DOCSLIB.ORG

MATH 210A, FALL 2017 Question 1. Let a and B Be Two N × N Matrices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MATH 210A, FALL 2017 Question 1. Let a and B Be Two N × N Matrices MATH 210A, FALL 2017 HW 6 SOLUTIONS WRITTEN BY DAN DORE (If you find any errors, please email [email protected]) Question 1. Let A and B be two n × n matrices with entries in a field K. −1 Let L be a field extension of K, and suppose there exists C 2 GLn(L) such that B = CAC . −1 Prove there exists D 2 GLn(K) such that B = DAD . (that is, turn the argument sketched in class into an actual proof) Solution. We’ll start off by proving the existence and uniqueness of rational canonical forms in a precise way. d d−1 To do this, recall that the companion matrix for a monic polynomial p(t) = t + ad−1t + ··· + a0 2 K[t] is defined to be the (d − 1) × (d − 1) matrix 0 1 0 0 ··· 0 −a0 B C B1 0 ··· 0 −a1 C B C B0 1 ··· 0 −a2 C M(p) := B C B: : : C B: :: : C @ A 0 0 ··· 1 −ad−1 This is the matrix representing the action of t in the cyclic K[t]-module K[t]=(p(t)) with respect to the ordered basis 1; t; : : : ; td−1. Proposition 1 (Rational Canonical Form). For any matrix M over a field K, there is some matrix B 2 GLn(K) such that −1 BMB ' Mcan := M(p1) ⊕ M(p2) ⊕ · · · ⊕ M(pm) Here, p1; : : : ; pn are monic polynomials in K[t] with p1 j p2 j · · · j pm. The monic polynomials pi are 1 −1 uniquely determined by M, so if for some C 2 GLn(K) we have CMC = M(q1) ⊕ · · · ⊕ M(qk) for q1 j q1 j · · · j qm 2 K[t], then m = k and qi = pi for each i. Moreover, if ι: K,−! L is a field extension, then if we let ι(M) denote the matrix M considered as a matrix with coefficients in L, we have ι(M)can = ι(Mcan). In other words, the rational canonical form does not depend on which field we consider the coefficients of M to lie inside. Before we give the proof, let’s see why this implies the statement of the question. By the proposition, −1 −1 there exist matrices α; β 2 GLn(K) such that Acan = αAα and Bcan = βBβ . But then, letting ι: K,−! L be the field extension, we have: −1 −1 −1 ι(Bcan) = ι(β)ι(B)ι(β) = (ι(β)C)ι(A)(C ι(β) ) −1 Let γ = (ι(β)C) 2 GLn(L), so we have ι(Bcan) = γι(A)γ . By the uniqueness part of the proposition, this implies that ι(Bcan) = ι(A)can. By the part of the proposition regarding field extensions, we have ι(A)can = ι(Acan), so ι(Acan) = ι(Bcan). Since ι is injective, this implies that Acan = Bcan, i.e. that −1 −1 −1 −1 αAα = βBβ . Letting D = βα 2 GLn(K), this shows us that B = DAD . Now, let’s prove the proposition: 1 Q In particular, i pi is the characteristic polynomial of M and pm is the minimal polynomial of M. 1 Proof. This follows from the invariant factor form of the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain. Namely, if M is a n × n matrix, we may regard it as a linear transformation on V := Kn with respect to the standard ordered basis of Kn. Defining t · v = Mv, we may give V the structure of a K[t]-module. V is finitely generated as a K[t]-module (since it is finite-dimensional as a K-vector space), so by the invariant factor form of the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain, there is an isomorphism r ∼ ': K[t] ⊕ K[t]=(p1(t)) ⊕ K[t]=(p2(t)) ⊕ · · · ⊕ K[t]=(pm(t)) −! V (1) for p1; : : : ; pm 2 K[t] with p1 j p2 j · · · j pm, and this isomorphism is as a t-module. Note that r = 0, so we may omit the K[t]r factor: K[t] has infinite dimension as a K-vector space, but V has finite dimension n. Furthermore, this theorem tells us that the principal ideals (pi) are uniquely determined by the K[t]-module V (i.e. they are uniquely determined by M). Thus, the pi are unique up to multiplication by a unit of K[t]. We know that these units are exactly the non-zero elements of K, so if we add the requirement that the pi are monic, they are uniquely determined as elements of K[t]. If di = deg pi and e1; : : : ; em are the images of 1 2 K[t]=(pi(t)) under the canonical inclusions into d −1 d −1 dm−1 the direct sum, then b := fe1; t · e1; : : : ; t 1 · e1; e2; : : : ; t 2 · e2; : : : ; em; : : : ; t · emg is an ordered basis for the left-hand side. Since M(pi) is the matrix of the linear transformation t acting on K[t]=(pi(t)) with respect to the ordered basis 1; : : : ; tdi−1, we see that the matrix of the linear transformation t acting on the left-hand-side of (1) with respect to b is Mcan. Now, since ' is an isomorphism of K[t]-modules, we see that B := '(b) is an ordered basis of V and n that the matrix of t with respect to B is Mcan. Let f be the standard ordered basis of K ' V , and define a Pn matrix (Bij) by the equations fi = j=1 BjiBj , which are uniquely determined because B is a basis. Since Pn 0 f is also a basis, we may also uniquely write Bj = k=1 Bkjfk , so this tells us that n n X X 0 fj = BkiBijfk i=1 k=1 0 0 Since f is a basis, we may compare coefficients to see that B ·B = I, so B 2 GLn(K). Note that B ·B = I as well, i.e. B0 = B−1. This says that: 0 n 1 0 X 0 fj = BB fj = B @ BkjfkA = BBj k=1 −1 −1 We want to show that Mcan = BMB . This says that in the standard ordered basis f, BMB (fj) = Pn i=1(Mcan)ijfi. 2 We have, using the fact that Mcan is the matrix for M with respect to the basis B: −1 0 BMB (fj) = BMB (fj) 0 n 1 X 0 = BM @ BkjfkA k=1 = BM(Bj) 0 1 X = B @ (Mcan)ijBiA i X = (Mcan)ijB(Bi) i X = (Mcan)ijfi i −1 Now, assume that we have some C 2 GLn(K) with CMC = N := M(q1) ⊕ · · · ⊕ M(q`) with n q1 j q2 j · · · j qm and qi monic for all i. Let W be the K[t] module K with t acting by the matrix N with n respect to the standard basis f of K . Thus, W ' K[t]=(q1(t)) ⊕ · · · ⊕ K[t]=(q`(t)). We consider C as an ∼ P homomorphism V −! W , sending fj to i Cijfi. Then we have C(t · v) = CMv = NCv = t · (C(v)) for all v 2 V , so C is an homomorphism of K[t]-modules. Since C 2 GLn(K), it is bijective and thus an isomorphism of K[t]-modules. Thus, we have an isomorphism: K[t]=(p1(t)) ⊕ · · · ⊕ K[t]=(pm(t)) ' K[t]=(q1(t)) ⊕ · · · ⊕ K[t]=(q`(t)) Now, we may apply the uniqueness of the invariant factor form of the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain to conclude that ` = m and (pi) = (qi) as principal ideals. Thus, qi and pi differ by multiplication by a non-zero element of K, and since they are both assumed to be monic, we have pi = qi. Finally, we need to show that the rational canonical form is preserved by field extensions. This is a consequence of the above existence