DOCSLIB.ORG

Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights in the Courts: Guidance for Judges, Prosecutors and | 3 Lawyers on of EU Directive 2017/541 on Combatting Terrorism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights in the Courts: Guidance for Judges, Prosecutors and | 3 Lawyers on ����������� of EU Directive 2017/541 on Combatting Terrorism Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights in the Courts Guidance for Judges, Prosecutors and Lawyers on of EU Directive 2017/541 on Combatting Terrorism Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights in the Courts: Guidance for Judges, Prosecutors and Lawyers on Application of EU Directive 2017/541 on Combatting Terrorism International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) Human Rights in Practice (HRiP) Nederlands Juristen Comité voor de Mensenrechten (NJCM) Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna di Pisa This Guidance was written by Helen Duffy (HRiP), Róisín Pillay and Karolína Babická (ICJ). November 2020 Counter-terrorism and human rights in the courts: guidance for judges, prosecutors and | 3 lawyers on of EU Directive 2017/541 on combatting terrorism Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 5 II. Applicable international law standards in law and practice ..................................... 7 1. Respect and protection of the human rights of all affected by the criminal process .................................................................................................... 7 2. Investigating and appropriately charging serious violations and crimes under international law ................................................................................ 8 a) States must carry out prompt, thorough, independent investigations of serious acts of violence, by non-State and State actors, and hold to account those responsible ............................................................................................ 8 b) Offences should be appropriately charged, to ensure accountability for serious international crimes .............................................................................. 8 c) Criminal prosecutions on terrorism charges should be used sparingly for .................................................... 9 3. National judiciaries, trial and judicial scrutiny of counter-terrorism measures ................ 9 4. Rights of victims ..................................................................................................10 ..............................11 6. Human rights principles implicated by Directive Offences ...........................................13 6.1 Principle of Legality ...................................................................................... 13 6.2. Restriction on Freedom of Movement, Expression, Association, Assembly, Privacy, Private and Family Life, Right to political participation: Legitimate Aim, Necessity and Proportionality ................................................. 16 6.3 Non-discrimination ....................................................................................... 17 III. Offences under the Directive .................................................................................. 19 1. Terrorist Offences .................................................................................................19 Guidance ........................................................................................................... 19 Commentary ...................................................................................................... 20 2. Directing and participation in a terrorist group .........................................................21 Guidance ........................................................................................................... 22 Commentary ...................................................................................................... 22 3. Public provocation to commit a terrorist offence .......................................................24 Guidance ........................................................................................................... 24 Commentary ...................................................................................................... 24 4. Recruitment for terrorism ......................................................................................27 Guidance ........................................................................................................... 27 Commentary ...................................................................................................... 27 5. Providing and receiving training for terrorism ...........................................................28 Guidance ........................................................................................................... 28 Commentary ...................................................................................................... 29 6. Travelling for the purpose of terrorism ....................................................................30 Guidance ........................................................................................................... 30 Commentary ...................................................................................................... 31 7. Organising or otherwise facilitating travelling for the purpose of terrorism ...................33 Guidance ........................................................................................................... 33 Commentary ...................................................................................................... 33 ................................................................................................34 Guidance ........................................................................................................... 34 Commentary ...................................................................................................... 34 9. Aiding, abetting, inciting and attempting .................................................................35 Guidance ........................................................................................................... 35 IV. The rights of suspects in the criminal process: investigation, prosecution and trial .............................................................................................. 