DOCSLIB.ORG

Seeing Red: Analyzing IUCN Red List Data of South and Southeast Asian Amphibians Alexandra Gonzalez [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seeing Red: Analyzing IUCN Red List Data of South and Southeast Asian Amphibians Alexandra Gonzalez Angonzalez@Usfca.Edu The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Master's Theses Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects Spring 5-18-2018 Seeing Red: Analyzing IUCN Red List Data of South and Southeast Asian Amphibians Alexandra Gonzalez [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/thes Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Gonzalez, Alexandra, "Seeing Red: Analyzing IUCN Red List Data of South and Southeast Asian Amphibians" (2018). Master's Theses. 1090. https://repository.usfca.edu/thes/1090 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. González 1 THESIS SEEING RED: ANALYZING IUCN RED LIST DATA OF SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIAN AMPHIBIANS Submitted by Alexandra González Department of Biology, University of San Francisco In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science University of San Francisco San Francisco, California 2018 Committee: Advisor: Dr. Jennifer Dever Dr. Patricia Francis-Lyon Dr. Naupaka Zimmerman González 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS To my committee members, Dr. Patricia Francis-Lyon and Dr. Naupaka Zimmerman, thank you for guiding me and for inspiring me to increase my technical abilities. I could not have done this without your support. To my advisor, Dr. Jennifer Dever, thank you for always believing in me and for bringing out the best in me. Your dedication to your work and commitment to your students have made a difference in my life. González 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………..……….6 Amphibian life history traits………………………………..………………………………………..7 Southeast Asia…………………………………………………...………………………………………….8 Threatening Processes: Southeast Asian Amphibian Threats……………………….……………………...9 Threatening Processes: Global Amphibian Threats…………………………...…………………….…… 10 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species…………………………………….…………………................... 13 Purpose…………………………………………………………………………..……………………..… 15 II. Materials and Methods………………………………………………..………………. 16 Threat Data Acquisition…………….…………………..………………………………………...16 Threat Data Analyses….………………………………..………………………………………...17 Threat Data Spatial Mapping……..………………………………………………………………19 III. Results……………………………………………………………………………………..21 Threat Data Analyses ……………………………………………………………………………………...21 Threat Data Spatial Mapping …………………….………………………………………………35 IV. Discussion …………………………………………………………………………..……41 Future Directions ……………………………………….……………………………………......44 V. Concluding Remarks ………………………………………………………..………….44 References………………………………………………………………………………….………….46 Appendix I: Increasing the Accessibility to Red List Threat Data …………..….50 Appendix II: Reclassifying Red List Categories ….…………….…….……..……….60 Appendix III: Hierarchical Clustering of Red List Threats ….…………….…….60 Appendix IV: Threat Data…………….………………….………………………………..61 Appendix V: Scripted Code ………….…….…………….………………………………..62 González 4 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Global amphibians, number of threats by Red List Category…………………………………….………..22 Figure 2: Global amphibians, Density Distribution of the number of threats by Red List Category………….…….23 Figure 3: Global amphibians, Total number of threat codes of Threatened (Critically Endangered, ………….……24 Endangered, Vulnerable) and Not Threatened (Least Concern, Near Threatened) amphibians Figure 4: Threats affecting Least Concern, Global Amphibians ……………………………………………………25 Figure 5: Threats affecting Near Threatened, Global amphibians ……………………………………..……………25 Figure 6: Threats affecting Vulnerable, Global amphibians ……………………………………...…………………25 Figure 7: Threats affecting Endangered, Global amphibians ………………………………………….……………25 Figure 8: Threats affecting Critically Endangered, Global amphibians …………………………….