Rochford District Replacement Local Plan 2006

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rochford District Replacement Local Plan 2006 Rochford District Replacement Local Plan th Adopted 16 June 2006 Rochford District Council Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Cantonese Gujarati Spanish 如果你 需要 放大,盲 Si desea esta información impresa en letra grande, 文資訊或者不同語言的 Braille o en otro idioma, 版本請聯絡 01702 546 366 por favor llame al teléfono 01702 546 366 Urdu Portugese Caso necessite desta informação em impressão maior, em Braille ou noutra língua, por favor contacte 01702 546 366 Shona Kana uchida ruzivo, kana tsananguro iyi yakanyorwa nemavara makuru, kana kuthi yakanyorwa nerurimi rwemapofu, kana nerumwe rurimi, kana umwe mufauro sununguka kuti taurira parunare ronoti 01702 546 366 If you would like this information in large print, Braille or another language please contact 01702 546 366 Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Preface i ROCHFORD DISTRICT COUNCIL Head of Planning & Transportation SHAUN SCRUTTON BSc (Hons), Dip TP, MRTPI, IHBC, MBA, MCMI STATUS This document has been prepared in accordance with the Town and Country Planning Act (1990) and the various relevant subsequent statutory instruments. It was adopted by Rochford District Council on 27th April 2006 & came into effect on 19th May 2006. It now forms part of the development plan for the Rochford district. CREDITS This document has been prepared by the Planning Policy team at Rochford District Council. The work has been undertaken by: Andrew Meddle – Team Leader (Planning Policy) Monica Palmer – Senior Planning Officer Ian Borthwick – GIS Officer Judith Adams – Planning Assistant James Firth – Planning Assistant Sam Hollingworth – Planning Assistant Kay Tinson – Administrative Assistant CONTACTS If you have any queries regarding this document or other aspects of planning policy, please contact the Planning Policy team. Planning Policy Team 01702 318002 Rochford District Council Council Offices South Street Rochford Essex SS4 1BW [email protected] Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Foreword ii FOREWORD CLLR MICHAEL STARKE CHAIRMAN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMMITTEE I am very pleased to be able to write the foreword to the Replacement Local Plan which has now been adopted by the Council following more than three years of preparation, which included extensive public consultation, and much hard work by both Members and Officers alike. The Rochford District Replacement Local Plan will be valid for three years and it provides a good basis for working on the new Local Development Framework. It expands the range of policy issues to cover new aspects of the constantly evolving development scene, including environmental and social issues that are at the forefront of our concerns today. The main challenge facing the District is to balance the protection of the Green Belt against the identified need to provide new land for housing and for industrial development. People need houses to live in and industry is responsible for generating much of the wealth on which our prosperity is based; neither issue can be avoided. I believe, this Local Plan succeeds in presenting a proper balance between the different competing needs of the District, but in particular, through the application of Green Belt policies, will ensure the protection of the countryside in the District. MICHAEL STARKE CHAIRMAN – ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Contents RDRLP Rochford District Council Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Contents iii CHAPTER / CHAPTER / POLICY TITLE PAGES POLICY PREFACE i FOREWORD ii CONTENTS iii– vii 1 INTRODUCTION & CORE STATEGIES 1 - 18 CS1 Moving towards sustainable development 7 CS2 Protecting and enhancing the built and natural 8 environment CS3 Reducing the need to travel 9 CS4 Accessible and high quality housing and services 11 CS5 Encouraging economic regeneration 12 CS6 Promoting good design and design statements 13 CS7 Conserving and enhancing heritage 14 CS8 Retaining character of place 15 CS9 Emphasising the value of landscaping 17 CS10 Energy & water consumption 17 2 HOUSING 19 – 43 HP1 Overall housing provision 23 HP2 Housing site allocation 24 HP3 Density of development 25 HP4 Design statements 25 HP5 Infrastructure 26 HP6 Design and layout 28 HP7 Energy & water conservation 28 HP8 Affordable housing 31 HP9 Rural exceptions 31 HP10 Crime prevention 32 HP11 Flatted accommodation 33 HP12 Sheltered housing 34 HP13 Mobility housing 35 HP14 Backland development 35 HP15 Loss of dwellings 36 HP16 Sub-division of dwellings 36 Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Contents iv CHAPTER / CHAPTER / POLICY TITLE PAGES POLICY 2 HOUSING (cont.) 19 – 43 HP17 Living over the shop 37 HP18 Enclosure of grass verges 39 HP19 Caravan parks 40 HP20 Gypsy sites 42 HP21 Planning Obligations 42 3 RURAL ISSUES 44 – 63 R1 Development within the Green Belt 46 R2 Rural Settlement