Corporate Actions Processing Ten Common Pain Points and How to Resolve Them 2 | Corporate Actions Processing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Corporate Actions Processing Ten Common Pain Points and How to Resolve Them 2 | Corporate Actions Processing Corporate actions processing Ten common pain points and how to resolve them 2 | Corporate Actions Processing This white paper will untangle some of the complexity that exists in the corporate actions arena. It examines ten common pain points and provides guidance on how to tackle them . This communication is provided by Advent Software, Inc. (“Advent”) for informational purposes only and should not be construed as or relied on in lieu of, and does not constitute, legal advice on any matter whatsoever discussed herein. Advent shall have no liability in connection with this communication or any reliance thereon. | 3 Keeping Pace Improving the efficiency of The Shifting Corporate the introduction of new and evolving investment vehicles and tax law, means corporate actions handling can Actions Landscape help cut costs, provide competitive there is exponentially more processing work involved. advantage through better client Corporate actions processing has long service, maintain regulatory been a byword for inefficiency and risk in Improving the efficiency of corporate compliance, and reduce operational the securities industry. While great strides actions handling can help cut costs, and reputational risks. were being made toward the nirvana provide competitive advantage through of straight through processing (STP) better client service, maintain regulatory in many other areas of the investment compliance, and reduce operational and realm, corporate actions were written reputational risks. By the same token, off as complex processes that were corporate action errors—a mislaid unsystematic, esoteric and hard to notification, a mistyped data input, a automate, and where IT spending offered misapplied event—can result in painful little tangible return on investment. financial losses. While precise figures are hard to come by, industry observers Today, however, that is changing—at estimate that 10 percent of annual least to some extent. Industry initiatives corporate actions processing costs are to create more standardized corporate attributable to “write-off” funds reserved action messages, enactment of cost for losses, which translates into tens of basis reporting legislation, and the arrival millions of dollars. of better vendor software systems are helping to drive up automation rates. This white paper will untangle some of the complexity that exists in the corporate And there is good reason for this actions arena. It will explain how corporate heightened emphasis if investment actions are typically handled today and managers—and the securities industry the challenges investment managers face as a whole—are to keep pace with the in processing them. It will then examine shifting landscape. The accelerating ten common pain points and provide rate of company mergers, acquisitions, guidance on how to tackle them. Finally, divestitures, and entity changes, and it will highlight the role technology can 4 | Corporate Actions Processing Corporate actions processing has long been a byword for inefficiency and risk in the securities industry. | 5 Accurate actions processing is critical to the firm’s reputation for client service, as well as to its bottom line. play in improving efficiency and accuracy, complex. The first is that they usually The subsequent outcome of the corporate and outline a series of best practices for involve “obtaining and verifying several action—for example, payment of cash and corporate actions processing. pieces of time-critical information.” shares following a merger—must then be correctly applied to the investment Secondly, the report continues, corporate manager’s portfolios. Mishandling this What Are Corporate Actions? actions are not one-time events, requiring process could mean anything from the a certain action on a specific date. Rather, manager trading shares it does not own to At this point it will be helpful to define they involve a series of actions spread having inaccurate valuations and accounts what we mean by a corporate action. In over a period of time: “a date upon which and misreporting clients’ tax positions. essence, a corporate action is any event information is officially released, a date Accurate processing therefore is critical to initiated by a company that changes its that shareholders can begin to take action, the firm’s reputation for client service, as capital structure or financial condition, a date by which they must submit their well as to its bottom line. and thus impacts its shareholders. Some responses (instructions regarding what examples include dividend payments, they would like to do in regard to the Ma Bell and Her Babies stock splits, stock buybacks, mergers, options made available to them), a date The history of AT&T, perhaps more than tender offers, spin-offs, name changes, and on which the payment or disbursement of any other company, illustrates the complex delistings. funds occurs, a date on which the return or and far-reaching impact of corporate distribution of shares occurs, and a date actions. American Telephone & Telegraph For investment managers, such corporate upon which all the aforementioned changes Company grew out of the Bell Telephone events have great significance, since to the security ‘settle.’” Company, founded in 1885 by Alexander they materially affect the value of their Graham Bell, and over the ensuing century portfolios. Yet keeping track of the For investment managers, this means it grew through countless acquisitions panoply of events and processing them ensuring they receive accurate notification to become