DOCSLIB.ORG

Multi-Layered Network Embedding

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Multi-Layered Network Embedding Multi-Layered Network Embedding Jundong Li∗y Chen Chen∗y Hanghang Tong∗ Huan Liu∗ Abstract tasks. To mitigate this problem, recent studies show Network embedding has gained more attentions in re- that through learning general network embedding rep- cent years. It has been shown that the learned low- resentations, many subsequent learning tasks could be dimensional node vector representations could advance greatly enhanced [17, 34, 39]. The basic idea is to learn a a myriad of graph mining tasks such as node classifi- low-dimensional node vector representation by leverag- cation, community detection, and link prediction. A ing the node proximity manifested in the network topo- vast majority of the existing efforts are overwhelmingly logical structure. devoted to single-layered networks or homogeneous net- The vast majority of existing efforts predomi- works with a single type of nodes and node interactions. nately focus on single-layered or homogeneous net- 1 However, in many real-world applications, a variety of works . However, real-world networks are much more networks could be abstracted and presented in a multi- complicated as cross-domain interactions between dif- layered fashion. Typical multi-layered networks include ferent networks are widely observed, which naturally critical infrastructure systems, collaboration platforms, form a type of multi-layered networks [12, 16, 35]. Crit- social recommender systems, to name a few. Despite the ical infrastructure systems are a typical example of widespread use of multi-layered networks, it remains a multi-layered networks (left part of Figure 1). In this daunting task to learn vector representations of different system, the power stations in the power grid are used types of nodes due to the bewildering combination of to provide electricity to routers in the autonomous sys- both within-layer connections and cross-layer network tem network (AS network) and vehicles in the trans- dependencies. In this paper, we study a novel prob- portation network; while the AS network, in turn, needs lem of multi-layered network embedding. In particular, to provide communication mechanisms to keep power we propose a principled framework - MANE to model grid and transportation network work in order. On the both within-layer connections and cross-layer network other hand, for some coal-fired or gas-fired power sta- dependencies simultaneously in a unified optimization tions, a well-functioning transportation network is re- framework for embedding representation learning. Ex- quired to supply fuel for those power stations. There- periments on real-world multi-layered networks corrob- fore, the three layers in the system form a triangu- orate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. lar dependency network [11]. Another example is the organization-level collaboration platform (right part of 1 Introduction Figure 1), where the team network is supported by the The prevalence of various information systems make social network, connecting its employee pool, which fur- networked data ubiquitous to our daily life, examples ther interacts with the information network, linking to include infrastructure networks, social media networks, its knowledge base. Furthermore, the social network brain networks, to name a few. Recent years have layer could have an embedded multi-layered structure witnessed many attempts to gain insights from these (e.g., each of its layers represents a different collabora- networked data by performing different graph learn- tion type among different individuals); and so does the ing tasks such as node classification [4, 21, 27], com- information network. In this case, different layers form munity detection [15, 45] and link prediction [1, 26]. a tree-structured dependency network. As the very first step, most of these algorithms need The availability and widespread of multi-layered to design hand-crafted features to enable the down- networks in real-world has motivated a surge of research. stream learning problems. One critical issue of these Recent work shows that cross-layer network dependen- hand-crafted features is that they are problem depen- cies are of vital importance in understanding the whole dent, and cannot be easily generalized to other learning systems and they have an added value over within-layer connectivities. In addition, a small portion cross-layer ∗Computer Science and Engineering, Arizona State Univer- sity, Tempe, AZ, USA. fjundongl, chen chen, hanghang.tong, [email protected] 1networks with only a single type of nodes and node-node yIndicates Equal Contribution interactions Copyright c 2018 by SIAM Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited Notations Definitions or Descriptions .)& G the layer-layer dependency matrix /2012102404(01 /)0.&,)4502.. ,)4502. A = fA1; :::; Agg within-layer connectivity matrices 1)23)% !)(-%)& D = fDi;j ; (i 6= j)g cross-layer dependency matrices *$&,)4502. $07(08&,)4502. g number of layers ni number of nodes in the i-th layer ,0.)