DOCSLIB.ORG

Final 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 150 Study Update Noise

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 150 Study Update Noise CHAPTER 1 Introduction This report documents the results of the second and final phase of the San Francisco International Airport Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 150 Study Update: the Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Update was conducted in accordance with 14 CFR Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning [I-1]1. The first step in the update process was to develop maps depicting existing and anticipated future aircraft noise exposure (assuming that no changes to the existing Noise Compatibility Program were implemented) and to estimate the effects of that noise in terms of the number of people, households, and noise-sensitive land uses exposed to aircraft noise of Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) 65 decibels (dB) and higher. The noise exposure maps and the assumptions used in developing the maps are documented in the report 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 150 Study Update, Noise Exposure Map Report, San Francisco International Airport, August 2015 [I-2]. The NEMs were accepted by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on January 29, 2016 (See Appendix A for related correspondence). 1.1 Airport Setting San Francisco International Airport (SFO or the Airport) is located in unincorporated San Mateo County, California. The land and Airport is owned and operated by the City and County of San Francisco (CCSF) by and through the San Francisco Airport Commission (Airport Commission). SFO is located approximately 13 miles south of downtown San Francisco and occupies about 5,100 acres of which about 2,200 are land.2 As shown on Exhibit 1-1, the active operations area at SFO is bordered by the San Francisco Bay to the east and U.S. Highway 101 (U.S. 101) to the west and south, and Interstate 380 (I-380) to the north. The Airport is surrounded by the cities of Millbrae and Burlingame (to the south), San Bruno (to the west), and South San Francisco (to the north). San Bruno Mountain is located about two miles north of the Airport; Sweeney Ridge / San Andreas Lake is located about 1.5 miles west of the Airport. These two mountains funnel coastal winds southeast towards San Mateo County and the Airport. The surrounding terrain and direction of the winds are primary drivers for the direction of aircraft operations and associated noise contours. 1 See Chapter 6 of this report for a full list of references. 2 Remaining 2,900 acres of SFO property is in San Francisco Bay waters. San Francisco International Airport 1-1 ESA / 120832 14 CFR Part 150 Study Update Noise Compatibility Program July 2018 1. Introduction 1.2 Summary of Aviation Demand Forecasts 14 CFR Part 150 requires that noise exposure maps (NEMs) be prepared for two scenarios— existing conditions and conditions 5 years into the future. Each map reflects the annual average number of daily aircraft operations for the specified year. Typically, data for the most recent full calendar year for which data are available at the time the maps are prepared are used to represent existing conditions. In this 14 CFR Part 150 Study Update, operations data for calendar year 2013 were used to represent the baseline (2014) condition (2014, which is the year of the submittal of the NEMs to the FAA) and forecast operations in 2019 were used to represent 5-year future conditions. The data used to develop the 2014 NEMs are representative of the existing conditions in 2015 and the data used to develop the 2019 NEMs are representative of the future five-year forecast condition in 2020. The most recent FAA-approved aviation activity forecasts are documented in the report San Francisco International Airport Forecast Update (the 2014 Forecast) by Landrum & Brown [I-3], which was approved by the FAA on June 9, 2014. The 2014 Forecast provides baseline (2013) data and projections of annual passenger enplanements, air cargo volumes, aircraft operations, and commercial aircraft fleet mix that reflect market-driven demand for air service. The 2014 Forecast is “unconstrained” and as such does not take facility constraints or other outside limiting factors into consideration. The 2014 Forecast provides SFO and the FAA with an adaptive framework for long range planning. Table 1-1 presents historical aircraft operations data for SFO. Total aircraft operations at SFO increased from 379,500 in 2007 to 421,400 in 2013, representing an average annual growth rate of 1.8 percent. During this time period, commercial passenger operations experienced the fastest growth, with an average annual growth rate of 2.7 percent. Military, cargo, air taxi and general aviation operations experienced decreases during the period. TABLE 1-1 HISTORICAL AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS AT SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – 2007-2013 Calendar Commercial Total General Year Passenger All - Cargo Air Taxi Commercial Aviation