DOCSLIB.ORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT of MINNESOTA in RE: Supervalu, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation MEMO

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT of MINNESOTA in RE: Supervalu, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation MEMO ECUG!1<25.ex.15771.CFO.VPN!!!Fqewogpv!46!!!Hkngf!12018027!!!Rcig!2!qh!28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA IN RE: SuperValu, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Court File No. 14-MD-2586 ADM/TNL This Document Relates to: All Actions _____________________________________________________________________________ Ben Barnow, Esq., Barnow and Associates, P.C., Chicago, IL; Edwin J. Kilpela, Jr., Esq., Carlson Lynch Sweet & Kilpela, LLP, Pittsburgh, PA; Rhett A. McSweeney, Esq., McSweeney/Langevin, LLC, Minneapolis, MN; Karen Hanson Riebel, Esq., and Richard A. Lockridge, Esq., Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, on behalf of Plaintiffs. Harvey J. Wolkoff, Esq., and Kathryn E. Wilhelm, Esq., Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, MA; Katherine S. Barrett Wiik, Esq., and Stephen P. Safranski, Esq., Robins Kaplan LLP, Minneapolis, MN, on behalf of Defendant SuperValu, Inc. John L. Landolfi, Esq., Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP, Columbus, OH; and Marc A. Al, Esq., Stoel Rives LLP, Minneapolis, MN, on behalf of Defendants AB Acquisition, LLC and New Albertson’s Inc. ____________________________________________________________________________ I. INTRODUCTION On November 3, 2015, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on Defendants SuperValu, Inc. (“SuperValu”), AB Acquisition, LLC (“AB Acquisition”), and New Albertson’s Inc.’s (“Albertson’s”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint [Docket No. 33]. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is granted. II. BACKGROUND In this multidistrict litigation case, sixteen named plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) allege they were harmed by hackers gaining access to and installing malicious software on the payment- processing network for payment card transactions at Defendants’ retail grocery stores. ECUG!1<25.ex.15771.CFO.VPN!!!Fqewogpv!46!!!Hkngf!12018027!!!Rcig!3!qh!28 Consolidated Am. Class Action Compl. (“Amended Complaint”) [Docket No. 28] ¶¶ 16–45. Plaintiffs allege the malicious software released and disclosed the Personal Identifying Information (“PII”) of Plaintiffs and Class Members who used their payment cards for purchases at the affected stores. Id. ¶ 36. The Amended Complaint states claims for negligence, negligence per se, breach of implied contract, unjust enrichment, and violations of various state consumer protection and data breach notification laws. Id. ¶¶ 13, 96–159. Plaintiffs assert their claims as class actions. Id. ¶¶ 83–95. A. Defendants Defendants own and operate retail grocery stores in the United States. Id. ¶¶ 2-3, 33-35. SuperValu controls the payment processing at its stores and also provides payment processing services for AB Acquisition and Albertson’s stores. Id. ¶ 3. B. Data Breach On August 14, 2014, Defendants announced in press releases that from June 22, 2014 to July 17, 2014, hackers had gained unauthorized access to and installed malicious software on the portion of SuperValu’s computer network that processes payment card transactions for Defendants’ retail stores. Id. ¶¶ 4–5, 36. The intrusion resulted in potential theft of information embedded in the magnetic strip of payment cards for sales transacted at 209 SuperValu stores and 836 AB Acquisition stores. Id. ¶ 36. The PII embedded in the magnetic strip included cardholder names, account numbers, expiration dates, and PINS. Id. ¶¶ 1, 42. The press releases stated Defendants’ offer of 12 months of complimentary consumer identity protection services to customers whose cards may have been affected by the data breach. Id. ¶ 45. On September 29, 2014, Defendants announced in press releases that a second data 2 ECUG!1<25.ex.15771.CFO.VPN!!!Fqewogpv!46!!!Hkngf!12018027!!!Rcig!4!qh!28 breach occurred in late August or early September 2014. Id. ¶ 6. In this second instance, hackers installed different malware onto the portion of SuperValu’s computer network that processes payment card transactions for some retail stores owned or operated by AB Acquisition and Albertson’s (collectively referred to with the stores affected in the first breach as the “Affected Stores”). Id. ¶¶ 6, 44. Plaintiffs allege the two incidents (collectively referred to as the “Data Breach”) are related and stem from Defendants’ same fundamental security failures. Id. ¶ 7. C. Named Plaintiffs Plaintiffs are consumers who shopped at Defendants’ stores that were affected by the Data Breach. Id. ¶¶ 16–31. Plaintiffs provided their PII to Defendants when they used their payment cards at Defendants’ Affected Stores. Id. ¶¶ 1, 16–31. D. Alleged Harm Although customer data at over 1,000 of Defendants’ stores was accessed, the only alleged misuse of any Plaintiff’s PII following the Data Breach is a single unauthorized charge on one Plaintiff’s credit card. Plaintiff David Holmes alleges he experienced a fraudulent charge on his payment card after shopping at one of Defendants’ Affected Stores and, upon noticing the fraudulent charge on his credit card statement, he immediately cancelled his credit card.1 Id. ¶ 31. Holmes does not specify the amount or date of the fraudulent charge, nor does he allege the charge was unreimbursed or that he incurred bank fees or other monetary losses related to the charge. See id. No other Plaintiff alleges any unauthorized charges on their account, and no 1 Holmes does not specify whether he shopped at an Affected Store during the time periods associated with the Data Breach. See id. ¶ 31. For the purposes of this Motion, the Court assumes he did. 3 ECUG!1<25.ex.15771.CFO.VPN!!!Fqewogpv!46!!!Hkngf!12018027!!!Rcig!5!qh!28 Plaintiff, including Holmes, has alleged experiencing identity theft or attempted identity theft after the Data Breach. See generally Am. Compl. All sixteen of the named Plaintiffs allege that after Defendants announced the Data Breach, Plaintiffs spent time determining whether their cards were compromised and monitoring their account information to guard against potential fraud. Id. ¶¶ 16–31. One Plaintiff, Kenneth Hanff, further alleges he closed his checking account and opened a new one to prevent fraudulent purchases. Id. ¶ 18. Based on these factual allegations, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants’ wrongful conduct, the resulting Data Breach, and the potential disclosure of Plaintiffs’ and other Class Members’ PII have caused them to suffer harm including: (i) diminished value of their PII; (ii) untimely and inadequate notification of the Data Breach; (iii) increased risk of future losses, economic damages, and other harm; (iv) opportunity cost and value of lost time spent monitoring financial accounts and payment card accounts; (v) invasion of privacy and breach of the confidentiality of their PII by Defendants’ unauthorized release and disclosure; and (vi) lost benefit of the bargain. Id. ¶¶ 32, 82. E. Procedural History A total of four putative class actions brought by a total of twelve Plaintiffs were filed against Defendants in federal courts in Illinois, Minnesota, and Idaho. See, McPeak v. SuperValu, Inc., 3:14-cv-00899 (S.D. Ill., filed Aug. 18, 2014); Hanff v. SuperValu Inc., 14-cv- 3252 (D. Minn., filed Aug. 25, 2014); Mertz v. SuperValu, Inc., 14-cv-04660 (D. Minn., filed Nov. 4, 2014); and Rocke v. SuperValu, Inc., 1:14-cv-00511 (D. Idaho, filed Nov. 26, 2014). In December 2014, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation centralized the four complaints to 4 ECUG!1<25.ex.15771.CFO.VPN!!!Fqewogpv!46!!!Hkngf!12018027!!!Rcig!6!qh!28 this Court for coordinated pre-trial proceedings. See Transfer Order [Docket No. 1]. On June 26, 2015, Plaintiffs filed the Amended Complaint alleging six causes of action on behalf of sixteen named Plaintiffs. See generally Am. Compl. The sixteen named Plaintiffs consist of the twelve original Plaintiffs plus four new Plaintiffs. See id. ¶¶ 27–30. Defendants now move to dismiss the Amended Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). III. DISCUSSION A. Rule 12(b)(1): Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Defendants argue the Amended Complaint must be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(1) for Plaintiffs’ failure to allege facts establishing Article III standing, which is a prerequisite to subject matter jurisdiction. See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 559–60 (1992). 