DOCSLIB.ORG

Evolution Karina Altman

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evolution Karina Altman 29Dec12 Evolution Karina Altman Outline Evolution Science and Religion Problems with Evolution Gaps in the Fossil Record/Transitional Forms Origin of Genetic Material Science and Natural Laws Proofs of Evolution – Refuted Heredity Biogenetic Law Missing Links Vestigial Organs Evolution in Action 1 29Dec12 Outline Evolution Science and Religion Problems with Evolution Gaps in the Fossil Record/Transitional Forms Origin of Genetic Material Science and Natural Laws Proofs of Evolution – Refuted Heredity Biogenetic Law Missing Links Vestigial Organs Evolution in Action Evolution Evolution has a variety of definitions, ranging from “change” to “the natural process by which all life on earth derived from a single ancestor” Referred to alternatively as a hypothesis, theory, law, or fact Used ambiguously to imply that the processes we can observe in the present “prove” that processes we cannot observe in the past must have happened too 2 29Dec12 Evolution Scientifically, evolution means the change or addition of genetic material between generations, or “descent with modification” These changes are attributed to mutations and natural selection, which are examples of operations science and can be shown to occur Mutations and natural selection are NOT evolution!!! Evolution The other aspect of evolution is the belief that all animals descended from one original ancestor Evolutionists claim this “fact” is established in the fossil record and genetic evidence However, any evidence involving origins science is subject to interpretational bias Remember the difference between operations and origins science 3 29Dec12 Evolution Mutations are often cited as a source of heritable traits from one generation to another While mutations do cause changes in the genome, this process is not capable of changing one kind of animal into another Mutations have either no noticeable effect or cause degeneration Evolution Evolutionists claim that since one can observe natural selection, then descent from a common ancestor must be true However, this assumes that the current processes we observe could cause the origin of completely novel structures This is contrary to the laws of nature 4 29Dec12 Outline Evolution Science and Religion Problems with Evolution Gaps in the Fossil Record/Transitional Forms Origin of Genetic Material Science and Natural Laws Proofs of Evolution – Refuted Heredity Biogenetic Law Missing Links Vestigial Organs Evolution in Action Science and Religion The root meaning of science is “knowledge” Theology once was considered the “queen of sciences” Now, “science” has come to mean a “method of knowing” Remember Operations vs. Origins science Present day observations help us consider possible causes of past events, but they cannot tell us exactly what happened in the past 5 29Dec12 Science and Religion The Bible provides an eyewitness account of Creation Week Evolution is a belief about the past based on anti-biblical assumptions Creation vs. Evolution is not a battle of religion vs. science, but rather a conflict between worldviews We must examine every claimed truth against Scripture and look for faulty logic or false assumptions Outline Evolution Science and Religion Problems with Evolution Gaps in the Fossil Record/Transitional Forms Origin of Genetic Material Science and Natural Laws Proofs of Evolution – Refuted Heredity Biogenetic Law Missing Links Vestigial Organs Evolution in Action 6 29Dec12 Gaps in the Fossil Record The most glaring problem with the idea of common ancestry is the lack of fossil evidence of the millions of transitional forms needed This argument is often dismissed by: Agreeing with the lack of a complete fossil record Problems in identifying what is transitional Gaps in the Fossil Record However, this does not diminish the problem since the blatant changes evolution requires would be expected to provide numerous examples in every layer of the geologic record Instead, most of the geologic record is better explained by the catastrophic processes during Noah’s Flood and the following localized catastrophes Furthermore, the amazing design of most animals make transitional forms impossible 7 29Dec12 Transitional Forms Transitional Forms 8 29Dec12 Transitional Forms Origin of Genetic Material According to evolutionists, all genetic information arose spontaneously, not only with the first living organism, but continuously throughout life history Evolution requires that the information for new structures must have been added to the genome over and over through mutations This is basically a series of miracles! The spontaneous generation of complex information has never been observed 9 29Dec12 Origin of Genetic Material Information can only come from an intelligent source It not only requires bits of data, but also the ability to decode and understand that data Without both the data and the understanding, information is useless Therefore, living systems could not have arisen through genetic mistakes and must have been created to function as complete systems Science and Natural Laws Evolution fails as a framework because it violates several known laws of the universe In order for evolution and abiogenesis to occur, several “miracles” (violations of natural law) would had to have occurred This undermines the very premise of naturalism! 