Advanced Approaches to High Intensity Laser-Driven Ion Acceleration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Advanced Approaches to High Intensity Laser-Driven Ion Acceleration Advanced Approaches to High Intensity Laser-Driven Ion Acceleration Andreas Henig M¨unchen2010 Advanced Approaches to High Intensity Laser-Driven Ion Acceleration Andreas Henig Dissertation an der Fakult¨atf¨urPhysik der Ludwig{Maximilians{Universit¨at M¨unchen vorgelegt von Andreas Henig aus W¨urzburg M¨unchen, den 18. M¨arz2010 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Dietrich Habs Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Toshiki Tajima Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung:26. April 2010 Contents Contentsv List of Figures ix Abstract xiii Zusammenfassung xv 1 Introduction1 1.1 History and Previous Achievements...................1 1.2 Envisioned Applications.........................3 1.3 Thesis Outline...............................5 2 Theoretical Background9 2.1 Ionization.................................9 2.2 Relativistic Single Electron Dynamics.................. 14 2.2.1 Electron Trajectory in a Linearly Polarized Plane Wave.... 15 2.2.2 Electron Trajectory in a Circularly Polarized Plane Wave... 17 2.2.3 Electron Ejection from a Focussed Laser Beam......... 18 2.3 Laser Propagation in a Plasma..................... 18 2.4 Laser Absorption in Overdense Plasmas................. 20 2.4.1 Collisional Absorption...................... 20 2.4.2 Collisionless Absorption..................... 21 2.5 Ion Acceleration.............................. 22 2.5.1 Target Normal Sheath Acceleration (TNSA).......... 22 2.5.2 Shock Acceleration........................ 26 2.5.3 Radiation Pressure Acceleration / Light Sail / Laser Piston. 27 3 Experimental Methods I - High Intensity Laser Systems 33 3.1 Fundamentals of Ultrashort High Intensity Pulse Generation..... 33 vi CONTENTS 3.1.1 The Concept of Mode-Locking.................. 33 3.1.2 Time-Bandwidth Product.................... 37 3.1.3 Chirped Pulse Amplification................... 39 3.1.4 Optical Parametric Amplification (OPA)............ 40 3.2 Laser Systems Utilized for Ion Acceleration Studies.......... 44 3.2.1 The ATLAS Laser Facility.................... 44 3.2.2 The MBI Ti:sapphire System.................. 48 3.2.3 The TRIDENT Laser Facility.................. 50 3.2.4 The VULCAN Laser Facility................... 54 4 Experimental Methods II - Targets and Ion Beam Diagnostics 57 4.1 Target Fabrication and Characterization................ 57 4.1.1 Microspheres........................... 57 4.1.2 Ultra-Thin Diamond-Like Carbon (DLC) Foils......... 60 4.2 Ion Beam Diagnostics........................... 65 4.2.1 Detectors............................. 65 4.2.2 Measuring Instruments...................... 71 5 Shock Acceleration of Ion Beams from Spherical Targets 77 5.1 Experimental Setup............................ 78 5.2 Measured Ion Beams........................... 81 5.3 PIC Simulations.............................. 82 5.4 Analytical Model............................. 84 5.5 Summary/Conclusion/Outlook...................... 85 6 Enhanced Ion Acceleration in the Transparency Regime 87 6.1 Experimental Setup............................ 89 6.2 Measured Ion Beams........................... 91 6.3 PIC Simulations.............................. 93 6.4 Analytical Model............................. 96 6.5 Increasing the Intensity.......................... 99 6.5.1 Measured Ion Beams....................... 101 6.6 Summary and Conclusion........................ 102 7 Radiation Pressure Dominated Acceleration of Ions 103 7.1 Experimental Setup............................ 105 7.2 Measured Ion Beams........................... 106 7.3 PIC Simulations.............................. 108 CONTENTS vii 7.4 Summary/Conclusion/Outlook...................... 111 8 ATLAS-Driven Short Pulse Pumped OPCPA 115 8.1 Motivation for SPP-OPCPA....................... 115 8.2 Experimental Setup............................ 116 8.3 Results and Discussion.......................... 120 8.4 Conclusion and Outlook......................... 123 9 Summary, Conclusions and Future Perspectives 125 9.1 Summary and Conclusions........................ 125 9.2 Future Plans and Perspectives...................... 130 9.2.1 Improving the Ion Beam Quality................ 130 9.2.2 Paving the Way Towards Applications............. 