DOCSLIB.ORG

Deninu KUE FIRST NATION P.O. BOX 1899 FORT RESOLUTION, NT X0E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Deninu KUE FIRST NATION P.O. BOX 1899 FORT RESOLUTION, NT X0E 0M0 (867) 394-4335 FAX (867) 394-5122 [email protected] Catherine Fairbairn Environmental Assessment Officer Mackenzie Valley Review Board 2nd floor, Scotia Building, 5102 50th Ave Yellowknife, NT X1A 2R3 Email: [email protected] July 4, 2019 Re: EA1819-01 – Diavik Diamond Mines Inc. – Depositing Processed Kimberlite into Pits and Underground. Review Board Information Requests to Parties. Dear Ms. Fairbairn, The Deninu Kue First Nation (DKFN) is pleased to provide the following response to the Mackenzie Valley Review Board’s information requests to parties regarding the proposal by Diavik Diamond Mine Inc. (Diavik) to put and store processed kimberlite in pits and underground mine workings and its potential adverse impact on people and the environment. Should you require any clarification on our response please contact our technical advisor, Dr. Marc d’Entremont, at [email protected] or 250-656-0127. Sincerely, Chief Louis Balsillie cc. Richard Simon, DKFN Resource Management Coordinator Dr. Marc d’Entremont, LGL Limited (DKFN Technical Advisor) DKFN Response to MVRB IRs (EA1819-01) Information Request No. 1 Source: Mackenzie Valley Review Board Subject: Potential impacts to cultural use of Lac de Gras Area Preamble: As described in the 1999 Comprehensive Study Report for the Diavik Mine, "(t)here is wide- spread concern that traditions and customs are not practiced as they once were, contributing to a lack of common understanding and connection, of shared beliefs and values" (PR#29)3. The Comprehensive Study Report also states "[t]he land gives a sense of place and identity, provides the context for expression, shapes values and beliefs, and influences customs and practices". The Review Board understands the importance of land and the continuation of cultural use to Indigenous wellbeing. The Review Board also heard during scoping that potential impacts of the project on cultural use should be carefully considered. The current closure plan for the Diavik Mine is to fill the empty pits and underground mine workings with freshwater and reconnect them to Lac de Gras once water quality is safe for aquatic life, fish, and fish habitat. The Review Board is assessing the impact of adding processed kimberlite to the pits and underground mine workings before they are filled with freshwater and reconnected to Lac de Gras. Questions: 1. Please describe how your group used the Lac de Gras area culturally (including the hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and travel) before mining started there. 2. Please describe how your group would use and feel about the Lac de Gras area under the following scenarios: a. reconnecting empty pits and underground mine workings with Lac de Gras at closure (that is, Diavik’s current closure plan for the mine), b. putting processed kimberlite into the pits and underground mine workings before reconnecting them to Lac de Gras (that is, the proposed activities for this environmental assessment), c. putting processed kimberlite into the pits and underground mine workings and not reconnecting them with Lac de Gras. DKFN Response: 1. The Deninu Kue First Nation use of the Lac de Gras area is presented in the Deninu K’ue Ethno-history Report1. A copy of this report was submitted to the public record during the environmental assessment review of the Gahcho Kue mine (De Beers) and the Jay Project (Dominion Diamond). A copy of this report is included in this information request response. 2. Fully understanding how the DKFN membership would use and feel about the Lac de Gras area under the various scenarios will require a consultation process that fully respects the Aboriginal and Treaty rights of our members. This would involve gathering information from members and seeking their opinion on the various scenarios. Sufficient time would be required for this to be a meaningful exercise; however, this time is not provided in the 1 Vanden Berg, L. 2012. Deninu K’ue Ethno-history Report. Vanden Berg and Associates, Sidney BC. 435 pp. 2 DKFN Response to MVRB IRs (EA1819-01) current version of the Review Board’s workplan for this project review. Therefore, we are not in a position to provide an accurate and reliable response to your request. In general terms, regardless of the closure scenario, the lands and waters within the Lac de Gras area will be directly impacted and forever changed. The DKFN know that lands within the Lac de Gras area are essential for the life-giving purposes of all living and non-living things (which includes the