1. Standard of Review Defendants’ Motion attacks the sufficiency of the pleadings and thus raises a facial, rather than factual, challenge to the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction. See Stalley v. Catholic Health Initiatives, 509 F.3d 517, 521 (8th Cir. 2007). In analyzing a facial challenge to jurisdiction, the Court applies the same standard of review as that in Rule 12 (b)(6) cases. Id. The Court “accepts as true all factual allegations in the complaint, giving no effect to conclusory allegations of law.” Id. Plaintiffs must affirmatively and plausibly assert facts that suggest they have the right to jurisdiction, rather than facts that are merely consistent with that right. See id. (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007)). “Determining whether a claim is plausible is a ‘context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense.’” Hamilton v. Palm, 621 F.3d 816, 818 (8th Cir. 2010) (quoting 5 ECUG!1<25.ex.15771.CFO.VPN!!!Fqewogpv!46!!!Hkngf!12018027!!!Rcig!7!qh!28 Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). 2. Article III Standing “Article III standing is a threshold question in every federal court case.” United States v. One Lincoln Navigator 1998, 328 F.3d 1011, 1013 (8th Cir. 2003). The party invoking federal jurisdiction has the burden of establishing standing. Lujan, 504 U.S. at 560. To meet this burden, a plaintiff must show: (1) an injury in fact; (2) a causal connection between the injury and the challenged conduct of the defendant; and (3) a likelihood that a favorable ruling will redress the alleged injury. Young Am. Corp. v. Affiliated Computer Servs. (ACS), Inc., 424 F.3d 840, 843 (8th Cir.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Ceridian Form 10
    STUVWXYZR March 2, 2001 Dear Stockholder: As we first announced in July 2000, Ceridian will split into two independent, publicly-traded companies, Ceridian and Arbitron, through a tax-free spin transaction. We believe the separation of Arbitron and Ceridian will create two sharply focused companies well-positioned to pursue and realize their potential as independent companies in the distinctly different markets they serve. Both businesses have strong competitive positions within their respective markets, solid existing businesses and attractive future prospects. As separate companies, we believe they will be in a better position to pursue attractive growth opportunities for the benefit of the employees and customers of their businesses while optimizing the value of each individual company. After the transaction, Ceridian will be comprised of its human resource services division and subsidiaries and Comdata subsidiaries. These businesses have similar operational profiles in that both provide outsourcing services to customers of all sizes and both have large-scale transaction processing, money movement and regulatory compliance services as their core businesses. Both businesses have significant growth opportunities in their respective markets. We plan to maximize the synergies and the opportunities for cross-selling that exist among and between Comdata and our human resource services business to take better advantage of the potential in these markets. As an independent company, Arbitron will be in a better position to take advantage of the opportunities presented by its two promising new technologies, the Portable People Meter and Arbitron Webcast Ratings. Arbitron plans to pursue co-product development, co-marketing and other relationships with third parties to help accelerate the full commercialization of these two new services which Arbitron believes will significantly improve the way radio, television, cable and Internet streaming media audiences are measured.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceridian HCM Holding Annual Report 2020
    Ceridian HCM Holding Annual Report 2020 Form 10-K (NYSE:CDAY) Published: February 28th, 2020 PDF generated by stocklight.com UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO Commission File Number 001-38467 Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter) Delaware 46-3231686 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 3311 East Old Shakopee Road Minneapolis, Minnesota 55425 (952) 853-8100 (Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $.01 par value CDAY New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES☒ NO ☐ Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. YES☐ NO ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Valspar Corp