………………25 Figure 9: South and Southeast Asian amphibians, Red List Category by Threat Count …………..………………..26 Figure 10: Density Distribution of South and Southeast Asian amphibians, Red List Category by Threat Count …27 Figure 11: South and Southeast Asian amphibians, Total number of threat codes of Threatened (Critically ………28 Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable) and Not Threatened (Least Concern, Near Threatened) amphibians. Figure 12: SE Asian amphibian threat totals, Least Concern ……………………………………………….………29 Figure 13: SE Asian amphibian threat totals, Near Threatened ……………………………………….…………….29 Figure 14: SE Asian amphibian threat totals, Vulnerable …………………………………...………………………29 Figure 15: SE Asian amphibian threat totals, Endangered ……………………………….…………………………29 Figure 16: SE Asian amphibian threat totals, Critically Endangered ………………………………………….……29 Figure 17: Species assessment year by Red List status. (Blue = Least Concern, Purple = Near Threatened, ...….…30 Pink = Vulnerable, Orange = Critically Endangered, Yellow = Data Deficient, Green = Endangered. Figure 18: Threat Score count by Threatened vs. Not Threatened category. ………….……………………………30 Figure 19: Figure 19: Correlation Heatmap of Threat Processes ……………………………………………………31 Map 1: Vulnerable amphibian distribution in Southeast Asia. ………………………………………………….......36 Map 2: Endangered amphibian distribution in Southeast Asia………………………………………………………36 Map 3: Threatened amphibians (Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable) distribution. ……….…………..36 Map 4: Species with a listed threat of Agriculture 2.1, in the Philippines ……………………………........………..37 Map 5: Species with a listed threat of Agriculture 2.2 in Borneo…………………………………………....………37 Map 6: Distribution of species that are being hunted and collected…………………………………………………37 Map 7: Species threatened by mining………………………………………………………………………………. 39 Map 8: Species threatened by human disturbances. …………………………………………………………………39 Map 9: Species threatened by Invasive non-native species/diseases……………………………………………….. 39 Map 10: Species threatened by Fire and fire suppression (includes threats of all timing)…………………………. 40 Map 11: Close up of species threatened by Fire and Figure suppression (includes threats of all timing)………...... 40 Map 12: Species threatened by residential and commercial development in Mindanao Islands, Philippines……… 41 Map 13: Species threatened by residential and commercial development in Borneo………………………………. 41 TABLE OF TABLES Table 1: Logistic Regression results #1……………………………………………………………………………...32 Table 2: Logistic Regression results #2……………………………………………………………………………...34 González 5 Abstract In the midst of the sixth mass extinction event which is currently underway, it appears that amphibians are one of the most impacted vertebrates. Over 6,500 amphibian species are listed on the IUCN Red List (an assessment tool which provides species’ conservation status, perceived threats, and distribution range). While it is well-known that populations under multiple stressors are more likely to undergo significant declines, there are little to no resources available for visualizing how these threats may work synergistically and interact within a species’ range. This is especially the case for Southeast Asian amphibians, which much less attention has been paid as compared to other parts of the globe. While the IUCN Red List provides a description of threats affecting species and categorizes species into Red List Categories (Least Concern, Near Threatened, Vulnerable, Endangered, Critically Endangered), this data is not easily accessible for wide-scale analyses. The aims of this project were as follows: (1) utilize bioinformatics to increase accessibility to IUCN Red List data, (2) analyze the IUCN data repository to identify trends in South and South East Asian amphibian threat data, and (3) plot IUCN threat data. I. INTRODUCTION Plagued by anthropogenic-induced activity, disease, and other threats, amphibian populations have been declining for decades, signaling a modern biodiversity crisis. These biodiversity losses are more than just declines, however. They