DKFN) in that area. We believe that every reasonable effort must be used to make the least amount of disturbances of the natural environment of Lac de Gras during the life of the mine and Diavik must make every reasonable effort to reclaim Lac de Gras to its natural state. We believe good working relationships, the use of best scientific and technological practises, Traditional Knowledge, and clear recommendations, direction, monitoring and inspections are essential for meeting a reclamation goal of having self-sustaining ecosystems that are compatible with a healthy environment and with human activities. Detailed reclamation monitoring with specific goals, objectives and thresholds must be identified, plus contingencies need to be in place if monitoring shows a trajectory towards unacceptable levels and potential risks to the environment and humans. Information Request No. 2 Source: Mackenzie Valley Review Board Subject: Closure options Preamble: The current closure plan requires Diavik to reconnect the flooded pits and underground mine workings to Lac de Gras once water quality is deemed to be acceptable. Once reconnected, the pits can function as fish habitat. Under the current proposal, some of the pits that would be reconnected with Lac de Gras to serve as fish habitat would contain processed kimberlite. Questions: 1. When determining if the pits should be reconnected to Lac de Gras at closure, is water quality in the pit lake the only criteria that should be considered? 2. If not, please describe what additional criteria for re-connection should be considered. DKFN Response: As mentioned in the response to IR#1, water quality is not the only criteria that should be considered. Water is directly and indirectly essential to the exercise of the Aboriginal rights of DKFN and Indigenous knowledge, values and perspectives can be addressed in the monitoring, regulation, compliance verification, and performance of the closure plan to minimize impacts to Indigenous rights and interests. Maintaining the integrity of ecological systems and protecting biological resources must be based on an understanding of the functioning of natural systems. A holistic approach should be taken when determining criteria that should be considered when determining reclamation is successful. However, the concept of holism is from the Aboriginal definition is challenging to address in the context of an environmental assessment. Where an environmental assessment is typically based on an empirical approach, examining each 3 DKFN Response to MVRB IRs (EA1819-01) component of the local and regional area separately for effects of the proposed project, Indigenous groups evaluate the social, cultural, and environmental impacts of a project as a whole, from their unique set of environmental values and perceptions of risk. We believe that acknowledging and working to understand the role of risk perception of the project in the context of Indigenous groups’ holistic definition will help Diavik, regulators and Indigenous groups develop and improve mitigation and reclamation measures. DKFN members have the aspirations and knowledge to protect and steward their land for future generations – but require additional support to do so. In this regard, it is imperative that Indigenous knowledge and values are incorporated into the oversight of project to minimize impacts on Aboriginal rights, heritage and interests. Indigenous oversight of the mine closure will support environmentally responsible development, while promoting good governance in the protection of natural resources within the Lac de Gras area. Plus, the information and knowledge attained can ultimately be incorporated into the traditional laws and guiding management practices of the DKFN and other Indigenous groups. However, the fundamental success of any closure and reclamation will be the development and fostering of strong partnerships and collaboration with Diavik, regulators and Indigenous groups. 4 Deninu K'ue Ethno-history Report Dated December 12, 2012 Indian Encampment (awaiting payment of treaty money) at Fort Resolution, 1924 (Retrieved from http://www.pwnhc.ca/databases/archives/Item_Display.asp?Accession_Number=G-1979- 001&Item_Number=0151) Table of Contents Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Summary of Sources ........................................................................................................................ 8 Preface .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Place Names ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter I: Introduction ............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Grants and Contributions Results Report 2015 – 2016