the world’s largest telephone correctly—especially considering the of the impending corporate action, company. universe of securities portfolio managers research and assess what action (if any) oversee—is a monumental task. they need to take in light of it, and then As a result of a Justice Department respond with their instructions in the antitrust action, AT&T was forced to As Aite Group notes in its report, Corporate appropriate manner, often with requisite divest its seven regional Bell Operating Actions Systems Vendor Comparison: documentation, in time to meet the issuer’s Companies, known as the “Baby Bells,” One Step Closer to STP, two factors make response deadline. as independent companies in 1983, corporate actions processing particularly although it continued to offer long distance 6 | Corporate Actions Processing Investment managers commonly obtain their event notifications from multiple sources—their custodians, the exchanges, and data vendors. service. In 1991, AT&T acquired NCR factor in the accelerating pace of mergers A further complication is that investment Corporation to get into the computer and acquisitions in today’s business managers commonly obtain their event business, and during the decade it went on environment, and you begin to appreciate notifications from multiple sources—their to acquire a series of cellular telephone the magnitude of the impact of corporate custodians, the exchanges, and data ven- and cable TV companies, including McCaw actions and the urgent need to develop dors. The information from custodians may Communications, TCI, and Media One. better ways to deal with them. be incomplete or late, requiring manag- ers to research the information manually After deregulation of the telecom industry from the issuer’s website or company in 1996, AT&T divested NCR again and Today’s Processing press release. Meanwhile, subscribing to spun off Bell Laboratories as Lucent Environment multiple data vendor feeds in order to get Technologies. In 2001, as part of a major a comprehensive and accurate picture of reorganization, it spun off AT&T Wireless, events is an expensive and time-consuming in what was then the world’s largest IPO, Since the turn of the millennium there proposition. along with its cable TV businesses, and both has been a notable uptick in efforts of these newly independent businesses to automate the corporate actions A Taxing Problem subsequently merged with other process. At an industry level, SWIFT Perhaps the hardest part of handling companies. Finally, in 2005, former Baby and the Securities Market Practice corporate actions for many managers Bell SBC Communications, having acquired Groups (SMPGs) have made significant lies with the tax opinions and cost basis most of its sibling companies in the years progress in developing and deploying a information. First, firms need to obtain since divestiture, acquired its parent and standardized communication format, using and interpret the relevant tax opinions— took the AT&T name as well as its historic T ISO 15022, for relaying corporate action no small task in itself. Next, they must (for “telephone”) ticker symbol, coming full messages. Many market participants now determine how to transfer the corporate circle and closing a tumultuous chapter in use standardized electronic messaging, action information to their portfolio the history of American business. but adoption is by no means universal, management systems in alignment with the particularly among the reorganizing tax opinion, so their trading departments Every one of these events involved issuers and companies themselves. can start to take action. multiple corporate actions that affected Indeed, too often the data sent by issuers thousands of investment managers and is in non-standardized formats and may In addition, cost basis information is millions of shareholders. Multiply this be inaccurate, incomplete, or untimely. necessary for reporting gains or losses single example by the
Recommended publications
  • Business Justification
    BUSINESS JUSTIFICATION FOR THE UPDATE OF THE UNIFI (ISO 20022) FINANCIAL REPOSITORY Name of the request: Issuers’ Agents communication for Corporate Actions1. Submitting organization: Euroclear SA/NV 33 Cannon Street London EC4M 5SB. Scope of the registration request: The scope of this business justification is the messages between issuers’ agents and the (I)CSD at which a security is deposited, in the context of corporate actions processing (reorganisations and distributions). The business processes for the processing of a corporate action may be shared between the agent and the (I)CSD, and also involves real movements of securities and cash; the messaging solution must reflect this complexity. Securities within the scope are equities, bonds (including Eurobonds), funds and other equity-like instruments deposited and settled at an (I)CSD. The in-scope processes are represented by the shaded area in the diagrams within this business justification. CSD Client CSD Issuer’s Agent Proposed business processes within the scope are as follows: • Announcement • Election (including actual movement of resources) 1 Subsequent Business Justifications will cover issuers’ agents’ communication for securities movements registration and new issues. 16- ISO20022BJ_IssuersAgentCommunication_approved.doc Produced by Euroclear SA/NV Page 1 • Standing instruction • Distribution by (I)CSD and agent (including removal of resources by (I)CSD and, potentially, agent e.g. clawback or redemption) • Deactivation. Announcement Automation of the corporate action announcement between the issuer’s agent and the (I)CSD leads to quicker and more accurate information being available to the market. Any modelling for this message will undoubtedly start with the elements already included in the MT 564.