133 Bibliography 137 Publications 163 Acknowledgements 167 viii List of Figures 1.1 Time-integrated CCD camera image of the laser-plasma interaction.3 1.2 Light sail acceleration dominated by the laser radiation pressure...8 2.1 Distortion of the atomic potential subject to a strong laser field... 11 2.2 Relativistic electron trajectory in a linearly polarized plane wave... 16 2.3 Relativistic electron trajectory in a circularly polarized plane wave.. 17 2.4 Main mechanisms for ion acceleration from an overdense, opaque target 24 2.5 Radiation Pressure Acceleration (RPA)................. 29 3.1 Intensity pattern resulting from NM = 9 locked modes and a constant frequency spectrum............................ 34 3.2 Kerr-lens mode-locking.......................... 36 3.3 Chirped Pulse Amplification (CPA)................... 39 3.4 NOPA vs. conventional four-level laser system............. 41 3.5 Setup of the ATLAS laser system.................... 45 3.6 3rd order autocorrelation trace of the ATLAS laser system...... 47 3.7 Setup of the MBI laser system...................... 49 3.8 MBI laser contrast and schematic of the double plasma mirror.... 50 3.9 Setup of the TRIDENT laser front end - type 0............ 51 3.10 Setup of the TRIDENT laser front end - type 1............ 51 3.11 Self-pumped OPA at TRIDENT frontend................ 52 3.12 TRIDENT contrast............................ 53 4.1 Microsphere target fabrication...................... 58 4.2 Mounted gold microsphere........................ 59 4.3 Cathodic Arc Deposition......................... 61 4.4 DLC foil thickness characterization via AFM measurements..... 63 4.5 ERDA scheme and obtained DLC depth profile............ 65 4.6 Ion induced tracks on CR39....................... 67 x LIST OF FIGURES 4.7 Configuration of radiochromic film (RCF)............... 68 4.8 MCP detector cross section and high voltage circuit.......... 70 4.9 Thomson parabola spectrometer setup and resulting ion traces.... 71 4.10 Ion energy loss distributions in CR39.................. 73 4.11 CR39 detector stack........................... 74 5.1 Experimental setup for ion acceleration from microspheres...... 78 5.2 Microsphere target imaging....................... 79 5.3 Proton beam profile and spectrum.................... 81 5.4 Simulated proton density distribution and origin of most energetic ions 83 6.1 Experimental setup on the first TRIDENT campaign......... 90 6.2 TRIDENT double plasma mirror setup................. 91 6.3 Proton beam profiles at different energies................ 92 6.4 Fully ionized carbon spectra for varying target thicknesses...... 93 6.5 Electron density and electric field distribution from 2D PIC simula- tions of a 10 nm foil target........................ 94 6.6 Spatial distribution of proton and carbon energies from 2D PIC sim- ulations of a 10 nm foil target...................... 96 6.7 Maximum ion energies over target thickness observed at increased intensities of 2×1020 W=cm2 and a measured carbon C6+ ion spectrum extending beyond 0.5 GeV........................ 101 7.1 Maximum proton and carbon C6+ energies over target thickness for linearly and circularly polarized irradiation and corresponding elec- tron spectra measured at the optimum target thickness d = 5:3 nm.. 106 7.2 Experimentally observed and simulated proton and carbon C6+ spec- tra for linear and circular polarized irradiation of a 5.3 nm thickness DLC foil.................................. 107 7.3 Simulated carbon ion phase space for linearly and circularly polarized irradiation................................. 109 7.4 Simulated electron and carbon ion density for linearly and circularly polarized irradiation........................... 110 7.5 Microscopic image of a prototype for future shaped DLC targets... 112 8.1 Schematic setup of the ATLAS OPCPA stage............. 117 8.2 Spectral broadening in a filament.................... 118 8.3 Pulse front matching........................... 119 LIST OF FIGURES xi 8.4 OPCPA spectrum and corresponding transform-limited pulse..... 121 8.5 SPIDER characterization of OPCPA signal............... 122 8.6 Pump beam near-fied profile and signal focusability.......... 