Military Total 2007 330,114 7,140 20,463 357,717 19,150 2,633 379,500 2008 344,834 6,420 18,303 369,557 15,478 2,675 387,710 2009 342,658 7,084 14,938 364,860 12,293 2,778 379,751 2010 349,420 7,036 15,512 371,968 12,570 2,710 387,248 2011 365,372 6,782 16,059 388,213 12,711 2,640 403,564 2012 387,416 6,274 15,596 409,286 12,561 2,719 424,566 2013 386,416 5,920 14,475 406,811 12,213 2,376 421,400 Compound Annual Growth Rate 2007-2013 2.7% -3.1% -5.6% 2.2% -7.2% -1.7% 1.8% SOURCES: Landrum & Brown, San Francisco International Airport Forecast Update, April 2014, as approved by the FAA on June 9, 2014; and SFO Year End Traffic Report, CY2013. San Francisco International Airport 1-2 ESA / 120832 14 CFR Part 150 Study Update Noise Compatibility Program July 2018 1. Introduction This page intentionally left blank San Francisco International Airport 1-4 ESA / 120832 14 CFR Part 150 Study Update Noise Compatibility Program July 2018 1. Introduction Table 1-2 presents projected aircraft operations data for SFO. Total operations at the airport are expected to grow at an average rate of 2.0 percent annually over the forecast period, increasing from an estimated 421,400 operations in 2013 to 625,620 operations in 2033. Commercial passenger and air taxi operations are anticipated to experience the fastest growth, with average growth rates of 2.0 percent and 3.5 percent, respectively. Military operations at SFO are not anticipated to grow during the forecast period while general aviation operations are expected to grow modestly at an average annual growth rate of 0.5 percent. TABLE 1-2 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS FORECAST FOR SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – 2013-2033 Calendar Commercial Total General Year Passenger All - Cargo Air Taxi Commercial Aviation Military Total 2013 386,416 5,920 14,475 406,811 12,213 2,376 421,400 Forecast 2014 389,800 5,800 15,000 410,600 12,300 2,400 425,300 2015 393,400 5,700 15,500 414,600 12,360 2,400 429,360 2016 397,600 5,900 16,000 419,500 12,420 2,400 434,320 2017 402,500 6,100 16,600 425,200 12,480 2,400 440,080 2018 407,800 6,200 17,200 431,200 12,540 2,400 446,140 2019 413,500 6,400 17,800 437,700 12,600 2,400 452,700 2020 423,800 6,600 18,400 448,800 12,660 2,400 463,860 2021 432,100 6,700 19,000 457,800 12,720 2,400 472,920 2022 441,900 6,900 19,700 468,500 12,780 2,400 483,680 2023 451,900 7,000 20,400 479,300 12,840 2,400 494,540 2028 508,300 7,700 22,100 538,100 13,140 2,400 553,640 2033 572,500 8,400 28,800 609,700 13,520 2,400 625,620 Compound Annual Growth Rate 2013-2033 2.0% 1.8% 3.5% 2.0% 0.5% 0.0% 2.0% SOURCE: Landrum & Brown, San Francisco International Airport Forecast Update, April 2014, as approved by the FAA on June 9, 2014. 1.3 Airport Noise Compatibility Planning Overview The CCSF by and through the Airport Commission has a long history of implementing aircraft noise abatement and mitigation measures at SFO. The Airport Commission prepared a 14 CFR Part 150 Study for SFO in the early 1980s. The 14 CFR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) was adapted from the 1980 Joint Land Use Study Final Technical Report [I-4] which was approved by the Joint Powers Board in March 1980. The NEMs included in the 14 CFR Part 150 Study were accepted by the FAA on January 25, 1983 and the NCP was approved by the FAA on September 7, 1983. At the FAA’s request, the Airport Commission updated the 1983 NEM document in 1995 to reflect changes that had occurred at the Airport and in the Airport environs. The 1995 NEM update was accepted by the FAA as complying with 14 CFR Part 150 on May 17, 1996. The Airport Commission prepared a subsequent NEM Update in 2001; the 2001 NEM Update was San Francisco International Airport 1-5 ESA / 120832 14 CFR Part 150 Study Update Noise Compatibility Program July 2018 1. Introduction accepted by the FAA on July 17, 2002. The existing conditions NEM in the 2002 NEM Update represents calendar year 2001 conditions and the future-year NEM represents projected conditions in calendar year 2006. 1.4 Updated Noise Exposure Maps In May 2014, the Airport Commission retained a team of consultants to assist in updating the SFO 14 CFR Part 150 NEMs and NCP in accordance with 14 CFR Part 150.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Goga Wrfr.Pdf
    The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top: Golden Gate Bridge, Don Weeks Middle: Rodeo Lagoon, Joel Wagner Bottom: Crissy Field, Joel Wagner ii CONTENTS Contents, iii List of Figures, iv Executive Summary, 1 Introduction, 7 Water Resources Planning, 9 Location and Demography, 11 Description of Natural Resources, 12 Climate, 12 Physiography, 12 Geology, 13 Soils, 13
    [Show full text]
  • 3.1 Land Use