and uniqueness statements. Let ι: K,−! L be a field extension and consider the matrix ι(M) with coefficients in L. By the existence of rational canonical form, we know that −1 L there is a matrix B 2 GLn(K) with BMB = Mcan = i M(pi) with p1 j · · · j pm and pi 2 K[t] −1 L L monic. Applying ι, we have ι(B)ι(M)ι(B) = ι(Mcan) = i ι(M(pi)) = i M(ι(pi)), where ι(pi) is the polynomial pi 2 K[t] viewed as a polynomial with coefficients in L. Now, ι(pi) = qi is a monic polynomial in L[t], and the condition that pi j pi+1, i.e. pi+1 = pi · fi with fi 2 K[t], is also preserved by ι (since ι(pi+1) = ι(pi) · ι(fi) and ι(fi) 2 L[t]). Thus, ι(Mcan) is conjugate to ι(M) by ι(B) 2 GLn(L), L` and it is of the form i=1 M(qi) with qi monic and q1 j · · · j q`. Thus, by the above uniqueness statement, ι(Mcan) is in rational canonical form, so ι(Mcan) = ι(M)can. Note that this invariance under field extensions is not true for other normal forms of matrices, such as the normal form obtained by using the elementary divisor version of the structure theorem for principal ideal domains: if π(t) is irreducible as an element of K[t] but not of L[t], then the matrix corresponding to the K[t]-module K[t]=(πe) is not in its “elementary divisor form” as a matrix with coefficients in L.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toeplitz Nonnegative Realization of Spectra Via Companion Matrices Received July 25, 2019; Accepted November 26, 2019
    Spec. Matrices 2019; 7:230–245 Research Article Open Access Special Issue Dedicated to Charles R. Johnson Macarena Collao, Mario Salas, and Ricardo L. Soto* Toeplitz nonnegative realization of spectra via companion matrices https://doi.org/10.1515/spma-2019-0017 Received July 25, 2019; accepted November 26, 2019 Abstract: The nonnegative inverse eigenvalue problem (NIEP) is the problem of nding conditions for the exis- tence of an n × n entrywise nonnegative matrix A with prescribed spectrum Λ = fλ1, . , λng. If the problem has a solution, we say that Λ is realizable and that A is a realizing matrix. In this paper we consider the NIEP for a Toeplitz realizing matrix A, and as far as we know, this is the rst work which addresses the Toeplitz nonnegative realization of spectra. We show that nonnegative companion matrices are similar to nonnegative Toeplitz ones. We note that, as a consequence, a realizable list Λ = fλ1, . , λng of complex numbers in the left-half plane, that is, with Re λi ≤ 0, i = 2, . , n, is in particular realizable by a Toeplitz matrix. Moreover, we show how to construct symmetric nonnegative block Toeplitz matrices with prescribed spectrum and we explore the universal realizability of lists, which are realizable by this kind of matrices. We also propose a Matlab Toeplitz routine to compute a Toeplitz solution matrix. Keywords: Toeplitz nonnegative inverse eigenvalue problem, Unit Hessenberg Toeplitz matrix, Symmetric nonnegative block Toeplitz matrix, Universal realizability MSC: 15A29, 15A18 Dedicated with admiration and special thanks to Charles R. Johnson. 1 Introduction The nonnegative inverse eigenvalue problem (hereafter NIEP) is the problem of nding necessary and sucient conditions for a list Λ = fλ1, λ2, .