36 1. Investigation, and evidence gathering .....................................................................36 2. Detention in counter-terrorism cases ......................................................................39 3. Fair trial before an independent and impartial court ..................................................41 4. Sentencing ..........................................................................................................43 5. Children in the Criminal Process .............................................................................44 6. Judicial cooperation ..............................................................................................46 Counter-terrorism and human rights in the courts: guidance for judges, prosecutors and | 5 lawyers on of EU Directive 2017/541 on combatting terrorism I. Introduction On 15 March 2017 the European Union (EU) adopted EU Directive 2017/541 on Combatting Terrorism (“the Directive”) with a deadline for transposition into domestic law of September 2018. The Directive aims principally to extend the scope of the application of the criminal law by Member States to terrorism related threats and activity within the EU. In so doing it covers an expansive range of terrorist offences, some previously recognized in international and (most) domestic legal frameworks, and others more innovative. These include crimes related to terrorist as well as ‘related’ offences of ‘public provocation’ of terrorism (recital 10/Article 5), ‘receipt’ of training (article 8), ‘travel for the purpose of terrorism’ (Article 9); aiding and abetting, inciting, attempting or facilitating these offences (Articles 10, 14). The words “terrorist” and “terrorism” here are used only to refer to and replicate their use in the Directive and other laws referred to. They are not necessarily used in a legal sense, terrorism has been proposed by the UN Special Rapporteur on Counter-terrorism and Hu- man Rights Martin Scheinin, in his 2010 report, UN Doc A/HRC/16/51: “Terrorism means an action or attempted action where: (1) The action: (a) Constituted the intentional taking of hostages; or (b) Is intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to one or more members of the general population or segments of it; or (c) Involved lethal or serious physical violence against one or more members of the general population or segments of it; and (2) The action is done or attempted with the intention of: (a) Provoking a state of terror in the general public or a segment of it; or (b) Compelling a Government or international organization to do or abstain from doing something; and enacted for the purpose of complying with international conventions and protocols relating to terrorism or with resolutions of the Security Council relating to terror- The Directive has been criticised for the hasty process of its adoption, its scope and human rights national legislatures, and in turn for prosecutors and investigative judges and the judiciary - in ensuring implementation consistently with human rights and the rule of law. The obligation to ensure implementation consistently with States’ other obligations under inter- national human rights and humanitarian law is enshrined explicitly in the Directive: “this directive has to be implemented in accordance with those rights and principles taking also into account the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the International Covenant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rule of Law Belgium 2017
    Belgium 2017 Total: 77.94 Rule of Law Independence of the Judiciary : 7.83 Independence of judiciary from the executive is a principle developed in Belgium since its state independence in 1830. It was later enshrined by the Constitution. It is highly respected. Since federalization, Constitutional Court has become vital in peaceful resolution of conflicts of interest between the constituent regions or communities and in preventing discrimination. Another judicial body, Council of State, is the highest administrative court in the country, playing an important role in the peaceful settlement of inter-regional or inter-communal disputes. It also deals with legislation affecting human rights, freedom of commerce or other interaction between state bodies and private actors. Interviews with citizens fail to detect anybody who had paid a bribe to a judge, even though 25% think that there exists corruption in the courts. There certainly are sporadic outside influences by public opinion and/or political interference. According to GAN portal, efficiency or even efficacy of courts is but problematic. Judiciary is experiencing shortage of judges, hence backlog and even expiry of some important cases (such as those regarding transnational corruption). Corruption : 7.7 For several years now Belgium has been stagnating in its battle to eliminate corruption. The situation is very good, yet the final steps to make it excellent (such as in comparable Netherlands or Luxembourg) are missing. In the Transparency International`s Corruption Perceptions Index 2016, Belgium was ranked 15 (of 176). Social market economy, long experience in building anti- corruption mechanisms, trained professional administration and a highly developed citizens` awareness have narrowed the ground for - and led to relative rareness of - corruption.
    [Show full text]
  • P U B L I C a T I E S
    P U B L I C A T I E S 1 JANUARI – 31 DECEMBER 2001 2 3 INHOUDSOPGAVE Centrale diensten..............................................................................................................5 Coördinatoren...................................................................................................................8 Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte..................................................................................9 - Emeriti.........................................................................................................................9 - Vakgroepen...............................................................................................................10 Faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid...........................................................................................87 - Vakgroepen...............................................................................................................87 Faculteit Wetenschappen.............................................................................................151 - Vakgroepen.............................................................................................................151 Faculteit Geneeskunde en Gezondheidswetenschappen............................................268 - Vakgroepen.............................................................................................................268 Faculteit Toegepaste Wetenschappen.........................................................................398 - Vakgroepen.............................................................................................................398
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012 CENTRE for LEGAL AID ASSISTANCE & SETTLEMENT (CLAAS)