    3.1 Land Use This section presents the environmental setting and impact analysis of land use in the Pacifica Planning Area. Effects on nearby land uses created by other potential effects of the proposed Plan, such as noise and air quality, are dealt with in those sections. Environmental Setting PHYSICAL SETTING The City of Pacifica is located in San Mateo County, and is bordered to the west by the Pacific coast. It is part of the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose metropolitan area, and is approximately 13 miles south of downtown San Francisco, 40 miles northwest of San Jose, and six miles west of San Francisco International Airport. It shares a northern border with Daly City, and eastern borders with South San Francisco and San Bruno. To the east, and to the south, are unincorporated portions of San Mateo County and the ridges of the Coast Range. Much of the land to the southeast and south is preserved as units of the Golden Gate National Recreational Area, the State and County park systems, and protected watersheds. Rural and agricultural land is also prevalent south of the city. Land west of SR 1, along with Shelldance Nursery and some lands to the south, is part of the State- designated Coastal Zone. Existing Land Use The existing land use pattern is shown in Figure 3.1-1 and summarized in Table 3.1-1. The most common land use in the Planning Area is open space, covering nearly half (3,614 acres) of the total land area. Another 361 acres are used for agriculture, and 1,204 acres remain vacant or undeveloped.
    [Show full text]
  • PENINSULA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN Final Environmental Impact Report
    San Francisco Planning Department PENINSULA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN Final Environmental Impact Report San Francisco Planning Department File No. 96.222E State Clearinghouse No. 98082030 Draft EIR Publication Date: December 18, 1999 Draft EIR Public Hearing Date: February 1, 2000 (in San Mateo) and February 3, 2000 (in San Francisco) Draft EIR Public Comment Period: December 18, 1999 through February 18, 2000 EIR Certification Date: January 11, 2001 This report has been printed on post-consumer recycled paper San Francisco Planning Department PENINSULA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN Final Environmental Impact Report San Francisco Planning Department File No. 96.222E State Clearinghouse No. 98082030 Draft EIR Publication Date: December 18, 1999 Draft EIR Public Hearing Date: February 1, 2000 (in San Mateo) and February 3, 2000 (in San Francisco) Draft EIR Public Comment Period: December 18, 1999 through February 18, 2000 EIR Certification Date: January 11, 2001 Changes from the text of the Draft EIR are indicated by a dot ( ) This report has been printed on post-consumer recycled paper 225 Bush Street 315 Washington Street 700 University Avenue 4221 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1700 Suite 102 Suite 130 Suite 480 San Francisco, Oakland, Sacramento, Los Angeles, California California California California 94104 94607 95825 90010 (415) 896-5900 (510) 839-5066 (916) 564-4500 (213) 933-6111 930385 TABLE OF CONTENTS PENINSULA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN EIR Page I. SUMMARY I-1 A. Management Plan Description I-1 B. Fifield/Cahill Ridge Trail (Project-Level Analysis) I-3 C. Principal Environmental Effects I-3 D. Mitigation Measures I-11 E. Management Plan Alternatives I-13 F.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County Parks Vegetation Resources
    San Mateo County Parks Vegetation Resources Prepared for County of San Mateo Environmental Services Agency Parks & Recreation Division by Rana Creek Habitat Restoration March 2002 SAN MATEO COUNTY PARKS VEGETATION RESOURCES 1 1. INTRODUCTION The San Mateo County Department of Parks and Recreation operates seventeen parks in San Mateo County. These parks contain a diverse group of plant communities, reflecting the wide variation in elevation, marine influence, soils, and other environmental factors across the San Francisco Peninsula as well as differences in land use and fire history. Several plant communities within the parks are rare in California, including coastal salt marsh, serpentine bunchgrass grassland, coastal prairie, and maritime chaparral. In addition, many of the parks provide habitat for rare species, including eight Federally Endangered and seven Federally Threatened plants and animals known to occur within the park system. The purpose of this document is to summarize and update available vegetation information for thirteen County parks. This task includes: 1) classifying and mapping plant communities; 2) assessing the condition of the vegetation; 3) mapping non-native plant infestations; and 4) mapping known locations of sensitive and endangered plant and animal species. The vegetation maps and plant community descriptions herein will provide the foundation for a Vegetation Management Plan. The Vegetation Management Plan, in turn, will establish vegetation management objectives, develop Best Management Practices, and identify opportunities for pilot projects, collaborative projects, and community involvement. The thirteen parks described in this document are listed below. Pescadero Creek, Sam MacDonald, and Memorial Parks are treated as a single park complex. Coyote Point Recreation Area Memorial Park Crystal Springs Park Pescadero Creek Park Edgewood Preserve Sam McDonald Park Fitzgerald Marine Reserve San Bruno Mountain State and County Park Flood Park San Pedro Park Huddart Park Wunderlich Park Junipero Serra Park 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Parknews U.S
