Discussion, Deliberation, and Possible Decision to Affirm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Discussion, Deliberation, and Possible Decision to Affirm NYE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: July 19, 2011 AGENDA ITEMS Appeal of Pahrump Re2ional Planning Commission Decision: AP-11-0001: Discussion, deliberation, and possible decision to affirm, modify, or reverse the Pahrump Regional Planning Commission’s decision to approve Conditional Use Permit Application CU- 11-0006 allowing Red Apple Fireworks Company to conduct the retail sale of fireworks located at 3610 S. Nevada Highway 160, Pahrump, Nevada, further described as Block 2, Lot 4 of Calvada Valley Unit 1, Assessor Parcel Number 42-451-13. Vegas of Pahrump, Inc. — Appellant. GENERAL INFORMATION SUMMARY The Pahrump Regional Planning Commission (RPC) held its hearing on Conditional Use Permit application CU-11-0006 on April 26, 2011. The RPC, after conducting a public hearing, voted to approve the Conditional Use Permit along with an associated Waiver application, subject to standard and special conditions of approval (see attached RPC staff report). An appeal was filed by B.J. Alan Company (Phantom Fireworks) on May 23, 2011 regarding the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit granted to Red Apple Fireworks. The appeal filed by B.J. Alan Company was within the 30 day time frame required by Nye County Code. The BOCC may affirm, modify, or reverse the Pabrump Regional Planning Commission’s decision to approve Conditional Use Permit Application. RPC MINUTES RPC Minutes (from the April 26, 2011 RPC meeting): Commissioner Kimball stated that he had wanted to start with comments from the Sheriff about fireworks requirements. Commissioner Kimball stated he would like information from Mr. Steve Osborne. Commissioner Kimball asked for specifics on the issue. Mr. Osborne referred to the specifics of the staff report. Commissioner Kimball asked if we were to approve the CUP what would that mean for the general citizens. If you are a citizen of Nye County then you would not be able to buy the fireworks here in Nye County. Mr. Osborne stated that the person that purchased the fireworks would be able to use those fireworks outside of Nye County. There has been a private place in AmargosaiT to set the fireworks off but you must leave the county within 24 hours. Commissioner Koenig stated that there are limitations on retail sales. Retail sales are restricted from June 25, 2011 and July 4, 2011 per the code. Commissioner Kimball asked about the 1500 foot distance and the fact that is required in the CUP and Waiver permit. Commissioner Kimball stated that is a safety mechanism of some type and we are sure. Douglas Berda spoke as the applicant. He stated he was very appreciative of the fact that the RPC has come together for this special meeting. His family has been in the fireworks business for over 30 years. It becomes an event with concessions and such that he would like to think that he could do something like a shooter site because it would bring money into the town. He feels that it could be a positive impact to the community in the long term. Mr. Berda requested a review of the time period limitations. Commissioner Koenig stated he agreed with his assessment of the provision. Mr. Berda stated that there is definitely some confusion in the code. He also stated that he has spoken to neighbors in the area that he spoke to was in full support of the business that he is proposing. Commissioner Opatik asked what his hours of operation were and Mr. Berda stated that he would be looking at 9am to 9pm. Mr. Brent Steed from Pahrump Building and Safety stated the fire code that only within. 100 feet not 1500 feet. Commissioner Parker stated she did not want to limit the businesses hours because there are businesses in the area that operate 24 hours a day. Commissioner Opatik stated that the codes are the codes so we have to deal with the codes we have been dealt. She stated that this is a mixed use master plan and zoning. The get to general commercial and we have to have a CUP to get to general commercial and then from there we have to get another CUP to deal with the current zoning. Area 51 had a fire in 2010 and the question was how big the safety perimeter was. Chief Scott Lewis stated that the perimeter was within a good vicinity of a fire hydrant and that it was not hard to contain. Commissioner Opatik asked if there was a fire event in the proposed building would there be a risk to the residents in the area. Chief Lewis stated that the difference is that this proposed building is in a sprinklered facility. Commissioner Kimball stated that from what he understands from Mr. Osborne and from what