10 29Dec12 Science and Natural Laws CREATION EVOLUTION 1st Law of YES NO Thermodynamics 2nd Law of YES NO Thermodynamics Law of Cause and YES NO Effect Law of Biogenesis YES NO Outline Evolution Science and Religion Problems with Evolution Gaps in the Fossil Record/Transitional Forms Origin of Genetic Material Science and Natural Laws Proofs of Evolution – Refuted Heredity Biogenetic Law Missing Links Vestigial Organs Evolution in Action 11 29Dec12 Heredity Evolution is claimed to occur through inherited alterations of traits via genetic changes Natural selection then acts upon these changes by selecting for those that improve the overall fitness of a species However, these processes are insufficient to give rise to the various kinds of animals found in the fossil record and today Heredity While such changes may cause characteristics to fluctuate, they are not capable of the mass changes evolutionists claim happened since life first appeared Mutations cannot add the information needed for original structures to appear; they are a LOSS of genetic information They do play a part in revealing and controlling the variation within each kind of animals and also in a number of diseases (aspect of the Curse) 12 29Dec12 Heredity Heredity The observed evidence in the present concerning genetic changes supports Genesis, which says that God created all animal kinds and human kind during Creation Week God gave the animal kinds a robust enough genetic foundation to form numerous species and to adapt to changing environments No observed processes can ever cause one kind of animal to transform into another kind 13 29Dec12 What is a Kind? God created a number of animals with much capacity for variation within limits Kinds would today be represented by families or genera Species and breeds have descended from these original kinds A common way to describe kinds is any group of organisms that can interbreed, produce fertile offspring, and do not mate with other species What is a Kind? “And God said, ‘Let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the vault of the sky.’ So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living thing with which the water teems and that moves about in it, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. God blessed them and said, ’Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth.’ And there was evening, and there was morning – the fifth day. And God said, ‘Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: the livestock, the creatures that move along the ground, and the wild animals, each according to its kind.’ And it was so. God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.” Genesis 1:20-25 14 29Dec12 What is a Kind? What is a Kind? 15 29Dec12 What is a Kind? What is a Kind? 16 29Dec12 What is a Kind? What is a Kind? 17 29Dec12 What is a Kind? Biogenetic Law In 1868, a German evolutionist named Ernst Haeckel popularized the idea that an organism’s early embryonic development supposedly retraces its evolutionary history 18 29Dec12 Biogenetic Law Within months of publication, zoologist L. Rutimeyer and comparative embryologist W. His Sr. showed it to be fraudulent Haeckel modified his drawings to make them look more alike and even printed the same woodcut several times to make the embryos look identical Recently, it has been discovered that Haeckel’s embryos bear very little resemblance to the actual embryos Despite Haeckel’s exposure, these pictures are still in textbooks today! Biogenetic Law Evolutionist George Simpson said in 1965, “It is now firmly established that ontogeny does not repeat phylogeny.” Evolutionist Keith Thompson said, “Surely the biogenetic law is dead as a doornail.” However, this is still presented in textbooks as conclusive evidence for evolution!!! Dedicated atheist Carl Sagan, in support of abortion, often references Haeckel’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Silencing Reply to Atheism