are indicative of the 6th mass extinction that is currently underway (McCallum 2015). The current extinction rate for endangered amphibians ranges between 25,039-45,474 times the background extinction rate González 6 (McCallum 2007). Other models estimate the extinction rate at four orders-of-magnitude higher than the background extinction rate (Alroy 2015). Extinction rates may be greater than these models suggest, however, because single-threat drivers of extinction are often considered instead of synergetic threats (Brook et al. 2008). When the effects of multiple threat processes are considered, the overall risk of extinction is greater than previously speculated (Brook et al. 2008). Approximately 32.4% of amphibian species are threatened with extinction (Stuart 2004), representing 2,030 species (IUCN 2017). While 1/3 of amphibians are threatened with extinction, as many as 22.5% do not have sufficient data for their Red List Category to be characterized. On the IUCN Red List, these species are listed as Data Deficient (DD) and as of the 2017 IUCN update, 191 species (52.5%) of the 366 species added to the database in 2008 were DD. Current mathematical models strongly suggest that DD species are more likely to face extinction than documented amphibians (Howard et al. 2014). While the 6th mass extinction threatens all life, it seems as though amphibian
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SDG Indicator Metadata (Harmonized Metadata Template - Format Version 1.0)
    Last updated: 4 January 2021 SDG indicator metadata (Harmonized metadata template - format version 1.0) 0. Indicator information 0.a. Goal Goal 15: Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss 0.b. Target Target 15.5: Take urgent and significant action to reduce the degradation of natural habitats, halt the loss of biodiversity and, by 2020, protect and prevent the extinction of threatened species 0.c. Indicator Indicator 15.5.1: Red List Index 0.d. Series 0.e. Metadata update 4 January 2021 0.f. Related indicators Disaggregations of the Red List Index are also of particular relevance as indicators towards the following SDG targets (Brooks et al. 2015): SDG 2.4 Red List Index (species used for food and medicine); SDG 2.5 Red List Index (wild relatives and local breeds); SDG 12.2 Red List Index (impacts of utilisation) (Butchart 2008); SDG 12.4 Red List Index (impacts of pollution); SDG 13.1 Red List Index (impacts of climate change); SDG 14.1 Red List Index (impacts of pollution on marine species); SDG 14.2 Red List Index (marine species); SDG 14.3 Red List Index (reef-building coral species) (Carpenter et al. 2008); SDG 14.4 Red List Index (impacts of utilisation on marine species); SDG 15.1 Red List Index (terrestrial & freshwater species); SDG 15.2 Red List Index (forest-specialist species); SDG 15.4 Red List Index (mountain species); SDG 15.7 Red List Index (impacts of utilisation) (Butchart 2008); and SDG 15.8 Red List Index (impacts of invasive alien species) (Butchart 2008, McGeoch et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Critically Endangered - Wikipedia
    Critically endangered - Wikipedia Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Critically endangered From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page Contents This article is about the conservation designation itself. For lists of critically endangered species, see Lists of IUCN Red List Critically Endangered Featured content species. Current events A critically endangered (CR) species is one which has been categorized by the International Union for Random article Conservation status Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild.[1] Donate to Wikipedia by IUCN Red List category Wikipedia store As of 2014, there are 2464 animal and 2104 plant species with this assessment, compared with 1998 levels of 854 and 909, respectively.[2] Interaction Help As the IUCN Red List does not consider a species extinct until extensive, targeted surveys have been About Wikipedia conducted, species which are possibly extinct are still listed as critically endangered. IUCN maintains a list[3] Community portal of "possibly extinct" CR(PE) and "possibly extinct in the wild" CR(PEW) species, modelled on categories used Recent changes by BirdLife International to categorize these taxa. Contact page Contents Tools Extinct 1 International Union for Conservation of Nature definition What links here Extinct (EX) (list) 2 See also Related changes Extinct in the Wild (EW) (list) 3 Notes Upload file Threatened Special pages 4 References Critically Endangered (CR) (list) Permanent