Commissioner Opatik is saying are two different things. Mr. Osborne stated that the way we have the item proposed today, this is the way the action should be taken. Commissioner Opatik stated she just doesn’t understand how we are getting from mixed use to a general commercial CUP. 2 ________________ Mr. Osborne stated that if the business meets the general use and condition of the district then it is allowed in that area. It fits in the neighborhood commercial business but Mr. Osborne agreed that it would fit in this use. Mr. Berda stated that the business will adhere to the 2006 fire code which none of the other fireworks stores are at this point. Public comment opened at 2:35 Tim McCoy stated that he has been in the fireworks business for over 30 years. He stated that there are afready six permits being used in this county so how could we even be here today because all of them are active right now. He asked that the NFPA is the one that 1500 foot residence regulation. Lori Orman from Phantom Fireworks wanted to follow up on the six permits that are already being used in the County. Casey Steinhart stated that it would be a hardship if there has to be a waiver and he doesn’t have one. Public comment closed at 2:41 pm. Mr. Berda stated that this is obviously the wrong forum for this argument. Yes he understands that the public policy should be to put all the permits into use and not to create a monopoly. He stated that the fire code is the 100 foot radius. He stated that he has taken all of the proper precautions and paperwork. Mr. Berda stated he had read all of the standard and special conditions and Mr. Osborne stated he stands behind them. Mr. Schinhofen asked of Mr. Osborne has final action on this item. Commissioner Kimball stated that it would go before the BOCC after this as Waivers and Conditional Use Permits are finalized before the BOCC. Commissioner Hand stated that the vote to approve is that it is the RPC’s duty to do this based on the fact there is no opposition on the item. Commissioner Opatik made a motion to approve. Commissioner Parker seconde’L Roll Call Vote: Parker, yes; Opatik, yes; Kimball, yes; Minnick, yes; Hand, yes; Koenig, yes. Motion Passes 6-0. RECOMMENDATION Recommended BOCC Motion: “I motion to [options include: 1.) affirm, 2.) modify, or 3.) reverse] the Pabrump Regional Planning Commission’s decision on Conditional Use Permit Application CU- 11-0006.” 3 B.J. ALAN COMPANY Distributors of Phantom® and Wolf Pack® Brand Fireworks Corporate Office: 555 Martin Luther King, Jr. BiviL Phone: 330-746-1064 Youngstown, Ohio 44502-1102 Fax:330-746-4410 Laurie Orman Web Site: wwwfireworks.com E-Mail: Paump)fweworkcom May 23, 2011 NYE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 2100 East Walt Williams Drive Suite 100 Pahrump, Nevada 89406 Re: Planning Commission Conditional Use Approval Red Apple Fireworks, Inc. Dear sirs: Kindly accept this communication as a formal appeal submitted by Vegas of Pahrump, Inc.., a Nevada corporate resident of Nye County, Nevada, in accordance with Nye County Code §16.36.080(B) to the decision by the Nye County Planning Commission approving the above— noted Conditional Use Application. The decision by the Planning Commission was made on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, therefore the filing of this appeal is timely within the purview of the Nye County Code. The Appellant hereby notes the following issues on which it is submitted that the Nye County Planning Commission erred in making its decision and approving the application for the Conditional Use Permit. Based on such errors, the Appellant respectfully requests that the Nye County Board of Commissioners reverse the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the Conditional Use Permit. The specific errors that this Appellant believes justify reversal of the Planning Commission’s decision in this matter are as follows: 1. The Planning Commission erred in granting the Conditional Use Permit with total disregard of the provision of Nye County Code §17.04.700(A) (18) requiring a separation of 1,500 feet between a fireworks sales facility and any residence. 2. The Planning Commission erred in granting a waiver or exemption from the strict interpretation of the Nye County Code without making a finding pursuant to Nye County Code §17.04.915(E) (1) and §17.04.915 (H) (1) that there were special circumstances or conditions applying to the property which would make compliance with the waived provision of the Nye County Code difficult and cause a hardship to and abridgement of a property right of the owner of said property. B.J. ALAN COMPANY Youngstown, Ohio 44502—1102 NYE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Page 2 May 23, 2011 3.