    Title: A Silencing Reply to Atheism First Edition: 2018 Published by: Madrasah Arabia Islamia, Azaadville 2 Who is the Monkey? Contents Introduction .............................................................................. 4 Belief of a Divine Being ........................................................ 4 Comments .................................................................................. 7 Previous Titles to This Booklet......................................... 8 A Reasoned and Level-Headed Response to an Atheist ......................................................................................... 9 Additional Notes: ................................................................. 37 The Creed of the Atheists ................................................. 37 What Led to the Success of the Evolutionists? ........ 38 What Proof is there that Muslim Lands were Greatly Advanced? .............................................................. 39 Why do people still deny the existence of a Supreme Being? ................................................................... 40 Scientific Racism .................................................................. 43 Appendix 1 ............................................................................. 44 What is Science? ................................................................... 44 Philosophy of Science Yields Uncertain Knowledge ..................................................................................................... 53 Appendix 2 ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Human Origins the Ape-Ancestry Myth
    Human Origins the ape-ancestry myth David Pratt February 2004 Part 1 of 3 Contents (Part 1) 1. Darwinian claims and controversies 2. Genetic tales: Adam and Eve (Part 2) 3. Suppressed evidence of human antiquity 4. Giants and wildmen (Part3) 5. Anatomy and origins 6. Theosophy: fallen angels, fallen apes 1. Darwinian claims and controversies According to mainstream science, humans are evolved apes who, as a result of random genetic mutations and environmental pressures, happened to acquire the unique power of selfconsciousness. However, the loud publicity and slick propaganda for the ape-ancestry theory cannot alter the fact that the evidence is scanty and contradictory and open to other interpretations. Anthropologist Richard Leakey has said that ‘If someone went to the trouble of collecting together in one room all the fossil remains so far discovered of our ancestors (and their biological relatives) who lived, say, between five and one million years ago, he would need only a couple of large trestle tables on which to spread them out.’1 Most hominid fossils are fragments of jaws and scraps of skulls but, as palaeontologist Stephen J. Gould once said, ‘they serve as a basis for endless speculation and elaborate storytelling’.2 Beliefs, expectations, and prejudices inevitably play a role in the interpretation of fossils, as do personal rivalries and the desire for fame. More than one palaeoanthropologist has become famous overnight by announcing sensational and extravagant claims after finding some fragmentary remains of a creature he or she believes to be related to man’s origin. But such claims have a habit of being undermined or invalidated by further research and discoveries.
    [Show full text]
  • Poetic Connections in Tracy Letts's "Man from Nebraska," "August: Osage County," and "Superior Donuts."
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2011 How to Get from Here to There: Poetic Connections in Tracy Letts's "Man from Nebraska," "August: Osage County," and "Superior Donuts." Deborah Ann Kochman University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Literature Commons, and the Theatre and Performance Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Kochman, Deborah Ann, "How to Get from Here to There: Poetic Connections in Tracy Letts's "Man from Nebraska," "August: Osage County," and "Superior Donuts."" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3187 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. How to Get from Here to There: Poetic Connections in Tracy Letts‘s Man from Nebraska, August: Osage County, and Superior Donuts by Deborah Ann Kochman A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of English College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Sara Munson Deats, Ph.D. Lagretta Lenker, Ph.D. Susan Mooney, Ph.D. Date of approval: November 3, 2011 Five key words: Drama, Narrative, Poetry, Middle-aged men, American Dream Copyright © 2011 Deborah A. Kochman Dedication I dedicate this thesis to my children, Kristina and Michael, in apology for teaching too much narrative and not enough poetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Evolution
    1 One-Evening Compact Books Compact Books For Busy People This Is A Totally Free Resource Offered By The International Apologetics Society (Estd. 1970) IAS offers totally FREE Ebooks from its website at http://www.OnlyFreeBooks.com you can download numerous FREE ebooks from this site. This publication is released in Creative Commons and can freely be used by anyone anywhere under similar conditions. In fact, we encourage you to distribute this work freely for the sake of the gospel of Christ April 2015, September 2018 2 Human Evolution Dr. Johnson C. Philip Dr. Saneeh Cherian Evolution of life is a very old idea, dating at least as far back as the Greek philosophers. However, in modern times it was given a great impetus by Charles Darwin and his theories of origin. Charles Darwin Darwin’s book, Origin of Species, created a great expectation in the evolutionary thinkers in scientific world that now finally human-evolution from monkey- like creatures would finally be demonstrated. This atmosphere of optimism was given further boost by the discovery of numerous monkey and human-like fossils. (Fossils are remains from the past and are very useful for a study of life as it used to be in the past). 