Areas within the Green Belt 47 R3 Agricultural and forestry dwellings 50 R4 Temporary agricultural dwellings 51 R5 The extension of dwellings in the Green Belt 53 R6 The replacement or rebuild of existing dwellings in the 54 – 55 Green Belt R7 The extension of domestic gardens 56 R8 New agricultural buildings 58 R9 The re-use and adaptation of existing rural buildings & 59 – 60 farm diversification R10 New retail uses 61 R11 Hall Road cemetery 61 R12 New cemeteries 62 4 EMPLOYMENT 64 – 78 EB1 Existing sites & the allocation of new sites 71 EB2 Making the best use of available land 71 EB3 Non-conforming uses 72 EB4 Working from home 73 EB5 Design statements 75 EB6 Landscaping 75 EB7 Baltic Wharf 76 EB8 Essex Marina 77 Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Contents v CHAPTER / CHAPTER / POLICY TITLE PAGES POLICY 5 TRANSPORT 79 – 96 TP1 Sustainable transport 86 TP2 Traffic management 87 TP3 Traffic calming 87 TP4 Heavy lorry routes 88 TP5 Public transport 89 TP6 Safeguarding & the promotion of walking, cycling & 91 horseriding routes Walking and cycling TP7 Public car parks 92 TP8 Car parking standards 92 – 94 TP9 London Southend Airport 95 TP10 Aviation and noise 95 TP11 Area of Special Restraint 96 6 LEISURE & TOURISM 97 – 119 LT1 Rural issues 99 LT2 Public playing pitch provision 103 LT3 Cherry Orchard Jubilee Country Park 104 LT4 Public open space 105 LT5 New public open space 105 LT6 Private open space 106 LT7 Safeguarding open space 106 LT8 Indoor sports and leisure facilities 107 LT9 Children's play spaces 108 LT10 New play space provision 108 LT11 Leisure uses in shopping areas 109 LT12 Leisure development affecting shopping areas 109 LT13 Golf courses 110 LT14 Horse riding facilities 111 LT15 Water recreation facilities 112 LT16 Dry pits 113 LT17 Tourism 114 LT18 Rural tourism 115 LT19 New hotel accommodation 116 LT20 Touring caravans and tents 117 LT21 Sports causing noise or disturbance 118 LT22 Floodlighting 119 Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Contents vi CHAPTER / CHAPTER / POLICY TITLE PAGES POLICY 7 BUILDING CONSERVATION & ARCHAEOLOGY 120 – 127 BC1 Conservation Areas: General 122 BC2 Demolition within Conservation Areas 123 BC3 Alterations to Listed Buildings 124 BC4 Demolition of Listed Buildings 125 BC5 Development affecting archaeological sites 126 BC6 Development affecting regional, county and local 127 archaeological sites 8 NATURAL RESOURCES 128 – 147 NR1 Special Landscape Areas 130 NR2 Historic landscape 131 NR3 Tree protection 132 NR4 Biodiversity on development sites 134 NR5 European and International sites 137 NR6 Sites of Special Scientific Interest 138 NR7 Local Nature Reserves and wildlife sites 139 NR8 Other landscape features of importance for nature 140 conservation NR9 Species protection 141 NR10 Coastal Protection Belt 142 NR11 Development within flood risk areas 144 NR12 Sustainable drainage systems 145 NR13 Creation of intertidal habitats 147 9 SHOPPING, ADVERTISEMENTS & TOWN CENTRES 148 – 160 SAT1 New retail, commercial and leisure development 151 SAT2 District & local shopping centres & shops 151 SAT3 Rochford foodstore 152 SAT4 Non-retail uses within Primary Shopping Frontages 154 SAT5 Non-retail uses within Secondary Shopping Frontages 155 SAT6 Neighbourhood and village shops 156 SAT7 Servicing 157 Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Contents vii CHAPTER / CHAPTER / POLICY TITLE PAGES POLICY 9 SHOPPING, ADVERTISEMENTS & … (cont.) 148 – 160 SAT8 Shop Fronts: Design and security 158 SAT9 Advertisements: General district-wide policy 159 SAT10 Advertisements within Conservation Areas 159 SAT11 Advertisements: Visual clutter 159 10 UTILITIES, HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES 161 – 173 UT1 Foul and surface water requirements 164 UT2 Non-mains disposal of foul water and sewage 165 UT3 Renewable energy 167 UT4 Telecommunications development 169 UT5 Healthcare provision 171 11 POLLUTION 174 – 182 PN1 Potentially polluting uses 175 PN2 Contaminated land 176 PN3 Protection of water quality 177 PN4 Air quality 178 PN5 Noise generating development 180 PN6 Noise sensitive development 180 PN7 Light pollution 181 12 MONITORING 183 – 187 GLOSSARY viii - xxii PROPOSALS MAPS MAP MAP COVERAGE A The western part of Rochford District (including an inset covering Foulness) B The eastern part of Rochford District (including insets covering Hockley, Rayleigh & Rochford town centres) Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Chapter 1 Introduction & Objectives RDRLP Rochford District Council Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Rochford District Replacement Local Plan Chapter 1 Introduction
Recommended publications
  • Open Space Study 2009