    National Park Service ParkNews U.S. Department of the Interior March, April, May 2006 The Quarterly Magazine of the National Parks at the Golden Gate Lands in Motion This year marks the centennial of the great earthquake and fire that so dramatically changed the face of San Francisco. In this issue, we explore the histo- ry, mystery, and consequences of our geologic underpinnings, examples of which can be found throughout the Golden Gate National Parks. For the last 25 million years (give or take a few million), our national park neighbor to the south, Pinnacles National Monument, has crept closer to us, carried northward along the west flank of the San Andreas Fault. Meanwhile, our park neighbor to the north, Point Reyes National Seashore, continues to drift away from us aboard the P R A H T Pacific Plate. For more about A D N E R B what it means to ride a major faultline, start with “Hiking the Seafloor,” p. 3. Our thanks to Roxi Farwell, NPS Interpretive Ranger, Marin Headlands, Y E L E K R E who contributed to this introduction. B C U , Y R A R B I L T F O R C N A B The Geology of Fort Funston Walk to the Farallones? Millennia ago, that would have been possible. Today, Fort Funston’s cliffs allow us to read the geologic record of San Francisco’s shifting shoreline. 4 The Camp No One Used After the earthquake of 1906, all the city’s residents suffered, but some G P received much less help than others.
    [Show full text]
  • In San Mateo County
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY FOR GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA IN SAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY FOR GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA IN SAN MATEO COUNTY SWEENEY RIDGE RANCHO CORRAL DE TIERRA (AND THE MONTARA LIGHTHOUSE STATION) MORI POINT PHLEGER ESTATE MILAGRA RIDGE San Mateo County Historical Association Mitchell P. Postel, President 2010 HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY FOR GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA IN SAN MATEO COUNTY About the cover: The historic discovery of San Francisco Bay by Captain Gaspar de Portolá on November 4, 1769, by Morton Kunstler. The original painting is now in the San Mateo County History Museum’s “Nature’s Bounty” gallery. The discovery was made from Sweeney Ridge, now part of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE vii HOW TO USE THIS STUDY x PART I: INTRODUCTION 1 Physical Setting 1 Native People (Contextual) 5 Spanish and Mexican Eras (Contextual) 10 The American Period Begins (Contextual) 13 Into the Modern Era (Contextual) 17 Endnotes 20 PART II: SWEENEY RIDGE 25 Ohlones (Contextual) 25 The Aramai 26 Spanish Interest in Alta California (Contextual) 29 The Discover of San Francisco Bay 35 Historical Significance of the Discovery of San Francisco Bay 40 Spanish Occupation of the San Francisco Peninsula (Contextual) 43 The Mission Outpost Beneath Sweeney Ridge (Contextual) 49 The Mexican Era (Contextual) 55 Francisco Sanchez and Rancho San Pedro 58 American Period and Sanchez’s Rancho San Pedro
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Mounds to Cul-De-Sacs: the Cultural Landscape of San Pedro Valley, Pacifica, California
    Shell Mounds to Cul-de-Sacs: the Cultural Landscape of San Pedro Valley, Pacifica, California A research report submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Geography by John Culp San Francisco, California November, 2002 Copyright by John H. Culp 2002 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read Shell Mounds to Cul-de-Sacs: the Cultural Landscape of San Pedro Valley, Pacifica, California, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a research paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree: Master of Arts in Geography at San Francisco State University. ____________________________________________________________ Nancy Wilkinson Professor of Geography ____________________________________________________________ Jerry Davis Professor of Geography Shell Mounds to Cul-de-Sacs: the Cultural Landscape of San Pedro Valley, Pacifica, California John H. Culp San Francisco State University 2002 Abstract: Even ordinary elements of the American cultural landscape have unique histories that have helped create their present form. San Pedro Valley, a suburban landscape since the 1950's, has evolved from a number of distinct different landscapes, a few small relics of which can still be found if one takes the time to search them out. This paper traces the development of the cultural landscape of San Pedro Valley from the valley's occupation by native Americans up to the present. The evolution of the landscape is divided into several phases: the Ohlone Landscape, the Mission Period Landscape, the Rancho Landscape, the Truck Farming Landscape, the Early Suburban Landscape, the Modern Suburban Landscape, and Today.