    1 Annual Report CLAAS 2012 Edited & Complied by: Ms. Katherine Sapna (Deputy National Director/Program Officer) Ms. Rama Rasheed (Assistant Program Officer) Printed by: HOPE TIME PRINTERS 2 CENTRE FOR LEGAL AID ASSISTANCE & SETTLEMENT Annual Report 2012 CENTRE FOR LEGAL AID ASSISTANCE & SETTLEMENT (CLAAS) CLAAS-PAKISTAN 31-Katcha Ferozepur Road, Mozang Chungi Lahore, Pakistan Phone: 0092-42-37581720 Fax: 0092-42-37591571 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.claasfamily.com CLAAS-UK P.O Box 81, Southall Middlesex UB2 5 YQ United Kingdom Tel: 0044-0845 3670567 0044-0208 8611253 E-mail: [email protected] Web-Site: www.claas.org.uk 3 CENTRE FOR LEGAL AID ASSISTANCE & SETTLEMENT CLAAS BOARD in 2012 CLAAS has a Board consisting of 09 members from different walks of life but share similar concerns of the promotion of human rights. CLAAS Board Chairman National Director +Most Rev. Dr. Andrew M. A. Joseph Francis MBE Francis Bishop of Multan Vice Chairman Rt. Rev. Samuel Robert Azraiah Treasurer Younis Rahi Rev. Fr. Inayat Bernard Mr. Amjad Saleem Minhas Mrs. Resha Qadir Mrs. Lesley Azad Mrs. Javaid William Bakhsh Marshall 4 CENTRE FOR LEGAL AID ASSISTANCE & SETTLEMENT List of CLAAS Staff Members in the year 2012 1. Mr. M.A Joseph Francis MBE, National Director 2. Ms. Katherine Sapna, Deputy National Director/Program Officer 3. Mr. Sohail Habel, Finance Manager 4. Ms. Neelam Uzma, Assistant Finance Manager 5. Mr. Joel Samuel, Internal Auditor 6. Mr. Nadeem Anthony Advocate, Research officer (Left in December 2012) 7. Ms. Rama Rasheed, Assistant Program Officer 8. Ms. Huma Lucas, Office Assistant 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Children's Rights Convention Alternative Report by The
    CHILDREN'S RIGHTS CONVENTION ALTERNATIVE REPORT BY THE BELGIAN NGOS September 2001 Kinderrechtencoalitie Vlaanderen vzw Coordination des ONG pour les droits de (Flemish Children’s Rights Coalition) l'enfant (CODE) Limburgstraat 62 (Coordinators of the NGOs for Children’s 9000 Gent Rights) Tel.: (00-32) 9/329.47.84 Rue Marché aux Poulets 30 E-mail : [email protected] 1000 Bruxelles Tel. : (00-32) 2/209.61.68 1 Fax. : (00-32) 2/209.61.60 E-mail : [email protected] 2 Presentation of the NGOs The “Coordination des ONG pour les droits de l’enfant” and the “Kinderrechtencoalitie Vlaanderen” have collaborated closely to produce this alternative to the official Belgian report. 1. La Coordination des ONG pour les droits de l’enfant The “Coordination des ONG pour les droits de l’enfant” (CODE) was founded in 1994 within the framework of the first official Belgian report was an initiative by the Belgian section of the Defence for International Children (DEI). Members today include: Amnesty International, ATD Quart Monde, the Belgian Committee for UNICEF, DEI International, Justice et Paix, la Ligue des droits de l’homme, la Ligue des familles and OMEP. These different associations have a common objective of developing specific actions to promote and defend children's rights in Belgium and in the world. Together, they have the following goals: · To monitor that the Convention concerning Children’s Rights is put in action by Belgium. · To develop a programme for informing, consciousness raising and educating about children’s rights. The “Coordination’s” programme aims to be vigilant and constructive.
    [Show full text]
  • UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights at 10 the Impact of the Ungps on Courts and Judicial Mechanisms
    UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights at 10 The Impact of the UNGPs on Courts and Judicial Mechanisms Disclaimer This report has been prepared in conjunction with the ‘UNGPs 10+’ project organized by the United Nations Working Group on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises to mark ten years since the adoption of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) by the UN Human Rights Council in 2011. This report is designed to provide an overview of the application of the UNGPs by judicial and quasi- judicial mechanisms, and is prepared on the basis of material available generally up to January 2021. It is not intended nor is it to be used as a substitute for legal advice. The information provided to you in this report is not intended to create and does not create an attorney-client relationship with Debevoise or with any lawyer at Debevoise. You may inquire about legal representation by contacting the appropriate person at Debevoise. © Debevoise & Plimpton LLP All rights reserved. 2 Project Lead Authors David W. Rivkin Samantha J. Rowe Deborah Enix-Ross Partner, New York and London Partner, London and Paris Senior Advisor, New York [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Emily Austin Sophia Burton Aymeric Dumoulin Associate, Hong Kong Associate, London Associate, New York [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Nelson Goh Rhianna Hoover Jesse Hope Associate, London Associate, New York Trainee Associate, London [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Merryl Lawry-White Nadya Rouben Katherine Seifert Associate, London Associate, London Associate, Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • They Entered Without Any Rumour. Human Rights in the Belgian Legal
    Goettingen Journal of International Law 4 (2012) 1, 291-311 They Entered without any Rumour. Human Rights in the Belgian Legal Periodicals Sebastiaan Vandenbogaerde Table of Contents A. Introduction ........................................................................................ 292 B. The Rechtskundig Weekblad ............................................................. 295 I. Belgian linguistic history ............................................................... 297 II. Quantitative analysis ...................................................................... 300 1. Autonomous doctrinal contributions .......................................... 300 2. Case law ..................................................................................... 301 C. External: Belgian cases procedural changes ...................................... 302 I. Linguistic issues create a greater attention for Strasbourg ............. 302 II. How a baby changed the focus in the legal periodicals ................. 306 III. The adoption of the 11th and 14th Protocol ............................... 308 IV. A Change of mentality in the Belgian legal world ..................... 310 D. Internal changes: the Editorial Board ................................................. 310 E. Conclusion ......................................................................................... 311 Sebastiaan Vandenbogaerde has a degree in history (2006) and law (2010). Since August 2010 he is researcher in the Department of Legal Theory and History at Ghent University.