3 Names such as Nebraska Man, Java Man, Piltdown Man, Australopithecus, Ramapithecus, Homo Erectus, Neanderthal Man, and Cro Magnon Man became very popular in the evolutionary circle. These are actually names given to the creatures whose fossils were discovered worldwide, mostly by supporters of evolution. These fossil-men were then put together in a certain order to create a chronology of how man evolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Travels of a Darwin Groupie: Cradle of Humankind
    Travels of a Darwin Groupie: Cradle of Humankind Top row, left to right: Mrs. Ples; diorama in the Ditsong Museum; grassland at Sterkfontein. Bottom row, left to right: Assumed migrations in Henry Fairfield Osborne's Man Rises to Parnassus; Sterkfontein guide discussing Robert Broom; Khoisan tapestries at the Wits Origins Centre. Timeline A Selection of Discarded 1731-Johann Jakob Scheuchzer describes what he thinks is a victim of the biblical flood. Hominin Names 1811-Georges Cuvier identifies Scheuchzer's biblical flood victim as a giant salamander. Pithecanthropus erectus, Sinanthropus pekinensis, Pithecanthropus alalus (Ernst 1823-William Buckland finds the Red Lady of Paviland (probably male). Haeckel's Ape Man without Speech), 1856-The first recognized fossil human, a Neanderthal, is discovered near Düsseldorf. Homo stupidus (Haeckel's Cretin Man), 1863-T.H. Huxley publishes Man's Place in Nature. Hesperopithecus haroldcookii (Henry Fairfield Osborn's Nebraska Man), 1871-Charles Darwin publishes The Descent of Man. Eoanthropus dawsoni (Piltdown Man), 1894-Eugène Dubois publishes his monograph of Pithecanthropus erectus (Java Man). Australopithecus Bahrelghazali, Paraustralopithecus aethiopicus, 1912-Arthur Smith Woodward announces the find of Piltdown Man. Zinjanthropus Boisei, Homo antiquus, 1925-Raymond Dart publishes a description of the Taung Child (Australopithecus africanus). Homo kanamensis, Homo capensis, Homo 1925-Tennessee prosecutes schoolteacher John Thomas Scopes for teaching evolution. rhodesiensis, Plesianthropus transvaalensis, Paranthropus crassidens, Meganthropus 1947-Robert Broom and John T. Robinson find Mrs. Ples in Sterkfontein Cave. palaeojavanicus, Homo louisleakeyi, Homo 1959-Mary Leakey finds Nutcracker Man (Zinjanthropus Boisei). helmei, Homo diluvii testis. 1974-Donald Johanson and his team discover Lucy (Australopithecus afarensis). 1974-Kamoya Kimeu discovers a 1.7-million-year-old female Homo erectus skeleton with advanced Vitamin A poisoning, who was likely cared for by another hominin.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing on the Rock: the Inspiration and Authority of Scripture
    Evolution & the Christian Faith Lesson 11: Ape Men; DNA Tenets of Evolution 1. Man (homo) evolved from Primates (pithecus). 2. This evolutionary process has taken at least 5 million years. 3. Fossils prove the numerous stages of this process. 4. This evolutionary process occurred through natural selection (“survival of the fittest”) and through mutations, as Darwin wrote. 5. The various human groups are not necessarily related to each other. 6. The evolutionary process was entirely natural – no supernatural cause or participation. Teachings of the Bible 1. The Triune God created one human couple, and all humans are descended from these “first parents” 2. Any human bones discovered in caves or elsewhere are the remains of people who have lived on earth since the Creation about 6000 – 7000 years ago, and most likely lived after the Flood. 3. There were variations within the human race that have since become extinct (such as Neanderthals). 4. Any primate bones discovered are simply extinct species of apes – nothing more. 5. The entire evolutionary process from primates to humans is an absolute farce - contrary to the Bible, to science, and to common sense. Neanderthals The first Neanderthal remains (a partial skeleton) were discovered near Dusseldorf, Germany, in 1856. The first complete skeleton was discovered in France in 1908. Currently there are over 300 full or partial remains, mostly from Europe and the Middle East. Evolutionists are unable to explain where Neanderthals came from, or what happened to them. Neanderthals – first conception Neanderthals – long-held conception Neanderthals – Modern conception Piltdown Man Step 1 - Discovered in a gravel pit by workers in Piltdown, England – 1908 - Pieces of a skull, a lower jaw with some teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Scientific Evidence of Creation and Intelligent Design Congruent
