolo Valley, Mt 2 houses December Stromlo, Red Hill, 2 40 farm buildings 10,000 1951 Woden Valley, Observatory buildings Tuggeranong, Mugga ©Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority, State Government of Victoria, 2011, except where indicated otherwise. -
Expedtion from Van Diemen's Land to Port Phillip in 1835
(No. 44.) 1885. PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA. EXPEDI'TION FROM VAN DIEMEN'S LAND TO PORT PHILLIP IN 1835. Presented to both Houses ot Parliament by l-t is Excellency's Command. EXPEDITION FROM VAN DIEMEN'S LAND TO PORT PHILLIP, 1835 ■ Hobart Town, 25tl1 June, 1835. Srn, ' I HAVE the honor of reporting to Your Excellency, for the information of His Majesty's Government, the result of an Expedition undertaken by myself, at the expense and in conjunC'tion with several gentlemen, inhabitants of Van Diemen's Land, to Port Phillip, on the south-western point of New Holland, for the purpose of forming an extensive Pastoral Establishment, and combining therewith the civilization of the Native Tribes who are living in that part of the country. Before I enter into the details I deem it necessary to state, for the information of His Majesty's Government, that I am a native of New South Wales, and that for the last six years I have been most actively employed in endeavoring to civilize the Aboriginal Natives of Van Diemen's Land, and in order to enable the local Government of this Colony to carry that important object into full effect, I procured from New South Wales eleven aboriginal Natives of New Holland, who were, under my guidance, mainly instrumental in carrying into effect the humane objects of this Government · towards the Aborigines of this Island. I also deem it necessary to state that I have been for many years impressed with the opinion that a most advantag·eous Settlement might be formed at Western Port, or Port Phillip, and that, in 1827, Mr. -
Engaging Indigenous Communities
Engaging Indigenous Communities REGIONAL INDIGENOUS FACILITATOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLE’S GOALS AND The Port Phillip & Westernport CMA employs a Regional ASPIRATIONS Indigenous Facilitator funded through the Australian During 2014/15, a study was undertaken with Government’s National Landcare Programme. In Wurundjeri, Wathaurung, Wathaurong and Boon 2014/15, the facilitator arranged numerous events Wurrung people regarding their communities’ goals and and activities to improve the Indigenous cultural aspirations for involvement in land management and awareness and understanding of Board members and sustainable agriculture. The study improved the mutual staff from the Port Phillip & Westernport CMA and from understanding of priority activities for the future and various other organisations and community groups. set a basis for potential formal agreements between The facilitator also worked directly with Indigenous the Port Phillip & Westernport CMA and the Indigenous organisations and communities to document their goals organisations. relating to natural resource management and agriculture. A coordinated program of grants was established to help INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENT GRANTS Indigenous organisations undertake on-ground projects and training to increase employment opportunities. In 2014/15, $75,000 of Indigenous environment grants were awarded as part of the Port Phillip & Westernport IMPROVING CULTURAL AWARENESS AND CMA’s project. This included grants to: UNDERSTANDING • Wathaurung Aboriginal Corporation to run 4 community, business and corporate -
Eco-Hydrological Investigation and Restoration Planning for Big Marsh
Eco-hydrological Investigation and Restoration Planning for Big Marsh The Spit Nature Conservation Reserve, Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula Ramsar Site Report to Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment Management Authority Ben Taylor, Mark Bachmann, Lachlan Farrington and Tessa Roberts 27th September 2020 Eco-hydrological Investigation and Restoration Planning for Big Marsh. The Spit Nature Conservation Reserve. Citation Taylor B., Bachmann M., Farrington L. and Roberts, T. (2020) Eco-hydrological Investigation and Restoration Planning for Big Marsh. The Spit Nature Conservation Reserve, Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula Ramsar Site. Report to Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment Management Authority. NGT Consulting – Nature Glenelg Trust, Mumbannar, Victoria. For correspondence in relation to this report, please contact: Mr Ben Taylor Senior Wetland Ecologist Nature Glenelg Trust 0434 620 646 [email protected] OR Mr Mark Bachmann Principal Ecologist Nature Glenelg Trust 0421 978 181 [email protected] Disclaimer This report has been developed using the best information available and all efforts have been made to ensure accuracy. No warranty express or implied is provided for any errors or omissions, nor in the event of its use for any other purposes or by any other parties. Page ii Eco-hydrological Investigation and Restoration Planning for Big Marsh. The Spit Nature Conservation Reserve. Acknowledgements This investigation was commissioned by Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment Management Authority, through funding from the Australian Government’s National Landcare Program. We would especially like to acknowledge and thank the following people for their generous assistance with this investigation: Andrew Morrison (Port Phillip and Westernport CMA) for contract management, technical support and providing assistance with fieldwork. -