    [Show full text]
  • The Polar Decomposition of Block Companion Matrices
    The polar decomposition of block companion matrices Gregory Kalogeropoulos1 and Panayiotis Psarrakos2 September 28, 2005 Abstract m m¡1 Let L(¸) = In¸ + Am¡1¸ + ¢ ¢ ¢ + A1¸ + A0 be an n £ n monic matrix polynomial, and let CL be the corresponding block companion matrix. In this note, we extend a known result on scalar polynomials to obtain a formula for the polar decomposition of CL when the matrices A0 Pm¡1 ¤ and j=1 Aj Aj are nonsingular. Keywords: block companion matrix, matrix polynomial, eigenvalue, singular value, polar decomposition. AMS Subject Classifications: 15A18, 15A23, 65F30. 1 Introduction and notation Consider the monic matrix polynomial m m¡1 L(¸) = In¸ + Am¡1¸ + ¢ ¢ ¢ + A1¸ + A0; (1) n£n where Aj 2 C (j = 0; 1; : : : ; m ¡ 1; m ¸ 2), ¸ is a complex variable and In denotes the n £ n identity matrix. The study of matrix polynomials, especially with regard to their spectral analysis, has a long history and plays an important role in systems theory [1, 2, 3, 4]. A scalar ¸0 2 C is said to be an eigenvalue of n L(¸) if the system L(¸0)x = 0 has a nonzero solution x0 2 C . This solution x0 is known as an eigenvector of L(¸) corresponding to ¸0. The set of all eigenvalues of L(¸) is the spectrum of L(¸), namely, sp(L) = f¸ 2 C : detL(¸) = 0g; and contains no more than nm distinct (finite) elements. 1Department of Mathematics, University of Athens, Panepistimioupolis 15784, Athens, Greece (E-mail: [email protected]). 2Department of Mathematics, National Technical University, Zografou Campus 15780, Athens, Greece (E-mail: [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • NON-SPARSE COMPANION MATRICES∗ 1. Introduction. The
    Electronic Journal of Linear Algebra, ISSN 1081-3810 A publication of the International Linear Algebra Society Volume 35, pp. 223-247, June 2019. NON-SPARSE COMPANION MATRICES∗ LOUIS DEAETTy , JONATHAN FISCHERz , COLIN GARNETTx , AND KEVIN N. VANDER MEULEN{ Abstract. Given a polynomial p(z), a companion matrix can be thought of as a simple template for placing the coefficients of p(z) in a matrix such that the characteristic polynomial is p(z). The Frobenius companion and the more recently-discovered Fiedler companion matrices are examples. Both the Frobenius and Fiedler companion matrices have the maximum possible number of zero entries, and in that sense are sparse. In this paper, companion matrices are explored that are not sparse. Some constructions of non-sparse companion matrices are provided, and properties that all companion matrices must exhibit are given. For example, it is shown that every companion matrix realization is non-derogatory. Bounds on the minimum number of zeros that must appear in a companion matrix, are also given. Key words. Companion matrix, Fiedler companion matrix, Non-derogatory matrix, Characteristic polynomial. AMS subject classifications. 15A18, 15B99, 11C20, 05C50. 1. Introduction. The Frobenius companion matrix to the polynomial n n−1 n−2 (1.1) p(z) = z + a1z + a2z + ··· + an−1z + an is the matrix 2 0 1 0 ··· 0 3 6 0 0 1 ··· 0 7 6 7 6 . 7 (1.2) F = 6 . .. 7 : 6 . 7 6 7 4 0 0 0 ··· 1 5 −an −an−1 · · · −a2 −a1 2 In general, a companion matrix to p(z) is an n×n matrix C = C(p) over R[a1; a2; : : : ; an] with n −n entries in R and the remaining entries variables −a1; −a2;:::; −an such that the characteristic polynomial of C is p(z).
    [Show full text]
  • Permanental Compounds and Permanents of (O,L)-Circulants*
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Permanental Compounds and Permanents of (O,l)-Circulants* Henryk Mint Department of Mathematics University of California Santa Barbara, Califmia 93106 Submitted by Richard A. Brualdi ABSTRACT It was shown by the author in a recent paper that a recurrence relation for permanents of (0, l)-circulants can be generated from the product of the characteristic polynomials of permanental compounds of the companion matrix of a polynomial associated with (O,l)-circulants of the given type. In the present paper general properties of permanental compounds of companion matrices are studied, and in particular of convertible companion matrices, i.e., matrices whose permanental com- pounds are equal to the determinantal compounds after changing the signs of some of their entries. These results are used to obtain formulas for the limit of the nth root of the permanent of the n X n (0, l)-circulant of a given type, as n tends to infinity. The root-squaring method is then used to evaluate this limit for a wide range of circulant types whose associated polynomials have convertible companion matrices. 1. INTRODUCTION tit Q,,, denote the set of increasing sequences of integers w = (+w2,..., w,), 1 < w1 < w2 < * 9 * < w, < t. If A = (ajj) is an s X t matrix, and (YE Qh,s, p E QkSt, then A[Lx~/~] denotes the h X k submatrix of A whose (i, j) entry is aa,Bj, i = 1,2 ,..., h, j = 1,2,.. ., k, and A(aIP) desig- nates the (s - h) X (t - k) submatrix obtained from A by deleting rows indexed (Y and columns indexed /I.