    Is the ScientificChapter Evidence Two of Creation and IntelligentINTELLIGENT Design congruent DESIGN with Scripture? A scientific evaluation of the top questions in the Creation vs. Evolution debate. 1. Was there a “Big Bang” or was there a “Big god”? Today the known universe appears to contain about one hundred billion galaxies with approximately one hundred billion stars in each galaxy. It is believed that this “cosmos” extends across a diameter of 27.4 billion light years. Our galaxy, the Milky Way, also contains approximately one hundred billion stars and spans out approximately five hundred and eighty quadrillion miles. For centuries scientists believed that the universe itself was constant; the universe had no beginning or no end. But Einstein’s “Theory of Relativity” in 1920 challenged that long held idea indeed. In 1929, astronomer Edwin Hubble, from the Mt. Wilson observatory overlooking Los Angeles, confirmed Einstein’s theoretical predictions with emperical science. Hubble noticed that the entire universe was indeed moving away from us in all directions. Therefore if the universe was rapidly expanding, scientists concluded that if they could rewind cosmic history (like running a motion picture film backwards through a projector) the cosmos would be seen shrinking over time; going all the way back to a time of 15-20 billion years ago when the cosmos was a mere mathematical point in empty space. In April 2006, this naturalistic view was severely challenged when N.A.S.A.’s WMAP satellite, traveling with the best telescopic power in the world, concluded while gazing into the ever expanding cosmos, that at the very beginning (“Big Bang” or “Big God”) the universe expanded from this subatomic particle Billions of Light Years in the first trillionth of a second!i This, “inflation phase” of early cosmological birth defies every known law of physics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australopithecus That Fell out of the Human Evolution Tree
    LUCY: THE AUSTRALOPITHECUS THAT FELL OUT OF THE HUMAN EVOLUTION TREE Daniel A. Biddle, Ph.D. Copyright © 2017 by Genesis Apologetics, Inc. E-mail: [email protected] www.genesisapologetics.com A 501(c)(3) ministry equipping youth pastors, parents, and students with Biblical answers for evolutionary teaching in public schools. LUCY: THE AUSTRALOPITHECUS THAT FELL OUT OF THE HUMAN EVOLUTION TREE by Daniel A. Biddle, Ph.D. Printed in the United States of America ISBN-13: 978-1543174724 ISBN-10: 1543174728 All rights reserved solely by the author. The author guarantees all contents are original and do not infringe upon the legal rights of any other person or work. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without the permission of the author. The views expressed in this book are not necessarily those of the publisher. Unless otherwise indicated, Bible quotations are taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION®. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan. All rights reserved. The “NIV” and “New International Version” trademarks are registered in the United States Patent and Trademark Office by the International Bible Society. Use of either trademark requires the permission of the International Bible Society. Dedication To my wife, Jenny, who supports me in this work. To my children Makaela, Alyssa, Matthew, and Amanda, and to your children and your children’s children for a hundred generations—this book is for all of you. We would like to acknowledge Answers in Genesis (www.answersingenesis.org), the Institute for Creation Research (www.icr.org), and Creation Ministries International (www.creation.com).
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Hominids FAQ In
    Fossil Hominids FAQ Fossil Hominids Copyright © 1996-1999 by Jim Foley [Last Update: July 10, 1999] Permission is given to copy and print these pages for non-profit personal or educational use. These web pages are intended to refute creationist claims that there is no evidence for human evolution. To do this, it is first necessary to summarize the current thinking about human evolution and the fossil evidence supporting it. If you are not interested in creationism, you can read only those pages. If you are only interested in creationism, you can skip to the pages on creationist arguments; they will contain links to the fossils under discussion when necessary. Table of Contents ● Hominid Species (also includes an introduction and a timeline) ● Hominid Fossils (a list of the most important hominid fossils) ● Recent Developments (what's new in paleoanthropology) ● Creationist Arguments ❍ The Australopithecines ❍ Homo habilis ❍ Homo erectus ❍ Java Man ❍ Peking Man ❍ Piltdown Man ❍ Nebraska Man ❍ Orce Man ❍ The Neandertals ❍ Anomalous Fossils ❍ Brain Sizes ❍ Bones of Contention ❍ Semicircular Canals ❍ Overview ● Further Reading ● References ● Illustrations ● Type specimens http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/fossil-hominids.html (1 of 3) [31/8/1999 1:48:39 PM] Fossil Hominids FAQ ● Biographies ● What's New? ● Feedback ● Other Links ● Fiction ● Humor ● Crackpots ● Misquotes ● About these pages This site will be updated on a regular basis. Contact the author ([email protected]) with corrections, criticisms, suggestions for further topics, or to be notified of future versions. The FAQ can be found in the talk.origins archives on the Internet at: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/fossil-hominids.html (Web version) ftp://ftp.ics.uci.edu/pub/origins/fossil-hominids (text version) Thanks to those who have reviewed or made comments on the FAQ, including Randy Skelton, Marc Anderson, Mike Fisk, Tom Scharle, Ralph Holloway, Jim Oliver, Todd Koetje, Debra McKay, Jenny Hutchison, Glen Kuban, Colin Groves, and Alex Duncan.