123 9.1 Biomedical beamline at MPQ...................... 134 xii Abstract Since the pioneering work that was carried out 10 years ago [1{4], the generation of highly energetic ion beams from laser-plasma interactions has been investigated in much detail in the regime of target normal sheath acceleration (TNSA). Creation of ion beams with small longitudinal and transverse emittance and energies extending up to tens of MeV fueled visions of compact, laser-driven ion sources for applications such as ion beam therapy of tumors or fast ignition inertial confinement fusion. However, new pathways are of crucial importance to push the current limits of laser- generated ion beams further towards parameters necessary for those applications. The presented PhD work was intended to develop and explore advanced ap- proaches to high intensity laser-driven ion acceleration that reach beyond TNSA. In this spirit, ion acceleration from two novel target systems was investigated, namely mass-limited microspheres and nm-thin, free-standing diamond-like carbon (DLC) foils. Using such ultrathin foils, a new regime of ion acceleration was found where the laser transfers energy to all electrons located within the focal volume. While for TNSA the accelerating electric
Recommended publications
  • High Energy Density Physics Experiments at Los Alamos
    High Energy Density Dante-2 SXI Physics Experiments at Los Alamos FFLEX FABS & Hans Herrmann NBI FABS & 36B NBI 31B Dante-1 Plasma Physics Group (P-24) SXI In this photo, Norris Bradbury, Robert Oppenheimer, Richard Feynman, and Enrico Fermi attend an early Los Alamos weapons colloquium. OMEGA LaserU UserN C L A S SGroup I F I E D Rochester, NY April 29, 2011 Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA LA-UR 11-02522 Los Alamos has a strong program in High Energy Density Physics aimed at National Applications as well as Basic Science Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) Radiation Hydrodynamics Hydrodynamics with Plasmas Material Dynamics Energetic Ion generation Dense Plasma Properties X-ray and Nuclear Diagnostic Development Petaflop performance to Exascale computing Magnetic Reconnection Magnetized Target Fusion High-Explosive Pulsed Power U N C L A S S I F I E D Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA LANL is a multidisciplinary NNSA Lab. overseen by Los Alamos National Security (LANS) LLC. People 11,782 total employees: LANS, LLC 9,665; SOC Los Alamos (Guard Force) 477; Contractors 524; Students 1,116 Place Located 35 miles northwest of Santa Fe, New Mexico, on 36 square miles of DOE-owned property. > 2,000 individual facilities, 47 technical areas with 8 million square feet under roof, $5.9 B replacement value. Operating costs FY 2010: ~ $2 billion 51% NNSA weapons programs 8% Nonproliferation programs 6% Safeguards and Security 11% Environmental Management 4% DOE Office of Science 5% Energy and other programs 15% Work for Others Workforce Demographics (LANS & students only) 42% of employees live in Los Alamos, the rest commute from Santa Fe, Española, Taos, and Albuquerque.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Ignition Facility Diagnostic Set at the Completion of the National Ignition Campaign, September 2012
    Fusion Science and Technology ISSN: 1536-1055 (Print) 1943-7641 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ufst20 The National Ignition Facility Diagnostic Set at the Completion of the National Ignition Campaign, September 2012 J. D. Kilkenny, P. M. Bell, D. K. Bradley, D. L. Bleuel, J. A. Caggiano, E. L. Dewald, W. W. Hsing, D. H. Kalantar, R. L. Kauffman, D. J. Larson, J. D. Moody, D. H. Schneider, M. B. Schneider, D. A. Shaughnessy, R. T. Shelton, W. Stoeffl, K. Widmann, C. B. Yeamans, S. H. Batha, G. P. Grim, H. W. Herrmann, F. E. Merrill, R. J. Leeper, J. A. Oertel, T. C. Sangster, D. H. Edgell, M. Hohenberger, V. Yu. Glebov, S. P. Regan, J. A. Frenje, M. Gatu-Johnson, R. D. Petrasso, H. G. Rinderknecht, A. B. Zylstra, G. W. Cooper & C. Ruizf To cite this article: J. D. Kilkenny, P. M. Bell, D. K. Bradley, D. L. Bleuel, J. A. Caggiano, E. L. Dewald, W. W. Hsing, D. H. Kalantar, R. L. Kauffman, D. J. Larson, J. D. Moody, D. H. Schneider, M. B. Schneider, D. A. Shaughnessy, R. T. Shelton, W. Stoeffl, K. Widmann, C. B. Yeamans, S. H. Batha, G. P. Grim, H. W. Herrmann, F. E. Merrill, R. J. Leeper, J. A. Oertel, T. C. Sangster, D. H. Edgell, M. Hohenberger, V. Yu. Glebov, S. P. Regan, J. A. Frenje, M. Gatu-Johnson, R. D. Petrasso, H. G. Rinderknecht, A. B. Zylstra, G. W. Cooper & C. Ruizf (2016) The National Ignition Facility Diagnostic Set at the Completion of the National Ignition Campaign, September 2012, Fusion Science and Technology, 69:1, 420-451, DOI: 10.13182/FST15-173 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/FST15-173 Published online: 23 Mar 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Upgrade to the Vulcan Laser System to Support the TAW Upgrade