    [Show full text]
  • Matrix Theory
    Matrix Theory Xingzhi Zhan +VEHYEXI7XYHMIW MR1EXLIQEXMGW :SPYQI %QIVMGER1EXLIQEXMGEP7SGMIX] Matrix Theory https://doi.org/10.1090//gsm/147 Matrix Theory Xingzhi Zhan Graduate Studies in Mathematics Volume 147 American Mathematical Society Providence, Rhode Island EDITORIAL COMMITTEE David Cox (Chair) Daniel S. Freed Rafe Mazzeo Gigliola Staffilani 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 15-01, 15A18, 15A21, 15A60, 15A83, 15A99, 15B35, 05B20, 47A63. For additional information and updates on this book, visit www.ams.org/bookpages/gsm-147 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Zhan, Xingzhi, 1965– Matrix theory / Xingzhi Zhan. pages cm — (Graduate studies in mathematics ; volume 147) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8218-9491-0 (alk. paper) 1. Matrices. 2. Algebras, Linear. I. Title. QA188.Z43 2013 512.9434—dc23 2013001353 Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy a chapter for use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in reviews, provided the customary acknowledgment of the source is given. Republication, systematic copying, or multiple reproduction of any material in this publication is permitted only under license from the American Mathematical Society. Requests for such permission should be addressed to the Acquisitions Department, American Mathematical Society, 201 Charles Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02904-2294 USA. Requests can also be made by e-mail to [email protected]. c 2013 by the American Mathematical Society. All rights reserved. The American Mathematical Society retains all rights except those granted to the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Computing Rational Forms of Integer Matrices
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector J. Symbolic Computation (2002) 34, 157–172 doi:10.1006/jsco.2002.0554 Available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Computing Rational Forms of Integer Matrices MARK GIESBRECHT† AND ARNE STORJOHANN‡ School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1 n×n A new algorithm is presented for finding the Frobenius rational form F ∈ Z of any n×n 4 3 A ∈ Z which requires an expected number of O(n (log n + log kAk) + n (log n + log kAk)2) word operations using standard integer and matrix arithmetic (where kAk = maxij |Aij |). This substantially improves on the fastest previously known algorithms. The algorithm is probabilistic of the Las Vegas type: it assumes a source of random bits but always produces the correct answer. Las Vegas algorithms are also presented for computing a transformation matrix to the Frobenius form, and for computing the rational Jordan form of an integer matrix. c 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction In this paper we present new algorithms for exactly computing the Frobenius and rational Jordan normal forms of an integer matrix which are substantially faster than those previously known. We show that the Frobenius form F ∈ Zn×n of any A ∈ Zn×n can be computed with an expected number of O(n4(log n+log kAk)+n3(log n+log kAk)2) word operations using standard integer and matrix arithmetic. Here and throughout this paper, kAk = maxij |Aij|.
    [Show full text]
  • New Classes of Matrix Decompositions
    NEW CLASSES OF MATRIX DECOMPOSITIONS KE YE Abstract. The idea of decomposing a matrix into a product of structured matrices such as tri- angular, orthogonal, diagonal matrices is a milestone of numerical computations. In this paper, we describe six new classes of matrix decompositions, extending our work in [8]. We prove that every n × n matrix is a product of finitely many bidiagonal, skew symmetric (when n is even), companion matrices and generalized Vandermonde matrices, respectively. We also prove that a generic n × n centrosymmetric matrix is a product of finitely many symmetric Toeplitz (resp. persymmetric Hankel) matrices. We determine an upper bound of the number of structured matrices needed to decompose a matrix for each case. 1. Introduction Matrix decomposition is an important technique in numerical computations. For example, we have classical matrix decompositions: (1) LU: a generic matrix can be decomposed as a product of an upper triangular matrix and a lower triangular matrix. (2) QR: every matrix can be decomposed as a product of an orthogonal matrix and an upper triangular matrix. (3) SVD: every matrix can be decomposed as a product of two orthogonal matrices and a diagonal matrix. These matrix decompositions play a central role in engineering and scientific problems related to matrix computations [1],[6]. For example, to solve a linear system Ax = b where A is an n×n matrix and b is a column vector of length n. We can first apply LU decomposition to A to obtain LUx = b, where L is a lower triangular matrix and U is an upper triangular matrix.