    [Show full text]
  • Blue–Spotted Salamander Ambystoma Laterale Status: Wisconsin – Common Minnesota – Common Iowa – Endangered
    Species Descriptions Blue–spotted Salamander Ambystoma laterale Status: Wisconsin – Common Minnesota – Common Iowa – Endangered 1 cm Size at hatching, 8 – 10 mm total length; at metamorphosis, ~ 34 mm snout–vent length The Blue-spotted Salamander is one of four mole salamanders in our region. Other mole salamanders include the Spotted, Small-mouthed, and Tiger Salamanders. As adults, mole salamanders live under cover objects such as rotting logs or in burrows in the forest floor (Parmelee 1993). In early spring (March and April), adults migrate to temporary ponds to breed. Larvae develop during spring and summer and usually metamorphose in the fall. The Blue-spotted Salamander is a woodland species of northern North America. The eggs are laid in small clumps (7–40 eggs) attached to vegetation or debris at the bottom of ponds. The larvae are similar to Spotted Salamanders but are more darkly colored with the fins mottled with black, and dark blotches on the dorsum. Blue-spotted Salamanders metamorphose at about the same size as Spotted Salamanders but are darker, sometimes with flecks of blue. 14 15 Spotted Salamander Ambystoma maculatum Status: Wisconsin – Locally abundant Minnesota – Status to be determined 1 cm Size at hatching, 12 – 17 mm; at metamorphosis, 49 – 60 mm total length The Spotted Salamander is present only in the northeastern part of our range (where it is sympatric with up to two other mole salamanders). Females deposit eggs in a firm oval mass (60–100 mm in diameter) attached to vegetation near the surface of the water. The eggs (1–250 per mass) are black, but the egg mass may be clear or milky, with a greenish hue because of symbiotic algae.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotted Salamander (Ambystoma Maculafum)
    Spotted Salamander (Ambystoma maculafum) RANGE: Nova Scotia and the Gaspe Peninsula to s. On- BREEDINGPERIOD: March to mid-April. Mass breeding tario, s. through Wisconsin, s. Illinois excluding prairie migrations occur in this species: individuals enter and regions, toe. Kansas andTexas, and through the Eastern leave breeding ponds using the same track each year, United States, except Florida, the Delmarva Peninsula, and exhibit fidelity to breeding ponds (Shoop 1956, and s. New Jersey. 1974). Individuals may not breed in consecutive years (Husting 1965). Breeding migrations occur during RELATIVE ABUNDANCEIN NEW ENGLAND:Common steady evening rainstorms. though populations declining, probably due to acid pre- cipitation. EGG DEPOSITION:1 to 6 days after first appearance of adults at ponds (Bishop 1941 : 114). HABITAT:Fossorial; found in moist woods, steambanks, beneath stones, logs, boards. Prefers deciduous or NO. EGGS/MASS:100 to 200 eggs, average of 125, laid in mixed woods on rocky hillsides and shallow woodland large masses of jelly, sometimes milky, attached to stems ponds or marshy pools that hold water through the sum- about 15 cm (6 inches) under water. Each female lays 1 to mer for breeding. Usually does not inhabit ponds con- 10 masses (average of 2 to 3) of eggs (Wright and Allen taining fish (Anderson 1967a). Terrestrial hibernator. In 1909).Woodward (1982)reported that females breeding summer often wanders far from water source. Found in in permanent ponds produced smaller, more numerous low oak-hickory forests with creeks and nearby swamps eggs than females using temporary ponds. in Illinois (Cagle 1942, cited in Smith 1961 :30).
