DOCSLIB.ORG

Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Office

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Office Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Office Environmental Notification Form For Office Use Only EEA#: MEPA Analyst: The information requested on this form must be completed in order to submit a document electronically for review under the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00. Project Name: Monatiquot River Restoration Street Address: Hancock Street and Plain Street Municipality: Braintree Watershed: Boston Harbor Universal Transverse Mercator Latitude: 42.198310 Coordinates: Longitude: -71.003542 334,584.25 E 4,673,737.82 N; UTMZ 19T Estimated commencement date: Estimated completion date: July 2022 June 2021 (in-water work estimated completion date: March 2022) Project Type: River Restoration Status of project design: 60 %complete Proponent: Town of Braintree, in cooperation with Hollingsworth Pond, LLC. Street Address: 1 John F. Kennedy Memorial Drive Municipality: Braintree State: MA Zip Code: 02184 Name of Contact Person: Matthew Sanford Firm/Agency: Milone & MacBroom, Inc. Street Address: 99 Realty Drive Municipality: Cheshire State: CT Zip Code: 06410 Phone: (203) 271-1773 Fax: E-mail: [email protected] Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)? Yes No If this is an Expanded Environmental Notification Form (ENF) (see 301 CMR 11.05(7)) or a Notice of Project Change (NPC), are you requesting: a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8)) Yes No a Special Review Procedure? (see 301CMR 11.09) Yes No a Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) Yes No a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) Yes No (Note: Greenhouse Gas Emissions analysis must be included in the Expanded ENF.) Which MEPA review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03)? 301 CMR 11.03(3)(a)4., structural alteration of an existing dam that causes an expansion of 20% or decrease in impoundment capacity, 301 CMR 11.03(3)(b)1.b., alteration of 500 or more linear feet of bank along a fish run or inland bank, 301 CMR 11.03(3)(b)1.e., new fill or structure or expansion of existing fill or structure, except pile-supported structure, in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway; 301 CMR 11.03(3)(b)1.f., alteration of ½ or more acres of any other wetlands. Which State Agency Permits will the project require? Ecological Restoration Order of Conditions; Combined 401 Water Quality Certification & Chapter 91 Dredge Permit; Chapter 91 Waterways License; Chapter 253 Dam Safety Permit; DMF Fishway Construction Permit Effective January 2011 Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an Agency of the Commonwealth, including the Agency name and the amount of funding or land area in acres: State funding has supported the design and permitting efforts and is anticipated to support future construction activities. State funding allocated to date includes: MA Dam & Seawall Repair or Removal Grant program: $75,000 MA Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness Program: $90,000 MA Division of Ecological Restoration: $80,000 Summary of Project Size Existing Change Total & Environmental Impacts LAND Total site acreage 13.9 acres New acres of land altered 0.45 acres Acres of impervious area 6.9 acres -0.1 acres 6.8 acres Square feet of new bordering vegetated wetlands alteration * Net change in BVW. BVW will be created +3.53 acres through conversion of LUW. See Supplemental Information Report Section 6.0 for details. Square feet of new other wetland alteration Net change in LUW. LUW will be converted to BVW. See -3.40 acres Supplemental Information Report Section 6.0 for details. Acres of new non-water dependent use of N/A tidelands or waterways STRUCTURES Gross square footage N/A N/A N/A Number of housing units N/A N/A N/A Maximum height (feet) N/A N/A N/A TRANSPORTATION Vehicle trips per day N/A N/A N/A Parking spaces N/A N/A N/A WASTEWATER Water Use (Gallons per day) N/A N/A N/A Water withdrawal (GPD) N/A N/A N/A Wastewater generation/treatment (GPD) N/A N/A N/A Length of water mains (miles) N/A N/A N/A Length of sewer mains (miles) N/A N/A N/A Has this project been filed with MEPA before? Yes (EEA # ) No Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before? Yes (EEA # ) No - 2 - GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION – all proponents must fill out this section PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Describe the existing conditions and land uses on the project site: This project encompasses the area along the Monatiquot River in Braintree, Massachusetts, from the stone arch Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) railroad bridge at the downstream project limits to the Plain Street bridge at the upstream limits. Several barriers to fish passage exist along the project river reach, and the proposed project will restore fish passage through this reach. There are three specific barriers that will be