    [Show full text]
  • Commutators and Companion Matrices Over Rings of Stable Rank 1
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Commutators and Companion Matrices over Rings of Stable Rank 1 L. N. Vaserstein and E. Wheland Department of Mathematics The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 Submitted by Robert C. Thompson ABSTRACT We consider the group GL,A of all invertible n by n matrices over a ring A satisfying the first Bass stable range condition. We prove that every matrix is similar to the product of a lower and upper triangular matrix, and that it is also the product of two matrices each similar to a companion matrix. We use this to show that, when n > 3 and A is commutative, every matrix in SL,A is the product of two commuta- tors. INTRODUCTION In various situations it is instructive to represent a matrix as a product of matrices of a special nature. A large survey of various results concerning factorization of matrices over a field and bounded operators on a Hilbert space is given in Wu [75]. G’lven a class of matrices (or operators), one studies products of elements from the class, and asks about the minimal number of factors in a factorization. Classes considered in [75] include the class of normal matrices, the class of involutions, the class of symmetric matrices, and many others. See also [14, 11, 15, 16, 711 for various matrix factorizations. A classical factorization result is that every orthogonal n by n matrix is the product of at most n reflections [2, Proposition 5, Chapter IX, $6, Section 41; see [I21 for further work on reflections.
    [Show full text]
  • Jordan and Rational Canonical Forms
    JORDAN AND RATIONAL CANONICAL FORMS MATH 551 Throughout this note, let V be a n-dimensional vector space over a field k, and let φ: V → V be a linear map. Let B = {e1,..., en} be a basis for V , and let A be the matrix for φ with respect to the basis B. Pn Thus φ(ej) = i=1 aijej (so the jth column of A records φ(ej)). This is the standard convention for talking about vector spaces over a field k. To make these conventions coincide with Hungerford, consider V as a right module over k. Recall that if B0 is another basis for V , then the matrix for φ with respect to the basis B0 is CAC−1, where C is the matrix whose ith column is the description of the ith element of B in the basis B0. 1. Rational Canonical Form We give a k[x]-module structure to V by setting x · v = φ(v) = Av. Recall that the structure theorem for modules over a PID (such as k[x]) ∼ r l guarantees that V = k[x] ⊕i=1 k[x]/fi as a k[x]-module. Since V is a finite-dimensional k-module (vector space!), and k[x] is an infinite- ∼ l dimensional k-module, we must have r = 0, so V = ⊕i=1k[x]/fi. By the classification theorem we may assume that f1|f2| ... |fl. We may also assume that each fi is monic (has leading coefficient one). To see this, s Ps−1 i s−1 s Ps−1 s−1−i i let f = λx + i=0 aix .
    [Show full text]
  • The General, Linear Equation
    Chapter 2 The General, Linear Equation Let a1 (x) ; a2 (x) ; : : : ; an (x) be continuous functions defined on the interval a ≤ x ≤ b, and suppose u (x) is n-times differentiable there. We form from u the function Lu, defined as follows: (n) (n−1) 0 (Lu)(x) = u (x) + a1 (x) u (x) + ··· + an−1 (x) u (x) + an (x) u (x) : (2.1) This expression for L in terms of u and its derivatives up to order n is linear in u in the sense that L (αu + βv) = αLu + βLv (2.2) for any constants α; β and any sufficiently differentiable functions u; v: The corresponding linear differential equation has, as in the case of first-order equations, homogeneous and inhomogeneous versions: Lu = 0 (2.3) and Lu = r; (2.4) where, in the latter equation, the function r is prescribed on the interval [a; b]. These equations are in standard form, that is, the coefficient of the highest derivative is one. They are sometimes displayed in an alternative form in which the highest derivative is multiplied by a continuous function a0 (x). As long as this function does not vanish on [a; b] the two forms are interchangeable, and we'll use whichever is the more convenient. 31 32 The linearity, as expressed by equation (2.2), plays a powerful role in the theory of these equations. The following result is an easy consequence of that linearity: Lemma 2.0.2 Equation (2.2) has the following properties: • Suppose u1 and u2 are solutions of the homogeneous equation (2.3); then for arbitrary constants c1 and c2, u = c1u1+c2u2 is also a solution of this equation.