%-/0) ")/)% d1; d2; :::; dg embedding dimensions #05)2& 2() 41502.04(01&,)4502. Fi embedding for the i-th layer Figure 1: Two typical examples of multi-layered net- Table 1: Symbols. works: critical infrastructure systems and organization- 2 Problem Definition and Preliminaries level collaboration platform. We first summarize the main symbols used in this network dependencies could improve the performance paper. We use bold uppercase for matrices (e.g., A), of many learning tasks such as link prediction remark- bold lowercase for vectors (e.g., a), normal lowercase ably [11]. Despite the fundamental importance of study- characters for scalars (e.g., a), and calligraphic for sets ing multi-layered dependencies, the development of a so- (e.g., A). Also, we follow the matrix settings in Matlab phisticated learning model which could embed nodes on to represent the i-th row of matrix A as A(i; :), the j- multi-layered networks into a continuous vector space th column as A(:; j), the (i; j)-th entry as A(i; j), the is still in its infancy. To bridge the gap, in this paper, transpose of matrix A as A0, trace of matrix A as tr(A) we study a novel problem on how to perform network if it is a square matrix, Frobenius norm of matrix A as embedding for nodes on multi-layered networks. It is a kAkF . I denotes the identity matrix. challenging problem mainly because of the following rea- Next, we introduce the following terminology to sons: (1) on multi-layered networks, cross-layer network ease the understanding of multi-layered networks. Let dependencies are introduced to the system in addition matrix G denotes the g × g layer-layer dependencies to the within-layer connectivities in each layer. Needless in a typical multi-layered network with g layers, where G(i; j) = 1 if the j-th layer depends on the i-th to say, those cross-layer network dependencies play an layer, otherwise G(i; j) = 0. Then we use a set of g important role as they also encode the node proximity matrices A = fA1; :::; Agg to represent the proximity to some extent. Hence, embedding multi-layered net- among nodes within each layer. Last, we use a set of works would be a non-trivial extension from single lay- matrices D = fDi;j; (i; j = 1; :::; g)(i 6= j)g to denote ered network embedding, since the latent node features the cross-layer network dependencies between different need to capture both within-layer connections and cross- layers. In particular, the matrix Di;j describes the layer network dependencies; (2) nodes on multi-layered cross-layer dependencies between the i-th layer and the networks come from heterogeneous data sources. Even j-th layer if G(i; j) = 1; otherwise Di;j is absent. The though they are presented in different modalities, they main symbols are summarized in Table 1. With the above notations, the problem of multi-layered network are not mutually independent and could influence each embedding is defined as follows. other. Network embedding algorithms should be able to seize their interconnections to learn a unified embedding Problem 1. Multi-Layered Network Embedding representation. To tackle the above challenges, we pro- Given: the embedding dimension d1; d2; :::; dg for dif- pose a novel multi-layered network embedding frame- ferent layers; a multi-layered network with: (1) a set work - MANE. The main contributions are as follows: of g within-layer adjacency matrices A = fA1; :::; Agg ni×ni where Ai 2 f0; 1g (i=1,...,g); and (2) observed • We formally define the problem of multi-layered cross-layer dependency matrices D = fDi;j; (i; j = ni×nj network embedding; 1; :::; g)(i 6= j)g where Dij 2 f0; 1g denotes the cross-layer network dependency between Ai and Aj; • We provide a unified optimization framework to ni×di Output: the embedding representation Fi 2 R for model both within-layer connections and cross- all nodes in the i-th layer (i = 1; :::; g). layer network dependencies for embedding repre- sentation learning on multi-layered networks; 3 Proposed Algorithm and Analysis In this section, we present a novel multi-layered network • We provide an effective alternating optimization embedding framework - MANE, which models both algorithm for the proposed MANE framework; within-layer connections and cross-layer network depen- • We evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed dencies for embedding representation learning. We first MANE framework with two real-world multi- formulate the multi-layered network embedding prob- layered networks. lem as an optimization problem and then introduce an effective alternating optimization algorithm for the pro- Copyright c 2018 by SIAM Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited posed framework. At last, we investigate the time com- In the previous subsection, we enforce the embedding plexity of the MANE framework. representations of two nodes to be close to each other in the Euclidean space if they are connected in the same 3.1 Within-Layer Connections Modeling The layer.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Breakdown of Interdependent Directed Networks Xueming Liu, ∗ † H
    i i \"SI Appendix"" | 2015/12/23 | 9:13 | page 1 | #1 i i Supporting Information: Breakdown of interdependent directed networks Xueming Liu, ∗ y H. Eugene Stanley y and Jianxi Gao z ∗Key Laboratory of Image Information Processing and Intelligent Control, School of Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China,yCenter for Polymer Studies and Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, and zCenter for Complex Network Research and Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115 Submitted to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America I. Notions related to interdependent networks Multiplex networks. The agents (nodes) participate in ev- Both natural and engineered complex systems are not isolated ery layer of the network simultaneously. The connections but interdependent and interconnected. Such diverse infras- among these agents in different layers represent different tructures as water supply systems, transportation networks, relationships [14, 15, 28, 29, 13, 30, 31]. For example, a fuel delivery systems, and power stations are coupled together user of online social networks can subscribe to two or more [1]. To study the interdependence between networks, Buldyrev networks and build social relationships with other users on et al. [2] developed an analytic framework based on the gener- a range of social platforms (e.g., LinkedIn for a network of ating function formalism [3, 4] and discovered that the interde- professional contacts or Facebook for a network of friends) pendence between networks sharply increases system vulner- [11, 14]. ability, because node failures in one network can lead to the Temporal networks.