addressed as part of this restoration project. These are described from downstream to upstream. The natural fish passage barrier known as Rock Falls is located upstream of the MBTA bridge and has a 4-foot grade drop over a relatively short distance. The significant grade change and channel slope are a barrier to fish passage. Upstream of Rock Falls is the Ames Pond dam, which is a non-jurisdictional concrete dam that blocks fish passage. Lastly, the Armstrong dam is located upstream of the Ames Pond dam and impounds an approximately 3.8-acre area known as Hollingsworth Pond. The impoundment stretches from the dam to the Plain Street bridge. The Ames Pond and Armstrong dams are both owned by Hollingsworth Pond LLC. The Ames Pond dam (also known as Factory Pond dam, MA#03101) varies between 2 to 3 feet high and is approximately 50 feet long and is considered a non-jurisdictional dam. Therefore, no hazard rating is attributed to this dam. The dam is partially breached and no longer has a formal impoundment upstream. Even though this dam is partially breached, the velocities flowing over the dam are too high for fish passage. The Armstrong dam (MA#03102) is approximately 12 feet high and 92 feet long and is located beneath a former mill building known as the Armstrong Cork building. The concrete dam is classified by MA ODS as an intermediate-sized, high hazard potential structure that is in “fair” condition. The dam has eight main bays separated by concrete piers (structural supports for the building) on the spillway and one low auxiliary bay, which acts as a low-level outlet, located 5 feet in front of the dam. The dam is a significant barrier to fish passage due to the lack of an existing fish ladder. The dam is operated in a run-of-river mode and does not provide any flood protection; in fact, under flooding conditions, the dam acts to increase the water level and area of inundation upstream of the dam. The Armstrong dam impoundment is referenced as Hollingsworth Pond and has an approximate inundation area of approximately 3.8 acres extending approximately 2,400 linear feet upstream to the Plain Street bridge. Hollingsworth Pond has a water storage capacity of approximately 20 acre-feet. Small pockets of bordering vegetated wetlands are found along the periphery of the impoundment, but most land use surrounding the impoundment is classified as developed. Some of this development includes the Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles (RMV), the Bayshore Athletic Club, an auxiliary parking lot located east of the impoundment, and the MBTA Old Colony Line Middleboro Branch railroad, which parallels the impoundment to the west. The primary goals of the project are to remove two aging and obsolete dams, improve public safety, restore fish passage along this reach of the Monatiquot River, and provide opportunities for diadromous fish to reach Great Pond for spawning and rearing habitats. Figure 1-1 of the Supplemental Information Report and Sheets EX-1, EX-2, and EX-3 of project plans in Appendix D of the same report provide an overview of existing conditions in the vicinity of the project. Please refer to the Supplemental Information Report, Section 2.0, and relevant technical appendices for more detailed discussion of existing conditions. Describe the proposed project and its programmatic and physical elements: - 3 - NOTE: The project description should summarize both the project’s direct and indirect impacts (including construction period impacts) in terms of their magnitude, geographic extent, duration and frequency, and reversibility, as applicable. It should also discuss the infrastructure requirements of the project and the capacity of the municipal and/or regional infrastructure to sustain these requirements into the future. The proposed project involves removal of the Armstrong dam and the Ames Pond dam, reconstruction of the Monatiquot River channel within Hollingsworth Pond, construction of a fish passage structure (natural bypass channel or 30-foot-long steep pass) at Rock Falls, construction of a multiuse trail adjacent to the river, and construction of a vehicular and pedestrian bridge over the river. Completion of this project would restore riverine habitat, provide uninterrupted aquatic fish and wildlife passage from Fore River Bay to Great Pond (a 180-acre high-quality fish spawning/rearing habitat), reduce flood risks, encourage public access to the river, and create a patch of open space in a relatively urbanized section of Braintree. Armstrong Dam and Hollingsworth Impoundment Dewatering of the Hollingsworth Pond impoundment and removal of the Armstrong dam will restore approximately 5,200 linear feet of natural free-flowing habitat on the Monatiquot River and will create over 3 acres of naturalized open space.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations
    Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations Fore River Watershed Mystic River Watershed Neponset River Watershed Weir River Watershed Project Number 2002-02/MWI June 30, 2003 Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations Project Number 2002-01/MWI June 30, 2003 Report Prepared by: Ian Cooke, Neponset River Watershed Association Libby Larson, Mystic River Watershed Association Carl Pawlowski, Fore River Watershed Association Wendy Roemer, Neponset River Watershed Association Samantha Woods, Weir River Watershed Association Report Prepared for: Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Ellen Roy Herzfelder, Secretary Department of Environmental Protection Robert W. Golledge, Jr., Commissioner Bureau of Resource Protection Cynthia Giles, Assistant Commissioner Division of Municipal Services Steven J. McCurdy, Director Division of Watershed Management Glenn Haas, Director Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations Project Number 2002-01/MWI July 2001 through June 2003 Report Prepared by: Ian Cooke, Neponset River Watershed Association Libby Larson, Mystic River Watershed Association Carl Pawlowski, Fore River Watershed Association Wendy Roemer, Neponset River Watershed Association Samantha Woods, Weir River Watershed
    [Show full text]
  • (Osmerus Mordax) Spawning Habitat in the Weymouth- Fore River
    Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-5 Rainbow Smelt (Osmerus mordax) Spawning Habitat in the Weymouth- Fore River Bradford C. Chase and Abigail R. Childs Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Environmental Law Enforcement Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Commonwealth of Massachusetts September 2001 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-5 Rainbow Smelt (Osmerus mordax) Spawning Habitat in the Weymouth-Fore River Bradford C. Chase and Abigail R. Childs Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Annisquam River Marine Fisheries Station 30 Emerson Ave. Gloucester, MA 01930 September 2001 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Paul Diodati, Director Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Environmental Law Enforcement Dave Peters, Commissioner Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Bob Durand, Secretary Commonwealth of Massachusetts Jane Swift, Governor ABSTRACT The spawning habitat of anadromous rainbow smelt in the Weymouth-Fore River, within the cities of Braintree and Weymouth, was monitored during 1988-1990 to document temporal, spatial and biological characteristics of the spawning run. Smelt deposited eggs primarily in the Monatiquot River, upstream of Route 53, over a stretch of river habitat that exceeded 900 m and included over 8,000 m2 of suitable spawning substrate. Minor amounts of egg deposition were found in Smelt Brook, primarily located below the Old Colony railroad embankment where a 6 ft culvert opens to an intertidal channel. The Smelt Brook spawning habitat is degraded by exposure to chronic stormwater inputs, periodic raw sewer discharges and modified stream hydrology. Overall, the entire Weymouth-Fore River system supports one of the larger smelt runs in Massachusetts Bay, with approximately 10,000 m2 of available spawning substrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File, 1.08 MB, for Boston Harbor 1999 Water
    LITERATURE CITED Ackerman, M.T. 1989 April. Compilation of Lakes, Ponds, Reservoirs and Impoundments Relative to the Massachusetts Lake Classification Program. Publication: #15901-171-50-4-89-c.r. Technical Services Branch, Massachusetts Division of Water Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, Westborough, MA. ACOE. 1998. Use Attainability Study of the East Branch Neponset River Canton, Stoughton, and Sharon, Massachusetts. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England District. Waltham, MA. ACOE. 30 April 2001. Update Report for Massachusetts. [Online]. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England District. http://www.nae.usace.army.mil. 4 January 2002. ACOE. 31 October 2001. Update Report for Massachusetts. [Online]. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England District . http://www.nae.usace.army.mil. 4 January 2002. ACOE. 2001. Annual Water Quality Report Fiscal Year 2000. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England District. Waltham, MA. AMRA. 1997. Comprehensive Report of the Lower Mystic Watershed: Shoreline Survey Results and Analysis for Mystic River, Alewife Brook, Malden River. Alewife/Mystic River Advocates. Somerville, MA. Beaulieu, K. 2001. ([email protected]) Fish community and Benthic Invertebrate Protocol and Datasets for Aberjona and Neponset rivers. United States Geologic Survey, New England Coastal Basins National Water Quality Assessment Program, East Hartford, CT. E-mails to Katie O’Brien, MA DEP dated 22 and 26 October 2001. Berasi, B. and L. Harrahy. 2001. Benthic Macroinvertebrate Phase of BUDGETS. Neponset River Watershed Association. Canton, MA. Big Dig. 2000. The Central Artery Tunnel; The Big Dig Worth Its Wait [Online] http://www.bigdig.com/ Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, Boston, MA.
