Functions of Drosophila Pak (P21-Activated Kinase) in Morphogenesis: a Mechanistic Model Based on Cellular, Molecular, and Genetic Studies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Functions of Drosophila Pak (p21-activated kinase) in Morphogenesis: A Mechanistic Model based on Cellular, Molecular, and Genetic Studies Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Lewis, Sara Ann Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 10:07:41 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/594389 FUNCTIONS OF DROSOPHILA PAK (P21-ACTIVATED KINASE) IN MORPHOGENESIS: A MECHANISTIC MODEL BASED ON CELLULAR, MOLECULAR, AND GENETIC STUDIES by Sara Lewis A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the GRADUATE INTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAM in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN NEUROSCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2015 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Sara Lewis, titled “Functions of Drosophila Pak (p21-activated kinase) in morphogenesis: a mechanistic model based on cellular, molecular and genetic studies” and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________________________________________________ Date: November 18, 2015 Dr. Linda Restifo _______________________________________________________________________ Date: November 18, 2015 Dr. Jean Wilson _______________________________________________________________________ Date: November 18, 2015 Dr. Konrad Zinsmaier _______________________________________________________________________ Date: November 18, 2015 Dr. Lynne Oland Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement. ________________________________________________ Date: November 18, 2015 Dissertation Director: Dr. Alan Nighorn 2 Statement by Author This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that an accurate acknowledgement of the source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. ________________________________________________ SIGNED: Sara Lewis 3 Acknowledgements I am grateful to numerous undergraduates and other students who assisted with this research, both directly and indirectly, over the years: Monica Chaung, Adrian Ostertag, Aubrey Downey, Allegra Cohen, Cori Schwartzlow, Cecilia Brown, Rachel Doser, and Grace Samtani. I especially appreciate the hard work of Lauren O’Neill and Josh Paree in immunostaining, morphological analysis, NeuronMetrics, and fly rearing. Many thanks to Judith Tello for years of support as my peer and friend. Thank you to Jennifer Tifft and William Lewis for editing help on this thesis. I would like to express my appreciation to Anna Burns for tissue culture training and Patty Jansma for outstanding microscopy assistance and knowledge. I am forever indebted to the expertise and mentoring of Dave Andrew and Robert Kraft. Thank you for all of your training, feedback, and support to help me develop as a scientist. I would like to thank the members of my committee: Lynne Oland, Jean Wilson, Konrad Zinsmaier, and Alan Nighorn. I appreciate your advice and the numerous ways you supported my research over the years. I am also grateful to the GIDP in Neuroscience for funding and support and to all of the students and faculty who made graduate school such a rich learning opportunity. Finally, I would like to thank my mentor, Linda Restifo, for constantly challenging me. I am grateful to my husband, William Lewis, for constant support and encouragement. 4 Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures ............................................................................................................................. 7 Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 List of abbreviations ................................................................................................................................... 10 Chapter I: Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 11 Morphogenesis is the genetically-regulated process of changing tissue shape to form body structures ............................................................................................................................... 11 Intellectual disability, microcephaly, and PAK3 ............................................................................ 13 PAK3 regulates proteins that stabilize the actin cytoskeleton ....................................................... 16 Rodent and Drosophila models of PAK3 ....................................................................................... 19 Drosophila mushroom bodies are higher-order brain structures whose morphology is genetically regulated ..................................................................................................................... 23 Non-muscle myosins have diverse, critical roles in morphology and nervous system physiology ...................................................................................................................................... 25 Statement of problem addressed in dissertation ............................................................................. 27 Chapter II: Selective regulation of appendage and mushroom body morphogenesis by Drosophila Pak (p21-activated kinase) ................................................................................................................................. 31 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 32 5 Results ............................................................................................................................................ 35 Discussion ...................................................................................................................................... 42 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................................... 48 Figures and Legends ...................................................................................................................... 54 Chapter III: Pak (p21-activated kinase) regulates neurite arbor size and brain structure morphology with apparent roles in branch stability and inhibition of myosin regulatory light chain phosphorylation .......... 68 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 68 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 69 Results ............................................................................................................................................ 72 Discussion ...................................................................................................................................... 79 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................................... 83 Figures and Legends ...................................................................................................................... 89 Chapter IV: Summary and Future directions ............................................................................................ 101 Appendix A: Cofilin (twinstar) and Pak interact to regulate neurite branches, but not total neurite length in vitro ....................................................................................................................................................... 106 References ................................................................................................................................................. 110 6 List of Tables and Figures Table 1: Human mutations in PAK3, protein products and function ......................................................... 29 Table 2: Antibodies used for immunolabeling ........................................................................................... 49 Fig. 1: Pak molecular signaling