    [Show full text]
  • Refinitiv Corporate Actions Methodology
    REFINITIV EQUITY INDICES Corporate Action Methodology April 2020 Published: April 6, 2020 © 2019 Refinitiv Limited. All Rights Reserved. Refinitiv Limited, by publishing this document, does not guarantee that any information contained herein is or will remain accurate or that use of the information will ensure correct and faultless operation of the relevant service or associated equipment. Neither Refinitiv Limited, nor its agents or employees, shall be held liable to any user or end user for any loss or damage (whether direct or indirect) whatsoever resulting from reliance on the information contained herein. This document may not be reproduced, disclosed, or used in whole or part without the prior written consent of Refinitiv. 1 Sensitivity: Confidential Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Corporate Actions ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Cash Dividend .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Special Dividend ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Cash Dividend with Stock Alternative ....................................................................................... 5 1.4 Stock Dividend ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • S&P DJI's Equity Indices Policies and Practices Methodology
    Equity Indices Policies & Practices Methodology August 2021 S&P Dow Jones Indices: Index Methodology Table of Contents Introduction 4 Overview 4 Corporate Action Treatment by Index Categorization 4 Additions and Deletions 5 Mandatory Events 6 Mergers & Acquisitions 6 Reverse Mergers/Takeovers 6 Spin-Offs 7 Treatment of Spin-Offs in Market Capitalization Indices 7 Treatment of Spin-Offs in Certain Non-Market Capitalization Indices 8 Rights Offerings (or “Rights Issues”) 9 S&P DJI’s Calculation of Rights Offerings 9 Non-Market Capitalization Weighted Indices 11 Warrants, Options, Partly Paid Shares, Convertible Bonds, and Other Ineligible Securities & Share Types 11 Non-Mandatory Share and Investable Weight Factor (IWF) Updates 13 Accelerated Implementation Rule 13 Exception to the Accelerated Implementation Rule 13 Announcement Policy 14 IWF Updates 14 Share Updates 15 Rebalancing Guidelines – Share/IWF Reference Date & Freeze Period 15 Certain Share Types and Designations 16 Multiple Share Classes 16 Designated Listings 16 Depositary Receipt Shares 17 Brazil Units 17 Dividends, Stock Splits, and Consolidations 18 Dividends 18 Regional Variations in the Treatment of Cash Dividends 19 Post Ex-date Dividend Adjustment 21 Foreign Exchange Conversions for Dividends 21 Multiple Dividend Distributions on a Single Day 22 S&P Dow Jones Indices: Equity Indices Policies & Practices 1 Dividend Not Quoted Ex by the Exchange 22 Bonus Issues of Shares Not Entitled To Cash Dividend 22 Total Return and Net Return Indices 22 Stock Split and Consolidation
    [Show full text]
  • ICE Futures Europe Corporate Action Policy October 2019
    ICE Futures Europe Corporate Action Policy October 2019 This material may not be reproduced or redistributed in whole or in part without the express prior written consent of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. © Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2013. All Rights Reserved. ICE Futures Europe - Corporate Action Policy Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................2 2.0 DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................................3 3.0 BACKGROUND...................................................................................................................5 4.0 POLICY AND CONVENTIONS...............................................................................................6 4.1 Application of Adjustments .....................................................................................................6 