    [Show full text]
  • Conclusions and Recommendations
    CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SWEENEY RIDGE THE ROLE OF PORTOLÀ The “Historical Significance of the Discovery of San Francisco Bay” chapter of the Sweeney Ridge section of this study makes the case that Gaspar de Portolá’s discovery of the San Francisco Bay was one of the most important events of California and, in- deed, western history. The find became a central consideration among the Spanish as they began colonization of Alta California. It marked the beginning of the end for the hegemony of the native Californians, who had been here, inhabiting the land without interference, for thousands of years. When one considers the meaningful efforts the National Park Service has expended on the Anza Trail, it becomes a question - - why hasn’t Portolá received this kind of attention? Portolá was first to enter Alta California by land. His expedition resulted in the initiation of the Spanish settlement here. Anza’s exploration was certainly as amazing, considering the hardships of his overland journeys. His trail blazing tried to link Alta California with New Spain. In his second expedition, he took with him the original settlers destined for San Francisco. However, within five years his Anza Trail was closed by the Yuma Indians. Portolá not only already discovered the San Francisco Bay but had additionally helped the Franciscans establish the San Diego and Monterey missions. It seems that his legacy should be as much understood as Anza’s. At Sweeney Ridge the National Park Service possesses the very spot at which the mo- mentous discovery was made. While surrounded by urban growth, the Ridge remains open space and available for a variety of interpretive projects.
    [Show full text]
  • The San Andreas and San Gregorio Fault Systems in San Mateo County Selected Field Trip Destinations in the Northern Santa Cruz Mountains and Along the Coast
    The San Andreas and San Gregorio Fault Systems in San Mateo County Selected Field Trip Destinations in the Northern Santa Cruz Mountains and Along the Coast Trip Highlights: San Andreas Fault along the I-280 and Skyline Boulevard corridor, and at Mussel Rock Park; Calero Limestone at Rockaway State Beach; Devil’s Slide; Montara Mountain granite; Seal Cove Fault, the San Gregorio Fault System, and geologic structures exposed along the coast at Montara State Beach, James V. Fitzgerald Marine Reserve, and at Pillar Point on Half Moon Bay This field trip focuses on the geology in the northern Santa Cruz Mountains and the coast in San Mateo County. Selected stops highlight landscape features and bedrock along the San Andreas and San Gregorio fault zones, and other localities that reveal information about the geologic evolution of the landscape. The field trip follows a loop route that begins near Crystal Springs Reservoir on I-280. The route follows I-280 and Highway 35 (Skyline Boulevard) north, then follows Highway 1 south along the San Mateo Coast before returning east on Highway 92. back to I-280. Figure 8-1. Map of the Peninsula showing major faults in the northern Santa Cruz Mountains in San Mateo County. Stops include: A) I-280 Vista Point, 1) Filoli Center, 2) Pulgas Water Temple, 3) Crystal Springs Dam, 4) I-280 Rest Area, 5) Milagro Ridge, 6) Mussel Rock Park, 7) Pacifica Quarry, 8) San Pedro Mountain and Devil’s Slide, 9) Montara Mountain, 10) Montara Beach, 11) James V. Fitzgerald Marine Preserve, 12) Half Moon Bay Airport, and 13) Pillar Point and Mavericks.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Gate National Recreation Area
    National Recreation Area National Park Service Golden Gate California U.S. Department of the Interior Web Edition ill Elder ill Elder PS PS/W PS/W PS/Will Elder N N N N A swordfern frond unfolds at Muir Woods. The view frofromm Mount Tamalpais,l p looking northeast to Bolinas Ridge. Young visitors examine the hidden world of Golden Gate. Activities for children and The Presidio’s former enlisted men’s barracks date from the 1890s. Along with Left:Left: Blue heron. families are available at park visitor centers. echoes of San Francisco’s military past, the Presidio has much to offer recreation lovers. Top: Golden Gate Bridge from Crissy Field. hether you are a visitor to the Bay Area or a lifelong resident, Golden Gate National Recreation Area begins where the Pacific Ocean meets To make the most of your visit to Golden Gate it is a good idea to plan your Golden Gate National Recreation Area offers you experiences you San Francisco Bay—but it does not end there. “If we in the Congress do not time. Use the activity chart below or chart your own course. Whatever path Wcan find nowhere else. This national park area has some world act,” warned U.S. Rep. Philip Burton in 1972, “the majestic area where sea you choose to follow, let Golden Gate enliven your senses: sun-baked scents renowned destinations—Alcatraz and Muir Woods, for example—as well as and bay and land meet in a glorious symphony of nature will be doomed.” of sage and bay laurel, cool morning fog, waves crashing on the headlands, some places where you might not encounter another human being.