    Grants and Contributions Results Report 2015 – 2016

    TABLED DOCUMENT 230-18(2) TABLED ON NOVEMBER 3, 2016 Grants and Contributions Results Report 2015 – 2016 November 2016 If you would like this information in another official language, call us. English Si vous voulez ces informations dans une autre langue officielle, contactez-nous. French Kīspin ki nitawihtīn ē nīhīyawihk ōma ācimōwin, tipwāsinān. Cree ch yat k . w n w , ts n . ch Ɂ ht s n n yat t a h ts k a y yat th at , n w ts n y t . Chipewyan n h h t hat k at h nah h n na ts ah . South Slavey K hsh t n k h ht y n w n . North Slavey ii wan ak i hii in k at at i hch hit yin hthan , iits t in hkh i. Gwich in Uvanittuaq ilitchurisukupku Inuvialuktun, ququaqluta. Inuvialuktun ᑖᒃᑯᐊ ᑎᑎᕐᒃᑲᐃᑦ ᐱᔪᒪᒍᕕᒋᑦ ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᓕᕐᒃᓯᒪᓗᑎᒃ, ᐅᕙᑦᑎᓐᓄᑦ ᐅᖄᓚᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᑎᑦ. Inuktitut Hapkua titiqqat pijumagupkit Inuinnaqtun, uvaptinnut hivajarlutit. Inuinnaqtun Aboriginal Languages Secretariat: 867-767-9346 ext. 71037 Francophone Affairs Secretariat: 867-767-9343 TABLE OF CONTENTS MINISTER’S MESSAGE ....................................................................................................................................................................................................1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................................................................................2 Preface .............................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Selected Bibliography on the Geology of Canadian Deposits and Occurrences of Uranium and Thorium

    Selected Bibliography on the Geology of Canadian Deposits and Occurrences of Uranium and Thorium

    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA COMMISSION GEOLOGIQUE DU CANADA PAPER 75-45 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE GEOLOGY OF CANADIAN DEPOSITS AND OCCURRENCES OF URANIUM AND THORIUM DENYSE M. GARNEAU Energy, Mines and Energie, Mines et Resources Canada Ressources Canada 1976 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PAPEP 75-45 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE GEOLOGY OF CANADIAN DEPOSITS AND OCCURRENCES OF URANIUM AND THORIUM DENYSE M. GARNEAU 1976 © Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1976 Printing and Publishing Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0S9, from the Geological Survey of Canada 601 Booth St., Ottawa, K1A 0E8 or through your bookseller. r, i . »T .... „,- ... Price: Canada: $2.00 Catalogue No. M44-75-45 Othe_„ r countries:$2. !„ . 4.0„ Price subject to change without notice FOREWORD The only previous bibliography on the occurrence of uranium in Canada was compiled by J. W. Griffith and published by the Geological Survey of Canada nearly 20 years ago, in 1956. Shortly afterward interest in prospecting for uranium faded, to be revived for a brief period 19G6 to 1970, when much literature on Canadian deposits and occurrencesjias published. It appears likely that uranium will play a significant role in meeting Canada's energy needs in the future. To assist those con- cerned with uranium exploration a revision of the previous bibliography has been prepared. Miss Garneau was assigned the task of compilation of the new bibliography, which was based upon a file index built up since 1967 by Eric Smith, T. J. Bottrill, Andre Boyer, and H.W. Little. Miss Garneau has checked these references and added many herself.
  • 2018 Yellowknife Geoscience Forum Abstract and Summary Volume

    2018 Yellowknife Geoscience Forum Abstract and Summary Volume

    2018 Abstract and Summary Volume Cover photograph Carcajou River, NWT; Viktor Terlaky, Senior Petroleum Geologist at the Northwest Territories Geological Survey The picture was taken following a rainstorm along Carcajou River, NWT, which resulted in a spectacular rainbow across the river valley. In the background are outcrops of the Late Devonian Imperial Formation, interpreted to be submarine turbidite deposits. The light bands are sandstone bodies intercalated with the darker shale intervals, representing periodic activity in sedimentation. Compiled by D. Irwin, S.D. Gervais, and V. Terlaky Recommended Citation: Irwin, D., Gervais, S.D., and Terlaky, V. (compilers), 2018. 46th Annual Yellowknife Geoscience Forum Abstracts; Northwest Territories Geological Survey, Yellowknife, NT. YKGSF Abstracts Volume 2018. - TECHNICAL PROGRAM - 2018 YELLOWKNIFE GEOSCIENCE FORUM ABSTRACTS AND SUMMARIES I Contents ordered by first author (presenting author in bold) Abstracts – Oral Presentations IBAS – to Regulate or Not: What is the Rest of Canada Doing? Abouchar, J. .......................................................................................................................... 1 Seabridge Discovers New Gold Zones at Courageous Lake Adam, M.A. ........................................................................................................................... 1 Gold Mineralisation at the Fat Deposit, Courageous Lake, Northwest Territories Adam, M.A. ..........................................................................................................................
  • A Review of Information on Fish Stocks and Harvests in the South Slave Area, Northwest Territories

