DOCSLIB.ORG

Tanks at the Battle of Flers-Courcelette, September 1916

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tanks at the Battle of Flers-Courcelette, September 1916 “A useful accessory to the infantry, but nothing more” Tanks at the Battle of Flers-Courcelette, September 1916 Andrew McEwen he Battle of Flers-Courcelette Fuller was similarly unkind about the Tstands out in the broader memory Abstract: The Battle of Flers- tanks’ initial performance. In his Tanks of the First World War due to one Courcelette is chiefly remembered in the Great War, Fuller wrote that the as the combat introduction of principal factor: the debut of the tanks. The prevailing historiography 15 September attack was “from the tank. The battle commenced on 15 maligns their performance as a point of view of tank operations, not September 1916 as a renewed attempt lacklustre debut of a weapon which a great success.”3 He, too, argued that by the general officer commanding held so much promise for offensive the silver lining in the tanks’ poor (GOC) the British Expeditionary warfare. However, unit war diaries showing at Flers-Courcelette was that and individual accounts of the battle Force (BEF) General Douglas Haig suggest that the tank assaults of 15 the battle served as a field test to hone to break through German lines on September 1916 were far from total tank tactics and design for future the Somme front. Flers-Courcelette failures. This paper thus re-examines deployment.4 One of the harshest shares many familiar attributes the role of tanks in the battle from verdicts on the tanks’ debut comes with other Great War engagements: the perspective of Canadian, British from the Canadian official history. and New Zealand infantry. It finds troops advancing across a shell- that, rather than disappointing Allied It commented that “on the whole… blasted landscape towards thick combatants, the tanks largely lived the armour in its initial action failed German defensive lines to capture up to their intended role of infantry to carry out the tasks assigned to it.” a few square kilometres of barren support. It acknowledged, however, that the territory at the cost of thousands “All Arms” co-ordination of tanks, of lives. The successful assault on September attack in Martin Gilbert’s artillery, infantry and aircraft was not Courcelette by the 2nd Canadian The Battle of the Somme (2006) is entitled yet familiar to BEF commanders.5 Division is typically regarded as “The arrival of the tanks: ‘We are An examination of the battle a victory in Canadian memory of feeling top dogs.’” Similarly, Robin from the infantry’s perspective the war. In contrast, British forces Prior and Trevor Wilson’s The Somme suggests a more nuanced outcome. attacking to the east did not achieve (2005) discusses Flers-Courcelette Despite the high hopes of General their intended breakthrough, and in a chapter entitled “Lumbering Haig and others for their effect on the the battle is viewed in the UK as Tanks: The Battle of 15 September.” battlefield, tanks were not expected a minor advance.1 The tanks’ first Such works are in agreement about to be decisive strategic weapons in combat deployment ultimately two principal conclusions: the attack their early operations. Rather, they overshadowed the hard infantry was not a stirring success, but it were intended to serve as tactical fighting of 15 September in the did showcase the potential for the accessories to the infantry assault. broader memory of the Great War. tank as an offensive weapon. The Infantry units were instructed prior Nearly all of the works that British official history discusses the to 15 September that tanks would discuss the Battle of Flers-Courcelette many shortcomings of the tank on be valuable in surmounting enemy highlight the debut of the tank as 15 September but concedes that the machine gun posts and strongpoints, the central feature of the battle. battle was a “valuable tryout” for the but were in no way to be depended For example, the chapter on the 15 possibilities of tank assaults.2 J.F.C. upon for the advance.6 Flers- © Canadian Military History, Volume 20, Number 4, Autumn 2011, pp.7-22. 