    [Show full text]
  • Heterotrophic Carbon Fixation in a Salamander-Alga Symbiosis
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.14.948299; this version posted February 18, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Heterotrophic Carbon Fixation in a Salamander-Alga Symbiosis. John A. Burns1,2, Ryan Kerney3, Solange Duhamel1,4 1Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Division of Biology and Paleo Environment, Palisades, NY 2Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, East Boothbay, ME 3Gettysburg College, Biology, Gettysburg, PA 4University of Arizona, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Tucson, AZ Abstract The unique symbiosis between a vertebrate salamander, Ambystoma maculatum, and unicellular green alga, Oophila amblystomatis, involves multiple modes of interaction. These include an ectosymbiotic interaction where the alga colonizes the egg capsule, and an intracellular interaction where the alga enters tissues and cells of the salamander. One common interaction in mutualist photosymbioses is the transfer of photosynthate from the algal symbiont to the host animal. In the A. maculatum-O. amblystomatis interaction, there is conflicting evidence regarding whether the algae in the egg capsule transfer chemical energy captured during photosynthesis to the developing salamander embryo. In experiments where we took care to separate the carbon fixation contributions of the salamander embryo and algal symbionts, we show that inorganic carbon fixed by A. maculatum embryos reaches 2% of the inorganic carbon fixed by O. amblystomatis algae within an egg capsule after 2 hours in the light.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Chordate Larvae Donald I Williamson* Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom
    lopmen ve ta e l B Williamson, Cell Dev Biol 2012, 1:1 D io & l l o l g DOI: 10.4172/2168-9296.1000101 e y C Cell & Developmental Biology ISSN: 2168-9296 Research Article Open Access The Origins of Chordate Larvae Donald I Williamson* Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom Abstract The larval transfer hypothesis states that larvae originated as adults in other taxa and their genomes were transferred by hybridization. It contests the view that larvae and corresponding adults evolved from common ancestors. The present paper reviews the life histories of chordates, and it interprets them in terms of the larval transfer hypothesis. It is the first paper to apply the hypothesis to craniates. I claim that the larvae of tunicates were acquired from adult larvaceans, the larvae of lampreys from adult cephalochordates, the larvae of lungfishes from adult craniate tadpoles, and the larvae of ray-finned fishes from other ray-finned fishes in different families. The occurrence of larvae in some fishes and their absence in others is correlated with reproductive behavior. Adult amphibians evolved from adult fishes, but larval amphibians did not evolve from either adult or larval fishes. I submit that [1] early amphibians had no larvae and that several families of urodeles and one subfamily of anurans have retained direct development, [2] the tadpole larvae of anurans and urodeles were acquired separately from different Mesozoic adult tadpoles, and [3] the post-tadpole larvae of salamanders were acquired from adults of other urodeles. Reptiles, birds and mammals probably evolved from amphibians that never acquired larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Lagenodelphis Hosei – Fraser's Dolphin
    Lagenodelphis hosei – Fraser’s Dolphin Assessment Rationale The species is suspected to be widespread and abundant and there have been no reported population declines or major threats identified that could cause a range-wide decline. Globally, it has been listed as Least Concern and, within the assessment region, it is not a conservation priority and therefore, the regional change from Data Deficient to Least Concern reflects the lack of major threats to the species. The most prominent threat to this species globally may be incidental capture in fishing gear and, although this is not considered a major threat to this species in the assessment region, Fraser’s Dolphins have become entangled in anti-shark nets off South Africa’s east coast. This threat should be monitored. Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern Regional population effects: Fraser’s Dolphin has a widespread, pantropical distribution, and although its National Red List status (2004) Data Deficient seasonal migration patterns in southern Africa remain Reasons for change Non-genuine change: inconclusive, no barriers to dispersal have been New information recognised, thus rescue effects are possible. Global Red List status (2012) Least Concern TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) None Distribution The distribution of L. hosei is suggested to be pantropical CITES listing (2003) Appendix II (Robison & Craddock 1983), and is widespread across the Endemic No Pacific and Atlantic Oceans (Ross 1984), and the species has been documented in the Indian Ocean off South This species is occasionally Africa’s east coast (Perrin et al. 1973), in Sri Lanka misidentified as the Striped Dolphin (Stenella (Leatherwood & Reeves 1989), Madagascar (Perrin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibiaweb's Illustrated Amphibians of the Earth