Mangroves and Salt Marshes in Westernport Bay, Victoria Robyn Ross
Mangroves and Salt Marshes in Westernport Bay, Victoria BY Robyn Ross Arthur Rylah Institute Flora, Fauna & Freshwater Research PARKS, FLORA AND FAUNA ARTHUR RYLAH INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 123 BROWN STREET (PO BOX 137) HEIDELBERG VIC 3084 TEL: (03) 9450 8600 FAX: (03) 9450 8799 (ABN: 90719052204) JUNE 2000 0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following people assisted in gathering information for this review: Michele Arundell, Dale Tonkinson, David Cameron, Carol Harris, Paul Barker, Astrid d’Silva, Dr. Neil Saintilan, Kerrylee Rogers and Claire Turner. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................1 MANGROVE-SALT MARSH MAPPING IN WESTERNPORT BAY....................................................................................................4 MANGROVE–SALT MARSH MONITORING IN WESTERNPORT BAY..................................................................................................10 MANGROVE-SALT MARSH MONITORING IN NEW SOUTH WALES ..................................................................................................20 SEDIMENT ELEVATION TABLE (SET).........................................................................22 SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................23 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................25 APPENDIX I Westernport Contacts .......................................................................................................30 -
Regional Development Victoria Annual Report RDV Annual Report 2006/07
2006/07 Regional Development Victoria Annual Report RDV Annual Report 2006/07 Contents Section 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................4 1.1 Chief Executive Foreword ..............................................................................................................5 Section 2.0 Overview of Regional Development Victoria ....................................................................................8 2.1 Profi le of Regional Development Victoria .........................................................................................9 2.2 Structure of Regional Development Victoria ..................................................................................10 2.3 Regional Development Advisory Committee .................................................................................12 Section 3.0 Year In Review ............................................................................................................................14 3.1 Highlights 2006/07 .....................................................................................................................15 3.2 Case Studies 2006/07 ................................................................................................................31 3.3 Regional Infrastructure Development Fund projects in review .........................................................44 3.4 Small Towns Development Fund projects in review .......................................................................51 -
1 the Joint Select Committee on Future Gaming Marke
THE JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE ON FUTURE GAMING MARKETS MET IN COMMITTEE ROOM 2, PARLIAMENT HOUSE, HOBART ON FRIDAY, 18 AUGUST 2017 Ms LEANNE MINSHULL, DIRECTOR, THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE TASMANIA WAS CALLED VIA TELECONFERENCE AND WAS EXAMINED. CHAIR (Mr Gaffney) - Thank you, Leanne, for agreeing to discuss your paper and present to the committee. Ms MINSHULL - Thanks for the opportunity. CHAIR - We have received a copy of your report and have tabled that as part of our evidence. That is why it is important for us to speak to you, because then it can be used to help us with our report. Leanne, please give an introduction and overview of the report and how it came about. After that, members might like to ask questions about specifics within the report. Ms MINSHULL - Okay, great. I am sitting in an airport so occasionally there will get announcements in the background, but I will just plough on. The Australia Institute Tasmania is a national institute that has been in operation since about 1994. They have a long history in looking at economic policy issues, in particular jobs, unemployment and what direct and indirect jobs can be attributed to specific industries. We looked at the gaming industry, in particular, in Tasmania for two reasons. One is because we recently started a branch there. We've been open in Tasmania for about six months. It is obviously a contested issue in the community. As part of our national work we look at Australian Bureau of Statistics statistics every time the quarterly statistics come out. We noticed a few anomalies between what was being reported as direct and indirect employment in Tasmania in the gambling industry and what we would normally see using some of the ABS data. -