7 Courcelette was not the harbinger of tank performance was often a massive joint offensive along the of fast, offensive armoured thrusts, narrowly linked to the fate of the foot inter-army boundary in the Picardy but of tactical support for infantry soldiers – low casualties counting as region in May-June.8 These plans attacks. success, and high casualties as failure. were disrupted by the German The Canadian Corps and British Inconsistencies and biases of both the drive towards Verdun in late XV Corps witnessed the greatest war diaries and personal accounts February which aimed to inflict range of tank performance at Flers- may be identified and balanced by such horrendous losses that the Courcelette and will serve as the reference to more broadly based French would be forced to sue for focal point of analysis for this paper. secondary sources, such as official peace and thereby isolate the BEF.9 Out of five corps at the battle, histories and analytical studies. Verdun descended into a savage these two experienced the most Although at Flers-Courcelette battle of attrition. The French suffered success with tanks and feature the most of the tanks suffered mechanical an estimated 115,000 casualties by best-documented analysis of tank breakdown or battle damage and May.10 operations on 15 September. failed to influence events, some tanks Desperate to alleviate the strain As tanks were designed from rendered valuable assistance to the on Verdun, French commander-in- the outset to support infantry attacks infantry in surmounting German chief General Joseph Joffre pressured across no-man’s-land, the yardstick strongpoints. Both eventualities were the British to continue with the for tank success should be based anticipated and prepared for by the planned offensive in Picardy, north upon how the infantry fared.7 Much attacking infantry units. This paper of the Somme River. Haig protested of the primary analysis for this paper will show that the tanks largely lived that his forces would not be ready will therefore rest upon infantry up to their intended tactical support for a major assault until 15 August. battalion war diaries which contain role at Flers-Courcelette. This was unacceptable to Joffre intelligence and after-action reports and he persuaded Haig to commit and offer candid examinations of Strategic Context to a 1 July start date.11 The carnage tank performance. A number of at Verdun meant that the French infantrymen from Flers-Courcelette, s the Great War entered its third contribution to the Somme offensive moreover, left eyewitness accounts Ayear in January 1916 both the would necessarily be decreased, but of the tanks’ performance, which Entente and Central Powers were Haig still maintained hopes for a supplement the war diaries with intent on smashing through enemy breakthrough on the Western Front. a human dimension of combat. lines and ending the stalemate on The British attack went in as These documents must be used with the Western Front. The British and scheduled in the morning of 1 July caution. An infantry unit’s evaluation French high commands agreed to 1916 and was met with horrific The battle of Flers-Courcelette saw the first use of tanks in battle. C.4 (Chablis), a Mark I (female) tank, assigned to support the 6th Canadian Infantry Brigade, was disabled early in the battle by a shell which disabled its track (see the damage at the rear of the tank). Canadian War Museum 19920085-460 Canadian War 8 Canadian War Museum 19920085-469 Canadian War Here, C.5 (Crème de Menthe), a Mark I tank traverses the Courcelette battlefield, September 1916. C.5 was a male variant armed with two naval 6-pounder guns and four Vickers machine guns. The female variant replaced the 6-pounders with two additional Vickers machine guns. The two-wheeled trailer pulled behind the tank was a steering tail used to help control the direction of the vehicle. slaughter. The combination of deep the east to Combles in the southwest.14 attack was scheduled to begin on 15 German entrenchments and dense This stretch of the German line September. barbed wire that survived the long represented their “Third Position,” British artillery bombardment, a stout network of trenches and The Tanks coupled with lack of surprise meant dugouts that were begun in February that the defenders were well- 1916. Haig hoped that breaking aig used every means at prepared. Over 19,000 British and through this position would finally Hhis disposal to increase the Empire soldiers were killed and some crack the German lines.15 possibility of success for this second 38,000 wounded on the first day of The primary drive of the major effort of the Somme offensive. the attack alone.12 Undeterred by the offensive was to be undertaken The centerpiece of the 15 September scale of the losses, Haig continued by General Sir Henry Rawlinson’s attack was to be roughly 50 rhombus- to push. By late August, roughly Fourth Army, which was tasked with shaped Mark I tanks. By the summer eight square kilometres of German- breaking through three primary lines of 1916 several companies of tanks held territory were captured at a of German defences and capturing were training in Great Britain under cost of 100,000 British casualties.13 the villages of Martinpuich, Flers and a shroud of secrecy. There were German strongholds such as those Gueudecourt on the first day. The two principal variants of the Mark at Thiepval and High Wood, and Canadian Corps of the neighbouring I: the male and female. Males were the Quadrilateral trench network Reserve Army would support this armed with four machine guns continued to elude capture even after drive by attacking Courcelette.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Your Virtual Visit - 63 to the Australian Army Museum of Western Australia