    VALSPAR CORP FORM DEF 14A (Proxy Statement (definitive)) Filed 01/21/94 for the Period Ending 02/23/94 Address 901 3RD AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 Telephone 612-851-7000 CIK 0000102741 Symbol VAL SIC Code 2851 - Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels, and Allied Products Industry Chemical Manufacturing Sector Basic Materials Fiscal Year 10/27 http://www.edgar-online.com © Copyright 2014, EDGAR Online, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Distribution and use of this document restricted under EDGAR Online, Inc. Terms of Use. VALSPAR CORP FORM DEF 14A (Proxy Statement (definitive)) Filed 1/21/1994 For Period Ending 2/23/1994 Address 1101 THIRD ST SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota 55415 Telephone 612-332-7371 CIK 0000102741 Industry Chemical Manufacturing Sector Basic Materials Fiscal Year 10/31 SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Filed by the registrant /_X_/ Filed by a party other than the registrant /___/ Check the appropriate box: /___/ Preliminary proxy statement /_X_/ Definitive proxy statement /___/ Definitive additional materials /___/ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12 VALSPAR CORPORATION (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) VALSPAR CORPORATION (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement) Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box): /_X_/ $125 per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), or 14a-6(i)(2). /___/ $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-56(i)(3). /___/ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
    [Show full text]
  • Businesses That Match Employee Donations
    Minnesota Businesses that Match Employee Donations CORPORATION NAME CITY OF HEADQUARTERS 3M Company St. Paul Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America Minneapolis Ameriprise Financial Minneapolis Andersen Corporation Bayport Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Minneapolis Best Buy Co., Inc. Richfield Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota Eagan Buffalo Wild Wings Inc. Minneapolis Cargill, Incorporated Wayzata Carlson Holdings, Inc. Minnetonka Ceridian Corporation Minneapolis CHS Inc. Inver Grove Heights Compeer Financial Mankato Deluxe Corporation Shoreview Donaldson Company, Inc. Minneapolis Dorsey and Whitney LLP Minneapolis Ecolab Inc. St. Paul Edina Realty, Inc. Brainerd Federated Mutual Insurance Company Owatonna First National Bank Bemidji Bemidji General Mills, Inc. Minneapolis Graco Inc. Minneapolis H.B. Fuller Company St. Paul Homecrest Industries, Inc. Wadena Hormel Foods Corporation Austin Hutchinson Technology Incorporated Hutchinson International Dairy Queen, Inc. Minneapolis Jostens, Inc. Minneapolis Land O'Lakes, Inc. Arden Hills Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. Minneapolis M. A. Mortenson Company Minneapolis Medtronic, Inc. Minneapolis Minnesota Power, Inc. Duluth Minnesota Timberwolves Basketball Limited Partnership Minneapolis Minnesota Twins Baseball Club Minneapolis Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC Eagan Minnesota Wild Hockey Club, LP St. Paul Opus Corporation Minnetonka Pentair, Inc. Minneapolis Polaris Industries, Inc. Medina Post Consumer Brands LLC Lakeville Rahr Malting Co. Shakopee Denotes this company also donates for employee volunteer hours 9/13/18 Minnesota Businesses that Match Employee Donations RBC Wealth Management Minneapolis Red Wing Shoe Company, Inc. Red Wing Reell Precision Manufacturing Corporation St. Paul Regis Corporation Minneapolis Riverway Co. Bloomington Robins Kaplan L.L.P. Minneapolis Schoeneckers, Inc Edina Schwan's Company Marshall Securian Financial Group, Inc. St. Paul Security State Bank Hibbing Sit Investment Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 75 Public Companies Minnesota-Based Public Companies Ranked by Revenue