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution's Hoaxes
    Evolution's Hoaxes Nebraska Man: How many skeletons do you think were found of Nebraska Man? 100? 50? 25? 10? How about one complete skeleton? How about half a skeleton? Maybe 1/10 of a skeleton? Hold on, Nebraska man was reconstructed from a single tooth. What is even more amazing—the tooth turned out to be a pig's tooth! How could anyone be so gullible as to believe a man could be reconstructed from a tooth? Yet many people placed their faith in Nebraska man until the hoax was exposed. Java Man: How many skeletons do you think were found of Java Man? 100? 50? 25? 10? How about one complete skeleton? How about half a skeleton? Java Man was reconstructed from a skullcap, thighbone, and 2 molar teeth. Dr. Eugene DuBois found the thighbone 50 feet away from the skullcap, but assumed it was the same individual. After discovering human skulls at the same level near his Java Man discovery, he hid the skulls under the floorboards of his bedroom for 26 years. Before his death DuBois confessed that he had not found the missing link and admitted that Java Man was probably a giant gibbon. Piltdown Man: In 1912 Charles Dawson reconstructed Piltdown Man out of a jaw, 2 molar teeth, and a piece of skull. In 1953 the hoax was exposed. The jawbone turned out to be that of a modern orangutan, the teeth had been filed down and the bones artificially colored to deceive the public. For over 40 years evolutionists promoted his findings as fact.
    [Show full text]
  • Logic and the Interpretation of Fossils
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 2 Print Reference: Volume 2:I, Pages 7-14 Article 6 1990 Logic and The Interpretation of Fossils Russell T. Arndts Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Arndts, Russell T. (1990) "Logic and The Interpretation of Fossils," The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: Vol. 2 , Article 6. Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol2/iss1/6 LOGIC AND THE INTERPRETATION OF FOSSILS RUSSELL T. ARMOTS ABSTRACT Prehistorical events as proposed by evolutionists are difficult to determine by the study of modern plants and animal s. Ideally these events should be determined by the analysis of a record left at the time they happened; thus, evolutionists study the fossils found in the earth. It will be shown that the logic of fossil interpretation has not yet reached the level of acceptable academic standards. I NTROoUCTI ON In an attempt to explain man ' s origin without invoking God and his omnipotent power, evolutionists start with inanimate matter, such as rocks, and natural forces like gravity and magnetism.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Evolution
    1 Have They Discovered Monkey-human Links? Dr. Johnson C. Philip Dr. Saneesh Cherian Copyright: 2017 By Logos Literature Service Electronic Tracts This Book Has Been Placed In Creative Commons Copyright. You Are Free To Reproduce Or Translate It In Any Manner – Without Any Change Electronic Tract Division Logos Literature Service English Electronic Tract 004 2 Have They Discovered The Ape-man? There is a widespread claim, mostly in school and college textbooks that man has developed from Apes or from Ape-like creatures. A large number fossil-names are mentioned by these book, and also in the popular media, to support the monkeys-to-man hypothesis. Obviously, the account of creation as mentioned in the Bible and these ape-man claims are at variance with each other. So what is the truth? Examine for yourself! Here are the facts, and YOU decide if they are true or false! Dr. Johnson C. Philip Dr. Saneesh Cherian 3 Make Use of Technology We live in a generation where anyone can easily investigate the claims made in this book. We strongly encourage you to do so! You do not have to take our word for it. The Internet is a vast library with all kinds of information on every subject and you can check for these things even on your smartphone. We have formatted this coming for printing on A5 size paper. If you print on larger (such as A4) size, then do not choose “fit to page” option because this comic good fit only on A5 size paper. This formatting ensures that the coming is highly readable on smartphones.
    [Show full text]