    YOUR VIRTUAL VISIT - 63 TO THE AUSTRALIAN ARMY MUSEUM OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Throughout 2021, the Virtual Visit series will be continuing to present interesting features from the collection and their background stories. The Australian Army Museum of Western Australia is now open four days per week, Wednesday through Friday plus Sunday. Current COVID19 protocols including contact tracing will apply. National Memories of the Somme Beaumont Hamel, Delville Wood, Helen’s Tower, Thiepval An earlier Virtual Visit (VV61) focussed on the Australian remembrance of the Somme battles of July – November 1916. Other countries within the British Empire suffered similar trauma as national casualties mounted. They too chose to commemorate their sacrifice through evocative national memorials on the Somme battlefield. Newfoundland Regiment - Beaumont Hamel During the First World War, Newfoundland was a largely rural Dominion of the British Empire with a population of 240,000 people, and not yet part of Canada. In August 1914, Newfoundland recruited a battalion for service with the British Army. In a situation reminiscent of the khaki shortage facing the first WA Contingent to the Boer War, recruits in the Regiment were nicknamed the "Blue Puttees" due to the unusual colour of the puttees, chosen to give the Newfoundland Regiment a unique look and due to the unavailability of woollen khakis on the island. On 20 September 1915, the Regiment landed at Suvla Bay on the Gallipoli peninsula. At that stage of the campaign, the Newfoundland Regiment faced snipers, artillery fire and severe cold, as well as the trench warfare hazards of cholera, dysentery, typhus, gangrene and trench foot.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WESTERN FRONT World War
    INTRODUCTORY NOTES movement in their efforts to win. Also there is the opportunity to examine other aspects of life on the By 1907 Europe was divided into two armed camps Western Front which affected the life of the ordinary that involved all the major European powers, the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente. While the alliances soldier, such as living conditions, food, medical problems, army routine, discipline and humour. were meant to increase the security of each country, instead they ensured that a war that involved any of these powers would probably involve all of them. WAR PLANS Between the Anglo-French Cordiale of 1904 and the outbreak of war in 1914, there were a number of There had not been major war in Europe since 1870. Teacher's Notes crises in Morocco and the Balkans, any of which Much had changed since then. Population growth meant could have sparked a war. more men were available to be conscripted, industrial advancements meant armies could be equipped with It was the assassination of the Austrian heir to the more devastating weapons, railways meant armies could throne, the Archduke Franz Ferdinand on June 28, be more easily moved and supplied. Every army had a 1914, that finally ignited the European powder keg. general staff, whose job it was to ensure their nations THE WESTERN Following the declaration of war on Serbia by Austria- army was properly equipped and organised for war and to Hungary on July 28, 1914, the Russian Government prepare plans to cover the most likely scenario. ordered its army to mobilise.
    [Show full text]
  • Oce20801 WW1 Battle of the Somme Fact Sheet A4.Qxp
    LOCAL STUDIES CENTRE FACT SHEET NUMBER 27 Battle of the Somme The Battle of the Somme, also known as the Somme Offensive, was fought by the armies of the British and French Empires against the German Empire. It occurred between 1 July 1916 and November 1916 in France and was one of the largest and bloodiest battles of the First World War in which more than 1,000,000 men were wounded or killed. By the end of the first day, 20,000 men had been killed and another 40,000 injured. The first British tank to be used in warfare entered the battlefields of the Somme in September 1916. When the Battle of the Somme ended in November 1916 the Allies had managed to advance only five - seven miles in four months at the cost of over 420,000 British casualties, 195,000 French and 650,000 Germans. Over 500 Sunderland born soldiers were killed throughout this duration, over 170 Wearside soldiers on the first day of the battle alone. There are over 250 military cemeteries and memorials on the Somme battlefields for the many thousands of casualties who fell during this offensive. Pozieres British Cemetery 1914 - 1918 Sunderland and the Somme Sunderland affiliated units deployed in the Battle of the Somme included Durham Light Infantry (7th and 20th), 160th Brigade Royal Field Artillery and Northumberland Hussars to name but a few. These units were recruited in Sunderland and the Territorial Force units were based at the Drill Hall, which was situated near Green Terrace and the Empire Theatre in Durham Light Infantry 20th Division Sunderland city centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Tour Sheets Final04-05