    AmphibiaWeb's Illustrated Amphibians of the Earth Created and Illustrated by the 2020-2021 AmphibiaWeb URAP Team: Alice Drozd, Arjun Mehta, Ash Reining, Kira Wiesinger, and Ann T. Chang This introduction to amphibians was written by University of California, Berkeley AmphibiaWeb Undergraduate Research Apprentices for people who love amphibians. Thank you to the many AmphibiaWeb apprentices over the last 21 years for their efforts. Edited by members of the AmphibiaWeb Steering Committee CC BY-NC-SA 2 Dedicated in loving memory of David B. Wake Founding Director of AmphibiaWeb (8 June 1936 - 29 April 2021) Dave Wake was a dedicated amphibian biologist who mentored and educated countless people. With the launch of AmphibiaWeb in 2000, Dave sought to bring the conservation science and basic fact-based biology of all amphibians to a single place where everyone could access the information freely. Until his last day, David remained a tirelessly dedicated scientist and ally of the amphibians of the world. 3 Table of Contents What are Amphibians? Their Characteristics ...................................................................................... 7 Orders of Amphibians.................................................................................... 7 Where are Amphibians? Where are Amphibians? ............................................................................... 9 What are Bioregions? ..................................................................................10 Conservation of Amphibians Why Save Amphibians? .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Theloderma Lateriticum Bain, Nguyen Et Doan, 2009 (Anura Rhacophoridae) from China with Redescribed Morphology
    Biodiversity Journal, 2019, 10 (1): 25–36 https://doi.org/10.31396/Biodiv.Jour.2019.10.1.25.36 First record of Theloderma lateriticum Bain, Nguyen et Doan, 2009 (Anura Rhacophoridae) from China with redescribed morphology Weicai Chen1,2*, Xiaowen Liao3, Shichu Zhou3 & Yunming Mo3 1Key Laboratory of Beibu Gulf Environment Change and Resources Utilization of Ministry of Education, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China 2Guangxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Intelligent Simulation, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China 3Natural History Museum of Guangxi, Nanning 530012, China *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Theloderma lateriticum Bain, Nguyen et Doan, 2009 (Anura Rhacophoridae) is recorded for the first time outside of Vietnam. The new locality record is from Shiwandashan National Nature Reserve, southern Guangxi, China, adjoining to Vietnam. We complemented and im- proved the morphological characters, including tadpole’s morphology and advertisement calls. KEY WORDS Theloderma lateriticum; new national record; distribution; southern China. Received 26.01.2019; accepted 05.03.2019; published online 28.03.2019 INTRODUCTION these specimens displayed high genetic variation, ranging from 0.5 to 4.9 based on combined se- Theloderma lateriticum Bain, Nguyen et quences of 12S rRNA, tRNAval, and 16S rRNA Doan, 2009 (Anura Rhacophoridae) was de- yielded a total of 2412 bp positions (Nguyen et scribed based on a single specimen (Voucher no. al., 2015). AMNH 168757/IEBR A. 0860, adult male). The In 2017, we carried out the monitoring of am- type locality is the Hoang Lien Mountains, Lao phibians at Shiwandashan National Nature Cai Province, northwestern Vietnam, between Reserve, Guangxi, China (21.844043° - N, 107.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Pathology of Amphibian Ranaviruses
    Vol. 87: 243–266, 2009 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published December 3 doi: 10.3354/dao02138 Dis Aquat Org OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS REVIEW Ecology and pathology of amphibian ranaviruses Matthew J. Gray1,*, Debra L. Miller1, 2, Jason T. Hoverman1 1274 Ellington Plant Sciences Building, Center for Wildlife Health, Department of Forestry Wildlife and Fisheries, Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-4563, USA 2Veterinary Diagnostic and Investigational Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, 43 Brighton Road, Tifton, Georgia 31793, USA ABSTRACT: Mass mortality of amphibians has occurred globally since at least the early 1990s from viral pathogens that are members of the genus