    MINNEAPOLIS ST. PAUL BUSINESS JOURNAL APRIL 5, 2019 TOP 75 PUBLIC COMPANIES MINNESOTA-BASED PUBLIC COMPANIES RANKED BY REVENUE Name / Rank in 2018 (* not ranked) Address Revenue Net Stock symbol: Top local Website Phone Revenue1 change2 income3 Business description change4 executive 9900 Bren Rd. E $229.48 $11.99 Diversified businesses that provide health care benefits Dave UnitedHealth Group Inc. 1 Minnetonka, MN 55343 10.5% UNH: 12.6% 1 billion billion and target health-system performance Wichmann unitedhealthgroup.com 952-936-1300 1000 Nicollet Mall Upscale discount retailer of clothing, home furnishings, $75.35 $2.94 Brian Target Corp. 2 Minneapolis, MN 55403 3.9% beauty products, groceries and other goods in stores and TGT: -2.3% 2 billion billion Cornell target.com 612-304-6073 online 7601 Penn Ave. S $42.88 $1.46 Retailer of consumer electronics, computer and mobile Best Buy Co. Inc. 3 Richfield, MN 55423 1.7% BBY: -23.4% Hubert Joly 3 billion billion phone products, entertainment software, appliances bestbuy.com 612-291-1000 3M Center $32.77 $5.35 A science-based company that provides products and Michael 3M Co. 4 Maplewood, MN 55144 3.5% MMM: -19.1% 4 billion billion solutions to customers in numerous industries Roman 3m.com 651-733-1110 710 Medtronic Pkwy. Products for cardiac and vascular diseases, surgical 5 $30.56 $4.92 Medtronic 5 Fridley, MN 55432 2.8% solutions, diabetes, neurological conditions and spinal MDT: 13.1% Omar Ishrak 5 billion billion medtronic.com 763-514-4000 procedures 800 Nicollet Mall $25.78 $7.1 Multistate bank holding company, diversified financial Andrew U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • JA Report 2012.WEB.Indd
    Financial Literacy | College and Career Readiness | Entrepreneurship Annual Report 2011-2012 Read Max Goldman’s inspiring JA story inside. Inspiring and preparing young people to succeed in a global economy. jaum.org Junior Achievement of the Upper Midwest 1800 White Bear Avenue North, Maplewood, MN 55109 tel: 651.255.0055 | fax: 651.255.0460 | www.jaum.org Design: Richard Hart Design | Printing: AFPI www.jaum.org Dear Partner: This past school year, thousands of community volunteers donated their time and expertise in the classroom, working with teachers and students to teach personal finance, college and career readiness and entrepreneurship. As a result, students in grades K-12 learned real-world skills that will help them succeed in school and beyond. Thank you! In light of the painful economic lessons recently learned by governments, families and businesses, there is an even greater need to educate our youth about how to effectively manage money and prepare for their future. JA programs teach 21st century skills and offer real-world experiences. In the coming year, JAUM is focusing on the following strategies to keep our organization relevant: • Integrate STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Math) careers at JA BizTown and introduce STEM into our K-12 curriculum • Educate students of different backgrounds and ethnicities about financial literacy, college and career readiness and entrepreneurship • Incorporate innovative teaching methods into our learning facility and into our curriculum such as smart board technology, video lessons and personal devices • Offer real-life experiences (job shadows, competitions, capstone projects) to expose students to opportunities beyond their classroom • Conduct local evaluations to validate learning and JAUM’s impact on student motivation As we embark on another exciting year, we look to you for continued support to help connect students with educators and business people to build a more fiscally savvy community.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2006 Salvation Army 1821 University Avenue West, Suite S256 L St
    CORPORATE MEMBERS 2006 FINANCIAL SUMMARY 3M ADC Foundation Allianz Life Insurance Company Memberships 39% of North America Ameriprise Financial In-Kind 33% Assurant Best Buy Co., Inc. Annual Meeting 24% Blue Cross & Blue Shield INCOME Contributions 4% of Minnesota Bremer Bank C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. Cargill Program Services 82% Carlson Ceridian Corporation Management & General 15% CHS Comcast Fundraising 3% Cummins, Inc Delta Dental of MN EXPENSES Dorsey & Whitney LLP Ecolab Faegre & Benson LLP G&K Services DONORS – IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS General Mills GMAC-RFC Carlson Target Graco, Inc. Children’s Home Society Thomson West Guidant Corporation HealthPartners & Family Services Thrivent Financial for Lutherans Land O'Lakes, Inc Comcast The Toro Company Marquette Financial Companies Star Tribune Medica Medtronic, Inc. New York Life Insurance Company North Memorial Health Care Opus Philanthropic Group Park Nicollet Health Services Piper Jaffray Prudential Financial RBC Dain Rauscher