    [Show full text]
  • What Metrics Really Mean, a Question of Causality and Construction in Leveraging Social Media Audiences Into Business Results: Cases from the UK Film Industry
    . Volume 10, Issue 2 November 2013 What metrics really mean, a question of causality and construction in leveraging social media audiences into business results: Cases from the UK film industry Michael Franklin, University of St Andrews, UK Summary: Digital distribution and sustained audience engagement potentially offer filmmakers new business models for responding to decreasing revenues from DVD and TV rights. Key to campaigns that aim at enrolling audiences, mitigating demand uncertainty and improving revenues, is the management of digital media metrics. This process crucially involves the interpretation of figures where a causal gap exists between some digital activity and a market transaction. This paper charts the conceptual framing methods and calculations of value necessary to manipulating and utilising the audience in a new way. The invisible aspects and mediating role of contemporary creative industries audiences is presented through empirical case study evidence from two UK feature films. Practitioners’ understanding of digital engagement metrics is shown to be a social construction involving the agency of material artefacts as powerful elements of networks that include both market entities and audiences. Keywords: Film Business; Social Media; Market Device; Valuation; Digital Engagement Introduction The affordances of digital technology for audience engagement and more direct, or dis- intermediated distribution, prompt a reappraisal of the role of audiences in the film industry. Through digital tools, most significantly through social media, audiences are made material. Audiences are interacted with, engaged, marketed to, and financially exploited often visible all their social network connections, but they are also aggregated, manipulated and exert an agency that is much less visible and plays out off-screen.
    [Show full text]
  • A Network-Of-Networks Percolation Analysis of Cascading Failures in Spatially Co-Located Road-Sewer Infrastructure Networks
    Physica A 538 (2020) 122971 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physica A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/physa A network-of-networks percolation analysis of cascading failures in spatially co-located road-sewer infrastructure networks ∗ ∗ Shangjia Dong a, , Haizhong Wang a, , Alireza Mostafizi a, Xuan Song b a School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States of America b Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China article info a b s t r a c t Article history: This paper presents a network-of-networks analysis framework of interdependent crit- Received 26 September 2018 ical infrastructure systems, with a focus on the co-located road-sewer network. The Received in revised form 28 May 2019 constructed interdependency considers two types of node dynamics: co-located and Available online 27 September 2019 multiple-to-one dependency, with different robustness metrics based on their function Keywords: logic. The objectives of this paper are twofold: (1) to characterize the impact of the Co-located road-sewer network interdependency on networks' robustness performance, and (2) to unveil the critical Network-of-networks percolation transition threshold of the interdependent road-sewer network. The results Percolation modeling show that (1) road and sewer networks are mutually interdependent and are vulnerable Infrastructure interdependency to the cascading failures initiated by sewer system disruption; (2) the network robust- Cascading failure ness decreases as the number of initial failure sources increases in the localized failure scenarios, but the rate declines as the number of failures increase; and (3) the sewer network contains two types of links: zero exposure and severe exposure to liquefaction, and therefore, it leads to a two-phase percolation transition subject to the probabilistic liquefaction-induced failures.