    [Show full text]
  • Trafficking in Human Beings in Belgium 2007-2008
    Trafficking in Human Beings in Belgium 2007-2008 Human Rights Without Frontiers International 28 April 2009 Trafficking in Human Beings Index Trafficking in Human Beings .......................................................................................................................1 1.1. The Law of 10 August 2005................................................................................................................2 1.2. The law of 15 September 2006...........................................................................................................3 1.3. Criminal Legislation ..........................................................................................................................4 2. Trafficking in human beings: the implementation of the legal framework...............................................5 2.1. National Action Plan..........................................................................................................................5 2.2. Sectors................................................................................................................................................5 a. Prostitution....................................................................................................................................6 b. Textile ...........................................................................................................................................7 c. Construction..................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Ungp on Business and Human Rights in Belgium
    UNGP ON BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELGIUM. STATE-BASED JUDICIAL MECHANISMS AND STATE-BASED NON- JUDICIAL GRIEVANCE MECHANISMS, WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON THE BARRIERS TO ACCESS TO REMEDY MEASURES. Fido Project MP-OO/FIDO/2016/5 Wouter Vandenhole (Project Director) Liliana Lizarazo Rodríguez (Author) 1 University of Antwerp Faculty of Law Law and Development Research Group 1 The author and the project director wish to thank the Working Group on CSR of the Interdepartmental Commission for Sustainable Development and the members of the Advisory Committee of this project (Koen De Feyter, Stephan Rutten and Luc Van Liedekerke) for all their valuable comments, and acknowledge also further inputs and written comments from Departement Werk en Sociale Economie and Departement Buitenlandse Zaken (Vlaanderen), FOD Werkgelegenheid, Arbeid en Sociaal Overleg/SPF Emploi, Travail et Concertation Sociale, and as well as from Stefanie De Somer (Universiteit Antwerpen). In addition, we thank Myria, the Center for Gender Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE SCENE ........................................................................................ 4 1.1 THE RELEVANCE OF THE RESEARCH PROJECT ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 FRAMEWORK: GUIDELINES ON BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS ............................................................................................... 5 1.3 TRANSNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LITIGATION ON BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A GERMAN WAR PRACTICES
    a GERMAN WAR PRACTICES PART I TREATMENT OF CIVILIANS EDITED BY DANA C. MUNRO PRINCETON UNIVERSITY GEORGE C. SELLERY and AUGUST C. KREY UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN UNIVERSITY OF .MINNESOTA ISSUED BY THE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC INFORMATION THE SECRETARY OF STATE THE SECRETARY OF WAR .THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY GEORGE CREEL EXECUTIVE ORDER. I hereby create a Committee on Public Information, to be composed of the Secretary of State, the Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, and a civilian who shall be charged with the executive direction of the Committee. As civilian Chairman of the Committee I appoint Mr. George Creel. The Secretary of State, the Secretary of War, and the Secretary of the Navy are authorized each to detail an officer or officers to the work of the Committee. WOODROW WILSON. April 14, 1917. INTRODUCTION. For many years leaders in every civilized nation have been trying to make warfare less brutal. The great Germany landmarks in this movement are the Geneva regulations. aSU6 an<^ Hague Conventions. The former made rules as to the care of the sick and wounded and established the Red Cross. At the first meeting at Geneva, in 1864, it was agreed, and until the present war it has been taken for granted, that the wounded, and the doctors and nurses who cared for them, would be safe from all attacks by the enemy. The Hague Conventions, drawn up in 1899 and 1907, made additional rules to soften the usages of war and especially to protect noncombatants and conquered lands. Germany took a prominent part in these meetings and with the other nations solemnly pledged her faith to keep all the rules except one article in the Hague Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/48/8 General Assembly