    Rochford District Council January 2010 Open Space Study 2009 LDF Contents Chapter Page Number 1. Introduction 1 2. Natural and Semi-Natural Greenspaces 27 3. Amenity Greenspaces 40 4. Country Park 50 5. Allotments 55 6. Provision for Children and Young People 64 7. Outdoor Sports Facilities 87 8. Cemeteries and Churchyards 112 9. Streets, Squares and Pedestrian Areas 114 10. Recommendations 117 Appendix A – Current Provision 119 Appendix B – Recommended Quantity Standards 140 Benchmarked Against Other Local Authorities Appendix C – Recommended Accessibility Standards 141 Benchmarked Against Other Local Authorities Appendix D – Open Space Survey Questionnaire 142 Appendix E – Quality Criteria 145 Appendix F – Quality Comments 153 Introduction Introduction Purpose of an Open Space Study This study provides a thorough assessment of the current provision of open space across the District through analysing the existing supply, quality and accessibility of each type of open space. It is important to identify local need and ensure that there is adequate open space provision which would benefit the health and well being of local communities, as well as encouraging a sense of pride and social inclusion and promoting community empowerment within the District. Open spaces provide significant opportunities for informal recreation enabling residents and visitors to undertake activities such as walking and cycling and outdoor sport and leisure activities such as football and cricket, with many open spaces providing a multi-functional purpose. This study will seek to recommend appropriate provision and accessibility standards and potential improvements to quality for the different types of open space audited. Ensuring high quality, accessible open spaces to local communities is particularly important given the increasing pressure on land for other uses.
    [Show full text]
  • South Essex Outline Water Cycle Study Technical Report
    South Essex Outline Water Cycle Study Technical Report Final September 2011 Prepared for South Essex: Outline Water Cycle Study Revision Schedule South Essex Water Cycle Study September 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 April 2011 D132233: S. Clare Postlethwaite Carl Pelling Carl Pelling Essex Outline Senior Consultant Principal Consultant Principal Consultant WCS – First Draft_v1 02 August 2011 Final Draft Clare Postlethwaite Rob Sweet Carl Pelling Senior Consultant Senior Consultant Principal Consultant 03 September Final Clare Postlethwaite Rob Sweet Jon Robinson 2011 Senior Consultant Senior Consultant Technical Director URS/Scott Wilson Scott House Alençon Link Basingstoke RG21 7PP Tel 01256 310200 Fax 01256 310201 www.urs-scottwilson.com South Essex Water Cycle Study Limitations URS Scott Wilson Ltd (“URS Scott Wilson”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Basildon Borough Council, Castle Point Borough Council and Rochford District Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS Scott Wilson. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client or relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS Scott Wilson. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS Scott Wilson has not been independently verified by URS Scott Wilson, unless otherwise stated in the Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Allocations Plan
    Rochford District Council Adopted 25 February 2014 Local Development Framework Allocations Plan LDF www.rochford.gov.uk If you would like this information in large print, Braille or another language, please contact 01702 318111. Rochford District Council – Local Development Framework Allocations Document Contents Page 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 5 The Role of the Allocations Document........................................................... 5 Relationship with other LDF Documents ....................................................... 6 Vision .................................................................................................................. 8 Sustainability Appraisal ................................................................................... 9 Community Involvement ................................................................................... 9 Relationship with Other Strategies ................................................................. 9 Evidence Base ................................................................................................. 10 National Planning Policy Framework............................................................ 14 Key Diagram..................................................................................................... 15 2. Brownfield Residential Land Allocations ...................................................... 17 Introduction ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Wildlife Site Review 2007