    [Show full text]
  • Multilayer Networks
    Journal of Complex Networks (2014) 2, 203–271 doi:10.1093/comnet/cnu016 Advance Access publication on 14 July 2014 Multilayer networks Mikko Kivelä Oxford Centre for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK Alex Arenas Departament d’Enginyeria Informática i Matemátiques, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain Marc Barthelemy Downloaded from Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA, CNRS-URA 2306, F-91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, France and Centre d’Analyse et de Mathématiques Sociales, EHESS, 190-198 avenue de France, 75244 Paris, France James P. Gleeson MACSI, Department of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland http://comnet.oxfordjournals.org/ Yamir Moreno Institute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI), University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza 50018, Spain and Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza 50009, Spain and Mason A. Porter† Oxford Centre for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, by guest on August 21, 2014 Oxford OX2 6GG, UK and CABDyN Complexity Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1HP, UK †Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Edited by: Ernesto Estrada [Received on 16 October 2013; accepted on 23 April 2014] In most natural and engineered systems, a set of entities interact with each other in complicated patterns that can encompass multiple types of relationships, change in time and include other types of complications. Such systems include multiple subsystems and layers of connectivity, and it is important to take such ‘multilayer’ features into account to try to improve our understanding of complex systems. Consequently, it is necessary to generalize ‘traditional’ network theory by developing (and validating) a framework and associated tools to study multilayer systems in a comprehensive fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • Multidimensional Network Analysis
    Universita` degli Studi di Pisa Dipartimento di Informatica Dottorato di Ricerca in Informatica Ph.D. Thesis Multidimensional Network Analysis Michele Coscia Supervisor Supervisor Fosca Giannotti Dino Pedreschi May 9, 2012 Abstract This thesis is focused on the study of multidimensional networks. A multidimensional network is a network in which among the nodes there may be multiple different qualitative and quantitative relations. Traditionally, complex network analysis has focused on networks with only one kind of relation. Even with this constraint, monodimensional networks posed many analytic challenges, being representations of ubiquitous complex systems in nature. However, it is a matter of common experience that the constraint of considering only one single relation at a time limits the set of real world phenomena that can be represented with complex networks. When multiple different relations act at the same time, traditional complex network analysis cannot provide suitable an- alytic tools. To provide the suitable tools for this scenario is exactly the aim of this thesis: the creation and study of a Multidimensional Network Analysis, to extend the toolbox of complex network analysis and grasp the complexity of real world phenomena. The urgency and need for a multidimensional network analysis is here presented, along with an empirical proof of the ubiquity of this multifaceted reality in different complex networks, and some related works that in the last two years were proposed in this novel setting, yet to be systematically defined. Then, we tackle the foundations of the multidimensional setting at different levels, both by looking at the basic exten- sions of the known model and by developing novel algorithms and frameworks for well-understood and useful problems, such as community discovery (our main case study), temporal analysis, link prediction and more.
    [Show full text]
  • A Network Approach to Define Modularity of Components In
    A Network Approach to Define Modularity of Components Manuel E. Sosa1 Technology and Operations Management Area, in Complex Products INSEAD, 77305 Fontainebleau, France Modularity has been defined at the product and system levels. However, little effort has e-mail: [email protected] gone into defining and quantifying modularity at the component level. We consider com- plex products as a network of components that share technical interfaces (or connections) Steven D. Eppinger in order to function as a whole and define component modularity based on the lack of Sloan School of Management, connectivity among them. Building upon previous work in graph theory and social net- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, work analysis, we define three measures of component modularity based on the notion of Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 centrality. Our measures consider how components share direct interfaces with adjacent components, how design interfaces may propagate to nonadjacent components in the Craig M. Rowles product, and how components may act as bridges among other components through their Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, interfaces. We calculate and interpret all three measures of component modularity by East Hartford, Connecticut 06108 studying the product architecture of a large commercial aircraft engine. We illustrate the use of these measures to test the impact of modularity on component redesign. Our results show that the relationship between component modularity and component redesign de- pends on the type of interfaces connecting product components. We also discuss direc- tions for future work. ͓DOI: 10.1115/1.2771182͔ 1 Introduction The need to measure modularity has been highlighted implicitly by Saleh ͓12͔ in his recent invitation “to contribute to the growing Previous research on product architecture has defined modular- field of flexibility in system design” ͑p.