4.2 Adjustment of Lot Size ..........................................................................................................6 4.3 Rounding ............................................................................................................................6 4.4 Equalisation Payments ..........................................................................................................6 4.5 Notification of Corporate Actions .............................................................................................7 4.6 Currency Conversions...........................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Transfer Agent Verification Form
    Transfer Agent Verification Form Completion of this form certifies to FINRA TM notification of a corporate action (e.g., a name change, stock split, and/or spin-off) for an OTC issuer. This form is required to be filled out and submitted by the transfer agent only. Transfer Agent: *Required Field AGENCY NAME:* IS TRANSFER AGENCY A SEC REGISTERED AGENT?* Yes No, please confirm where registered: AGENCY ADDRESS:* AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE:* TITLE:* TELEPHONE:* FACSIMILE: EMAIL:* WEBSITE:* WHERE DID THE AGENT RECEIVE NOTIFICATION FROM? * ISSUER LEGAL COUNSEL OTHER OTC Issuer Requiring Change: *Required Field COMPANY NAME : * ADDRESS: * CITY:* STATE/PROVINCE:* ZIP/POSTAL CODE:* COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION:* IF US, STATE OF INCORPORATION: DATE OF INCORPORATION OR RE-INCORPORATION:*: CONTACT NAME:* TITLE:* TELEPHONE:* FACSIMILE: EMAIL:* Appointment Verification: *Required Field DATE OF APPOINTMENT AS TRANSFER AGENT:* If date of appointment is within last six months, please provide the following information: PRIOR TRANSFER AGENT: DATE RECORDS WERE TRANSFERRED AND RECEIVED FROM PRIOR AGENT: TRANSFER AGENT VERIFICATION FORM REV. (02/14) Page1 of 4 Transaction Options (please fill out all that apply): Stock Splits/Stock Dividends FORWARD SPLIT CUSIP/CINS NUMBER(S): CURRENT: NEW: STOCK SPLIT RATIO: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: STOCK DIVIDEND (or FORWARD SPLIT w/ RECORD DATE) CUSIP/CINS NUMBER(S): CURRENT: RECORD DATE: PAYABLE DATE:** STOCK SPLIT/DIVIDEND RATIO: HAS COMPANY ISSUED NEW SHARES AFTER RECORD DATE? No Yes If yes, please explain: REVERSE SPLIT CUSIP/CINS
    [Show full text]
  • Morningstar Indexes Corporate Actions Methodology
    ? Morningstar Indexes Corporate Actions Methodology Morningstar Indexes Introduction May 2020 Corporate Actions and Adjustments To understand the operational and maintenance aspects of an index, it is imperative to know how Contents adjustments are made for different kinds of corporate actions and index weighting schemes. This document outlines the corporate action policy that Morningstar Equity Indexes follows consistently and 1 Introduction 1 Cash Distribution transparently. 2 Variations in the Treatment of Cash Dividends by Region Cash Distribution 5 Rights Offering 7 Spin-Off Cash Dividend or Ordinary Cash Dividend is a distribution of a portion of a company's earnings to its 8 Share Outstanding and Free Float shareholders at regular intervals, typically on a quarterly, semiannual, or annual basis, and quoted in per Factors Updates 9 Mergers and Acquisitions share amounts. For index calculation, it is not treated as a corporate action and thus affects total returns 11 Splits and Reverse Splits and net returns but not price returns. 11 Stock Distribution 12 Bankruptcy and Financial Distress 12 Delisting Special Dividend is a nonrecurring cash distribution of a company’s earnings or assets to shareholders 12 Stock Suspension and is treated as a corporate action with price and divisor adjustments. It is also quoted in dividends per 13 Rebalancing share. For index calculation, the price on the day before the ex-date is adjusted for the special dividend 13 Exchange Closures 13 Snap Announcements and thus affects all three variants of indexes. It results in a stock's price being reduced by the amount at the opening of the effective date.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Executive Legal Guide