    Rochford District Council November 2007 Rochford District Local Wildlife Sites Review 2007 LDF IMPORTANT NOTES Nomenclature The term "Site of Importance for Nature Conservation" (SINC) used in previous reports is here replaced by the currently generally accepted term of “Local Wildlife Site”. Rationale It is hoped that this identification of important Local Wildlife Sites is not seen as a hindrance to the livelihood of those landowners affected, or an attempt to blindly influence the management of such sites. It is an attempt to describe the wildlife resource we have in the county as a whole, which has been preserved thus far as a result of the management by landowners and together we hope to be able to help landowners retain and enhance this biodiversity for the future. Public Access Identification as a Local Wildlife Site within this report does not confer any right of public access to the site, above and beyond any Public Rights of Way that may exist. The vast majority of the Sites are in private ownership and this should be respected at all times. Land Ownership It has always been the intention of the Essex Wildlife Trust to contact all landowners of Local Wildlife Sites, advising them of this identification and promoting nature conservation management of the site. To that end, the Essex Wildlife Trust has appointed a Local Wildlife Sites Officer. While this lengthy undertaking is in progress it is requested that the Essex Wildlife Trust is contacted prior to any formal approach regarding any Site identified within this report. Boundaries Whilst every attempt has been made to ensure accurate mapping of the site boundaries, the accompanying maps should be considered as being illustrative only.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Basis
    ROCHFORD DISTRICT CORE STRATEGY REGULATION 26 DRAFT SECTION FOUR 11 4 CORE STRATEGY ISSUES INTRODUCTION 4.1 The Council considers that the following are the key Core Strategy issues. Whilst text relating to the issues is included, no policies are. If, following consultation, it is believed that the Council has identified the issues correctly, then detailed policies will be developed. The areas of policy are, in no particular order, detailed below: • The green belt & strategic buffers between settlements • Protection and enhancement of the upper Roach Valley • Protection and enhancement of special landscapes, habitats and species • Housing numbers & phasing • General development locations • Affordable housing • Employment • Good design & design statements • Character of place & the historic environment • Landscaping • Energy & water conservation and renewable energy • Compulsory purchase & planning obligations • Community, leisure & tourism facilities 4.2 THE GREEN BELT & STRATEGIC BUFFERS BETWEEN SETTLEMENTS 4.2.1 The Council considers that its policies hitherto have helped achieve the five green belt purposes, as laid out in Planning Policy Guidance Note 2 – Green Belts (PPG2). The application of these has the combined effect of protecting the historic fabric of the district, preventing the further encroachment of development into the countryside and of safeguarding the countryside to provide for recreational needs and the protection of the natural features, flora, fauna and their habitats. 4.2.2 The Council also recognises that by diverting development and population growth away from rural areas to existing urban areas, green belt policy also assists in the achievement of sustainability objectives. This is recognised in the East of England Plan, particularly in policy SS1 and its supporting text.
    [Show full text]
  • Rochford District Council's Response To
    Rochford District Council – Castle Point New Local Plan 2016: Rochford District Council Response to Inspector’s Duty to Co-operate Questions Castle Point New Local Plan 2016: Rochford District Council Response to Inspector’s Duty to Co-operate Questions 1. What is the latest position regarding your existing strategic development plan and the preparation of any post National Planning Policy Framework replacement local plan? 1.1 The Council has an adopted local development plan which consists of seven development plan documents, including a Core Strategy (2011), Allocations Plan (2014), Development Management Plan (2014) and four Area Action Plans covering three town centres and one covering London Southend Airport and its environs. These development plan documents were prepared and adopted by the Council between 2006 and 2015. The adopted local development plan covers the period to 2025. 1.2 An early review of the adopted local development plan has commenced. A number of technical evidence base documents have been prepared, including an Employment Land Study (2014), Environmental Capacity Study (2016), South Essex Strategic Housing Market Assessment (2016) and Retail and Leisure Study (2014). A Call for Sites has been undertaken between June 2015 and March 2016, which will inform the Council’s latest land availability assessment. Other more strategic technical evidence base documents are also underway including a South Essex Retail Study, South Essex Economic Development Needs Assessment and Essex-wide Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment (excluding Basildon Borough). These documents are expected to be completed in late 2016/early 2017. An update of the 2016 SHMA is also being prepared to take account of more recently published demographic projections.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Monitoring Report 2005