Star Tribune Target Corporation TCF National Bank The Toro Company Thomson West Thrivent Financial for Lutherans U.S. Bancorp Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota Xcel Energy ASSOCIATE MEMBERS American Red Cross of the Twin Cities Area Big Brothers Big Sisters THETHE ROROADAD of the Greater Twin Cities Cheerful Givers Children’s Home Society & Family Services Goodwill EasterSeals Greater Twin Cities United Way AHEADAHEAD Hands On Twin Cities Management Assistance Program CORPORATE VOLUNTEERISM COUNCIL–TWIN CITIES (MAP) Memorial Blood Centers ANNUAL REPORT 2006 Salvation Army 1821 University Avenue West, Suite S256 l St. Paul, MN 55104 651.999.5341 l 651.917.1835 fax l [email protected] l www.cvctc.org CVC BOARD LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT LEADERSHIP AWARD President: David Jones, The mission at General Mills is to nourish lives in their communities by addressing societal needs Dear CVC-TC Colleagues: Thrivent Financial for Lutherans GENERAL MILLS with breakthrough ideas, championship people and financial resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q ☒ Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarterly reporting period ended June 30, 2019 ☐ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 001-38467 Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 46-3231686 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification Number) 3311 East Old Shakopee Road Minneapolis, Minnesota 55425 (952) 853-8100 (Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Trading Title of each class Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common stock, $0.01 par value CDAY New York Stock Exchange Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Pay for Performance: a Case Study in Market Alignment of Various Stakeholders
    Minnesota Pay for Performance: A Case Study in Market Alignment of Various Stakeholders Second National Pay for Performance Summit February 14, 2007 Who is the Buyers Health Care Action Group? The Buyers Health Care Action Group is a coalition of public and private employers working to recreate the health care system so consumers will get the care they need in the right place, at the right time and at the right price. We develop purchaser strategies and seek out consumer information tools that promote a safe, timely, efficient, effective, equitable and patient- centered health care system. BHCAG Members z Allina Hospitals z Target Corporation z Alliant Techsystems z St. Jude z AMS z Tennant z Barry Wehmiller z TCF Financial z Berlex Labs z University of Minnesota z Cargill z US Bank z Carlson Companies z Ceridian z Johnson & Johnson z ELCA z Medtronic z General Mills z Minnesota Life z GSK z MN DOER z Honeywell z Olmsted County z Jostens z Park Nicollet z 3M z Resource Training and Solutions z Land O’ Lakes z Rosemount z Merck & Co. z SUPERVALU z Wells Fargo z Sanofi-Aventis Fifteen years of market driven reform z First RFP established long term relationship with Health Partners - “Choice Plus” benefit program is created z The Institute for Clinical Standards Integration is formed in response to the request for treatment guidelines and clinical quality improvement z The Minnesota Health Data Institute is created to gather and publish health care information for consumers z The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation provides five year funding for
    [Show full text]
  • Business/Communication Job Fair Industry Handouts
    Business/Communication Job Fair Industry Handouts This document lists employers who registered for the Fair by the early bird deadline. Check jobfair.umn.edu or the Guidebook app for a complete, up-to-date list of attending employers and job and internship opportunities. Advertising / PR Job Internship MinnesotaJobs.com √ AroundCampus Group √ Murphy Research √ Wilderness Inquiry √ Bellacor.com, Inc. √ Trystar, Inc. Insight Global √ Accounting Job Internship National Marrow Donor Program √ √ National Marrow Donor Program √ √ Northwestern Mutual - Minnesota Department of Revenue √ √ √ The Bohannon Group Solutran √ Medica Health Plans √ Medica Health Plans √ Enterprise Rent-A-Car √ APi National Service Group √ SAGE Electrochromics √ √ Hennepin County, MN √ √ Ameriprise Financial, Inc. √ √ Robert Half International √ Canterbury Park √ √ U.S. Bank √ Robert Half International √ Dakota County, MN √ √ CDW √ Benchmark Electronics, Inc √ √ Twin Cities Orthopedics √ Boys & Girls Clubs of the Twin Cities √ √ MassMutual Central U.S. √ Doherty Top Talent √ √ Boys & Girls Clubs of the Twin √ √ OtterBase - Minneapolis √ Cities The Buckle, Inc. √ √ Banner Engineering √ √ Brady Corporation √ √ Allianz Life √ √ Virtual Radiologic √ √ Brooksource - An Eight Eleven √ The Kenrich Group √ Group Company Plus Relocation √ √ Lurie, LLP √ √ Wolters Kluwer Financial Services √ Greater Des Moines Partnership √ √ Diversant, LLC √ CliftonLarsonAllen, LLP √ √ Ovative/group √ √ Star Tribune Media Company, √ √ LLC Greater Des Moines Partnership √ √ 2nd Shade Patio Furniture