    Chief Executive Legal Guide 1 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 100, Greenwich, CT 06830 Telephone: (203) 930-2700 • Fax: (203) 930-2701 www.chiefexecutive.net/research Marshall Cooper: Chief Executive Officer Wayne Cooper: Chairman David Beck: Senior Vice President Michael Bamberger: Vice President of Research Chris Horner: Editor Elayne Demby: Editor Paula Santonocito: Editor Monique Nijhout: Desktop Editor © 2012 Chief Executive Group. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electronic or mechanical, without prior written permission of the Chief Executive Group, Greenwich, CT USA. CHAPTER 6 CORPORATE LAW Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Corporate Governance Steven P. Buffone, Partner Katherine A. McCord, Associate Mergers and Acquisitions Scott J. Calfas, Partner Personal Liability Mark S. Lahive, Partner Securities Law Peter J. Hanlon, Partner Peter W. Wardle, Partner Michael H. Davis, Associate PART I. PERSONAL LIABILITY OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS WHAT IS AT STAKE Although corporations are recognized as distinct legal entities, officers and directors should realize that stockholders, law enforcement, the media, and the general public all share the view that corporations don’t break laws, people do. Recent history, starting with WorldCom and Enron and continuing through more recent turmoil within financial institutions, has seen officers and directors judged harshly and found person- ally liable for misdeeds that involved not only violations of law and fraud, but also breaches of fiduciary duties. While such behavior is not, hopefully, a likelihood for most corporate officers and directors, the current climate requires officers and directors, whether serving a corporation with thousands of shareholders or just a few, to be particularly vigilant with respect to their duties and obligations.
    [Show full text]
  • ISO 15022 Corporate Actions Market Practice
    Corporate Actions Market Practice Version: 6.0 Publication Date: November 2016 Author(s): ISITC Corporate Actions Working Group DISCLAIMER This market practice document has been developed by the International Securities Association for Institutional Trade Communication (ISITC) as a statement of professional practices recommended by ISITC. Institutions providing the information recommended in this document will benefit from the efficiencies inherent in a more automated transaction process. Although all institutions are encouraged to act consistently with this document, none are required to do so, and a failure to do so is not, in and of itself, evidence of negligent or inappropriate conduct. Corporate Actions Market Practice Final November 2016 Document History Version # Change Date Description of Change Page 1.0 Oct 31, 2007 First Draft 1.1 Nov 7, 2007 Define Roles and Actors. Review sequence and activity diagrams 1.2 Nov 19, 2007 Updated sequence and activity diagrams. Added definitions for Roles. Reviewed business elements 1.3 Nov 20, 2007 Updated sequence and activity diagrams. Updated sections 2.0 and 3.0 1.4 Feb 6, 2008 Updates to the activity diagrams and Message Usage Rules from the Dec conference. 1.5 March 10, 2008 Inserted Market Practice and Message Usage Rules for Announcements/564 1.6 March 17, 2008 Updated Market Practice and Message Usage Rules for Announcements/564 and added MP and MU for Payments/566 1.6a April 28, 2008 Updated format of Market Practice and Message Usage Sections 1.7 May 2008 Inserted new format of MP and Message Usage sections. Updated Background and Scope. 1.8 August 2008 Updated from June conference.