Racist Structures and Ideologies Regarding Aboriginal People in Contemporary and Historical Australian Society
Master Thesis In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science: Development and Rural Innovation Racist structures and ideologies regarding Aboriginal people in contemporary and historical Australian society Robin Anne Gravemaker Student number: 951226276130 June 2020 Supervisor: Elisabet Rasch Chair group: Sociology of Development and Change Course code: SDC-80436 Wageningen University & Research i Abstract Severe inequalities remain in Australian society between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people. This research has examined the role of race and racism in historical Victoria and in the contemporary Australian government, using a structuralist, constructivist framework. It was found that historical approaches to governing Aboriginal people were paternalistic and assimilationist. Institutions like the Central Board for the Protection of Aborigines, which terrorised Aboriginal people for over a century, were creating a racist structure fuelled by racist ideologies. Despite continuous activism by Aboriginal people, it took until 1967 for them to get citizens’ rights. That year, Aboriginal affairs were shifted from state jurisdiction to national jurisdiction. Aboriginal people continue to be underrepresented in positions of power and still lack self-determination. The national government of Australia has reproduced historical inequalities since 1967, and racist structures and ideologies remain. ii iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor, Elisabet Rasch, for her support and constructive criticism. I thank my informants and other friends that I met in Melbourne for talking to me and expanding my mind. Floor, thank you for showing me around in Melbourne and for your never-ending encouragement since then, via phone, postcard or in person. Duane Hamacher helped me tremendously by encouraging me to change the topic of my research and by sharing his own experiences as a researcher. -
Fyke-Netting Guidelines, Updated 07.19
Platypus Fyke-netting Guidelines Introduction This document (most recently revised in July 2019) aims to (1) identify the welfare issues that can arise when a platypus is captured in a fyke net and outline ways to reduce these risks, (2) identify the welfare issues for vertebrate by-catch that can arise when fyke nets are set for platypus and outline ways to reduce these risks, and (3) describe recommended protocols for platypus transport and handling, how best to deal with captured animals that are hypothermic or entangled in litter, and how best to release a platypus back to the wild (see Appendix 1). Although mainly drawn from the experience of APC biologists working in Victoria, the principles outlined below should be widely relevant across the platypus’s range. Platypus welfare issues associated with fyke-netting Drowning. By dropping its heart rate to as little as 1.2 beats per minute, an inactive platypus can survive underwater for up to 11 minutes (Evans et al. 1994). However, this interval is reduced to less than 3 minutes when animals are active (Grant et al. 2004). The platypus will therefore drown quickly if held inside a submerged fyke net. This is most likely to occur if water levels rise after nets have been set, e.g. due to rainfall. Increased water depth and/or flow velocity may inundate fyke nets or cause them to collapse after tearing them loose from their anchoring points. Hypothermia. The platypus normally maintains a body temperature close to 32oC in both air and water (Grant and Dawson 1978a; Grant 1983). -
Ees Inquiry Greater Geelong Planning Scheme: Amendment C150 and Pp673/2007
Environment Effects Act 1978 Planning and Environment Act 1987 EES INQUIRY GREATER GEELONG PLANNING SCHEME: AMENDMENT C150 AND PP673/2007 STOCKLAND WATERWAYS AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT POINT LONSDALE REPORT OF THE PANEL Panel: Kathryn Mitchell William O’Neil Peter Sheehan Catherine Wilson October 2008 EES: Stockland Waterways and Residential Development, Point Lonsdale Greater Geelong Scheme: Amendment C150 and PP673/2007 Report of the Panel: October 2008 EES INQUIRY and GREATER GEELONG PLANNING SCHEME: AMENDMENT C150 AND PP673/2007 STOCKLAND WATERWAYS AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT OF THE PANEL Kathryn Mitchell, Chair William O’Neil, Member Peter Sheehan, Member Catherine Wilson, Member October 2008 EES: Stockland Waterways and Residential Development, Point Lonsdale Greater Geelong Scheme: Amendment C150 and PP673/2007 Report of the Panel: October 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................1 PART 1: BACKGROUND......................................................................................................5 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................6 1.1 THE PANEL ...................................................................................................................6 1.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE ..................................................................................................7 1.3 SUBMISSIONS AND HEARINGS......................................................................................8