    United Nations A/HRC/48/8 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 July 2021 English Original: English/French Human Rights Council Forty-eighth session 13 September–1 October 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review* Belgium * The annex is being circulated without formal editing, in the languages of submission only. GE.21-09330 (E) 060821 060821 A/HRC/48/8 Introduction 1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, established in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1, held its thirty-eighth session from 3 to 14 May 2021. The review of Belgium was held at the 5th meeting, on 5 May 2021. The delegation of Belgium was headed by Vice-Première Ministre et Ministre des affaires étrangères, des affaires européennes et du commerce extérieur, et des institutions culturelles fédérales, Sophie Wilmès. At its 10th meeting, held on 7 May 2021, the Working Group adopted the report on Belgium. 2. On 12 January 2021, the Human Rights Council selected the following group of rapporteurs (troika) to facilitate the review of Belgium: Austria, Indonesia and Togo. 3. In accordance with paragraph 15 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 5/1 and paragraph 5 of the annex to Council resolution 16/21, the following documents were issued for the review of Belgium: (a) A national report submitted/written presentation made in accordance with paragraph 15 (a);1 (b) A compilation prepared by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in accordance with paragraph 15 (b);2 (c) A summary prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (c).3 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in Belgium Treaty Body Recommendations
    an excellent tool for the Council to address human rights situations on the ground. We are committed to cooperating with them and will continue to make every effort to respect the integrity and independence of these special procedures. Belgium fully engages with the Universal Periodic Review Belgian human rights priorities mechanism and strives to ensure an effective follow-up to universal periodic review recommendations as accepted at the international level: during its review. We also actively participate in the review of other countries. • Combating impunity and strengthening Belgium will, in accordance with both its internal policies and accountability and the rule of law - Belgium is legislation and its foreign policy, continues to work closely a strong supporter of the International Criminal with civil society and promote the active participation of Court non-governmental organizations in the Human Rights Council. Belgium has been a staunch supporter of the Office of the • Ensuring respect for the physical integrity UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) since its of every person, including progress towards creation and will continue to provide support to the OHCHR universal abolition of the death penalty Human Rights Council in the future. The independence and the impartiality of this Office must be safeguarded, as they are essential conditions to enable the Office to promote and protect human rights. • Enhancing equality and countering Most of our contributions during the past decade were non- discrimination, with particular attention to earmarked. the rights of women, children, and vulnerable BELGIUM The actions of the Belgian cooperation follow a rights persons based approach to development, based on the universality, indivisibility and inalienability of human rights, as well as • Promoting decent work and social protection the principles of participation and inclusivity in decision- 2016-2018 making, non-discrimination and equality, transparence and for all and respect for international labor accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Intercultural Issues in Belgium
    Project Number: 2016-1-FR01-KA201-024133 HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERCULTURAL ISSUES IN BELGIUM Julien Keutgen, Martine Prignon Inforef, Liège (BE) [email protected] Project Number: 2016-1-FR01-KA201-024133 ABSTRACT Inforef proceeded in different ways to involve schools and teachers in “I Have Rights”: large-scale contact to hundreds of school, through our associated partners, articles in magazines, individual contact with teachers, headteachers, associations… While the issues of interculturality and discrimination are priorities in Belgium, Many teachers who cooperate in the project emphasised the lack of interest of many of their colleagues for the topics addressed, which made their participation difficult. 1. INTRODUCTION The main educational system The Belgian education system comes from the 1959 “Pacte scolaire” (Law of the 29th of May 1959). This pact defines several great principles: o Parents’ freedom to choose their children’s education o Free education o End of tensions between school networks The federal authority vouches for the pact, but the organisation of education is decentralised to federated entities, the Communities. There are three Communities based on the three official languages of the country: French, Dutch and German. The school system is more or less the same in the three communities. Education is compulsory from 6 to 18. The curriculum is organised as such: o Kindergarten from 2.5 to 6 years old (optional but recommended) o Primary education from 6 to 12 (six compulsory years). It teaches basic subjects. o Secondary education from 12 to 18 (6 compulsory years). Four pathways are proposed to students: General education (transition education to prepare students for higher education), Technical education (qualifying education to prepare students for professional life of transition education), Vocational education (qualifying education to prepare students for professional life) Artistic education (qualifying education to prepare students for professional life of transition education).
    [Show full text]