    A Review of Information on Fish Stocks and Harvests in the South Slave Area, Northwest Territories

    A Review of Information on Fish Stocks and Harvests in the South Slave Area, Northwest Territories DFO L b ary / MPO Bibliotheque 1 1 11 0801752111 1 1111 1 1 D.B. Stewart' Central and Arctic Region Department of Fisheries and Oceans Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N6 'Arctic Biological Consultants Box 68, St. Norbert Postal Station 95 Turnbull Drive Winnipeg, MB, R3V 1L5. 1999 Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2493 Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Manuscript reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which deals with national or regional problems. Distribution is restricted to institutions or individuals located in particular regions of Canada. However, no restriction is placed on subject matter, and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Manuscript reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts and indexed in the Department's annual index to scientific and technical publications. Numbers 1-900 in this series were issued as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Biological Board of Canada, and subsequent to 1937 when the name of the Board was changed by Act of Parliament, as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 901-1425 were issued as Manuscript Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 1426-1550 were issued as Department of Fisheries and the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service Manuscript Reports.
  • Movements and Distribution of the Bathurst and Ahiak Barren-Ground

    Movements and Distribution of the Bathurst and Ahiak Barren-Ground

    Movements and distribution of the Bathurst and Ahiak barren-ground caribou herds 2005 Annual Report Submitted to West Kitikmeot Slave Study Society Submitted By Project Leader Anne Gunn Project Team Adrian D’Hont, Judy Williams Organisation Wildlife Division, Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife. 2 Summary: Objectives for 2005 included deploying 10 collars on cows from the Bathurst caribou herd and 10 collars on cows from the Ahiak caribou herd. A reconnaissance survey over the winter range of the Bathurst herd found heavy concentrations of caribou at Lac Grandin southeast to Rae Lakes and then low densities of caribou until east of Yellowknife. Of the 10 collars put on the Bathurst range, three died between April and June and the remaining seven calved on the Bathurst calving ground. Flights over the Ahiak winter range resulted in no caribou seen east of Contwoyto, low concentrations on the Back River and high concentrations east of Artillery Lake and in the Nonacho Lake area. Five collars were deployed east of Artillery Lake and five in the Nonacho Lake area. Of the five collars deployed in the Nonacho Lake area, two caribou migrated to the Bathurst calving ground. The remaining eight collars calved on the Ahiak calving ground. In 2005, in addition to addressing the objectives of the movement and distribution study for individual herds we successfully collared 12 cows from the Bathurst herd and 8 from the Ahiak herd. We also documented overlap in the winter distribution of Ahiak and Bathurst caribou at Nonacho Lake. Acknowledgements: West Kitikmeot Slave Study Society funded the study and we thank the Board for their continued support.
  • SLAVE MÉTIS ALLIANCE PO Box 2301 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2P7

    SLAVE MÉTIS ALLIANCE PO Box 2301 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2P7