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Fall of 1769, Spanish Army Captain Gaspar De Portolá's Party Discovered
    SWEENEY RIDGE SWEENEY RIDGE n the fall of 1769, Spanish Army Captain Gaspar de Portolá’s party discovered the San Francisco Bay from Sweeney Ridge in present-day San Mateo County. The Imomentous occasion that would forever change the history of the West Coast of what became the United States was not immediately recognized as such through European eyes. Alta California would in fact remain a remote place for another 80 years. Nevertheless, the San Francisco Bay Area, a place that saw little or no change for thousands of years, would, from this point forward, be subject to constant transforma- tion, despite its isolation. The people who inhabited the area near Sweeney Ridge were the Aramai of the Ohlone people.1 They would be among those whose world changed the fastest. THE OHLONES (CONTEXTUAL) Long before Portolá, the first of the Spanish to write about the people we now call Ohlones, were members of the Sebastian Vizcaíno expedition of 1602. Three ships with 200 men aboard left Acapulco on May 5 and, after spending some time at Cabo San Lucas, arrived at San Diego on November 10. They reached Monterey on Decem- ber 16 and spent nearly two weeks there among the Ohlones. Vizcaíno and members of his party were impressed with the place and had favorable things to write about the native people. In a letter to the King of Spain, Felipe III, Vizcaíno himself wrote: “The area is very populated by people whom I considered to be meek, gentle, quiet and quite amenable to conversion to Catholicism and to becoming subjects of your Maj- esty.”2 Despite Vizcaíno’s enthusiasm, more than 16 decades would elapse before the Span- ish became serious about colonization in the lands that belonged to the Ohlones, the people who inhabited the San Francisco Peninsula, Santa Clara Valley, the East Bay, Santa Cruz Mountains, Monterey Bay and the Salinas Valley.3 Ohlones composed over 50 local tribes who lived in many more villages.
    [Show full text]
  • The San Andreas Fault in the San Francisco Bay Area, California: a Geology Fieldtrip Guidebook to Selected Stops on Public Lands
    The San Andreas Fault In The San Francisco Bay Area, California: A Geology Fieldtrip Guidebook To Selected Stops On Public Lands By Philip W. Stoffer U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005-1127 2005 U.S. Department of Interior U.S. Geological Survey ABSTRACT: This guidebook contains a series of geology fieldtrips with selected destinations along the San Andreas Fault in part of the region that experienced surface rupture during the Great San Francisco Earthquake of 1906. Introductory materials present general information about the San Andreas Fault System, landscape features, and ecological factors associated with faults in the South Bay, Santa Cruz Mountains, the San Francisco Peninsula, and the Point Reyes National Seashore regions. Trip stops include roadside areas and recommended hikes along regional faults and to nearby geologic and landscape features that provide opportunities to make casual observations about the geologic history and landscape evolution. Destinations include the sites along the San Andreas and Calaveras faults in the San Juan Bautista and Hollister region. Stops on public land along the San Andreas Fault in the Santa Cruz Mountains in Santa Clara and Santa Cruz counties include in the Loma Prieta summit area, Forest of Nicene Marks State Park, Lexington County Park, Sanborn County Park, Castle Rock State Park, and the Mid Peninsula Open Space Preserve. Destinations on the San Francisco Peninsula and along the coast in San Mateo County include the Crystal Springs Reservoir area, Mussel Rock Park, and parts of Golden Gate National Recreation Area, with additional stops associated with the San Gregorio Fault system at Montara State Beach, the James F.
    [Show full text]