    [Show full text]
  • Unified Canonical Forms for Matrices Over a Differential Ring
    Unified Canonical Forms for Matrices Over a Differential Ring J. Zhu and C. D. Johnson Electrical and Computer Engineering Department University of Alabama in Huntsville Huntsville, Alabama 35899 Submitted by Russell Menis ABSTRACT Linear differential equations with variable coefficients of the vector form (i) % = A(t)x and the scalar form (ii) y(“) + cy,(t)y(“-‘) + . * . + a2(thj + a,(t)y = 0 can be studied as operators on a differential module over a differential ring. Using this differential algebraic structure and a classical result on differential operator factoriza- tions developed by Cauchy and Floquet, a new (variable) eigenvalue theory and an associated set of matrix canonical forms are developed in this paper for matrices over a differential ring. In particular, eight new spectral and modal matrix canonical forms are developed that include as special cases the classical companion, Jordan (diagonal), and (generalized) Vandermonde canonical forms, as traditionally used for matrices over a number ring (field). Therefore, these new matrix canonical forms can be viewed as unifications of those classical ones. Two additional canonical matrices that perform order reductions of a Cauchy-Floquet factorization of a linear differential operator are also introduced. General and explicit formulas for obtaining the new canonical forms are derived in terms of the new (variable) eigenvalues. The results obtained here have immediate applications in diverse engineering and scientific fields, such as physics, control systems, communications, and electrical networks, in which linear differential equations (i) and (ii) are used as mathematical models. 1. INTRODUCTION This paper is concerned with the class of finite-dimensional, homoge- neous linear differential equations of the vector form S = A( t)x, x(h) = x0 (1.1) LlNEAR ALGEBRA AND ITS APPLlCATlONS 147:201-248 (1991) 201 0 Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., 1991 655 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10010 0024-3795/91/$3.50 202 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Cyclotomic Fields and Their Subfields
    Representation of Cyclotomic Fields and Their Subfields A. Satyanarayana Reddy∗ Shashank K Mehta † A. K. Lal‡ Abstract Let K be a finite extension of a characteristic zero field F. We say that a pair of n × n matrices (A, B) over F represents K if K =∼ F[A]/hBi, where F[A] denotes the subalgebra of Mn(F) containing A and hBi is an ideal in F[A], generated by B. In particular, A is said to represent the field K if there exists an irreducible polynomial q(x) ∈ F[x] which divides the minimal polynomial of A and K =∼ F[A]/hq(A)i. In this paper, we identify the smallest order circulant matrix representation for any subfield of a cyclotomic field. Furthermore, if p is a prime and K is a subfield of the p-th cyclotomic field, then we obtain a zero-one circulant matrix A of size p × p such that (A, J) represents K, where J is the matrix with all entries 1. In case, the integer n has at most two distinct prime factors, we find the smallest order 0, 1-companion matrix that represents the n-th cyclotomic field. We also find bounds on the size of such companion matrices when n has more than two prime factors. Keywords: Circulant matrix, Companion Matrix, Cyclotomic field, Cyclotomic Polynomial, M¨obius Function, Ramanujan Sum. Mathematics Subject Classification 2010: 15A18, 15B05, 11C08, 12F10. 1 Introduction and Preliminaries In this paper, we will be interested in fields F that have characteristic 0. Thus, one can assume that Q F C, where Q is the field of rational numbers and C is the field of complex numbers.
    [Show full text]