Recommended publications
  • Fireworks Position Statement
    Fireworks Position Statement Position Statement Prevent Blindness supports the development and enforcement of bans on the 211 West Wacker Drive importation, sale and use of all fireworks and sparklers, except those used in Suite 1700 authorized public displays by competent licensed operators. Chicago, Illinois 60606 800.331.2020 In order to eliminate the health and economic impact of fireworks accidents, PreventBlindness.org Prevent Blindness further supports the following: • All state governments should adopt a uniform model law that would establish standards and codes for public fireworks displays conducted under controlled conditions by trained and licensed personnel. • The importation, general sale and indiscriminate use of all fireworks (including consumer fireworks and sparklers) by unlicensed adults and children should be banned. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission should work to ban the use of consumer fireworks and sparklers by the public. • Federal agencies should enact and/or rigidly enforce regulations prohibiting the importation, Internet/mail order and interstate transportation of consumer fireworks and sparklers. • Healthcare practitioners and local authorities should be required to report any fireworks or sparkler-related injuries, property damages and deaths. Injuries and incidents can be reported to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission by calling 800.638.2772 or filing a report on their website, http:// www.cpsc.gov/. • All professionals, organizations and agencies concerned with the safety of the American public should intensify educational efforts to inform adults and children of the hazards associated with the use of all types of fireworks and sparklers. Note: Sparklers include two classifications, based upon the type of combustible used: Certain sparklers are classified as 1.4G fireworks (often called “consumer fireworks”), while others are classified as “novelties.” Both types of sparklers burn at 1800 degrees Fahrenheit.
    [Show full text]
  • Fireworks Laws and Safety Information 2019
    MEDFORD FIRE-RESCUE FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION www.medfordfirerescue.org 200 S. Ivy St., Room #180 Medford, OR 97501 Telephone (541) 774-2300 FAX (541) 774-2514 Media Release- June 12, 2019 Fireworks Laws and Safety Information Changes to Medford’s Fireworks Ordinance…. We are informing citizens that Medford’s fireworks ordinance changed this year. The time period to use Oregon legal consumer fireworks in legal areas during fire season has been reduced from 14 days to 6 days. Now, Oregon legal consumer fireworks can only be used in legal areas from July 1 – July 6 during fire season. In addition, the penalty of using Oregon illegal fireworks has increased from $250 to $2,500. Police Officers and Fire Officials will be out patrolling, issuing citations and confiscating illegal fireworks and explosives. As a reminder: • Prohibited Medford Areas: It is illegal within the city limits to discharge any fireworks in the hillside areas, the Bear Creek Greenway, any City park, or any public school. • Oregon Illegal Fireworks: Any type of aerial firework is illegal for citizens to discharge in the state of Oregon. This would include mortars, bottle or sky rockets, and Roman candles or similar devices that shoot flaming balls. According the State statutes, any device that explodes, flies into the air, behaves in an uncontrolled and unpredictable manner, or travels more than 12 feet horizontally is illegal to use in the State of Oregon. • Oregon Illegal Explosives: Explosive devices are illegal to use in the State of Oregon, including firecrackers and M-80's. Medford Fire-Rescue wants you to have a safe and legal Independence Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Fireworks Publication #12
    Fireworks Publication #12 The American traditions of parades, cookouts, and to the ground instantly. He was transported to a fireworks help us celebrate the summer season, local hospital by emergency responders and was especially our nation's birthday on the Fourth of pronounced dead. The victim had been drinking July. However, fireworks can turn a joyful alcohol before the incident. celebration into a painful memory when children and adults are injured or killed while using A 44-year-old male was killed when a mortar shell fireworks. Although legal consumer fireworks that firework exploded. According to witnesses, after comply with U.S. Consumer Product Safety successfully launching three shells with the launching tube on the cement ground, the victim Commission (CPSC) regulations can be relatively decided to launch the fourth shell while holding safe when used responsibly, all fireworks, by their the launch tube with his arms extended and the nature, are hazardous and can cause injuries. tube pointed in an upward angle. The tube blew up Fireworks are classified as hazardous substances from the back and hit the victim directly in the under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act chest, knocking him backwards eight to ten feet (FHSA). Some fireworks, such as illegal into a fence. He died shortly after the explosion. firecracker-type devices (M-80s, quarter sticks) Medical examiners found the tube's base plug, and professional display fireworks should never which measured 1-7/8" in diameter and 2-1/8" be handled by consumers, due to the risk of tall, deep inside the victim’s chest.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN ACADEMY of PEDIATRICS Fireworks-Related
    AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS Committee on Injury and Poison Prevention Fireworks-Related Injuries to Children ABSTRACT. An estimated 8500 individuals, approxi- contain up to 130 mg of powder charge. In addition, mately 45% of them children younger than 15 years, were CPSC regulations include fuse burn time limits, cau- treated in US hospital emergency departments during tionary labeling requirements, and criteria to prevent 1999 for fireworks-related injuries. The hands (40%), eyes tipover and blowout of devices. Additional regula- (20%), and head and face (20%) are the body areas most often involved. Approximately one third of eye injuries tions address requirements for certain reloadable from fireworks result in permanent blindness. During tube and aerial shell fireworks and the stability of 1999, 16 people died as a result of injuries associated with multiple-tube devices.4 fireworks. Every type of legally available consumer (so- Consumer fireworks, formerly known as “Class C” called “safe and sane”) firework has been associated with fireworks and often inappropriately referred to as serious injury or death. In 1997, 20 100 fires were caused “safe and sane” fireworks, include fountains and by fireworks, resulting in $22.7 million in direct property candles that shoot out sparks or flaming balls, rock- damage. Fireworks typically cause more fires in the ets with sticks (called “bottle rockets,” because it is United States on the Fourth of July than all other causes of fire combined on that day. Pediatricians should edu- customary to stand them in a soda bottle for igni- cate parents, children, community leaders, and others tion), other rockets, firecrackers, sparklers, and about the dangers of fireworks.