    LASER SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT I Vulcan 7 Upgrade to the Vulcan laser system to support the TAW upgrade Contact [email protected] B. T. Parry, T. B. Winstone, P. N. Anderson, A. J. Frackiewicz, M. Galimberti, S. Hancock, C. Hernandez-Gomez, A. K. Kidd, M. M. Notley, M. Read and C. Wise Central Laser Facility, STFC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, HSIC, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, UK Introduction chains. One of the rod amplifier beam lines is split The Vulcan laser facility has recently been upgraded to into two to form beams 7 and 8, the other is split into deliver an additional short pulse beam to Target Area beams 1-6. Beams 7 and 8 are normally used as short West (TAW) [1]. This new beamline is capable of pulse (CPA) beamlines. operating in the same mode as the previously existing Modelling showed that the extra amplification needed one, at energies up to 100 J in 1 ps. It also allows the to deliver the increased energy could be carried out at laser to reach new, previously inaccessible regimes, smaller beam diameter while still keeping the B-integral with the capability to deliver up to 500 J in pulses of below three, the limit for what was acceptable for a 10 ps or longer (100ps max). 10 ps pulse. This meant that rod amplifiers, rather than The increase in the delivered energy was made possible large, costly disk amplifiers, could be used. An by the use of dielectric gratings for this new 10 ps additional 45 mm diameter rod amplifier was installed beamline.
    [Show full text]
  • Plasma Interactions
    Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience New developments in energy transfer and transport studies in relativistic laser–plasma interactions This article has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text article. 2010 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 52 124046 (http://iopscience.iop.org/0741-3335/52/12/124046) View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more Download details: IP Address: 130.183.90.175 The article was downloaded on 04/01/2011 at 10:43 Please note that terms and conditions apply. IOP PUBLISHING PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 52 (2010) 124046 (7pp) doi:10.1088/0741-3335/52/12/124046 New developments in energy transfer and transport studies in relativistic laser–plasma interactions P A Norreys1,2,JSGreen1, K L Lancaster1,APLRobinson1, R H H Scott1,2, F Perez3, H-P Schlenvoight3, S Baton3, S Hulin4, B Vauzour4, J J Santos4, D J Adams5, K Markey5, B Ramakrishna5, M Zepf5, M N Quinn6,XHYuan6, P McKenna6, J Schreiber2,7, J R Davies8, D P Higginson9,10, F N Beg9, C Chen10,TMa10 and P Patel10 1 Central Laser Facility, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, UK 2 Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BZ, UK 3 Laboratoire pour l’Utilisation des Lasers Intenses, Ecole´ Polytechnique, route de Saclay, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France 4 Centre Lasers Intenses et Applications, Universite´ Bordeaux 1-CNRS-CEA, Talence, France 5 School of Mathematics and Physics, Queens University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK 6 Departmnet of Physics, University of Strathclyde, John Anderson Building, 107 Rottenrow, Glasgow G4 0NG, UK 7 Max-Planck-Institut fur¨ Quantenoptik, Hans-Kopfermann-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • B O O K O F a B Stra C Ts
    Book of Abstracts Program Tuesday, June 25 11:00-13:00 Registration 12:00-13:50 Lunch 13:50-14:00 Welcome UHI 1 Chair : L. Yin 14:00-14:30 A. Kemp Kinetic particle-in-cell modeling of Petawatt laser plasma interaction relevant to HEDLP experiments 14:30-14:50 R. Shah Dynamics and Application of Relativistic Transparency 14:50-15:10 C. Ridgers QED effects at UI laser intensities 15:10-15:30 L. Cao Efficient Laser Absorption, Enhanced Electron Yields and Collimated Fast Electrons by the Nanolayered Structured Targets 15:30-16:00 Coffee break Laboratory Astrophysics 1 Chair : P. Drake 16:00-16:30 J. Bailey Laboratory opacity measurements at conditions approaching stellar interiors 16:30-16:50 A. Pak Radiative shock waves produced from implosion experiments at the National Ignition Facility 16:50-17:10 B. Albertazzi Modeling in the Laboratory Magnetized Astrophysical Jets: Simulations and Experiments 17:10-17:30 C. Kuranz Magnetized Plasma Flow Experiments at High-Energy-Density Facilities Wednesday, June 26 ( Joint with WDM ) ICF 1 Chair : A. Casner 09:00-09:40 N. Landen Status of the ignition campaign at the NIF 09:40-10:00 G. Huser Equation of state and mean ionization of Ge-doped CH ablator materials 10:00-10:20 B. Remington Hydrodynamic instabilities and mix in the ignition campaign on NIF: predictions, observations, and a path forward 10:20-10:40 M. Olazabal Laser imprint reduction using underdense foams and its consequences on the hydrodynamic instability growth 10:40-11:10 Coffee break XFEL Chair : B.