    SLAVE MÉTIS ALLIANCE PO Box 2301 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2P7 July 4, 2019 Mackenzie Valley Review Board 200 Scotia Centre, 5102-50th Ave Yellowknife, NT X1A 2N7 To: Kate Mansfield & Catherine Fairbairn Re: Review Board Information Requests to Parties for Diavik EA1819-01 As requested for the Diavik Environmental Assessment (EA1819-01), the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board (Review Board) issued two information request to several parties, including the North Slave Métis Alliance. This letter specifically addresses Information Request 1: Potential impacts to cultural use of Lac de Gras Area 1. Please describe how your group used the Lac de Gras area culturally (including the hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and travel) before mining started there. As this question pertains to the land use prior to the development of Diavik Diamond Mine, this information was collected and provided to the regulators during the initial environmental assessment of the mine. Please see the attached “Appendix A: Can’t Live Without Work” by North Slave Metis Alliance (1999). 2. Please describe how your group would use and feel about the Lac de Gras area under the following scenarios: a) reconnecting empty pits and underground mine workings with Lac de Gras at closure (that is, Diavik’s current closure plan for the mine), b) putting processed kimberlite into the pits and underground mine workings before reconnecting them to Lac de Gras (that is, the proposed activities for this environmental assessment), c) putting processed kimberlite into the pits and underground mine workings and not reconnecting them with Lac de Gras. During a community meeting, NSMA members expressed that their interest was to have the Diavik mine site (not just the pits) return to pre-development condition as much as practicable, in such a way that the area would be the cleanest and safest environment possible for humans and wildlife.
  • Government Service Officers Contact Information

    Government Service Officers Contact Information

    Government Service Officers Contact Information Community Government Service Officer Mailing address Contact information Aklavik Shandel McLeod Aklavik Office Complex [email protected] GNWT Single Window Service Centre Phone: (867) 978-2285 P.O. Box 210 Fax: (867) 978-2061 AKLAVIK, NT X0E 0A0 Rabecca Rabesca Ko' GoCho Centre [email protected] GNWT Single Window Service Centre Phone: (867) 392-6046 Behchokǫ̀ P.O. Box 9 Fax: (867) 392-2682 NT X0E 0Y0 Colville Lake Ann Kochon-Orlias CommunityBEHCHOKǪ, Band Complex [email protected] GNWT Single Window Service Centre Phone: (867) 709-2047 P.O. Box 6 Fax: (867) 709-2042 COLVILLE LAKE, NT X0E 1L0 Irene Kodakin Victor Beyonnie Bldg. [email protected] GNWT Single Window Service Centre Phone: (867) 589-4910 Dé lı̨nę P.O. Box 216 Fax: (867) 589-3689 DÉL X0E 0G0 Fort Good Hope Celine Proctor K’ashoĮNĘ, Gotine NT Bldg. (Yamoga Office) [email protected] GNWT Single Window Service Centre Phone: (867) 598-2179 P.O. Box 129 Fax: (867) 598-2437 FORT GOOD HOPE, NT X0E 0H0 Page 1 of 4 Community Government Service Officer Mailing address Contact information Fort Liard Julie Capot-Blanc Hamlet Office Bldg. [email protected] GNWT Single Window Service Centre Phone: (867) 770-2277 P.O. Box 171 Fax: (867) 770-4004 FORT LIARD, NT X0E 0L0 Fort McPherson Mary Rose Tetlichi John A. Tetlichi Bldg. [email protected] GNWT Single Window Service Centre Phone: (867) 952-2060 P.O. Box 314 Fax: (867) 952-2512 FORT McPHERSON, NT X0E 0J0 Fort Providence Alayna Krutko Snowshoe Centre [email protected] GNWT Single Window Service Centre Phone: (867) 699-3149 P.O.
  • Growing Forward Canada/Northwest Territories Growing Forward Agreement Small Scale Foods Program Community Garden Initiative 2010 Annual Report

    Growing Forward Canada/Northwest Territories Growing Forward Agreement Small Scale Foods Program Community Garden Initiative 2010 Annual Report

    Growing Forward Canada/Northwest Territories Growing Forward Agreement Small Scale Foods Program Community Garden Initiative 2010 Annual Report Revised May 2011 Industry, Tourism and Investment Table of Contents Introduction...........................................................................3 Background............................................................................4 Historical perspective .........................................................................................4 Program need .....................................................................................................4 Partners and stakeholders ..................................................................................4 Project to date ....................................................................................................5 Regional.Involvement............................................................6 Future.directions.for.Small.Scale.Foods.Program..................9 2 Introduction In 2006, the Department of Industry, Tourism and Investment The primary mandate of the SSFP is to create an environment (ITI) introduced a local, community-based food production within communities which encourages residents to work program in a limited number of communities through together, and to gain and share knowledge in growing food the Northwest Territories (NWT). Resources were largely for community consumption. The program not only provides provided from the Canada/NWT Agriculture Policy Framework for seed, and small tools, but also assists
  • Mercury in Fish from Rivers and Lakes in Southwestern Northwest Territories F}-3?;317 (J F}Cu