    Great War Battlefields Study Tour Briefing Notes & Activity Sheets Students Name briefing notes one Introduction The First World War or Great War was a truly terrible conflict. Ignored for many years by schools, the advent of the National Curriculum and the GCSE system reignited interest in the period. Now, thousands of pupils across the United Kingdom study the 1914-18 era and many pupils visit the battlefield sites in Belgium and France. Redevelopment and urban spread are slowly covering up these historic sites. The Mons battlefields disappeared many years ago, very little remains on the Ypres Salient and now even the Somme sites are under the threat of redevelopment. In 25 years time it is difficult to predict how much of what you see over the next few days will remain. The consequences of the Great War are still being felt today, in particular in such trouble spots as the Middle East, Northern Ireland and Bosnia.Many commentators in 1919 believed that the so-called war to end all wars was nothing of the sort and would inevitably lead to another conflict. So it did, in 1939. You will see the impact the war had on a local and personal level. Communities such as Grimsby, Hull, Accrington, Barnsley and Bradford felt the impact of war particularly sharply as their Pals or Chums Battalions were cut to pieces in minutes during the Battle of the Somme. We will be focusing on the impact on an even smaller community, our school. We will do this not so as to glorify war or the part oldmillhillians played in it but so as to use these men’s experiences to connect with events on the Western Front.
    [Show full text]
  • Rancourt-Bouchavesnes-Bergen
    Association « Paysages et Sites de mémoire de la Grande Guerre » SECTEUR L - Rancourt-Bouchavesnes-Bergen Description générale du secteur mémoriel Le secteur mémoriel de Rancourt s’inscrit sur le plateau du Vermandois, au nord-est de la vallée de la Somme. Constitué d’un socle de craie, il est recouvert d’une épaisse couche de limon et est ciselé de quelques vallées sèches. Le secteur mémoriel se situe en hauteur, en marge du village de Rancourt, au sud et au sud-ouest de la commune. Il domine Bouchavesnes-Bergen au nord et s'étend sur le territoire communal des deux villages. Il s'intègre dans un environnement rural et agraire d’openfield préservé, garantissant une bonne co-visibilité entre chaque site et soulignant leur alignement. Si le cimetière allemand et la nécropole française sont dotés de grands arbres, quelques bois ponctuent l’espace au-delà du périmètre de la zone tampon proposée. Le secteur mémoriel présente une triple symbolique : - c'est le lieu qui incarne la participation française à la bataille de la Somme. La situation topographique du site SE 06 a contribué à en faire une position de défense naturelle des Allemands pendant la bataille de la Somme en 1916, que les Français ont conquise en subissant au minimum 190 000 pertes (morts, blessés et disparus) sur les quatre mois et demi que dure la bataille. La nécropole nationale française et la Chapelle du Souvenir Français ont contribué, dès leur édification, à faire perdurer la mémoire du lieu, des hommes qui y ont participé et des événements qui s'y sont tenus ; - la proximité géographique et la co-visibilité entre les sites attachés à chacune des trois grandes nations combattantes (Allemagne, France et Royaume-Uni) en font un paysage funéraire fort et international.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of British Tactical and Operational Tank Doctrine and Training in the First World War
    The evolution of British tactical and operational tank doctrine and training in the First World War PHILIP RICHARD VENTHAM TD BA (Hons.) MA. Thesis submitted for the award of the degree of Master of Philosophy by the University of Wolverhampton October 2016 ©Copyright P R Ventham 1 ABSTRACT Tanks were first used in action in September 1916. There had been no previous combat experience on which to base tactical and operational doctrine for the employment of this novel weapon of war. Training of crews and commanders was hampered by lack of vehicles and weapons. Time was short in which to train novice crews. Training facilities were limited. Despite mechanical limitations of the early machines and their vulnerability to adverse ground conditions, the tanks achieved moderate success in their initial actions. Advocates of the tanks, such as Fuller