Ranavirus, family Iridoviridae. The pathogen infects multiple amphibian hosts, larval and adult cohorts, and may persist in herpetofaunal and oste- ichthyan reservoirs. Environmental persistence of ranavirus virions outside a host may be several weeks or longer in aquatic systems. Transmission occurs by indirect and direct routes, and includes exposure to contaminated water or soil, casual or direct contact with infected individuals, and inges- tion of infected tissue during predation, cannibalism, or necrophagy. Some gross lesions include swelling of the limbs or body, erythema, swollen friable livers, and hemorrhage. Susceptible amphi- bians usually die from chronic cell death in multiple organs, which can occur within a few days fol- lowing infection or may take several weeks. Amphibian species differ in their susceptibility to rana- viruses, which may be related to their co-evolutionary history with the pathogen. The occurrence of recent widespread amphibian population die-offs from ranaviruses may be an interaction of sup- pressed and naïve host immunity, anthropogenic stressors, and novel strain introduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Animals – Spotted Salamander
    Massachusetts Animals – Spotted Salamander Facts at a Glance TYPE OF ANIMAL Amphibian SCIENTIFIC NAME Ambystoma maculatum FOUND WHERE Eastern United States from Maine to South Carolina HEIGHT/LENGTH 6 – 10 in. long (15 – 25 cm) WEIGHT Average about 120 – 200 g, Females often bigger than males CONSERVATION STATUS Least Concern Easily characterized by their deep brown or black skin dotted with trademark yellow and orange toned spots along the back and sides. As amphibians, they have smooth and glossy skin, not scales, and live in damp areas close to ponds and vernal pools. Their appearance varies through their life cycles, starting at a dull greenish color with external, frilly gills as a hatchling and eventually growing into their classic spots. Despite the fact that these salamanders are quite widespread, they are often elusive and hard to find. They like to hide underground or beneath rocks, logs, and fallen root systems. HABITAT LIFE & BEHAVIOUR Spotted Salamanders are commonly found Spotted salamanders start their lives in water as small across Massachusetts and all along the eastern nymphs with external gills. Mothers lay their eggs in coast of the United States, even into parts of early spring, often at the same time and location year eastern Canada. They live in forested areas, after year. After a few weeks, more than 200 eggs will typically found close to water sources like hatch and grow into juveniles. Juvenile salamanders ponds, wetlands, and seasonal, vernal pools. live in water until they grow into adult size, then move They enjoy damp and hidden environments. onto land, where they can live for about 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Appropriate Uses of Iucn Red List Data
    GUIDELINES FOR APPROPRIATE USES OF IUCN RED LIST DATA Incorporating, as Annexes, the 1) Guidelines for Reporting on Proportion Threatened (ver. 1.1); 2) Guidelines on Scientific Collecting of Threatened Species (ver. 1.0); and 3) Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of the IUCN Red List by Business (ver. 1.0) Version 3.0 (October 2016) Citation: IUCN. 2016. Guidelines for appropriate uses of IUCN Red List Data. Incorporating, as Annexes, the 1) Guidelines for Reporting on Proportion Threatened (ver. 1.1); 2) Guidelines on Scientific Collecting of Threatened Species (ver. 1.0); and 3) Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of the IUCN Red List by Business (ver. 1.0). Version 3.0. Adopted by the IUCN Red List Committee. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ GUIDELINES FOR APPROPRIATE USES OF RED LIST DATA The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is the world’s most comprehensive data resource on the status of species, containing information and status assessments on over 80,000 species of animals, plants and fungi. As well as measuring the extinction risk faced by each species, the IUCN Red List includes detailed species-specific information on distribution, threats, conservation measures, and other relevant factors. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is increasingly used by scientists, governments, NGOs, businesses, and civil society for a wide variety of purposes. These Guidelines are designed to encourage and facilitate the use of IUCN Red List data and information to tackle a broad range of important conservation issues. These Guidelines give a brief introduction to The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ (hereafter called the IUCN Red List), the Red List Categories and Criteria, and the Red List Assessment process, followed by some key facts that all Red List users need to know to maximally take advantage of this resource.
    [Show full text]