    Mercury in Fish from Rivers and Lakes in Southwestern Northwest Territories F}-3?;317 (J F}Cu

    Mercury in Fish from Rivers and Lakes in Southwestern Northwest Territories f}-3?;317 (J f}Cu.. v Northern Water Resources Studies Mercury in Fish from Rivers and Lakes in Southwestern Northwest Territories July 1995 Northern Affairs Program B.J. Grey!", S.M. Harbichr'! and G.R. Stephens' 1 Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Yellowknife 2 Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Yellowknife "Now at the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Ottawa t Now at the Department of the Environment, Yellowknife Published under the authority of the Honourable Ronald A. Irwin, P.c., M.P., Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Ottawa, 1995 QS-8507-000-EF-A1 Catalogue No. R71-48/4-1995E ISBN 0-662-23220-8 © Minister of Public Works.and Government Services Canada EXECUTIVE SUl\IMARY This report presents and interprets data on mercury contamination in fish from the Slave and Hay Rivers in southwestern Northwest Territories. Fish were also sampled from a study control site, Leland Lake, in the Slave River basin. The original purpose of this study was to assess water quality in the Slave River including mercury levels. Since it is difficult to accurately measure mercury in the water column, fish were selected as the measurement medium. Mercury data from fish tissues were provided to Health Canada (formerly Health andWelfare Canada) for health evaluations related to dietary consumption. Walleye, pike and lake whitefish were sampled over three years (1988 to 1990). These three species were selected because of their importance to local residents for subsistence fishing. Total mercury concentrations were determined in the samples, with methylmercury concentrations determined in a random subset.
  • Annexes Supplémentaires Et Photos

    Annexes Supplémentaires Et Photos

    ANNEXES SUPPLÉMENTAIRES ETannexe PHOTOS 2 Tableaux : L’immigration arabe au Canada L’immigration arabe au Canada TABLEAU A Chiffres du recensement : les Arabes au Canada, par origine ethnique Années Arabes 1911 7 000 1921 8 282 1931 10 753 1941 11 857 1951 12 3011 1961 19 374 1971 26 665 1981 60 6852 1986 72 3153 1. La catégorie « syrien » de 1951 disparaît du recensement pour être remplacée par « syriens-libanais » en 1961 et 1971. Le recensé ne peut déclarer qu’une seule origine ethnique, correspondant aux antécédents paternels, est-il précisé. 2. En 1981, le recensé peut désormais indiquer plusieurs origines ethniques, mais ces résultats n’ont pas tous été publiés. Nous avons additionné les chiffres pour les origines : Arabes asiatiques 50 140 (Libanais : 27 320, Syrien : 3 455, Palestinien : 1005 et autres), Arabes nord-africains 10 545 (dont 9 140 Égyptiens). 3. Le tableau pour le recensement de 1986 propose une catégorie « origines arabes » dans laquelle il y a plusieurs sous catégories : Libanais (29 345), Syrien (3 045), Palestinien (1 070), Égyptien (11 580) et autres Arabes (27 275). 274 Se dire arabe au Canada Tableaux : L’immigration arabe au Canada 275 TABLEAU B Admissions en provenance du monde arabe au Canada TABLEAU C Statistiques Canada : origine ethnique des immigrants, par année 1946-1955 Années Syriens4 Année Syriens Arabes Libanais Égyptiens Total 1880-1890 50 1946 11 11 1890-1900 1 500 1947 25 1 26 1900-1910 5 500 1948 31 5 36 1910-1920 920 1949 72 25 97 1920-1930 1 100 1950 54 29 83 1930-1940 933 1951 229 52 281 1940-1950 192 1952 242 73 315 Années Total, pays arabes5 1953 227 18 245 1950-1960 5 000 1954 253 15 268 1960-1970 22 945 1955 118 56 208 17 399 1970-1980 30 635 Total 1 262 274 208 17 1 761 1980-1990 59 155 1990-2000 141 005 Source: Immigration statistics, Department Immigration and Citizenship, Canada.
  • Brian George, P.Eng., FEC Mechanical