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of Competition
    Bureau of Competition American Bar Assoeiatioa Aatitrust Section Spring MeeBiag 2804 Molly S. Boast Robert Pitofsky Acting Director Chainnan Bureau of Competition Federal Trade Coininission ABA ANTITRUST SECTION SPRING MEETING Summary of Bureau of Competition Activity Fiscal Year 1997 Through March 15,2001' I. Mergers A. Consent Orders 1. * ABB (Final Order April 14, 1999): ABB divested the Analytical Division of Elsag Bailey Process Automation N V. to Siemens Corporation settling antitrust concerns that the acquisition of Elsag would substantially reduce competition in the market for process gas chromatographs and process mass spectrometers, analytical instruments used to measure the chemical composition of a gas or liquid used in petrochemical refiniog, pharmaceutical and chemical manufacturing, and pulp and paper processing. 2. * Agrium, Znc. (Final Order November 13,2000): A consent order requires Agrium to divest a deepwater terminal near Portland, Oregon, an up water terminal in central Washington and other assets settling charges concerning its proposed acquisition of the nitrogen fertilizer business of Union Oil Company ojCalifonia. Agrium and Unocal are the leading producers in the Northwest of nitrogen fertilizer - anhydrous ammonia, urea and UAN 32% solution - ingredients used for plant growth. 3. * Albertson 's, Znc. (Final Order December 8, 1998): A consent order requires Albertson's to divest eight supermarkets in Montana and seven in Wyoming to Supexvalu Holdings, Inc. in an effort to maintain competitive pricing in the areas. According to the complaint, Albertson's acquisition of Buftrey Food and Drug Store Company would result in higher prices and reduced quality in 11 * Denotes new cases during this period -- the fust public notice of an enforcement action by the Commission 1 communities 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report
    $QQXDO5HSRUW Dear Fellow Ceridian Stockholders, We hope this finds you safe and well. It was another very strong year for Ceridian, and we are exceptionally proud of how our entire Ceridian team has responded to the dramatic change in the business realities faced by all. We continued to deliver against our five strategic growth levers: growing in our existing markets; expanding within the Enterprise segment; accelerating our global expansion; extending the Dayforce platform; and innovating in adjacent markets, such as Dayforce Wallet. Our growth agenda is about delivering quantifiable value to our customers and creating customers for life. In 2020, we received tremendous validation of our leadership in the global HCM market. Ceridian was named a Leader in the Gartner 2020 Magic Quadrant for Cloud HCM Suites for 1,000+ Employee Enterprises. Further, Ceridian received the highest scores for the North American compliance suites, payroll admin, and the workforce management use cases in the Gartner Critical Capabilities for Cloud HCM Suites for 1,000+ Employee Enterprises. For years, organizations have been thinking and talking about digitization. COVID-19 has made this an imperative overnight. Organizations, globally, are looking for a deeper level of innovation and value from an HCM system as they turn their focus to accelerating their digital transformation initiatives. We are uniquely positioned to help customers navigate this new borderless, more fluid world of work, and that is driving increased demand for Dayforce. We ended 2020 with 4,906 customers live on the Dayforce platform, a net increase of 543 year-over-year. That strong demand for Dayforce helped us exceed our financial and operational targets, while we continue to invest strategically for future growth.
    [Show full text]