    [Show full text]
  • Armstrong Dam Removal Feasibility Study Final Report
    Armstrong Dam Removal FEASIBILITY STUDY Monatiquot River - Braintree, Massachusetts Prepared for: In partnership with: Prepared by: FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 2016 This page intentionally left blank. Executive Summary Armstrong Dam Removal FEASIBILITY STUDY – DRAFT REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Purpose The purpose of this project is to evaluate the feasibility of restoring access for diadromous1 fish to historically native habitats in the Upper Fore River Basin including its tributaries, the Monatiquot, Farm and Cochato Rivers by removing the Armstrong Dam, also known as Hollingsworth Dam, in Braintree, MA. The ultimate goal is restoring river herring access to the 180-acre Great Pond Reservoir in the Farm River basin headwaters. Great Pond serves as a water supply source for the towns of Braintree, Holbrook and Randolph (Tri-Town Water Board). A recent river herring and spawning nursery habitat assessment (Chase et al. 2015) was conducted that demonstrated Great Pond provides suitable river herring spawning habitat. Imagery Credit: Duane Raver/USFWS Species targeted for restoration include both species of river herring (blueback herring and alewife), American eel, and sea lamprey, all of which are diadromous fish that depend upon passage between marine and freshwater habitats to complete their life cycle. Reasons for pursuing fish passage restoration in the Upper Fore River Basin include the importance and historical presence of the target species, the connectivity of and significant potential habitat within the watershed, and active public input and support. F.X. Messina Enterprises, the Armstrong Dam owner, is interested in removing the dam to The impact of diadromous fish species extends eliminate maintenance costs and liability and far beyond the scope of a single restoration potentially developing the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Hazard Mitigation Plan to Be Presented at January 10 Public Meeting
    DRAFT TOWN OF BRAINTREE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2019 UPDATE [This page intentionally left blank] DRAFT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS & CREDITS This plan was prepared for the Town of Braintree by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) under the direction of the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) and the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR). The plan was funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Grant Program. MAPC Officers President, Keith Bergman, Town of Littleton Vice President, Erin Wortman, Town of Stoneham Secretary, Sandra Hackman, Town of Bedford Treasurer, Taber Keally, Town of Milton Executive Director, Marc Draisen, MAPC Credits Project Manager: Martin Pillsbury Lead Project Planner: Anne Herbst Mapping/GIS Services: Caitlin Spence Andrea Huerfano Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency Director: Kurt Schwartz Department of Conservation and Recreation Commissioner: Leo Roy Braintree Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Kelly Phelan Conservation Planner, Project Manager Amy Carey Health Inspector, LEPC Director Jim Arsenault Director, Public Works Cynthia O’Connell Stormwater Manager Steve Wallace Police Officer Robert Ferrisi Director, Operation Braintree Rehabilitation Hospital Suzanne Coneys Director, Quality and Risk Mgmt. Braintree Rehabilitation Hospital Kevin Nelligan Captain, Fire Department Joe Reynolds Chief of Staff, Mayor’s Office Ken Stone Energy Services and Accounting Mgr. Braintree Electric Light Department Anne Lally Athletic Trainer, Thayer Academy John Morse Assistant Town Engineer Christopher Ayers OSHA Chris DiBona Director of Clinical Performance, Brewster Ambulance Bob James Director, Emergency Management Robert Millette Emergency Management Dennis Girardi Emergency Management Bob Campbell Town Engineer TOWN OF BRAINTREE – HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN – 2019 UPDATE I DRAFT John Mattson Clean Harbors David Medina Clean Harbors Nicole Perry Public Health Nurse Jay St.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic Data of the Neponset and Weymouth River Basins, Massachusetts
    Ui\:ITED STATES DEPARTf\lENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY l\1ASSACHUSETTS HYDROLOGIC- DATA REPORT No. 14 HYDROLOGIC DATA OF THE NEPONSET AND WEYMOUTH RIVER BASINS, MASSACHUSETTS BY R. A . BRACKLEY, WILLIAM B. FLECK AND RICH A RD E. WILLEY "'!00 'J 00 '1' JO /)(,)() ~ NEPONSET AND WEYMOUTH RIVER BASINS I SIJI-.X MAl' 01-' MA S...;A \. Ht '~ l-:-rn-; :.:'IJ l lt 0 21J ¥ J III II• PR F PAR EO I~ COOPERAT IO!'\ WIT H THE CO ~l\10N\VEAL TH OF MASSACHUSETTS \VATER RESOURCES COM f\1ISSION 1973 ill~ITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC DATA OF THE NEPONSET AND WEYMOUTH RIVER BASINS, MASSACHUSETTS By R. A. Brackley, William B. Fleck, and Richard E. Willey Massachusetts Hydrologic-Data Report No. 14 Records of surface-water discharges, selected wells and borings, and chemical analyses of water in the Neponset and Weymouth River basins, Massachusetts Prepared in cooperation with THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION Boston, Massachusetts 1973 OPEN-FILE REPORT CONTENTS Page Introduction-------------------~----------~--------------------- 1 Sources of information-----------------------------------------­ 2 Definition of terms--------------------------------------------­ 2 Selected equivalents-------------------------------------------­ 4 Selected references--------------------------------------------- 5 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate is in pocket Plate 1. Map of the Neponset and Weymouth River basins, showing sites of hydrologic data. Page Figure 1. Monthly mean discharge at stream-gaging stations and monthend water level in selected wells in the Neponset and Weymouth River basins, 1965-68--------- 6 TABLES Page Table 1. Description of selected wells and borings------------- 10 2. Logs of selected wells and borings-------------------- 19 3. Chemical analyses of ground water--------------------- 30 4. Stream sites and discharge measurements--------------- 33 5.