    [Show full text]
  • Cascading Failures in Interdependent Networks with Multiple Supply-Demand Links and Functionality Thresholds Supplementary Information M
    Cascading Failures in Interdependent Networks with Multiple Supply-Demand Links and Functionality Thresholds Supplementary Information M. A. Di Muro1,*, L. D. Valdez2,3, H. H. Aragao˜ Regoˆ 4, S. V. Buldyrev5, H.E. Stanley6, and L. A. Braunstein1,6 1Instituto de Investigaciones F´ısicas de Mar del Plata (IFIMAR)-Departamento de F´ısica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata-CONICET, Funes 3350, (7600) Mar del Plata, Argentina. 2Instituto de F´ısica Enrique Gaviola, CONICET, Ciudad Universitaria, 5000 Cordoba,´ Argentina. 3Facultad de Matematica,´ Astronom´ıa, F´ısica y Computacion,´ Universidad Nacional de Cordoba,´ Cordoba,´ Argentina 4Departamento de F´ısica, Instituto Federal de Educac¸ao,˜ Cienciaˆ e Tecnologia do Maranhao,˜ Sao˜ Lu´ıs, MA, 65030-005, Brazil 5Department of Physics, Yeshiva University, 500 West 185th Street, New York, New York 10033, USA 6Center for Polymer Studies, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA *[email protected] Explicit form of the functionality rules Giant component The giant component in a network is the largest connected component. Most functioning networks are completely connected, but when they experience failure, finite components—little islands of nodes— become disconnected from the giant component. A common functionality rule states that nodes in these finite components have insufficient support to remain active. Thus in addition to the nodes rendered inactive by failure, the exacerbation factor renders inactive all nodes not connected to the giant component. If network X has a degree distribution PX (k) and a fraction 1 − yX of nodes is randomly removed, the X X X exacerbation factor gX is gX (yX ) = 1 − G0 [1 − yX (1 − f¥ )], where f¥ is the probability that the branches X X X do not expand to infinity, and it satisfies the recurrent equation f¥ = G1 [1 − yX (1 − f¥ )].
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Applications of Community Detection
    Volume 6, Issue 4, April 2016 ISSN: 2277 128X International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering Research Paper Available online at: www.ijarcsse.com Practical Applications of Community Detection Mini Singh Ahuja1, Jatinder Singh2, Neha3 1 Research Scholar, Department of Computer Science, Punjab Technical University, Punjab, India 2 Professor, Department of Computer Science, KC Group of Institutes Nawashahr, Punjab, India 3 Student (M.Tech), Department of Computer Science, Regional Campus Gurdaspur, Punjab, India Abstract: Network is a collection of entities that are interconnected with links. The widespread use of social media applications like youtube, flicker, facebook is responsible for evolution of more complex networks. Online social networks like facebook and twitter are very large and dynamic complex networks. Community is a group of nodes that are more densely connected as compared to nodes outside the community. Within the community nodes are more likely to be connected but less likely to be connected with nodes of other communities. Community detection in such networks is one of the most challenging tasks. Community structures provide solutions to many real world problems. In this paper we have discussed about various applications areas of community structures in complex network. Keywords: complex network, community structures, applications of community structures, online social networks, community detection algorithms……. etc. I. INTRODUCTION Network is a collection of entities called nodes or vertices which are connected through edges or links. Computers that are connected, web pages that link to each other, group of friends are basic examples of network. Complex network is a group of interacting entities with some non trivial dynamical behavior [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Multilayer Networks!
    Multilayer networks! Mikko Kivelä Assistant professor @bolozna www.mkivela.com C&)*$+, S-"%+)" Tutorial @ The 9th International Conference on @!".##$%&.'( Complex Networks and their Applications Outline 1. Why multilayer networks 2. Conceptual and mathematical framework 3. Multilayer network systems and data 4. How to analyse multilayer networks 5. Dynamics and multilayer networks 6. Tools an packages Why multilayer networks? Networks are everywhere Nodes Links Neurons, Synapses, brain areas axons Friendships, People phys. contacts, kinships, … Species, Genetic similarity, populations trophic interactions, individuals competition Genes, Regulatory proteins relationships Network representations – are simple graphs enough? vs Example: Sociograms G. C. Homans. ”Human Group”, Routledge 1951 F. Roethlisberger, W. Dickson. ”Management and the worker”, Cambridge University Press 1939 Example: Multivariate social networks S. Wasserman, K. Faust. ”Social Network Analysis”, Cambridge University Press 1994 Example: Cognitive social structures D. Krackhardt 1987 Example: Temporal networks M. Kivelä, R. K. Pan, K. Kaski, J. Kertész, J. Saramäki, M. Karsai: Multiscale analysis of spreading in a large communication network, J. Stat. Mech. 3 P03005 (2012) Example: Interdependent infrastructure networks S. V. Buldyrev, R. Parshani, G. Paul, H. E. Stanley, S. Havlin. ”Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks”, Nature 464:1025 2010 Example: UK infrastructure networks (Courtesy of Scott Thacker, ITRC, University of Oxford) More realistic network representations Interacting networks Temporal networks Multiplex networks Multidimensional Overlay networks networks Networks of networks Interdependent networks More realistic network representations Interacting networks Temporal networks Multiplex networks Multilayer networks Multidimensional Overlay networks networks Networks of networks Interdependent networks Conceptual and mathematical framework Review article on multilayer networks M. Kivelä, A. Arenas, M. Barthelemy, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Percolation in Real Interdependent Networks