    Brian George, P.Eng., FEC Mechanical

    CIMFP Exhibit P-02332 Page 1 Brian George, P.Eng., FEC Mechanical Brian has over 40 years of specialized experience in mechanical engineering with over 25 years of working in Northern Canada. He has designed mechanical systems for apartments, hospitals, labs, offices, schools, warehouses, office buildings and apartments throughout Yukon, Nunavut and the Northwest Territories. Brian’s experience includes high and low pressure steam systems; central plants; piping stress analysis; direct bury and utilidor type distribution systems; plumbing systems; medical gas systems; fire protection systems; heating systems using radiant ceiling panel, perimeter radiation and slab heating system; site storm, sanitary and water services; water treatment and waste treatment facilities; ventilation and cooling systems of all types; dust collection and exhaust systems; EDUCATION fully computerized DDC controls, pneumatic and electric controls. He has worked Bachelor of Science Mechanical Engineering with Distinction, 1974 on a number of refrigeration systems from liquid ammonia beer cooling systems in University of Saskatchewan a brewery to brine/ammonia systems for hockey and curling arenas. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Except for Yellowknife, Hay River, Inuvik and Norman Wells almost all projects in AFFILIATIONS the North include some work on a fuel system for the buildilng. Brian has worked NAPEG, Former President, Life on fuel systems across the Arctic from small single tank systems feeding housing Member through to tank farms and dispensing systems serving communiteis and mine ASHRAE Life Member APEGS Life Member sites. APEY ACEC-NWT, Former President RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE PROGESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP AIRPORT FACILITIES NAPEG P.Eng. 1407 CERTIFICATIONS Combined Services Building; Yellowknife, NT Fundamentals of Infection Control Senior Mechanical Engineer for this design & field services project for the vehicle during Construction, Renovation or maintenance building at the YK Airport.
  • Historical Profile of the Great Slave Lake Area's Mixed European-Indian Ancestry Community

    Historical Profile of the Great Slave Lake Area's Mixed European-Indian Ancestry Community

    Historical Profile of the Great Slave Lake Area’s Mixed European-Indian Ancestry Community by Gwynneth Jones Research and & Aboriginal Law and Statistics Division Strategic Policy Group The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Justice Canada. i Table of Contents Abstract ii Author’s Biography iii I. Executive Summary iv II. Methodology/Introduction vi III. Narrative A. First Contact at Great Slave Lake, 1715 - 1800 1 B. Mixed-Ancestry Families in the Great Slave Lake Region to 1800 12 C. Fur Trade Post Life at 1800 19 D. Development of the Fur Trade and the First Mixed-Ancestry Generation, 1800 - 1820 25 E. Merger of the Fur Trade Companies and Changes in the Great Slave Lake Population, 1820 - 1830 37 F. Fur Trade Monopoly and the Arrival of the Missionaries, 1830 - 1890 62 G. Treaty, Traders and Gold, 1890 - 1900 88 H. Increased Presence and Regulations by Persons not of Indian/ Inuit/Mixed-Ancestry Descent, 1905 - 1950 102 IV. Discussion/Summary 119 V. Suggestions for Future Research 129 VI. References VII. Appendices Appendix A: Extracts of Selected Entries in Oblate Birth, Marriage and Death Registers Appendix B: Métis Scrip -- ArchiviaNet (Summaries of Genealogical Information on Métis Scrip Applications) VIII. Key Documents and Document Index (bound separately) Abstract With the Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. Powley [2003] 2 S.C.R., Métis were recognized as having an Aboriginal right to hunt for food as recognized under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.