    [Show full text]
  • "Attachment 4 June 2013 Massdot Impaired Waters Program"
    Massachusetts Department of Transportation Semi Annual Submittal under MassDOT’s Impaired Water Program Attachment 4: No Discharges from MassDOT Outfalls Assessments MA35029 Hilchey Pond, TMDL is Phosphorus MA36-40 Abbey Brook including Bemis Pond MA42015 Dutton Pond, TMDL is Phosphorus MA51105 Mill Pond, TMDL is Phosphorus MA71047 Winter Pond MA71-09 Winn Brook MA72-33 Charles River, TMDL is Pathogen MA74-06 Cochato River MA83-08 Shawsheen River MA83009 Hussey Pond MA83015 Rabbit Pond MA83-11 Long Meadow Brook MA83-13 Sandy Brook MA93011 Cape Pond MA95166 White Island Pond, TMDL is Phosphorus MA95173 White Island Pond, TMDL is Phosphorus MA95-35 Mattapoisett Harbor MA95-64 Little Bay 6/08/2013 Impaired Waters Assessment for Hilchey Pond (MA35029) Impaired Water Body Name: Hilchey Pond Location: Gardner, Massachusetts Water Body ID: MA35029 Impairments Hilchey Pond (MA35029) is listed under Category 4a, “TMDL is Completed”, on MassDEP’s final Massachusetts Year 2012 Integrated List of Waters (MassDEP, 2013). Hilchey Pond is impaired due to the following: turbidity According to MassDEP’s Millers River Watershed 2000 Water Quality Assessment Report (MassDEP, 2004), the primary and secondary contact recreational, fish consumption, aquatic life, and aesthetic uses of Hilchey Pond have not been assessed. Hilchey Pond (MA35029) also falls under the jurisdiction of MassDEP’s TMDLs of Phosphorus for Selected Millers Basin Lakes, which addresses the turbidity impairment (MassDEP, 2003). Relevant Water Quality Standards Water Body Classification: Class B Applicable State Regulations: 314 CMR 4.05 (3) (b) 6 Color and Turbidity. These waters shall be free from color and turbidity in concentrations or combinations that are aesthetically objectionable or would impair any use assigned to this Class.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE ...No. 4835
    HOUSE . No. 4835 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts _______________ The committee of conference on the disagreeing votes of the two branches with reference to the Senate amendment (striking out all after the enacting clause and inserting in place thereof the text contained in Senate document numbered 2602) of the House Bill promoting climate change adaptation, environmental and natural resource protection, and investment in recreational assets and opportunity (House, No. 4613), reports recommending passage of the accompanying bill (House, No. 4835) [Bond Issue: $2,402,833,000.00] July 26, 2018. David M. Nangle William N. Brownsberger Smitty Pignatelli Anne M. Gobi Donald R. Berthiaume Donald F. Humason, Jr. 1 of 130 FILED ON: 7/26/2018 HOUSE . No. 4835 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts _______________ In the One Hundred and Ninetieth General Court (2017-2018) _______________ An Act promoting climate change adaptation, environmental and natural resource protection, and investment in recreational assets and opportunity. Whereas, The deferred operation of this act would tend to defeat its purpose, which is to forthwith provide for climate change adaptation and the immediate preservation and improvement of the environmental and energy assets of the commonwealth, therefore it is hereby declared to be an emergency law, necessary for the immediate preservation of the public convenience. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 SECTION 1. To provide for
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019 Colleagues, in Honor of the Division's 10-Year Anniversary, This Issue of Ebb&Flow Brings Attention to Some Of
    Summer 2019 Colleagues, In honor of the Division’s 10-Year Anniversary, this issue of Ebb&Flow brings attention to some of the Division’s urban work, which is carried out in partnership with community organizations around the state. Working in an urban environment brings unique technical, logistical, and cost challenges. Yet, as the climate continues to change, the importance of and interest in urban river and wetland restoration projects will continue to grow. First, we present a retrospective of the Division’s urban river restoration and revitalization work. Urban river restoration improves access to and recreation along waterways in densely developed areas. Projects improve water quality and reintroduce overlooked natural resources amenities in environmental justice communities. Read more about this work. Second, after more than 10 years of planning, the Tel-Electric Dam Removal in Pittsfield begins construction, and you can read about it. Located on the West Branch of the Housatonic River, the dam is surrounded by former mill buildings, railroad bridges, walls, and utility lines. Removing the dam will reduce upstream flood levels, restore floodplain storage and functions, improve water quality, and provide public access via a new Greenway. Please also check out our recently-released video about the project, filmed through a partnership with University of Massachusetts Amherst’s Science Media Collaborative. Enjoy the last weeks of summer. I’ll see you on the river! Beth Lambert, Director In this issue: − DER’s New Engineering Group