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    First LMJ-PETAL User Meeting October 4-5, 2018 Le Barp, France Book of Abstracts Program LMJ-PETAL User Meeting Thursday 4 October 2018 Schedule Duration Title Speaker Institution 8:00 AM 0:30 Accueil ILP 8:30 AM 0:30 Welcome Plenary session-1 : LMJ-PETAL performance Chairman : JL. Miquel CEA/DAM CEA/DAM, 9:00 AM 0:25 LMJ Facility: Status and Performance P. Delmas France CEA/DAM, 9:25 AM 0:25 PETAL laser performance N. Blanchot France CEA/DAM, 9:50 AM 0:25 Status on LMJ-PETAL plasma diagnostics R. Wrobel France Preliminary results from the qualification experiments of the PETAL+ 10:15 AM 0:25 D. Batani CELIA, France diagnostics 10:40 AM 0:20 Break Plenary session-2: Next user experiments Chairman : D. Batani CELIA Effect of hot electrons on strong shock generation in the context of shock 11:00 AM 0:25 S. Baton LULI, France ignition 11:25 AM 0:25 Investigating magnetic reconnection in ICF conditions S. Bolanos LULI, France Efficient Creation of High-Energy-Density-State with Laser-Produced Strong S. Fujioka ILE, Osaka U., 11:50 AM 0:25 Magnetic Field or K. Matsuo Japan 12:15 PM 2:00 Lunch / Posters session 2:15 PM 1:30 Round table -1 Targets Chairman: M. Manuel General Atomic CEA/DAM, 0:20 Target laboratory on LMJ Facility O. Henry France Review of General Atomics Target Fabrication : Facilities, Capabilities and General Atomic, 0:20 M. Manuel Notable Recent Developments USA Diagnostics Chairman: W.Theobald LLE Omega ILE, Osaka U., 0:20 Visualization of fast heated plasma by X-ray fresnel phase zone plate K.
    [Show full text]
  • JAERI -Review 2004-030
    JAERI -Review 2004-030 ANNUAL REPORT OF KANSAI RESEARCH ESTABLISHMENT 2003 APRIL 1,2003-MARCH 31,2004 Kansai Research Establishment Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute hit, (T319-1195 (T319-H95 This report is issued irregularly. Inquiries about availability of the reports should be addressed to Research Information Division, Department of Intellectual Resources, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Tokai-mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki-ken T319—1195, Japan ©Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2005 B * m =F ts m JAERI-Review 2004-030 Annual Report of Kansai Research Establishment 2003 April 1, 2003-March 31, 2004 Kansai Research Establishment Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Kizu-cho, Souraku-gun, Kyoto-fu (Received December 14, 2004) This report is the fifth issue of the annual report of Kansai Research Establishment, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute. It covers status reports of R&D and results of experiments conducted at the Advanced Photon Research Center and the Synchrotron Radiation Research Center during the period from April 1, 2003 to March 31, 2004. Keywords: Annual Report, Kansai Research Establishment, JAERI, R&D, Advanced Photon Research Center, Synchrotron Radiation Research Center, SPring-8 Board of Editors for Annual Report Editors: Akira NAGASHIMA (Editor-in-chief), Jun'ichiro MIZUKI, Katsutoshi A0K1, Koichi YAMAKAWA, Keisuke NAGASHIMA, Hiroyuki DAIDO, Masato KOIKE, Yuichi SHIMIZU, Mitsuru YAMAGIWA, Eisuke MINEHARA, Taikan HARAMl, Yuji BAB A, Yoichi MURAKAMI, Koji MURAMATSU, Hisazumi AKAI Editorial Assistants: Noboru TSUCHIDA, Shintaro EJIRI, Sayaka HARAYAMA JAERI-Review 2004-030 2003 2003 ^4^10 -2004 (2004^12^ 14 2003^4^ 1 B^TOSIBI 8 - JAERI-Review 2004-030 Contents Foreword 1 I CJll *H M* A **V _______________________________________________________ *") • OU ill Ilia 1 j _; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 EPS PPD Report