    [Show full text]
  • 238 References: Financial Management by Khan Jain
    References: Financial Management by Khan Jain Financial Management by I. M. Pandey Financial Management by Prasanna Chandra Financial Management by Shashi Gupta and Neeti Gupta Financial Management by Rustogi SIKKIM MANIPAL UNIVERSITY 238 Financial Management Subject code : MB0029 Contents Unit 1 Financial Management 1 Unit 2 Financial Planning 15 Unit 3 Time Value of Money 34 Unit 4 Valuation of Bonds and shares 50 Unit 5 Cost of Capital 72 Unit 6 Leverage 88 Unit 7 Capital Structure 101 Unit 8 Capital Budgeting 113 Edition: Fall 2008 Contents Unit 9 Risk Analysis in Capital Budgeting 147 Unit 10 Capital Rationing 167 Unit 11 Working Capital management 174 Unit 12 Cash Management 190 Unit 13 Inventory Management 204 Unit 14 Receivables Management 218 Unit 15 Dividend Decision 231 Edition: Fall 2008 BKID – B0671 Dr. K. Jayakumar Vice Chancellor Sikkim Manipal University of Health, Medical, and Technological studies Prof. Nandagopal V. B. Director and Dean Sikkim Manipal University of Health, Medical, and Technological studies. Board of Studies Dr. T. V. Narasimha Rao Prof. K. V. Varambally Professor. Manipal Universal Learning Director, Manipal Institute of Management, Manipal Ms. Vimala Parthasarathy Mr. Shankar Jagannathan Asst. Professor. Sikkim Manipal University of Health, Former Group Treasurer Medical and Technological studies. Wipro Technologies Limited, Bangalore Ms. Sadhana Dash Mr. Abraham Mathews Senor Manager HR Chief Financial Officer Microsoft India corporation ( Pvt) limited Infosys BPO, Bangalore Mr. Pankaj Khanna Director, HR, Fidelity Mutual Fund Content Preparation Team Content Reviewed and Edited by 1. Prof V. Narayanan Dr. T. V. Narasimha Rao Dean, M.S. Ramaiah Institute of Management, Bangalore Professor.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Equity & Debt Corporate Actions Data
    Canadian Equity & Debt Corporate Actions Data Description Available Through CDSX® Entitlements Data Feed, the CDSX Entitlements Data Feed is a daily field-based text batch file which provides details related to 54 entitlement event types, including comprehensive corporate action information, for Canadian equity and debt securities. The data feed provided by CDS Innovations Inc. (a subsidiary of The Canadian Depository for Securities Limited), is available in two forms: 7040 file which reports on active events and the 7041 file which reports all modifications of event information for the current day. Benefits • Reduces risk of error by eliminating need Features to re-key information • Entitlements data available directly from • Comprehensive data reduces the need for Canada’s national securities depository multiple data sources • Covers both debt and equity securities • Field-based format promotes straight- through processing • Customizable for entitlement subsets for only Distribution, Mandatory or Voluntary events FREQUENCY • Daily batch updates in a field-based text format Daily • Mandatory, voluntary and distribution corporate actions are covered, including: • purchase offers and plans of arrangement DELIVERY • interest payments SFTP • maturities • stock splits and consolidations • rights and warrant issues FORMAT • spin-offs Text (.txt) • cash and stock dividends • redemptions • mergers Entitlement Coverage Distribution events (with no options) CODE Name CODE Name APN Other asset-backed (payable date with no write down) RWS Rights or warrants distribution APW Other asset-backed (payable date with write down) SDC Stock distribution (Canadian listed) ARN Other asset-backed (record date with no write down) SDI Stock distribution (interlisted) ARW Other asset-backed (record date with write down) SDU Stock distribution (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bond Index Methodology
    BOND INDEX METHODOLOGY Version 1.1 24 September 2019 2 Bond Index Methodology TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1 INDEX CALCULATION ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Index Types .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Calculation Formulas ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.2.1 Direct Reinvestment Index Formula ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.2 Periodic Reinvestment Formula .................................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2.3 Definitions of variables.................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NYSE Indices - Corporate Action Handling Guide
    NYSE Indices - Corporate Action Handling Guide Version 1.0 Valid from March 21, 2018 Contents Version History: ......................................................................................................................... 2 1. Corporate Actions .............................................................................................................. 3 1.1 General ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2. Removal of constituents ................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Split-up /spin off............................................................................................................... 4 1.4. Dividends ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.5. Rights issues and other rights ........................................................................................... 5 1.6 Bonus issues, stock splits and reverse stock splits ........................................................... 6 1.7 Changes in number of shares outstanding ........................................................................ 6 2. Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................. 7 Version History: Version 1.0 (Effective March 21, 2018) The NYSE Indices - Corporate Action Handling Guide is being released to provide
    [Show full text]