    ROCHFORD DISTRICT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Rochford District Council ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT FOR 2005/ 2006 December 2006 SHAUN SCRUTTON, BSc (Hons), DipTP, MRTPI, IHBC, MBA, MCMI Head of Planning & Transportation – Rochford District Council INVESTOR IN PEOPLE CONTENTS SECTION CONTENTS PAGES 1 INTRODUCTION 1 • Purpose and content of AMR 2 DISTRICT CHARACTERISTICS 2 – 8 • Demographic and physical characteristics of the district • Land allocations in the district 3 LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 9 – 10 PROGRESS • Progress of Replacement Local Plan • Progress of the Local Development Framework 4 HOUSING 11 – 33 • Structure Plan housing allocation for the district • Sites with planning permission • Sites without planning permission • Net and gross dwelling completions 2005-06 • Net dwelling completions during plan • period (1996-2005) • Outstanding dwellings • Completions by settlement • Windfall sites • Development on greenfield and previously • developed land • Affordable housing • Dwelling types • Small sites and large sites • Density • Housing trajectory 5 RURAL DEVELOPMENT 34 – 45 • Diversification from agriculture • Appropriate development in the Green Belt 6 INDUSTRIAL LAND 46 – 55 • Structure Plan industrial land allocation for the district • Industrial land supply • Land allocations without planning permission • Land allocations with planning permission • Outstanding industrial permission outside of industrial estates • Potential loss of industrial development on land allocated for industrial purposes i SECTION CONTENTS PAGES 7 LOCAL
    [Show full text]
  • Rochford District Council Environmental Capacity Study
    COUNCIL - 20 October 2015 Appendix B ROCHFORD DISTRICT COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL CAPACITY STUDY October 2015 8.7.1 COUNCIL - 20 October 2015 Appendix B Rochford District Council Environmental Capacity Study date: April 2015 Final Report October 2015 Final Report revised to take account of representations prepared for: Rochford District Council prepared by: Cheryl Beattie Enfusion Barbara Carroll Enfusion Alastair Peattie Enfusion Ilya Sparkes-Santos NPA GIS quality Barbara Carroll Enfusion assurance: Treenwood House Rowden Lane Bradford on Avon BA15 2AU t: 01225 867112 www.enfusion.co.uk 8.7.2 COUNCIL - 20 October 2015 Appendix B Rochford District Council Environmental Capacity Study CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction & Purpose 1 Introduction and Purpose Policy Context Environmental Capacity & Ecosystem Services Environmental Capacity and Spatial Planning Aims and Objectives Structure of Report 2 Approach & Methods 7 Approach Information Methods Consultation 3 Air (Quality & Climate Change) 13 Introduction Policy Context Current Situation Key Issues Arising from Baseline Information Effects of Development Sensitivity, Significance and Capacity 4 Land, Soils & Minerals 19 Introduction Policy Context Current Situation: International, National, Local, Green Open Space Key Issues Arising from Baseline Information Effects of Development Sensitivity, Significance and Capacity 5 Water (Resources, Quality & Flood Risk) 27 Introduction Policy Context Current Situation: River Basin Management; Estuarine & Coastal Waters; Water Resources; Wastewater; Flood
    [Show full text]
  • JAAP Evidence Report (2008)
    Rochford District Council Southend-on-Sea Borough Council London Southend Airport & Environs Study JAAP Evidence Report June 2008 Rochford District Council London Southend Airport & Environs Study JAAP Evidence Report Rochford Borough Council Southend-on-Sea Borough Council June 2008 Halcrow Group Limited Halcrow Group Limited Endeavour House Forder Way Cygnet Park Hampton Peterborough Cambridgeshire PE7 8GX England Tel +44 (0) 1733 560033 Fax +44 (0)1733 427988 www.halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their client, Southend-on-Sea Borough Council, Rochford District Council, Renaissance Southend, EEDA, Essex County Council, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2008 Halcrow Group Limited Endeavour House Forder Way Cygnet Park Hampton Peterborough Cambridgeshire PE7 8GX England Tel +44 (0) 1733 560033 Fax +44 (0)1733 427988 www.halcrow.com London Southend Airport & Environs Study JAAP Evidence Report Rochford Borough Council Southend-on-Sea Borough Council Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Revision Description Date Approved by 1 1 Draft Report 04 2008 Steve Scott 1 2 Final Report 06 2008 Steve Scott Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Study Brief 1 1.2 The Study Area 1 1.3 Structure of Report 5 PART 1: STUDY AREA AND CONTEXT 6 2 Policy Context 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 National Context 7 2.3 Regional/Sub-regional Context 9 2.4 Local
    [Show full text]