    ARTICLES PUBLISHED ONLINE: 15 JUNE 2015 | DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS3374 Percolation in real interdependent networks Filippo Radicchi The function of a real network depends not only on the reliability of its own components, but is aected also by the simultaneous operation of other real networks coupled with it. Whereas theoretical methods of direct applicability to real isolated networks exist, the frameworks developed so far in percolation theory for interdependent network layers are of little help in practical contexts, as they are suited only for special models in the limit of infinite size. Here, we introduce a set of heuristic equations that takes as inputs the adjacency matrices of the layers to draw the entire phase diagram for the interconnected network. We demonstrate that percolation transitions in interdependent networks can be understood by decomposing these systems into uncoupled graphs: the intersection among the layers, and the remainders of the layers. When the intersection dominates the remainders, an interconnected network undergoes a smooth percolation transition. Conversely, if the intersection is dominated by the contribution of the remainders, the transition becomes abrupt even in small networks. We provide examples of real systems that have developed interdependent networks sharing cores of ‘high quality’ edges to prevent catastrophic failures. ercolation is among the most studied topics in statistical largest cluster of mutually connected nodes16. A cluster of mutually physics1. The model used to mimic percolation processes connected nodes is a set of vertices with the property that every node Passumes the existence of an underlying network of arbitrary in the cluster has at least one neighbour belonging to that cluster in structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Degree Heterogeneity on Attack Vulnerability
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Impact of Degree Heterogeneity on Attack Vulnerability of Interdependent Networks Received: 30 January 2016 Shiwen Sun1,2, Yafang Wu1,2, Yilin Ma1,2, Li Wang1,2, Zhongke Gao3 & Chengyi Xia1,2 Accepted: 15 August 2016 The study of interdependent networks has become a new research focus in recent years. We focus on Published: 09 September 2016 one fundamental property of interdependent networks: vulnerability. Previous studies mainly focused on the impact of topological properties upon interdependent networks under random attacks, the effect of degree heterogeneity on structural vulnerability of interdependent networks under intentional attacks, however, is still unexplored. In order to deeply understand the role of degree distribution and in particular degree heterogeneity, we construct an interdependent system model which consists of two networks whose extent of degree heterogeneity can be controlled simultaneously by a tuning parameter. Meanwhile, a new quantity, which can better measure the performance of interdependent networks after attack, is proposed. Numerical simulation results demonstrate that degree heterogeneity can significantly increase the vulnerability of both single and interdependent networks. Moreover, it is found that interdependent links between two networks make the entire system much more fragile to attacks. Enhancing coupling strength between networks can greatly increase the fragility of both networks against targeted attacks, which is most evident under the case of max-max assortative coupling. Current results can help to deepen the understanding of structural complexity of complex real-world systems. Complex network is an important tool used to describe and analyze the structure and dynamical behaviors of complex systems1–3. Since real-world complex systems are becoming increasingly dependent on one another, the study of interdependent networks has become another new active topic in network science4,5.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Network Analysis with Content and Graphs
    SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS WITH CONTENT AND GRAPHS Social Network Analysis with Content and Graphs William M. Campbell, Charlie K. Dagli, and Clifford J. Weinstein Social network analysis has undergone a As a consequence of changing economic renaissance with the ubiquity and quantity of » and social realities, the increased availability of large-scale, real-world sociographic data content from social media, web pages, and has ushered in a new era of research and sensors. This content is a rich data source for development in social network analysis. The quantity of constructing and analyzing social networks, but content-based data created every day by traditional and social media, sensors, and mobile devices provides great its enormity and unstructured nature also present opportunities and unique challenges for the automatic multiple challenges. Work at Lincoln Laboratory analysis, prediction, and summarization in the era of what is addressing the problems in constructing has been dubbed “Big Data.” Lincoln Laboratory has been networks from unstructured data, analyzing the investigating approaches for computational social network analysis that focus on three areas: constructing social net- community structure of a network, and inferring works, analyzing the structure and dynamics of a com- information from networks. Graph analytics munity, and developing inferences from social networks. have proven to be valuable tools in solving these Network construction from general, real-world data presents several unexpected challenges owing to the data challenges. Through the use of these tools, domains themselves, e.g., information extraction and pre- Laboratory researchers have achieved promising processing, and to the data structures used for knowledge results on real-world data.
    [Show full text]