and Elles, worked hard to convince the sceptical of the value of the tank. Two years later, tanks had gained the support of most senior commanders. Doctrine, based on practical combat experience, had evolved both within the Tank Corps and at GHQ and higher command. Despite dramatic improvements in the design, functionality and reliability of the later marks of heavy and medium tanks, they still remained slow and vulnerable to ground conditions and enemy counter-measures. Competing demands for materiel meant there were never enough tanks to replace casualties and meet the demands of formation commanders. This thesis will argue that the somewhat patchy performance of the armoured vehicles in the final months of the war was less a product of poor doctrinal guidance and inadequate training than of an insufficiency of tanks and the difficulties of providing enough tanks in the right locations at the right time to meet the requirements of the manoeuvre battles of the ‘Hundred Days’.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Army, Vimy Ridge and the Elastic Defence in Depth in 1917
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 18, ISSUE 2 Studies “Lessons learned” in WWI: The German Army, Vimy Ridge and the Elastic Defence in Depth in 1917 Christian Stachelbeck The Battle of Arras in the spring of 1917 marked the beginning of the major allied offensives on the western front. The attack by the British 1st Army (Horne) and 3rd Army (Allenby) was intended to divert attention from the French main offensive under General Robert Nivelle at the Chemin des Dames (Nivelle Offensive). 1 The French commander-in-chief wanted to force the decisive breakthrough in the west. Between 9 and 12 April, the British had succeeded in penetrating the front across a width of 18 kilometres and advancing around six kilometres, while the Canadian corps (Byng), deployed for the first time in closed formation, seized the ridge near Vimy, which had been fiercely contested since late 1914.2 The success was paid for with the bloody loss of 1 On the German side, the battles at Arras between 2 April and 20 May 1917 were officially referred to as Schlacht bei Arras (Battle of Arras). In Canada, the term Battle of Vimy Ridge is commonly used for the initial phase of the battle. The seizure of Vimy ridge was a central objective of the offensive and was intended to secure the protection of the northern flank of the 3rd Army. 2 For detailed information on this, see: Jack Sheldon, The German Army on Vimy Ridge 1914-1917 (Barnsley: Pen&Sword Military, 2008), p. 8. Sheldon's book, however, is basically a largely indiscriminate succession of extensive quotes from regimental histories, diaries and force files from the Bavarian War Archive (Kriegsarchiv) in Munich.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaumont-Hamel One Hundred Years Later in Most of Our Country, July 1St 68 Were There to Answer the Roll Call
    Veterans’Veterans’ WeekWeek SSpecialpecial EditionEdition - NovemberNovember 55 toto 11, 11, 2016 2016 Beaumont-Hamel one hundred years later In most of our country, July 1st 68 were there to answer the roll call. is simply known as Canada Day. It was a blow that touched almost In Newfoundland and Labrador, every community in Newfoundland. however, it has an additional and A century later the people of the much more sombre meaning. There, province still mark it with Memorial it is also known as Memorial Day—a Day. time to remember those who have served and sacrificed in uniform. The regiment would rebuild after this tragedy and it would later earn the On this day in 1916 near the French designation “Royal Newfoundland village of Beaumont-Hamel, some Regiment” for its members’ brave 800 soldiers from the Newfoundland actions during the First World Regiment went into action on the War. Today, the now-peaceful opening day of the Battle of the Beaumont-Hamel Newfoundland Somme. The brave men advanced Memorial overlooks the old into a thick hail of enemy fire, battlefield and commemorates the instinctively tucking their chins Newfoundlanders who served in the down as if they were walking through conflict, particularly those who have a snowstorm. In less than half an no known grave. Special events were hour of fighting, the regiment would held in Canada and France to mark Affairs Canada Veterans Photo: th be torn apart. The next morning, only the 100 anniversary in July 2016. Caribou monument at the Beaumont-Hamel Newfoundland Memorial. Force C in The Gulf War not forgotten Against all Hong Kong Our service members played a variety of roles, from crewing odds three Canadian warships with the Coalition fleet, to flying CF-18 jet fighters in attack missions, to Photo: Department of National Department of National Photo: Defence ISC91-5253 operating a military hospital, and at Canadian Armed Forces CF-18 readying more.