    [Show full text]
  • Fireworks FACT SHEET PUBLICATION #13 U.S
    Fireworks FACT SHEET PUBLICATION #13 U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION Fireworks Safety The American traditions of parades, cookouts, and fireworks help us celebrate the summer season, especially our nation’s birthday on the Fourth of July. However, fireworks can turn a joyful celebration into a painful memory when children and adults are injured or killed while using fireworks. Although legal consumer fireworks that comply with U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) regulations can be relatively safe when used responsibly, all fireworks, by their nature, are hazardous and can cause injuries. Fireworks are classified as hazardous substances under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA). Some fireworks, such as illegal firecracker-type devices (M-80s, quarter sticks) and professional display fireworks should never be handled by consumers, due to the risk of serious injury and death. Following are a few examples of recent deaths caused by illegal fireworks: UCT SAFE D TY O R C P O M R E M M I S U S S I O N N O C U N ES ITED STAT CPSC - FIREWORKS SAFETY FACT SHEET (800) 638-2772 • CPSC.gov • SaferProducts.gov PAGE 1 Fireworks - Related Deaths 2017-2018 • A 16-year-old male from Florida died after a mortar tube exploded in his hand on July 5, 2018. According to the police report, the victim’s cousin lit the charge of a mortar and placed it in the tube and backed away. The victim then picked up the tube and held it in his left hand. As the cousin went to tell the victim to put the tube down, the tube exploded in the victim’s hand and knocked the victim down.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Fireworks Testing Manual
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION CONSUMER FIREWORKS TESTING MANUAL Directorate for Laboratory Sciences Division of Chemistry This manual is to provide guidance to the Commission staff that test fireworks devices for compliance with fireworks regulations. This manual is not intended to supersede or limit fireworks regulations. In the case of discrepancies between this manual and the regulations, the regulations will supersede this manual. This manual has not been reviewed or approved by, and may not necessarily represent the views of, the Commission. Fourth Edition (17 August 2006) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................... 4 II. SAFETY AND EQUIPMENT................................................................................ 4 A. Safety Precautions............................................................................................. 4 B. Equipment and Supplies..................................................................................... 5 1. Field Analysis............................................................................................. 5 2. Laboratory Analysis ................................................................................... 5 C. Equipment Calibration and Accuracy................................................................. 6 D. General Fireworks Data and Testing Forms ....................................................... 6 III. SAMPLE ACCOUNTABILITY, HANDLING AND SPLITTING......................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Fireworks Annual Report
    2020 Fireworks Annual Report Fireworks-Related Deaths, Emergency Department-Treated Injuries, and Enforcement Activities During 2020 June 2021 Allison Marier Division of Hazard Analysis Directorate for Epidemiology U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission Blake Smith Division of Hazard Analysis Directorate for Epidemiology U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission Stephen Lee Office of Compliance and Field Operations U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission This analysis was prepared by CPSC staff. It has not been reviewed or approved by, and may not necessarily reflect the views of, the Commission. Executive Summary This report provides the results of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) staff’s analysis of data on non-occupational, fireworks-related deaths and injuries during calendar year 2020. The report also summarizes CPSC staff’s enforcement activities during fiscal year 2020. 