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information, write to: U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Division 10 Bearfoot Road Northborough, MA 01532 2000 PREFACE This volume of the annual hydrologic data report of Massachusetts and Rhode Island is one of a series of annual reports that document hydrologic data gathered from the U.S Geological Survey’s surface- and ground-water data-collection networks in each State, Puerto Rico, and the Trust Territories. These records of streamflow, ground-water levels, and quality of water provide the hydrologic information needed by State, local, and Federal agencies, and the private sector for developing and managing our Nation’s land and water resources. Hydrologic data for Massachusetts and Rhode Island are contained in one volume. This report is the culmination of a concerted effort by dedicated personnel of the U.S. Geological Survey who collected, compiled, analyzed, verified, and organized the data, and who typed, edited, and assembled the report. In addition to the authors, who had primary responsibility for assuring that the information contained herein is accurate, complete, and adheres to Geological Survey policy and established guidelines, the following individuals contributed significantly to the collection, processing, and tabulation of the data: Kimberly W. Campo Britt O. Stock Linda Y. Comeau Joan S. Whitley Charles R. Leighton Joseph F. Whitley Domenic Murino, Jr. Joseph L. Zanca Anne M. Weaver was responsible for the word processing and publishing phases of the report and Mark V. Bonito prepared the illustrations. Jason R.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices 1 - 5
    2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Appendices 1 - 5 Massachusetts Integrated List of Waters for the Clean Water Act 2018/20 Reporting Cycle Draft for Public Comment Prepared by: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management Watershed Planning Program 2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Table of Contents Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters................................................................................................................................... 3 Appendix 2. Assessment units and integrated list categories presented alphabetically by major watershed ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Appendix 3. Impairments added to the 2018/2020 integrated list .......................................................... 113 Appendix 4. Impairments removed from the 2018/2020 integrated list ................................................. 139 Appendix 5. Impairments changed from the prior reporting cycle .......................................................... 152 2 2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters Approval/Completion ATTAINS Action ID Report Title Date 5, 6 Total Maximum
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study to Restore River Herring Fore River Watershed I
    Feasibility Study to Restore River i Herring Fore River Watershed Executive Summary Background The Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF) is evaluating the feasibility of restoring populations of river herring to the Fore River system. The Fore River Basin is located south of Boston and primarily includes the towns of Braintree, Randolph, Holbrook, Quincy, and Weymouth. The main river draining into the Fore River Bay is the Monatiquot River. The Monatiquot River is formed by two primary tributaries, the Farm and Cochato Rivers. Shown in Figure E-1 is a layout of the watershed and the proposed migration route for river herring. Shown in Figure E-2 are the Farm River, Cochato River and Monatiquot River drainage areas. DMF is evaluating the feasibility of restoring river herring to Great Pond and Sunset Lake in Braintree. The Monatiquot River historically contained a large run of alewife that spawned in Great Pond; however successful spawning runs ceased after the construction of dams during the industrial revolution. Although river herring were believed to be Rock Falls absent from the river system, the DMF and the Fore River Watershed Association (FRWA) observed river herring at the natural falls1 below Hollingsworth Dam in the 1990s (see Figure E-1 for location). The DMF believes that river herring are spawning in marginal habitat in the main stem Monatiquot River near Route 93. Given these observations and the amount of potential spawning habitat further upstream of Rock Falls in Great Pond and Sunset Lake, the Project Partners2 evaluated the feasibility of restoring river herring to the upper watershed.
    [Show full text]