    [Show full text]
  • The Durham Light Infantry and the Somme 1916
    The Durham Light Infantry and The Somme 1916 by John Bilcliffe edited and amended in 2016 by Peter Nelson and Steve Shannon Part 4 The Casualties. Killed in Action, Died of Wounds and Died of Disease. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License You can download this work and share it with others as long as it is credited, but you can’t change it in any way or use it commercially © John Bilcliffe. Email [email protected] Part 4 Contents. 4.1: Analysis of casualties sustained by The Durham Light Infantry on the Somme in 1916. 4.2: Officers who were killed or died of wounds on the Somme 1916. 4.3: DLI Somme casualties by Battalion. Note: The drawing on the front page of British infantrymen attacking towards La Boisselle on 1 July 1916 is from Reverend James Birch's war diary. DCRO: D/DLI 7/63/2, p.149. About the Cemetery Codes used in Part 4 The author researched and wrote this book in the 1990s. It was designed to be published in print although, sadly, this was not achieved during his lifetime. Throughout the text, John Bilcliffe used a set of alpha-numeric codes to abbreviate cemetery names. In Part 4 each soldier’s name is followed by a Cemetery Code and, where known, the Grave Reference, as identified by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission. Here are two examples of the codes and what they represent: T2 Thiepval Memorial A5 VII.B.22 Adanac Military Cemetery, Miraumont: Section VII, Row B, Grave no.
    [Show full text]
  • Midlothian Roll of Honour 1914 - 1918
    Midlothian Roll of Honour 1914 - 1918 Regiments G to Q The Midlothian Roll of Honour commemorates the men and women of Midlothian who gave their lives in the First World War 1914-1918. It records details of every casualty on First World War memorials in the Midlothian area. The document firstly contains a table listing the name, regiment and birthplace of each casualty. Below this table is the Roll of Honour (ordered by Regiment), containing greater detail (some with photographs) about each casualty. Name on memorial Regiment Place of birth 1 Sinclair Aitken Gordon Highlanders Newbattle 2 William Baigrie Gordon Highlanders Dalkeith 3 William Barclay Gordon Highlanders Kettle Parish 4 Frank Symons Bussel Beedle Gordon Highlanders Stornoway 5 George Brown Gordon Highlanders Lasswade 6 Andrew Cameron Gordon Highlanders Edinburgh 7 Robert Carson Gordon Highlanders 8 George Crawford Gordon Highlanders 9 John Alexander Downie Gordon Highlanders Edinburgh 10 John Bruce Fortune Gordon Highlanders Arniston Engine 11 John James Foulis Gordon Highlanders Penicuik 12 George Edward Ramsay Gray Gordon Highlanders Dalkeith 13 William Gray Gordon Highlanders Garvald 14 David William Hamilton Gordon Highlanders Musselburgh 15 James Kerr Wilcock Hilton Gordon Highlanders Rosewell 16 Alexander Innes Gordon Highlanders Glasgow 17 David Jack Gordon Highlanders Dalkeith 18 George Jarvie Gordon Highlanders Fort William 19 Frederic Walter Kerr Gordon Highlanders 20 James George Ketchin Gordon Highlanders Milton Cottages, Glencorse 21 Thomas M Knight Gordon Highlanders
    [Show full text]
  • George Frederick Thorpe Was Born on the 3Rd February 1897 at Higher Malsis, Sutton-In-Craven