    Report from the EPS Plasma Physics Division Board, Summer 2019 Board meetings The Board met twice in 2018, on 1st July in Prague (CZ) and on 13th December at Culham (UK). Operation of the Division Richard Dendy (Culham Centre for Fusion Energy and Warwick University, UK) continues as Chair 2016-2020 of the Division, and Kristel Crombé (ERM/KMS and Ghent University, Belgium) continues as Secretary. The Board members leading the arrangements for the competitions for the 2018 EPS-PPD Prizes were: Alfvén, John Kirk (Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Germany); Innovation, Holger Kersten (Kiel University, Germany) and Eva Kovačević (Orléans University, France); PhD Research Award, Carlos Silva (Instituto Superior Técnico, Portugal). Further information is available at http://plasma.ciemat.es/eps/board/. Prague EPS Plasma Physics Conference 2018 (https://eps2018.eli-beams.eu/en/) The successful 45th annual EPS Plasma Physics Conference took place at the Žofín Palace in Prague from 2nd to 6th July 2018, hosted by a consortium of Czech plasma research organisations. The Local Organising Committee was ably chaired by Stefan Weber (ELI-Beamlines), who is also an EPS-PPD Board member. The Programme Committee was ably chaired by Stefano Coda (CH) and comprised: •MCF: M. Mantsinen (ES – sub-chair), T. Eich (DE), G. Ericsson (SE), L. Frassinetti (SE), G. Huijsmans (ITER), R. König (DE), J. Mailloux (UK), P. Piovesan (IT), R. Zagorski (PL) •BPIF: C. Michaut (FR – sub-chair), O. Klimo (CZ), M. Nakatsutsumi (XFEL), A. Ravasio (FR), S. Kar (UK), R. Scott (UK) •BSAP: G. Lapenta (BE – sub-chair), M.E. Dieckmann (SE), E.
    [Show full text]
  • Nd Lu Caf2 for High-Energy Lasers Simone Normani
    Nd Lu CaF2 for high-energy lasers Simone Normani To cite this version: Simone Normani. Nd Lu CaF2 for high-energy lasers. Physics [physics]. Normandie Université, 2017. English. NNT : 2017NORMC230. tel-01689866 HAL Id: tel-01689866 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01689866 Submitted on 22 Jan 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THESE Pour obtenir le diplôme de doctorat Physique Préparée au sein de l’Université de Caen Normandie Nd:Lu:CaF2 for High-Energy Lasers Étude de Cristaux de CaF2:Nd:Lu pour Lasers de Haute Énergie Présentée et soutenue par Simone NORMANI Thèse soutenue publiquement le 19 octobre 2017 devant le jury composé de M. Patrice CAMY Professeur, Université de Caen Normandie Directeur de thèse M. Alain BRAUD MCF HDR, Université de Caen Normandie Codirecteur de thèse M. Jean-Luc ADAM Directeur de Recherche, CNRS Rapporteur Mme. Patricia SEGONDS Professeur, Université de Grenoble Rapporteur M. Jean-Paul GOOSSENS Ingénieur, CEA Examinateur M. Maurizio FERRARI Directeur de Recherche, CNR-IFN Examinateur Thèse dirigée par Patrice CAMY et Alain BRAUD, laboratoire CIMAP Université de Caen Normandie Nd:Lu:CaF2 for High-Energy Lasers Thesis for the Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Topical Review: Relativistic Laser-Plasma Interactions
    INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D: APPLIED PHYSICS J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 (2003) R151–R165 PII: S0022-3727(03)26928-X TOPICAL REVIEW Relativistic laser–plasma interactions Donald Umstadter Center for Ultrafast Optical Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA E-mail: [email protected] Received 19 November 2002 Published 2 April 2003 Online at stacks.iop.org/JPhysD/36/R151 Abstract By focusing petawatt peak power laser light to intensities up to 1021 Wcm−2, highly relativistic plasmas can now be studied. The force exerted by light pulses with this extreme intensity has been used to accelerate beams of electrons and protons to energies of a million volts in distances of only microns. This acceleration gradient is a thousand times greater than in radio-frequency-based accelerators. Such novel compact laser-based radiation sources have been demonstrated to have parameters that are useful for research in medicine, physics and engineering. They might also someday be used to ignite controlled thermonuclear fusion. Ultrashort pulse duration particles and x-rays that are produced can resolve chemical, biological or physical reactions on ultrafast (femtosecond) timescales and on atomic spatial scales. These energetic beams have produced an array of nuclear reactions, resulting in neutrons, positrons and radioactive isotopes. As laser intensities increase further and laser-accelerated protons become relativistic, exotic plasmas, such as dense electron–positron plasmas, which are of astrophysical interest, can be created in the laboratory. This paper reviews many of the recent advances in relativistic laser–plasma interactions. 1. Introduction in this regime on the light intensity, resulting in nonlinear effects analogous to those studied with conventional nonlinear Ever since lasers were invented, their peak power and focus optics—self-focusing, self-modulation, harmonic generation, ability have steadily increased.