1 Staff obtained information on fireworks-related deaths from news clippings and other sources in CPSC’s Consumer Product Safety Risk Management System (CPSRMS). Staff also estimated fireworks- related injuries treated in hospital emergency departments from CPSC’s National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). Finally, CPSC staff conducted a special study of non-occupational fireworks-related injuries between June 21, 2020 and July 21, 2020. The special study included collecting and analyzing more detailed incident information, such as the type of injury, the fireworks involved, the characteristics of the victim, and the incident scenario. About 66 percent of the estimated annual fireworks-related, emergency department-treated injuries for 2020 occurred during that period. Highlights of the report: Deaths and Injuries • CPSC staff received reports of 18 non-occupational fireworks-related deaths during 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • G:\Docs\Jkob\Motion Orders\American Promotional Mtn for Preliminary
    Case 1:11-cv-00242-LEK-RLP Document 25 Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 52 PageID #: <pageID> IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS, ) CIVIL NO. 11-00242 LEK-RLP INC. - NORTHWEST dba TNT ) FIREWORKS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, ) a municipal corporation, ET ) AL., ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________ ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff American Promotional Events, Inc. – Northwest, doing business as TNT Fireworks’, (“Plaintiff” or “TNT”) Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“Motion”), filed on April 11, 2011. Defendant City and County of Honolulu (“Defendant” or “City”) filed its memorandum in opposition on May 23, 2011, Plaintiff filed its supplemental memorandum in support on May 31, 2011, and Defendant filed its supplemental memorandum in opposition on June 6, 2011. This matter came on for hearing on June 13, 2011. Appearing on behalf of Plaintiff were Thomas Berger, Esq., and Robert Chapman, Esq., and appearing on behalf of Defendant were Duane Pang, Esq., Elisabeth Contrades, Esq., and Kamilla Chan, Esq. After careful consideration of the Motion, supporting and opposing memoranda, and the arguments of counsel, Plaintiff’s Motion is HEREBY DENIED Case 1:11-cv-00242-LEK-RLP Document 25 Filed 06/17/11 Page 2 of 52 PageID #: <pageID> because, in order for the Court to issue a preliminary injunction, Plaintiff must establish that it is likely to succeed on the merits, that it is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in its favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest, and this Court cannot conclude that Plaintiff has met its burden of proof for the reasons set forth below.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal and Illegal Fireworks/Explosive Devices, Revised 5/12
    WASHINGTON STATE LEGAL CONSUMER FIREWORKS FOR SALE IN TENTS AND STANDS PER RCW 70.77.136 Cylindrical Fountain Helicopters, Aerial Spinners Cone Fountain Smoke Devices Upon ignition, a shower of colored sparks, A propeller or blade is attached, which, Upon ignition, a shower of colored sparks, Tube or sphere containing pyrotechnic and sometimes a whistling effect, is upon ignition, lifts the rapidly spinning and sometimes a whistling effect, is composition that, upon ignition, produces produced. device into the air. A visible or audible produced. a white or colored smoke as a primary effect is produced at the height of flight. effect. Roman Candles Parachutes Wheels Mine/Shells/Cakes Heavy paper or cardboard tube containing Upon ignition, one or more parachutes are Pyrotechnic device attached to a post or Mine – An aerial device that shoots stars pyrotechnic composition. Upon ignition, propelled into the air with stars, smoke, tree by means of a nail or string. A wheel into the sky in an upward spray pattern. up to ten “stars” are individually expelled and other effects being discharged as the may contain up to six “driver” units; upon Shell – A shell is an aerial item that is fired at several-second intervals. parachute floats downward. ignition, the wheel revolves, producing a into the sky. shower of color and sparks and, Cake – Dense-packed collection of sometimes, a whistling effect. mine/shell tubes that are fused together. Ground Spinners Reloadable Mortars Dipped Stick, Sparkler Novelties A small device similar to a wheel in design A shell consisting of a container, a lift Stick or wire coated with pyrotechnic “Trick and Novelty Devices” means any and effect.
