British Columbia Water Quality Guidelines for Dissolved Gas Supersaturation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Community Risk Assessment
COMMUNITY RISK ASSESSMENT Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Abstract This Community Risk Assessment is a component of the SLRD Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. A Community Risk Assessment is the foundation for any local authority emergency management program. It informs risk reduction strategies, emergency response and recovery plans, and other elements of the SLRD emergency program. Evaluating risks is a requirement mandated by the Local Authority Emergency Management Regulation. Section 2(1) of this regulation requires local authorities to prepare emergency plans that reflects their assessment of the relative risk of occurrence, and the potential impact, of emergencies or disasters on people and property. SLRD Emergency Program [email protected] Version: 1.0 Published: January, 2021 SLRD Community Risk Assessment SLRD Emergency Management Program Executive Summary This Community Risk Assessment (CRA) is a component of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District (SLRD) Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan and presents a survey and analysis of known hazards, risks and related community vulnerabilities in the SLRD. The purpose of a CRA is to: • Consider all known hazards that may trigger a risk event and impact communities of the SLRD; • Identify what would trigger a risk event to occur; and • Determine what the potential impact would be if the risk event did occur. The results of the CRA inform risk reduction strategies, emergency response and recovery plans, and other elements of the SLRD emergency program. Evaluating risks is a requirement mandated by the Local Authority Emergency Management Regulation. Section 2(1) of this regulation requires local authorities to prepare emergency plans that reflect their assessment of the relative risk of occurrence, and the potential impact, of emergencies or disasters on people and property. -
BC Hydro-Party Response
BC Hydro—Party Response A14/SEM/97-001/05/RSP DISTRIBUTION: General ORIGINAL: English EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On April 2, 1997, the Sierra Legal Defence Fund and the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund (the "submitters") made a submission under Article 14 of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC) alleging that the Government of Canada is failing to enforce its environmental law effectively. Specifically, the submission asserts that Canada fails to enforce s.35(1) of the Fisheries Act and fails to utilize its powers pursuant to s.119.06 of the National Energy Board Act to protect fish and fish habitat from damage caused by hydroelectric power generation in British Columbia by BC Hydro (BCH), a provincial Crown corporation. CANADA'S POSITION Canada supports the NAAEC process for submissions on enforcement matters, and considers Articles 14 and 15 to be among the most important provisions of the treaty. Canada submits that it is enforcing its environmental laws, and is in full compliance with its obligations under the NAAEC. Therefore, Canada submits that, in this instance, the development of a factual record is unwarranted as: · the assertions concerning the enforcement of the Fisheries Act are the subject of pending judicial or administrative proceedings within the meaning of Article 14(3)(a); · Canada is fully enforcing the environmental provisions of the Fisheries Act, and the National Energy Board (NEB) has properly exercised its power under the National Energy Board Act; · the provisions of the NAAEC cannot be applied retroactively to assertions of a failure to effectively enforce environmental laws prior to the coming into force of the NAAEC on January 1, 1994. -
Issue 103.Indd
ARCH GR SE OU E P BRITISH COLUMBIA R POST OFFICE B POSTAL HISTORY R I A IT B ISH COLUM NEWSLETTER Volume 26 Number 3 Whole number 103 September 2017 60-cent registered double-weight cover from Whalley to Nairobi, returned by dead letter office. Here’s a colourful, well-travelled cover with a lar datestamp on reverse. wealth of exotic markings to decipher. Sent from Some additional datestamps on the back of the Whalley (in Surrey) on Dec 22, 1950, it pays the 60- envelope are: New Westminster, Dec 23, 1950; Van- cent registered double airmail rate to Kenya (25c per couver, Dec 23, 1950; Montreal A.M.F., Dec 25, 1950; ¼ oz, 10c for registration), and was received at Nai- Nairobi registered, Dec 29, 1950; and Nairobi R.P.O., robi on Jan 9, 1951. Mr Athar, the addressee, could Jan ??, 1951. not be found, and the cover was marked “unknown” And the rectangular tax marking in purple on and “returned to sender” (“retour à l’envoyeur”). the front? Well, from 1922 to 1954 the dead letter of- The next set of markings, on reverse, is dated fice charged a 3-cent fee for a returned letter (which March 7, 1951, at the Montreal Dead Letter Office: would probably have arrived back in an “ambu- one is a meter impression on a piece of tape, the lance” cover). It’s quite remarkable that the cover other a “No. 12” rectangular clerk datestamp. The could be sent from Montreal on March 7 and arrive cover arrived back in New Westminster on Mar 8, at New Westminster on March 8—or is that a date- 1951, according to the small-lettered (Type C) circu- stamp error?—Andrew Scott In this issue: • Lumbering in the East Kootenays p 1019 • Favourite cover: Whalley to Kenya p 1011 • Drowned post offices, part III p 1022 • Hugh Westgate sale results at Eastern p 1013 • Scrimgeour miscellany p 1025 • The “other end of track” post office p 1015 • Recent BC post office markings p 1026 BC Postal History Newsletter #103 Page 1012 receives an inkjet cancel. -
Geohazard Risk Prioritization
SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT Geohazard Risk Prioritization FINAL April 10, 2020 Project No.: 1358007 Prepared by BGC Engineering Inc. for: Squamish-Lillooet Regional District BGC ENGINEERING INC. 500-980 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Canada V6Z 0C8 Tel: 604.684.5900 Fax: 604.684.5909 BGC ENGINEERING INC. AN APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES COMPANY Suite 500 - 980 Howe Street Vancouver, BC Canada V6Z 0C8 Telephone (604) 684-5900 Fax (604) 684-5909 April 10, 2020 Project No.: 1358007 Sarah Morgan Emergency Program Manager Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Box 219, Pemberton, BC V0N 2L0 Dear Sarah, Re: Geohazard Risk Prioritization – FINAL Please find attached the above referenced report for your review. The web application accompanying this report can be accessed at www.cambiocommunities.ca. Username and password information will be provided in a separate transmission. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. We appreciate the opportunity to collaborate with you on this challenging and interesting study. Yours sincerely, BGC ENGINEERING INC. per: Kris Holm, M.Sc., P.Geo. Principal Geoscientist Squamish-Lillooet Regional District April 10, 2020 Geohazard Risk Prioritization - FINAL Project No.: 1358007 TABLE OF REVISIONS ISSUE DATE REV REMARKS DRAFT January 31, 2020 Original issue FINAL April 10, 2020 Original issue CREDITS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS BGC Engineering would like to express gratitude to the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District (SLRD, the District) for providing background information, guidance and support throughout this project. Key SLRD staff providing leadership and support included: • Sarah Morgan, Emergency Program Manager • Ana Koterniak, GIS Coordinator. The following BGC personnel were part of the study team: • Kris Holm (Project Manager) • Sarah Kimball (Assistant Project Manager) • Richard Carter • Matthew Buchanan • Beatrice Collier-Pandya • Carie-Ann Lau • Matthieu Sturzenegger • Elisa Scordo • Patrick Grover • Philip LeSueur • Melissa Hairabedian • Alistair Beck. -
Preliminary Review of Fisheries Conservation Gains Within BC
PreliminaryPreliminary ReviewReview ofof FisheriesFisheries ConservationConservation GainsGains withinwithin BCBC Hydro’sHydro’s WaterWater UseUse PlanningPlanning ProcessProcess 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Consvr Q 30 30 46 46 46 30 20 20304046 46 Present Q 21.9 31.8 32.0 28.9 24.2 14.3 11.1 5.6 8.5 15.8 35.2 36.5 Nat Q 113 106 91 105 130 11465 28 48116 144 141 atershed Prepared for: Watershed Watch Salmon Society Watch Prepared by: Quadra Planning Consultants Ltd., and Regional Consulting Ltd. & Linda Nolan (LL) Funded by: The Bullitt Foundation May 2004 SALMONW SOCIETY year), and though the full benefits of the labor- and cash-intensive PREFACE ($25 million by government alone) process won’t be known for years, Watershed Watch believes it is time to report on the 24 water THE SUCCESSFUL MANAGEMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA’S use plans that have been completed or are near completion. freshwater resources requires overcoming a wide range of obsta- Since Watershed Watch supports legitimate processes that cles. In their superb yet sobering examination of adaptive improve our measuring and management of water, Watershed capacity and challenges to policy within three dozen manage- Watch has been extremely active in the past four years, participat- ment agencies, systems ecologists Buzz Holling and Lance ing in the Coquitlam-Buntzen water use planning consultative Gunderson have identified a remarkably predictable “manage- committee, the Coquitlam fish technical committee, the First ment pathology.” With few exceptions, management agencies, in Nations water use planning committee, the fisheries advisory their drive for efficiency, and to preserve (initially) successful team on water use planning, the green hydro working group, and policies and development, become progressively more myopic numerous other academic, technical, and informal meetings. -
Water for Power, Water for Nature the Story of BC Hydro’S Water Use Planning Program Front Cover: Sockeye Salmon in the Lower Adams River
Water for Power, Water for Nature The Story of BC Hydro’s Water Use Planning Program Front cover: sockeye salmon in the lower Adams River. © Andrew S. Wright / WWF-Canada Published in October 2014 James Mattison, Linda Nowlan, WWF-Canada, Mathieu Lebel, WWF-Canada, Craig Orr, Watershed Watch Salmon Society Recommended citation: Mattison, J., et al. (2014). Water for Power, Water for Nature: The Story of BC Hydro’s Water Use Planning Program. Vancouver: WWF Canada. Acknowledgements: The authors wish to thank all the current and former staff of BC Hydro, and government agencies, particularly the BC Ministry of the Environment and Fisheries and Oceans Canada, for their willingness to supply information and answer questions, and review the report. For many of them, there was not only a willingness to supply information but an obvious pride in their accomplishments and a desire for us to get this right. This report could not have been written without that information and assistance. The authors also wish to thank the people who gave their time to review and comment on this report: Mike Bradford, Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Adam Lewis, Ecofish Research Ltd.; Denise Dalmer, formerly Director Energy Policy and Project Assessment, Ministry of Energy and Mines, British Columbia; and Tony Maas and James Casey, WWF-Canada. Any errors or omissions are attributable to the authors. This publication is funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. WWF thanks the Foundation for their financial support that made this work possible. © 1986 Panda symbol WWF-World Wide Fund For Nature (formerly known as World Wildlife Fund).