    [Show full text]
  • Proton Beams Generated by Ultrashort-Pulse Lasers Will Help
    S&TR December 2003 Proton-Beam Experiments 11 Proton beams ROTONS, the positively charged, Psubatomic particles discovered by Lord Rutherford nearly 100 years ago, are still surprising scientists. Lawrence generated by Livermore researchers are discovering that proton beams created by powerful, ultrashort pulses of laser light can be used to create and even diagnose plasmas, the ultrashort-pulse superhot state of matter that exists in the cores of stars and in detonating nuclear weapons. The proton-beam experiments promise new techniques for maintaining lasers will help the nationʼs nuclear arsenal and for better understanding how stars function. The proton beams used in the Laboratoryʼs experiments are produced advance our by pulses of laser light lasting only about 100 femtoseconds (a femtosecond is 10–15 seconds, or one-quadrillionth of a second) and having a brightness, or understanding of irradiance, up to 5 × 1020 watts per square centimeter. When such fleeting pulses are focused onto thin foil targets, as many as 100 billion protons are emitted, with plasmas. energies up to 25 megaelectronvolts. The protons come from a spot on the foil about 200 micrometers in diameter, and the beamʼs duration is a few times longer than the laser pulse. The highest-energy protons diverge 1 to 2 degrees from the perpendicular, while the lowest-energy protons form a cone about 20 degrees from perpendicular. Funded by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program, the Livermore experiments are led by physicists Pravesh Patel and Andrew Mackinnon. Patel, who works in the Laboratoryʼs Physics and Advanced Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 12 Proton-Beam Experiments S&TR December 2003 Technologies Directorate, is researching per gram) that exist in stars.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vulcan 10 PW Project 7
    LASER SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT I Vulcan The Vulcan 10 PW project 7 Contact [email protected] C. Hernandez-Gomez, S. P. Blake, O. Chekhlov, R. J. Clarke, A. M. Dunne, M. Galimberti, S. Hancock, P. Holligan, A. Lyachev, P. Matousek, I. O. Musgrave, D. Neely, P. A. Norreys, I. Ross, Y. Tang, T. B. Winstone, B. E. Wyborn and J. Collier Central Laser Facility, STFC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, HSIC, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0QX, UK Introduction This projects aim is to upgrade the Vulcan high power laser located at the Central Laser Facility (CLF), to beyond the 10 PW power level (1016 W) and provide focused intensities of greater than 1023 Wcm-2 to its international user community [1]. The project was divided in two phases. Phase 1 of 2 year duration, started in December 2006. A proposal for phase 2 has been submitted and reviewed. The start date of phase 2 is still under discussions. We report here on the overall progress made during the first phase. There were essentially three key areas to address as part of phase 1: • A novel “front end” system has been developed for Figure 1. Area photograph of the 10 PW Front End. the overall project and its performance has been verified with respect to key indicators such as wavelength, energy, bandwidth, pulselength, develop this high (150 nm) bandwidth version and the contrast etc. overall design is now based on this approach. • There has been a significant reduction in the risk associated with several key technical elements of the The 910 nm seed currently generated with the chirped project, particularly the large aperture diffraction scheme has a bandwidth of 165 nm and energy of gratings and laser amplifiers Several outstanding 40 µJ per pulse.
    [Show full text]