    [Show full text]
  • MICHIGAN FIREWORKS SAFETY ACT Act 256 of 2011 an ACT To
    MICHIGAN FIREWORKS SAFETY ACT Act 256 of 2011 AN ACT to revise, consolidate, and codify the laws relating to certain fireworks; to regulate the purchase, possession, sale, and use of certain fireworks; to establish a fireworks safety fund; to establish a fireworks safety fee; to provide for the transfer and expenditure of funds; to prescribe the powers and duties of certain state agencies; to provide for penalties and remedies; and to repeal acts and parts of acts. History: 2011, Act 256, Eff. Jan. 1, 2012. The People of the State of Michigan enact: 28.451 Short title. Sec. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Michigan fireworks safety act". History: 2011, Act 256, Eff. Jan. 1, 2012. 28.452 Definitions. Sec. 2. As used in this act: (a) "Agricultural and wildlife fireworks" means fireworks devices distributed to farmers, ranchers, and growers through a wildlife management program administered by the United States department of the interior or the department of natural resources of this state. (b) "APA standard 87-1" means 2001 APA standard 87-1, standard for construction and approval for transportation of fireworks, novelties, and theatrical pyrotechnics, published by the American pyrotechnics association of Bethesda, Maryland. (c) "Articles pyrotechnic" means pyrotechnic devices for professional use that are similar to consumer fireworks in chemical composition and construction but not intended for consumer use, that meet the weight limits for consumer fireworks but are not labeled as such, and that are classified as UN0431 or UN0432 under 49 CFR 172.101. (d) "Citation" means that term as described in section 17a.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Fireworkſ
    ✵The Art Of Fireworkſ✵. June, 2014 Eighth Grade Project Paper H. C.C.P.S Taz Oborne 1 The ſilent darkneſſ iſ all around you. But your ſurroundingſ light up when a loud noiſe followed by a ſmall ſpear of fire that ſhootſ into the faded blue ſky. Suddenly ſtreamſ of different colored lightſ ſhoot out of the path of the ſpear. The ſilent darkneſſ engulfſ you once more. In reality, there iſ no flaming ſpear, even though it may ſeem like it. It iſ juſt a firework mortar. But that doeſ not mean it iſ not intereſting. A lot of people watch and enjoy firework ſhowſ without thinking much of what actually goeſ on. Me, on the other hand, I could not ſtop myſelf from wanting to figure what waſ going on inſide the firework. How doeſ it fly? How do they make the different colorſ? How do they even put thiſ ſtuff together? If you have ever aſked yourſelf any queſtionſ about fireworkſ after watching them, then keep reading! If not, then keep reading, becauſe now you get a chance to aſk yourſelf, “How do fireworkſ, work?” That queſtion iſ what my whole project iſ baſed on. More ſpecifically, “How do firework MORTARS work?” Firework mortarſ have a charge that ſhootſ it into the air. There iſ fuſe inſide that getſ lit when the charge goeſ off. The fuſe then lightſ a ſecond charge that ſhootſ out flaming ballſ into the air. To ſtart thiſ paper, I will review ſome hiſtory of fireworkſ. Then, I will analyze the different typeſ of fireworkſ and what their uſeſ are.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Nevada Fire Chiefs Association Approved Guideline for Consumer Fireworks Written by the Southern Nevada Consumer Fireworks Code Committee
    The Southern Nevada Fire Chiefs Association Approved Guideline for Consumer Fireworks Written by the Southern Nevada Consumer Fireworks Code Committee Attachments: 1: Testing and Acceptance Procedures Southern Nevada Consumer Fireworks Code Committee Members: Amanda Wildermuth + 2 (Chairman) Clark County Fire Prevention Bureau Scott Thompson + 2 Las Vegas Fire & Rescue Andrew Lewis Las Vegas Fire & Rescue (Investigator / Bomb Squad) J.J. Johnson Henderson Building & Fire Safety Kris White North Las Vegas Fire Prevention Rick Resnick Mesquite Fire and Rescue Page 1 of 12 (This page intentionally blank) Page 2 of 12 Ratified 9/27/18 Approved Feb, 2019 Replaces: 5/13/04 TITLE: CONSUMER FIREWORKS SCOPE: To provide for the issuance of permits for the sale and storage of fireworks classified as U.N. explosive class 1.4G “consumer fireworks” (formerly class C fireworks). REFERENCE: International Fire Code (IFC), Clark County Amendments to the IFC, NFPA 1124, Code for the Manufacture, Transportation, Storage, Retail Sales of Fireworks and Pyrotechnic Articles. • The current Fire Code and / or amendments in effect for the specific jurisdiction. • Testing procedures are labeled as Attachment #1 and are based on the requirements set forth in the APA (American Pyrotechnics Association) standard 87-1 o This attachment is for the SNCFCC Only PURPOSE: To standardize Authority Having Jurisdiction requirements throughout Southern Nevada with all jurisdictions, regarding the issuance of permits for the sale, storage and use of U.N. explosive class 1.4G “consumer fireworks.” GENERAL REQUIREMENTS This handout is a guideline provided as a public service and is not intended to be a reprint of every code section which addresses this issue.
    [Show full text]