    T H E F ALLEN OF S U T T O N - I N -C R A V E N G EORGE F REDERICK T H O R P E M ACHINE G U N C O R P S D IED OF W OUNDS 1 1 T H S EPTEMBER 1 9 1 7 BORN IN 1 8 9 7 AT SUTTON - I N - C R A V E N , THE SON OF CLEMISHAW AND MARY THORPE Thorpe Family History • George Frederick Thorpe was born on the 3rd February 1897 at Higher Malsis, Sutton-in-Craven. Certified copy of Birth Certificate for George Frederick Thorpe (source: General Register Office) Higher Malsis, Sutton-in-Craven (source: Andrew Monkhouse postcard collection) • 1901 census shows Clemishaw, his wife Mary (nee Lund) and their 3 children living at Sun Street, Cowling as follows: Name Age Work Birth place Birth year Clemishaw (Head) 38 Gardener (domestic) Hoyland, South Yorkshire 1863 - 1931 Mary Maria (wife) 32 Cowling 1869 - 1907 Amy 8 Bingley 1893 Marion 6 Bingley 1895 George Frederick 4 Sutton-in-Craven 1897 - 1917 • 1911 census shows that Clemishaw had been married to his 2 nd wife Elizabeth for 3 years having been widowed in 1907. It also shows the Thorpe family now living at 193, Keighley Rd, Cowling as follows: Name Age Work Birth place Birth year Clemishaw (Head) 46 Gardener (domestic) Hoyland, South Yorkshire 1865 - 1931 Elizabeth (2nd wife) 38 Housewife Cowling 1873 Amy 18 Weaver Bingley 1893 Marion 16 Weaver Bingley 1895 George Frederick 14 Weaver Sutton-in-Craven 1897 - 1917 Cowling (source: Andrew Monkhouse postcard collection) World War 1 It had been 99 years since Britain was last involved in a major European conflict following the defeat of Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815 August 4 th 1914 Britain declares war on Germany In the autumn of 1914, the young men of the nation came from town and village to take the King's shilling and to offer him their dedicated services in defence of their homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste Des Communes Situées Sur Une Zone À Enjeu Eau Potable
    Liste des communes situées sur une zone à enjeu eau potable Enjeu eau Nom commune Code INSEE potable ABANCOURT 59001 Oui ABBEVILLE 80001 Oui ABLAINCOURT-PRESSOIR 80002 Non ABLAIN-SAINT-NAZAIRE 62001 Oui ABLAINZEVELLE 62002 Non ABSCON 59002 Oui ACHEUX-EN-AMIENOIS 80003 Non ACHEUX-EN-VIMEU 80004 Non ACHEVILLE 62003 Oui ACHICOURT 62004 Oui ACHIET-LE-GRAND 62005 Non ACHIET-LE-PETIT 62006 Non ACQ 62007 Non ACQUIN-WESTBECOURT 62008 Oui ADINFER 62009 Oui AFFRINGUES 62010 Non AGENVILLE 80005 Non AGENVILLERS 80006 Non AGNEZ-LES-DUISANS 62011 Oui AGNIERES 62012 Non AGNY 62013 Oui AIBES 59003 Oui AILLY-LE-HAUT-CLOCHER 80009 Oui AILLY-SUR-NOYE 80010 Non AILLY-SUR-SOMME 80011 Oui AIRAINES 80013 Non AIRE-SUR-LA-LYS 62014 Oui AIRON-NOTRE-DAME 62015 Oui AIRON-SAINT-VAAST 62016 Oui AISONVILLE-ET-BERNOVILLE 02006 Non AIX 59004 Non AIX-EN-ERGNY 62017 Non AIX-EN-ISSART 62018 Non AIX-NOULETTE 62019 Oui AIZECOURT-LE-BAS 80014 Non AIZECOURT-LE-HAUT 80015 Non ALBERT 80016 Non ALEMBON 62020 Oui ALETTE 62021 Non ALINCTHUN 62022 Oui ALLAINES 80017 Non ALLENAY 80018 Non Page 1/59 Liste des communes situées sur une zone à enjeu eau potable Enjeu eau Nom commune Code INSEE potable ALLENNES-LES-MARAIS 59005 Oui ALLERY 80019 Non ALLONVILLE 80020 Non ALLOUAGNE 62023 Oui ALQUINES 62024 Non AMBLETEUSE 62025 Oui AMBRICOURT 62026 Non AMBRINES 62027 Non AMES 62028 Oui AMETTES 62029 Non AMFROIPRET 59006 Non AMIENS 80021 Oui AMPLIER 62030 Oui AMY 60011 Oui ANDAINVILLE 80022 Non ANDECHY 80023 Oui ANDRES 62031 Oui ANGRES 62032 Oui ANHIERS 59007 Non ANICHE 59008 Oui ANNAY 62033
    [Show full text]